3. •
現在のCSXの定義は以下の通り
•
典型的な安定狭心症,
特に労作時に多い.
•
心筋虚血や冠動脈の
Microvascularの障害が検査で示唆.
•
•
•
Table 1 Proposed definition of cardiac syndrome X
l Typical stable angina, exclusively or predominantly induced by effort
l Findings compatible with myocardial ischaemia/coronary
microvascular dysfunction on diagnostic investigation*
l Normal (or near normalÀ) coronary arteries at angiography
l Absence of any other specific cardiac disease (for example, variant
angina, cardiomyopathy, valvular disease)
*Including one or more of (1) diagnostic ST segment depression during
spontaneous or stress-induced typical chest pain; (2) reversible perfusion
defects on stress myocardial scintigraphy; (3) documentation of stressrelated coronary blood flow abnormalities by more advanced diagnostic
techniques (for example, cardiac magnetic resonance (MR), positron
emission tomography (PET) or Doppler ultrasound); (4) metabolic evidence
of transient myocardial ischaemia (cardiac PET or MR, invasive assessment).
ÀVascular wall irregularities or discrete very mild stenosis (,20%) in
epicardial vessels at angiography.
Heart 2007;93:159–166
mechanisms. This is not surprising, however, as up to 15–20%
CAGで正常, 狭窄を認めない(20%未満の狭窄も含む) CAD also have no apparent risk
of patients with obstructive
factor.
A further point of the proposed definition of CSX concerns
patients with minor atherosclerotic lesions (that is, irregula他に同様の症状を来す心疾患を認めない mild stenosis of , 20%) in epicardial vessels at
rities or very
these
by the
(Variant angina, 心筋症, 弁膜症等) angiography. The inclusion ofcannotpatients is justified angina
fact that these abnormalities
be responsible for
symptoms, that some degree of coronary atherosclerosis may
also be found by intracoronary ultrasound imaging in a
proportion of patients with classic CSX,3 and that their clinical
outcome seems similar to that of patients with classic CSX.
Finally, it should be stressed that coronary microvascular
abnormalities may be involved in angina syndromes other than
CSX, including angina after successful percutaneous coronary
interventions, microvascular vasospastic203 January 26; 5(): -7
World J Cardiol angina and some cases
of non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes with normal
VSA患者では, 冠動脈の内皮障害が認められるが,
Microvascularは保たれており, VSAとCSXは異なる病態.
4. •
典型例は閉経後女性の狭心痛; CSXの70%が女性例.
40-50歳台が好発年齢.
•
2776
primary CMVD according to the mode of presentation, i.e. either
as an acute (unstable) or chronic (stable) angina. This may help in
distinguishing pathogenic mechanisms and perhaps identifying
patients with different clinical outcomes.25 The challenge,
however, remains to identify aetiologicAugust and specific triggers
Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2012 factors ; 22(6): 161–168
(Table 4).
虚血性心疾患疑いでCAGを行った患者の内,
男性例の8%, 女性例の41%がCAG正常であった報告もある.
•
Microvascular dysfunctionでは以下に分類される
Table 2 Modified clinical classification of coronary
microvascular dysfunction
CMVD
Definition
Type 1
Primary, i.e. in the absence of structural heart disease
Type 2
In the presence of cardiomyopathies (incl. LVH, HCM,
DCM, amyloidosis)
Type 3
In the presence of obstructive CAD (incl. ACS)
Type 4
Type 5
After coronary interventions
After cardiac transplantation
................................................................................
................................................................................
Modifiers
Duration
Symptoms
Therapy
European Heart Journal (2012) 33, 2771–2781
Acute or chronic
Asymptomatic or symptomatic
None, minimal, moderate, or maximal level
ACS, acute coronary syndrome; DCM, dilated cardiomyopathy; HCM,
hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; LVH, left ventricular hypertrophy.
6. Cardiac syndrome X
163
•
•
•
•
Traditional CV risk factors
Insulin resistance
Low grade inflammation
Oestrogen deficiency (women)
•
•
•
•
Endothelial
dysfunction
Abnormal adrenergic function
Hypertension
Other CV risk factors?
Abnormal NHE activity
Smooth muscle
cell dysfunction
Impaired
vasodilation
Increased
vasoconstriction
Coronary microvascular dysfunction
Figure 4 Scheme of the main pathogenetic mechanisms and functional abnormalities that may variably contribute to microvascular dysfunction in patients
with cardiac syndrome X, according to data reported in the medical literature. CV, cardiovascular; NHE, Na+/H+ exchanger.
variability of the pathophysiological mechanisms responsible
for the syndrome.
(1) the clinical observation that recurrent chest pain is usually
the only kind of pain these patients have; (2) evidence that
abnormal pain sensitivity is confined Heart 2007;93:159–166
to the heart32–34; and (3)
8. Heterogeneous
causes
Microvascular
dysfunction
Myocardial
ischaemia
Cardiac nerve
dysfunction
Unknown
causes
Efferent, sympathergic
Afferent, nociceptive
Cardiac MIBG
defects
Abnormal cardiac
pain sensitivity
Figure 5 Possible relations between microvascular dysfunction and cardiac nerve ending abnormalities in cardiac syndrome X (CSX). Microvascular
dysfunction in patients with CSX may cause repeated episodic reduction of coronary blood flow, which may induce alterations in both efferent and afferent
cardiac nerve fibres. The abnormal efferent adrenergic function can be indicated by the reduced uptake of meta-121iodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) by the
heart, whereas abnormalities in afferent cardiac fibres may lead to increased generation and transmission of pain signals (increased cardiac pain
perception). Abnormal activity of adrenergic fibres may, in turn, influence microvascular function. Pathological mechanisms different from microvascular
dysfunction, however, may be responsible for primary cardiac nerve abnormalities, leading to the same clinical picture. Adapted from Lanza.36
casual independent occurrence of both abnormalities in the
same patient.
It should be stressed that in patients with CSX with increased
cardiac pain sensitivity,
stimuli other than
• also cause angina cardiacOn the other hand, ischaemia
may
pain.
increased
cardiac nociception can also be the only cause of angina-like
symptoms in some patients with chest pain and normal
coronary arteries, such as the few patients who develop chest
pain in relation to intermittent left bundle branch block. In
these patients several stimuli, including the physiological
cardiac release of adenosine during exercise, may cause chest
pain. These patients can be identified by the failure to find any
towards CSX. These, in particular, are a prolonged (. 15–
20 min) dull persistence of chest discomfort after resolution of
typical chest pain induced by exercise and a lack of response, or
a slow or incomplete response, to administration of shortacting nitrates to relieve pain, both features occurring in about
50% of patients.37
Among diagnostic stress tests, the careful analysis of
abnormal exercise and stress scintigraphic results also does
not usually help to identify patients with CSX. In contrast, the
induction of typical, often severe angina during echocardiographic stress test (for example, Heart 2007;93:159–166
with dipyridamole or
Microvascularの障害から心臓神経の異常を来たし,
痛覚過敏となる説がある.
9. 心筋虚血のアセスメント
Heart 2007;93:159–166
•
労作時のST低下の検出が有用.
労作時以外にもAtrial pacing, 虚血誘発薬剤でも生じる.
Holter心電図でもしばしば検出可能とされる.
•
ストレス心筋シンチでは可逆性の証明もでき,
CSX患者の50~90%異常で陽性となる.
•
同様にドブタミン負荷におけるGa造影心臓MRIでも
162
労作時の心筋虚血の検出が可能.
Lanza
Figure 2 Evidence of subendocardial septal
perfusion defect (panel A, arrow) at peak
dobutamine infusion (40 mg/kg/min) and its
absence at rest (panel B) on gadolinium
cardiac magnetic resonance in a patient with
cardiac syndrome X. No abnormalities in left
ventricular function were detectable.
11. Figure 3 Illustration of two cases of anterior myocardial infarction with the restoration of blood flow in the left anterior descending artery
(A – C, upper and lower panel). In the presence of microvascular integrity, the following can be seen: myocardial blush grade 3 (D, upper panel) a
lack of oedema, homogeneous myocardial perfusion, subendocardial anteroseptal enhancement of 25– 50% wall thickness on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI, E – G, upper panel) and normal perfusion on myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE, H, upper panel). On the contrary,
in the setting of coronary microvascular impairment, myocardial blush is poor (D, lower panel) along with a large area of oedema, an anteroseptal perfusion defect and extensive delayed enhancement with microvascular obstruction on MRI (E – G, lower panel), and a large perfusion
defect on MCE (H, lower panel). Modified from Porto et al.112 Used with the permission of Elsevier.
Microvascularが破綻した前壁
塞のCAG, MRI, perfusion echo所見;
Microvascularによるmyocardial blushが消失(D)し, 浮腫を認める
中隔の造影障害とエコーでの還流障害が認められる.
European Heart Journal (2012) 33, 2771–2781
12. Table 1 Modalities to assess coronary microvascular function
Method
Tracer
Primary parameter
Secondary
parameter
Microvascular
distinction
Endothelial Pros
assessment
Cons
.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
PET101
Radioisotopes
MBF
(0.6–1.3 mL/min/g)
MBF reserve (.2 –2.5)
No
No
Validated and reproducibility
Limited availability, radioactivity
SPECT
Radioisotopes
Perfusion
(no defect)
(Perfusion reserve)
No
No
Availability, low costs
MBF only with dynamic upgrade,
radioactivity
MDCT102
Iodine
contrast
MBF
(0.9–1.3 mL/min/g)
MBF reserve (.2 –2.5)
No
No
Availability
Investigational, image quality,
radiation
MRI103
Gadolinium
MBF
(0.7–1.1 mL/min/g)
MBF reserve (.2 –2.5)
No
No
One-stop test, no radiation or
radioactivity
Investigational, technical limitations
MCE104
Echo contrast
Perfusion, MBF option
(0.5–2.9 mL/min/g)
MBF reserve option
(.2–2.5)
No
No
One-stop test, no radiation or
radioactivity
Volumetric modelling, image quality
Doppler echo 105 Echo contrast
Flow velocity
(24–36 cm/s)
Flow reserve (.2– 2.5) No
No
One-stop test, no radiation or
radioactivity
No MBF option, position and image
dependent
TFC8
Iodine
contrast
Contrast flow velocity
(18–24)
TFC reserve (.2 –2.5)
Assumed if no
epicardial dx
No
Ease of use, low cost
No CBF option, subjectivity
MBG4
Iodine
contrast
Contrast staining (Grade 3)
None
Assumed if no
epicardial dx
No
Ease of use, low cost
No CBF option, subjectivity
ICD106
None
Flow velocity
(10–22 cm/s)
(relative) flow velocity
reserve
Assumed if no
epicardial dx
Yes
Direct measurement
No CBF option, invasiveness
ICD +QCA/
IVUS 107
Iodine
contrast
CBF
(44–59 mL/min)
CBF reserve (.2 –2.5)
Yes
Yes
Complete assessment
Costs, invasiveness
TPS108
Saline
IMF (15–22 U)
None
Yes
Yes
Complete assessment
Costs, invasiveness
PET, positron emission tomography; SPECT, single photo emission computed tomography; MDCT, multi-detector computed tomography; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; MCE, myocardial contrast echocardiography; TFC, TIMI frame
count; MBG, myocardial blush grade; ICD, intracoronary Doppler; QCA, quantitative coronary angiography; IVUS, intravascular ultrasound; TPS, temperature and pressure sensor; MBF, myocardial blood flow (mL/time/myocardial mass); CBF,
coronary blood flow (mL/time unit).
European Heart Journal (2012) 33, 2771–2781
15. ting. Obviously, the extent of underlying CAD plays an importprognostic role. This holds true also for the much-debated
ity of PMI, and no study so far has evaluated the differential
ognostic impact of PMI due to side-branch occlusion (type I or
oximal type) or microcirculatory impairment (type II or distal
e).45,46 For this reason, the prognostic implications of CMVD
he setting of PCI remain uncertain.
診断∼治療まで
ardiomyopathy
patients with dilated cardiomyopathy, a severely (.60%)
uced hyperaemic MBF response to dipyridamole increases the
ative risk of death and heart failure development or progression
times, independent of other factors such as the degree of LV
function and the presence of overt heart failure.103 Likewise,
abnormal CFR (,2) and lack of inotropic reserve in response
dipyridamole were independent predictors of survival in
ients with idiopathic DCM (adjusted harzard ratios 2.8 and
respectively).104 Importantly, the prognostic merit of severe
R impairment in heart failure is independent of CAD and the isemic burden and is evident in both ischaemic and nonhaemic cardiomyopathy.105
n hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy, the MBF response
dipyridamole potently predicts symptomatic progression to
HA class III and IV and life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias
uiring ICD placement and is an independent mortality predict106
Especially those patients with the lowest MBF response are
mingly at the highest risk (adjusted hazard ratio 10 for cardiocular mortality and 20 for all cardiovascular events), which
in becomes apparent not immediately but during long-term
ow-up (i.e. 6 years). Interestingly, these patients also had a
European Heart Journal (2012) 33, 2771–2781
Figure 5 Although the discussion of management strategies is
beyond the scope of the present manuscript, this figure shows a
flow chart outlining a suggested algorithm for the management of
patients with chest pain despite angiographically normal coronary
arteries, in whom the underlying mechanism is coronary microvascular dysfunction. ACS, acute coronary syndrome; CAD, coronary artery disease; CFR, coronary flow reserve; CV,
cardiovascular; ETA, endothelin-type A receptor; IMR, index of
microvascular resistance; IVUS, intravascular ultrasound; MBF,
myocardial blood flow.