3. Outline
Rationale for this work
Added-value of the paper
OECD Principles on Water Governance
Example of the checklist on the scale principle
Next steps
Questions for discussion
4. Rationale for this work
Supporting the implementation of the
principles by:
Providing detailed guidance for specific subsectors
Taking a closer look at stakeholders’ roles as shared
responsibilities
Supporting the discussion on indicators
Collecting good practices on flood risk governance
5. Added-value of the paper
A contextualisation of the principles for flood risk
governance
A checklist to assess whether conditions are in
place to manage risks rather than to manage crisis
Concrete examples and good practices
5 stages of flood risk management:
Anticipation Prevention/Mitigation Preparation
Response Recovery
6. OECD Principles on Water Governance
TRUST &
ENGAGEMENT
Clear
roles &
responsibilities
Capacity
Policy
coherence
Appropriate
scales within
basin systems
Regulatory
Frameworks
Data &
information
Financing
Innovative
governance
Trade-offs
across users,
rural and urban
areas, and
generations
Integrity &
Transparency
Monitoring
& Evaluation
Stakeholder
engagement
WATER
GOVERNANCE
8. SEP: Collect case studies at different scales:
• “Ticking boxes” in the checklist
• Providing a short paragraph introducing the case
• Peer-reviewing the comparative analysis
NOV: Working paper
DEC: Scientific contribution
Our ambition = Apply the principles to other sub-sectors
(droughts, groundwater)
Next steps
10. • Do you think the methodology and the checklist
are robust enough to proceed with case studies’
collection?
• How can we enlarge the geographical scope of the
paper ?
• Is the checklist relevant for all scales of
governance?
• How to foster bench learning through case
studies?
• How can this exercise foster greater integration
between water, spatial planning and other policy
areas?
Questions for discussion