2. Case presentation
ā¢ A Thai nurse woman 40 year
ā¢ Occupation: nurse from the General Police Hospital
ā¢ Severe asthma, AR S/P HDM SCIT
ā¢ After 20 min from onset of running, she always develops chest tightness
and dyspnea
ā¢ Recoverd spontaneously after rest within 5-10 min but afraid to resume
running afterward
ā¢ Stretching exercise before running 3-5 minute
ā¢ Current medication
ā¢ Flixotide(250mcg) 2 puff bid
ā¢ Singulair 10 mg/d
ā¢ Avamys 2 puff hs
ā¢ She avoids SABA due to palpitation
3. Definition
ā¢ Transient narrowing of the lower airway after exerciseā¦ (Practice
Parameter 2016)
ā¢ With or without asthma
ā¢ Acute airway narrowing that occurs as a result of exerciseā¦(ATS 2013)
ā¢ A brief period of high-intensity exercise or increased ventilation triggers
airway narrowing that lasts 30 to 90 minutes in the absence of
treatmentā¦(Middleton 8th edition)
ā¢ Should not use the term āEIAā
ā¢ Not induced but rather trigger
Middleton 8th edition
Practice Parameter 2016
4. Epidemiology
ā¢ Occur in asthma (30-50%), non-asthma (10-20%)
ā¢ In asthma: indicate lack of asthma control, inflammation
ā¢ In non-asthma: indicate BHR
ā¢ Variable prevalence
ā¢ Higher prevalence in elite athlete than in normal
ā¢ Depend on sport, environment
ā¢ Adult&children: each 10-20%
ā¢ One study: āAgeļ āEIB
ā¢ Gender, Race
ā¢ Some studies: female > male
ā¢ African American, asian
ā¢ Season: winter > summer
Practice Parameter 2016
5. Pathophysiology
ā¢ Osmotic theory
ā¢ Thermal(or Vascular) theory
ā¢ Airway injury: athletes
MC, Eo activation
Epithelial activation
Sensory nerve stimulation
Middleton 8th edition
Practice Parameter 2016
16. Clinical Presentations
ā¢ Prototypic features: symptoms occur during or after a modest period
of high endurance physical exertion
ā¢ Shortness of breath, chest tightness, wheezing, cough, āmucus
ā¢ Chest pain (primarily in children)
ā¢ High ventilation and endurance sport
Middleton 8th edition
Practice Parameter 2016
17. Refractoriness
ā¢ Additional exercise produce less bronchoconstriction
ā¢ 50% of patients
ā¢ 1-3 (occasionally to 4 hours)
ā¢ Not fully understand mechanism
ā¢ Tolerance to the effect of mediator release
*Protective PGs generation: NSAIDs decrease refractoriness to exercise/LTD4
challenge
ā¢ Tachyphylaxis at airway SM to mediators
ā¢ Warm up: Non-pharmacologic Mx (Recommendation A)
Practice Parameter 2016
18. Differential Diagnosis of EIB
ā¢ Exercise-induced laryngeal dysfunction (e.g., VCD)
ā¢ Exercise-induced hyperventilation/dyspneaāhealthy obese
ā¢ Exercise-induced anaphylaxis
ā¢ Exercise-induced dyspneaāage appropriate
ā¢ Exertional GERD
Can be coexist or DDx
Practice Parameter 2016
19. Differential Diagnosis of EIB
ā¢ Pulmonary diseases
ā¢ Obstructive/restrictive lung disease, ILD
ā¢ Extrapulmonary diseases
ā¢ Obesity, skeletal defects, diaphragmatic paralysis, myopathies
ā¢ Cardiovascular, gastrointestinal diseases
ā¢ Psychological
Can be coexist or DDx
Practice Parameter 2016
21. Diagnosis
ā¢ Need objective exercise/surrogate challenge tests (not only from Hx)
ā¢ Symptoms: poor predictors of positive challenge tests
ā¢ No gold standard Dx
ā¢ No universal validated positivity criteria of challenge tests
Practice Parameter 2016
22. Assessment of Airway Hyperresponsiveness
ā¢ Direct
ā¢ Exogenous provoking substance applies to act directly through receptors
ā¢ Methacholine, histamine
ā¢ Low specificity for EIB (reflecting only single agonist)
ā¢ For R/O asthma in currently clinical asthma patients
ā¢ Indirect
ā¢ Trigger endogenous mediators release
ā¢ Assessing the presence of inflammatory cells and their mediators compared with
direct tests that directly provoke SM contraction.
ā¢ Exercise, osmotic agent
ā¢ More specific to Dx BHR from airway inflammation (asthma, ICS need)
ā¢ Recommended for asthma monitoring
ā¢ More sensitive than direct
Practice Parameter 2016
23. Precaution in Bronchoprovocation Tests
Middleton 8th edition
ā¢ Direct challenge:
ā¢ Elite athletes
ā¢ Remote asthma (not currently clinical asthma)
ā¢ Medications: Beta-agonist, anticholinergic
ā¢ TLC inhalations (Eosinophilic bronchitis)
ā¢ Normal (5-15%)
ā¢ Rhinitis (20-40%)
ā¢ COPD
ā¢ Indirect challenge:
ā¢ Mild, well controlled asthma
ā¢ Medications: Beta-agonist, anticholinergic
24. Standardized Exercise Challenge Test
ā¢ Control MVV, water content (dry air <10 mg H2O/L) of inh. Air
ā¢ Prefer treadmill > cycle ergometry
ā¢ Field challenge, free running: difficult to standard
ā¢ FEV1 ā„ 75%, SpO2 > 94%
ā¢ Adequate ventilation: ā„ 60% of the maximum voluntary ventilation by
using dry medical grade air
ā¢ If not available to measure MVV ļ target HR(max)
ā¢ ā„ 85% in adults (ā„ 90% in very well conditioned subj)
ā¢ ā„ 95% in children and elite athletes
ā¢ Formula: 220-Age (in years); more accurate equation, 208-0.7xAge
Practice Parameter 2016
25. Standardized Exercise Challenge Test
ā¢ On nose clip
ā¢ Exercise ramp up to target: within 2-3 min
ā¢ Maintain 4-6 min (no more than 8 min)
ā¢ Spirometry: BL, (1, 3,) 5, 10, 15, 30, 45-60 min after exercise
ā¢ After exercise: FEV1 not in full maneuvers
ā¢ Repeat FEV1 in each time point, use highest FEV1
ā¢ Positive:
ā¢ ā„ 10% drop of FEV1 compared to BL x 2 consecutive time points
ā¢ ā„ 20% drop of FEV1 compared to BL x 1 time points
Practice Parameter 2016
26. Positive Spirometric Criteria
ā¢ ā„ 10% drop of FEV1 compared to BL x 2 consecutive time points
ā¢ ā„ 15% in field challenge
ā¢ ā„ 6-10% in laboratory challenge
ā¢ ā„ 20% drop of FEV1 compared to BL x 1 time points
ā¢ Most nadir 5-10 min postexercise
ā¢ Severity from AUC
Practice Parameter 2016
ATS 2013
Age 3-6 years old: use FEV0.5
27. Typical Change in FEV1 in 8-minute Exercise
Challenge in EIB-positive Individuals
Exercise and other indirect challenges to demonstrate asthma or
exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in athletes. JACI 2008;122:238-46
28. Severity of EIB
Before the widespread use of ICS
ā¢ Mild: ā ā„10% but <25%
ā¢ Moderate: ā ā„25% but <50%
ā¢ Severe: ā ā„50%
ā¢ Currently, a decline in FEV1 of >30% in a person taking ICS would be
considered severe.
An Ofļ¬cial American Thoracic Society Clinical Practice Guideline:
Exercise-induced Bronchoconstriction, Am J Respir Crit Care Med Vol 18, 2013
29. EVH (Eucapnic Voluntary Hyperventilation)
ā¢ Indirect ungraded challenge
ā¢ Eucapnic gas mixture (5% CO2, 21% O2, and balance N2)
ā¢ Target 60-85% MVV for 6 min ļ spirometry
ā¢ FEV1 ā„ 75% predicted (if < 80% done with caution)
Practice Parameter 2016
34. Recommendations to Tests
ā¢ Use indirect challenge
ā¢ Athletes, normal PFT, no asthma: indirect ungraded challenge
(exercise, EVH)
ā¢ Athletes, normal to near-normal lung function + currently require Tx
for EIB or asthma: indirect graded challenge (mannitol)
ā¢ If negative indirect graded challenge + still suspected EIB
ļ Indirect ungraded challenge
ā¢ If negative all + still suspected EIB ļ repeat (esp. milder response)
Practice Parameter 2016
35. Pharmacologic & Nonpharmacologic Tx
ā¢ Prevent symptoms before exercise: prophylaxis drug, warm up
ā¢ Relieve symptoms induced by exercise: rescuer
ā¢ Enhance asthma control: controller (āseverity of EIB)
ā*Patient educationā
Goal of Therapy
*
None completely eliminates EIB (just shift dose-response relationship)
Need regular F/U: variable responses to medications in different times (evidence A)
Practice Parameter 2016
40. Pharmacologic Mx: ATS 2013
ā¢ SABA before exercise
ā¢ Mast cell stabilizing agents and Inh anticholinergic: secondary role
ā¢ If Symptoms despite inhaling SABA before exercise, or require
inh.SABA daily or more frequently
ļ Daily ICS or LTRA ļ¬rst, made on a case-by-case basis
ā¢ Patient preferences, lung function
ā¢ Antihistamine if EIB+Allergies
ā¢ against antihistamines in EIB without allergies
ā¢ Against daily inh.LABA as single therapy
ATS 2013
42. Pharmacologic Mx: Practice Parameter 2016
ā¢ Preexercise prevention
ā¢ SABA/LABA, LTRA, Mast cell stabilizer
ā¢ Inh. anticholinergic for prevent EIB: inconsistent results in studies
ā¢ Rescuers
ā¢ SABA
ā¢ Inh. anticholinergic: if not responsive to SABA
ā¢ Maintenance
ā¢ Daily ICS
ā¢ LTRAs: if ICS alone was not effective
ā¢ Add on theophylline (adjunctive Tx)
ā¢ Not use daily SABA/LABAs with or without ICS
ā¢ (except ICS/LABA in moderate to severe persistent asthma)
ā¢ No definitive study on anitihistamine in EIB
Practice Parameter 2016
44. Tolerance of Ī²-Agonists
Effect of the drug: require a large fraction of available Ī²2 receptors
ā¢ āDuration
ā¢ āMagnitude of protection,recovery after
FEV1 dropping
ā¢ Prolong recover after EIB
ā¢ Cross-tolerance
ā¢ Can occur rapid (12-24 hr after a 1st dose),
recover in 72hr from last dose
ā¢ Interval to prevent: 48-72hr
ā¢ Occur in most pts
ā¢ Mechanism: uncoupling, internalize Ī²2
receptors
ā¢ ICS does not prevent tolerance
Middleton 8th edition
Practice Parameter 2016
45. LT Inhibitors
ā¢ Not lead to tolerance
ā¢ Incomplete protection (not inhibit other mediators)
ā¢ Unable to reverse AWO but accerelate time to recover
ā¢ Efficacy: 30-80% (50% = responder) attenuate EIB
ā¢ FDA approved montelukast for Tx EIB in adolescent, adult
ā¢ LTRA: Onset 1-2 hr, duration 24 hr
ā¢ 5-LO inhibitor: duration 4 hr (not currently recommended for EIB)
Practice Parameter 2016
46. Mast Cell Stabilizer
ā¢ Inhaled cromolyn sodium, nedocromil sodium
ā¢ Not available in US now
ā¢ Rapid onset, short duration (1.5-2 hr)
ā¢ No bronchodilator activity
ā¢ Excellent safety profile, no tolerance
ā¢ MonoTx or combine Tx
Practice Parameter 2016
47. ICSs
ā¢ Decrease frequency, severity of EIB
ā¢ Controller for moderate-to-severe persistent asthma
ā¢ High dose ICS: seen effect as early as 4 hr
ā¢ Time dependent (longer duration > 12 wk)
ā¢ No difference between different doses
ā¢ Variable interpersonal responses
ā¢ INS + ICS or ICS alone in EIB with AR?
ā¢ LABA+ICS for on-demand Tx vs low dose ICS: same magnitude
reduction of EIB over 6 weeks
Practice Parameter 2016
48. Anticholinergic
ā¢ Inhaled ipratropium bromide
ā¢ If no response to other agents
ā¢ Bronchodilator activity
ā¢ Inconsistent effect in all patients and each patient
Practice Parameter 2016
49. Methylxanthines
ā¢ Theophylline, aminophylline
ā¢ Non-selective phosphodiesterase inhibitors of cAMP, cGMP
ā¢ Mild bronchodilator (no effect by oral route)
ā¢ Narrow therapeutic index
ā¢ SE: seizure
ā¢ Roflumilast: selective PDE4 inhibitor ļ attenuate mild EIB, lower SE
ā¢ Caffeine 6-10mg/kg ļ attenuate EIB
Practice Parameter 2016
53. Nonpharmacologic Mx
ā¢ Preexercise warm up: target 60-80% HR max (combine to SABA)
ā¢ ATS 2013: interval or moderately vigorous exercise
ā¢ Humidification of inspired air (face mask)
ā¢ Limit activity rather than pharmacologic Tx in airway injury model
ā¢ Diet (3 weeks)ā¦Evidence A (but weak recommendation)
ā¢ Low salt diet (2-5 weeks)
ā¢ Omega-3 FA (PUFA)
ā¢ Ascorbic acid
ā¢ Ī²-carotene
ā¢ Lycopene
Practice Parameter 2016
54. Warm-Up Exercise
ā¢ ATS 2013: Interval high intensity or Combination(variable) intensity1
ā¢ Interval high intensity
Schnall RP, et al protocol2
ā¢ Sprint 30 sec to reach ā„100%VO2 max X 7
ā¢ 2.5 minutes separate each sprint
ā¢ Rest 20 minutes
Mickleborough, et al3
ā¢ After stretching 5 min, sprint 30 sec X 8
ā¢ 45 seconds separate each sprint
ā¢ Rest 15 minutes
ā¢ Combination(variable) intensity
Schnall RP, et al protocol2
ā¢ 6 minutes run
ā¢ Rest 10 minutes
ā¢ Sprint 30 sec to reach ā„100%VO2 max X 7
ā¢ 2.5 minutes separate each sprint
ā¢ Rest 20 minutes
1.Parsons JP, et al. An ofļ¬cial American Thoracic Society clinical practice guideline:
exercise induced bronchoconstriction. AmJRespirCritCareMed 2013;187:1016-27.(IV).
2.Schnall RP, Landau LI. Protective effects of repeated short sprints in exercise-induced
asthma. Thorax. 1980;35(11):828ā32.
55. Stickland MK, et al. Effect of warm-up exercise on exercise-induced
bronchoconstriction. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2012;44:389ā391.
57. Effects of Fish Oil Supplementation on Severity of
Exercise-Induced Bronchoconstriction
Middleton 8th edition
Another study showed no inhibition of EIB by fish oil
58. Summary
ā¢ EIB in asthma: Osmotic change ļ MC, Eo release bronchoconstrictive
mediators
ā¢ EIB in athletes: Airway injury
ā¢ DDx to cardiopulmonary diseases
ā¢ Indirect challenge test
ā¢ Key Mx: Pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic