The document discusses how bread can be used and eaten in various unconventional ways, such as wearing it as a hat or storing it in hills. It also compares how bread and pizza fall differently due to their varying surface areas and air resistance. However, the explanations and examples provided are inconsistent and factually incorrect at times.
3. Bread is to eat
● If you take time trip and put the big bread in the
hill, you'll be able to eat it for long time.
● You can barricade yourself in the “castle”
when you've been attacking by a tiger, cat, etc.
(Because you'll eat the castle as food.)
7. Bread is not to eat
● Moreover, if you take an experiment of the
theory of free fall at Torre di Pisa(not pizza).
Of course you know Galileo Galilei.
● You might consider that a pizza and a bread fall
at one time,
but actually, pizza(not pisa) is slower than
bread.
● The reason is that pissa(not pisa)'s surface
area is bigger than bread's, then the resistance
of the air of pizza is bigger than of the bread
when you experiment in pisa(not pizza).
9. Conclusion
● The bread might change the frame of free fall
theory.
(! Actually not.)
10. Further reading
● Darwin was born in Edinburgh and Cambridge.
(! Actually he was born in England. )
● But the bread was born in Hawaii.
● The bread want to become an animal.
● Then the bread can't eat.
12. Further reading
● The bread becomes an animal(plankton).
● It is very small.
● It comes from Itabasi-ku(itabasi-ku for transfer).
(Why ? He was born in Hawai ?)
18. End.
● Further reading might change the frame of
bread.
● But I notice that the story is not correct,
because it doesn't change the frame of “around
the bread”.
● So change to former.