• Like
  • Save
Session 6. Harris - How Can We Understand Nutrition Impacts
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Session 6. Harris - How Can We Understand Nutrition Impacts

on

  • 142 views

http://www.a4nh.cgiar.org/

http://www.a4nh.cgiar.org/

Statistics

Views

Total Views
142
Views on SlideShare
142
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
1
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Session 6. Harris - How Can We Understand Nutrition Impacts Session 6. Harris - How Can We Understand Nutrition Impacts Document Transcript

    • How Can We Understand Nutrition Impacts?Jody HarrisA4NH value chains for nutrition meeting, IFPRI, June 2013Nutritional status is determined by food, health and care. The agriculture sector could conceivably be asked to beaccountable for stages along the causal pathway as far as food production and consumption (diets), but this sector alonecannot be wholly accountable for nutrition; generally a package of interventions covering all three domains (accordingto context) would be necessary to have an impact on nutrition. The agriculture sector should however ensure (monitor)to ‘do no harm’ in terms of health- for instance an environment free of contaminants- and care- for instance women’stime for childcare; the sector should also be aware of the continuum of nutrition from under- to over-nutrition, and itsrole in the production of excess calories in a changing and urbanizing world.The value chain projects presented at the meeting were very varied, so it is difficult to give prescriptions on nutritionindicators; most important will be to think through the aims, context, and duration of the project, as well as samplingissues such as available sample size, before deciding on what to measure. Below is a general synopsis of nutritionindicators, and initial thoughts on what each of the nutrition-sensitive value chain projects might like to consider (note:This is not a final recommendation for what the projects should measure; rather just thoughts provoked by themeeting).Dietary diversity is a useful measure of diet quality in individuals (see Mary Arimond’s presentation), and can be used aspart of formative work to understand local diets; as part of an impact evaluation to assess changes in diets attributed tothe intervention; and as an adjunct to studies looking at the impact of single foods in order to assess that food’s place inthe overall diet, or to check for displacement of other food groups (‘do no harm’). Several projects presented will alsowant to look in detail at consumption of the target food that the value chain is promoting. Most projects will also wantto look at ‘knowledge’, broadly defined; what exactly is assessed here will depend on the individual project, but couldinclude awareness of the nutritional properties of the food group or of nutrition in general, attitudes to different foods,thoughts on certification or safety, etc. Anthropometry will generally not be useful in value chain studies promoting asingle food or food group and not addressing the health and care determinants of nutrition; value chain projects whichare part of a broader package of interventions addressing these, or which have the potential sample sizes, duration andimpact pathways to address nutritional status could consider anthropometry. Some projects would be better assessingbiomarkers for specific nutrients included in food products, or markers of infection, depending on the aims of the study.The table below gives an overview of indicators the different projects might like to consider.In summary, most projects presented target a single food or food group, rather than a person’s diet, but assessment ofdietary diversity is useful to assess the project’s contribution to the diversity (and therefore quality) of the diet; this is arelatively fast, easy and cheap method that has been validated in children under 2 (7 food groups) and older childrenand women (16 food groups). Projects targeting a single food should also measure consumption of this food. Mostprojects would also want to measure the ‘knowledge’ relevant to its particular aims. Anthropometry did not seem usefulor feasible in the projects as presented, at least at this seed-funded stage. Note that all indicators of diet and nutritionare collected at individual level; value chains have to reach the consumer to address nutrition issues.DNH: Do No Harm