SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 18
Fairfax City iTree Streets Preliminary
Project
By Ashley Anne Strobridge
Environmental & Sustainability Studies Major, Geography/Women’s Studies Minors
George Mason University
Advisor: Dr. Matt Rice – GMU Geography and Geoinformational Sciences
Consultants: Stefanie Kupka – City of Fairfax Office of Sustainability & CJ Crabtree – City of Fairfax
Arborist
Introduction
Purpose of Project:
To generate a Cost-Benefit Analysis of Fairfax City Trees using:
 iTree Streets, a peer-reviewed software suite designed by the USDA
Forest Service for use in urban and community forestry analysis and
benefits assessment
 2010 Fairfax City Trees Survey
Steps:
1) Formatted over 2500 entries with proper tree species names and
measurements in MS Excel for use with program
2) Formatted list for use with MS Access, which is the program that
iTree recognizes
3) Retrieved required Fairfax City data inputs to create iTree Streets
project (only partially completed)
4) Created iTree Streets project
5) Ran and Analyzed iTree Streets reports
6) Explored options for further tree survey data gathering
Street Tree Benefits:
 Trees are a valuable asset to Fairfax City.
They naturally:
 Reduce stormwater runoff
 Lower summer air temperatures
 Reduce air pollution
 Reduce heating and cooling costs
 Reduce atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2)
 Enhance property values
 Provide wildlife habitat
 Improve health and wellbeing
 Improve learning and concentration
 Provide aesthetic benefits
Picture Credit: Ashley Anne Strobridge
75%
$142,489
9%
$16,721
8%
$16,112
5%
$8,845
2%
$2,858
1%
$2,487
Aesthtic/Property Value
Increase
StormWater Runoff
Reduction
Stored CO2
Energy Savings
Air Quality Improvement
CO2 Sequestered &
Avoided
$189,512
Total Annual
Savings Benefits
Annual Savings Benefits from City Trees
2,686 City Trees
Top 5 Beneficial Tree Species in
Total $ Saved per Tree
$0.00
$100.00
$200.00
$300.00
$400.00
$500.00
$600.00
$700.00
White
Oak
Oak Silver
Maple
Black
Poplar
White
Poplar
$603.01
$504.30 $502.82
$433.60
$377.77
*
*Silver Maple is Best of all species in analysis for Energy, Air Quality, and Stormwater savings
**White Poplar has worst Air Quality rating of all species in analysis, actually subtracting
value (-$9.74 per tree), but does very well in other categories
**
Focus on Stormwater: Trees Improve Water
Quality and Reduce Volume and Speed of
Stormwater Run-off
Interception of Stormwater:
• Trees intercept rainfall with their
leaves and branches, creating
slow stemflow of water into the
ground
• Roots take up soil moisture,
which creates evapotranspiration
of water back into atmosphere
Other Functional Benefits:
• Roots of trees maintain soil
stability, reducing erosion
• Roots and soil together filter out
pollutants that would otherwise
end up in the watershed. This
protects the Chesapeake Bay
from further pollution and
nutrient overload
Trees Intercept Rainfall, Reducing
Stormwater Management Costs & Helping
the Ecosystem
Could Money Grow on Trees?
 Trees intercept rainfall that
would otherwise become
stormwater that is costly to
handle via man-made
structures.
 In 2012, Fairfax City spent
$390,000 on stormwater
infrastructure improvements.
 How much of that cost could
have been avoided by planting
more trees? Especially the right
kind of trees…
Picture Credit: Retrieved from 2012 City of
Fairfax Budget Document
 Trees in Fairfax City intercept 1,634,982 gallons of
storm water per year for an annual savings of $16,721
 Top 3 $/tree species for stormwater interception
 Silver Maple = $109 per tree
 White Oak = $97 per tree
 Black Poplar = $71 per tree
 Top 3 overall $ saving trees by volume of stormwater
intercepted and by total money saved
 Littleleaf Linden = $3,388 (~$8 per tree)
 Oct. Glory Red Maple = $1,935 ($4.50 per tree)
 Japanese Pagoda Tree = $1,646 (~$14.50 per tree)
Snap-Shot of The City of Fairfax’s City Tree
Stormwater Interception
But Which Trees Does Fairfax City Have the MOST of?
• Top 3 $ saved per tree species don’t even make chart %
listing (smaller than 3.5% of population)
• Silver Maple = $109 per tree (7 trees total)
• White Oak = $97 per tree (1 tree total)
• Black Poplar = $71 per tree (21 trees total)
Only very few of the most beneficial trees!
% of Total Population by Species
1) Littleleaf Linden
 1st in pop size w/
433 trees
 342,225 gallons
intercepted
 $3,338 saved
2) Oct. Glory Red Maple
 2nd in pop size w/
430 trees
 195,435 gallons
 $1,935 saved
3) Jap. Pagoda
 7th in pop size w/
113 trees
 166,259 gallons
 $1,646 saved
Top 3 by-volume savers
Total Tree Pop. = 2,686
Increasing the Stormwater Benefit Values by
Increasing Amount of Most Productive Trees
…But what if the City had the same number of White Oaks
that it has of Littleleaf Lindens?
 If we take the total $ saved by the largest population of trees
(Littleleaf Linden), and divide it by the $ per tree saved, we get
the number of L. Linden trees (figure not shown in iTree data).
So…
$3,388/$8 = 433 Littleleaf Linden trees
 Then if we multiply the number of L. Lindens by the $ saved per
tree of the White Oak, we get the amount that Fairfax City would
save if there were as many White Oaks as there are currently
Littleleaf Lindens:
433 x $97 = $42,001 potential stormwater savings!
White Oak: Stormwater Super-Tree
So if Fairfax City planted more White Oaks, it would save close to
$42,001 annually from W. Oak stormwater interception ALONE over
the total $16,721 from ALL SPECIES stormwater interception.
That’s 2½ X the TOTAL $ in just ONE SPEICIES!
$0
$5,000
$10,000
$15,000
$20,000
$25,000
$30,000
$35,000
$40,000
$45,000
Total Stormwater
Benefits of All Trees Current Littleleaf
Linden S.W. Benefits Potential White Oak
S.W. Benefits
$16,213
$3,388
$42,001
Imagine reducing that $390,000 2012 stormwater cost by $42,000! Not bad!
The White Oak is an Overall Super-Saver
 Currently there is only 1 White Oak in Fairfax City,
but that lone tree already accounts for a 9,848
gallons of stormwater intercepted annually.
 The White Oak is the leader in the category of
Aesthetic and Property values, topping the list at a
whopping $473 benefit per tree
 The White Oak is also ranked 3rd of all 61 species
in the survey for Energy savings, at ~$23 savings
per tree annually
 As the Number One Beneficial Tree at a savings of
$603 per tree, it is clear that planting more White
Oaks would be financially beneficial for the City of
Fairfax
Potential savings benefit if there were as many
White Oaks as there are currently L. Lindens:
$0
$50,000
$100,000
$150,000
$200,000
$250,000
$300,000
Current Overall
City Tree Benefits
Current Littleleaf
Linden Benefits
Current White Oak
Benefits
Potential White
Oak Benefits
$189,512
$41,568
$603
$261,099
The savings potential from ONE species, White Oak, outstrips
the TOTAL annual benefit of all trees by nearly 50%, and is
over 6X the current annual benefit from the most beneficial-
due-to-volume tree species, Littleleaf Linden
Feasibility of Planting More White Oaks
 According to Merrifield Garden Center, White Oaks do well in
this region
 Merrifield G.C. sells W. Oaks for $195 per 15 gallon tree
 With a 25-30% discount for Cities who bulk order via contractor,
plus a 65% planting fee added to the $195 cost per tree
 Making the final total cost per tree = $224
 With White Oaks benefiting the City $603 per tree, the cost of
purchasing & planting the W. Oaks is offset, and there is still
$379 benefit leftover per tree after initial costs are
subtracted.
 Littleleaf Lindens cost $325 per 2” trunk tree at Merrifield
G.C., and are not available at the 15 gallon price, but still
require the additional 65% planting fee.
 With the 65% fee, minus 30% off, L. Lindens cost $376 per tree.
And w/ L. Lindens only benefiting the City $96 per tree, that’s
leaves no benefits leftover, and actually ends up costing the city
$280 per tree planted
Take Away Points
 Currently, Fairfax City Trees are benefiting the City a
total of $189,512 annually by:
 Increasing Property Values = $142,489
 Intercepting Damaging Stormwater = $16,721
 Storing & Sequestering CO2 = $18,599
 Providing Energy Savings = $8,845
 Improving Air Quality = $2,858
 Those Total Annual Benefits could be increased by 50%,
with as much as $261,099 added, if more White Oaks
were planted
 It is theoretically feasible to plant more White Oaks in
Fairfax City
 These totals are subject to change due to potential
inaccuracies in input data (see next slides)
Automatic Inputs for iTree Analysis
 Electricity ($/kwh): $0.0759
 Natural Gas ($/Therm): $1.046
 CO2 ($/lb): $0.0075
 PM10 ($/lb): $2.49
 NO2 ($/lb): $6.55
 SO2 ($/lb): $1.97
 VOC ($/lb): $6.26
 Stormwater Interception ($/gal): $0.0099
 Average Home Resale Value: $600,000*
*Average Home Resale Value was originally ~$119,000. New value was calculated
by consulting the following website:
http://www.homefinders.com/county_maps/virginia/fairfax-city.php
Took average price of single family homes in sampling of zip codes in Fairfax Co.
($698,319) and weighed it against the mid-lower range average price of a home in a
sampling of popular Fairfax City communities (between $474,990 and $525,000) to
come up with Average Home Resale Value. (Wanted to take into account that
website might not list lower-end communities under “Popular Communities,” so
chose mid-low value).
More to be done….
To get the most accurate cost-benefit analysis
using iTree:
 Need the additional City data inputs of:
 Accurate Benefit Prices (list on previous slide)
 Annual Costs of City Tree Maintenance (list available)
(Current analysis of benefits is most likely skewed low due to low estimations of
energy/stormwater management benefit prices, & lack of tree management costs)
 Need updated tree data gathered via in-field tree
survey:
 Gather new data on tree diameter, location
 Include tree condition
 Enlist help from Fairfax City High School AP Enviro Sci Students
 Notes on iTree Streets
 iTree Streets is iPad/tablet/smartphone compatible
 Capability for GIS component

More Related Content

Similar to final-final-A.Strobridge-Fairfax City iTree Streets Preliminary Project

The Costs of Maintaining (& Not Maintaining) Trees
The Costs of Maintaining (& Not Maintaining) TreesThe Costs of Maintaining (& Not Maintaining) Trees
The Costs of Maintaining (& Not Maintaining) TreesSusan Stafford
 
A Healthy And Green Guelph
A Healthy And Green GuelphA Healthy And Green Guelph
A Healthy And Green Guelphjanhall
 
Who owns the rain? Building a collection system.
Who owns the rain?  Building a collection system.Who owns the rain?  Building a collection system.
Who owns the rain? Building a collection system.Lonny Grafman
 
Nov 18 Planet
Nov 18 PlanetNov 18 Planet
Nov 18 Planetdweddle
 
Mac Watershed Rain Gardens Rain Barrels
Mac Watershed Rain Gardens Rain BarrelsMac Watershed Rain Gardens Rain Barrels
Mac Watershed Rain Gardens Rain BarrelsKen Freestone
 
Sustainable Guelph Oct 1 2009
Sustainable Guelph Oct 1 2009Sustainable Guelph Oct 1 2009
Sustainable Guelph Oct 1 2009janhall
 
AH City Council Meeting 10.26.15 - Item #7 Tree Mitigation Amendments
AH City Council Meeting 10.26.15 - Item #7 Tree Mitigation AmendmentsAH City Council Meeting 10.26.15 - Item #7 Tree Mitigation Amendments
AH City Council Meeting 10.26.15 - Item #7 Tree Mitigation AmendmentsMarian Vargas Mendoza
 
Trees In City Slide Show
Trees In City Slide ShowTrees In City Slide Show
Trees In City Slide Showkatiet1982
 
Tree biology, benefits, and the urban
Tree biology, benefits, and the urban Tree biology, benefits, and the urban
Tree biology, benefits, and the urban maurban
 
Natural capital in British Columbia's lower mainland
Natural capital in British Columbia's lower mainlandNatural capital in British Columbia's lower mainland
Natural capital in British Columbia's lower mainlandDavidSuzukiFDN
 
Using i-Tree to Demonstrate Value
Using i-Tree to Demonstrate ValueUsing i-Tree to Demonstrate Value
Using i-Tree to Demonstrate ValueJosh Behounek
 
san_antonio_2009
san_antonio_2009san_antonio_2009
san_antonio_2009Kenneth Kay
 
“Trees and People: Assessing Urban Greening Organizations’ Neighborhood Tree ...
“Trees and People: Assessing Urban Greening Organizations’ Neighborhood Tree ...“Trees and People: Assessing Urban Greening Organizations’ Neighborhood Tree ...
“Trees and People: Assessing Urban Greening Organizations’ Neighborhood Tree ...Rails-To-Trails Conservancy
 
Changing Our Communities: The Possibilities of Going Green
Changing Our Communities: The Possibilities of Going GreenChanging Our Communities: The Possibilities of Going Green
Changing Our Communities: The Possibilities of Going GreenButrflye
 
Final Presentation
Final PresentationFinal Presentation
Final Presentationscottthorpe
 
Emerald Ash Borer Integrated Project Presentation
Emerald Ash Borer Integrated Project PresentationEmerald Ash Borer Integrated Project Presentation
Emerald Ash Borer Integrated Project PresentationJeff Quinlan
 

Similar to final-final-A.Strobridge-Fairfax City iTree Streets Preliminary Project (20)

Municipal Forest Resource Analysis ~ City of Albuquerque, New Mexico
Municipal Forest Resource Analysis ~ City of Albuquerque, New MexicoMunicipal Forest Resource Analysis ~ City of Albuquerque, New Mexico
Municipal Forest Resource Analysis ~ City of Albuquerque, New Mexico
 
bellevue_2008
bellevue_2008bellevue_2008
bellevue_2008
 
The Costs of Maintaining (& Not Maintaining) Trees
The Costs of Maintaining (& Not Maintaining) TreesThe Costs of Maintaining (& Not Maintaining) Trees
The Costs of Maintaining (& Not Maintaining) Trees
 
A Healthy And Green Guelph
A Healthy And Green GuelphA Healthy And Green Guelph
A Healthy And Green Guelph
 
Who owns the rain? Building a collection system.
Who owns the rain?  Building a collection system.Who owns the rain?  Building a collection system.
Who owns the rain? Building a collection system.
 
Nov 18 Planet
Nov 18 PlanetNov 18 Planet
Nov 18 Planet
 
Mac Watershed Rain Gardens Rain Barrels
Mac Watershed Rain Gardens Rain BarrelsMac Watershed Rain Gardens Rain Barrels
Mac Watershed Rain Gardens Rain Barrels
 
Sustainable Guelph Oct 1 2009
Sustainable Guelph Oct 1 2009Sustainable Guelph Oct 1 2009
Sustainable Guelph Oct 1 2009
 
AH City Council Meeting 10.26.15 - Item #7 Tree Mitigation Amendments
AH City Council Meeting 10.26.15 - Item #7 Tree Mitigation AmendmentsAH City Council Meeting 10.26.15 - Item #7 Tree Mitigation Amendments
AH City Council Meeting 10.26.15 - Item #7 Tree Mitigation Amendments
 
Value, Benefits, and Costs of Urban Trees
Value, Benefits, and Costs of Urban TreesValue, Benefits, and Costs of Urban Trees
Value, Benefits, and Costs of Urban Trees
 
Trees In City Slide Show
Trees In City Slide ShowTrees In City Slide Show
Trees In City Slide Show
 
Tree biology, benefits, and the urban
Tree biology, benefits, and the urban Tree biology, benefits, and the urban
Tree biology, benefits, and the urban
 
Natural capital in British Columbia's lower mainland
Natural capital in British Columbia's lower mainlandNatural capital in British Columbia's lower mainland
Natural capital in British Columbia's lower mainland
 
Using i-Tree to Demonstrate Value
Using i-Tree to Demonstrate ValueUsing i-Tree to Demonstrate Value
Using i-Tree to Demonstrate Value
 
san_antonio_2009
san_antonio_2009san_antonio_2009
san_antonio_2009
 
“Trees and People: Assessing Urban Greening Organizations’ Neighborhood Tree ...
“Trees and People: Assessing Urban Greening Organizations’ Neighborhood Tree ...“Trees and People: Assessing Urban Greening Organizations’ Neighborhood Tree ...
“Trees and People: Assessing Urban Greening Organizations’ Neighborhood Tree ...
 
Changing Our Communities: The Possibilities of Going Green
Changing Our Communities: The Possibilities of Going GreenChanging Our Communities: The Possibilities of Going Green
Changing Our Communities: The Possibilities of Going Green
 
Final Presentation
Final PresentationFinal Presentation
Final Presentation
 
Emerald Ash Borer Integrated Project Presentation
Emerald Ash Borer Integrated Project PresentationEmerald Ash Borer Integrated Project Presentation
Emerald Ash Borer Integrated Project Presentation
 
Trees
TreesTrees
Trees
 

More from Ashley Strobridge

September-guide_Sea-level-riseFINAL1
September-guide_Sea-level-riseFINAL1September-guide_Sea-level-riseFINAL1
September-guide_Sea-level-riseFINAL1Ashley Strobridge
 
Green Club-Recycling Blitz-scanned
Green Club-Recycling Blitz-scannedGreen Club-Recycling Blitz-scanned
Green Club-Recycling Blitz-scannedAshley Strobridge
 
NOVAAlexThrowingAwayRecycling
NOVAAlexThrowingAwayRecyclingNOVAAlexThrowingAwayRecycling
NOVAAlexThrowingAwayRecyclingAshley Strobridge
 
July_August_Guide_FINAL-8.5.14
July_August_Guide_FINAL-8.5.14July_August_Guide_FINAL-8.5.14
July_August_Guide_FINAL-8.5.14Ashley Strobridge
 
Vegetarianism Power Point Project
Vegetarianism Power Point ProjectVegetarianism Power Point Project
Vegetarianism Power Point ProjectAshley Strobridge
 
A.Strobridge-Women and Mathematics-Final-withwc
A.Strobridge-Women and Mathematics-Final-withwcA.Strobridge-Women and Mathematics-Final-withwc
A.Strobridge-Women and Mathematics-Final-withwcAshley Strobridge
 
Final-WMST Women in Mathematics Presentation
Final-WMST Women in Mathematics PresentationFinal-WMST Women in Mathematics Presentation
Final-WMST Women in Mathematics PresentationAshley Strobridge
 
Ashley.Strobridge.WomenFilmmakersResearchPaper
Ashley.Strobridge.WomenFilmmakersResearchPaperAshley.Strobridge.WomenFilmmakersResearchPaper
Ashley.Strobridge.WomenFilmmakersResearchPaperAshley Strobridge
 
A.Strobridge-GGS Presentation
A.Strobridge-GGS PresentationA.Strobridge-GGS Presentation
A.Strobridge-GGS PresentationAshley Strobridge
 
FactSheet_8-2014_Heat-online-final
FactSheet_8-2014_Heat-online-finalFactSheet_8-2014_Heat-online-final
FactSheet_8-2014_Heat-online-finalAshley Strobridge
 

More from Ashley Strobridge (17)

September-guide_Sea-level-riseFINAL1
September-guide_Sea-level-riseFINAL1September-guide_Sea-level-riseFINAL1
September-guide_Sea-level-riseFINAL1
 
A.StrobridgeAssign5
A.StrobridgeAssign5A.StrobridgeAssign5
A.StrobridgeAssign5
 
A.Strobridge-Research.Paper
A.Strobridge-Research.PaperA.Strobridge-Research.Paper
A.Strobridge-Research.Paper
 
HALAA Final Memo-LEED
HALAA Final Memo-LEEDHALAA Final Memo-LEED
HALAA Final Memo-LEED
 
July_August_2014_Calander
July_August_2014_CalanderJuly_August_2014_Calander
July_August_2014_Calander
 
Green Club-Recycling Blitz-scanned
Green Club-Recycling Blitz-scannedGreen Club-Recycling Blitz-scanned
Green Club-Recycling Blitz-scanned
 
NOVAAlexThrowingAwayRecycling
NOVAAlexThrowingAwayRecyclingNOVAAlexThrowingAwayRecycling
NOVAAlexThrowingAwayRecycling
 
July_August_Guide_FINAL-8.5.14
July_August_Guide_FINAL-8.5.14July_August_Guide_FINAL-8.5.14
July_August_Guide_FINAL-8.5.14
 
A.Strobridge-SLRTermPaper
A.Strobridge-SLRTermPaperA.Strobridge-SLRTermPaper
A.Strobridge-SLRTermPaper
 
Vegetarianism Power Point Project
Vegetarianism Power Point ProjectVegetarianism Power Point Project
Vegetarianism Power Point Project
 
A.Strobridge-Women and Mathematics-Final-withwc
A.Strobridge-Women and Mathematics-Final-withwcA.Strobridge-Women and Mathematics-Final-withwc
A.Strobridge-Women and Mathematics-Final-withwc
 
Final-WMST Women in Mathematics Presentation
Final-WMST Women in Mathematics PresentationFinal-WMST Women in Mathematics Presentation
Final-WMST Women in Mathematics Presentation
 
Ashley.Strobridge.WomenFilmmakersResearchPaper
Ashley.Strobridge.WomenFilmmakersResearchPaperAshley.Strobridge.WomenFilmmakersResearchPaper
Ashley.Strobridge.WomenFilmmakersResearchPaper
 
AshleyStrobridgeLitReview
AshleyStrobridgeLitReviewAshleyStrobridgeLitReview
AshleyStrobridgeLitReview
 
EJ Essay
EJ EssayEJ Essay
EJ Essay
 
A.Strobridge-GGS Presentation
A.Strobridge-GGS PresentationA.Strobridge-GGS Presentation
A.Strobridge-GGS Presentation
 
FactSheet_8-2014_Heat-online-final
FactSheet_8-2014_Heat-online-finalFactSheet_8-2014_Heat-online-final
FactSheet_8-2014_Heat-online-final
 

final-final-A.Strobridge-Fairfax City iTree Streets Preliminary Project

  • 1. Fairfax City iTree Streets Preliminary Project By Ashley Anne Strobridge Environmental & Sustainability Studies Major, Geography/Women’s Studies Minors George Mason University Advisor: Dr. Matt Rice – GMU Geography and Geoinformational Sciences Consultants: Stefanie Kupka – City of Fairfax Office of Sustainability & CJ Crabtree – City of Fairfax Arborist
  • 2. Introduction Purpose of Project: To generate a Cost-Benefit Analysis of Fairfax City Trees using:  iTree Streets, a peer-reviewed software suite designed by the USDA Forest Service for use in urban and community forestry analysis and benefits assessment  2010 Fairfax City Trees Survey Steps: 1) Formatted over 2500 entries with proper tree species names and measurements in MS Excel for use with program 2) Formatted list for use with MS Access, which is the program that iTree recognizes 3) Retrieved required Fairfax City data inputs to create iTree Streets project (only partially completed) 4) Created iTree Streets project 5) Ran and Analyzed iTree Streets reports 6) Explored options for further tree survey data gathering
  • 3. Street Tree Benefits:  Trees are a valuable asset to Fairfax City. They naturally:  Reduce stormwater runoff  Lower summer air temperatures  Reduce air pollution  Reduce heating and cooling costs  Reduce atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2)  Enhance property values  Provide wildlife habitat  Improve health and wellbeing  Improve learning and concentration  Provide aesthetic benefits Picture Credit: Ashley Anne Strobridge
  • 4. 75% $142,489 9% $16,721 8% $16,112 5% $8,845 2% $2,858 1% $2,487 Aesthtic/Property Value Increase StormWater Runoff Reduction Stored CO2 Energy Savings Air Quality Improvement CO2 Sequestered & Avoided $189,512 Total Annual Savings Benefits Annual Savings Benefits from City Trees 2,686 City Trees
  • 5. Top 5 Beneficial Tree Species in Total $ Saved per Tree $0.00 $100.00 $200.00 $300.00 $400.00 $500.00 $600.00 $700.00 White Oak Oak Silver Maple Black Poplar White Poplar $603.01 $504.30 $502.82 $433.60 $377.77 * *Silver Maple is Best of all species in analysis for Energy, Air Quality, and Stormwater savings **White Poplar has worst Air Quality rating of all species in analysis, actually subtracting value (-$9.74 per tree), but does very well in other categories **
  • 6. Focus on Stormwater: Trees Improve Water Quality and Reduce Volume and Speed of Stormwater Run-off Interception of Stormwater: • Trees intercept rainfall with their leaves and branches, creating slow stemflow of water into the ground • Roots take up soil moisture, which creates evapotranspiration of water back into atmosphere Other Functional Benefits: • Roots of trees maintain soil stability, reducing erosion • Roots and soil together filter out pollutants that would otherwise end up in the watershed. This protects the Chesapeake Bay from further pollution and nutrient overload
  • 7. Trees Intercept Rainfall, Reducing Stormwater Management Costs & Helping the Ecosystem
  • 8. Could Money Grow on Trees?  Trees intercept rainfall that would otherwise become stormwater that is costly to handle via man-made structures.  In 2012, Fairfax City spent $390,000 on stormwater infrastructure improvements.  How much of that cost could have been avoided by planting more trees? Especially the right kind of trees… Picture Credit: Retrieved from 2012 City of Fairfax Budget Document
  • 9.  Trees in Fairfax City intercept 1,634,982 gallons of storm water per year for an annual savings of $16,721  Top 3 $/tree species for stormwater interception  Silver Maple = $109 per tree  White Oak = $97 per tree  Black Poplar = $71 per tree  Top 3 overall $ saving trees by volume of stormwater intercepted and by total money saved  Littleleaf Linden = $3,388 (~$8 per tree)  Oct. Glory Red Maple = $1,935 ($4.50 per tree)  Japanese Pagoda Tree = $1,646 (~$14.50 per tree) Snap-Shot of The City of Fairfax’s City Tree Stormwater Interception
  • 10. But Which Trees Does Fairfax City Have the MOST of? • Top 3 $ saved per tree species don’t even make chart % listing (smaller than 3.5% of population) • Silver Maple = $109 per tree (7 trees total) • White Oak = $97 per tree (1 tree total) • Black Poplar = $71 per tree (21 trees total) Only very few of the most beneficial trees! % of Total Population by Species 1) Littleleaf Linden  1st in pop size w/ 433 trees  342,225 gallons intercepted  $3,338 saved 2) Oct. Glory Red Maple  2nd in pop size w/ 430 trees  195,435 gallons  $1,935 saved 3) Jap. Pagoda  7th in pop size w/ 113 trees  166,259 gallons  $1,646 saved Top 3 by-volume savers Total Tree Pop. = 2,686
  • 11. Increasing the Stormwater Benefit Values by Increasing Amount of Most Productive Trees …But what if the City had the same number of White Oaks that it has of Littleleaf Lindens?  If we take the total $ saved by the largest population of trees (Littleleaf Linden), and divide it by the $ per tree saved, we get the number of L. Linden trees (figure not shown in iTree data). So… $3,388/$8 = 433 Littleleaf Linden trees  Then if we multiply the number of L. Lindens by the $ saved per tree of the White Oak, we get the amount that Fairfax City would save if there were as many White Oaks as there are currently Littleleaf Lindens: 433 x $97 = $42,001 potential stormwater savings!
  • 12. White Oak: Stormwater Super-Tree So if Fairfax City planted more White Oaks, it would save close to $42,001 annually from W. Oak stormwater interception ALONE over the total $16,721 from ALL SPECIES stormwater interception. That’s 2½ X the TOTAL $ in just ONE SPEICIES! $0 $5,000 $10,000 $15,000 $20,000 $25,000 $30,000 $35,000 $40,000 $45,000 Total Stormwater Benefits of All Trees Current Littleleaf Linden S.W. Benefits Potential White Oak S.W. Benefits $16,213 $3,388 $42,001 Imagine reducing that $390,000 2012 stormwater cost by $42,000! Not bad!
  • 13. The White Oak is an Overall Super-Saver  Currently there is only 1 White Oak in Fairfax City, but that lone tree already accounts for a 9,848 gallons of stormwater intercepted annually.  The White Oak is the leader in the category of Aesthetic and Property values, topping the list at a whopping $473 benefit per tree  The White Oak is also ranked 3rd of all 61 species in the survey for Energy savings, at ~$23 savings per tree annually  As the Number One Beneficial Tree at a savings of $603 per tree, it is clear that planting more White Oaks would be financially beneficial for the City of Fairfax
  • 14. Potential savings benefit if there were as many White Oaks as there are currently L. Lindens: $0 $50,000 $100,000 $150,000 $200,000 $250,000 $300,000 Current Overall City Tree Benefits Current Littleleaf Linden Benefits Current White Oak Benefits Potential White Oak Benefits $189,512 $41,568 $603 $261,099 The savings potential from ONE species, White Oak, outstrips the TOTAL annual benefit of all trees by nearly 50%, and is over 6X the current annual benefit from the most beneficial- due-to-volume tree species, Littleleaf Linden
  • 15. Feasibility of Planting More White Oaks  According to Merrifield Garden Center, White Oaks do well in this region  Merrifield G.C. sells W. Oaks for $195 per 15 gallon tree  With a 25-30% discount for Cities who bulk order via contractor, plus a 65% planting fee added to the $195 cost per tree  Making the final total cost per tree = $224  With White Oaks benefiting the City $603 per tree, the cost of purchasing & planting the W. Oaks is offset, and there is still $379 benefit leftover per tree after initial costs are subtracted.  Littleleaf Lindens cost $325 per 2” trunk tree at Merrifield G.C., and are not available at the 15 gallon price, but still require the additional 65% planting fee.  With the 65% fee, minus 30% off, L. Lindens cost $376 per tree. And w/ L. Lindens only benefiting the City $96 per tree, that’s leaves no benefits leftover, and actually ends up costing the city $280 per tree planted
  • 16. Take Away Points  Currently, Fairfax City Trees are benefiting the City a total of $189,512 annually by:  Increasing Property Values = $142,489  Intercepting Damaging Stormwater = $16,721  Storing & Sequestering CO2 = $18,599  Providing Energy Savings = $8,845  Improving Air Quality = $2,858  Those Total Annual Benefits could be increased by 50%, with as much as $261,099 added, if more White Oaks were planted  It is theoretically feasible to plant more White Oaks in Fairfax City  These totals are subject to change due to potential inaccuracies in input data (see next slides)
  • 17. Automatic Inputs for iTree Analysis  Electricity ($/kwh): $0.0759  Natural Gas ($/Therm): $1.046  CO2 ($/lb): $0.0075  PM10 ($/lb): $2.49  NO2 ($/lb): $6.55  SO2 ($/lb): $1.97  VOC ($/lb): $6.26  Stormwater Interception ($/gal): $0.0099  Average Home Resale Value: $600,000* *Average Home Resale Value was originally ~$119,000. New value was calculated by consulting the following website: http://www.homefinders.com/county_maps/virginia/fairfax-city.php Took average price of single family homes in sampling of zip codes in Fairfax Co. ($698,319) and weighed it against the mid-lower range average price of a home in a sampling of popular Fairfax City communities (between $474,990 and $525,000) to come up with Average Home Resale Value. (Wanted to take into account that website might not list lower-end communities under “Popular Communities,” so chose mid-low value).
  • 18. More to be done…. To get the most accurate cost-benefit analysis using iTree:  Need the additional City data inputs of:  Accurate Benefit Prices (list on previous slide)  Annual Costs of City Tree Maintenance (list available) (Current analysis of benefits is most likely skewed low due to low estimations of energy/stormwater management benefit prices, & lack of tree management costs)  Need updated tree data gathered via in-field tree survey:  Gather new data on tree diameter, location  Include tree condition  Enlist help from Fairfax City High School AP Enviro Sci Students  Notes on iTree Streets  iTree Streets is iPad/tablet/smartphone compatible  Capability for GIS component

Editor's Notes

  1. Imagine reducing that $390,000 2012 stormwater costs by $42,000! Not bad!
  2. Check math & Do graphs