Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
0
MRV System in Indonesia: 
Credibility, governance and benefit sharing
MRV System in Indonesia: 
Credibility, governance and benefit sharing
MRV System in Indonesia: 
Credibility, governance and benefit sharing
MRV System in Indonesia: 
Credibility, governance and benefit sharing
MRV System in Indonesia: 
Credibility, governance and benefit sharing
MRV System in Indonesia: 
Credibility, governance and benefit sharing
MRV System in Indonesia: 
Credibility, governance and benefit sharing
MRV System in Indonesia: 
Credibility, governance and benefit sharing
MRV System in Indonesia: 
Credibility, governance and benefit sharing
MRV System in Indonesia: 
Credibility, governance and benefit sharing
MRV System in Indonesia: 
Credibility, governance and benefit sharing
MRV System in Indonesia: 
Credibility, governance and benefit sharing
MRV System in Indonesia: 
Credibility, governance and benefit sharing
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

MRV System in Indonesia: 
Credibility, governance and benefit sharing

692

Published on

This presentation by Daniel Murdiyarso shows the history of forest governance in Indonesia, how the REDD+ strategy can be understood as a landscape approach, where potential REDD+ projects could be …

This presentation by Daniel Murdiyarso shows the history of forest governance in Indonesia, how the REDD+ strategy can be understood as a landscape approach, where potential REDD+ projects could be located in Indonesia, how the MRV system can still maintain credibility, what FREDDI is and what kind of nested approach we need for MRV payment.

Published in: Technology
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
692
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
4
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
18
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. MRV System in Indonesia: Credibility, governance and benefit sharing Daniel Murdiyarso
  • 2. Outline • Long history of forest governance system • REDD+: a steep learning curve • MRV system: maintaining credibility • Financing instrument • (Costs and) benefits sharing • Concluding remarks
  • 3. Long history of forest governance  Centralized, legally guided by national Law over resources, permitting and licensing procedures  Goods oriented rather than services – climate change was never in the agenda  Decentralized authorities with limited capacities  Leaving huge gaps in a lot of fronts
  • 4. A steep learning curve National REDD+ Strategy Pilot Province REDD+ Agency MRV and Financial Instrument Demonstration Activities REL/RL (technical) Safeguards Underlying causes of DD Consultation processes Institutional capacity building NICFI KFCP/UN-REDD IFCA/WB-FCPF | | | | 2007 2008 2009 2013 and beyond
  • 5. REDD+ strategy: a landscape approach
  • 6. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Potential REDD+ projects               Ketapang/FFI/Kalbar Kapuas Hulu /FORCLIME/Kalbar Kapuas Hulu/FFI/Kalbar Sentarum/FFI/Kalbar Lamandau/YAYORIN-RARE/Kalteng Rimba Raya/RRC-Infinite Earth/Kalteng Katingan/RMU-Starling Resources/Kalteng Sebangau/WWF/Kalteng KFCP/AusAID-MoFo/Kalteng Heart of Borneo/WWF/Kalteng Kutai Barat/WWF/Kaltim Kutai-Malinau/Global Green/Kaltim RHOI/BOS/Kaltim Malinau/GER/Kaltim Malinau/FORCLIME/Kaltim Berau Forest Carbon/TNC/Kaltim Berau/FORCLIME/Kaltim         • Mamuju/Inhutani/SulBar • TN Lore Lindu/UNREDD-MoFo/Sulteng • SM Nantu/YANI/Gorontalo • Poigar/ONF/Sulut         • Merang/GiZ/Sumsel • Berbak/ZSL/Jambi • SFCP/AusAID-MoFo/Jambi • Kampar Ring/APRIL/Riau • Tesso Nilo/WWF/Riau • Siberut/Global Green/Sumbar • Leuser/YLI/Aceh • Ulu Masen/Aceh Green/Aceh   • Lombok/KOICA-MoFo/NTB • TN Meru Betiri/ITTO-MoFo/Jatim Biak-Rumfor/Emerald Planet Mamberamo/New Forest Merauke-Mappi-Asmat/WWF Jayapura/WWF • TEBE Project/YTM-AusAID/NTB
  • 7. MRV system: maintaining credibility M IPCC – Good Practice Guidance for LULUCF activities • Publish data (area, biomass data, carbon density) • Describe methodologies (measurements in 5 pools, use model • Include all greenhouse gases (CO2, N2O, CH4) • Document QA/QC procedures R IPCC Reporting Principle – managed uncertainties • Consistency • Transparency • Comparability • Completeness • Accuracy V Validation Project development phase • Estimation of future GHG emissions reductions to be achieved • Use models (historical trend, numeric, economic) Verification Project monitoring phase • Confirmation of actual GHG emission reductions achieved during crediting period • Compare between estimations and observations
  • 8. Developing higher Tier EFs is possible
  • 9. FREDDI: financing instrument • Modalities: grant making, trust fund • Funding: Broad array of opportunities/initiatives • Guiding principles: performance-based and safeguards • Governance: GoI-led design and management, Board of Trustee
  • 10. (Costs and) benefits sharing M • National REDD entity • Sub-national entities • Project proponents/implementers • High costs R • National REDD entity • Sub-national entities • Project proponents/implementers • Potentially high costs V Validation • In-house validation processes • During development phase • Potentially low costs Verification • Third party - independent verifiers • During monitoring phase • High costs
  • 11. Nesting sub national projects Market or fund CO2-eq Verified reports Stream of fund National Reporting • Carbon • Social • Biodiversity MRV Aggregate Province Benefit sharing • Technical • Administrative • Financial MRV Aggregate Project Project Project MRV MRV MRV
  • 12. What kind of nested approach?
  • 13. Key messages  Indonesia has good practice MRV for emission hotspots in place  Linking GHG emissions and removals with IPCC Guidelines will ensure credibility  Nested-approach for MRV-payment may be viable; need further thoughts

×