1. Bridging the Theory-Policy Gap in Foreign and Security Policy An idiosyncratic view Stephan De Spiegeleire Senior Scientist The Hague Centre for Strategic Studies DIIS seminar "Academia and Foreign Policy Making: Bridging the Gap“ Copenhagen, April 26
5. Benchmarking Think Tanks (1 of 2) Funding Partisan Scope Basic MO Size Profit Fixed Partisan Tactical Opinion Small Profit Market Non-Partisan Strategic Evidence Large Non-Profit ?
6. Benchmarking Think Tanks (2 of 2) Methodology Technology Focus Personality Network Home-market Weak Unimportant Security Important Small Weak Key Important Comprehensive Irrelevant In-House Strong
7.
8.
9.
10. We need a (European?) lubricant... EU ISS? Knowledge management
11.
12.
13.
Editor's Notes
Have been living in the gap since at least 1989 (RAND/UCLA) Quite personal and idiosyncratic take on this, influenced by my own experiences at RAND, SWP, ISS/(W)EU, now 10 years in Holland (uniquely propitious microclimate for this, certainly in Europe, even though it’s still far from perfect) and my observations over the past 20 years Foreign policy writ large – beyond the stovepipes, comprehensive approach => foreign and security policy Second attempt at this – seminar at WEU-ISS in 99
Integrative
There IS a window, but will not happen automatically; need for a lubricant (EU-ISS ideally placed for this)