Comparing JVM Web Frameworks - TSSJS 2011

INTRODUCTIONSYour experience with webdevelopment?Your experience with JavaEE development?What do you want to getfrom this session?Experience with Grails,GWT, Rails, Spring MVC,Wicket, Tapestry or Play? © 2011, Raible Designs

E L I M I N AT E , D O N ’ T I N C L U D E

... while Id *love* to see life made simpler for Java webdevelopers, and a lot of the things happening in Struts2 aregoing that way -- it wont be me doing it.Ive gone over to the dark side :-) and much prefer to developin Rails -- for the conciseness mentioned above, but alsobecause I dont ever have to do a "build" or "deploy" stepduring my development cycle any more. But you guys andgals need to be reminded that *this* is the kind of thing youare competing against if you expect to attract Railsdevelopers ... or to avoid even more "previously Java webdeveloper" defectors like me :-). -- Craig McClanahan, 10/23/2007 http://markmail.org/thread/qfb5sekad33eobh2 © 2011, Raible Designs

CHOOSING A FRAMEWORKChoose a short list of frameworks to prototype with.Create an application prototype with eachframework.Document ﬁndings and create a matrix withimportant criteria.Create presentation to summarize document.Deliver document, presentation andrecommendation. © 2011, Raible Designs

2011: COMPARISON POINTS13. i18n and l10n14. Validation15. Multi-language Support (Groovy / Scala)16. Quality of Documentation/Tutorials17. Books Published18. REST Support (client and server) © 2011, Raible Designs

RATINGS LOGIC13. i18n and l10n14. Validation15. Multi-language Support (Groovy / Scala)16. Quality of Documentation/Tutorials17. Books Published18. REST Support (client and server) © 2011, Raible Designs

DAVID POLLACK’S LIFT RATINGSDeveloper Productivity: Lift gets a 11, Rails gets a 5,most Java-based frameworks get a 1 or less.Developer Perception: Every web framework gets a 1. Learning Curve: Lift gets a 2.Job Trends, yep, its zero.* Matts scale is 0-1 and my ratings are on Matts scale, except mine goes to 11. http://lift.la/my-take-on-matt-raibles-spreadsheet © 2011, Raible Designs

PETER THOMAS’S PERFBENCHOn the Seam / JSF side, the 20 sessions each take upabout 800 KB adding up to around 16 MB total. Onthe Wicket side the 20 sessions add up to around 1.5MB.+ Lots of banter between Peter and Seam developers@ http://bit.ly/3X50Gc © 2011, Raible Designs

PETER THOMAS’S PERFBENCHPeter’s Observations: Grails was far more productive than Tapestry 5. Grails still has some ways to go in terms of performance. Overall, Wicket is fastest, with Tapestry coming a close second. Wicket takes up the least amount of heap. Session usage of the Seam + JSF combination is signiﬁcantly higher compared to the rest. © 2011, Raible Designs

GRAILSPros Easy dynamic language transition for Java Developers Groovy Plugins for all types of applicationsCons Groovy learning targets Java Developers Stack traces are horrendous Knowledge of underlying frameworks not required, but helpful © 2011, Raible Designs

GWTPros Write Java => Produces Optimized JavaScript Easy to learn and develop with standard Java Tools Vibrant CommunityCons You have to know Java Slow to compile, difﬁcult to test More like a JSP Tag Library than a web framework © 2011, Raible Designs

RUBY ON RAILSPros Easy to learn and understand for Web Developers Lots and lots of documentation Passionate CommunityCons Slightly less performant by default Dynamic language means more tests Development Tools and Debugging © 2011, Raible Designs

SPRING MVCPros Easy Conﬁguration with Annotations and Conventions Integrates with many view options seamlessly: JSP/JSTL, Tiles, FreeMarker, Excel, PDF, JSON Excellent REST SupportCons Instant reload not built-in, need JRebel or Spring Roo No open development process, need to be SpringSource Ajax requires 3rd-party library (can be a good thing!) © 2011, Raible Designs

VAADINPros Uses GWT API for developing view. Vibrant Community and company backing. Excellent Themes and Layouts support.Cons Large memory footprint, state stored in session. Doesn’t use JSON for communication. Commercial backing with Pro version. © 2011, Raible Designs

WICKETPros Great for Java Developers Tight binding between pages and views Active community - support from creatorsCons No Jobs or Developers Stateful by default HTML Templates live next to Java code by default © 2011, Raible Designs

TAPESTRYPros Live Class Reloading Development emphasis on performance and scalability Excellent Exception ReportingCons No Jobs Prototype baked in for JS Library Annotations vs. Conventions © 2011, Raible Designs

LANGUAGE PERFORMANCE Time (ms) per iteration 600 400 200 0 Java C++ JRuby Python Groovy PHPhttp://blog.dhananjaynene.com/2008/07/performance-comparison-c-java-python-ruby-jython- jruby-groovy/ © 2011, Raible Designs

CHOOSE YOUR OWN!Prioritize a list of features that are important to yourapplication.Pick 3-4 frameworks and do a 1-week spike witheach, developing the same application.Document and rank each framework against your listof features.Calculate and choose! © 2011, Raible Designs

http://raibledesigns.com	2205
http://www.oyous.com	91
http://anandloni.blogspot.com	28
http://supportcentral.ge.com	28
http://static.slidesharecdn.com	16
http://www.raibledesigns.com	13
http://devcafe.nhncorp.com	11
http://cache.baidu.com	4
http://www.anandloni.blogspot.com	3
http://10.150.200.76	2
http://127.0.0.1	2
http://anandloni.blogspot.fr	1
http://anandloni.blogspot.in	1
http://feeds.feedburner.com	1
http://mail.nhncorp.com	1
http://a0.twimg.com	1
http://dashboard.bloglines.com	1
https://testfor367.appspot.com	1
http://www.ig.gmodules.com	1
http://paper.li	1
http://translate.googleusercontent.com	1
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com	1

Comparing JVM Web Frameworks - TSSJS 2011

by Matt Raible on Mar 17, 2011

Accessibility

Categories

Tags

Upload Details

Usage Rights

22 Embeds 2,414

Statistics

Comparing JVM Web Frameworks - TSSJS 2011 — Presentation Transcript