Restaurant food critics will be a valuable tool when selecting an eatery. In March 2008 the entire restaurant review trade came underneath scrutiny from court case arising from a brutal but honest review of Belfastian pizzeria Goodfellas by the Irish News, the review that criticised the food, employees and atmosphere led to the restaurant being awarded £25,00zero in libel damages.
Ride the Storm: Navigating Through Unstable Periods / Katerina Rudko (Belka G...
A review of restaurant reviews
1. A Review of Restaurant Reviews
Restaurant food critics will be a valuable tool when selecting an eatery. In March 2008
the entire restaurant review trade came underneath scrutiny from court case arising from
a brutal but honest review of Belfastian pizzeria Goodfellas by the Irish News, the review
that criticised the food, employees and atmosphere led to the restaurant being awarded
£25,00zero in libel damages. This decision went somewhat unnoticed by many, but its
outcome could have modified review writing, opening the door for companies to take
action after they feel they need been unfairly ‘done over’ by a review. However, upon
appeal the case call was overturned on the basis that the original jury was unfairly guided
by the choose.
This case has brought to light-weight many questions on the relevance and validity of
reviews; the main being that a review could be a persons personal opinion it is not a
certified nor a mediated analysis- it might be said that to curtail reviews would be to limit
a persons freedom to speech, any to the present, as unfairly as it is a review published is
usually tailored to the magazine and its readership expectations- the New York Times
food critic reviewer is renowned for being robust yet is that this their true opinions or do
they’re going with the foremost fashionable possibility or what’s expected? When after
all their favorite nosh secretly comes from the Hard Rock Café? Looking at reviewers
who perhaps provide out too sensible reviews; suspicion would lead me to assume that
opinions are swayed by advertisers and investors.
2. Reviewers should not be influenced by any external factors their job is to act as an
independent ombudsman of sorts providing recommendation and guidance on where we
tend to should dine. From all the press coverage of the ‘Good fellas case’ there appears to
be a complete disregard for the benefit readers got from the review, the words could have
been excessive but the very fact remained that the food was unsatisfactory according to
the critic.
If you go online there is abundance of blogs that can provide you a selection of restaurant
reviews, online reviews are a useful tool for obtaining a maybe a lot of varied and honest
review; the reasoning for this being that always bloggers don’t seem to be swayed by
advertisers nor limited by their readers demographics. Much just like the newspapers and
magazines, it will be one one that is writing the review however individuals will boost it,
posting comments regarding their own experience with a restaurant. Once a restaurant
review blog gains popularity and folks are often leaving comments then it becomes a
valuable resource for diverse and honest opinions. As individuals are attending the
restaurant socially instead of with the only real purpose of reviewing it the result can be
totally different experience altogether and the retelling of their experience, for example
taking their four youngsters into a quiet bistro, might be of relevance to somebody
considering going with their own children. Therefore restaurant review blogs are very
different to the reviews you browse within the papers; and overall a lot of useful.
My best Restaurant Reviews Broward County and Restaurant Reviews Palm Beach
County