KLUHLUK

1. Question 1: Rate the front cover on a scale of 1-10, 1 being poor and 10 being perfect.
Responses: 8, 9, 8, 6, 7, 4, 7, 6, 7
These responses showed that all the people that took part in my questionnaire thought
highly of the quality of my work with the exception of one participant who rated it a 4.
A graph to show the answers in question
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

2. Question 2: How would you improve the front cover?
Responses:
• More colour x2
• Make the heading stand out from the coverline x3
• Improve fonts x2
• The positioning of certain things x3
The results of this question showed that my design is not perfect but also that I does
not have any major issues with the overall design.

3. Question 3: Rate the contents page on a scale of 1-10, 1 being poor and 10 being perfect.
Responses: 5, 7, 4, 7, 9, 8, 6, 7, 5, 8
The results of this question showed that people also regarded my contents page as high
quality work.
Results for question 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

4. Question 4: How would you improve the contents page?
Responses:
• More colour x4
• More images x3
• Change fonts x3
The results of this question have determined that the audience thought that my Contents
page could have improvements and needs to be shaped in certain ways to make it more
professional.

5. Question 5: Rate the double page spread on a scale of 1 to 10?
Responses: 6, 5, 9, 10, 9, 8, 8, 7, 8, 9
From these results I can see that most of my target audience thought highly of my
questionnaire and seemed to like the presentation of it.
Results of question 5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

6. Question 6: How would you improve the double page spread?
• Layout x2
• No changes x3
• Another image x2
• 3 columns instead of 2 x 3
Again, from these results you can see that my double page spread was thought highly of
again by the target audience and therefore only a few things need to be tweaked and
incorporated.

7. Question 7: Do you think the magazine is worth the price you have to pay for it?
Responses:
• Yes x 8
• No x 2
From this, you can see that my target audience thinks the quality of my magazine lives up to
the price tag of £2.99, meaning that the magazine must look professional if people are
willing to buy it.

8. Question 8: Do you think the fonts used are good? Does the style suit the magazine genre?
(rock/indie/alternative)
Responses:
• Yes x6
• No x4
From this you can see that my fonts are subject to criticism, it is close to half liking them
and half not. This means that an implication I could do to improve the magazine would be
to experiment with different fonts.

9. Question 9: do you like the photos that I have used in the Magazine?
Responses:
• Yes x 7
• No x 3
The responses here show how my magazine has good photos that have improved the
magazine and made it more professional.

10. Question 10: Would you buy this magazine?
Responses:
• Yes x 9
• No x 1
The responses here show how my magazine is professional and how it is highly thought of by
the target audience.