Although essential to the survival of open source, it remains a challenge for many developers to get the companies they work for to provide paid support. At the moment, businesses around the world aren’t doing enough in this area, and they are certainly missing out in terms of innovation in the long term.
16. Features: Vendor roadmap
Features: Vendor release cycle
Vendor lock-in
Buy back your data
Proprietary. Open Source.
Features: What you need
Features: When you need it
Features: Cutting edge
1000s of vendors
You own your data
17. License fees
One time / Annual / Recurring €€€
Pay for permission to try
Proprietary. Open Source.
License fees
€ 0.00
Invest in features, training, staff …
Cheap, (almost) risk-free POCs
Build better, not cheaper.
18. Build better, not cheaper.
Budget == 100 Proprietary Open Source Reallocation
License fees 30 0 -30
Infrastructure, etc. 15 15 0
Strategy, Design, UX 25 35 +10
Features 20 30 +10
Implementation, QA 10 20 +10
20. Seems
obvious…
Because we
are optimists
& idealists
“Because it’s the right thing to do!”
“Push community, that’s why you
are here”
“We should give back was always
our mentality”
“My future took a completely
different turn based on the fact that
we contributed to open source.”
27. The boss talk.
community contribution doesn't happen
without promotion in the community
(sessions, blog posts, webinars, etc.)
Long term, systematic thinking, v "quick
wins" ... I want to prioritise long term,
profitable systems over short term,
profitable billing codes.