2. The first article on the Military Tattoo policy is an
informative piece. It appears to have no bias
towards having tattoos or not having tattoos.
3. It talks about how tattoos are prohibited on the
neck, face, hands, and below the wrists. The article
states how these changes are making enlisting in the
Army more difficult. These new set of rules are said
to make our soldiers look more professional.
4. In an USA Today article, they talk about how after the
Military first announced the new tattoo policy, that they
may be leaning to ease up on some of the rules.
5. The second article seems to support the
topic that is being discussed, which is the
ease of the tattoo policy.
6. The first article makes valid points on why this policy
may be needed, but just because someone chooses
to have tattoos on their body, it doesn’t affect their
ability to be a great soldier and leader.
7. Why are our leading Military Official concerned
more on appearance and less on performance?