Several well-known international companies such as Deliottes have abolished their performance appraisal system. Others such as the BBC in the UK have scrapped their ratings system. There is a distinct shift away from the performance appraisal of employees toward performance development. Is this a wise move?
1. The death of the performance review
Dr. Tim Baker
tim@winnersatwork.com.au
www.winnesatwork.com.au
2. Understand why performance reviews are outdated & ineffective
Develop some strategies for shifting from appraisals to development
Familiarise yourself with the process of the Five Conversations Framework
3.
4. Some reflections …
GE announced it was abolishing its "rank and yank" system, which assigns
employees a performance score relative to their peers and results in the
lowest percentile getting fired.
5. Accenture’s 330,000 employees are undergoing what CEO Pierre
Nanterme has called a "massive revolution" in which timely,
personalized employee feedback is replacing annual evaluations
and rankings.
Some reflections …
6. Microsoft’s overhaul of its own performance management process
as a move in this direction.
Some reflections …
7. As Laszlo Bock, SVP of People Operations at Google, recently
wrote:
“Performance management as practiced by most
organizations has become a rule-based, bureaucratic
process, existing as an end in itself rather than actually shaping
performance. Employees hate it. Managers hate it. Even HR
departments hate it.”
Some reflections …
8. If we want employees working
together, not competing with one
another, towards achieving
common goals removing ratings is
a good starting point.
9. What’s Wrong
With the
Traditional
Performance
Appraisal?
They are a costly exercise
Appraisals can be destructive
Appraisals are often a monologue
rather than a dialogue
The formality of the appraisal
stifles discussion
Appraisals are too infrequent
Appraisals are an exercise
in form-filling
Appraisals are rarely followed up
Most people find appraisals stressful
13. Myths about
performance
reviews
Myth 1: Increasing individual performance
increases organisational performance
Myth 2: We need the performance review to
objectively categorise people
Myth 3: Managers are in the best position to
make judgments about people's performance
Myth 4: Performance reviews enhance
employee performance
Myth 5: Performance reviews are designed to
help employees
14. Roles people play in
organisations are more
important than the jobs
they do...
15. The Work People Do
Job role Non-job roles
Technical skills
Team role
Career role
Innovation &
Continuous
Improvement role
SOURCE: The End of the Performance Review
Positive mental
attitude
& enthusiasm
16.
17. The five conversations framework
Date Topic Content Key Questions
Month 1 Climate review Job satisfaction, morale
and communication
• How would you rate your current job satisfaction?
• How would you rate morale?
• How would you rate communication?
Month 2 Strengths
and talents
Efficiently deploying
strengths and talents
• What are your strengths and talents?
• How can these strengths and talents be used in your current and
future roles in the organisation?
Month 3 Opportunities
for growth
Improving performance
and standards
• Where are opportunities for improved performance?
• How can I assist you to improve your performance?
Month 4 Learning and
development
Support and growth • What skills would you like to learn?
• What learning opportunities would you like to undertake?
Month 5 Innovation and
continuous
improvement
Ways and means to improve
the efficiency and
effectiveness of the business
• What is the one way that you could improve your own working
efficiency?
• What is the one way that we can improve our team’s operations?
Baker, T. (2013). The End of the Performance Review: A New Approach to Appraising Employee Performance
My research of 1,200 HR managers identified the following eight shortcomings of the performance review.
Jobs have been around since the Industrial revolution for 200 years. Taylor conceptualized a job as a clearly defined set of tasks to be done. These days work is more complex. The marketplace more uncertain. Employees play a significant number of roles in organizations beyong simply the technical role.
This was a survey of 9,000 managers across 21 industry groups in six countries. You will notice that the top 10 job skills are non-job tasks.
So those are the main barriers to communication.
So how do we encourage more productive conversations and meaningful dialogue?
You need a framework in place that promotes these conversations.
I want to share with you two frameworks.
Both of these frameworks can, and should be, recorded for reference.
The first of this frameworks that we discuss in Conversations at Work is The Five Conversations Framework.
Briefly describe the framework and the fact that some organisations are using this as a substitute for the traditional performance review.