Workaholism, work engagement and performance of the self-employed

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    1 Favorite

    Workaholism, work engagement and performance of the self-employed - Presentation Transcript

    1. Comparing the self-employed and employees on payroll Marjan Gorgievski a, Arnold Bakker a, Wilmar Schaufelib A Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands B Utrecht University, The Netherlands 1
    2. What predicts good work performance? Personality (e.g., Rauch & Frese, 2007; Zhao & Seibert, 2006)? Competencies (e.g. Markman, 2007)? Selfish passion for work (e.g., Shane, Locke & Collins, 2003)? 2
    3. Work engagement (Schaufeli & Bakker, 2003) Vigor Dedication Absorption Workaholism (Schaufeli, Taris & Bakker, 2006) Excessive working Compulsive working 3
    4. Warning from cultural psychology: Are our measures equivalent across cultures? 4
    5. scalar metric Equal variance I get carried away when I’m working I am immersed in Work engagement my work (absorption) I feel happy when I am working intensely 5
    6. Work engagement Full metric invariance Partial scalar invariance (3 items different of 9) Working compulsively Full metric invariance Partial scalar invariance (4 items different of 8) Working excessively Full metric invariance Partial scalar invariance (3 items different of 9) 6
    7. Raw sd Raw mean sd Raw Estimated mean Employee difference corrected SE s difference Work 4.08 1.12 3.71 1.16 .37 .43 (SE = .09) engagement Working 2.36 .55 2.24 .52 .12 .07 (SE = .03) excessively Working 2.07 .61 2.04 .57 .03 Ns compulsively Corrected difference is only slightly different from raw difference. 7
    8. Intra role performance Full metric invariance Equal variances Extra role perforance Full metric invariance Equal variances Innovativeness Partial metric invariance (1 item different from 6) Equal variances 8
    9. Working  In‐Role  excessively Performance .44 .78 .32 .63 .33 Working  -.47 Extra ‐Role .25 Compulsively Performance .18 .05 .53 -.40 Work  Innovativeness Engagement .24 9
    10. Working  In‐Role  excessively Performance .44 .78 .32 .63 .33 Working  -.47 Extra ‐Role .25 Compulsively Performance .18 .05 .53 -.40 Work  Innovativeness Engagement .24 10
    11. Working  In‐Role  excessively Performance .44 .78 .32 .63 .33 Working  -.47 Extra ‐Role .25 Compulsively Performance .18 .05 .53 -.40 Work  Innovativeness Engagement .24 11
    12. Working  In‐Role  excessively Performance .39 .72 .38 .33 Working  .21 Extra  Role .26 Compulsively ‐ Performance .42 .23 .04 .39 -.13 Work  Innovativeness Engagement .33 12
    13. Measurement equivalence may be an issue when comparing sub-cultures The self employed have more work engagement and work more excessively, but not more compulsively than salaried employees Working compulsively suppressed the positive effect of working excessively This pattern more visible among the self- emloyed, This effect stronger for innovation and extra role behavior 13
    SlideShare Zeitgeist 2009

    + Marjan GorgievskiMarjan Gorgievski Nominate

    custom

    312 views, 1 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    Workaholism, Work Engagement, and Performance: Comp more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 312
      • 312 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 1
    • Downloads 0
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories