Download as PDF, PPTX
Uploaded byCrossref
2013 CrossRef Annual Meeting Building Skyscrapers With Our Scholarship Heather Piwowar
The document discusses the challenges and advancements in scholarship access, likening it to the development of elevators that enable the construction of taller skyscrapers. It emphasizes the need for open access to research and the establishment of standard practices to enhance collaboration and reuse in the academic community. The author advocates for a future where scholarship is more accessible and interconnected through appropriate sharing mechanisms.
More Related Content
Similar to 2013 CrossRef Annual Meeting Building Skyscrapers With Our Scholarship Heather Piwowar
2013 CrossRef Annual Meeting Building Skyscrapers With Our Scholarship Heather Piwowar
- 1. Building skyscrapers with ourscholarship Heather Piwowar @researchremix cofounder @ImpactStory Crossref Annual Meeting November 2013 #crossref13 some photos NC, SA
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
- 6.
- 7.
- 8.
- 9.
- 10.
- 11.
- 12.
- 13.
- 14.
- 15.
- 16.
- 17.
- 18.
- 19.
- 20.
- 21.
- 22.
- 23.
- 24.
- 25.
- 26.
- 27.
- 28.
- 29.
- 30.
- 31. what’s going tolet us build skyscrapers with our scholarship?
- 32.
- 33. geek-speak for computers talking tocomputers
- 34. Before the elevator, peoplecould only get higher using their legs
- 35.
- 36. after: machines did someof the heavy lifting
- 37.
- 38. before APIs, people couldonly get higher using their eyes
- 39.
- 40. now, machines can do someof the heavy lifting
- 42. When all tallbuildings have elevators
- 43. We spend lesseffort to climb up
- 44. And, the buildingscan get taller.
- 46. Where are weon this path?
- 47. I’m a scientistwho wants to take the elevator.
- 48. My research *needs* tobe built on top of the research of others, on a large scale.
- 49. A little challengingat the moment for an elevator enthusiast.
- 50. citations for 10,000papers
- 53. citations for 10,000papers
- 55.
- 57.
- 59. • institutional subscription •personal subscription • pleading email • walk-in access
- 61.
- 62.
- 63.
- 64.
- 65. So I didtwo things.
- 66. 1. back roomdeal.
- 67. 2. found aninstitution and joined it
- 68.
- 69. which required afieldtrip to the police station in the worst neighbourhood in my city
- 70.
- 71.
- 72. How can wefix this?
- 73. How can weget to the point where our scholarship is connected with elevators?
- 74. What kinds ofelevators should they be?
- 75.
- 76.
- 77.
- 78.
- 79.
- 80.
- 81.
- 82. evolve then adopt standardfittings
- 83.
- 84. not monolithic systems, standardfittings.
- 85.
- 86.
- 87.
- 88.
- 89.
- 90.
- 91.
- 94.
- 96. big win! in theopen strong reuse terms no additional cost not restricted to library-IT
- 97. I got luckyon twitter Time consuming Tied to institution Negotiation doesn’t scale Need subscriptions.
- 98.
- 100. so... what haveI done with it?
- 101.
- 102.
- 103. project 1: analysiswas already done project 2: didn’t get the grant project 3: moved to a separate nonprofit organization
- 104.
- 105.
- 106.
- 107.
- 108. reward lots ofkinds of winning
- 109. one kind ofwinner misses important kinds of winning
- 111. just impact factor? justcitations?
- 112.
- 118. to impact flavors CC-BY-NCby maniacyak on flickr http://www.flickr.com/photos/maniacyak/3432589472
- 119. Open metrics, withcontext, for diverse products.! Board: Cameron Neylon John Wilbanks
- 125.
- 126. reward lots ofkinds of winning
- 127. finally, don’t judge demandby requests for an elevator before 1900
- 128.
- 129. it might takea while for adoption
- 130.
- 131.
- 132. 1. different usersand uses 2. standard fittings 3. self-serve, 24/7 4. lots of kinds of winning 5. this is the future
- 133.
- 134. thank you! Jason Priem:cofounder of ImpactStory Todd Vision, NESCent, Mike Whitlock, the open science community, and those who release their articles, datasets and photos openly. impactstory.org
- 137.