• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
Prez Ng
 

Prez Ng

on

  • 5,296 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
5,296
Views on SlideShare
3,641
Embed Views
1,655

Actions

Likes
2
Downloads
0
Comments
0

28 Embeds 1,655

https://www.insightcommunity.com 596
http://www.techdirt.com 375
http://musformation.com 319
http://www.cybearsonic.com 194
http://techdirt.com 95
http://www.levidepoches.fr 11
http://www.musformation.com 9
http://tdgarage.no-ip.info 8
http://www.levidepoches.blogs.com 5
https://www.linkedin.com 5
http://www.kotonteej.com 5
https://www.techdirt.com 4
http://garage.techdirt.com 4
http://translate.googleusercontent.com 4
http://levidepoches.blogs.com 3
http://wildfire.gigya.com 3
http://www.saunderspace.com 3
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com 2
http://rss2.com 1
http://fanyi.youdao.com 1
http://www.typepad.com 1
http://www.linkedin.com 1
http://cybearsonic.com 1
https://www.google.com 1
http://morelightmorelight.com 1
http://www.slideshare.net 1
http://slawek.zazna.com 1
http://xss.yandex.net 1
More...

Accessibility

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Prez Ng Prez Ng Presentation Transcript

    • Before « 2000 », it was great ! • Artists could become « Stars » (one-time-wonders sometimes…) • Music was sold on various physical supports (LPs, tapes, CDs…) • Radio, TV & HardWare pushed (renewed) music sales • Entertainment was « simplified »: not many choices… • Consumers had (enough) money to buy music, go to concerts when available in their area… • A few Labels (majors) and some Indies « ruled the world » • Most artists made a living mainly through sales of recorded music and partly through touring…
    • But…« A few » new technologies changed the rules of the game…
    • « Rules » as of today • Labels push some « bankable » artists and some marketing offers • Labels (Majors) see decline: sales, revenue, income… • Less: artistic development, new artists… reputation… • But: more and more music available everyday! • Consumers have many (more) choices to spend their money: •TV, Mobile services, Web, video games… • Consumers pull artists they like and evaluate many more • Artists can connect directly to their fans • Many artists have no more contracts, or only very short-term • Most artists don’t have knowledge, understanding, money to « fight » alone (be visible)… and then tend to feel « so lonely »
    • Fans Markets & Sells Creates A cc es s Music Artist/group People Ideally…
    • Fans Markets & Sells Label Creates A cc Artist/group es s Music People Usually…
    • Which means: Messy…?
    • I had a dream… X oups… idea*… * With the help of many blogs, papers, meetings, conferences…
    • People want to: • Discover music (hear, download, access, share…) • Connect and exchange (with artist, with others, with other like-minded…) • Participate financially (when motivated) • Show “love”
    • An artist, or group, wants to be: • Creative (compose…) • Visible (record, tour…) • Make « enough » money for a living…
    • « Label » wants to: • Manage and develop: – artist, music, business… • Market: – artist, music… • Sell: – tours, goods, “content”…
    • Label vs artist/group vs people/fans • Create • The artist is @ the center • Connect • The artist is the Brand • Participate • The artist needs « empowerment » • Manage • The artist has to be « on stage » • Exchange • Develop • The artist is the creative force • Sell – To make « content » live – To generate new « content » – To drive relationship with people/fans • The label is the backoffice – Supports the artist and his environment – Operates services around artist’s needs
    • Music Media Services Management Marketing Artistic Ca development Connection sua l Fa ns artist r Fans a Regul Touring Sales True Fans
    • $$$ ?! • Artist is self-produced • MMS – Owns master(s) – Evaluates needs – Signs « on-demand » contract – Is a contractor and gets paid & chooses services for services it provides – Agrees to engage with fans – Is responsible for quality • Artist needs a producer – Considered a startup => • MMS business plan for funding – Evaluates needs and funding, – Signs 360° deal with MMS makes business plan with time limit – Manages 360° deal over the – Gets part* of net margin on defined period global income – Is responsible for accounting – Gets its master(s) back when – Gets other part* of net margin costs fully covered on global income *Depending on needs/costs/funding, split can range from 30/70 to 50/50 to 70/30
    • Why everything’s in-house ? • To avoid multiple management teams • To consolidate incomes and bills • To limit/avoid middlemen • To allow a global vision of artist’s positioning • To apply quick strategic changes when needed • In-house is control, but doesn’t exclude outsourcing