SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 9
Download to read offline
Posted by http://MillCityTimes.com




                                     Resolution 2011-209

    Resolution to Identify the Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board as a Partner with the
     Downtown Improvement District and to provide $25,000 toward hiring a Consultant
        to Conduct a Study to Determine the Feasibility and Approach for Creating a
                      Downtown Minneapolis Public Realm Conservancy


Whereas, In order to make downtown Minneapolis a more attractive and welcoming
environment for its growing residential population and workforce, business and community
leaders are defining various initiatives to greatly enhance downtown’s “green infrastructure”;

Whereas, Current and long-term fiscal constraints hinder public sector stakeholders from
developing new parks and public amenities or enhancing existing assets single-handedly;

Whereas, It is believed that downtown Minneapolis would benefit from one or more non-profit
conservancies and/or private/public partnerships to aggregate public, private and non-profit
funding and coordinate leadership towards the design, development, maintenance and
programming of new and existing parks and public realm amenities;

Whereas, The Downtown Improvement District, acting as a fiscal agent and coordinator, plans
to hire a consultant to conduct a study to determine the feasibility and approach for creating a
Downtown Minneapolis Public Realm Conservancy; and

Whereas, Funding is being sought from the potential future partners of the conservancy,
including public, private and non-profit organizations to conduct this feasibility study:

RESOLVED, That the Commissioners of the Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board serve as a
partner with the Downtown Improvement District and provide $25,000 toward hiring a consultant
to conduct a study to determine the feasibility and approach for creating a Downtown
Minneapolis Public Realm Conservancy; and

RESOLVED, That the President of the Board and Secretary to the Board are authorized to take
all necessary administrative actions to implement this resolution.

Adopted by the Park & Recreation Board
In formal meeting assembled on November 22, 2011



                                                        ______________________________
                                                        John Erwin, President


                                                                                                     7.6
Posted by http://MillCityTimes.com




                                    ______________________________
                                    Karen Robinson, Secretary

Approved:

_________________________________
R.T. Rybak, Mayor




                                                                               7.6
Posted by http://MillCityTimes.com




TO:            Administration and Finance Committee

FROM:          Jayne Miller, Superintendent

DATE:          November 9, 2011

SUBJECT:       Resolution to Identify the Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board as a Partner
               with the Downtown Improvement District and to provide $25,000 toward hiring a
               Consultant to Conduct a Study to Determine the Feasibility and Approach for
               Creating a Downtown Minneapolis Public Realm Conservancy
               .

BACKGROUND

In order to make downtown Minneapolis a more attractive and welcoming environment for its
growing residential population and workforce, business and community leaders are defining
various initiatives to greatly enhance downtown’s “green infrastructure” (e.g. street trees, storm
water retention & parks) and public realm (e.g. streetscapes, public gathering places). Current
and long-term fiscal constraints hinder public sector stakeholders from developing new parks
and public amenities or enhancing existing assets single-handedly. It is believed that downtown
Minneapolis would benefit from a non-profit conservancy to aggregate public, private and non-
profit funding and coordinate leadership towards the design, development, maintenance and
programming of new and existing parks and public realm amenities.


The Downtown Improvement District, acting as a fiscal agent and coordinator, plans to hire a
consultant to conduct a study to determine the feasibility and approach for creating a Downtown
Minneapolis Public Realm Conservancy. Approximately $100,000 is required to conduct the
feasibility study, and funding is being sought from the potential future partners of the
conservancy, including public, private and non-profit organizations.

The Superintendent and Park Board President are asking that the Minneapolis Park and
Recreation Board serve as a partner with the DID in this effort and contribute $25,000 toward
hiring a consultant to conduct a study to determine the feasibility and approach for creating a
Downtown Minneapolis Public Realm Conservancy. Funds are available in the 2011 general
fund to cover this expense.


RECOMMENDATION

Staff recommends that the Board identify the Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board as a
partner with the Downtown Improvement District and provide $25,000 toward hiring a consultant
to conduct a study to determine the feasibility and approach for creating a Downtown
Minneapolis Public Realm Conservancy.


                                                                                                      7.6
Posted by http://MillCityTimes.com




Attachment: RFP – Downtown Minneapolis Public Realm Conservancy Feasibility Study


Prepared by: Jayne Miller, Superintendent
Reviewed and Approved by: John Erwin, President




                                                                                                7.6
Posted by http://MillCityTimes.com




                    REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL
   Downtown Minneapolis Public Realm Conservancy Feasibility Study


Introduction and Context

Downtown 2025, an initiative of the Minneapolis Downtown Council, has
brought together Minneapolis business community leaders, local residents,
non-profit leaders and members of the public sector to envision a brighter
future for downtown Minneapolis in the coming years, and will shortly release
its strategic vision for the city. This group recognizes that in order to create a
world class downtown public realm, significant funds must be invested in key
public realm initiatives, to include parks, plazas and general public realm
improvements. Long-term fiscal constraints prevent traditional public sector
stakeholders from properly maintaining existing assets or developing new
parks and public amenities single-handedly.

It is believed that downtown Minneapolis would benefit from a non-profit
conservancy to aggregate public, private and non-profit funding and coordinate
leadership towards the design, development, maintenance and programming of
existing and new parks and public realm amenities. Coordination and
alignment between the many current and planned parks and public realm
initiatives would be a core function.

To that end, the Minneapolis Downtown Improvement District (DID), acting as
the fiscal agent and project coordinator for the Greening and Public Realm
Sub-committee of the Downtown 2025 Initiative, is soliciting proposals to
exploring the feasibility of a Downtown Minneapolis Public Realm Conservancy.

Objective of the Conservancy
Foster, develop, implement and/or manage several types of public realm
projects in downtown Minneapolis by
    Providing strategic, planning and design, project management,
      maintenance, operation and coordination expertise and services
    Raising capital for design, implementation, operations, programming and
      maintenance (from public, private, non-profit sources)
    Providing ongoing operations, programming and maintenance services


Key Components of the Conservancy
   Flexible model that supports different stakeholders and functions
     depending on the initiative
   Robust fundraising capability
   Ability to coordinate and align business community, non-profit
     organizations and residents with public sector stakeholders, (City,

Minneapolis Conservancy RFP          Page 1 of 5                             10/3/2011
                                                                                             7.6
Posted by http://MillCityTimes.com




       County, Park Board, Met Council, Metro Transit, State, National Park
       Service, etc.)
      Strong project management and operations capabilities
      Ability to grow over time and operate “at scale”
      Minimize redundancy and overlap with other organizations

Objective of Feasibility Study
The feasibility study shall identify all elements necessary for launch of a
successful conservancy in Minneapolis. This study shall:
    Confirm high level business case for enhancing Downtown’s public realm
    Survey stakeholders on public realm enhancement
    Confirm capabilities required to achieve public realm enhancement
    Confirm that existing organizations (City, Park Board, Parks Foundation,
      etc.) do not and will not adequately support the capabilities
    Determine if there is an existing organization well positioned to
      undertake the required functions
    Develop an implementation approach and plan for establishing the
      Downtown Minneapolis Public Realm Conservancy
    Develop a list of key issues to be considered by the DID Board of
      Directors, public sector, philanthropic community and the general public
    Identify preliminary budget for the Conservancy, to include
      implementation, operation and maintenance funds for existing sites and
      those presented in the Downtown 2025 Plan, using local and national
      precedents.


Sample Feasibility Study Activities
Study activities will include, but not be limited to, those below. Suggestions for
other reports and activities that may be helpful in achieving the objectives
above would be appreciated. Please indicate whether the proposed activities
would be included in the proposed fee, or additional services.
    Review the responsibilities and budgets of all organizations currently
      working to achieve aspects of the proposed new organization’s mission in
      downtown, identifying organizational overlaps and understanding
      current and historic spending on all mission-related investments.
    Develop preliminary capital and operations and maintenance budgets for
      proposed downtown Minneapolis public realm improvements through
      local and national precedent analyses.
    Review alternative organizational model precedents in terms of
      advantages and disadvantages as related to achieving the intended
      mission for downtown Minneapolis, including alternatives for securing
      the required funding sources.
    Structure an organization best positioned to fulfill the stated mission for
      Minneapolis, including outlining its legal structure, organizational


Minneapolis Conservancy RFP         Page 2 of 5                             10/3/2011
                                                                                            7.6
Posted by http://MillCityTimes.com




       relationships and required agreements, and developing a strategic
       business plan framework.

Key Deliverables of Feasibility Study
   Business Case and Stakeholder Survey Results
   Downtown 2025 Proposed Project Capital, Operations and Maintenance
     Budgets
   Summary of Current Minneapolis Park/Greening/Public Realm
     Organization Environment
   Conservancy Organization Model
   Implementation Approach and Plan

Feasibility Study Timeline
   RFP issued: October 3
   Proposals Due: October 14
   Review/Follow-up and Award: October 28
   Contract Completed and Project Launch: November 7
   Project Execution: November thru February, 2012
   Present Findings: March 2012


Submittal Information
Proposals must be received on or before 12 pm on Friday October 14th,
2011. Please email your proposal in pdf format to
bshogren@minneapolisdid.com

Contract and Client
The contract shall be between the selected Vendor and the DID. Attached is
the contract form. Please review and ensure terms are acceptable. DID’s
ability to modify the contract is limited; if your review reveals issues that
require negotiation, please address with DID prior to submitting a proposal.

Proposal Requirements
Submittal must include:

      Company/business information
         o Name, address, telephone and fax numbers, email addresses.
         o Name of parent company, if any.
         o Number of years in business.
         o Company’s Federal ID number.
         o Names and contact information for project team. Include resumes
            and responsibilities for each individual and percentage of time
            each would devote to the work.
      Experience and References
         o Firm Introduction

Minneapolis Conservancy RFP        Page 3 of 5                             10/3/2011
                                                                                           7.6
Posted by http://MillCityTimes.com




         o Describe all relevant experience with at least three references,
            including contact names and telephone numbers.
         o Provide three specific completed projects that reflect similar goals
            objectives and outcomes as those included within this project
            scope.
         o Indicate all projects done in Minneapolis, including brief scope and
            key stakeholders involved in each.
      Contract and Schedule
         o Acceptance of contract terms and project timeline
      Cost

Selection Criteria
A selection committee will evaluate each submission pursuant to this Request
for Proposal, and will select the vendor which, in its sole judgment,
successfully demonstrates the qualities and skills necessary to undertake the
project and meet the goals of the committee. Decisions will be made on the
following criteria:

      Background knowledge and understanding of similar projects,
       demonstrated ability and experience.
      Cost.
      Responsiveness to this RFP.
      Ability of the vendor to complete the project in the timeframe outlined.
      Other criteria as determined, at the sole discretion of the Selection
       Committee.


Termination/Rejection
DID reserves the right, in its sole and absolute discretion to: a) reject any and
all proposals submitted without negotiation or comment; b) accept any
proposal as submitted without negotiation or comment; c) require revisions to,
corrections of, or other changes to any proposal submitted as conditions
precedent to further consideration; d) select one or more proposals for
negotiations; e) seek new proposals from new or existing vendors; and/or f)
withdraw this Request for Proposal without notice.

About the DID
Launched in 2009, the DID is a 501(c)6 non-profit organization with the
mission of making Downtown Minneapolis a thriving and competitive business
environment for recruiting and retaining businesses, employees, residents and
visitors. DID does so by delivering clean, safe, green and better services that
raise the overall standard of care and behavior in downtown’s public spaces,
partnering with the public and private sector on safety and livability initiatives
and advocating for the business community. The DID has a wholly-controlled
501(c)3 subsidiary, Minneapolis SafeZone Collaborative, that raises funds and

Minneapolis Conservancy RFP         Page 4 of 5                             10/3/2011
                                                                                            7.6
Posted by http://MillCityTimes.com




implements programs to make downtown safer and more attractive. More
information can be found at www.minneapolisdid.com

Questions
For questions please contact Beth Shogren
(612.961.7663, bshogren@minneapolisdid.com)




Minneapolis Conservancy RFP     Page 5 of 5                           10/3/2011
                                                                                      7.6

More Related Content

Viewers also liked

Resolution Adopting Amended Chapter 11 of the Minneapolis Park and Recreation...
Resolution Adopting Amended Chapter 11 of the Minneapolis Park and Recreation...Resolution Adopting Amended Chapter 11 of the Minneapolis Park and Recreation...
Resolution Adopting Amended Chapter 11 of the Minneapolis Park and Recreation...Mill City Times
 
Minneapolis RiverCurrent 10-13-11
Minneapolis RiverCurrent 10-13-11Minneapolis RiverCurrent 10-13-11
Minneapolis RiverCurrent 10-13-11Mill City Times
 
Above the Falls Policy Review and Implementation Study Presentation 9-27-2011
Above the Falls Policy Review and Implementation Study Presentation 9-27-2011Above the Falls Policy Review and Implementation Study Presentation 9-27-2011
Above the Falls Policy Review and Implementation Study Presentation 9-27-2011Mill City Times
 
Sanctuary Pink Tasting Menu
Sanctuary Pink Tasting MenuSanctuary Pink Tasting Menu
Sanctuary Pink Tasting MenuMill City Times
 
Chute Square Park Press Release 102711
Chute Square Park Press Release 102711Chute Square Park Press Release 102711
Chute Square Park Press Release 102711Mill City Times
 
Minneapolis RiverCurrent 10-6-11
Minneapolis RiverCurrent 10-6-11Minneapolis RiverCurrent 10-6-11
Minneapolis RiverCurrent 10-6-11Mill City Times
 
Essential things that should always be in your car
Essential things that should always be in your carEssential things that should always be in your car
Essential things that should always be in your carEason Chan
 

Viewers also liked (9)

Resolution Adopting Amended Chapter 11 of the Minneapolis Park and Recreation...
Resolution Adopting Amended Chapter 11 of the Minneapolis Park and Recreation...Resolution Adopting Amended Chapter 11 of the Minneapolis Park and Recreation...
Resolution Adopting Amended Chapter 11 of the Minneapolis Park and Recreation...
 
Minneapolis RiverCurrent 10-13-11
Minneapolis RiverCurrent 10-13-11Minneapolis RiverCurrent 10-13-11
Minneapolis RiverCurrent 10-13-11
 
Above the Falls Policy Review and Implementation Study Presentation 9-27-2011
Above the Falls Policy Review and Implementation Study Presentation 9-27-2011Above the Falls Policy Review and Implementation Study Presentation 9-27-2011
Above the Falls Policy Review and Implementation Study Presentation 9-27-2011
 
Wikileaks ante litteram
Wikileaks ante litteramWikileaks ante litteram
Wikileaks ante litteram
 
Sanctuary Pink Tasting Menu
Sanctuary Pink Tasting MenuSanctuary Pink Tasting Menu
Sanctuary Pink Tasting Menu
 
Chute Square Park Press Release 102711
Chute Square Park Press Release 102711Chute Square Park Press Release 102711
Chute Square Park Press Release 102711
 
Minneapolis RiverCurrent 10-6-11
Minneapolis RiverCurrent 10-6-11Minneapolis RiverCurrent 10-6-11
Minneapolis RiverCurrent 10-6-11
 
Dayana
DayanaDayana
Dayana
 
Essential things that should always be in your car
Essential things that should always be in your carEssential things that should always be in your car
Essential things that should always be in your car
 

More from Mill City Times

Minneapolis RiverCurrent 10-28-11
Minneapolis RiverCurrent 10-28-11Minneapolis RiverCurrent 10-28-11
Minneapolis RiverCurrent 10-28-11Mill City Times
 
Minneapolis RiverCurrent 10-19-11
Minneapolis RiverCurrent 10-19-11Minneapolis RiverCurrent 10-19-11
Minneapolis RiverCurrent 10-19-11Mill City Times
 
East Downtown Council Job Posting for Executive Assistant
East Downtown Council Job Posting for Executive AssistantEast Downtown Council Job Posting for Executive Assistant
East Downtown Council Job Posting for Executive AssistantMill City Times
 
Vikings Stadium Proposal Risk Analysis Report
Vikings Stadium Proposal Risk Analysis ReportVikings Stadium Proposal Risk Analysis Report
Vikings Stadium Proposal Risk Analysis ReportMill City Times
 
Third Ward NeighborhoodFest 2011
Third Ward NeighborhoodFest 2011Third Ward NeighborhoodFest 2011
Third Ward NeighborhoodFest 2011Mill City Times
 
DMNA Annual Meeting Agenda 10-11-11
DMNA Annual Meeting Agenda 10-11-11DMNA Annual Meeting Agenda 10-11-11
DMNA Annual Meeting Agenda 10-11-11Mill City Times
 
Minneapolis RiverCurrent 9-29-11
Minneapolis RiverCurrent 9-29-11Minneapolis RiverCurrent 9-29-11
Minneapolis RiverCurrent 9-29-11Mill City Times
 
Minneapolis RiverCurrent 9-22-11
Minneapolis RiverCurrent 9-22-11Minneapolis RiverCurrent 9-22-11
Minneapolis RiverCurrent 9-22-11Mill City Times
 
For distribution RiverFIRST Letter From Diane Hofstede 9.7.11
For distribution RiverFIRST Letter From Diane Hofstede 9.7.11For distribution RiverFIRST Letter From Diane Hofstede 9.7.11
For distribution RiverFIRST Letter From Diane Hofstede 9.7.11Mill City Times
 
Loft Development Assistant Posting 9 2011_final
Loft Development Assistant Posting 9 2011_finalLoft Development Assistant Posting 9 2011_final
Loft Development Assistant Posting 9 2011_finalMill City Times
 
Minneapolis RiverCurrent 9-15-11
Minneapolis RiverCurrent 9-15-11Minneapolis RiverCurrent 9-15-11
Minneapolis RiverCurrent 9-15-11Mill City Times
 
Dredge Thompson Photos from Big River Magazine
Dredge Thompson Photos from Big River MagazineDredge Thompson Photos from Big River Magazine
Dredge Thompson Photos from Big River MagazineMill City Times
 
Minneapolis RiverCurrent 9-8-11
Minneapolis RiverCurrent 9-8-11Minneapolis RiverCurrent 9-8-11
Minneapolis RiverCurrent 9-8-11Mill City Times
 
Fuji Ya - Waterworks Site Resolution from Minneapolis Park Board
Fuji Ya - Waterworks Site Resolution from Minneapolis Park BoardFuji Ya - Waterworks Site Resolution from Minneapolis Park Board
Fuji Ya - Waterworks Site Resolution from Minneapolis Park BoardMill City Times
 
Minneapolis RiverCurrent 9-1-11
Minneapolis RiverCurrent 9-1-11Minneapolis RiverCurrent 9-1-11
Minneapolis RiverCurrent 9-1-11Mill City Times
 
Minneapolis RiverCurrent 8-24-11
Minneapolis RiverCurrent 8-24-11Minneapolis RiverCurrent 8-24-11
Minneapolis RiverCurrent 8-24-11Mill City Times
 

More from Mill City Times (16)

Minneapolis RiverCurrent 10-28-11
Minneapolis RiverCurrent 10-28-11Minneapolis RiverCurrent 10-28-11
Minneapolis RiverCurrent 10-28-11
 
Minneapolis RiverCurrent 10-19-11
Minneapolis RiverCurrent 10-19-11Minneapolis RiverCurrent 10-19-11
Minneapolis RiverCurrent 10-19-11
 
East Downtown Council Job Posting for Executive Assistant
East Downtown Council Job Posting for Executive AssistantEast Downtown Council Job Posting for Executive Assistant
East Downtown Council Job Posting for Executive Assistant
 
Vikings Stadium Proposal Risk Analysis Report
Vikings Stadium Proposal Risk Analysis ReportVikings Stadium Proposal Risk Analysis Report
Vikings Stadium Proposal Risk Analysis Report
 
Third Ward NeighborhoodFest 2011
Third Ward NeighborhoodFest 2011Third Ward NeighborhoodFest 2011
Third Ward NeighborhoodFest 2011
 
DMNA Annual Meeting Agenda 10-11-11
DMNA Annual Meeting Agenda 10-11-11DMNA Annual Meeting Agenda 10-11-11
DMNA Annual Meeting Agenda 10-11-11
 
Minneapolis RiverCurrent 9-29-11
Minneapolis RiverCurrent 9-29-11Minneapolis RiverCurrent 9-29-11
Minneapolis RiverCurrent 9-29-11
 
Minneapolis RiverCurrent 9-22-11
Minneapolis RiverCurrent 9-22-11Minneapolis RiverCurrent 9-22-11
Minneapolis RiverCurrent 9-22-11
 
For distribution RiverFIRST Letter From Diane Hofstede 9.7.11
For distribution RiverFIRST Letter From Diane Hofstede 9.7.11For distribution RiverFIRST Letter From Diane Hofstede 9.7.11
For distribution RiverFIRST Letter From Diane Hofstede 9.7.11
 
Loft Development Assistant Posting 9 2011_final
Loft Development Assistant Posting 9 2011_finalLoft Development Assistant Posting 9 2011_final
Loft Development Assistant Posting 9 2011_final
 
Minneapolis RiverCurrent 9-15-11
Minneapolis RiverCurrent 9-15-11Minneapolis RiverCurrent 9-15-11
Minneapolis RiverCurrent 9-15-11
 
Dredge Thompson Photos from Big River Magazine
Dredge Thompson Photos from Big River MagazineDredge Thompson Photos from Big River Magazine
Dredge Thompson Photos from Big River Magazine
 
Minneapolis RiverCurrent 9-8-11
Minneapolis RiverCurrent 9-8-11Minneapolis RiverCurrent 9-8-11
Minneapolis RiverCurrent 9-8-11
 
Fuji Ya - Waterworks Site Resolution from Minneapolis Park Board
Fuji Ya - Waterworks Site Resolution from Minneapolis Park BoardFuji Ya - Waterworks Site Resolution from Minneapolis Park Board
Fuji Ya - Waterworks Site Resolution from Minneapolis Park Board
 
Minneapolis RiverCurrent 9-1-11
Minneapolis RiverCurrent 9-1-11Minneapolis RiverCurrent 9-1-11
Minneapolis RiverCurrent 9-1-11
 
Minneapolis RiverCurrent 8-24-11
Minneapolis RiverCurrent 8-24-11Minneapolis RiverCurrent 8-24-11
Minneapolis RiverCurrent 8-24-11
 

Recently uploaded

Are Multi-Cloud and Serverless Good or Bad?
Are Multi-Cloud and Serverless Good or Bad?Are Multi-Cloud and Serverless Good or Bad?
Are Multi-Cloud and Serverless Good or Bad?Mattias Andersson
 
Artificial intelligence in cctv survelliance.pptx
Artificial intelligence in cctv survelliance.pptxArtificial intelligence in cctv survelliance.pptx
Artificial intelligence in cctv survelliance.pptxhariprasad279825
 
Tech-Forward - Achieving Business Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365
Tech-Forward - Achieving Business Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365Tech-Forward - Achieving Business Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365
Tech-Forward - Achieving Business Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 3652toLead Limited
 
Advanced Test Driven-Development @ php[tek] 2024
Advanced Test Driven-Development @ php[tek] 2024Advanced Test Driven-Development @ php[tek] 2024
Advanced Test Driven-Development @ php[tek] 2024Scott Keck-Warren
 
Human Factors of XR: Using Human Factors to Design XR Systems
Human Factors of XR: Using Human Factors to Design XR SystemsHuman Factors of XR: Using Human Factors to Design XR Systems
Human Factors of XR: Using Human Factors to Design XR SystemsMark Billinghurst
 
DevEX - reference for building teams, processes, and platforms
DevEX - reference for building teams, processes, and platformsDevEX - reference for building teams, processes, and platforms
DevEX - reference for building teams, processes, and platformsSergiu Bodiu
 
Unraveling Multimodality with Large Language Models.pdf
Unraveling Multimodality with Large Language Models.pdfUnraveling Multimodality with Large Language Models.pdf
Unraveling Multimodality with Large Language Models.pdfAlex Barbosa Coqueiro
 
Powerpoint exploring the locations used in television show Time Clash
Powerpoint exploring the locations used in television show Time ClashPowerpoint exploring the locations used in television show Time Clash
Powerpoint exploring the locations used in television show Time Clashcharlottematthew16
 
WordPress Websites for Engineers: Elevate Your Brand
WordPress Websites for Engineers: Elevate Your BrandWordPress Websites for Engineers: Elevate Your Brand
WordPress Websites for Engineers: Elevate Your Brandgvaughan
 
Beyond Boundaries: Leveraging No-Code Solutions for Industry Innovation
Beyond Boundaries: Leveraging No-Code Solutions for Industry InnovationBeyond Boundaries: Leveraging No-Code Solutions for Industry Innovation
Beyond Boundaries: Leveraging No-Code Solutions for Industry InnovationSafe Software
 
Bun (KitWorks Team Study 노별마루 발표 2024.4.22)
Bun (KitWorks Team Study 노별마루 발표 2024.4.22)Bun (KitWorks Team Study 노별마루 발표 2024.4.22)
Bun (KitWorks Team Study 노별마루 발표 2024.4.22)Wonjun Hwang
 
"Federated learning: out of reach no matter how close",Oleksandr Lapshyn
"Federated learning: out of reach no matter how close",Oleksandr Lapshyn"Federated learning: out of reach no matter how close",Oleksandr Lapshyn
"Federated learning: out of reach no matter how close",Oleksandr LapshynFwdays
 
SAP Build Work Zone - Overview L2-L3.pptx
SAP Build Work Zone - Overview L2-L3.pptxSAP Build Work Zone - Overview L2-L3.pptx
SAP Build Work Zone - Overview L2-L3.pptxNavinnSomaal
 
SQL Database Design For Developers at php[tek] 2024
SQL Database Design For Developers at php[tek] 2024SQL Database Design For Developers at php[tek] 2024
SQL Database Design For Developers at php[tek] 2024Scott Keck-Warren
 
Scanning the Internet for External Cloud Exposures via SSL Certs
Scanning the Internet for External Cloud Exposures via SSL CertsScanning the Internet for External Cloud Exposures via SSL Certs
Scanning the Internet for External Cloud Exposures via SSL CertsRizwan Syed
 
Automating Business Process via MuleSoft Composer | Bangalore MuleSoft Meetup...
Automating Business Process via MuleSoft Composer | Bangalore MuleSoft Meetup...Automating Business Process via MuleSoft Composer | Bangalore MuleSoft Meetup...
Automating Business Process via MuleSoft Composer | Bangalore MuleSoft Meetup...shyamraj55
 
Connect Wave/ connectwave Pitch Deck Presentation
Connect Wave/ connectwave Pitch Deck PresentationConnect Wave/ connectwave Pitch Deck Presentation
Connect Wave/ connectwave Pitch Deck PresentationSlibray Presentation
 
Install Stable Diffusion in windows machine
Install Stable Diffusion in windows machineInstall Stable Diffusion in windows machine
Install Stable Diffusion in windows machinePadma Pradeep
 
Unleash Your Potential - Namagunga Girls Coding Club
Unleash Your Potential - Namagunga Girls Coding ClubUnleash Your Potential - Namagunga Girls Coding Club
Unleash Your Potential - Namagunga Girls Coding ClubKalema Edgar
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Are Multi-Cloud and Serverless Good or Bad?
Are Multi-Cloud and Serverless Good or Bad?Are Multi-Cloud and Serverless Good or Bad?
Are Multi-Cloud and Serverless Good or Bad?
 
Artificial intelligence in cctv survelliance.pptx
Artificial intelligence in cctv survelliance.pptxArtificial intelligence in cctv survelliance.pptx
Artificial intelligence in cctv survelliance.pptx
 
Tech-Forward - Achieving Business Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365
Tech-Forward - Achieving Business Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365Tech-Forward - Achieving Business Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365
Tech-Forward - Achieving Business Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365
 
Advanced Test Driven-Development @ php[tek] 2024
Advanced Test Driven-Development @ php[tek] 2024Advanced Test Driven-Development @ php[tek] 2024
Advanced Test Driven-Development @ php[tek] 2024
 
Human Factors of XR: Using Human Factors to Design XR Systems
Human Factors of XR: Using Human Factors to Design XR SystemsHuman Factors of XR: Using Human Factors to Design XR Systems
Human Factors of XR: Using Human Factors to Design XR Systems
 
DevEX - reference for building teams, processes, and platforms
DevEX - reference for building teams, processes, and platformsDevEX - reference for building teams, processes, and platforms
DevEX - reference for building teams, processes, and platforms
 
Unraveling Multimodality with Large Language Models.pdf
Unraveling Multimodality with Large Language Models.pdfUnraveling Multimodality with Large Language Models.pdf
Unraveling Multimodality with Large Language Models.pdf
 
Powerpoint exploring the locations used in television show Time Clash
Powerpoint exploring the locations used in television show Time ClashPowerpoint exploring the locations used in television show Time Clash
Powerpoint exploring the locations used in television show Time Clash
 
WordPress Websites for Engineers: Elevate Your Brand
WordPress Websites for Engineers: Elevate Your BrandWordPress Websites for Engineers: Elevate Your Brand
WordPress Websites for Engineers: Elevate Your Brand
 
Beyond Boundaries: Leveraging No-Code Solutions for Industry Innovation
Beyond Boundaries: Leveraging No-Code Solutions for Industry InnovationBeyond Boundaries: Leveraging No-Code Solutions for Industry Innovation
Beyond Boundaries: Leveraging No-Code Solutions for Industry Innovation
 
Bun (KitWorks Team Study 노별마루 발표 2024.4.22)
Bun (KitWorks Team Study 노별마루 발표 2024.4.22)Bun (KitWorks Team Study 노별마루 발표 2024.4.22)
Bun (KitWorks Team Study 노별마루 발표 2024.4.22)
 
"Federated learning: out of reach no matter how close",Oleksandr Lapshyn
"Federated learning: out of reach no matter how close",Oleksandr Lapshyn"Federated learning: out of reach no matter how close",Oleksandr Lapshyn
"Federated learning: out of reach no matter how close",Oleksandr Lapshyn
 
SAP Build Work Zone - Overview L2-L3.pptx
SAP Build Work Zone - Overview L2-L3.pptxSAP Build Work Zone - Overview L2-L3.pptx
SAP Build Work Zone - Overview L2-L3.pptx
 
SQL Database Design For Developers at php[tek] 2024
SQL Database Design For Developers at php[tek] 2024SQL Database Design For Developers at php[tek] 2024
SQL Database Design For Developers at php[tek] 2024
 
E-Vehicle_Hacking_by_Parul Sharma_null_owasp.pptx
E-Vehicle_Hacking_by_Parul Sharma_null_owasp.pptxE-Vehicle_Hacking_by_Parul Sharma_null_owasp.pptx
E-Vehicle_Hacking_by_Parul Sharma_null_owasp.pptx
 
Scanning the Internet for External Cloud Exposures via SSL Certs
Scanning the Internet for External Cloud Exposures via SSL CertsScanning the Internet for External Cloud Exposures via SSL Certs
Scanning the Internet for External Cloud Exposures via SSL Certs
 
Automating Business Process via MuleSoft Composer | Bangalore MuleSoft Meetup...
Automating Business Process via MuleSoft Composer | Bangalore MuleSoft Meetup...Automating Business Process via MuleSoft Composer | Bangalore MuleSoft Meetup...
Automating Business Process via MuleSoft Composer | Bangalore MuleSoft Meetup...
 
Connect Wave/ connectwave Pitch Deck Presentation
Connect Wave/ connectwave Pitch Deck PresentationConnect Wave/ connectwave Pitch Deck Presentation
Connect Wave/ connectwave Pitch Deck Presentation
 
Install Stable Diffusion in windows machine
Install Stable Diffusion in windows machineInstall Stable Diffusion in windows machine
Install Stable Diffusion in windows machine
 
Unleash Your Potential - Namagunga Girls Coding Club
Unleash Your Potential - Namagunga Girls Coding ClubUnleash Your Potential - Namagunga Girls Coding Club
Unleash Your Potential - Namagunga Girls Coding Club
 

Resolution to Identify the Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board as a Partner with the Downtown Improvement District to Study the Feasibility and Approach for Creating a Downtown Minneapolis Public Realm Conservancy

  • 1. Posted by http://MillCityTimes.com Resolution 2011-209 Resolution to Identify the Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board as a Partner with the Downtown Improvement District and to provide $25,000 toward hiring a Consultant to Conduct a Study to Determine the Feasibility and Approach for Creating a Downtown Minneapolis Public Realm Conservancy Whereas, In order to make downtown Minneapolis a more attractive and welcoming environment for its growing residential population and workforce, business and community leaders are defining various initiatives to greatly enhance downtown’s “green infrastructure”; Whereas, Current and long-term fiscal constraints hinder public sector stakeholders from developing new parks and public amenities or enhancing existing assets single-handedly; Whereas, It is believed that downtown Minneapolis would benefit from one or more non-profit conservancies and/or private/public partnerships to aggregate public, private and non-profit funding and coordinate leadership towards the design, development, maintenance and programming of new and existing parks and public realm amenities; Whereas, The Downtown Improvement District, acting as a fiscal agent and coordinator, plans to hire a consultant to conduct a study to determine the feasibility and approach for creating a Downtown Minneapolis Public Realm Conservancy; and Whereas, Funding is being sought from the potential future partners of the conservancy, including public, private and non-profit organizations to conduct this feasibility study: RESOLVED, That the Commissioners of the Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board serve as a partner with the Downtown Improvement District and provide $25,000 toward hiring a consultant to conduct a study to determine the feasibility and approach for creating a Downtown Minneapolis Public Realm Conservancy; and RESOLVED, That the President of the Board and Secretary to the Board are authorized to take all necessary administrative actions to implement this resolution. Adopted by the Park & Recreation Board In formal meeting assembled on November 22, 2011 ______________________________ John Erwin, President 7.6
  • 2. Posted by http://MillCityTimes.com ______________________________ Karen Robinson, Secretary Approved: _________________________________ R.T. Rybak, Mayor 7.6
  • 3. Posted by http://MillCityTimes.com TO: Administration and Finance Committee FROM: Jayne Miller, Superintendent DATE: November 9, 2011 SUBJECT: Resolution to Identify the Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board as a Partner with the Downtown Improvement District and to provide $25,000 toward hiring a Consultant to Conduct a Study to Determine the Feasibility and Approach for Creating a Downtown Minneapolis Public Realm Conservancy . BACKGROUND In order to make downtown Minneapolis a more attractive and welcoming environment for its growing residential population and workforce, business and community leaders are defining various initiatives to greatly enhance downtown’s “green infrastructure” (e.g. street trees, storm water retention & parks) and public realm (e.g. streetscapes, public gathering places). Current and long-term fiscal constraints hinder public sector stakeholders from developing new parks and public amenities or enhancing existing assets single-handedly. It is believed that downtown Minneapolis would benefit from a non-profit conservancy to aggregate public, private and non- profit funding and coordinate leadership towards the design, development, maintenance and programming of new and existing parks and public realm amenities. The Downtown Improvement District, acting as a fiscal agent and coordinator, plans to hire a consultant to conduct a study to determine the feasibility and approach for creating a Downtown Minneapolis Public Realm Conservancy. Approximately $100,000 is required to conduct the feasibility study, and funding is being sought from the potential future partners of the conservancy, including public, private and non-profit organizations. The Superintendent and Park Board President are asking that the Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board serve as a partner with the DID in this effort and contribute $25,000 toward hiring a consultant to conduct a study to determine the feasibility and approach for creating a Downtown Minneapolis Public Realm Conservancy. Funds are available in the 2011 general fund to cover this expense. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board identify the Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board as a partner with the Downtown Improvement District and provide $25,000 toward hiring a consultant to conduct a study to determine the feasibility and approach for creating a Downtown Minneapolis Public Realm Conservancy. 7.6
  • 4. Posted by http://MillCityTimes.com Attachment: RFP – Downtown Minneapolis Public Realm Conservancy Feasibility Study Prepared by: Jayne Miller, Superintendent Reviewed and Approved by: John Erwin, President 7.6
  • 5. Posted by http://MillCityTimes.com REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Downtown Minneapolis Public Realm Conservancy Feasibility Study Introduction and Context Downtown 2025, an initiative of the Minneapolis Downtown Council, has brought together Minneapolis business community leaders, local residents, non-profit leaders and members of the public sector to envision a brighter future for downtown Minneapolis in the coming years, and will shortly release its strategic vision for the city. This group recognizes that in order to create a world class downtown public realm, significant funds must be invested in key public realm initiatives, to include parks, plazas and general public realm improvements. Long-term fiscal constraints prevent traditional public sector stakeholders from properly maintaining existing assets or developing new parks and public amenities single-handedly. It is believed that downtown Minneapolis would benefit from a non-profit conservancy to aggregate public, private and non-profit funding and coordinate leadership towards the design, development, maintenance and programming of existing and new parks and public realm amenities. Coordination and alignment between the many current and planned parks and public realm initiatives would be a core function. To that end, the Minneapolis Downtown Improvement District (DID), acting as the fiscal agent and project coordinator for the Greening and Public Realm Sub-committee of the Downtown 2025 Initiative, is soliciting proposals to exploring the feasibility of a Downtown Minneapolis Public Realm Conservancy. Objective of the Conservancy Foster, develop, implement and/or manage several types of public realm projects in downtown Minneapolis by  Providing strategic, planning and design, project management, maintenance, operation and coordination expertise and services  Raising capital for design, implementation, operations, programming and maintenance (from public, private, non-profit sources)  Providing ongoing operations, programming and maintenance services Key Components of the Conservancy  Flexible model that supports different stakeholders and functions depending on the initiative  Robust fundraising capability  Ability to coordinate and align business community, non-profit organizations and residents with public sector stakeholders, (City, Minneapolis Conservancy RFP Page 1 of 5 10/3/2011 7.6
  • 6. Posted by http://MillCityTimes.com County, Park Board, Met Council, Metro Transit, State, National Park Service, etc.)  Strong project management and operations capabilities  Ability to grow over time and operate “at scale”  Minimize redundancy and overlap with other organizations Objective of Feasibility Study The feasibility study shall identify all elements necessary for launch of a successful conservancy in Minneapolis. This study shall:  Confirm high level business case for enhancing Downtown’s public realm  Survey stakeholders on public realm enhancement  Confirm capabilities required to achieve public realm enhancement  Confirm that existing organizations (City, Park Board, Parks Foundation, etc.) do not and will not adequately support the capabilities  Determine if there is an existing organization well positioned to undertake the required functions  Develop an implementation approach and plan for establishing the Downtown Minneapolis Public Realm Conservancy  Develop a list of key issues to be considered by the DID Board of Directors, public sector, philanthropic community and the general public  Identify preliminary budget for the Conservancy, to include implementation, operation and maintenance funds for existing sites and those presented in the Downtown 2025 Plan, using local and national precedents. Sample Feasibility Study Activities Study activities will include, but not be limited to, those below. Suggestions for other reports and activities that may be helpful in achieving the objectives above would be appreciated. Please indicate whether the proposed activities would be included in the proposed fee, or additional services.  Review the responsibilities and budgets of all organizations currently working to achieve aspects of the proposed new organization’s mission in downtown, identifying organizational overlaps and understanding current and historic spending on all mission-related investments.  Develop preliminary capital and operations and maintenance budgets for proposed downtown Minneapolis public realm improvements through local and national precedent analyses.  Review alternative organizational model precedents in terms of advantages and disadvantages as related to achieving the intended mission for downtown Minneapolis, including alternatives for securing the required funding sources.  Structure an organization best positioned to fulfill the stated mission for Minneapolis, including outlining its legal structure, organizational Minneapolis Conservancy RFP Page 2 of 5 10/3/2011 7.6
  • 7. Posted by http://MillCityTimes.com relationships and required agreements, and developing a strategic business plan framework. Key Deliverables of Feasibility Study  Business Case and Stakeholder Survey Results  Downtown 2025 Proposed Project Capital, Operations and Maintenance Budgets  Summary of Current Minneapolis Park/Greening/Public Realm Organization Environment  Conservancy Organization Model  Implementation Approach and Plan Feasibility Study Timeline  RFP issued: October 3  Proposals Due: October 14  Review/Follow-up and Award: October 28  Contract Completed and Project Launch: November 7  Project Execution: November thru February, 2012  Present Findings: March 2012 Submittal Information Proposals must be received on or before 12 pm on Friday October 14th, 2011. Please email your proposal in pdf format to bshogren@minneapolisdid.com Contract and Client The contract shall be between the selected Vendor and the DID. Attached is the contract form. Please review and ensure terms are acceptable. DID’s ability to modify the contract is limited; if your review reveals issues that require negotiation, please address with DID prior to submitting a proposal. Proposal Requirements Submittal must include:  Company/business information o Name, address, telephone and fax numbers, email addresses. o Name of parent company, if any. o Number of years in business. o Company’s Federal ID number. o Names and contact information for project team. Include resumes and responsibilities for each individual and percentage of time each would devote to the work.  Experience and References o Firm Introduction Minneapolis Conservancy RFP Page 3 of 5 10/3/2011 7.6
  • 8. Posted by http://MillCityTimes.com o Describe all relevant experience with at least three references, including contact names and telephone numbers. o Provide three specific completed projects that reflect similar goals objectives and outcomes as those included within this project scope. o Indicate all projects done in Minneapolis, including brief scope and key stakeholders involved in each.  Contract and Schedule o Acceptance of contract terms and project timeline  Cost Selection Criteria A selection committee will evaluate each submission pursuant to this Request for Proposal, and will select the vendor which, in its sole judgment, successfully demonstrates the qualities and skills necessary to undertake the project and meet the goals of the committee. Decisions will be made on the following criteria:  Background knowledge and understanding of similar projects, demonstrated ability and experience.  Cost.  Responsiveness to this RFP.  Ability of the vendor to complete the project in the timeframe outlined.  Other criteria as determined, at the sole discretion of the Selection Committee. Termination/Rejection DID reserves the right, in its sole and absolute discretion to: a) reject any and all proposals submitted without negotiation or comment; b) accept any proposal as submitted without negotiation or comment; c) require revisions to, corrections of, or other changes to any proposal submitted as conditions precedent to further consideration; d) select one or more proposals for negotiations; e) seek new proposals from new or existing vendors; and/or f) withdraw this Request for Proposal without notice. About the DID Launched in 2009, the DID is a 501(c)6 non-profit organization with the mission of making Downtown Minneapolis a thriving and competitive business environment for recruiting and retaining businesses, employees, residents and visitors. DID does so by delivering clean, safe, green and better services that raise the overall standard of care and behavior in downtown’s public spaces, partnering with the public and private sector on safety and livability initiatives and advocating for the business community. The DID has a wholly-controlled 501(c)3 subsidiary, Minneapolis SafeZone Collaborative, that raises funds and Minneapolis Conservancy RFP Page 4 of 5 10/3/2011 7.6
  • 9. Posted by http://MillCityTimes.com implements programs to make downtown safer and more attractive. More information can be found at www.minneapolisdid.com Questions For questions please contact Beth Shogren (612.961.7663, bshogren@minneapolisdid.com) Minneapolis Conservancy RFP Page 5 of 5 10/3/2011 7.6