Food Security in a changing Climate

1
University of the Witwatersrand
Faculty of Science
Department of Geography and Environmental Studies
FFOOOODD SSEECCUURRIITTYY IINN AA CCHHAANNGGIINNGG CCLLIIMMAATTEE:: EEXXPPLLOORRIINNGG TTHHEE PPOOTTEENNTTIIAALL
OOFF PPEERRMMAACCUULLTTUURREE AASS AANN AADDAAPPTTIIVVEE SSTTRRAATTEEGGYY AAGGAAIINNSSTT CCLLIIMMAATTEE
VVAARRIIAABBIILLIITTYY IINN KKIINNSSHHAASSAA,, DDEEMMOOCCRRAATTIICC RREEPPUUBBLLIICC OOFF CCOONNGGOO ((DDRRCC))
Ph.D. Research Proposal
By
M’VITA D M’BAMBI
Student No: 988850
Supervisor:
Dr. Danny Simatele
October, 2014 to March, 2015

2
Table of Contents
1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................3
2.-Problem Statement.............................................................................................................................4
3. Research Questions.............................................................................................................................5
4.-Research Aims and objectives ............................................................................................................5
5.-Theoretical and literature review considerations ..............................................................................6
6. Research knowledge gap and Relevance of study..............................................................................9
7.-Methodological considerations ..........................................................................................................9
7.4. Data Analysis..............................................................................................................................11
7.5. Description of the study sites ................................................................................................12
7.6. -Scope and limitations of the research ...................................................................................13
8. Ethical considerations.......................................................................................................................14
9. Proposed dissertation outline:..........................................................................................................15
10. TIMETABLE: PROPOSED SCHEDULE................................................................................................16
References: ...........................................................................................................................................19

3
1. Introduction
By definition “Food security exists when all people, at all times, have physical and economic
access to sufficient, safe and nutritious food that meets their dietary needs and food
preferences for an active and healthy life.” (WFS, 1996) For food security goals to be
successful, it must be considered within the larger framework of aspects such as climate
change and, socio-economic and environmental variables. Climate change can be partly
explained by the accumulation of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere that have been
increasing from the 1850s. This accumulation of gases is directly tied to global warming. FAO
(2008) explains that the burning of fossil fuels (coal, oil and gas) to meet the increasing
energy and food demand, coupled by deforestation has also contribute significantly to the
levels of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. The long term changes in weather conditions
termed climate change and climate variability will have serious impacts on the four pillars of
food security: (1) food availability, (2) food accessibility, (3) food utilization and (4) food
system stability. The effects of climate change are already being felt in global food markets,
and are likely to be particularly significant in developing countries within which agriculture
that is dependent on rainfall remains the primary source of food and income. The affected
population is mainly located in Sub-Saharan Africa.
According to the Millennium Development Goals (MDG), hunger and food insecurity are
among the major challenges affecting poor people. Studies commissioned by FAO (2011)
show that 823 million people in developing countries are malnourished. Experts warn that
with 9.6 billion people expected to inhabit the world by 2050, food security for all will
become harder to achieve (FAO, (2012). Sub-Saharan Africa for example, must triple food
production in order to satisfy population growth demand for food (Giyose, 2004).
Therefore, it requires not only; vigorous reforms in the agricultural and economic sectors as
well as taking into consideration nutrition to allow poverty reduction, but also a new vision
of carrying out these measures. This new vision must be realistic and based on social-
economic realities of the poor people: such as lack of money to buy imported inputs, limited
spaces, lack of formal or informal agricultural training and unemployment. Based on these
facts, it remains imperative that new agricultural approaches that are based on indigenous
knowledge combined with the best of new technologies be introduced into the agricultural
system. On the other hand approaches those are environmentally friendly and based on
local free natural resources most developing countries already have in abundance must be
taken into consideration. The new agricultural approach must therefore be designed
according to Permaculture design principles. This research is to enhance exploring the
possibilities of re-establishing constructive links, through Permaculture design, between the
land and the natural process that are tied to food security. These links are leading to the
promotion of a new urban ecology that can enable a synergy between people living in cities
and their immediate environment in multiple ways. According to FAO, (2011), this new
urban ecology seeks to establish the revolution of land use and particularly for cities in Sub-
Saharan Africa, where there are still plenty of lost green spaces within the cities. Taking all
this into account, when a large urban community is involved in urban cultivation or urban
gardening by implementing Permaculture design approaches such as those found in Hanna
Cuba, the result will be an immense contribution towards solving two major problems:
1. –feeding the growing population in the cities, and
2. –controlling the environmental degradation caused by population densities and
climate variability effects.

4
2.-Problem Statement
Since independence in 1960, Kinshasa, the Capital city of Congo (DRC) is rapid urbanization
with significant impacts on food security, living standards, lifestyles, social behaviours and
health. With this in mind, the DRC’s populations face serious nutritional problems but the
crisis has worsened felt in Kinshasa. According to various surveys and studies, these issues
are complex and vary from one county to another within the 24 counties of Kinshasa. This
unplanned urbanization affects not only young children, but extends to adult’s especially
pregnant and lactating women, students, and displaced populations. The factors that
correlate with food security in the DRC are: Poverty, unemployment, very low incomes and
wages, lack of strong extension services in agriculture, conventional agriculture with high
requirements in very expensive imported inputs (improved seeds, fertilizers, insecticides,
herbicides and tractors...) as well as overall, bad governance. Bad governance ultimately,
results in lack of financial support for poor populations and particularly smallholder farmers
who have withhold participating in food security problem solving.
There are many reasons that have been put forward suggesting how the DRC landed in this
dilemma. Cited reasons typically include trade policies adverse to local production, the
practices of some leaders who have been more concerned with personal enrichment as
opposed to the common good and short-term profit seeking from policy-driven investments
while food security remains at the periphery (Trefon, 2009).
2.1. Current status of food Security in Kinshasa:
DRC/Congo is still recovering from years of war and political upheaval, and continues to face
significant humanitarian challenges. About 70% of the population do not have access to
adequate food, while 1 out of 4 children is malnourished (WFP, 2012). Based on the recent
Integrated Food Security Phase classification carried out by the (IPC), about 6.4 million
people are facing food insecurity and livelihood crises and, require food and agricultural
assistance (IPC, 2012). In the dawn of climate variability, the situation may further
deteriorate if urgent sustainable food security strategies are not introduced in Kinshasa,
Congo (DRC) (MICS, 2010). This therefore gives a basis for the introduction of Permaculture
designs combined with new technologies, at the smallholder farmers’ level in Kinshasa, as
an alternative solution towards attaining sustainable agricultural production aiming to
achieve food security.
2.2. Food security and climate change:
Climate change is predicted to cause a 3-4 C temperature rise and an increase in severe
weather events in Kinshasa (Naidu, Hounsome and Iyer, 2006). Climate change is expected
to negatively affect existing levels of urban food security and these are likely to fall
disproportionately on the poor (Ziervogel and Frayne, 2011). The effects of climate
variability are impacting negatively on all aspects of food security and therefore opening the
door to urban food security crises. Minor changes in climate will push most households in
Kinshasa to food insecurity problems. People in Kinshasa are currently facing new threats
beyond their experience or coping capacity. In addition to local effects, agricultural losses in
Congo, DRC, will translate into macro-economic crises that will exacerbate problems of food
access for the urban poor of Kinshasa. Negative impacts of climate variability will push up
local food prices, seriously affecting all consumers, rich but mostly the poor. Climate
induced problems will also be exacerbated by changes in consumption patterns (for
example eating more insects than meat, frequenting more farmers market than

5
supermarket), urbanisation and land use conversion. One of the most visible consequences
of food shortages currently are the malnutrition rates in children under five in areas
experiencing growth in the number of infants being born in Kinshasa where: 34 out of every
100 children weigh less than normal for their age.
According to the above information, there is a need for a paradigm shift from the current
agricultural practices, in Kinshasa, to Permaculture design practices that are backed by
extensive research. The absence of proper measures and alternatives strategies, in food
production exposes the current way of growing food to the drastic effects of climate
variability factors. Permaculture practices are new concepts currently being introduced to
Kinshasa, Congo (DRC). This approach to farming poses as a potentially interesting scenario
within which to investigate how smallholder farmers will adapt to climate variability factors
and at the same time, how these adaptive strategies will help in the improvement of food
production? The main thrust of this research is to investigate an alternative approach to
increasing food security in Kinshasa by using Permaculture as an adaptive strategy against
climate variability in Kinshasa, Congo (DRC).
3. Research Questions
In view of the above observations, the following questions will guide the research process:
1. In what ways can Permaculture be used as a viable tool toward promoting food security
in the context of climate variability in Kinshasa, the Capital City of the Congo (DRC)?
2. What institutional frameworks exist within which Permaculture can be offered as a
viable-alternative live hood source in Kinshasa?
3. In what ways can Permaculture contribute to a social and economic development in
Kinshasa?
4. What are the implications of the finding of this study in a wilder context and particularly
in Sub- Saharan African countries?
4.-Research Aims and objectives
The aim of this study is to investigate the ways in which Permaculture can be used as an
adaptive strategy to mitigate food insecurity arising from the impacts of climate variability
in Kinshasa, Congo (DRC).
In view of the above aim the objectives are as follow:
I) To analyze mechanisms that can enhance Permaculture in the areas of water,
agriculture, forestry, and edible insects farming at household level.
II) To examine the effectiveness of Permaculture in promoting a new agricultural
system that can be used in response to food insecurity problems at household
levels in Kinshasa.
III) To understand and identify indigenous knowledge systems compatible with
Permaculture in mitigating and adapting to climate change.

6
5.-Theoretical and literature review considerations
5.1. Introduction
Since urbanization and food security are two of the biggest environmental events of the
21st. Century, interest continues to grow towards ecosystem based approaches to
addressing food security and climate change adaptation. Several studies have
demonstrated the potential of ecological ways in enhancing food security issues including,
agroforestry and conservation agriculture, Permaculture and eco-agriculture, low input
agriculture and organic ways of growing food. In Cuba there has been significant progress
made towards food security for all. In Malawi and Zimbabwe yields have significantly
increased when smallholder farmers adopted Permaculture (AAKNET. 2013).
5.2. History of Permaculture
Permaculture as a coherent and explicit set of design principles arose from a collaborative
effort in the early 1970s between Bill Mollison, a senior lecturer in Environmental
Psychology at the University of Tasmania, and his student, David Holmgren. Much of the
impetus for this collaboration arose from concern with impending peak oil consumption, the
increasingly evident environmental consequences of western production and consumption
patterns (Holmgren, 2003). In 1976 the pair published an article about Permaculture in the
Tasmanian magazine Organic Farmer and Gardener. This article generated considerable
interest from the public and media and based on this Mollison and Holmgren began to tour
and talk about their holistic design system based on the following 12 design principles: 1.-
Observe and interact, 2. -Catch and store energy, 3. Obtain a yield, 4. Produce no waste,
5.-Apply self-regulation and accept feedback, 6. Use and value renewable resources and
services, 7.-Deesign from patterns to details, 8. -Integrate rather than segregate, 9. -Use
small and slow solutions, 10.-Use and value diversity, 11. -Use edges and values the
marginal, 12. -Creatively use and respond to change (Holmgren, 2004: 7-18).
Four years later, in 1978, following Mollison and Holmgren’s successful touring, the seminar
book Permaculture One was published. The diffusion of Permaculture has been remarkable
in its speed and breadth; by the mid-1980s ten Australian Permaculture groups had grown
to over 80 international organisations (Grayson & Payne, 2007). Today Permaculture has
become a global movement with over 400.000 projects in place and over 1 Million people
trained in the Permaculture Design Course (PDC). The introductory courses outline the
principles of Permaculture, ethics, and design principles, and in a broader sense detail and
demonstrates, typically through hands-on student experience, a number of organic farming
techniques (Ayesh, 2005).
5.3. The Permaculture Approach
Permaculture comes from the words permanent, agriculture, and culture embedded in
agriculture. Permaculture is a life style of farming and gardening that mimics nature. The
farmer co-operates with nature, cares for the environment and in return the environmental
cares for him. This system is based on the use of available local resources as opposed to
using resources imported from elsewhere. Permaculture systems are designed by, -
incorporating local resources to produce new components that will benefit all members of
the ecosystem. In the Permaculture context; designing means “joining systematically the
different elements and resources (water, soil, plants, insects and animals) together”
(Munthali et al., 2008 pages) for a mutual benefit. Permaculture necessitates the use of

7
ecological anthropology approaches because Permaculture design involves re-imagining
one’s concepts of, and relationship to, nature (Katz, 1998). Work on indigenous ecological
and agricultural knowledge, including symbolic systems, is particularly relevant in
investigating how these knowledge systems impact on the adoption of agricultural
technologies and practices as well as climate change (Shipton, 1994; Morris, 1998; Sheridan,
2002). As stated earlier, Permaculture acknowledges indigenous knowledge and traditional
ways of farming.
5.4. Indigenous agriculture (IA)
Indigenous agriculture (IA) also called traditional agriculture (TA) improves management of
the agro-ecosystem by the application of three basic principles namely, minimum soil
disturbance, permanent soil cover and diversified crop associations and rotations, (FAO,
2010; MOAIWD, 2012). These principles of Indigenous agriculture are interrelated with
those of Permaculture which include: care of the earth, care of people, sharing with others
as well as setting limits to consumption and population growth (Mollison, 1979). Traditional
Agriculture is often associated with reduced or zero tillage practices. The promoters of TA
also employ different approaches to reach targeted farmers with education (extension)
messages. A recent report by MOWAID, (2012) shows that promoters use Extension
Workers (23.4%), lead Farmer approach (18.5%) and demonstration sites approach (18.5%),
Farmer Field School/Farmer to Farmer approaches (16.6%) and Field days/educational visits
approach (15.0%) in educating farmers. Since both traditional agriculture and Permaculture
serve as strategies for sustainable agriculture, the assumption is that strategies used in
traditional agriculture promotion could potentially work for Permaculture introduction in
Kinshasa. Nevertheless, it is interesting to know how the promoters of Permaculture are
progressing and whether their efforts have been successful. Permaculture has been recently
introduced in Kinshasa, by this research but traditional agriculture was practiced by
Congolese for fathers’ years before the colonial era (INERA, 2012) and in still in practice in
the country side and rural areas in Congo (DRC).
This study will show how Permaculture is making inroads in farming systems in the DRC.
Recommendations will be deduced on how to carry out future interventions, considering
that Permaculture has been there longer than modern agriculture has, but there seems to
be a stronger bias towards the promotion of modern agriculture. As stated earlier: -the
government of Congo, Kinshasa is committed to using traditional knowledge and practices
in the fight against climate change. Traditional activities and ceremonies often have links to
environment and climate change and take into account the history of the area, attitudes,
perceptions, practices and relationships of the people to the environment and climate
change variability. e.g.: ancestral invocation by songs and dances has been used to depict
existing environmental problems and explore possible solutions in a variety of ways (INERA,
2012).
5.5. Permaculture Ethics
Holmgren (2004:1) defines Permaculture as: consciously designed landscapes which mimic
the patterns and relationships found in nature while yielding and abundance of food, fibre
and energy for provision of local needs. Holmgren elaborates on this definition by,
explaining that people, their buildings and the ways in which they organise themselves are
central to Permaculture. Thus, the Permaculture vision of permanent or sustainable

8
agriculture has evolved to that of permanent or sustainable culture (2004:1). Similarly,
since inception, 3 ethical underpinning tenets of Permaculture have been explicated:
i) Care for the Earth,
ii) Care for people,
iii) Faire share (Morrow, 2006: 11).
From the above, there emerges then, a set of key concepts integral to Permaculture and
these are: people, nature, culture, context, permanence, and provision of needs, design,
learning and equity. In essence, Permaculture is a set of design and ethical principles that
extend beyond the boundaries of food production and to some degree may be considered
an applied philosophy and, as such, a focal point for identity and action with an explicit
definition, vision and blueprint for sustainable self-provisioning of food underpinned by
ethics of equity and care for people and the planet.
5.6. Impacts of climate change on smallholders farmers
A climate change impact potentially significant to smallholder farm production is loss of soil
organic matter due to soil warming. Higher air temperatures are likely to speed the natural
decomposition of organic matter and to increase the rates of other soil processes that affect
fertility. Under drier soil conditions, root growth and decomposition of organic matter are
significantly suppressed, and as soil cover diminishes, vulnerability to wind erosion
increases, especially if wind intensify. In some areas, an expected increase in convective
rainfall- caused by stronger gradients of temperature and pressure and more atmospheric
moisture- will result in heavier rainfall, which will cause severe soil erosion (Miguel A., and
Parviz K., (2008). The possible impacts of climate change on agriculture, forestry and
ecosystems in Africa can be summarised as:
a) –By 2025, approximately 480 million people in Africa will be living in water-scarce or
water stress areas.
b) –By 2020, in some countries, mainly in the Congo DRC, yields from rain-fed
agriculture will be reduced by up to 50%. Agricultural production, including access to
food, in many African countries, mainly in the Congo DRC, is projected to be severely
compromised. This would further adversely affect food security and exacerbate
malnutrition in Kinshasa, Congo (DRC).
The possible increases in pest and disease infestations will bring about greater use of
chemical pesticides to control them, a situation that will enhance production costs and also
increase environmental problems associated with agrochemical use. Of course this will not
be the case with farmers who use Permaculture design approaches based on polycultures,
agroforestry or other forms of diversified cropping systems that prevent insect pest build-up
either because of one crop will be planted as a diversionary host, protecting other, more
susceptible or more economically valuable crops from serious damage, or because crops
grown simultaneously enhance the abundance of predators and parasites wish provide
biological suppression of pest densities (Altieri and Nicholls, 2004).
This section of literature review demonstrates how several studies assert that Permaculture
can be used as an ecosystem based approach to food security and as an adaptive strategy
against climate change, (variability).

9
6. Research knowledge gap and Relevance of study
There is no academic research on Permaculture as an adaptive strategy against climate variability in
Kinshasa, Congo (DRC). As we know: “Permaculture has been under-studied and therefore under-
theorized in social sciences generally” (Veteto and Lockyer, 2008:49-54). While there are many
studies on agricultural productivity, food security and the environment, but there is a gap in the
research about the “dynamic tension between behaviour and the environmental conditions around
us” (Yakah, J.A., 2012). As one of the first studies on the relationship of Permaculture and climate
change in Kinshasa (DRC), this study will draw a direct link between food security and environmental
conditions that fuel rapid climatic changes (Metzger et al., (2006). Not much is known and or
documented on how farmers used to forecast weather conditions in the absence of the present
technologies. Such knowledge may be found in traditional or indigenous agriculture. If tapped
would be relevant to draw lessons from and used to inform practices that can help farmers
understand the climate change story. This research will significantly contribute to the small body of
literature on Permaculture by adding knowledge about Permaculture impact on adaptation of
climate variability. Empirically, this study will contribute to existing literature through needed
ethnographic documentation of the implementation of Permaculture, and its impacts on the effects
of climate change on agriculture, water, fisheries and forestry. Theoretically, this project will
contribute to sociological theories of Permaculture and the relationship it has with climate variability
within the context of food security in Kinshasa.
7.-Methodological considerations
The purpose of this section is to explain how the research will be conducted. This research is
divided into sections as follows: the philosophical context, research design, interviews and
focus groups discussions, smallholder farmer’s livelihood approach to food security,
description of the study sites, data collection and analysis. The successive sections will
stipulate the challenges and limitations that might be encountered during the study. The
research will be conducted with the participation of agricultural NGOs.
7.1. Philosophical context
Based on the philosophical assumption adopted, research can be classified as positive,
interpretive and critical (Venkatesh et al., 2013). The meaning of interpretive approaches is
that knowledge of reality is gained only through social constructions (Walsham, 2006).
Those who support the interpretive approach, claim that social phenomena must be
understood in the social context within which they are constructed and reproduced through
their activities. In other words, the understanding of social action must include the meaning
that social actors give to their deeds (performance/actions). The research strategy adopted
in this study is to conduct cultivation demonstration based on Permaculture
implementation. Drawing from this training initiative, smallholder farmers groups will be
shown, how Permaculture actions impact on food security in Kinshasa and ultimately reduce
the negative effects of farming activities on the environment. The researcher assumes that
the issues of food security and climate variability in Kinshasa remain a subjective reality that
needs to be investigated, discovered and constructed through Permaculture design
demonstration approaches. In addition, this study will also adopt a methodological
openness to various academic influences, but the focus will be on qualitative and action
research. It is also called “hands on approach” or “simply learning to do by doing”.
Therefore, a combination of both, quantitative and qualitative research is recommended
and incorporated in the data collection and analysis.

10
7.2. Research design
This research will use both sociological research methods (quantitative and qualitative) and
Permaculture agricultural experimental design. Permaculture training and education will be
done through 3 demonstrative cultivation systems or gardens that will be established on
each county. Planting will be carried out from Permaculture design learned approaches,
during 3 seasons: that means all year around as follow: B season of 2015 (From April to June
2015), C season of 2015 (from end of June to September, 2015) and A season of 2016 (from
September, 2015 to January, 2016). Temperature, rainfall and humidity figures for the past
10-20 years for three (3) selected counties will be obtained from the Congo, (DRC), weather
Services. Data on crops yield, tons, production and percentage area planted for the past 10-
20 years will be obtained from the Minister of Agriculture, Fishery and animal production.
Permission will also be sought from the three county offices to conduct interviews
(research) in their different municipalities. The Counties for the survey were selected based
on the following criteria:
A) Food security status (Chronic, transitory, stable) of the district, based on the
categorization in a 2010 study on food security (Fewsnet, 2010).
B) Geographical location by Kinshasa region, to ensure the sample was county
representative.
C) Agricultural and agro-ecological zones within which the counties are located, to capture
the different farming systems in the county.
Random sampling will be used to select 30 farmers to be interviewed. To keep the
experiment standardized, we will move our operators (Permaculture growing system=
Permaculture garden) to be established in each county: Ndjili, Masina, and Kinkole.
This might be laid out as follows: C= Control as traditional agricultural production, A,B,D, E,F,
G= variables of Permaculture design practices production, climate variability factors
combine with adaptive strategy, (composting, mulching, no-tilling, crops mixing, animals
and insects farming).
Before the interviews start a village meeting will be conducted with all community
representatives present is: chiefs, local councillors and NGO’s. The nature of the research
and contents of the questionnaire will be clearly explained to all of them. Focus group
discussion will also be conducted after individual interviews with farmers. Three
coordinators comprised one from each county will be chosen and trained to assist in the
research.

11
7.3. Interviews and Focus group discussions
The second central component of the climate change (variability) research will be conducted
through interviews and focus groups discussions. This portion of the research will provide
critical information that elaborates on, contextualize, and adds to the quantitative
information. Focus groups and open ended interviews will be used to explore the
respondent’s perceptions of proper rainfall patterns, healthy soils available for vegetation as
well as surface water bodies, and how their perceptions are related to their food production
practices and vice versa. Open ended interviews will aid in exploring personal and
community understandings of climate variability, and the impact that climate change has on
their own and their families’ experience of hunger and food security.
Smallholder farmer’s livelihoods approach to food security
According to Ellis, (2000), a working definition of livelihoods is: “… the assets (natural,
physical, human, financial and social capital), the activities, and the access to these
(mediated by institutions and social relations) that together determine the living gained by
the individual or household”.
The smallholder farmers selected for this study will be specially chosen from the sustainable
livelihoods approach (SLA) developed by DFID. The SLA provides a lens for analysing how
people go about maintaining a livelihood. It helps in analysing how people combine the
different assets they have access in order to pursue activities towards attaining a livelihood
objective, within the food security, climate variability and Permaculture context within
which they are embedded. The SLA is a multi-sectorial approach that allows taking into
account the multidimensionality of factors that determine food security. It provides a way of
looking at the fact that household food security is determined by household-level factors
such as the household’s food production but also by macro-level factors such as inflation,
devaluation, changes in world markets to cite a few. In this way, the appropriate type and
best level of interventions for improving food security can be identified. Therefore,
Permaculture design and participatory principles underlying the SLA mean that through its
implementation at all different stakeholder’s levels, including those whose food security is
being analysed, are included in the analysis. This will contributes to increasing the
ownership and accuracy of findings and thereby the success of the Permaculture
introduction as intervention.
7.4. Data Analysis
As has been stated, qualitative and quantitative research technique will be used to gather
the data. These insights will deepen the understanding of food security in a changing
climate: exploring the potential of Permaculture as an adaptive strategy against climate
variability in Kinshasa.
Quantitative data
This section will focus on various observational techniques and instruments of data
collection that will be used in each phase: (Sociological phase and climate variability
observations phase and Permaculture learning and practices phase) of the research process
at each selected county of Kinshasa. As Permaculture being introduce for the first time in
Kinshasa, training will be mandatory. The training will start with two weeks courses on
Permaculture design and ethics. Farmers will learn hands-on the art and science of

12
mimicking nature, soil building, and planting a demonstration garden. Guest instructors will
teach native healing and mushroom cultivation and usage, as well as insects farming.
Farmers will receive a Permaculture design certificate. Each trained smallholder farmer will
practice Permaculture on his or her farm and quantitative data will be collected: soil
preparation, composting, planting, mulching, rain water management. Statistical
instruments will be used as a tool to compute, treat and analyse data. Several statistical
models of causal explanation between independent and dependent variables will also be
used such as coefficient of variances.
Qualitative data
In this process the researcher will apply content analysis which refers to analysis of the
contents of an interview in order to identify the main responses given by the respondents.
In this way, in-depth information will be collected through the focus group session and
primary data gathered through informal and semi-structured interviews will be subjected to
content analysis. The insights will clarify the understanding of food security in a changing
climate thereby: Exploring the potential of Permaculture as an adaptive strategy against
climate variability in Kinshasa.
7.5. Description of the study sites
Kinshasa is the political capital of the Democratic Republic of the Congo and is located
between 4 ° and 5 ° south and between 15 ° and 17 ° east, is the largest city in the Democratic
Republic of Congo. It covers an area of 9965 km2 (Lelo Nzuzi, 2008) and, only about 600
km2 being urbanized. The city had 500,000 inhabitants in 1960 and reached more than 6.5
million in 2008, meaning the average annual growth rate between 1960 and 2003 would
therefore be about 6.80% (Nzuzi, L. 2008). Later statistics show the urban population is
estimated at 12.7 (Nsokimieno, 2010). Kinshasa has grown in the plains bordering the Congo
River. This is the most industrialized area and formerly the most densely inhabited,
commonly called the “ville basse” (low city). After independence in 1960, the city has spread
into the complex hills surrounding the city and low peaks around 600 m above sea level.
Slums, mainly occupy this area. Figure1 below presents the map of Kinshasa including the
three sites (Ndjili, Masina and Kinkole) where the research will be conducted.
As shown in Fig.1, the study will be focused on the three local municipalities of Kinshasa
namely “Ndjili, Masina, and Kinkole”. Poverty and unemployment are taking center stage in
Kinshasa thus becoming a growing concern. The state, the principal provider has abrogated
its responsibilities and has denied the Congolese people the right to lead the life they are
entitled to (Iyenda, 2005). This situation can be regarded as a failed state that has led the
country to many environmental problems, coupled with the armed conflict as well as the
constant insecurity in the Eastern part of the country. This situation has resulted in the
immigration of displaced people at an alarming rate. Millions of people have been displaced
from their homes to neighboring countries, and thousands of them arrived in Kinshasa to
escape the war (Misilu, et al, 2010). This mobility from the Eastern part to Kinshasa leads to
the city’s unstable growth and does not correspond with the socio-economic conditions.
Kinshasa is already overpopulated and this rapid and ungoverned increase, is affecting the
dominant form of the city. This lack of proper regulation and governance produces conditions
of large-scale uncontrolled urban sprawl and affects the use of land. The growth in Kinshasa
has become virtually synonymous with the city’s deterioration, which has caused the loss of
open spaces, poverty, slums growth, and subsequently, deteriorated the existing food security
infrastructure (Misilu, et al, 2010).

13
Ndjili is one of the 24 communes of Kinshasa where interviews will be conducted. It is
primarily an informal settlement and has nearly 270.000 inhabitants and a population density
of 15,000 inhabitants/km2 inhabitants. More than 60 per cent of the people in Ndjili are poor,
while 80 per cent are unemployed and many youth are disaffected (Katsongo, 2012). It is
estimated that the majority (about 70%) of the Ndjili population is comprised of young
people aged between 15 and 30 years. They are jobless and involved in livelihood activities
on the streets. They face multiple challenges associated with unhealthy living conditions
resulting from local environments characterized by a complex of interrelated risks. Masina is
also one of the 24 communes of Kinshasa. Masina is known as a low-income class. More
than 60 per cent of the people in Masina are either employed by the public sector, and/or
working with the private sector. Masina is comprised of the people of the ages between 30
and 65 years old (Katsongo, 2012). Within Masina, food security is serious problem. Finally,
Kinkole is the tourist hub per- urban neighborhoods of Kinshasa where most of fisherman
and farmers live. It has nearly 68, 135 inhabitants with a population density of 500
inhabitants/km2. This is relatively a food secure and climate stable per-urban environment in
Kinshasa. These three areas were chosen to analyze the extent to which food security can be
realized in a changing climate and to explore the potential of Permaculture as an adaptive
strategy against climate variability in Kinshasa according to food security levels and
locations.
Questionnaires
Given the particularity and the distinctiveness of the study design, it will be very important
to construct three standardized questionnaires with core questions that will be relevant to
the entire population of the study. The first one; will be administered to the grassroots
communities, the second one; will be directed to the Permaculture trained farmers and
finally, the last one; will be for the formal and informal food security authorities. (See
attached Sample questions pages: 22-23).
7.6. -Scope and limitations of the research
The following are some of the potential limitations that might encountered during the study
period that will affect the research in one way or another.
a. Financial Limitation
Due to the fact that I do not have financial support (scholarship), I therefore have to rely on
my own limited resources to meet the cost of the entire fieldwork exercise including travel
and accommodation, printing and photocopying of research instruments and other
documents, payments at various offices and remuneration for my field assistants. Another
limitation of this research is related to the techniques to be employed in the analysis of the
data, which will not provide sophisticated statistical analysis of the household questionnaire
data. This is, however, due to the nature of the research design, which is qualitative and
largely quantitative.

14
Figure 1: Map of Kinshasa, 2005
b. Time limitation
The study will be conducted within a year and this period will be divided into 3 cultivating
seasons (A, B, and C). During this period there will be collection of necessary data and
pictures that will aid in illustrating some vital information to present in this study.
Comparative pictures will be required to show how study areas appear in different seasons
of the year.
c. Geographical locations limitations
Areas under the study of Permaculture and traditional agriculture will be located in different
counties (Masina, Kisenso, and Kinkole) in Kinshasa. The Permaculture program will not be
side by side with the traditional agriculture projects but at certain distance from one district
to another. As a result, it will not be easy for the researchers to conduct participant
observations and more ethnographic studies with the small-farmers under the traditional
agriculture.
8. Ethical considerations
A number of ethical issues will be addressed in the course of the research including
informed consent, access and acceptance, confidentiality and anonymity. With regard to
consent, Robson’s, (1993) has advised that “whenever possible, the investigator should
inform all participants of the objectives of the investigation and all aspects of the research

15
or intervention that might reasonably be expected to influence willingness to participate”.
In the conduct of this research, the principle of informed consent will be given the required
attention by explaining the purpose of the study to participants and making them aware
that participation is optional and they can choose to answer or not answer any questions in
the course of the interview. All participants will sign a consent form and participants
information protection sheet.
9. Proposed dissertation outline:
I intend to structure my thesis as a series of six papers or chapters modified from journal
articles that will be published.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
CHAPTER 1: or the first paper will review existing literature on how Permaculture as an
adaptive strategy against climate variability and food security will emerge at a range of
scales, from the global to the local spheres, in Kinshasa. I will aim to explain the benefits of
the introduction of Permaculture practices in Kinshasa socio-economic livelihood. I hope to
learn from my proposed field experiments that they can be complementary benefit
between population growth and food production when thought fully design.
CHAPTER 2: or the second paper will discuss the methods and field experimental used in
this research before addressing; how can Permaculture design approaches applied in food
production in Kinshasa’s smallholder farmers’ level, help to improve environmental decay
and the treat of food insecurity as consequences of rapid urban population growth and in
the context of climate change in Kinshasa, the Capital City of the Congo (DRC). Detailed data
from the experimental field will be significant for evaluating Permaculture as an adaptive
strategy against climate variability in Kinshasa.
CHAPTER 3: or the third paper will be focused on the institutional framework that exists
within whish Permaculture system can be pursued as an alternative live hood source in
Kinshasa. It is vital to understand the environmental framework favourable to further
develop this research. That means: A framework with which to assess the impacts of
climate change and climate variability on food and nutrition security and to review current
research and projects that identify adaptation strategies will be most appropriate for food
and nutrition security.
CHAPTER 4: or the fourth paper, will argue in what ways Permaculture can contribute to a
social-economic livelihood and food security in Kinshasa. In addition, I hope to investigate
possibility of establishing domestic insects farming, mushroom production and fish farming
as new source of proteins and income at smallholder farmers’ level in Kinshasa despite
gardening and agriculture food production. Historically, cities have been engines of
economic growth, offering abundant opportunities for employment and access to services.
But over 50 years after the independence era, the rapid urbanization in today’s Sub-Saharan
Africa offers a different hard reality. The majority of urban dwellers work in the informal

16
sector, once characterized by sporadic and uncertain employment and a lack of access to
government services (William Garvelink, 2014).
CHAPTER 5: or the fifth paper will explain the implications of the findings of this study in a
wilder context and particularly in Sub-Saharan African Countries. The Congo (DRC) being the
biggest Country in Southern part of Africa, I will present the findings that reflect similarities
implementations’ with other countries. Because 72 percent of Sub-Saharan Africa’s urban
population lives with little to no access to basic food, government services, low employment
and wages and all countries are dwindling nutrition (William, G., 2014).
CHAPTER 6: or the sixth paper will synthesize and discuss the findings presented from
different papers, and finally it will conclude the discussions and provide recommendations.
APPENDIX
REFERENCES
10. TIMETABLE: PROPOSED SCHEDULE
Milestones
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3
2015 2016 2017
J A J O J A J O J A J O
F M A N F M A N F M A N
M J S D M J S D M J S D
Phase I: Project Development
Preliminary scan & literature review
Problem statement, aims, objectives and questions
Theoretical framework and literature review
Compile Study Region and Methodology
Delimitations of study, ethical considerations, structure and timeframe
of the study
Present research proposal
Submit research proposal
Phase 2: Data Collection and Analysis
Fieldwork (data collection/conduct interviews)
Extracting and compiling information from the questionnaires
Data capturing and editing
Data analysis, synthesis and interpretations
Phase 3: Writing and publishing papers
Paper 1
Paper 2
Paper 3
Paper 4
Assembling the papers and submitting the final thesis

17
Attachment 1: Questionnaire at the householder level.
See below an example of structured questionnaire at the householder level:
Objective: to obtain general information on food access and utilization and Permaculture.
14. Questions:
0. Your name, please. (Voluntarily)
1. What is your sex Please?
-Female
-Male
2. What is your household size?
-1-5
-5-10
-10-15
3. What sources of energy do you use?
-Hydro (electricity)
-Solar
-Firewood
4. How many school going children do you have?
-Primary
-Secondary
-Thirstily
-University
6. What is the source of your food?
-Your garden
-Market
-Food aid
-Gather from the bush
7. What do you do for a livelihood?
-agro pastoralist
-Trader
-Unemployed
-agriculture

18
8. Is water available throughout the year?
-Yes
-No
9. How many times do you have a meal in a day?
-Once
-Twice
 -Thrice
10. What is your typical meal for dinner and what are the components?
-Fufu and beans
-Fufu, Beans and Vegetables
-Fufu, Beans, Vegetables and beef, Fish, Insects (Meat)
11. What is your relationship with your neighbour?
-Good
-Bad
12. What do you think is the solution to the household food access and
utilization?
-Permaculture
-Continued food aid
-Helping farmer
13. How many dependants do you have?
-1-4
-5-10
14. How do you cook your food?
-Fufu
-Vegetables
-Meat
15. What do you do after eating for good digestion?
-Dessert
-Fruits
-Bottle water
-Rest

19
References:
1. Afristar Foundation, 2012: About Permaculture [Online].
Available:http://www.afristar.org.za/content.asp?icphid=32&icat=4 (Accessed 20
April, 2012].
2. African Union., 2006: Status of food security and prospects for agricultural
development in Africa. African Union, Addis Ababa.
3. Altieri MA., 2004: Linking ecologists and traditional farmers in the research for
sustainable agriculture. Front Ecol Environ 2:35-42.
4. Altieri MA, Toledo VM., 2011: The agro ecological revolution in Latin America:
rescuing nature, ensuring food sovereignty and empowering peasants. J Peasant Stud
38:587-612.
5. Ajayi ali MT., 2008: Effects of spacing/number per stand and fertilizer placement on
performance of two maize varieties intercropped with cowpea in the forest zone of
Nigeria. Ghana J Agric. Sci 20:39-46.
6. Ayesh, M., 2005: Use of Permaculture under salinity and drought conditions.
Retrieved 5/3/10 from: http://permaculture.org.au/2005/02/01use-of-permaculture-
under-salinity-and-drought-conditions/#more-258
7. Barley, A., Nyika. M.W., 2010: More and Better Food: Farming, climate change,
health and the Aids epidemic. Oxford, UK.
8. Bernard, H. Russell., 2006: Research Methods in Anthropology: Qualitative and
quantitative Approaches, Lanham, Altamira Press.
9. Boko, M., et al., 2007: “Africa”, In P. Van der Linden et al., (eds); climate change
2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of working group II to the
fouth assessment report of the intergovernmental panal on climate (Cambrige:
Cambrige University Press, (2007): pp.433-67.
10. Christoplos, I., 2010: Mobilizing the potential of rural and Agricultural extension.
Danish Institute for International Studies. Food and Agriculture Organization of the
United Nations. Office of knowledge exchange, Research and extension. The global
Forum for Rural advisory services. Rome 2010.
11. Conarad, A., 2011: Women’s roles: Agriculture, Food, and nutrition in rural central
Malawi. American University Robyn Rafferty Mathias Student Research Conference,
Washington, D.C.
12. Holmgren, D., 2002: Permaculture principles & Pathways beyond sustainability,
2nd
.edition, Holmgren design services, Victoria, Australia, P.286.

20
13. Holmgren, D., 2003): Permaculture: principles and pathways beyond sustainability.
Holmgren design services, Victoria, Australia.
14. Dequeker, Paul & Mudiji Malamba Gilombe, (1984). Eglises tropicales, Kinshasa:
Eds. C.E.P.
15. Department of Agriculyure (DOA), (2002): The integrated Food Security Strategy for
South Africa.
16. Dove, M. Carol, and Carpenter, (2008): Introduction: major Historical currents in
Environmental Anthropology. Pp 1-86, Blackwell Publishing.
17. FAO. 2006: Food Security. Policy Brief, FAO, Rome.
18. FAO. 2006a: developing institutions and options for livelihood adaptation to climate
variability and change in drought-prone areas of Bangladesh. Project DP9/1-
BGD/01/004/01/99: Improved adaptive Capacity to climate Change for Sustainable
Livelihoods in the Agriculture Sector.
19. FAO. 2007f: National Programmes for Food Security: FAO’s vision of a world
without hunger. Rome.
20. FAO. 2007g: The state of food and agriculture 2007: Paying farmers for environmental
services. Rome.
21. FAO. 2008: Securite alimentaire dans un context de crise prolongee: Que peut-on
faire? Note d’orientation, http:ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/011/ak057/f00.pdf (accessed on
25/1/2012 )
22. FAO. 2008: Expert Meeting on Global Perspectives on fuel and Food Security:
Technical Report. 18-20 February 2008. Rome.
23. FAO. 2010: http://www.fao.org/docrep/003/il683e/il683e.pdf-WFPorg/FAO-The state
of food insecurity in the world 2010-addressing food insecurity in protracted crises-
FAO, 2010.
24. FEWS NET, 2009: Tanzania Food Security Report. Tanzania Publishing House,
Dares es Salaam, Tanzania. 19pp.
25. Fullerton, Garry, 1964: UNESCO in the Congo, Paris: UNESCO
26. IFPRI, 2012: http://www.foodsecurityportal.org/dr-congo? Print.
27. Gina Ziervogel and Bruce, Frayne, (2011): “Climate change and Food Security in
Southern African Cities”. Urban food Security No. # 8. Queen’s University and
AFSUN: Kingston and CapeTown.

21
28. Gina Ziervogel and F. Zermoglio, 2009: “Climate Change Scenarios and the
Development of adaption strategies in Africa: Challenges and opportunities” Climate
research 40 (2-3): 133-146)
29. Giyose, N., 2004: Agriculture key at climate Talks. [Online]. Gauteng Department of
Agriculture and Rural Development (GDARD). Available:
http://www.gdard.gpg.gov.za/NewsArticle_36_2011.htm [Accessed 8 April, 2012].
30. Grayson, R. & Payne, S., 2007: Tasmanian Roots. New Internationalist, 402, pp. 10-
11.
31. Holmgren, D., 2003: Permaculture: Principles and Pathways beyond Sustainability.
Hepburn, Vic: Holmgren design Press.
32. Holmgren, D., 2004: Essence of Permaculture. Hepburn, Vic: Holmgren design Press.
33. Lebailly Ph. 2010: Cinquante annees de dependence alimentaire en RDC: situation et
perspectives, http://hdl.handle.net/2268/74168 (accessed on 25/1/2012)
34. Le Potentiel, Fernand Tala-Ngai n’est plus, Kinshasa, 16 Fevrier, 2006:
35. Makabu Kenda T., 2005: L’organisation de la collecte des donnees de l’enquete 1-2-3
de Kinshasa, RDC, STATECO, N0. 99, 143-154.
36. M. BOKOer et al., 2007: “Africa”, in P. Van der Linken et al., (Eds) Climate Change,
2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of work groupie to the
fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on climate change
(Cambridge University press: pp.433-68.
37. Mertz, O., et al., 2007: Ecosystem services and biodiversity in developing countries.
“Biodivers. Conserv. 16 (10), 2729-2737.
38. MICS,2010:http://www.childinfo.org/files/MICSRDC_2010_Preliminary_results_final
_EN_imprime.pdf.
39. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005: Ecosystems and human well-being:
Washington DC, Island Press for WIR.
40. Mollison, B. and Holmgren, D., 1978: Permaculture One: A Perennial Agriculture for
human settlements. Sisters Creek, TAS: Targari Publications.
41. Mollison, B., 1979: Permaculture Two: Practical Design and further theory in
Permaculture Agriculture. Tasmania: Targari.
42. Mollison, B., 1981: Acceptance speech at the Right livelihoods award ceremony.
Retrieved 12/4/11 from: http://www.rightlivelihood.org/mollison.html
43. Mollison, B., 1988: Permaculture: A Designer’s Manual. Tasmania: tagari. Pp15, 19,
36, 55, 70, 78-79, 138-139, 149-150, 174-175, 185.

22
44. Mollison, B., 1991: Introduction to Permaculture. Targari Publications, Tyalgum.
45. Morris, K., Nelson, T. & Ostry, A. (2011): Methods for mapping local food production
capacity from Agricultural Statistics. Agricultural Systems 104: 491-499.
46. Morrow, R., 2006: Earth User’s guide to Permaculture (2nd
ed.). East Roseville, NSW:
Simon and Schuster Ltd.
47. Naidu, S., Hounsome, R. and Iyer, K., 2006: Climate future for Durban: Revised
Report. Prepared for: EThekwini Municipality by: CSIR Environmentek.
48. PNUD, 2009: Province de Kinshasa, Profil resume. Pauvrete et conditions de vie des
ménages, htt://www.cd.und.org/Downloads/profil_Kinshasa_Final.pdf (accessed on
25/1/2012).
49. PIJ., 1999: Permaculture International Journal: 21st
. Birthday Edition- Sustainable
solutions from the city to the wilderness. Issue No: 72 Sept-Nov. 1999.
50. PNIA, 2013: Ministry of Agriculture “Plan national d’investissement agricole (PNIA),
2013-2020 p.5
51. Rossi, D., 2012: Cultivating the City, a Multifunctional Landscape along the Walker
Spruit, Pretoria. Master’s dissertationin Landscape Architecture. University of
Pretoria. [Online]. Available: http://upetd.up.ac.za/ETD-db/ETD-search/search
[accessed 12 April, 2013.]
52. Schmidt, D., 1998: Are all species equal? Journal of applied Philosophy, 15, pp. 57-67.
53. Schmidt, D and Willott, E. (2002): Why environmental ethics? New York:, NY:
Oxford University Press, Inc.
54. Shipton, P., 1994: Land and Culture in Tropical Africa: Soils, Symbols, and the
Metaphysics of the Mundane. Annual Review of Anthropology 23:347-377.
55. Smith, L. C. & A. Subandoro, 2007: Measuring food security using household
expenditure surveys, food security in practice. International food policy.
56. Smith, L. C. H. Alderman, & Aduayom D., 2006: Food security in Sub-Saharan
Africa: New estimates from household expenditure surveys. IFPRI Research report
146. Washington, D.C. International Food Policy Research Institute.
57. Smith, L. C. Ruel, M. T. & Ndiaye, A., 2005, August: Why is child malnutrition lower
in urban than in rural areas? Evidence of 36 Developing countries World
Development, 33(8), 1285-1305
58. Smith, N., 1998: Nature at the Millennium: Production and re-enchantment. In
remaking reality: Nature at the Millennium. Bruce Braun, and Noel Castree, eds. Pp.
271-285. London: Routlege.

23
59. UNOCHA, 2012: Plan d’Action humanitaire pour la Republique Democratique du
Congo (2013. Dec. 2012 http:www.unocha.org/cap/appeals/plan-daction-humanitaire-
pour –la RDC-2013 (Accessed April, 2013).
60. USAID, 2010: USAID Country Profile: Property Rights and Resource governance, the
DRC.
61. Tarboton, Ian, 2012: A Growing City: Agriculture and Food Security in the growing
urban context. Thesis for Masters Degree in Architecture (Professional), at the
University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg.
62. Tollens, E., 2003: D’état actuel de la securite alimentaire en DR Congo: Diaggnostic et
perspectives. De l’aide humanitaire d’urgence au development durable de l’agriculture
pour une meilleure securite alimentaireen RD Congo (p.25). Kinshasa: Alliance Belgo
Congolaise, Combe.
63. Thornton, H., 2007: Chitedze. Retrieved 6/611
from:http://www.neverendingfood.org/activities/virtual-tour-of-chitedze-by-project-
hope/
64. Thornton, H., 2008: Permaculture adoption among Malawian farmers: A positive
deviance inquiry. MA thesis, school for International Training.
65. Tollens E., 2009: Agriculture, securite alimentaire et development economique:
Defis et enjeux, in T. Trefon (dir.). Reforme au Congo: attentes et desillusions, Paris,
L’Harmattan, 211-229
66. Trefon T., 2009: Reformes au Congo (DRC). Attentes et desillusions. L’Harmattan,
Musee Royal de l’ Afrique Central, Collection cahiers Africain, 275.
67. Veteto, J. and Lockyer, J., 2008: Environmental anthropology engaging Permaculture:
Moving theory and practice toward sustainability. Culture and Agriculture, 30(1&2),
pp, 47-58.
68. WFP Malawi., 2010a: Comprehensive Food Security and Vulnerability Analysis
(CFSVA). Retrieved 2/2/11 from: www.wfp.org/food-security.
69. WFP., 2013: Country summaries- Annex to the global food security update- Issue 9
February, 2013.
70. WPP Research, 2013: Woody perennial polyculture research/WPP Research. In:
Woody Perenn. Polycut. Res. Site. http://wppresearch.org/. Accessed May 2013
71. The World Bank., 2009: Implementing Agriculture for Development. Retrieved4/4/11
from: http:/siteresources.worldbank.org/ INTWDR2008/Resources/WDR_00_book.pdf

24
72. Yakah, J.A., 2012: PhD Proposal- Development of multi-stakeholder models, tools and
strategies for the restoration and sustainability of three agro-ecological zones of
Ghana: An alternative approach for agricultural extension in climate change
adaptation. University of Ghana, Legon, May 2012.
73. Yaro, A. J., 2006: Is deagrarianisation Real? A study of livelihood activities in Rural
Northern Ghana, the Journal of Mothern African studies, Vol.44, N0 1 Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
74. Yates, S. 2004: Doing social science research. London, U.K.: Sage Publications Ltd.
75. Yin, R., 2009: Case Study Research: Design and Methods (4th
.ed). Thousand Oaks,
CA: Sage Publications.
76. Yeomans PA., 1971: The city forest: the Keyline plan for the human environment
revolution. Keyline Publishing Pty., Sydney.
77. Ziervogel, G. and Ericksen, P.J., 2010: Adapting to climate change to sustain food
security. Advanced review, wires.wiley.com/climate-change.
78. Ziervogel, G. and Frayne, B., 2011: Climate change and Food security in Southern
African Cities. Urban Food Security Series N0. 8. Queen’s University and AFSUN:
Kingston and Cape Town.
Figure 1: Map of Kinshasa, 2005 (Source: from the Institute Gerographique, de Kinshasa.

Food Security in a changing Climate

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

What's hot

What's hot (20)

Similar to Food Security in a changing Climate

Similar to Food Security in a changing Climate (20)

Food Security in a changing Climate