Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
0
The Shifting Paradigm of Public Relations
The Shifting Paradigm of Public Relations
The Shifting Paradigm of Public Relations
The Shifting Paradigm of Public Relations
The Shifting Paradigm of Public Relations
The Shifting Paradigm of Public Relations
The Shifting Paradigm of Public Relations
The Shifting Paradigm of Public Relations
The Shifting Paradigm of Public Relations
The Shifting Paradigm of Public Relations
The Shifting Paradigm of Public Relations
The Shifting Paradigm of Public Relations
The Shifting Paradigm of Public Relations
The Shifting Paradigm of Public Relations
The Shifting Paradigm of Public Relations
The Shifting Paradigm of Public Relations
The Shifting Paradigm of Public Relations
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

The Shifting Paradigm of Public Relations

3,956

Published on

Published in: Technology, Business
0 Comments
2 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
3,956
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
184
Comments
0
Likes
2
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. James E. Grunig, Professor Emeritus Department of Communication University of Maryland College Park, Maryland, USA
  • 2. <ul><li>As of June 30, 2009, there were 1,668,870,408 internet users in the world—24.7% of the population. ( http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm , accessed Sept. 4, 2009) </li></ul><ul><li>There were 704,213,930 users in Asia—18.5% of the Asian population and 42.2% of the users in the world. </li></ul><ul><li>Internet use in the world grew 362.2% from 2000 to 2009, 516.1% in Asia. </li></ul><ul><li>On December 31, 2008, there were 298 million internet users in China, 22% of the population, with an annual growth rate of 41.9%). ( China Internet Network Information Center, The 23 rd Statistical Survey Report on the Internet Development in China , January 2009) </li></ul><ul><li>China has more internet users than any country in the world, surpassing the USA in 2008. (CNN.com, January 14, 2009) </li></ul>
  • 3. <ul><li>51% are responsible for digital communications. </li></ul><ul><li>49% for blogging. </li></ul><ul><li>48% for social networking. </li></ul><ul><li>52% for microblogging (such as text messaging, instant messaging, and Twittering). </li></ul><ul><li>(iPressroom, Tendstream, PRSA, and Korn/Ferry </li></ul><ul><li>International, 2009 Digital Readiness Report), </li></ul><ul><li>as reported in PR News [prnewsonline.com], August 17, 2009) </li></ul>
  • 4. <ul><li>Messages received by publics can be controlled by public relations practitioners. </li></ul><ul><li>Publics can be created and “targeted.” </li></ul><ul><li>Publics can be persuaded—i.e., their cognitions, attitudes, and behaviors can be controlled through asymmetrical communication. </li></ul><ul><li>Images, reputations, brands, impressions or similar names used to describe cognitive representations can be “managed.” </li></ul>
  • 5. <ul><li>Members of publics have always controlled the messages to which they are exposed. </li></ul><ul><li>Publics create themselves around problems their members face in life situations—stakeholders define their stakes in organizations. </li></ul><ul><li>Two-way symmetrical communication is more effective than asymmetrical communication in building organization-public relationships . </li></ul><ul><li>Reputations, images, and similar concepts are what members of different publics think and say to each other, not something controlled by an organization. </li></ul><ul><li>These cognitive representations are a by-product of organizational decisions and behaviors, active communication with publics, and the quality of organization-relationships. </li></ul>
  • 6. <ul><li>Members of publics are less constrained by the information traditional media choose to make available. </li></ul><ul><li>New media make it possible for members of publics, and journalists, to seek information from many sources, anywhere in the world. </li></ul><ul><li>Members of publics can interact with each other, and publics can interact with organizations and other publics whenever they want. </li></ul><ul><li>Through publics relations, organizations can join the conversations within and among publics. </li></ul><ul><li>These conversations may, or may not, include journalists online and in the traditional media. </li></ul>
  • 7. <ul><li>Communicators typically use a new medium in the same way they used existing media. </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Television showed broadcasters reading the same stories they read on radio. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Public relations practitioners first used the internet as an information dump, in the same way they produced publications (Web 1.0 rather than 2.0). </li></ul></ul><ul><li>New media can be used for all four models of public relations: press agentry, public information, two-way asymmetrical, and two-way symmetrical. </li></ul>
  • 8.  
  • 9. <ul><li>A messaging, publicity, informational, media-relations function? </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Publications, news, communication campaigns, media contacts. </li></ul></ul><ul><li>A marketing function? </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Support for marketing through media publicity? </li></ul></ul><ul><li>A strategic management function? </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Active participant in decision making? </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Research-based, organizational listening and learning? </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Building relationships for other functions, including marketing? </li></ul></ul>
  • 10. <ul><li>The symbolic, interpretive, paradigm vs. the behavioral, strategic management, paradigm. </li></ul><ul><li>Both paradigms existed in the history of public relations, are practiced today, and are competing for the future of the profession. </li></ul><ul><li>Public relations cannot take full advantage of the digital revolution if it is practiced under the interpretive rather than the strategic management paradigm. </li></ul>
  • 11. <ul><li>Public relations manages how publics interpret the organization—to buffer the organization from its environment. </li></ul><ul><li>These interpretations include popular concepts such as image, identity, impressions, reputation, and brand. </li></ul><ul><li>Emphasis is on publicity, media relations, and media effects. </li></ul><ul><li>Views the effects of public relations as changes in cognitive representations, as the negotiation of meaning. </li></ul>
  • 12. <ul><li>Public relations participates in strategic decision-making to help manage the behavior of the organization. </li></ul><ul><li>Public relations is a bridging activity to build relationships with stakeholders rather than a set of messaging activities designed to buffer the organization from stakeholders. </li></ul><ul><li>Emphasis is on two-way and symmetrical communication of many kinds to provide publics a voice in management decisions and to facilitate dialogue between management and publics. </li></ul><ul><li>Views effects as changes in behavior, as the negotiation of behavior. </li></ul>
  • 13. <ul><li>Excellent public relations is </li></ul><ul><li>Managerial. </li></ul><ul><li>Strategic. </li></ul><ul><li>Integrated but not sublimated to other management functions. </li></ul><ul><li>Symmetrical. </li></ul><ul><li>Diverse. </li></ul><ul><li>Ethical. </li></ul><ul><li>Global. </li></ul>
  • 14. Organizational Reputation Management Decisions Communication Programs ( Relationship Cultivation Strategies) Issues Achievement of Organizational Goals Crises Relationship Outcomes Consequences Consequences Behavior of Publics Creates Model of Strategic Management of Public Relations: New Media Can Be Used at Each Stage of the Model Stakeholders Publics P1 Pi P2 No Consequences
  • 15. <ul><li>Environmental scanning and rumor control. </li></ul><ul><li>Segmentation of stakeholders and publics based on problems, issues, values, concepts, and ideologies. </li></ul><ul><li>Anticipating and dealing with issues and crises. </li></ul><ul><li>Identifying and evaluating the type and quality of relationships with and among publics. </li></ul><ul><li>Measuring reputation (“Reputation and brand increasingly depend on what comes up when you are Googled,” David Phillips and Phillip Young, Online Public Relations, 2009). </li></ul><ul><li>Implementing communication programs—e.g., employee relations and media relations. </li></ul><ul><li>Formative and evaluative research for communication programs. </li></ul>
  • 16. <ul><li>The decisions, behaviors, and actions of an organization are transparent to internet users anywhere in the world: Corporate social responsibility is no longer a choice. </li></ul><ul><li>When an organization participates in conversations with publics, ethically it must disclose its name and interests. </li></ul><ul><ul><li>For example, fake blogs (flogs or flack blogs) and other camouflaged participation in the dialogue are unethical. </li></ul></ul>
  • 17. <ul><li>Shifting the public relations paradigm from a symbolic interpretive approach to a strategic, behavioral approach is crucial in a global, digital world. </li></ul><ul><ul><li>For organizations to be effective. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>To cultivate relationships in societies and globally. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>To reduce conflict. </li></ul></ul><ul><li>The digital media provide new tools for public relations that facilitate this paradigm shift. </li></ul>

×