Against Animal Rights Essay

Animal Rights Thesis
Thesis: (All) Although some may not value animal rights, attention should be directed towards this
epidemic as animals' health and well–being affects us.
It is said that present laws have begun a revolutionary outlook on the way humans treat animals;
however, it is misplaced that a revolution to conserve animals' lives has truly done just that. In the
present age group, named Generation Peter Pan, a 'trend' of ending the reckless 'murdering' of
animals has been birthed to battle against cruelty– going vegan. Though it has halted the
overproduction of slaughter, it has failed in truly protecting, as well as securing, the rights of
animals in their life, liberty, and their pursuit of inevitable happiness. In Generation Baby Boomers,
their concerns lied elsewhere, in warfare and survival, causing little to none pursual of lawful
reaction to the deaths of animals....show more content...
They refuse to eat eggs, milk, and all other things coming from animals. Because of the animal
products being brutally forced from the bodies and systems of animals, there has been controversy
to the purposes of stopping this red meat and other sorts of production in this class of ages.
The Baby Boomer Generation and Generation X were both ages that failed to provide any greater
solutions to the animal rights epidemic. Baby Boomers had more on their mind than simply fighting
for the animals that gave them life. Consumed by war, greed was an efficient way of survival. In
Generation X, fashion statements were made through the use of fauxes and other items retrieved
from animals overall. Later in the 80's, a new era began where animals began to have more rights
than ever envisioned by the future
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Do Animals Have Rights?
Do Animals Have Rights?
Animals have rights, or at least they should. Animals are not for us to eat, experiments on, wear or
abuse in any which way. It is cruel to treat animals like they are not living souls. Animals are not
tools that we can use however we want. They too have hearts and brains like us humans. Therefore,
animals have all the rights to live their own lives without suffering and free from exploitation (Why).
Animal testing is performed for the making of human products. Even after hearing about the millions
of cases involving animal abuse, most animal abusing cases don't even get reported (Animal). Over
a hundred million animals are burned, skinned, beat, poisoned or abused in testing labs around the
US. Dogs are the most abused and experimented on animals. The pit bull species is on the rise. In
2001 pit bulls made up thirteen percent of the dog abuse cases. In 2007 pit bulls became twenty
five percent of the endangered dog species. Animals that are tortured for fur come from fur farms
where they are kept in cramped cages and are killed around six months old. People place the
animals in freezing temperatures so they would generate a thicker coat that can be used for the
making of fur products. Even if the animals die while the process, their coats can still be used
afterwards. Therefore, they show no mercy on how cold the temperature is in which the animals are
placed in. In china, the number one fur producer, animals are skinned alive for their fur coats.

Arguments Against Animal Rights
Animal Rights Many question on whether animals should have legal rights or not. To say that
animals should have rights is both ethical and unethical. The animal civil rights movement started in
1975. Civil disobedience was used as a tactic to gain public attention for their cause. It was argued
that since non–human animals cannot enter a social contract, they cannot possess any legal rights. To
say that people oppose the idea of animals being as free–willed as humans does not mean that they
are advocates for animal abuse; but it was declared immoral to give animals irrelevant and useless
rights that they would not understand. Those for animal rights certainly agree that the illegal
trafficking of animals is a good reason to fight for them. By them, i refer to rights, the same rights
we as humans have to keep us from being tortured and harmed. According to the database by Molly
McGinnis, "Thai officials in June discovered the bodies of 40 frozen tiger cubs inside a freezer at a
Buddhist monastery west of Bangkok." For hundreds of years animals have been killed and tortured
by poachers and hunters, and though the government cannot impose hunting restrictions in other
...show more content...
To give animals their rights would be saying that as human beings, we may not experiment on
animals, one cannot breed and kill animals for food or clothes or medicine. One cannot use animals
for hard labour, hunt, and cannot display the animal at a zoo or use them for any source of
entertainment. In the article "introduction to animal rights," by Joseph Lubinski, it states,"To the
law, animals are property: they are goods to be bought and sold, acquired and maintained." Human
beings have grown accustomed to emotionally attaching themselves to animals that once were solely
used for the purpose of hard labour. Advocates against animal rights do not agree that animals should
be treated with the same privileges a human being

Persuasive Essay Against Animal Rights
We live in a world today where people advocate for equal and fair treatment of all human beings,
regardless of race, culture, gender, or economic status. It would be unfair to the other counterparts on
this planet that are also living, breathing, and fully–functioning if we were to not consider or include
them in this kind of equality as well. Animal rights are defined as "the rights of animals to live free
from human exploitation and abuse," according to the English Oxford Dictionary. There is a
plethora of animal rights laws that have been passed worldwide, and these laws are supposed to be
strictly enforced to ensure the safety and well–being of all animals everywhere. However, there
seems to be a misunderstanding when it comes to animal...show more content...
The first activist was Bryan Pease, a lawyer and the founder of the Animal Protection and Rescue
League (APRL). Pease was one of the most influential people to call attention to the issue of
force–feeding and foie gras production in California. He was one of the four individuals that went
to Senoma Foie Gras Farm and took actual video footage of animal abuse, while also managing to
rescue four birds on the verge of death. While some may believe that force–feeding can be done
humanely, the video depicted thousands of birds packed in filthy crates defecating on each other,
rats eating the defenseless birds alive, and multiple trash cans filled with dead birds, which is
anything but humane. Arnold goes on to interview Dr. Elliot Katz, the founder of In Defense of
Animals, and asked for his medical opinion on force–feeding. Katz response compared
"force–feeding birds to a human that weighed around 150 pounds and forcing 30–40 pounds of corn
mash into their bodies over a 3–4–week period. This would cause a human's liver to expand,
degenerate, and stop functioning properly," (Munchies). He explains further that birds begin to
experience "diarrhea, seizures, loss of balance, and vomiting, like a human that

Argument Against Animal Rights
Animal Rights
When it comes to the topic of animal testing most of us will readily agree that it is a debatable topic.
Where this agreement usually ends, however, is on the question of should medical treatments be
developed through the use of testing on animals. Whereas some are convinced that treatments are
effective and successfully developed, others maintain that animals are different from human beings
such as our genetic traits. My own view is animal testing has helped improve humans health and
also has given great advances to science. Many people assume that when it comes to testing
animals, they believe they are being neglected, abused, and focused medical drugs. According to the
journal Nature Genetics, "To ensure we are having the best results possible we need the animals to
be healthy in every way...show more content...
If they can even cure a human being just by testing on an animal when both chromosomes and
other variety of genes are very different. "Genomic knowledge has made it so that animal research
can be much more specifically targeted and accurate when representing a human, thus correctly
predicting a how a human will react." (Cook). While it is true that we may not have the same
genetics as an animal, it necessarily to follow that the animals are great substitutes for us humans. In
conclusion, animal testing has improved in many advances to science. And also has been proven
that we can not have a stress animal to do research on or the results wont be reliable. "Research
animals are cared for by veterinarians, husbandry specialists, and animal health technicians to ensure
their well–being and more accurate findings." Even scientist know that the best results do come
from a well and healthy animal by pervading all the necessary care that each animal not only needs
but is for the lifespan and health of a human

The Issue Of Animal Rights Essay
Animals have the right to equal consideration in regards to their being used for human needs as
most people use animals for their own needs on a daily basis even if only indirectly whether to
entertain us, or to attain the product we are using, or on our dinner plate. The controversy of the
treatment of animals range from some activists and philosophers that are outspoken against
animals being used by humans in any way for our own personal needs, while others are candid in
their belief that animals are here solely for meeting our needs and have no rights at all. Although
everyone is able to tailor their actions to fit their moral, ethical and individual beliefs, and many
different categories of unique diets have come about from the freedom of defining personal
standards it is a controversial topic. With vegetarian and vegan diets', becoming more and more
common deciding what is morally justifiable in respects to the treatment of animals is an essential
issue for everyone. The dispute of animal rights is essentially focused on what rights animals
deserve to have and how they should be treated in regards to being experimented on, for humans'
entertainment, and their being used as livestock. A controversial issue in the debate of animal rights
is the health of the people that do not consume animals or animal products and those that do. A large
area of the debate is centered around the fact that is widely believed that meat from animals is
necessary for a healthy and

Sky Her
Mrs. Framke
E.L.A.
14 March, 2017
Animal rights
I believe that animals should be treated just as well as humans. "When it comes to feelings like
pain, hunger, and thirst, "A rat is a pig is a dog is a boy," says Ingrid Newkirk. Animal rights are
rights believed to belong to animals to live free from use in medical research, hunting, and other
services to humans. Because animals have feelings and are much like humans, they deserve to have
rights just like people do.
I believe that animals deserve better treatment than they get now because they have human emotions
and feel the same suffering and pain too. As breathing creatures are able to feel pain and torture just
as human beings do, animals deserve quality treatment and more appreciation...show more content...
I do not agree that animals shouldn't be hunted though. We need that meat to live.Animal cruelty is
defined as inflicting suffering or harm upon animals for a reason other than self defence. There is
a large range of things that can be considered animal cruelty. Such as horace racing, dog fighting,
and circuses because animals are suffering threw it all for human entertainment. Other people say
As long as they're doing it humanly there is nothing wrong with it. I agree that as long as they're
doing everything while taking care of the animals correctly and the animals are being treated well
that it is not animal cruelty but in most cases where they are not treated well the animals are in
constant suffering so in a way yes it is animal cruelty. Although humans think testing on animals is
good for the human race because it has made medical breakthroughs, the animals are treated cruelly
and inhumane and it is not fair to the animals. "Human beings have no right to use animals as if
they were disposable objects, even if it

Argumentative Essay On Animal Rights
2015
Animal rights
Introduction
In ancient years, philosophers had a lot to say about how humans treat animals. However, experts in
social sciences have taken part in issues concerning humans and other animals. Every year,
thousands of animals are in a tormented, and then died during the animal experiments. Another fact
is from Vivisection Information Network, there is a rough estimate from the European Union that
10.5 million vertebrate animals were used in animal experiments, which is 28,800 per day or one
every three seconds. Around 18.5 million animals were used in the USA per year (Updated, 2013).
And also the evidence in the emerging field of Human–Animal study, (HAS), shows that animal
protection is not taken seriously. A review of Marxist realism, feminism, ecofeminism, social
constructionist theorists and approaches that shows the human–animal study is highly concerned.
Animal protection movement involves animal welfare, animal liberation, and animal rights. Our
focus on this argument will be on animal rights....show more content...
This is incorrect because animals have feelings, and some have a measure of speech. In addition,
some take care of their young ones and protect each other. This proves that similar to humans animals
also have feelings, desires and emotions, and, therefore, deserve to have rights. According to Rene
Descartes, every being that has a mind deserves to be treated fairly because it shows that the animal
has the ability to think rationally. Charles Darwin, who came up with the theory of existence through
evolution, came up with a hypothesis that shows a correlation between humans and nonhuman
beings. In his hypothesis, he concluded that animals have emotions and feelings that have evolved
the same way as humans' emotions (Francione & Garner,

What Are The Arguments Against Animal Rights
Animal Rights Argument There was once a time in our world where our animals were treated like
gold to us humans because they provided our food we eat. However, according to the ASPCA,
"99% of farm animals nationwide live in factory farms", where they only focus on making money
and keeping their business strong. Factories do not care about what happens to the animals, but I
believe that we should. Animals are not just pets or food, they are living creatures on the planet
just like us humans. If we are raising all these animals to be slaughtered for our food, then why
not treat them fairly? Their lives are being taking to keep us alive and healthy, the least thing we
can do is treat the animals good so they can die in peace. I believe that animal cruelty should be a
very big issue in the U.S and we should find a way to make sure animals are treated nicely. Animals
today are treated so inhumane that most people cannot even bear to witness the abuse they get.
People are caring more less for all the animals because they believe that animals do not...show more
content...
However, the people who do these things only get a misdemeanor and a fine, maybe even some
jail time. This issue is not very concerning to some people, but it should be a very big issue. For
example, an event in Georgia involved a dog sitting in a hot vehicle with all the windows rolled
up. A veteran man saw the dog in there and broke out one of the windows to save the dog,
however, it is illegal to break a car window to save a dog in the state of Georgia. Therefore, the
man was arrested and the lady who left the dog in the car was only given a fine. This is insane!
Animal cruelty needs to be heard about worldwide and people need to realize that they are hurting a
creature who can have or feel emotions just as we can! So if we would not hurt another human, why
would you hurt a defenseless

Argument Against Animal Rights
Animal Rights
Ever since man has ever ruled the Earth, history have shown we dispose everything to further our
own species and their cause. Because of this, most of everything that we dispose are at the expense
of animals and we as humans tend to have such a drive to rule out the animals that are viewed as
worthless creatures. Which leads to bad behavior in a way that the society thinks about animal rights.
Animal Rights should be focused more on rather than using them as a tool. However, researchers
have come up with ways and technologies to develop a new face of animal rights.
With the human race being so opinionated, it is quite impossible to solve a solution as a whole for
animal rights. So much has happened and it made a drastic turn in the world that people started to
develop a movement to protect human rights. With that being said, groups like PETA (People for the
Ethical Treatment of Animals), founded in the 1980s were formed to create a focal point on the
areas that include mainly of animal suffrage. PETA concentrates on the areas that harm the animals
such as places like, factory farms, clothing industries, laboratories, and the entertainment industry.
The PETA has come to the fact that it is the largest animal rights organization on Earth. Formed in
the 1980's PETA is the largest...show more content...
However, Animal Rights is very important in today's world because no animal of any kind should
ever have to suffer the pain of abusement nor do they deserve it either. The organization, PETA
(People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals), was created to prevent from animal cruelty from
happening. Also, they care to continue the movement to take a stand in animal cruelty all over the
world. PETA is the reason so many animals are saved and treated with protection and care. We as a
society should appreciate many groups and organizations that were formed to stop animal

What Are The Arguments Against Animal Rights
Animals are held against their will and forced to work in inhumane areas. Animals have families to
take care of just like humans do. Violations towards animals have been happening and they end up
extremely hurt or dead, in the end nothing happens to prevent more of this to happen again. Workers
for the labs do not care for the animals and leave them in unstable places. Other animals such as
monkeys are kept in small facilities that can only fit a small amount. The University of Louisiana
caused 3 monkeys to die when they were stuck in a chute.
The opposition believe that animals have rights in the same way that humans have rights. Since
animals do not follow the law and have no way to think and act. Opponents believe that human
interest should

Animal Rights Against Animals
magine eating a delicious piece of bacon with the fat juice dripping off while biting into the bacon,
it crunches. Now imagine the pig that the bacon came from. An innocent creature now has been
shocked with electric prods, had its throat cut, and has bled out to death. Pigs are not the only
creatures to suffer such a despicable death. Animals like sheep, cows, chickens, and goats are
slaughtered for their meat. The animals are all butchered in a place called a slaughterhouse.
Slaughterhouses are horrible places where humans believe they have the right to treat animals any
way they want as long as they get the meat they need. People who eat meat need to understand what
happens to an animal before it winds up on a plate.Animals can not defend themselves against
humans. Therefore, someone else must defend the animals. Slaughterhouses must be stopped.
Slaughterhouses are the cheapest ways for humans to get meat. Rather than paying large sums of
money to put the animals down humanely, they are just murdered. Animals are separated in
slaughterhouses from their families after being with them for weeks. Imagine one never getting to
know his mother, then being ripped away from their child, while trying to manage to
survive.Animals should have rights just like humans do. Animals' hearts beat just like any
human's.If animals have to be raised and die, they should not suffer. Most animal's natural instincts
are to protect their children, and that is ripped away from them with their

Arguments For And Against Eating Animals
Moral Arguments For and Against Eating Animals All throughout the world there are arguments
about whether it is morally right or morally wrong to eat animals. Throughout this class we have
read many articles and talked about the morality behind this argument in lectures. We see people who
are strongly for both sides and throughout this paper I will mention why individuals believe what
they believe is the right thing to do in this argument.
In the textbook there is an article called, "The Case for Animal Rights" written by Tom Regan. In
this article Regan elaborates on how animals have rights and should be treated appropriately.
Regan is a part of the animal rights movement and says in order to solve this problem we need to
reach three goals which are, total abolition of the use of animals in science, total dissolution of
commercial animal agriculture, and total elimination of commercial and sport hunting and trapping
(Regan 360). What's wrong with how animals are treated isn't the pain, suffering, and deprivation it
is that we view animals as our resources. Regan says, "Once we accept this view of animals– as our
resources– the rest is a predictable as it is regrettable." (Regan 361) Regan is saying once we get
that idea and mind set in our heads we are automatically not going to care about their pain, suffering,
or death since they are on earth to benefit us. In the article it talks about how some individuals
believe it is alright if the animals are treated more humanely but Regan believes otherwise I thinks
we need a total dissolution of commercial animal culture. In the article Regan talks about
contractarianism. This is when morality consists of a set of rules that individuals agree to abide by
and if you do so you sign a contract. Regan goes on to explain this theory in depth. He says, "Those
who understand and accept the terms of the contract are covered directly; they have rights created
and recognized by, and protected in; the contract." (Regan 363) Does this mean that those you can't
read or understand the contract aren't protected? Not exactly. Regan goes on to mention that if you
can't understand the morality and cannot sign the contract you are still protected by the ones who
love you and can

Argument for Animal Rights Essay
Argument for Animal Rights
The argument for animal rights assumes that animals posses their own lives and deserve to be
assigned rights in order to protect their wellbeing. This view insists that animals are not merely
goods utilised only to benefit mankind and they should be allowed to choose how they want to live
their lives, free from the constraints of man. But if animals are given absolute rights, then surely
they shouldn't be allowed to kill each other, as this would be a violation of these rights. Should
murderous animals be administered prison sentences or even...capital punishment?
One method of preventing animals killing each other would be to provide animals with a vegetarian
This is ironic because we are moral beings and can think about our actions, yet we kill and mistreat
animals as they are lesser beings and can't think about their actions. However, before we can answer
the question of whether or not animals have the right to kill each other, we must ask whether or not
they even have rights.
It can be argued that, as greater beings, we should take responsibility for the wellbeing of those
species that are less developed than us, rather than using our power to manipulate and exploit them.
According to Rawls's contractualism, animals are not rational agents and humans are. This implies
that, as humans are the ones who have created the concept of rights, they should only apply to
humans. However, Peter Carruthers extends this theory so that it defends the rights of animals. He
suggests that a rational agent could enter into a contract for an animal, representing their interests in
'the formulation of the basic contract'. There are also some human beings who cannot speak for
themselves or question their actions, for example, fetuses, infants, the comatose, the senile and the
severely retarded. These people are still assigned rights despite the fact that they are not moral
agents. They may make the same simple instinctive decisions as animals, yet are given rights based
upon their species. It can be

Animal Rights Controversy
For the fifth time that day, Mrs. Jacobs walks past the Miller's window where she stares at their
family pug. All of her effort to not open the door is confined in hatred, this animal that doesn't
deserve to be cooped up all day, being taken advantage of. All animals should be loved, animal
critics argue, but it is not necessary for animals to be given rights because of their lack of
communication with humans. The argument of animal rights has exploded in the last decade, creating
organizations like P.E.T.A. (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals) and A.L.F. (Animal
Liberation Front) both of which are trying to enforce the government to create laws for animal
rights. Animal rights have been a topic of discussion as early as Ancient Rome,...show more content...
What will happen to all the advancements in medical research, and will animals be put in prison or
brought to jury? The American College of Surgeons has announced that animal research for
education and scientific studies will not be able to be replaced, because of the life changing medical
advances that animals have accomplished for humans. Cancer and HIV medications have depended
on animals to test the effectiveness of the drug and the safety. "In 2005, AIDS patient advocates
campaigned against PETA, criticizing the group for standing in the way of research that requires the
use of animals for toxicity testing." (Lee and Cushman 4). Animal critics believe that animals should
not have rights because of the huge improvement they had made on medicines with animal testing.
Animal testing is not supposed to harm animals its suppose to find ways to help fight diseases for
humans like: Insulin injections for diabetes patients, chemotherapy for cancer patients, stem cell
transplants, vaccines for smallpox, polio, and yellow fever (Rich). If animals were given rights,
researches with animals would have to be discontinued because it would be against the law.
Scientists say it would be devastating and would be a hold to scientific advancement in the medical
field (Rich). If animals were given rights, we can't understand them and they can't comprehend
morality. Animal rights supporters argue that everything in life should have the same equal value.
Some with higher thinking, such as forming beliefs about the world and to respond emotionally and
animals that can do this can be granted natural human rights. This has raised a question to the logical
end, "Consider, for instance, the relative value of a highly functioning great ape, capable of complex
communications and sophisticated tool use, and that of a human child with severe cognitive
disabilities, who will never learn language

Carl Cohen's Argument Against Animal Rights
On the other hand, Carl Cohen, who is a philosopher who against animal rights, concludes that if
humans do not use animals to help them for living, they will suffer more. If humans want to against
human's right, they have to be ready to not consuming whether intentionally or unintentionally
animals. In medical field, it will be impossible to find cures for human if the scientists do not test it
to other beings, in this case, animals. According to Cohen, humans use animal for their experiment
because animals are not able to have moral decisions. Also, animals are not capable of exercising or
responding to moral claims, and they cannot have any rights. Whereas human, on the other hand, are
capable of moral claims, and they are eligible to have

Animal Rights And Human Rights
Animal Rights "Nearly as many, 68 percent, were concerned or very concerned about the well–being
of animals used in 'sports' or contests as well as animals in laboratories (67 percent) (Kretzer, 1)."
Many people question whether an animal is capable of thought and emotions. Others feel as though
animals are the equivalent of humans and should be treated as such. Since the 1800's, animal rights
has been a topic that has several different sides including two extremes. If animals can react to
their environment, emote, and are aware of things done to or with them, then they should have
similar rights to humans. Some of us have animals as pets, for competitions, for our jobs, and
some to survive. Much like tasking asked of humans in day to day life. Those of us who have
pets, see them as a part of the family, making us believe they are no different than a child we gave
birth to. When we bring home our new born children, we love them, nurture them, and teach them as
they grow to be adults. What happens to most families when they bring home their sweet little
puppies, kittens, or other baby animal of our choosing? I would imagine that the goal is to raise
them to adapt to their new family. This is no different than that of a small child. Looking at a
behavioral stand point and comparing household pets to human beings, the reactions are very
similar. When children are physically and mentally abused on a regular basis, the smallest act may
have a similar reaction as that of a

"Never be afraid to do what's right, especially if the well–being of a person or ANIMAL is at stake."
– Martin Luther King Jr. The animal welfare act is to regulate the use and care of animals in a
laboratory setting. Animal rights is the right believed to belong to animals to live free from use in
medical research, hunting, and other services to humans. The first animal protection group was
called ASPCA or the Animal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals founded by Henry
Bergh in April 1866 ("11 facts about animal"). Animals shouldn't be used in medical research because
the animals aren't protected by the Animal Welfare Act, and there are alternatives for testing products
that don't involve animals, despite the fact that some of these tests led to medical breakthroughs
("should animals be used"). The first argument for there to not be animal testing anymore is animals
aren't protected by the animal welfare act ("should animals be used"). Animals are tested in labs to
test human diseases, products, and breeding purposes (Ben Williamson 2). Over 115 million animals
a year die from being tested in labs. When testing animals for skin sensitivity products they put the
If you've ever taken antibiotics, had a vaccine, a blood transfusion, dialysis, an organ transplant, or a
joint replacement, you have benefitted from animal testing and research ("Humane society"). It's
true there are medical breakthroughs however, if you use an alternative to testing animals such as
genetic testing methods than animals wouldn't have to suffer ("11 facts about animal"). Over 115
million animals a year die from being tested in lab experiments. During animal experimentation mice
get tumors the size of their own bodies and kittens are purposely blinded to test makeup ("11 facts
about animal"). Testing animals are not 100% accurate for humans because their bodies are different
than humans (Woodward kay

Animal Rights: An Example Of Socialism
Animal rights is an example of socialism. Socialism is the reason some animals are alive today.
Animal rights is an example of socialism because animals have the same rights humans have.
Harming animals is seen mainly in dog commercials now. The commercials sometimes show how
people treat most animals at home. People should not stand around a let other people harm animals
they should speak up. Most people attitude towards animals is sometimes rude and not respectful.
People treat them like they are not as important as they are. Animal rights is an example of socialism
because it shows you that you do not have to be a human to have rights. Rights for animals could not
be an example of capitalism because that means nobody would have cared about

Argumentative Essay On Animal Rights
Animal rights has always been conversional subject, what rights do they have, what type of treatment
they may endure, and what is wildlife versus what are pets. Society as it a whole as always had used
animals as form entertainment for example like zoos, circuses, aquariums, rodeos, animal fighting
and hunting. Though these types of entertainments project as innocent forms of fun for all ages
when it's enslavement for the animals. These animals are taken from their homes to be forced
behind cages, glass and concert walls to perform for the paying customer. The animals see millions
of human faces pressed against these walls staring in hoping to see them do tricks or just move in
general. These animals are also forced to perform and train for hours on in just to be a meal ticket
for the right buyer.
The advertisement above illustrates how animals are used like puppets for entertainment. When you
think of puppets, you think of a puppet master pulling the strings, to make the puppet dance, sing
and entertain you. Now just picture a wild animal having invisible strings attached to them with a
puppet master giving orders. Instead of strings they use actual force and punishment to get what they
want. While in the picture it states, "The show must go on", when you hear this phrase you know
meaning that regardless of what happens, whatever show has been planned still must be performed
for the paying guests, the same goes for animals too. Which suggest no matter how much force, pain

Against Animal Rights Essay

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Buy An Essay Online Syracuse

More from Buy An Essay Online Syracuse (10)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Against Animal Rights Essay