Grossing up operating_expenses-_a_reasonable_concept_that_gets__lost_in_translation_10-08
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Like this? Share it with your network

Share

Grossing up operating_expenses-_a_reasonable_concept_that_gets__lost_in_translation_10-08

  • 1,818 views
Uploaded on

 

More in: Business , Technology
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
    Be the first to like this
No Downloads

Views

Total Views
1,818
On Slideshare
1,226
From Embeds
592
Number of Embeds
4

Actions

Shares
Downloads
0
Comments
0
Likes
0

Embeds 592

http://officesearchtoronto.com 587
http://feeds.feedburner.com 3
http://cc.bingj.com 1
https://www.google.ca 1

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
    No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. -ssorG sesnepxE gnitarepO ”pU gni noitalsnart ni tsol steg taht tpecnoc elbanosaer a Lease Audit ExtraFALL 2008 “Grossing Up” Operating Expenses a reasonable concept that gets lost in translation In the operating expense provisions of an office For example, occupancy has no bearing on labour lease you may come across wording that allows or utilities for the lobby, elevators, outside areas, the landlord to “gross up operating costs which or other common areas. Even vacant leaseable vary with the use and occupancy of the rentable premises require a minimum of heat in the premises in the Centre as if the property were winter. 97% occupied and operational.” A Colliers audit on a 7,000 s.f. office space in These costs are generally cleaning, waste Ottawa netted a $32,000 recovery for our client. removal, utilities and management fees if The landlord had applied gross up calculations based on a % of operating costs. Leases allow to the utilities on vacant space. However, they these costs to be grossed up to a range of 95% had continued to cool, heat and light the vacant to 100% occupancy. premises as though they were fully occupied in order to make the marketing and showing of the On the surface, allowing the landlord to space more appealing. charge for more expense than they incur seems absurd. However, the concept is fair to the Finally, vacant space rarely remains so for a full landlord – yes, you read that right – and fair year and appropriate calculations are required to to the tenant. ensure the gross up is applied only to the time the space was vacant. An extreme example to illustrate the point: Assume there are two tenants in a 100,000 sq. ft. office building, REMEDY Tenant A and Tenant B, who occupy 50% of the space each. Have the ‘right to audit’ written into the lease agreement in The cleaning costs are $1 per sq. ft. per annum, or $100,000. order to ensure that the grossing up is done correctly. Clear, Cleaning contracts allow vacancy credits to be given to the concise lease language such as the following is also essential: landlord if tenant(s) vacate the premises. “The landlord is entitled to gross up those items of operating Now let’s say Tenant B vacates the premises for a full year, costs which vary with the use and occupancy of the rentable reducing cleaning costs to $50,000. Without a gross up, Tenant A would now pay 50% of $50,000, equalling $25,000, even premises in the Centre as if the Centre were (% rate to be though they are responsible for 100% of the cost. The landlord negotiated) occupied and operational. For greater certainty the would be out of pocket $25,000. Grossing up the cleaning variable costs are cleaning and utilities. In no event shall the expense to 100% allows the landlord to recover all of its costs. tenant’s proportionate share of the variable expenses be greater that would be payable if the property had been fully rented.” Lost in translation Where this concept often breaks down is in the calculations For Additional Information Contact: used by landlord administrative staff. We have seen situations Frank Iannarilli where incorrect calculations have resulted in tenants paying Director, Lease Audit more on those variable expense items than if the Centre were 100% occupied. 416.620-2876 frank.iannarilli@colliers.com