7. Breast Carcinoma Statistics
• THE most common cancer in women in the United States (excluding skin cancer)
• The second most common cause of cancer mortality in women (lung cancer is first)
• One in eight women will get breast cancer, and one third of women with breast cancer will die of the disease.
• A woman’s risk of breast cancer nearly doubles if she has a 1*relative who has been diagnosed with breast
cancer.
• Less than 15% of women who get breast cancer have a family member diagnosed with it.
• About 5-10% of breast cancers can be linked to gene mutations inherited from one’s mother or father.
• Mutations of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes are the most common.
• On average, women with a BRCA1 mutation have a 55-65% lifetime risk of developing breast cancer. For women
with a BRCA2 mutation, the risk is 45%.
• Breast cancer that is positive for the BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations tends to develop more often in younger
women.
• In men, BRCA2 mutations are associated with a lifetime breast cancer risk of about 6.8%; BRCA1 mutations are
a less frequent cause of breast cancer in men.
14. Risk Factors for Development of Breast Cancer
• Genetic
• Environmental
• Hormonal
• Radiation
• History of previous breast pathology
15. Genetic Factors
• Approximately 10% breast cancers are familial (90% sporadic)
• Positive Family History, especially in 1st degree relatives (mother,
daughter, sister) confers increased risk for breast cancer
•Risk is greatest with:
• Relative with BILATERAL disease
• Relative affected at a YOUNG AGE
16. BRCA1 Gene (17q21)
• Responsible for up to 1/2 of “inherited” breast
cancers (5% of cancers)
• Increased risk of ovarian and colon cancers
(“Breast-Ovarian” cancer gene)
• 85% lifetime risk of breast cancer
• Breast cancer develops in >50% of these women
by age 50 (“Early onset” breast cancer gene)
• Carried by 1 in 200-400 people
17. BRCA2 Gene (13q)
• Responsible for up to 70% of inherited breast cancer NOT due to
BRCA1 (3.5% of cancers)
• Characterized by increased risk of breast cancer in women and MALE
breast cancer (“Male Breast Cancer” gene)
• 30-40% lifetime risk of breast cancer
18. Li-Fraumeni Syndrome (p53)
• Due to Inherited p53 Tumor Suppressor Gene Mutation (cell cycle
checkpoint)
• Family cancer syndrome characterized by increased risk of breast
cancer, osteosarcoma, soft tissue sarcomas, brain tumors, leukemia,
other
• Accounts for approximately 1% of breast cancers detected before age
40
20. Hormonal Factors
• “Incessant ovulation”: Early menarche, late menopause, nulliparity, late
age at first term pregnancy all INCREASE the risk of breast cancer.
• Oophorectomy before age 35 DECREASES the risk of breast cancer.
• Oral contraceptive use and hormone replacement therapy may be
associated with a SMALL increased risk
• Etiology: ? hormonal stimulation of proliferation and differentiation of
cycling breast epithelium.
21. Environmental Factors
• 4-5 fold greater incidence of breast cancer in industrialized countries
than in less developed countries.
• Increased risk may be related to:
• Higher fat diet
• Earlier menarche
• Less physical activity
• Decreased parity
• Later age at parity
22. Radiation Exposure
• Increased risk of breast cancer after:
• Radiation therapy for Hodgkin’s Disease in young women,
postpartum mastitis in mothers
• Survivors of atomic bomb blasts
• Increased risk when exposure is at a young age, little increase in risk
after age 40
• Indicates that the risk is GREATEST to the developing and
hormonally cycling breast
35. Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS)
• Arises in the terminal duct lobular unit (TDLU) and DOES NOT demonstrate
invasion through the myoepithelial layer and basement membrane
• DCIS is a surgically treatable entity
• The likelihood of developing an invasive carcinoma, or recurrent DCIS varies
with
a) Histologic subtype of the in situ carcinoma
b) Size/ extent of DCIS
c) Distance to the margins of excision.
DCIS is confined to
within the ductal system
36. Ductal Carcinoma in Situ
• Clinical:
• DCIS usually does not present as a palpable mass, if it does it is
usually high grade and a large lesion
• Mammogram:
• The most common method of detection is by identifying
mammographic calcifications
• The calcifications may be linear and branching...following the
lumens of the involved ducts
38. Architectural Patterns of DCIS
• Comedo
• Grade 3 nuclei and necrosis
• Often has associated microcalcifications
• Solid
• Carcinoma fills and distends the ducts
• Micropapillary
• Papillary structures that extend into the lumen of the
duct
• Cribriform
• Forms a rigid “cartwheel” pattern
46. Ductal Carcinoma in Situ, Axillary Metastases?
• In theory the risk of metastasis is 0%
• In reality, the risk is <3%
• Invasive carcinoma outside the biopsy specimen or not in the plane
of sections examined
• Invasive carcinoma in a mastectomy specimen not sampled
(mastectomy specimens are too large to entirely sample)
• Invasive carcinoma not distinguishable at the light microscopic level
(present at EM level)
• Focus of invasive carcinoma overlooked
59. INVASIVE MICROPAPILLARY CARCINOMA
• These tumour cell cluster lie within
artefactual stromal spaces caused by
shrinkage of the surrounding tissue.
• The stromal spaces lack an endothelial
lining
• Peritumoural angioinvasion may be
present in up to 60% of cases.
• Intravascular tumour emboli, lymph
node metastases and malignant cells in
pleural fluids
72. Phyllodes tumor (PT) of the breast is a rare fibroepithelial neoplasm,
• accounting for 0.3% to 1% of all breast tumors.
• morphologic continuum- from benign to malignant.
• The classification of PT is based on a combination of several histologic features,
Stromal cellularity
nuclear atypia
mitotic activity
stromal overgrowth
tumor margin
• The majority of PTs behave in a benign fashion risk of local recurrence ranging from 17%
in benign PT to 27% in malignant PT.
• Distant metastasis occurs in up to 22% of malignant PTs
PHYLLODES TUMOR
83. Sentinel Lymph Nodes
• Sentinel Lymph Node- the first draining lymph
node from a specified site
• Identified at UNC using two methods
simultaneously
• Radioactive technetium labeled sulfur colloid
• Isosulfan blue dye
• Currently:
• Sentinel LN(s) submitted to histology and examined at
multiple levels (at least 3) by H&E and, if necessary,
also with immunohistochemistry
• The remainder of the axilla is also dissected
84. Significance of Sentinel Lymph Nodes
• Sentinel lymph node examination is a valid method of determining
axillary status
• Efforts have shown improved detection of micrometastases through
concentrated examination of the most likely positive node(s)
• Complete removal of the axillary lymph nodes is no longer standard
treatment for all patients with invasive disease!
85. Estrogen and Progesterone Receptors (ER, PR)
• >50% of carcinomas are ER positive, slightly less are PR positive
• Hormone receptor positivity is associated with longer disease-free
survival, better overall survival, and longer survival after recurrence
• Hormone receptor positivity predicts better response to hormonal
(anti-estrogen) therapy:
• ER+PR+ > ER-PR+ > ER+PR- > ER-PR-
94. Increased understanding of the molecular heterogeneity that is
intrinsic to the various subtypes of breast cancer will likely shape the
future of breast cancer diagnosis, prognosis and treatment
Advances have been remarkable and have clearly translated into
better patient care ---earlier detection, better prognosis and new
targeted therapies
Two recent advances in the breast cancer -paradigm shifts:
identification of intrinsic breast tumor subtypes{which has changed
the way we think about breast cancer }
recent characterization of cancer stem cells (CSCs){ tumor initiation,
recurrence and resistance to therapy}
100. The main studies that led to the identification of intrinsic
molecular subtypes were almost completely limited to IDC, NST
did not take uncommon histologies into
account
Thus, molecular classification is more a description of the
heterogeneity of IDC rather than an exhaustive representation
of the entire BC landscape.
101. Concept of CSCs -not recent-gained significant -isolation and
characterization -tumor initiating cells
Theory
small subset of cells {tumor initiation and progression}
bulk of the tumor cells {low tumorigenic potential}
The cell of origin for CSCs is still undetermined[hypotheses]
either originate from normal cells within the stem cell hierarchy
arise from a common normal stem cell
Functional classification of breast cancer -use one or more of the CSC
markers to quantify the % of CSCs in a patient’s tumor.
FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION
102.
103. The flow, analysis and integration
of multi-dimensional molecular,
biological and clinical data from
different biomedical
sources leading to a new
classification system, diagnostic
tools and predictive models in
breast cancer
Frequency plots of luminal A and basal-like breast tumors. Microarray CGH was used to generate copy number profiles from
collections of luminal A and basal-like breast tumors. The frequency plots were calculated from segmented copy number profiles. (a) Luminal A
frequency plot was calculated from 45 tumor samples. (b) Basal-like frequency plot was calculated from 23 tumor samples.
Histological special types and molecular subtypes.
Tumours from each of the histological special types are more
homogeneous than invasive ductal carcinomas (IDC) of no special
type. IDC with osteoclastic-like giant cells, mucinous and tubular
carcinomas preferentially harbour a luminal phenotype, whilst
adenoid cystic, medullary and metaplastic breast cancers preferentially
display a basal-like phenotype. Some metaplastic breast cancers and
medullary carcinomas may display a claudin-low phenotype. Classic
lobular and micropapillary carcinomas are preferentially of luminal or
HER2 phenotypes. Apocrine carcinomas are either of molecular
apocrine or HER2 phenotype, whereas pleomorphic lobular
carcinomas may be of luminal, HER2 or molecular apocrine
phenotype. The dashed line represents a hypothetical association.
Note that the HER2 group here is defined by the presence of
HER2
gene amplification and not the ‘intrinsic gene’ defined HER2 group.
unctional classification of breast cancer. This scheme will classify breast cancer based on the tumor initiating cells. Currently there are two
proposed hypothesis: (A) either the heterogeneity seen in breast cancer arises from distinct mammary stem/progenitor cells at various levels within
the mammary stem cell hierarchy or, (B) breast cancer heterogeneity is the result of a single mammary stem/progenitor cell being transformed by vari
-
ous oncogenes which give rise to various types of cancer
The flow, analysis and integration of multi-dimensional
molecular, biological and clinical data from different biomedical
sources leading to a new classification system, diagnostic tools and
predictive models in breast cancer.