The Approach Of Nonviolence Essay

The Approach of Nonviolence Essay
"An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind" (Mahatma Gandhi), welcome to the world of non–violence, not similar to 'disney land' but merely a
small philosophical village coated in white, decorated with crystals and abundant in doves; white resembling peace, crystals for clarity and pure spirit
and doves for .. I don't know, I guess I have been driven by my imagination.
There is a considerable debate about the precise meaning of nonviolence. Some people believe that nonviolence is a philosophy and strategy for social
change that rejects the use of violence. In other words, nonviolence is a method for resolving a conflict without the use of physical power nor enmity
towards opponents. Instead, it emphasizes you to look beyond...show more content...
Day by day humans tend to be inhuman; selfishness, cruelty, hatred, jealousy and materialism have ripped off the warmth from our lives making it
cold and unsafe. A man may allow himself a wide latitude in the matter of diet and yet may be a personifier of ahimsa and compel our homage, but a
man who is always over–scrupulous in diet is an utter stranger to ahimsa and pitiful wretch, if he is a slave to selfishness and passions and is hard of
heart. (Gandhi, The Gospel of Non–Violence)
Gandhi expresses the problem of selfishness and greed among humans, thus turning themselves into slaves for power, wealth and fame. Allah the all
mighty talks about this very same point in his holy Quran by saying "We have certainly created man in the best of stature" (At–tin 95:4) and he also
says "Indeed, We guided him to the way, be he grateful or be he ungrateful." (Al–insan 76:3), although the literal meaning of these scriptures may seem
different, but the true meaning needs explanation, and those two scriptures meant that Allah all mighty, have created human beings free; not obliged
by any person or anything. But humans blinded by their greediness, became slaves for materialistic assets forgoing morality, knowledge and wisdom.
And to defeat all this, we need to practice nonviolence as a way of living, because it will help us to retain the forgone moral possessions which are the
key ingredients for a peaceful, truthful,
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Non Violence Research Paper
"Non–violence is the greatest force at the disposal of mankind. It is mightier than the mightiest weapon of destruction devised by the ingenuity of
man," as stated by Mahatma Gandhi, a proponent of civil disobedience. Brilliantly defined in his mind as self–control gives one more power than what
any violence could do as giving into violence is easier. Protests take place for humanitarian reasons and for looking out for the little guy. They are
done and meant for the welfare of the cause in order to gain rights or achieve a goal. In the following paragraphs explains how beneficial peaceful
resistance is to a free society. How the rally of people brings more people to the cause and bringing more people in can launch controversy and change
forethought...show more content...
Political and social ideas sway along with the people. The reason for the Preamble of the Constitution is to justify what our Founding Fathers wanted
for this country: to be authorized by the consent of the people. We the people are allowed to execute beliefs in order to set right what is in our mind.
Looking at the impact of the suffragette movement one can see that the life of a women and the role of a woman in day–to–day society has shifted
from not having much freedom and say into ideologies such as feminism. Without the beginning of a strong advance as such and women talking a
strong and independent lifestyle as they were in their day, women today would never be able to hope for an egalitarian society. Famous individuals
use their celebrity to bring attention to causes that may otherwise be underserved. During the SAG awards many actors and actresses spoke out
against Donald Trump`s ban and deportation of Muslims back to their homelands of which some are now war zones. Celebrities as popular as
Angelina Jolie, who is a Special Envoy for the UN Commissioner for Refugees, brings to the public eye undergoing projects of helping those in need.
This gathers individuals to take part in something bigger than themselves and act in the well–being of the society they are in support

Martin Luther King Non Violence Resistance
After watching those two videos, I strongly believe in non–violence resistance. In order for a social movement to have a greater impact on society, it is
better not to use violence. As the book says, if the cost of making some concessions are so threatening to elites, however, that they may decide to
fight hard and even violently against a movement for years or even decades (Luders 2010). Relating to this quote, Martin Luther King said that even
if black people use violence, they will end up losing the battle because either they will be arrested, or they will be killed. Just as Martin Luther King, I
am a strong believer in non–violence resistance. I believe it will have a bigger impact and influence on the opponent. The use of violence hinders

Nonviolence Vs Non Violence
Yes, nonviolence can be more dangerous than violence to a ruling class. Although the results in both situations will be very different. Using violence
may bring the result they want but it would only be put in place because of fear. Less people could be hurt because it would bring the message they
are trying to send faster but it will be taken the wrong way. People from both sides will be killed and the British people in India would not understand
what they were doing was an injustice that should be corrected. It would instead be seen as a hateful act brought upon the brutal Indians. They would
end up building a tense, hateful relationship with each other that will last for a long time. The British will be justified in using physical force

The Pros And Cons Of Nonviolence
Nonviolence is the use of peaceful methods instead of force, to bring political or social change. However, practicing nonviolence is much more difficult
than this short definition. Also, people may argue that why just using force against force? If using violence is more efficient, why bother to use
nonviolence? Furthermore, using violence is more easy and direct, but nonviolence requires more strategy and effort to really make progress. The
truth is, using force against force rarely worked, and it's never really brought political and social improvement to reach the positive peace in the
society. In the World War II, the United State dropped two nuclear bombs on Hiroshima Japan, and lead to many unnecessary deaths and nuclear
radiation for many years after the explosion. Then, if not using force to return, what should we do to deal with the extreme violence? What is the most
efficient nonviolence method to do when you face a brutality?
There are three types of violence: political violence to intimidate, physical violence to terrorize and mental or emotional violence to undermine
(Elworthy, 2012). All three of them have the same propose: use violence to put themselves above other people. Using force to scare other side and let
them surrender. However, the 'perpetrator' is much more scarred than the 'victim'. Aung San Suu Kyi, the peaceful freedom fighter in Burma. When she
was leading a group of students on a protest in the streets of Rangoon. The soldiers came around and

The Civil Rights Movement brought many accomplishments to African Americans such as the 1964 Civil Rights Act, Voting Rights Act of 1965, and
the Fair Housing Act of 1968. The key issues that African Americans fought for were voting rights, integration and racial equality. They were tired of
the discrimination and humiliation they received as a result of the segregation laws imposed on them. "State laws mandated racial separation in
schools, parks, playgrounds, restaurants, hotels, public transportation, theaters, restrooms and so on" (Blumberg 40). Lawsuits had been tried to gain
rights such as the unsuccessful Plessy v. Ferguson in 1896 and the successful Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka. Although, the Brown v. Board of
Education of...show more content...
The strategy of violence was a divisive force in the Black community; many African American protestors were indecisive in which way to fight for their
rights.
Violence also proved to be unproductive because it only caused more resistance and chaos in time of confrontation. Violent protests such as riots ended
up damaging the Black Community. African Americans resulted being the victims of these riots, and as a result the most affected by the violent
confrontations. Moreover, the use of violence created stiff race relations between the African Americans and White. Demonstrating that the violence
method was ineffective for the civil rights movement is the fact that the "Black power movement faded almost as quickly as it appeared" (Ware 161).
The nonviolence tactic was more effective than violence in the Civil Rights Movement because it caused many throughout the nation to feel sympathy
for the African American cause. Particularly, many White people began to sympathize with African Americans. Many joined organizations, thus
supporting various forms of protesting including sit–ins, pray–ins, wade–ins, marches, boycotts, rallies, and Freedom Rides (Blumberg 1).The
cooperative work between Whites and African Americans helped with the integration objective. In addition, the turmoil occurring throughout the
country drove the two presidents of

Non-Violence : Religion And Nonviolence
Many religions have doctrines that preach towards non–violence. Christians can look towards the Ten Commandments and see phrases such as "Thou
shalt not kill" and "Thou shalt not steal. The Buddha also believed in nonviolence seen through verse 130 of the Dhammapada when he was quoted as
saying "Putting oneself in another's place, one should not beat or kill others." However, the religion of Jainism considers non–violence paramount in
order to achieve enlightenment. In the teachings of Mahavira from the Acaranga Sutra, "all the omniscients of all times, state... that nothing which
breathes... should be destroyed or ruled over, or subjugated, or harmed, or denied of its essence or potential." Through the practice of nonviolence one
will be rid of karma already gained and stop new karma from being gathered, which leads to a reincarnation into a higher status.
In order to practice the values of nonviolence or ahimsa, one must first realize that all things have souls. Everything from a microscopic cell to a
human being has a soul and they must be protected, even elements are thought to have souls. Thus the killing of all types of life is considered
violence, also known as himsa, and this will give a person karma. In order to avoid this Jain's are not only are pacifists, but have extreme dietary
restrictions. Meat is not allowed in any form as it involved the slaughter of an animal. Root plants are considered sacrilege as they contain an infinite
number of souls within them,

Violence Vs Non Violence Essay
Peaceful resistance to laws positively impacts a free society. Rather than having violent movements and harming citizens, it is better to peacefully
resist. Once a violence is used, the resistance to the law becomes nulled. People tend to not follow a violence protester. Once a violent riot starts,
chaos is everywhere. People forget what they are truly fighting for. They unconsciously run away with the fear of getting harmed and dare not to go
back. A peaceful resistance on the other hand leads citizens to join and support. People are able to see what they are fighting for and their real
intentions. They are able to stand and cause no problem to people passing by as they are showing their support through silent voices. Many famous
activists and leaders are for nonviolence. Mahatma Gandhi, a primary leader of India's independence...show more content...
Blessed is the man who can perceive the law of ahimsa (nonviolence)" (Gandhi's Philosophy of Nonviolence). He believes that violence is never the
answer and that people should stay away from it. Violence will create another violence and there would be no end. Also, the government takes the
violence resistant harshly. They ignore people who cause disturbance to the society and to the citizens. Having a peaceful resistance, the government
sees the people and consider their resistance and try to come with a solution to satisfy their citizens. Another leader who was against for violence is
Martin Luther Kind Jr. He is one of the influential leaders in American's History. He stated that, "I have earnestly opposed violent tension, but there is
a type of constructive, nonviolent tension which is necessary for growth" ("Letter from a Birmingham Jail [King, Jr.]"). He also believes that "we who
engage in nonviolent direct action are not the creators of tension" ("Letter from a

World Peace and Nonviolence
World Peace and Non–violence
Ganadhipati Tulsi
Society consists of innumerable individuals having a common bond. That bond is mutuality. Plurality constitutes collectivity, but mere collectivity does
not become society without the bond of mutuality. Without a common thread the beads would not make a rosary and it is of utmost importance to
examine and evaluate the thread.
We live as part of society and the unit of society is the individual. Like individuals like society and vice versa. The above relationship is both ways true
but relatively so. In modern times, society is conceived in terms of economic conditions and their management. It is assumed that if the latter are good
the individual will be good too. Behind this assumption is the...show more content...
Disarmament does offer a solution to the problem of war, but it cannot offer an adequate solution in the absence of a proper study of the factors
leading to a war. And these factors are expansionism, the tendency of some countries to impose their political system and life style on others and the
mentality of universal proselytization. We must address ourselves to finding the ways of removing these factors if we want to prevent wars and
establish world peace.
Non–violence: The Eternal Religion
Non–violence is an eternal religion but we do not accept it as such. Though violence is a negative tendency and non–violence a positive one, for all
practical purposes we have changed their places. As a matter of fact a serious misunderstanding has arisen because of the word non–violence, since it is
taken to mean the negation of violence.. It has led people to believe that violence and not non–violence is an unavoidable part of life. The rigmarole of
violence automatically comes to an end once non–violence is understood to be an inevitable part of life.
Problem of Non–violence
It is not difficult to prove the proposition that man has accorded full recognition to the need for and usefulness of violence. Today thousands of
scientists are busy inventing destructive weapons and thousands upon thousands of soldiers are either undergoing training in the use of arms or staging
war rehearsals. Thus all the three activities –– research, training and practice are going on in

Nonviolence Conflict: Use Of Peaceful Means
Nonviolence Conflict
Nonviolence is the the use of peaceful means, not force, to bring about political or social change. Some conflicts can be solved without violence to
make a bigger change. One conflict that I have to try and solve is "Every day a person slaps a defenseless guy in the school hallways."
Gandhi philosophy of nonviolence would be the best choice for me to use to solve this, because he believed that to change a law, or in this case the
way someone treats another person, you have to change their hearts. I believe in this case gandhi's idea would work better, because Martin Luther
believe you had to change the laws first with a little bit of agitation, therefore I don't think Martin Luther king's idea wouldn't work, making

Essay On Non Violence
How did non violence help the equality in the world?
"Nonviolence is the greatest force at the disposal of mankind. It is mightier than the mightiest weapon of destruction devised by the ingenuity of man."
this is one of the most famous quotes from Mahatma Gandhi. Therefore, nonviolent conflicts is to win over the opposing side by peruading them into
agreeing on the subject that which the matter is presented. As a method of preforming a nonviolent conflict is that giving the opposing side to change
their mind or have to give the protesters wants and needs. For nonviolents conflicts does not want the opposing side to suffer but, they want them to
sweat in order to get what they want for the cause. Nonviolents shows that violents is nearly removes...show more content...
Where millions of african americans that fought to end the discrimination and segregation in the early 1960s. As Martin Luther King success of the
movement was his strategy of protesting that equal right are not born for just one race but, for all. As all theses protest for their equal rights they only
used non–violent as a way to win. As MLK supported this cause and lead it his inspiring approach on the alternative method on non–violent protest.
Where he was inspired by Mahatma Gandhi from his movement of their independence. For MLK led millions of african americans to the streets for
multiple peaceful protests as well as acts of civil disobedience, and boycotts. As the non–violent was acted in many places like Birmingham, Alabama.
Which during that time people where getting murdered, homes being set on fire and much worst just to see if they will fight back. As 1965 their was
a march for voting rights in Alabama as this is remembered as "Bloody Sunday." Where they went on the ,arch they just came towards them with night
sticks and with them releasing the tear gas. As they used the attack dog and fire hoses to stop the protesting of school children

What Made Non Violence Work
Gandhi and Mandela: What Made Non–Violence Work?
Background Essay The history of violence in the world is well documented. However it is also possible to use non–violence to bring about change.
This DBQ will look at two countries where a non–violent movement was successful.
Historic Context India and South Africa were two important nations on two different continents. But although they looked strong on the outside, each
one suffered from a disease that threatened the health of the whole. For India, the disease was colonization. For South Africa, it was racial segregation.
Three Conditions In each of these nations three conditions help explain why non–violence worked. The first condition was that both of them...show
more content...
This was the first time, though not the last, that
Mandela felt disrespected for his blackness.
In the 1930's it was rare for a black South African to attend college. But Mandela not only attended, he graduated, got a degree from law school, and
set up a practice in Johannesburg which he hoped could support his small family. Yet apartheid was always a humiliation to him. When the Afrikaner,
or Dutch South African, Nationalists came to power in the 1948 election, the segregation habits of the past three hundred years became law. Hoping for
a brighter future, Mandela joined the African National Congress (ANC) and became its first Youth Leader.
In the 1960s, many of the colonial nations of Africa were gaining independence. The ANC was encouraged and campaigned for democracy in South
Africa. They were mild campaigns at first, but as the government became more hostile, so did ANC protests. In November 1961, a military branch of
the party was organized with Mandela as its head. It authorized the limited use of arms and sabotage against the government, which got the
government's attention–and its anger! Mandela went into hiding in 1964, he was captured, tried, and sentenced to life imprisonment. It was a sad day
for black South Africa.
As days stretched to months, months to years,

Benefits Of Nonviolence Movement Essay
Imagine a world of peace where everyone is cheerful at any given time. People don't have to worry about danger or whether or not they lock their
doors at night. No one has to live in fear of anything ranging from bullying to terrorist attacks. Hurting people in any way is the last thing on one's
mind and being kind and helpful is the first. Now picture the current situation of the world. It is near impossible to go a day without at least one story of
violence on the news. People live in fear and dream of a "perfect world" of peace. Thanks to the Nonviolence Movement, this dream of a "perfect
world" can become a reality. This movement works towards using peaceful methods in any situation or to bring about political change. According
...show more content...
Even though individuals appreciate the positive intentions, they believe a world of peace is simply impossible and there will always be people in the
world with nothing but hate in their hearts. People aso believe war is necessary to bring about significant change. They speculate nothing will be
accomplished and people will simply be taken advantage of if they don't put up a fight. However, nonviolent methods have worked in the past. For
example, Gandhi led India to it's independence without bringing about harm. Despite the violent forces that battle him in the beginning, he and his
followers held out. Eventually, his opponents felt sympathy and gave in to his cause. His dedication showed the significant social poer this form of
struggle could create. In addition to Gandhi, there are other notable examples that successfully used nonviolence. A few are Rosa Parks, Martin Luther
King Jr., and college students that participated in sit–ins. Their actions and influence impacted history in a positive way, with several people of all ages
using them as role models. Although it would take a lot of time, patience, and dedication, a pure world of nonviolence is

Nonviolence Vs Non Violence Essay
Conflict is all around us. It's present around every corner, in every area, in every person. While conflict in itself is a consistent occurrence, the
response that we make as everyday people is much less consistent. Our responses usually amount to two different outcomes: violence or nonviolence.
Violence, in certain situations, is fairly unavoidable. However, violence should be put as a last resort in allconflict and should be approached with
nonviolence as often as possible. First off, there are events and issues that sometimes cannot be solved simply by the use of nonviolence. For
example, while war does nobody any good, if provoked enough it really can't be avoided. It's easier to say "nonviolence is the only way" when you're
dealing with conflict on a community scale or smaller. However, if there is conflict between whole countries, nonviolence will probably be a much less
effective solution. It could in fact lead to a much worse outcome! If one country attempt to raid or attack another, you can't really avoid chaos to ensue
within them. Evidently, violence, while wrong in most situations, is sometimes necessary when responding to much larger scale conflicts....show more
content...
For instance, if someone is attempting to inflict violence upon you, your action in response does not immediately mean you should fight back. It
clearly is wrong for them to attempt to attack you in the first place. Since they obviously already have been doing something wrong in the first place,
why would bring yourself down to the same level as them? Logically, it shouldn't make much sense to fight back since you don't need to at that
immediate moment, and this concept can be applied to many other situations within the world

Change Through Non-Violence
The best way to bring about change is through non–violence because violence is going to take you nowhere. Sometimes fighting for what is right
could be best for you and your community.In the article Ghandi did not want us fighting at all. He, Gandhi just wanted what was best for us , so he
tried doing what was actually best for us. An example would be when Gandhi asked parents to remove children from British–run schools.Still, Gandhi
never supported violent means. He believed peaceful protests worked better. Meanwhile when, Martin Luther King, Jr. fought discriminatory laws. He
led a bus boycott in Montgomery. He led boycotts against Alabama

Non Violence Vs Nonviolence Essay
Nonviolence seeks to defeat injustice not people. I believe that means we can defeat injustice and speak out without having to hurt others in the
process. There is so much violence in the world and we need to take a step forward as a community, nation, and one world. We will not survive in a
world of violence. In fact, we will destroy ourselves and there IS something you can do about it. Something our communities could do is compare and
contrast violence and nonviolence.
WE can be the difference in this world. That one principle could be a huge leap for us as humans. There is so much violence in this world and it is
killing us. My community alone is full of violence on a daily basis. Teens think it is cool to be the "tough one", "the one who can take anyone on". I
believe that is where violence is begun, the youth. Not only do the teens fight, but their younger siblings and peers look up to people like them and
become violent as teens and later adults. If we taught kids not to be violent and stressed that especially growing up it would definitely make a difference.
Another reason I think violence is as prominent as it is now may have to do with all the news broadcasts about police brutality and other violent
outbursts. Everyone was raised to "speak up for yourself' and "not let people push you...show more content...
If we were taught to be more loving and accepting of others we could do anything. However, someone has to make that first step for our
generation. We cannot rely on other people to do that for us. If we did it would never get done. One of my favorite quotes is by Mahatma Gandhi.
"There are many causes I would die for. There is not a single cause I would kill for." We all have causes we really care about and would do anything
for. There is just one thing we all need to remember: we are all human and are on this Earth for a reason, killing each other is not one of those

Non Violence
Hear them cry yet? "An eye for an eye will only make the whole world blind."Said by Mahatma Gandhi,who was a preeminent leader of the Indian
independence movement in British–ruled India. In my mind, violence is just a inferior product that had been produced by human relationship. Here,I
mean the bad relationship. I never find out violence can make a kind–hearted person turn into a muderer until I was 12 years old. During that year,I
read a book named Nonviolent Communication. So after I read this book,there was a question appeared in my mind "Why violence exist anyway?" In
USA,there were a lot of school shootings happened,I don't know how many exactly happened,but I know that must will be a big number,and there
were a lot of kids and teachers dead during each school shooting. I feel like there is something worng with US law, this is not the main point I want to
say,because I can not change the law.But actually, the spate of violent cases are breaking our heart. Compare to other countries like UK,Australia and
Canada,the frequency of school shooting is too high,I mean as a leading industrialized nation,America...show more content...
Isaac Asimov,who was a an American author and professor of biochemistry at Boston University.He said "Violence is the last refuge of the
incompetent."When you bulling them or just walking pass them and never care about them,ask yourself,did you think about their feeling,did you even
hear they were

Nonviolence Or Non-Violence?
"Nonviolence means avoiding not only external physical violence but also internal violence of spirit. You not only refuse to shoot a man, but you
refuse to hate him." Martin Luther King Jr., June 18th, 1956. Imagine a world with absolutely no crime. A world where everyone was nice to each
other and no one got bullied at school. What if racism didn't exist and nobody was judged for their beliefs. Do you see what's wrong with this
image? It simply isn't possible. We all want the world to be like this, however, the cold truth is that there will always be someone trying to put others
down out of resent. We can't have a perfect world. Nonetheless, it's striving for that perfect world that will make this one better. The only way we can
have this...show more content...
Therefore, not hating is simply not enough. If we see somebody in the halls being called names, being pushed around or being threatened, most of
us would just walk by without saying a word. However, we are also the same people who would then go home and complain and share a number of
posts about tragedies happening around the world. How do we justify these actions? Mahatma Gandhi once said "You must be the change you wish to
see in the world". If we want to evolve from this hate–filled society, we must start right here. It is imperative that we stop neglecting our problems,
show love for those around us and help everyone we

Non Violence Definition
Non–violence: The act of solving a dispute in a rational way that ends without violence from all sides of the quarrel.
Yes, I am very familiar with non–violence. When I think of non–violence, I definitely have someone in mind that I think of when the topic is brought
to attention. This person is my mother. My mother solves all of her problems with a non–violent solution. She uses non–violence as a way to resolve all
of her conflicts and meet goals she sets for herself. As my mother is a broker, she deals with private clients that invest their money in her in sometimes
stressful situations, so it is important for her to keep a calm mentality and deal with her clients in a way that does not provoke the client to make rash
decisions. My mother

The Approach Of Nonviolence Essay

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Buy Custom Paper Jacksonville

More from Buy Custom Paper Jacksonville (6)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

The Approach Of Nonviolence Essay