This presentation details the process and criteria by which tenure reform research sites were selected as part of CIFOR's Global Comparative Study in Indonesia. Topics include selection criteria (status of tenure reform, community attributes, willingness of stakeholder participation) and an overview of selected sites.
Get Premium Attur Layout Call Girls (8005736733) 24x7 Rate 15999 with A/c Roo...
Research design in Indonesia: Overview of potential sites
1. Research design in Indonesia:
Overview of potential sites
Inception Workshop: GCS-Tenure Project
Mani Ram Banjade, Nining Liswanti, Tuti Herawati and Esther Mwangi3rd July, 2014
2. Outline
Site selection criteria
Site selection process
Key actors consulted
Diversities considered
Overview of sites and key features
3. Site selection criteria
A. Status of tenure reform
• Diversity of social forestry regimes
• Current status: formalisation, tenure reform implementation
• Tenure security
• Diversity of actors
B. Community attributes
• Community diversity: Adat, immigrants and mixed
• Customary institutions
C. Willingness of local stakeholders to participate in the research
4. Site selection process
Preliminary information through available
literature and data: MOF, FORDA
Consultation with experts
Site selection visits: discussion with
community, district and provincial level
authorities
Observation of sites and events
Review of data based on:
• Preliminary interaction with various
actors
• Additional data from MOF, provinces
and districts
7. Maluku visit
Province level:
Forestry Agency,
Forest Gazettment Agency (BPKH),
Regional Planning Agency (BAPPEDA),
Nature Resource Conservation Agency
(BKSDA),
Forest Resource Conservation Agency
(KSDH),
Watershed Management Agency (BPDAS),
National Land Agency (BPN),
State Enterprice Agency (Kapet Seram),
AMAN, and
Agriculture Faculty of UNPATTI
District level:
• Forestry Agency,
• Regency Secretary
(SEKDA),
• Regional Planning
Agency (BAPPEDA),
and
• National Land Agency
(BPN)
Village level:
• Kamariang village
8. Lampung Visit
Province level:
Forestry Agency (Dinas
Kehutanan)
Land Use Planning Agency
(BAPPEDA), and
Attended a HKm Workshop
Community level:
• HKm Farmer Group in
Sumber Djaya
• Kubu Prahu (a community
adjacent to the Bukit Barisan
National Park)
• Pahmongan Village (Damar
Tapping)
9. Capturing diversity: Basis of
district selection
Presence of social forestry schemes: HKM, HTR, Hutan Desa,
Hutan Adat
Specific Purpose Zone (KDTI) (Lampung only)
Status of implementation of tenure reform
Community diversity: e.g. traditional, immigrants and mixed
10. Land tenure status (individual,
clan, village)
Certification (before, now, none)
Concession (before, now, none)
Migrants (before, now, none)
Landscape position (coastal,
mountain)
Tenure history:
- before reform (colonial,
concession)
- After reform (HKM, HTR,
KPH)
Capturing diversity:
Basis of selection of
communities
11. Overview of sites
Seram Barat Lampung Barat
Total Land Area 6.948 Sq. Km 2.064,4 Sq. Km
Total Forest Area 659.000 Ha (95%) 126.956,27 Ha (61,50%)
HKm Yes (formalization process
has started)
Yes (implementation)
HTR No Yes
Hutan Desa No No
KPH Yes Yes
Total Population 180.398 280.307 ha
12. District wise status of social forestry
schemes in Lampung
District HKm HTR Hutan Desa Hutan Adat
Lampung Barat Y Y - Y
Lampung Utara Y - - -
Tanggamus Y - - -
Lampung Tengah Y - - -
Lampung Timur Y - - -
Way kanan Y - - -
Lampung Selatan Y - Y -
Pesawarn Y - - -
Pringsewu Y - - -
13. 0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
HKm Area (ha)
Only five out of 13 districts have started implementing HKm. Four others included here
have started the process but yet to finish formalization
HKm Implementation Status in Lampung Province
0
5
10
15
20
25
30 26
6
14
24
0
5
0 0 0
HKm groups in the districts of
Lampung Province
No. of HKm…
14. Presence of different schemes in the districts
of Lampong Province (ha)
-
2,000.00
4,000.00
6,000.00
8,000.00
10,000.00
12,000.00
14,000.00
16,000.00
18,000.00
Tanggamus Lampung Barat Way Kanan Lampung
Utara
Lampung
Tengah
HKm
HTR
Hutan Adat
15. Key features: Lampung Barat
15 sub-districts, 136 villages, 67% of them adjacent to the
protection forests and Bukit Barisan Selatan National Park
High exposure to external actors: NGOs, Research
Institutions
Information from earlier works
Pioneering HKm
KDTI
Elite capture
16. Key features: West Seram
92 Desa; Immigrants in 15 Desa
Limited external intervention
Previous experience of logging and mining
Strong Adat communities and Adat institutions
Strong support of government agencies for
strengthening community rights
18. Contrasting features
Strength of Adat Institutions
Implementation status of various social forestry schemes
External intervention
Presence of Civil Society Organisations
19. Complementing
Lampung: Inform Maluku on processes of establishing social
forestry schemes (HKm, Hutan Desa, HTR) and Hutan Adat
Maluku: Insights on how and under what conditions
customary authorities can manage forests
Esther provided you a brief overview of the project and Ibu Mia presented the key tenure issues in Indonesia based on her reviews. I am now taking you to the field. The field here I mean to say is provinces, districts and communities. I will first mention the key criteria for selecting the sites followed by the process we adopted as part of site selection. Then I show you which actors were consulted during the site selection visits. In order to understand more holistically about the forest tenure in Indonesia, our attempt has been to capture as much diversity as possible both in terms of types of tenure reform that exist and also the diversity of communities present. Then I will discuss about the key features of the potential sites and basis of their likely selection. And finally, I will show you the comparative and complementing aspects between the selected sites.
Three main criteria were used to select the research sites. The first is related to types of tenure reform and tenure security, second is community attributes, and third is stakeholders’ willingness to collaborate with or support the research. In case of tenure reform, we would like to take on board as many social forestry regimes as possible. As one of the key components of the research is understanding the tenure reform implementation, we wanted to have at least some sites from each regime to have some experience of tenure reform implementation. Aspects such as tenure security and diversity of actors was also considered. In terms of community attributes, we would like to get the better sense of types of communities such as Indigenous, immigrants and mixed living in the coastal areas and those living up in the hills.
Initial selection of provinces for the purpose of site selection visits was done based on the data received from MOF, FORDA and other literature, as well as consultation with the experts. Then we visited Maluku, West Kalimantan and Lampung provinces and discussed with several actors from community, district and province level. Initially we visited Maluku and West Kalimantan. We thought that there were at least few HKm and Hutan Desa that have few years of implementation experience but after site selection visit we found that it would be too early to evaluate the outcomes of implementation. Then we decided to go to Lampung as from the existing literature we knew that we would get sites that have implemented some of the schemes for several years.
In Maluku we talked with several government agencies, AMAN and UNPATTI at the province level, talked to government agencies at the district level and visited a village. In the village we talked to Raja and his wife and visited the forest gardens.
In Lampung, we collected data from the existing literature and talked with a couple of government agencies. We also attended a multi-stakeholder HKm workshop participated by the community leaders, government agencies, NGOs and academics. We visited three villages in Lampung Barat district.
Ok, so far I have briefly explained you about site selection criteria and site selection process. Our aim is to get as much diversity as possible within a district. The diversity in terms of social forestry schemes, status of implementation and presence of diverse communities was considered.
Within the communities, diversity in land tenure status, status of the certification of the social forestry schemes, experience of concession, presence of immigrants, landscape position and tenure history are primarily considered
Hutan Desa is under formalisation process in Lampung Selatan District only
In lampung province, these are the districts that have either started HKm implementation already or are in the process of certification. In the next slide I will show you the districts that have been implementing HKm.
HKm implementation started in 2007 after formalization process was completed. The left chart shows the number of HKm groups and right chart shows the total area under HKm.
This chart shows the presence of different social forestry schemes under implementation. It is clear that Lampung Barat is the only district that has schemes also other than HKm. One of the strong bases for us to consider Lampung Barat.
We will use stratified random sampling to select the villages within West Seram District for the purpose of data collection.