Essay On The Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing

Essay On The Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing
In this research i will be going to explain the cons of animals testing. Animal testing is cruel and inhumane. Animal testing is wasteful, it is bad science,
92 out of 100 drugs that pass animal tests fail in humans.
Animals are infected with diseases that they would never normally contract. Tiny mice grow tumors as large as their own bodies, kittens are purposely
blinded, rats are made to suffer seizures and primates. Skulls are cut open and electrodes are implanted in them. Experimenters force–feed chemicals to
animals, conduct repeated surgeries on them, implant wires in their brains and crush their spins. Animals are being used for testing at rapid rates and
yet there have not been any major scientific discoveries made to serve as alternatives...show more content...
The animals being tested may be 99% similar to us, but the other 1% could lead to many errors as animals vary to much in anatomy and biology and
are insufficient models for humans. Animals endure chemicals being dropped into their eyes, injected into their bodies forced up their nostrils or
forced down their throats. They are addicted to drugs, forced to inhale/ingest toxic substances, subjected to maternal deprivation, deafened, blinded,
burned, stapled and infected with disease viruses. Animals endure significant amounts of stress and some are even held in confinement for an
uncounted amount of time. Some experiments on animals require animals to die as a part of the test, for example, regulatory tests for botox, vaccines
and some tests for chemical safety are essentially variations of the cruel lethal dose 50 test in which 50% of the animals die or are killed. Were all
familiar with the phrase "putting lipstick on a pig" but some corporations are thoughtless enough to take it literally. Cosmetics companies have promoted
animal testing for years. While some argue it offers insight into human endangerment. The FDA reports that 92% of drugs approved for testing in
humans fail to receive approval for human use. This
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

The Effects Of Animal Testing Essay
The Effects of Animal Testing
Animal testing is by far, inhumane and downright unacceptable. Although, there are various types of organizations that are pro–animal care, such as,
Animal Welfare information center, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare and,People for the Ethical
Treatment of Animalsor, PETA, all in which do their best to keepanimal testing as humane as possible, there are alternatives for finding cures or testing
the safety of certain products. Animal cruelty is detrimental to numerous species enduring studies in labs; the importance of companies noticing this
tragedy could save millions of animal lives, all while having the same outcomes and benefits for humans or more desirable results.
Animal testing is animal cruelty. The animals or "guinea pigs" per say, used in these experiments are being held captive, obviously against their own
will since they cannot speak, and are under extreme stress. In spite of the fact that, animals cannot voice their discomforts, they do so by refusing to eat
or remaining still as opposed to engaging in normal activity (Schreiner). Particular tests performed lead to genetic mutation and sometimes forced
pregnancies. In the online article, "Effects of Animal Testing," Schreiner states that, "Genetic mutations are induced to test the validity of a scientific
principle or the effect of the manipulation of one or more of the animals' genes." Thus, leading to ineffective interactions

Animal Testing Synthesis Essay
Envision a life without value or care. That is how animals being tested on feel. Animal testing is unethical and corrupt. Human species are not more
deserving than other species. An alternative route should be taken for testing pharmaceutical or cosmetic products.
Imagine having no rights, being treated crudely everyday, and constantly being in pain. That is how animals that live their lives in labs feel every
single day. Many animals die from being tested on, "Animals killed each year worldwide for experiments and drug research range from 50 to 100
million." (Source A). There are organizations like PETA (People or the Ethical Treatment of Animals) that are trying to stop speciesism and get natural
rights for animals. Speciesism is "the habit of attributing greater moral significance to the well–being of animals." (Source C). Animals have the ability
to think and feel just as humans do. This only makes it right for animals to possess rights like humans. Humans should not hold themselves higher than
any other species, "humans are inherently no better than or different from other animals, and should have no right to hold our own interests above the
interests of other species."...show more content...
There are major effects that take part on this animal because of the products being tested on them. In a picture titled "Because I'm Worth It," it shows a
bunny trapped, thinking to itself, "Let's see now...I've been blinded...I've been in excruciating pain for months, and any day now they're gonna give me
a lethal injection." (Source F) Others might argue that this type of testing is necessary like, "Many of the cures we celebrate –– and let's remember that
cancer is now more survivable than ever –– were developed only because researchers were able to carry out experiments on animals." (Source B)
However, there can be alternatives, that do not include the harming or killing of millions of

Essay Benefits Of Animal Testing
Animal testing has been an occurrence since 500 B.C. and has become worldwide. In China, it is the law to have all cosmetics animal tested before
selling. This makes for 300,000 animals tested through cosmetics every year. Although some people find this very cruel, animal testing is actually very
humane and necessary for effective products.
Animal testing has been deemed inhumane by many who oppose it. There are many reasons why this assumption is not true. There are different laws
and companies that participate in keeping this practice safe and humane for animals and people alike. A group called IACUC, or The Institutional
Animal Care and Use Committee, must approve any testing before it is performed. According to the University of Tennessee Knoxville (UTK), the
group is federally mandated and goes hand in hand with the group at UTK (1). A testing facility must, by law, hire a committee within the Institutional
Committee to visit and assess the facility. This applies to all personal testing done by companies as well,...show more content...
The testing of products, such as PHAs and relaxants, are beneficial to both humans and animals alike. PHAs, also known as Polyhydroxyalkanoates,
were discovered through animal testing. They contribute to things such as nerve repair, sutures, cardiac patches, orthopedics, tissue repair, and much
more (Valappil 2). Any anesthetic, antibiotic, or flea and tick medicine for animals was also tested at some point in order for them to be available. An
anonymous author wrote that products to prevent or cure diseases in animals; such as rabies, distemper, feline leukemia, canine parvovirus, etcetera;
have all been animal tested previous to use in clinics (1). Animal testing has kept about 90.5% of harmful products from reaching the market, including
the Veterinary market (Lovell–Badge 1). This saves thousands of lives and pets from tragedy every

Animal Testing Outline
Weldon 1
Animal Testing
Introduction
Thesis Statement: Animal testing is wrong because it is inhumane, costly, and unpredictable.
I. Animal testing is inhumane A. Torture B. Type of testing C. Effect on the animal
II. Animal testing is costly A. The cost of testing B. The cost of research C. What else we could be spending money on
III. Animal testing is wasteful and unpredictable A. Mass Murdering of animals B. Endangered species C. If it works on animals it may not work on
humans
Conclusion
Weldon 1
Hunter Weldon
Mrs. Smith
1st Period
1/6/14
Animal Testing Animal testing has been a controversial topic for many generations throughout the world. People against animal testing say that animal
testing is cruel and inhumane and...show more content...
Animals are also tested with "Repeated force feeding tactics" (11 Facts about....). Repeated force feeding involves forcing animals to eat certain
substances over and over just for observation. What is the point in this? Another experiment performed on animals is killing pregnant animals and
examining and experimenting on the fetuses. Killing a mother and killing a baby that hasn't even been born yet is wrong and it should be
stopped. Killing an animal for no reason is cruel. That's a life you are taking away. Just imagine if it was you. Animals should only be killed for
food, not to be used for testing. Animals can be burned, crippled, poisoned, and abused as a result of testing. And the list could go on forever. The
way animals are being mistreated and tested on should be against the law. There is a different ways to do research other than killing and abusing
animals. There are many alternate test that scientist can use to do there research without harming animals. Alternative test are defined as test that use
the three "R's", a test that replaces a procedure that uses animals with one that doesn't, a test that reduces the number of animals used in a procedure,

and test that refine a procedure to cause less pain to the animal.(11 Facts about...) Animal testing causes millions and millions of dollars to go down
the drain each year. It's a shame to see American Tax payer's money go to no use. The National Institute of Health holds back 14 to 16 billion

Animal Testing Is Unnecessary Essay
Do you love animals? Then help stop animal experimentation. Animal experimentation is the use of non–human animals in research and development
projects for purposes of determining the safety of substances such as foods or drugs(Dictionary.com). Animals have been used repeatedly throughout
medical history to be tested on to find cures. Animal experimentation is unnecessary due to the technology today and it needs to stop.
Animal experimentation is not necessary anymore as a result of technology that has been created. For example, 3D skin printing was invented. 3D skin
can speed up drug development by replacing animal testing. Bloomberg reported that "Today, about 60 scientists work in the L'Oreal laboratories in
Lyon, France, using tissue donated...show more content...
It is unnecessary as long as there is new technology that can replace this testing. It is cruel that we are putting these animals through this when we're
just going to put the humans through it afterward. According to Medical Testing "Ninety–two percent of drugs–those that have been tested on animals
and in vitro–do not make it through Phase 1 of human clinical trials." Medical Testing also said, "Many charities–including the March of Dimes, the
American Cancer Society, and countless others–use donations to fund experiments on animals." The majority of animal experiments do not contribute
to improving human health, unfortunately.
There is an advantage for animals. If that animal has a disease and they find a cure, that's great. They can now cure the animals of that disease which is
a great information for the animals. However, most times the cure is found by injecting that disease into them. It is excellent for vets now that the
disease has a cure. The vets can now use the cure to cure other animals.
Animal experimentation is not necessary anymore due to modern day technology. New technology is built all the time now. Some of that technology
can be used to end experimenting. What is the point of experimenting on animals if it doesn't always apply to humans? The testing is cruel. If you love
animals, then take a stand. Stop animal

Thesis Statement On Animal Testing
Position/thesis statement Animal testing is a horrible way to test products because its extremely cruel to the animals used. Scientists everywhere are
using animals to test there products. "There could be as high as 115,000,000 animals per year used in testing, most of them get *euthanized at the end
of the experiment". According to the article this house would ban animal testing from ideabate.org. "research on living animals have been practiced
since 500 B.C." Think about how many animals that have been used! First of all, animals are being taken away from there homes to be used for
testing. Secondly, research can be done effectively without harming ananimal or human. Lastly, animal research causes harm to the animal. All of my
reasons...show more content...
I think that is not true because animals just dont have as much of a way to express to us that its hurting them, some animals used cant even make a
sound wich is very hard for the animal not being able to show there in pain.
Pro– also from the passage this house would ban animal testing, they explain how animal testing is killing millions of animals in a horrible way.
Chemist corner estimates that in 10–20 years animal testing will be ban because of the majority of the people against animal testing, for example 23%
of the people are strongly against animal testing, that number every day is growing.
Animal research causes more harm than people think it does.
Summation On the other hand, according to research, animal testing can be beneficial because it can be very accurate, and its less painful for an
animal than for a human. However, The positives for not using animal testing outweighs the negatives. Animal testing should be banned because
animals are being taken away from there homes to be used for testing, research can be done effectively without harming an animal or human, animal
research causes harm to the animal. In conclusion animal testing is a horrible way to test products and should be

Cons Of Animal Testing Essay
The Cons of Animal Testing
Can you imagine being locked up in a cage with no control over anything? Not even when you eat? That is how life is like for an animal in research
labs. They are abused and the lab researchers don't care. Even though there are a very few benefits to using animals for research, there are many
benefits for not using them. Animal testing is costly, animals are mistreated, and there are many other safe alternatives. To begin with, animal testing is
very costly and more expensive than alternate methods. The US National Institute of Health (NIH) has an animal budget of $31 billion and for animal
research they spend an average of $14 – $16 billion annually. I think that all this money being used for animal testing could be used for other important
...show more content...
Instead of abusing animals while testing, there are many other methods such as computer modeling, human volunteers, cell–based tests and tissue
models. "A variety of cell–based tests and tissue models can be used to assess the safety of drugs, chemicals, cosmetics, and consumer products."
("Alternatives to Animal Testing"). Not all tests can be reliable, such as identifying chemicals that cause birth defects or allergic reaction, but scientists
are trying to develop methods (Curren). The quality and humanness of testing will improve if animals are replaced by vitro methods. These tests will
often be cheaper, quicker, and more effective ("Alternatives to Animal Testing"). The study of naturally occurring disease and the health in humans is
called epidemiology. The results of this study has provided researchers and health practitioners with an understanding of causes, treatments, and
preventions of a range of human illnesses and no animals were mistreated as a result ("Animals in Science/Alternatives"). Animals can stop suffering
and dying from these experiments if these alternatives are used more

Essay on Animal Testing
Biology and Behavior Animal testing is not a problem in today's society because it is beneficial to humans. It seems unethical to put animals through
such pain and torture, but if we stopped it completely there would be a large amount of human lives lost. How could this be? The further
advancements in medical and technological science is inevitable. Therefore, if the testing must be done to learn more about the brain and body, which
species (animals or man) seems expendable for such testing.
The real question is which species is more ethical to test on. For example, a rat is given an injection with a drug and watched regularly for the period of
a month. At the end of the month the rat is injected with a lethal toxin and dissected for...show more content...
There has been so much learned due to animal testing that the consequences of using animals for experiments far out weighs the notion to stop using
them. Vaccines, health problems, and theories of the brain works have all come about from animal testing. For example, a researcher named Jose
Delgado implanted an electrode in a particular spot of the hypothalamus of a bull bred for bull fighting. The experiment returned the result that
aggression can be turned on or off by stimulating certain areas of the hypothalamus. Also, the sensation of pleasure can be produced when the right
place of the hypothalamus is stimulated (Wood & Wood,1999, p. 47–48).
Knowledge such as this could only have come about through experiments with animals. The knowledge obtained can now be recorded and used for
other purposes. On the other hand, what if the electrode were implanted on a human, and the human died as a result of the experiment. Which animal
(man or bull) is a greater loss to the society? The humans unexpected death will be mourned by family and relatives for years to come.
On the other side there are those activists as well as average citizens that see animal testing as a wrong doing. They believe that there is no cause
worthy enough to put the animals through such large amounts of cruelty. In fact there are large groups of people that spend their lives

Audience Analysis: Animal Testing
Audience Analysis: Animal Testing
After Conducting my audience analysis, I found that 5 out of 9 members of my audience are neither against or for Animal testing. Two members of
my audience are for animal testing and the last two believe it shouldn't even be allowed. After looking at this information I have concluded that my
target audience will be those who are indecisive on whether animal testing is or isn't a problem, as well as the ones that approve testing on animals. By
knowing whom my audience is going to be, I decided that my speech will be a strengthening commitment speech. I want to convince those that are not
completely against it, that we have different alternatives that can be used and that animals should not be put through such

Animal Testing Ethics Essay
When people experiment on animals that is characterized to be very unethical for the safety of the animals being tested on. In that substance, a
cosmetic company using animals such as rabbits to test the irritancy levels of its products eyes for the purposes of making nonirritating cosmetics for
women who will use such products is by far unethical and wrong. Because treatment brings pain and discomfort to the animals in testing. I also support
the moral idealism that "humans do not have the right to capture animals against their will and subject them to life–threatening experiments" (Neu,
2012). I feel that all animals should be given a full and healthy life and not be mistreated in any way. And using rabbits or any creatures for testing for

Research Paper On Animal Testing
Is it right to use animals as experiments? Repeatedly throughout history animals have been used for biomedical research. Animal protection and animal
rights groups have severely criticized the practice of using animals for biomedical research in its recent years. To make the practice of animal testing
more 'humane', laws have been passed in several countries People against animal testing have contended that the benefit to humans does not justify the
harm to animals. People believe that animals are extremely different to humans, thus show that the results from animals cannot be applied to humans.
People supporting animal testing argue that the experiments on animals are necessary to advance medical and biological knowledge. The issues of
'cruelty' to animals and the humane treatment of animals are valid concerns in experimentation is greatly regulated. However, if animal testing is
completely eliminated, the development of essential medical devices, medicines, and treatment will significantly be set back. Learning more about the
health problems that can affect both humans and animals, and making sure that the new medical treatments are safe to use is what modern scientist are
trying to do with animal testing. Before they can find ways to treat them, medical researchers need to understand the...show more content...
Animals used in experiments are commonly subjected to forced feeding, forced inhalation, food and water deprivation, prolonged periods of physical
restraint, the infliction of bumps and other wounds, the infliction of pain, and killing by carbon dioxide an asphyxiation, along with neck–breaking,
decapitation, and other animal mistreatment. Animals suffer like humans. Whether its humans or animals, all suffering is undesirable. Just because
animals do not have the cognitive ability, language, or moral judgment that humans do, it is no more justifiable than discriminating against human
beings with severe mental

Animal Testing Argumentative Essay
As a scientist opens the rusty cage door, the fuzzy hamster bolts to the very edge so that the scientist would have trouble getting the mouse out. The
hamster squeals, cries, and shivers, as the huge hand wraps around its body pulling the hamster out of the cage. As soon as the hand releases the
hamster, the scientist injects numerous amounts of chemicals into it. The chemicals are so toxic that the mouse lost its life instantly. Even though
many researchers chose to use animal testing, that is one of the many ways of research. Animal testing should no longer be needed since there are
better, alternative ways to research without harming live animals.
Many people think that animal testing is a way of research where no harm is done towards the animal. Actually, animal testing is a highly used way of
research where scientists give either kill an animal instantly or make the animals suffer. There are many ways of preforming an animal test. One could
be which you are a professional scientist that works in the lab and performs research on...show more content...
One of the most common animals that is used in a school dissection is the frog species. Frogs as well as many other animals at first are bread so
there are more frogs to be used for a dissection. After that the frogs are placed in these barrels where shortly their death will approach them ().
Once they are deceased, they are sent to classrooms where students research on their bodies and the parts within them. Most dissections are used to
teach a lesson or to prove something. When I dissected a frog for the first time, I was really confused and did not know what to do. Even with my
teacher's assistance, I made several mistakes as well as my fellow classmates since we are unexperienced. My science class as well as many other
classes all over the world dissect in class and do not know what they are doing! It's like a surgeon not knowing how to perform a

History of Animal Testing Essay
Animal Testing is when people use animals in experiments, to test their reaction to what is being tested. The range of animals used in testing is from
tens of millions to more than a hundred million used annually. There has been much debate about this topic, because, animals are the most reliable
sources to use, especially mice, because we share 95% of our genes with them, which makes them the most common animals to use. Although, many
people think animal testing is crude and inaccurate science, but the other hand is, would we rather use humans?
Animal testing has been going on since 500BC, found in ancient Greek writing. People believed that animals were lacking intelligence so it didn't
matter to them. Although, Theophrastus disagreed,...show more content...
Viv sectors are the scientists and doctors that perform animal testing. An average day at work for them is poisoning, shocking, burning, and killing
animals. Humans have found specific animals that they are testing, and they have always been testing on these animals. Humans have always been
testing on animals, and they have never even thought of testing on humans. We have been using innocent animals for our own products, which only
use humans are going to be using, so why are we using animals? The only reason why we are using animals is because we are too selfish to use
ourselves. There have been many surveys and research on what we humans think about this. Many people have mentioned that it isn't fair because
animals can't show or tell us their pain. Although, some people feel that it is completely necessarily to test on animals because otherwise, we wouldn't
have had all the medicine we have, and many more products would have been unsafe to use.
During an interview between DoSomething.org and Nancy Beck Ph.D. and the science and policy adviser at Physicians Committee for Responsible
Medicine, the question asked was "Why can't most animals be put up for adoption after they're testing is finished?" and Nancy Beck replied "Animals
are often killed as part of the test, in order to determine whether there has been any toxicity to their internal organs". This shows that most animals who
get put into animal testing never come back out, they are ended up

Animal Testing Research Paper
Animal testing goes back to the Greeks in 4th and 3rd centuries, with Aristotle and Erasistratus among the first to perform experiments on living
animals. Using birds, mice, eels, snails, and flies early physicist conducted experiments trying to discover cures for illness. In the 18th century a
physicist by the name of Antoine Lavoisier, used a guinea pig in a calorimeter to demonstrate that respiration was a form of combustion. Later on Luigi
Galvani demonstrated that electricity applied to a dead, dissected, frog's leg muscle caused it to twitch. It wasn't until the 1880's and 1890's that
physicists made medical advances, Emil von Behring isolated the diphtheria toxin and demonstrated its effect in guinea pigs. He went to demonstrate
immunity...show more content...
There are a variety of cell based tests and tissue models that can be used to access the safety of drugs, chemicals, cosmetics, and consumer products.
Recently a company has came up with a tissue model called an EpiDerm which is a 3–dimentional, human cell–derived skin model that replicates key
traits of normal human skin which can replace guinea pigs or mice who would have been injected with substances to determine an allergic response.
This may also replace rabbits in irradiation test. In silico is an advanced computer modeling program that stimulates biology and progression of
developing diseases. Study shows that the models can predict the ways that new drugs will react with the human body and replace the use of animals.
Using human volunteers is called "microdosing" may provide vital information on safety of an experimental drug. Volunteers are given a small one
time drug dose and are monitored to see how the drug behaves in the

Animal Testing
An estimated 26 million animals are used every year in the United States for scientific and commercial testing (PROCON.ORG, 2015) and More than
4 million animals are experimented on inside British laboratories in 2012 (ANIMAL AID, 2014). Killing animals by laboratory experiments generates
a lot of anxiety about the future of wildlife, which led to the writing of this essay. In the beginning of this essay, It will discuss both Points of View
against testing on animals. After that it will demonstrate review of cruelty and brutality suffered by the experimental animals. It will then focus on the
alternative methods and finally It will be shown that testing on animals is out of date. In spite of the practice of experimenting on live animals gives

Animal Testing Persuasive Essay
Throughout history, animal experimentation has played an important role in leading to new discoveries and human benefits. However, what many
people tend to forget are the millions of animals that are tortured or killed during the process of these painful, deadly experiments. Many people seem to
misunderstand animal nature and the laboratory procedures and techniques that are executed on the animals. The procedures are cruel, unreliable, and
harmful. Luckily there are more humane alternatives that have also proved to be less expensive.
I assume many of you have pets including cats, dogs, rabbits, and mice. Imagine yourself as your pet, but instead of living in a warm home with a
caring family, you live locked up in a small metal cage,...show more content...
Some might even consider it abuse. It is something that goes unnoticed every day because of the benefits that humans gain from it. Animal testing is
overshadowed by advancements in the medical field. However, no product or medicine makes it acceptable.
Just because humans are considered a more powerful species, doesn't give us the right to treat animals as if they are nothing. Would you want to be
treated that way by a more dominant species just for their benefit? It is clearly unfair. If you pull your cat's tail, it yells because it hurts. Animals
experience pain. They go through the same pain that we would if we were subjected to painful, deadly experiments. Whether it's a dog, cat, rabbit,
mouse, chimpanzee, or human, pain is something we all feel.
However, when you compare the anatomy of a cat to that of a human, you can find numerous differences, making animal testing unreliable and
sometimes even dangerous. Some might say that animal testing is crucial to scientific research but how can something be so crucial if the results are
not even completely accurate?
Luckily, there are alternatives for animal testing including computer models, cell structures, and human testing. Although some may argue that
computer models and cell structures are unreliable, so is animal testing. You are given the choice between two unreliable methods, except in one, you
are not killing an innocent creature. Human testing is also a more just method. If the results are

Argumentative Essay On Animal Testing
Animal Testing
Animals all over the world are being mistreated and abused, what have we done to help them? Over many years animal testing has developed life
saving techniques. Though it has taken the lives of over 2.6 million animals lives just in the us alone. Animal testing is a growing issue throughout the
entire world, not only is it affecting the lives of the animals, but the people who use the products too. It may not physically be hurting them, but more
so emotionally. The moral issue is that no animal has a voice and we need to speak up for them.
Animals cannot speak up for their rights so the only way to stop the testing is for us humans too step up and carry their voice. The Humane Society has
already begun the descend into the...show more content...
Animals are a thing of the past to be tested on. New ground breaking programs have shown us that technology is an amazing creation that is allowing
us to grow human skin and conduct tests on it. This will also avow us to stop experimenting products on animals, conveying a more authentic
conclusion. Kara Rogers acknowledges the use of other variables of testing in her article, "Scientific Alternatives to Animal Testing: Progress Report"
that, "Artificial human skin, such as the commercially available products EpiDerm and ThinCert... More useful results than testing chemicals on
animal skin" (Rogers). Animals can not be replicated o test on to get accurate results. So this indicates the push for using something more similar to
human skin which can bring a better outcome to lab results. Animal testing is a growing issue throughout the entire world and the main issue is
animals do not have a voice to speak their rights. We currently do have the technology to test products on them without harming anyone or anything.
The Humane Society points out that animals are, " Force feeding, forced inhalation" they have their necks broken and more, the list is endless. Their
rights need to be protected and our voice is theirs. "only certain animals are protected by the AWA (Animal welfare Act)" meaning some animals lives
are

Animal Testing Essay
Critics argue that researching and testing on animals is necessary as it leads to many medical advances and breakthroughs. Some medical advances that
have resulted from animal testing include blood transfusions, insulin, antibiotics, asthma medicine, vaccines, transplants, numerous drugs, Parkinson's
disease, and chemotherapy. Although new valuable information has been gained from animal research, times have changed and there are now more
humane ways to do research. In Vitro testing, computer modeling, and human–patient simulators are some of the alternative methods that can replace
animal testing. In Vitro methods use human cells and tissues to study diseases and test products. There are two types of In Vitro methods: Organ on
chips and 3–D printing human skin. Organ on...show more content...
3–D printing human skin replicates human tissue and allows for the printing of body parts including heart valves, ears, bone, and skin. These replicated
tissues replace the need for animal testing. Computer modeling, another method to replace animal testing, has the ability to simulate human biology and
accurately predict how drugs will react in the human body. Amy Clippinger, a cellular and molecular biologist at PETA states, "Computer models have
saved millions of animals from suffering in toxicity and drug testing experiments" (PETA). Computer models provide a great alternative to testing on
animals and is way more humane. The third alternative is human–patient simulators that can give accurate biological responses to medications and
diseases, ultimately replacing the need for crude animal tests. All three alternatives–In Vitro testing, computer modeling, and human–patient
simulators– are more reliable, less costly, and have the power to advance medical research and lead to new breakthroughs. Therefore, despite what
critics say, animal testing is no longer

Essay On The Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Featured

Featured (20)

Essay On The Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing