Virtual machines do nothing to alter the fact that physical servers must be purchased and installed, nor do they simplify the provisioning to other data center resources.
Oracle:
The SAP Sales and Distribution (SD) Standard Application Benchmark performed on May 07, 2010, by Oracle in Burlington, MA, USA, has been certified with the following data:
Number of SAP SD benchmark users (SD Parallel): 21,000
Average dialog response time: 0.93 seconds
Throughput:
Fully processed order line items/hour: 2,306,000
Dialog steps/hour: 6,918,000
SAPS: 115,300
Average database request time (dialog/update): 0.018 sec / 0.027 sec
CPU utilization of servers: 97% (node 1 active: 97%, node 2 active: 96%)
Operating system, central server: Solaris 10
RDBMS: Oracle 11g Real Application Clusters (RAC)
SAP Business Suite software: SAP enhancement package 4 for SAP ERP 6.0
Configuration:
2 servers (2 active nodes): Oracle/Sun Fire X4470, 4 processors / 32 cores / 64 threads,
Intel Xeon Processor X7560, 2.26 GHz, 64 KB L1 cache and 256 KB L2 cache per core, 24 MB L3 cache per processor, 256 GB main memory
Certification number:
Fujitsu:
The SAP Sales and Distribution (SD) Standard Application Benchmark performed on March 08, 2010, by Fujitsu in Augsburg, Germany, was certified on March 30, 2010, with the following data:
Number of SAP SD benchmark users:
16,000
Average dialog response time:
0.96 seconds
Throughput:
Fully processed order line items/hour:
1,751,000
Dialog steps/hour:
5,253,000
SAPS:
87,550
Average database request time (dialog/update):
0.039 sec / 0.072 sec
CPU utilization of central server:
89%
Operating system, central server:
Windows Server 2008 R2 Datacenter Edition
RDBMS:
SQL Server 2008
SAP Business Suite software:
SAP enhancement package 4 for SAP ERP 6.0
Configuration:
Central server:
Fujitsu PRIMEQUEST 1800E, 8 processors / 64 cores / 128 threads,
Intel Xeon Processor X7560, 2.26 GHz, 64 KB L1 cache and 256 KB L2 cache per core, 24 MB L3 cache per processor, 512 GB main memory
Certification number: 2010010
IBM:
The SAP Sales and Distribution (SD) Standard Application Benchmark performed on March 13, 2010, by IBM in Research Triangle Park, NC, USA, was certified on March 30, 2010, with the following data:
Number of SAP SD benchmark users: 10,450
Average dialog response time: 0.98 seconds
Throughput:
Fully processed order line items/hour: 1,142,330
Dialog steps/hour: 3,427,000
SAPS: 57,120
Average database request time (dialog/update): 0.021 sec / 0.017 sec
CPU utilization of central server: 99%
Operating system, central server: Windows Server 2008 Enterprise Edition
RDBMS: DB2 9.7
SAP Business Suite software: SAP enhancement package 4 for SAP ERP 6.0
Configuration:
Central server:
IBM System x3850 X5, 4 processors / 32 cores / 64 threads,
Intel Xeon Processor X7560, 2.26 GHz, 64 KB L1 cache and
256 KB L2 cache per core, 24 MB L3 cache per processor,
256 GB main memory
Certification number: 2010012
20052010Delta / Notes
ProductIntel Xeon 5100 (3.00GHz) Intel® Xeon® X5680 (3.33GHz)
Performance per Server1Up to 5x increaseIntel internal measurements on a server side java benchmark as of Feb 2010
Server Power
Idle / Active252W idle / 354W active 117W idle / 383W activeServer idle for 16 hours per day and active for 8 hours per day
# Servers 105215:1 server consolidation
# Racks 5 racks1 rack 5:1 Rack Consolidation
Annual kWhr281,88337,938Estimated 85% lower energy costs
Annual Energy Costs$56,376$7,588$45,169 electricity cost reduction per year. Assumes $0.10/kWhr and 2x cooling factor
OS Licensing Costs$94,500$18,900$75,600 less per year
Assumes a RHEL 1yr license at $900
Estimated Annual Cost Savings of $120,769
Cost of new HWn/a$151,200Assume $7,200 per server
Estimated Payback Period of 15 months
20052010Delta / Notes
ProductIntel Xeon 5100 (3.00GHz) Intel® Xeon® X5680 (3.33GHz)
Performance per Server1Up to 5x increaseIntel internal measurements on a server side java benchmark as of Feb 2010
Server Power
Idle / Active 252W idle / 354W active 117W idle / 383W activeServer idle for 16 hours per day and active for 8 hours per day
# Servers needed105215:1 server consolidation
# Racks needed5 racks1 rack 5:1 Rack Consolidation
Annual kWhr281,88337,938Estimated 85% lower energy costs
Annual Energy Costs$56,376$7,588$45,169 electricity cost reduction per year. Assumes $0.10/kWhr and 2x cooling factor
OS Licensing Costs$94,500$18,900$75,600 less per year
Assumes a RHEL 1yr license at $900
Estimated Annual Cost Savings of $120,769
Cost of new HWn/a$151,200Assume $7,200 per server
Estimated Payback Period of 15 months
Oracle x86 Cluster:
Most inclusive IT strategy
Oracle uniquely positioned to offer integrated infrastructure, resource provisioning (virtualization), DB, applications, and application management.
HP Matrix:
Matrix is a packaging exercise, not engineering
Matrix does not include the application, DB, and application management components
I. Building on a proven track record, Oracle Solaris is ready to take advantage of the groundbreaking performance capabilities of the Intel Xeon processor 7500 series and Intel Xeon
processor 5600 series. Significant performance innovation comes from optimizations of the individual cores and the overall multicore microarchitecture, which increase both single threaded and multithread performance. As a result, the Oracle Solaris kernel and existing single- or multithreaded applications will run faster, with no code changes or recompilation necessary.
II. Intel Hyper-Threading is an energy-efficient means of increasing performance for multi-threaded workloads, especially in multi-socket systems. Oracle Solaris has an outstanding threading model for commercial workloads running on production systems with dozens of sockets and multiple terabytes of memory.
III. Intel Turbo Boost Technology converts any available power headroom into higher frequencies. In those situations where maximum processing power is required, the next generation Intel Xeon processor increases the frequency in the active core when conditions such as load, power consumption and temperature permit it.
IVSun development tools are integrated to take advantage of specific features in the next generation Intel Xeon processor. Intel and Sun believe that the combination of Sun’s Sun Studio and NetBeans development tools running on the Intel Xeon processor provide a leading edge platform for ISVs to develop and deliver applications, with many optimizations for the latest Intel processors that drive record-setting performance (see benchmark slide). Sun dev tools also take advantage of MPO, important in NUMA (large systems) architectures. Oracle Solaris Dynamic Tracing (DTrace) technology provides very detailed tracing and observability, making it possible to detect performance bottlenecks in remarkably short periods of time.
EVIDENCE:
Based on internal testing by Oracle Corp., the following preliminary indications of performance and
scalability of Oracle Solaris on Intel Xeon processor 5600 and 7500 series were obtained:
• Near Linear Scalability: Oracle Solaris showed near linear scalability in several benchmarks:
• Commercial workload: On a 4-socket system using the Intel Xeon processor 7500 series (8 cores
per socket), scalability was nearly linear on a real-world representation of a transactional database
workload using Oracle 11g Release 2.
• Java™ server side workload: Performance of a Java server side benchmark scaled with near
linearity when going from a 4- to 8-socket Intel Xeon processor 7500 series system running Oracle
Solaris.
• Memory-intensive workload: A memory bandwidth intensive benchmark demonstrated more than
linear performance scaling, going from 4 to 8 sockets, using Intel Xeon processor 7500 series
systems running Oracle Solaris.
• CPU-intensive workload: A CPU-intensive benchmark scaled more than linearly in performance,
going from 4 to 8 sockets, using Intel Xeon processor 7500 series systems running Oracle Solaris.
• More Performance and Throughput: A prominent MCAE HPC workload run on Intel Xeon processor
5600 series (6-core Westmere-EP) achieved 50% more throughput compared to a similarly
configured system based on the Intel Xeon processor 5500 series (4-core Nehalem-EP). Oracle
Solaris was able to use all 24 available processing threads to schedule jobs.
DB server: Sun Fire X4470 (4 x Intel Xeon processor X7560 @ 2.27 GHz, 131 GB memory)
- Without flash: 4 x 136.73 GB SAS HDD
- With flash: 2 x 24 GB Sun Flash Modules
Workload: iGen-OLTP v1.6 Oracle 11gR2
Power Calculator versions used (03/03/10):
Sun: Internal measurements
HP Bladesystem Power Sizing Tool v3.19.0
IBM BladeCenter and System X Power Configurator v 4.5.1.33 (4/28/10)
Power Calculations (chassis configured with 10 blades):
Blade Configuration specifics: 2x X5670 Westmere-EP (2.93GHz, 95W) processors
2x 500GB SATA HDDs
12x 4GB DIMMs
2x (embedded) GbE Links
Chassis configurations: Sun Blade 6000 Chassis with: 2x 5600w Power Supply Modules (N+N Redundancy) 6x Cooling Fans 2x GbE Pass-thru NEMs 1x Chassis Monitoring Module HP c7000 Chassis with: 4x 2250w Power Supplies (N+N Redundancy) 8x Cooling Fans 2x Ethernet Pass-thru Modules 1x Onboard Administrator
1x BladeCenter H Chassis with 2x Copper Pass-thru GbE Modules
10x HS22 Blades
Each Blade configured with:
2x X5670 CPUs
2x 500GB SATA HDDs
12x 4GB DIMMs
2x (embedded) GbE links, 1 to each GbE PT Module
100% Utilization:
Sun config: 312.9 W
HP config: 369.9 W
IBM config: 374.0 W
Power Cost calculations
note: .1032 c/kWh is the commercial cost (avg. for 2008 & 2009) per kWh … found at
http://www.eia.doe.gov/fuelelectric.html
SUN Config: 312.9w/hr (100% utilization) x 8760 hrs. per year = 2,741 kWh/yr
2,741 kWh/yr x .1032 per kWh = $282.87 annual power cost
HP Config: 369.9w/hr (100% utilization) x 8760 hrs. per year = 3,240 kWh /yr
3,240 kWh /yr x .1032 per kWh = $334.40 annual power cost
IBM Config: 374.0w/hr (100% utilization) x 8760 hrs. per year = 3,276 kWh /yr
3,240 kWh /yr x .1032 per kWh = $338.11 annual power cost
Carbon footprint: http://www.42u.com/efficiency/energy-efficiency-calculator.htm
2741 kWh/yr / 1658.7 kWh/ton CO2 = 1.65 tons CO2 / yr
3240 kWh/yr / 1658.7 kWh/ton CO2 = 1.95 tons CO2 / yr
3276 kWh/yr / 1658.7 kWh/ton CO2 = 1.98 tons CO2 / yr
The hardware swap in/out analysis : (HP: 13 steps, 6 minutes 30 second
duration vs. SUN: 6 steps, 30 seconds duration) 13 steps for the I/O upgrade in the
HP Blade system vs 6 steps in the SB Modular
System translates to over 50% faster upgrade process for the Sun blade chassis.
The SB6000 continue providing service (at reduced bandwidth/redundancy levels)
throughout the upgrade, but the HP system has to be completely shut down for
essentially the full process of the upgrade.
Values shown above represent configurations consisting of 1x Blade Chassis populated with 1x Blade and 2x GbE pass-thru modules. Each blade is configured with 2x E5540 CPUs, 12x 4GB DIMMs, 2x 146GB SAS HDDs and 2x (on-board) GbE Links
Power Calculator versions used (03/03/10):
Sun: On-line Sun Blade 6000 Power Calculator
HP: BladeSystem Power Sizing Tool v3.15.0
Virtual Machines Calculation:
Sun X6270 has 18 DIMM slots, using 8GB DIMMs max memory = 144GB
HP BL460c G6 has 12 DIMM slots, using 8GB DIMMs max memory = 96GB (*note: BL460c G6 does offer 16GB DIMMs)
Avg. 2GB memory required per virtual machine @ 70% utilization
X6270 = 144GB / 2GB per VM = 72 Virtual Machines x .70 utilization = 50.4 Virtual Machines per blade x 10 blades = 504 Virtual Machines
BL460c G6 = 96GB / 2GB per VM = 48 Virtual Machines x .70 utilization = 33.6 Virtual Machines per blade x 10 blades = 336 Virtual Machines
Power Calculations:
Configuration specifics: Sun X6270 Blades HP BL460c G6 Each blade with: 2x E5540 CPUs 12x 4GB DIMMs 2x 146GB SAS HDDs 2x (on-board) GbE Chassis configurations: Sun Blade 6000 Chassis with: 2x 5600w Power Supply Modules (N+N Redundancy) 6x Cooling Fans 2x GbE Pass-thru NEMs 1x Chassis Monitoring Module HP c7000 Chassis with: 4x 2250w Power Supplies (N+N Redundancy) 8x Cooling Fans 2x Ethernet Pass-thru Modules 1x Onboard Administrator 100% Utilization:
Sun config: 277.9w
HP config: 351.5w
Power Cost calculations
note: .1032 c/kWh is the commercial cost (avg. for 2008 & 2009) per kWh … found at
http://www.eia.doe.gov/fuelelectric.html
SUN Config: 277.9w/hr (100% utilization) x 8760 hrs. per year = 2,434 kWh/yr
24,344 kWh/yr x .1032 per kWh = $251.23 annual power cost
HP Config: 351.5w/hr (100% utilization) x 8760 hrs. per year = 3,079kWh /yr
30,791 kWh/yr x .1032 per kWh = $317.76 annual power cost
Carbon footprint: http://www.42u.com/efficiency/energy-efficiency-calculator.htm
Footnotes
(6)Micros Fidelio case study: grew 50% and only added 25% more staff; IDC White Paper Sponsored by HP, Gaining Business Value and ROI with HP Insight Control, Doc # #218069, May 2009
(7)IDC White Paper Sponsored by HP, Realizing TCO Savings with HP BladeSystem Virtual Connect Flex-10 Technology, Doc # 218222, May 2009 (approved)
(8)Product specs
(9)Dynamic Power Capping TCO and Best Practices White Paper, http://h71028.www7.hp.com/ERC/downloads/4AA2-3107ENW.pdf
(10)Virtual Connect Flex 10 product specs