Case Study for a GPS installation at the Port of Liverpool.

The terminal • Around 800,000 TEU PA • Capacity of 1M TEU PA • 34 Straddle Carriers • 7 STS Cranes • Second Terminal plannedInternational Terminal Solutions Ltd © 2011 www.portautomation.com Slide 3 of 25

The reasons for change WHY CHANGE? • Only 25 of the 34 carriers installed with PDS • Legacy system restricting operational development • Lack of business visibility • Lost containers 3% (not in correct block) • Misplaced units 15% (wrong slot in block) • Export re-handles 10% (prior to loading)International Terminal Solutions Ltd © 2011 www.portautomation.com Slide 5 of 25

The reasons for change Impact on productivity prior to change IMPACT OF HIGH YARD STACKING AGAINST PRODUCTIVITY 130% 22 128% 21.3 WEEKLY AVERAGE MOVES PER HOUR WEELY AVERAGE YARD UTILISATION 21 120% 120% 20.21 19.96 20 110% 110% 19 UTILISATION 100% 100% 18.19 PRODUCTIVITY 18 90% 90% 17.15 17 16.4 80% 80% 16 70% 15 1 2 3 4 5 6 UTILISATION 80% 90% 100% 110% 120% 128% PRODUCTIVITY 21.3 20.21 19.96 18.19 17.15 16.4International Terminal Solutions Ltd © 2011 www.portautomation.com Slide 6 of 25

The reasons for change THE BENEFITS OF CHANGE • Realisable operational efficiencies • Foundation for future operational developments • Get best value from TOS software • Increase optimal yard capacity • Future proof systems and long term reliabilityInternational Terminal Solutions Ltd © 2011 www.portautomation.com Slide 7 of 25

Technology G-POS Driver authentication Modular System Request card authorisation Operator OK – allow SC movement database TOS logon Request OK – TOS user accepted TOSInternational Terminal Solutions Ltd © 2011 www.portautomation.com Slide 12 of 25

Technology G-POS Basic PDS reporting Modular System X Y Z coordinates Send Move Instruction Automatic lift confirmation Automatic set confirmation TOS Automatic position updateInternational Terminal Solutions Ltd © 2011 www.portautomation.com Slide 13 of 25

Technology G-POS Automatic job steps Modular System Send Job step Automatic request - next step TOS Automatic lift confirmationInternational Terminal Solutions Ltd © 2011 www.portautomation.com Slide 14 of 25

Technology G-POS Move compliance Modular System Send Move Instruction Actual Lift location checked TOS If wrong - twistlock disabled If OK lift allow & confirmed If pick up or grounding in wrong Move location is required remote management override console complianceInternational Terminal Solutions Ltd © 2011 www.portautomation.com Slide 15 of 25

Technology G-POS Equipment status monitoring Modular System Management and operations receive live updates of status Carrier fault Maintenance report E-SMART Updates status System provides console visualisation and performance statisticsInternational Terminal Solutions Ltd © 2011 www.portautomation.com Slide 16 of 25

Key operational outcomes • Operates reliably in all weathers • System availability Pre G-POS 34% typical G-POS go-live 99.98% • Yard accuracy Pre G-POS 80% typical G-POS go-live 99.9+%International Terminal Solutions Ltd © 2011 www.portautomation.com Slide 24 of 25

Key operational outcomes - Source Peel Ports 22% increase in available stacking area Productivity enhancements of up to 20% 95% of trucks serviced within 60 minutes 65% of trucks serviced within 30 minutes 30% improvement on previous performanceInternational Terminal Solutions Ltd © 2011 www.portautomation.com Slide 25 of 25

Case Study for a GPS installation at the Port of Liverpool.

by richardmlambert on Jun 20, 2011

Accessibility

Categories

Tags

Upload Details

Usage Rights

Statistics

Case Study for a GPS installation at the Port of Liverpool. — Presentation Transcript