In this set of slides I present the most important theories and some evidence on the different determinants of economic growth, with some emphasis on productivity and the work by Ricardo Hausmann and co-authors.
5. USA
is
387
Ames
richer
than
DR
Congo
(or
145X
in
PPP
terms)
Australia
24401
33369
Belgium
25055
33520
Germany
25420
33665
Canada
26143
36039
Hong
Kong
34587
40599
Switzerland
37789
37780
United
States
38206
43179
Japan
40481
31484
PPP
Richest
x4
Market
Prices
GDP
Per
Capita
(2/2)
in
USD
$
6. CumGDPi
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
India
China
USA
Bangladesh
Pakistan
Nigeria
Indonesia
Egypt
Brazil
Mexico
Russia
Japan
Germany
France
UK
Italy
CumulaAve
world
populaAon
CumulaAve
world
income
Korea
Global
Income
DistribuAon
7. Would
you
rather
be
rich
in
a
poor
country,
or
poor
in
a
rich
country?
(credit
to
Dani
Rodrik)
Norway’s
poorest
5%
has
a
representaAve
income
of
~$13K
In
Niger,
the
richest
5%
of
the
populaAon
has
a
representaAve
income
of
~$2K
11. Robert
Solow,
Nobel
Prize
in
Economics
1987
• Solow
developed
one
of
the
most
influenAal
economic
growth
models.
• Income
growth
based
on
factor
accumulaAon
is
a
transiAonal
phenomenon,
as
countries
move
toward
a
“steady
state”.
No
growth
in
the
long
run
without
technological
advancement.
• Convergence:
poorer
countries
grow
faster
than
richer
countries,
as
they
“catch
up”
capital
accumulaAon.
12. Years
of
schooling
and
income
per
capita
1965-‐2005
France
1985
US$
21315
Mexico
1993
10544
Ghana
1998=1015
GDP
per
capita
in
constant
dollars,
logs
Thailand
2005
US$
6751
Mexico
2005
US$
12593
France
1993
US$
24430
15. • “Institutions are the humanly devised
constraints that shape human interaction in a
society” (North, 1990)
• Daron Acemoglu (MIT) and his co-authors
have pioneered the theory of institutions as
the main input for economic growth:
• Countries are less developed where colonizers
created “extractive” institutions (i..e. LAC, Africa)
• Corruption, lack of trust, type of “culture”,
doing business, regulations, bureaucracy,
social capital, etc.
• Markets require (proper) institutions to work.
In their absence, markets cannot work.
19. Trade:
• Opening to trade allow us to import what we are not
good at, and export what we are good at.
• Most productive firms survive, allowing for
“reallocation” of resources to more productive
activities.
Foreign Direct Investment (Capital):
• More productive firms arrive,
“spilling” their productivity to
domestic firms.
Migration:
• Allows for easier trade and capital flows
• Boost knowledge diffusion across countries boosting
productivity
20. • By
1960,
migrants
made
up
2.63%
of
the
global
populaAon,
whereas
exports
of
goods
and
services
accounted
for
12.7%
of
global
GDP.
• By
2010,
these
numbers
were
3.11%and
28.19%,
respecAvely.
23. How geography correlates with income?
• Climate defines endowments and type of
activities poor countries could made in the past
(agriculture)
• Being landlocked (or far away) reduces
integration.
• Some diseases are more prevalent in tropics (i.e.
malaria), affecting productivity
• Knowledge tends to diffuse very locally
25. Knowledge
intensity
Distance
between
HQ
and
Subsidiary
Knowledge
intensity
Distance
between
HQ
and
Subsidiary
Source:
Bahar,
D.
“Heavier
than
air?
Knowledge
diffusion
within
the
mul7na7onal
firm”
(2015)
Knowledge
travels
short
geographic
distances:
even
within
a
large
MNC
47. Knowledge has a
large tacit
component.
Michael Polanyi (1966)
Channels for
knowledge
transmission are
limited to human
interaction
Kenneth Arrow (1969)
52. Countries face the “chicken and egg problem”
• You cannot make watches without watchmakers
• You don’t want to be watchmaker if nobody makes watches
• You cannot become a watchmaker because there are not
watchmakers to learn from
• How does the world deal with this?
• By moving towards products that “share”
knowhow and knowledge
53. ELECTRONICS
MACHINERY
AIRCRAFT
BOILERS
SHIPS
METAL PRODUCTS
CONSTR. MATL. & EQPT.
HOME & OFFICE
PULP & PAPER
CHEMICALS & HEALTH
AGROCHEMICALS
OTHER CHEMICALS
INOR. SALTS & ACIDS
PETROCHEMICALS
LEATHER
MILK & CHEESE
ANIMAL FIBERS
MEAT & EGGS
FISH & SEAFOOD
TROPICAL AGRIC.
CEREALS & VEG. OILS
COTTON/RICE/SOY & OTHERS
TOBACCO
FRUIT
MISC. AGRICULTURE
NOT CLASSIFIED
TEXTILE & FABRICS
GARMENTS
FOOD PROCESSING
BEER/SPIRITS & CIGS.
PRECIOUS STONES
COAL
OIL
MINING
54. The process of development
• Involves accumulating
more letters (knowledge)
• …and expressing them in
more words (products)
• …and in longer words
(more complex products)
55. In a perfect world…
… innovators have access to all inputs (letters)!
76. “Knowledge
and
skill
diffusion
is
the
key
to
overall
producAvity
growth
as
well
as
the
reducAon
of
inequality
both
within
and
between
countries”
(Pike^y
2014)
77.
78. .38.4.42.44.46.48
CPS_Gini
−5 0 5 10 15 20
Time from MDP Establishment
Winner Loser
15
years
down
the
line,
the
average
“winner”
county
ranks
0.02
points
lower
in
the
Gini
coefficient,
across
all
MSAs
Source:
Bahar,
D.
“TTes7ng
Pike>y:
A
natural
experiment
on
knowledge
diffusion
and
inequality
dynamics
in
America”,
(2015)
82. Market failures that stop the
“invisible hand”
• Unequal access to economic
resources (i.e. credit, full information,
risk uncertainty)
• Social and private returns differ,
externalities (i.e. pollution, workers’
trainings, etc.)
• Institutional failures (e.g. corruption,
too much or too little regulation, etc.)
• Poor macroeconomics (e.g. inflation
or deflation)
• Coordination failures (e.g. lack of
infrastructure, lack of complementary
markets)
83. • A good solution understands
the market failure (the
cause) and not solves only a
symptom
• For example: Why should the
gov’t subsidize
entrepreneurs? Why can’t
entrepreneurs raise money?
• The solution must provide
the proper incentives, b/c
otherwise it wont work!
• Does providing mosquito
nets help reducing malaria?
84. • How to determine what the market
failure is? Ask questions like:
• What is the structure of
incentives that generates this
problem?
• Why hasn’t the private sector
done this yet? Are the ones who
overcome this failure are rare?
• Will the solution change the
incentives to achieve the goal?
For effective policy, our work to ask the “wtf”
question, and why is this solution addressing the
cause of the problem and not only a symptom.