This document provides an introduction to the concept of African-centered sociology. It begins by discussing how African-centered scholars use an African worldview framework to analyze African life, history, and culture. It notes that while African-centered approaches have been developed in other fields like psychology and history, an African-centered sociology has yet to be fully articulated. The document then reviews the intellectual history of "Black sociology" from the 1970s onward. It argues that prior attempts at a Black sociology failed to develop autonomous theories and frameworks, and were still influenced by white liberal ideology. The document suggests that for an African-centered sociology to develop, it must be grounded within an African conceptual framework like

1. Critical Sociology
2014, Vol. 40(2) 257­–270
© The Author(s) 2012
Reprints and permissions:
sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav
DOI: 10.1177/0896920512452022
crs.sagepub.com
An Introduction to African-
Centered Sociology: Worldview,
Epistemology, and SocialTheory
Karanja Keita Carroll
State University of NewYork at New Paltz, USA
Abstract
Current advances in Africana (Black) Studies utilize an African-centered conceptual framework
in the study of Africana life, history, and culture. This conceptual framework has been utilized
and expanded on by those developing scholarship in the sub-discipline areas of Africana Studies,
including African-centered psychology, history, and literature. However, to date the articulation
of an African-centered sociology, grounded in an African-centered conceptual framework, has not
developed; neither has it occurred for African-centered sociology as a sub-discipline of Africana
Studies, a sub-discipline of traditional sociology, or as a stand-alone discipline, itself. After a review
of the worldview concept and framework and an analysis of the intellectual history of Black
Sociology, this article then discusses the possibility of an African-centered sociology contingent
upon the usage of an African worldview as the conceptual framework. Finally, the impacts of an
African-centered epistemology and African-centered social theory are considered for the future
of African-centered sociology.
Keywords
African-centered, African-centered conceptual framework, African-centered sociology, African
worldview, Black sociology, social theory, sociology of knowledge
Introduction
This article attempts to provide a basic ‘introduction’ to the possibilities of an African-centered
sociology grounded within the African worldview. By analyzing the worldviews framework as
utilized by African-centered scholars, the first goal of this article is to introduce sociologically-
minded scholars to discussions of worldview that have taken place within other areas of the social
sciences (primarily psychology, economics, political science, and history). Second, this essay sur-
veys the intellectual development of what Robert Staples (1973, 1976) has referred to as ‘Black
Sociology’. In doing so, this survey of the intellectual history of Black Sociology attempts to show
Corresponding author:
Karanja Keita Carroll, Department of Black Studies, State University of NewYork at New Paltz, Faculty Office Building
West 4, New Paltz, NY 12561, USA.
Email: carrollk@newpaltz.edu
452022CRS0010.1177/0896920512452022Critical SociologyCarroll
2012
Article

2. 258 Critical Sociology 40(2)
how and why an African-centered sociology has never developed. Finally, we conclude with an
overview of the impact of the worldview concept and framework on the development of African-
centered sociology by highlighting its impact on epistemological issues and the construction of
social theories.
The worldview concept and framework has been utilized by numerous scholars of African
descent within the social sciences as means of accurately assessing Africana life, history, and cul-
ture (Azibo, 1992, 1999; Carroll, 2008, 2010, 2012; Carruthers, 1984, 1999; Dixon 1971, 1976;
Jones MH, 1972, 1976, 1992; Kambon, 1992, 1996, 1998, 2004; Myers, 1987, 1988, 1991, 2001).
Many of these scholars have taken the lead advanced by economist Vernon Dixon (1971, 1976)
who initially utilized the worldview concept and framework in the analysis of the intersections of
race, culture, and economics. Dixon’s pioneering contributions have been an essential component
to the development of African-centered approaches within Africana (Black) Studies (Azibo, 1992,
1999; Carroll, 2008, 2010, 2012; Myers, 2001). Similarly in the path of Dixon, the political scien-
tist Mack Jones argued that ‘[t]he establishment of academic disciplines . . . is a normative pur-
poseful exercise, the content of which is determined by a people’s worldview and normative
assumptions’ (Jones, 1976: 12). Advances within Africana Studies have taken heed to Jones and
Dixon, and attempt to utilize worldview as an essential component of African-centered analyses in
Africana Studies. Through worldview and culture, social scientists and social theorists within
Africana Studies have two important conceptual tools which immensely contribute to the accurate
interpretation of Africana life, history, and culture.
To date, the articulation of anAfrican-centered sociology grounded within the concept of world-
view has not been engaged by sociologically-minded scholars; neither has it occurred for African-
centered sociology as a sub-discipline of Africana Studies, African-centered sociology as a
sub-discipline of traditional sociology, or for African-centered sociology as a stand-alone disci-
pline itself. This essay attempts to rectify this void by providing a rudimentary ‘introduction’to the
possibilities of African-centered sociology grounded within the African worldview and, by exten-
sion, connected to Africana Studies.
Worldview and Culture as the Methodological Basis of African-
Centered Scholarship1
Current advances in Africana Studies utilize an African-centered conceptual framework in the
study of Africana life, history and culture. African-centered scholars posit that culture and world-
view are two essential tools in the analysis of human and social relations. By doing so, these schol-
ars suggest that the cultural variation which is pervasive throughout all of humanity significantly
impacts the responses one has to social phenomena. African-centered scholars argue that only by
taking into account these varied cultural realities does the social theorist and social scientist truly
engage in meaningful social analysis.
Wade Nobles’s definition of culture has been heavily relied upon in order to shape discussions
within the African-centered scholarship (Azibo, 1992, 1999; Carroll, 2008, 2010, 2012; Grills,
2004; Kambon, 1992, 1996, 1998, 2004; Myers, 1987, 1988, 1991). Culture, as defined by
Nobles, refers to ‘a general design for living and patterns for interpreting reality’ (Nobles, 1985:
102). African-centered scholars have relied upon this understanding of culture to generate a
model of culture based upon two levels. Nobles and others posit that we can understand culture
as it relates to a deep structure and surface structure of culture. From the above definition, the
surface structure correlates with ‘a general design for living’, while the deep structure correlates
with the ‘patterns for interpreting reality’. Together the deep and surface structures of culture

3. Carroll 259
encompass the depth and pervasiveness of culture, especially as it relates to the investigation of
social phenomena.
‘A general design for living’or the surface structure of culture refers to any aspect of one’s lived
reality that is engaged through the five senses. Thus, most aspects that we use to define cultural
differences are reflective of the surface structure. Whether we speak of food, dress, or beauty, each
aspect is accessible through reliance upon what we can see, touch, taste, hear and/or smell. Surface
structure manifestations represent culture at its most simplistic level. While cultural variance at the
surface level is important, it is also important to recognize variance at a deeper level.
The ‘patterns for interpreting reality’ or deep structure of culture, provides a more profound
understanding of culture and refers to the manner in which we engage social and lived phenomena
on a conceptual level. That is, how do we understand that which we engage with the five senses?
This understanding of deep structure is interchangeable with the concept of worldview. Both are
concerned with philosophical questions that are essential in understanding varied experiences
based upon that which is materially apprehensible. Generally speaking, ‘A worldview refers to the
way in which a people make sense of their surroundings; make sense of life and of the universe’
(Ani, 1980: 4). Mack Jones adds clarity to this definition by stating that all ‘people have a world-
view that is a product of [their] lived experience and that constitutes the lens through which the
world of sense perceptions is reduced to described fact’(Jones MH, 1992: 30). As the above defini-
tions suggest, worldview can be understood on multiple levels, from the simplistic ‘how one sees
the world’to a more complex articulation as suggested by Jones. Building upon the work of Vernon
Dixon, African-centered scholars posit that the concept of worldview centers on the role of philo-
sophical assumptions. These philosophical assumptions include cosmology, ontology, axiology,
and epistemology. Together, a cultural group’s understanding of the universe (cosmology), nature
of being (ontology), values (axiology), and knowledge (epistemology) all contribute to the ways in
which a people make sense of reality, i.e. their worldview (Azibo, 1992, 1999; Bell, 1994; Carroll,
2008, 2010, 2012; Grills, 2004; Kambon, 1992, 1996, 1998, 2004; Myers, 1987, 1988, 1991).
Cosmology (cosmos – Greek, universe), ontology (ontos – Greek, being), axiology (axios –
Greek, values), and epistemology (episteme – Greek, knowledge) function as the four core ele-
ments of worldview systems and are essential to African-centered thought (Azibo, 1992; Carroll,
2008; Kambon, 1996, 2004; Myers, 1987, 1991). Distinctions between African and European cos-
mologies are based upon an African cosmogony that rests upon the universe as being intercon-
nected, interrelated and interdependent, and a European cosmogony that assumes an independent
and separate universe (Kambon, 1992, 1996, 1998; Myers, 1987, 1991). Distinctions between
African and European ontologies are based upon an African ontology that posits that the nature of
being/reality is fundamentally spirit with material manifestations, and a European ontology which
suggests that reality is only material (Ani, 1980; Kambon, 1992, 1996, 1998; Myers, 1987, 1991).
Distinctions between African and European axiologies are based upon an African axiology that
places the highest prioritization upon interpersonal relationships among people and the collective
group, and for the European axiology the highest prioritization is on acquisition of objects and
individual gain (Kambon, 1992, 1996, 1998; Myers, 1987, 1991). Epistemological distinctions are
found in relation to the previously mentioned philosophical assumptions, in that an African episte-
mology argues that knowledge can be acquired beyond the five senses (thus a direct outgrowth of
an African ontology), and a European epistemology posits that knowledge only comes from what
you can apprehend within the five senses (thus a direct outgrowth of the European ontology) (Bell,
1994; Kambon, 1992, 1996, 1998; Myers, 1987, 1991). Together the cultural and worldview dif-
ferences ofAfricans and Europeans leads one to infer that social reality is not only lived differently,
but also understood differently. While the African worldview prioritizes an interconnected and

4. 260 Critical Sociology 40(2)
interrelated reality that relies upon the immaterial aspects of reality to make sense of the lived
experience and favors relations of the whole, the European worldview prioritizes the separation of
social reality, only utilizing that which can be apprehended with the five senses to validate and
provide meaning for that which we engage through our lived experience.
This comparative analysis of components of the African and European worldviews implies
basic distinctions at their fundamental core. As Kobi Kambon argues,
our worldview system determines our definitions, our concepts and our values; whether we consider
events that we experience important, true, good, etc. or whether we attend to them at all. Thus, we make
assumptions about events that we experience based on our ‘predisposed’ values, beliefs and attitudes
toward the nature of things. These values, beliefs and attitudes comprise an organized body of ideas or a
conceptual framework for viewing, defining and experiencing the nature and meaning of events that
constitute our phenomenal reality, and even determine what phenomenal reality will in fact be. (Kambon,
1992: 4)
Thus one’s worldview is essential to one’s very being and the basis of how one comes to know,
make sense of and engage one’s social reality.
The varied discussions by the above social scientists of African descent provide a foundation
from which we can not only understand the importance of the worldview concept and framework,
but, more importantly, can recognize its potential impact upon the investigation of social phenom-
ena. The understanding of an African-centered sociology as an outgrowth of an African-centered
perspective rooted within Africana Studies provides an accurate avenue for this introduction.
However, we first must understand the previous attempts at engaging the intersections of race,
culture, and sociology.
From Black Sociology to an African-Centered Sociology:
An Intellectual History
The ability to shift from a Black Sociology to an African-centered sociology requires an analysis
of the varied attempts by African descended sociologists to develop a workable social analysis of
Africana peoples. This current analysis is concerned with theoretical, philosophical and conceptual
arguments on behalf of sociologists and social theorists of African descent. This review will sug-
gest that due to the inability of these sociologists to ground their work within a culturally-specific
conceptual framework, along with conservative trends within mainstream sociology, the develop-
ment of a Black Sociology has never truly occurred. However, this analysis suggests that the devel-
opment of African-centered sociology is possible only once it is wedded to an African conceptual
framework (i.e. the African worldview).
Attempts at the discussion of an authentic ‘Black Sociology’began in the early 1970s following
the inception of Black Studies, disgust among Black sociologists with the American Sociological
Association, and the continued failure of white and Black sociologically-trained scholars to accu-
rately access the social reality of African descended peoples in America. However, as Young and
Deskins (2001), Semmes (2004), Collins and Makowsky (2005), and Wright and Calhoun (2006),
among others, have argued, the foundation of the call for a ‘Black Sociology’ in the early 1970s
was laid down by an earlier generation of African descended scholar-activists, many of whom
produced scholarship within the discipline of sociology. It is the pre-1970s foundation of Black
Sociology that informed Bracey et al.’s (1971) and Blackwell and Janowitz’s (1974) investigations
of scholarship on the intellectual contributions of early Black sociologists. This same foundation

5. Carroll 261
also contributed to attempts by Staples (1973, 1976) to introduce a ‘Black Sociology’, and Ladner
(1998 [1973]) to call for ‘the death of white sociology’.
Robert Washington and Donald Cunnigen clearly recognize this issue in their 2002 volume,
Confronting the American Dilemma of Race: the Second Generation of Black Sociologists. This
collection of essays developed out of critical discussions and subsequent presentations that took
place at a series ofAssociation of Black Sociologists conferences. For example, Benjamin Bowser’s
(2002) and Jerry Watts’s (2002) dialogue on the role of theory within the second generation of
Black sociologists is emblematic of the lack of a clearly autonomous discussion of theory building
within Black Sociology. As Bowser (2002: 61) argues, early Black sociologists ‘did not simply get
their degrees, begin careers, and then do their work independent of their sponsors and the founda-
tions, which made their sociological careers possible. To put it bluntly, they did the research and
their white sponsors were guardians of what is most important in any science, the theory’. Thus
without the development of theories, methodologies, and culturally-specific conceptual frame-
works, the development of an authentic Black Sociology has been inaccessible.
RobertWashington (2002) adds clarity on the failure in developing an authentic Black Sociology,
when he argues that much of the work produced by sociologically-trained Black people in the early
to mid 1900s was in fact sociology produced by Blacks and not ‘Black Sociology’. According to
Washington, ‘Sociology by [B]lacks developed from an early intellectual marriage between [B]
lack sociologists and liberal white sociologists, with the result that liberal ideology dominated [B]
lack sociological writings. Put somewhat differently, we might say, sociology by [B]lacks emerged
under the hegemony of white liberal ideology’ (2002: 334). The intellectual and sociopolitical
interests of the white scholars who trained the early generations of Black sociologists guided the
‘liberal ideology’ of which Washington speaks. Central among this group of professors and stu-
dents was the relationship between the Chicago School of sociology and the first generation of
scholarly-trained Black sociologists.
At the University of Chicago, Robert Ezra Park and W. Lloyd Warner worked to develop a
school of sociology that would eventually contribute to the intellectual development of Charles
Johnson, E. Franklin Frazier, and future Black sociologists. Washington argues that early in their
careers Johnson, Frazier, and other Black sociologists trained at the University of Chicago by Park
and Warner ‘identified with the liberal ideological perspective, which, in their view, embodied
universally valid ethical and scientific principles of social organization’. Washington further adds
that ‘having internalized a naïve scientific positivism, [these Black sociologists] never questioned
mainstream sociology’s cultural suppositions’ (Washington, 2002: 343). The blind acceptance of
liberal ideology among Black sociologists continued from the early 1900s until the mid-1960s with
the transition of Civil Rights to Black Power within the Black Freedom Movement. However, the
remnants of liberal ideology were conceptually influential and informed the assumptions of many
African descended sociologists as they made their call for a ‘Black Sociology’. Much like superfi-
cial calls for ‘Black Power’ during the 1960s which merely turned into duplications of the current
social order but only in Blackface (Allen, 1990), the development of Black Sociology has been
marred by the inability to develop an authentic culturally-grounded framework to analyze the
social reality of African-descended people.
Examples of the inability to develop a culturally-grounded framework to analyze Africana
social reality began with Robert Staples’s (1973, 1976) initial attempts at introducing the idea of a
‘Black Sociology’. In ‘Race and ideology: an essay in Black sociology’, Staples (1973: 395) sets
out to ‘delineate the components of a theoretical system designed to meet the needs of Black peo-
ple’. The goal of which is to ‘relate the field of sociology to an understanding of the Black condi-
tion which will ultimately be applied in some effective way to the resolution of the oppressed

6. 262 Critical Sociology 40(2)
condition of the masses of Black folk’. However, what one soon finds is an analysis of racism and
its negative impact upon the life chances of African descended people in America. While racism
must have a function within any theoretical system that analyzes people of color living under white
supremacy, Staples seems to suggest that clarity on the historical development, psychological cost,
and social consequences of racism is the basis for a conception of Black Sociology. Staples’s
attempt at developing a conceptual model for Black Sociology thus becomes lost and marred in one
consequence of white supremacy rather than providing a conceptual framework for understanding
white supremacy along with its deadly consequences.
Staples worked further to clarify his notion of ‘Black Sociology’ in Introduction to Black
Sociology (1976). Early on within this text Staples engages the conceptual grounds for a Black
Sociology by distinguishing it from white/traditional sociology. Staples argues that white/traditional
sociology develops from the privileged position of the dominant group and thus, a Black Sociology
must define itself on its own terms. Staples (1976: 11) states ‘Afro-American sociology is an
applied science because it has as its primary objective the application of sociological knowledge to
the development of the Black community’. Staples then follows with the major conceptual compo-
nents of his Black Sociology. The Colonial, Marxist, and Pan-Africanist Models all inform Staples’s
conception of Black Sociology. While Staples suggests that notions of African continuities and
cultural relativism will work within his conceptual framework, they seem rather nonexistent as he
develops the conceptual contours of his thesis. Thus Staples is still left without a truly authentic
conceptual framework that is grounded within the lives of African descended peoples.
Joyce Ladner’s influential anthology The Death of White Sociology, originally published in
1973, included numerous essays that suggested a genuine Black social science was on the verge of
developing (Jones RS, 1992). Work by Alkalimat (1998), Staples (1998), and Walters (1998) all
added elements to the possibility of this new Black social science. While stronger than initial
claims made by Staples, these attempts still lacked clarity on a conceptual foundation that is
grounded in Africana life, history, and culture, and cuts across space and time. For example, in
Staples’s ‘What is Black Sociology? Toward a Sociology of Black Liberation’, he contrasts the
differences between white sociology and Black Sociology. However, the theoretical and concep-
tual grounds in which he places Black Sociology are still wedded to white sociology. Thus Staples
argues that Black Sociology relies upon historical analysis as understood through general sociol-
ogy (Staples, 1998: 168). However, Staples goes on to argue that ‘much of the theoretical frame-
work in Black Sociology’ comes from the work of C. Wright Mills and Karl Mannheim (p. 169).
This must be understood in relation to Staples’s previous argument that the Colonial and Marxist
models inform the conceptual framework of his conception of Black Sociology. As Bowser (2002)
and Washington (2002) have argued, the inability of Black Sociology to develop its own theoretical
foundations separate from traditional sociology only makes the field conceptually contingent upon
traditional sociology and, to some, merely an afterthought or an addendum to traditional
sociology.
Yet, while Alkalimat (1998), Hare (1974), Jackson (1974), Staples (1973, 1976, 1998), and oth-
ers were working hard to develop an authentic Black Sociology, there was another group of sociolo-
gists who were so engrossed with liberal ideology that to suggest the possibility of a race or
culture-based model of social scientific analysis was utterly foolish and ethnocentric. McKee (1993)
correctly connects this trend of scholarship with the inability of traditional sociology to develop a
perspective that truly acknowledges the centrality of race in social analysis. Two prime examples are
William Julius Wilson (1974) and Wilson Record (1974, 1975). Both Wilson and Record questioned
the validity of the work of Staples and others who attempted to advance Black Sociology. Wilson’s
conservative stance on the ‘insider/outsider controversy’and Record’s ideological detachment from

7. Carroll 263
liberatory knowledge both work as sociologically conservative counter-attacks upon the thought of
an authentic and culturally-specific sociology among people of African descent.
More recently, the work of Clovis Semmes has attempted to include an African-centered per-
spective within Black Sociology. Semmes’s (2004: 3) ‘Existential sociology or the sociology of
group survival, elevation, and liberation’ provides a context for understanding the ‘call for a [B]
lack Sociology’ and why ‘[B]lack sociology has not realized its potential’. Still, all the while
Margaret Hunter (2004) asks ‘is White sociology really dead?’ and Vernon Williams (2011)
inquires, ‘Was there a distinct “African American Sociology”?’ Additionally, Ray Von Robertson
(2011: 103–104) suggests the reality of an African-centered sociology yet argues that it is concep-
tually underdeveloped. Though Semmes, Von Robertson, and others withinAfrican-centered social
work (Graham, 1999; Schiele, 1994, 1999) provide elements for the development of African-
centered sociology, its evolution still has not taken place for the same reasons that marred its
development in the 1970s. This author posits that the inability to develop a clear conception of
Black Sociology and lay the foundation for an African-centered sociology was negatively influ-
enced by two factors: first, the inability to coalesce around a common conceptual framework, and
second, the role of conservative trends among current and future generations of sociologists of
African descent. If Mack Jones is correct in arguing that ‘[a]cademic discipline[s], especially social
science disciplines, are developed within the constraints of worldviews’ (Jones MH, 1992: 30),
then it is imperative for African-centered sociology through Africana Studies to develop on its own
conceptual ground. This is only done through an engagement with conceptually grounded argu-
ments that are rooted within worldview systems.
African-Centered Sociology and the Implications of the African
Worldview
As previously discussed, a worldview consists of a cosmology, ontology, axiology, epistemology,
and other philosophical assumptions. Together, a cultural group’s understanding of the universe
(cosmology), nature of being (ontology), values (axiology), and knowledge (epistemology) all
contribute to the ways in which a people make sense of reality, i.e. their worldview (Azibo, 1992,
1999; Bell, 1994; Carroll, 2008, 2010, 2012; Grills, 2004; Kambon, 1992, 1996, 1998, 2004;
Myers, 1987, 1988, 1991). As these components relate to the investigation of social phenomena, it
is incumbent upon African-centered sociologists and social theorists to develop theories, concepts,
and models and produce research that is within the cultural parameters reflective of African
descended people (i.e. the African worldview). Thus the African worldview provides necessary
grounding for work that can be produced by sociologists generating scholarship within African-
centered sociology.
As previously expounded upon, the worldview framework provides a basic set of inquiry for the
African-centered researcher (Carroll, 2008). Developing out of an African cosmology, ontology,
axiology, and epistemology, the African-centered sociologist must bring to his/her research on
Africana social phenomena these preliminary questions of inquiry:
• Developing out of an African cosmology, how does this research project reflect the interde-
pendent and interconnected nature of the universe?
• Developing out of an African ontology, how does this research project reflect the spiritual
and material nature of reality?
• Developing out of an African axiology, how does this research project reflect the communal
nature of African-descended people?

8. 264 Critical Sociology 40(2)
• Developing out of an African epistemology, how does this research project engage the
immaterial nature of reality? (Carroll, 2008)
Through the engagement of these basic questions, the African-centered sociologist has the
potential to develop theory and research that generates out of the philosophical assumptions of
the African worldview. More importantly, it is also incumbent upon African-centered sociolo-
gists to critically engage the central role of epistemology in the advancement of theory and
research.
African-Centered Sociology: Some Epistemological
Considerations
Essential to the development of concepts, theories, and models within African-centered sociology
is the serious engagement of the role of epistemology and its impact upon data acquisition and, by
extension, knowledge production. The normative epistemological assumptions generating out of
the European worldview suggest that the only means of acquiring data and knowledge is through
the five senses. These approaches to data acquisition among African-centered sociologists can only
go but so far and there are alternative mechanisms for acquiring data and knowledge. Thus the
utilization of an African epistemology within African-centered sociology will manifest itself
through a variety of approaches. First, by relying upon the intuitive self, African-centered sociolo-
gists and social theorists can utilize metaphysical approaches to data acquisition that come from
nuanced processes of re-membering (Bynum, 1999). These processes consist of recognizing that
the fundamental basis of all knowledge is self-knowledge (Myers, 1987, 1988, 1991, 2001) and the
usage of historical, epic, and cultural memory (Bynum, 1999) provides alternative avenues to
acquire information about the self and by extension Africana people. If these alternative avenues
prove fruitful they can then inform explanations of social phenomena that are reflective ofAfricana
reality. Reliance upon self-knowledge and cultural memory comes through keeping one’s self on
an African continuum of time and space, looking for and utilizing the cultural connections that
unite the Africana experience, and attempting to situate the deeper meaning of life experiences
beyond a one-dimensional experiential reality. Since all things within the universe are intercon-
nected and interrelated, the current experiences of Africana people are directly related to the his-
torical experience of Africana people across space and time.
Second, African-centered sociology must critically investigate what are usable experiences that
can inform research and the interpretation of data. For example, what we consider to be dream/
awake states of consciousness can be considered a false dichotomous binary in which what we
believe to be a dreaming state is in fact an awake state, and vice versa (Bynum, 1999). By utilizing
information and experiences gained through various states of consciousness, we can develop alter-
native parameters that inform explanations of social phenomena. The ability to reach into these
varied states of consciousness and utilize this information will require that alternative methods of
inquiry function just as much as normative ways of knowing, with equal validity and fallibility. As
Cheryl Grills (2004) has articulated, African people have recognized the epistemological implica-
tions of varied forms of consciousness and this has impacted on how ancient and traditional
Africans have engaged the world. These ways of knowing that go beyond our current physical real-
ity have a functional role for Africans in the diaspora, as they did for the Ancient Egyptians, the
Yoruba, and the Dogon. Thus as a means of continuity, Africana social scientists must work to
develop similar methods of data acquisition because these are also accurate means for investigating
Africana life, history, and culture.

9. Carroll 265
In addition, the usage of mixed method approaches relying upon quantitative and qualitative
methods should also be utilized, developed, and expanded upon within African-centered sociology.
While mixed methods approaches are already utilized within certain areas of Africana Studies
(McDougal, 2011), African-centered sociology should exhaust their usage as they relate to accu-
rately understanding Africana life, history, and culture. Fourth, we must fully exhaust the teleologi-
cal assumption generating out of the African worldview (Carroll, 2008). Thus building on the initial
inquiries of W. Curtis Banks (1992), an African-centered sociology should generate purpose-driven
research that is ultimately prescriptive and not merely descriptive. The ability for research conclu-
sions to be prescriptive speaks to the solution-driven nature ofAfricana Studies andAfrican-centered
sociology, and not merely the ability to highlight problems within the Africana world.
Finally, data acquisition and knowledge production within African-centered sociology should
require active membership with phenomena under investigation. No longer can the sociologically-
minded researcher be detached from that which s/he is investigating; we must be active partici-
pants who knowingly and willingly divulge our role as interested scholars, committed to the
development of liberatory knowledge (Curry, 2011). The previously discussed epistemological
considerations informed by the African worldview are the initial steps in an attempt to develop the
conceptual parameters of an African-centered sociology. The future of African-centered sociology
is contingent upon further expansion of these and similar ideas that are grounded within the philo-
sophical assumptions of the African worldview.
African-Centered Sociology and SocialTheory
Building on the previously discussed epistemological considerations is the important role that
social theory must play within African-centered sociology. By the development of workable social
theories for Africana people, African-centered sociology not only provides descriptive explana-
tions for the conditions of African descended people, but also offers prescriptive explanations with
solutions to alleviate the negative conditions that govern the social reality of Africana people.
Arguably much of the work in Black Sociology from the 1970s and onward engaged the impor-
tance of developing explanations and analysis of the social reality of African descended people,
along with some arguments for the need for workable social theories for people of African descent
(Alkalimat, 1998). The inability of the early attempts at a Black Sociology to develop social theo-
ries grounded in a set of normative philosophical assumptions reflective of African people across
space and time has limited the current feasibility of such theoretical developments. However, given
the advances within African-centered knowledge production, discussions of normative philosophi-
cal assumptions can be the basis from which we discuss the function of social theory within
African-centered sociology.
Prior to discussions of Black Sociology in the early 1970s, Africana thinkers provided a number
of approaches to social theory. All of these attempts assumed that social theorists work to commit
their mental energy to the alleviation of the social issues that impact their communities. The experi-
ences of African people in America has contributed to the development and nurturing of numerous
social theorists who have been committed to the transformation of Africana life and social reality.
As early as the 1800s, African descendants in America were developing social theories that func-
tioned as descriptions and prescriptions for the social conditions of African people under white
supremacy. Martin Delaney, Henry Highland Garnett, Maria Stewart, John Lewis, Mary Ann
Shadd, J. Theodore Holly, Alexander Crummell, and T. Morris Chester, among others, all worked
to use their mental prowess to alleviate the conditions of African descended people within the
African world, and the United States in particular (Newman et al., 2001). For example, on 9

10. 266 Critical Sociology 40(2)
December 1862 T. Morris Chester delivered a powerful address at the 29th anniversary of the
Philadelphia Library Company. In this lecture Morris focused upon the ability of African descen-
dants to reach their highest potential only through knowledge of Black history and culture, in addi-
tion to the cultivation of self-respect, self-love, and racial pride. Morris stated that,
It cannot be denied that we need a higher cultivation of self-respect and pride of race. Public sentiment and
legislation have been sufficiently ungodly to somewhat distract the councils of Afro-Americans – to
suppress every [hu]manly attribute, and cast doubts upon the superiority of our people. These influences
have been so unfortunate that they have prevented a thorough union of feeling and sympathy among all
classes. (Newman et al., 2001: 307)
Chester was concerned with the elevation of the moral and ethical character of African descendants
in America and believed that this could only be done for African people themselves. By focusing
upon the importance of history and culture, Chester further argued that ‘histories and geographies,
adapted to the use of your schools, written by one of you, with a view to inspire and cheer the
youths in their difficult ascent up the hill of knowledge, are much needed’ (Newman et al., 2001:
309). Thus through knowledge of Black history and culture, and through the cultivation of self-
respect, self-love, and racial pride, Chester worked to develop a descriptive and prescriptive social
analysis for African descendants in the late 1800s.
More recently, social science-trained scholar-activists have also provided useful discussions on
the role and function of social theory. Both Bobby Wright (1984) and Daudi Ajani ya Azibo (1992,
1999, 2007) discuss the importance of social theory as it relates to the survival and future of
African descended people. Azibo (1999: 1) argues that a social theory refers to ‘those principles
that determine the relationship of a people to one another (i.e., to collective “self”), to other humans
(i.e., who are other than “self”), and to nature. Social theory, then, establishes a people’s guidelines
of life including their values, rituals and ways of dealing with “the other”’. As Azibo suggests, the
basis of social theory for Africana peoples must be grounded in the unique way in which we under-
stand the world around us and our place within it.
African-centered sociology has the potential to produce the strongest social theories once it is
wedded to a conceptual framework that is rooted in the current and historical social realities of
Africana people across space and time. This can be found in a cultural group’s understanding of the
universe (cosmology), nature of being (ontology), values (axiology), and knowledge (epistemol-
ogy), and all contributing to the ways in which a people make sense of reality, i.e. their worldview
(Azibo, 1992, 1999; Bell, 1994; Carroll, 2008, 2010, 2012; Grills, 2004; Kambon, 1992, 1996,
1998, 2004; Myers, 1987, 1988, 1991). African-centered social theories grounded within the
African worldview become the solution to accurate and authentic descriptions and prescriptions of
Africana social reality. Grounding African-centered sociology and Africana social theories within
the African worldview will solve the conceptual problems that have marred the work of Staples
(1973, 1976, 1998), and it will also allow for the development of theory and methodology on
Africana cultural grounds as suggested by Bowser (2002) and Washington (2002).
Conclusion
This article has attempted to introduce sociologically-minded scholars to the role and function of
the worldview concept and framework within African-centered research and scholarship. Building
upon this foundation, a critical review of the intellectual history of Black Sociology has allowed
for the elucidation of the weaknesses within the historical development of Black Sociology due to

11. Carroll 267
the inability of its earliest practitioners and theoreticians to develop an authentic conceptual frame-
work for Africana social analysis. However, by placing the subject matter of Black Sociology in
dialogue with African-centered scholarship, the possibility of an African-centered sociology has
been articulated. Essential to the development of an African-centered sociology is usage of the
African worldview as the conceptual framework, thus allowing for the advancement of African-
centered epistemological modes of inquiry and a focus on the development of African-centered
social theories.
As Mack Jones, Vernon Dixon, and others have argued, worldviews are essential components in
the development of academic disciplines. The inability of Black Sociology to develop in relation
to an African worldview has only hindered its development into an African-centered sociology.
Today, given the advances in African-centered knowledge production, it is only logical that an
African-centered sociology develop from a foundation within an African worldview. It is only
through utilization of the worldview assumptions ofAfricana peoples that a truly authenticAfrican-
centered sociology will come into existence. This development of an African-centered social anal-
ysis is connected to other advances throughout the various sub-discipline components of Africana
Studies. The advances in African-centered psychology, history, and literature all allow for more
than merely blackenizing traditional disciplines (Akbar, 1984; Baldwin, 1992). All, in fact, call for
new conceptual frameworks that can be applied to accurately analyzing Africana life, history, and
culture.The implications of the above analysis have impact for bothAfricana Studies and Sociology,
especially for courses such as ‘Black Sociology’, ‘Race, Culture and Sociology’, and ‘Race and the
Sociology of Knowledge’, among others. Furthermore, the above analysis adds to the essential
project of advancing African-centered analyses within Africana Studies.
Acknowledgements
This article is dedicated to the memory of Vernon Dixon (1934–2011), pioneering scholar of the worldview
methodology and framework. Medasi to Danielle Wallace, Sekhmet Ra Em Kht Maat, Geneva Moore, DeReef
Jamison and Leslie Wilson for their support and critical feedback.
Note
1. See previous discussions of the worldview framework and methodology as discussed in Carroll (2008,
2010, 2012).
References
Akbar N (1984) Africentric social science for human liberation. Journal of Black Psychology 14(4): 395–414.
Alkalimat A (1998) The ideology of a Black social science. In: Ladner J (ed.) The Death of White Sociology:
Essays on Race and Culture. Baltimore, MD: Black Classic Press, 173–189.
Allen R (1990) Black Awakening in Capitalist America. Trenton, NJ: Africa World Press.
Ani M (1980) Let the Circle Be Unbroken. New York, NY: Nkonimfo.
Azibo DA (1992) Articulating the distinction between Black Studies and the study of Blacks: the fundamental
role of culture and the African-centered worldview. Afrocentric Scholar 1(1): 64–97.
Azibo DA (1999) Africentric conceptualizing as the pathway to African liberation. International Journal of
Africana Studies 5: 1–31.
Azibo DA (2007) Personal communication.
Baldwin JA (1992) The role of Black psychologists in Black liberation. In: Burlew AKH et al. (eds) African
American Psychology: Theory, Research and Practice. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 48–57.
Banks WC (1992) The theoretical and methodological crisis of the Africentric conception. Journal of Negro
Education 61(3): 262–272.

12. 268 Critical Sociology 40(2)
Bell YR (1994) A culturally-sensitive analysis of Black learning styles. Journal of Black Psychology 20(1):
47–61.
Blackwell JE and Janowitz M (eds) (1974) Black Sociologists: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives.
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Bowser BP (2002) Classical Black sociologists and social theory: anatomy of a controversy. In: Washington RE
and Cunnigen D (eds) Confronting the Dilemma of Race: the Second Generation of Black Sociologists.
Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 49–70.
Bracey JH, Meier A, and Rudwick E (eds) (1971) The Black Sociologists: the First Half Century. Belmont,
CA: Wadsworth.
Bynum EB (1999) The African Unconscious: Roots of Ancient Mysticism and Modern Psychology. New York,
NY: Teachers College Press.
Carroll KK (2008) Africana Studies and research methodology: revisiting the centrality of the Afrikan world-
view in Africana Studies research and scholarship. Journal of Pan African Studies 2(2): 4–27.
Carroll KK (2010) A genealogical review of the worldview framework in African-centered psychology.
Journal of Pan African Studies 3(8): 109–134.
Carroll KK (2012) A genealogical review of the worldview concept and framework in Africana Studies
related theory and research. In: Conyers JL, Jr (ed.) African American Consciousness: Past and Present.
New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction, 23–46.
Carruthers J (1984) Essays in Ancient Egyptian Studies. Los Angeles, CA: University of Sankore Press.
Carruthers J (1999) Intellectual Warfare. Chicago, IL: Third World.
Collins R and Makowsky M (2005) The Discovery of Society. Montreal, CA: McGraw-Hill.
Curry TJ (2011) The derelictical crisis of African American philosophy: how African American phi-
losophy fails to contribute to the study of African-descended people. Journal of Black Studies 42(3):
314–333.
Dixon VJ (1971) African-oriented and Euro-American-oriented worldviews: research methodologies and
economics. Review of Black Political Economy 7(2): 119–156.
Dixon VJ (1976) Worldviews and research methodology. In: King L (ed.) African Philosophy: Assumption
and Paradigms for Research on Black Persons. Los Angeles, CA: Fanon R & D Center, 51–102.
Graham M (1999) The African-centered worldview: developing a paradigm for social work. Journal of Black
Studies 30(1): 103–122.
Grills C (2004) African psychology. In: Jones R (ed.) Black Psychology, 4th edn. Berkeley, CA: Cobb &
Henry, 171–208.
Hare N (1974) The contributions of Black sociologists to Black Studies. In: Blackwell JE and Janowitz M
(eds) Black Sociologists: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago
Press, 253–266.
Hunter M (2004) Rethinking epistemology, methodology, and racism: or, is White sociology really dead?
Race & Society 5: 119–138.
Jackson JJ (1974) Black female sociologists. In: Blackwell JE and Janowitz M (eds) Black Sociologists:
Historical and Contemporary Perspectives. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 267–298.
Jones MH (1972) A frame of reference for Black politics. In: Henderson LJ (ed.) Black Political Life in the
United States. San Francisco, CA: Chandler, 7–20.
Jones MH (1976) Scientific method, value judgments, and the Black predicament in the U.S. Review of Black
Political Economy 7(1): 7–21.
Jones MH (1992) Political science and the Black political experience: issues in epistemology and relevance.
National Political Science Review 3: 25–39.
Jones RS (1992) Beginning in an-other place: oppugnancy and the formation of Black sociology. Griot 1:
15–26.
Kambon K (1992) The African Personality in America: an African-Centered Framework. Tallahassee, FL:
Nubian Nation.
Kambon K (1996) The Africentric paradigm and African-American psychological liberation. In: Azibo DA
(ed.) African Psychology: Historical Perspective and Related Commentary. Trenton, NJ: Africa World
Press, 57–69.

13. Carroll 269
Kambon K (1998) African/Black Psychology in the American Context: an African-Centered Approach.
Tallahassee, FL: Nubian Nation, 1998.
Kambon K (2004) The worldviews paradigm as the conceptual framework for African/Black psychology. In:
Jones R (ed.) Black Psychology, 4th edn. Hampton, VA: Cobb & Henry, 73–92.
Ladner J (ed.) (1998 [1973]) The Death of White Sociology: Essays on Race and Culture. Baltimore, MD:
Black Classic.
McDougal S (2011) The future of research methods in Africana Studies graduate curriculum. Journal of
African American Studies 15(3): 279–289.
McKee J (1993) Sociology and the Race Problem: the Failure of Perspective. Urbana, IL: University of
Illinois Press.
Myers LJ (1987) The deep structure of culture: the relevance of traditional African culture in contemporary
times. Journal of Black Studies 18(1): 72–85.
Myers LJ (1988) Understanding an Afrocentric World View: Introduction to an Optimal Psychology.
Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
Myers LJ (1991) Expanding the psychology of knowledge optimally: the importance of world view revisited.
In: Jones R (ed.) Black Psychology, 3rd edn. Berkeley, CA: Cobb & Henry, 15–32.
Myers LJ (2001) Optimal theory and the philosophical and academic origins of Black Studies. In: Norment N
(ed.) The African American Studies Reader. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press, 369–376.
Newman R, Rael R, and Lapsanky P (eds) (2001) Pamphlets of Protest: An Anthology of Early African
American Protest Literature, 1790–1860. New York, NY: Routladge.
Nobles W (1985) Africanity and the Black family. Oakland, CA: Black Family Institute.
Record W (1974) Responses of sociologists to Black Studies. Journal of Higher Education 45(5): 364–391.
Record W (1975) Can Black Studies and sociology find common ground. Journal of Negro Education 44(1):
63–81.
Schiele JH (1994) Afrocentricity as an alternative worldview for equality. Journal of Progressive Human
Services 5(1): 5–25
Schiele JH (1999) E. Franklin Frazier and the interfacing of Black sociology and Black social work. Journal
of Sociology & Social Welfare 26(2): 105–125.
Semmes CE (2004) Existential sociology or the sociology of group survival, elevation, and liberation. Journal
of African American Studies 7(4): 3–18.
Staples R (1973) Race and ideology: an essay in Black Sociology. Journal of Black Studies 3(4): 395–422.
Staples R (1976) Introduction to Black Sociology. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Staples R (1998) What is Black sociology? Toward a sociology of Black liberation. In: Ladner J (ed.) The
Death of White Sociology: Essays on Race and Culture. Baltimore, MD: Black Classic, 161–172.
Von Robertson R (2011) A Pan-Africanist analysis of Black Seminole perceptions of racism, discrimination
and exclusion. Journal of Pan African Studies 4(5): 102–121.
Walters R (1998) Towards a definition of Black social science. In: Ladner J (ed.) The Death of White Sociol-
ogy: Essays on Race and Culture. Baltimore, MD: Black Classic Press, 190–212.
Washington R (2002) Sociology by Blacks versus Black sociology: revisioning Black social reality. In:
Washington RE and Cunnigen D (eds) Confronting the Dilemma of Race: the Second Generation of Black
Sociologists. Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 331–371.
Washington RE and Cunnigen D (eds) (2002) Confronting the Dilemma of Race: the Second Generation of
Black Sociologists. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
Watts J (2002) On reconsidering Park, Johnson, DuBois, Frazier and Reid: reply to Benjamin Bowser’s: the
contribution of Blacks to the sociology of knowledge. In: Washington RE and Cunnigen D (eds) Con-
fronting the Dilemma of Race: The Second Generation of Black Sociologists. Lanham, MD: University
Press of America, 21–48.
Williams VJ (2011) Was there a distinct ‘African American Sociology’? Western Journal of Black Studies
35(1): 39–43.
Wilson W (1974) The new Black sociology: reflections on the ‘Insiders and Outsiders’ controversy. In:
Blackwell JE and Janowitz M (eds) Black Sociologists: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives. Chi-
cago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 327–340.

14. 270 Critical Sociology 40(2)
Wright B (1984) The Psychopathic Racial Personality and Other Essays. Chicago, IL: Third World.
Wright I and Calhoun TC (2006) Jim Crow sociology: toward an understanding of the origin and principles of
Black sociology via the Atlanta sociological laboratory. Sociological Focus 39(1): 1–18.
Young AA and Deskins DR (2001) Early traditions of African-American sociological thought. Annual Review
of Sociology 27: 445–477.