Syphilis Forum Recap Report - Presentation Transcript
AFAO NGMSAP Forum Recap Report
Screening and Testing in Clinical Settings
Current clinical guidelines for HIV management and HIV & STI testing among gay men should be revised to ensure consistency with the NGMSAP.
‘ Red book’ authors should be approached to include sexual health checks
Should include other tests for HIV-neg men e.g. rapid HIV and HIV antigen tests
All public sexual health clinics and relevant private providers should review current syphilis testing services in order to reduce barriers to more frequent testing.
Complexity, co-morbidities and ageing. Priorities of HIV-pos men and HSA men cf. hep C
Pester power and promotion of guidelines
Need more data of patient experience and barriers e.g. waiting times and cost of appointment
What about HIV-pos men not on ARV therapy – how to increase/maintain testing if not presenting for regular monitoring?
Different approaches for GPs, hospital-based and sexual health clinics
MSHC and E Syd Doctors opt out pathology form for HIV-pos men (it’s the frequency [that counts] stupid). Detects a much higher proportion of asymptomatic infections.
Pop-up reminder for clinicians
Screening and Testing in Clinical Settings
Clinics review/develop procedures aimed at identifying highly sexually active HIV negative men (20+ 6/12) to ensure that they are tested in accordance with the recommendation.
CASI self-assessment for HIV-neg men (incl. sms or email reminder)
Standard sexual history taking software be developed
MSM have regular contact with GPs but opportunistic testing requires skills, but ‘computer says yes’ options could be optimised
Materials in waiting rooms
Capacity building of low-caseload GPs
Screening and Testing in Clinical Settings
Jurisdictions should review clinic hours and consider new service models.
Research suggests that difficulty getting appt and unpredictable waiting times are major barriers
out-of-hours and nurse-practitioner screening
But out-of-hours services poorly attended (e.g. Saturday mornings at Holdsworth House, Sanctuary, and in BNE, but are successful in PER. Evening clinics vs. weekends?). But are these services promoted i.e. do potential new patients know about them? In PER took some time to build clientele
Express clinic (Sydney SHSC) incl. self-collection and no-questions-asked
Increasing Access to Screening and Testing
Jurisdictions should review clinic hours and consider new service models.
Partnerships with sexual health & pathology services with educators conducting pre- and post-test discussion (WA)
Pre-signed pathology forms
FLASH Clinic and Fast tracking (incl. pre-signed forms and swabs)
Sauna-based testing – high test yield (WA)
Venue-based testing can attract men not attending clinics, but would then be more likely to attend clinics in future (Qld)
Increasing Access to Screening and Testing
A working group should be established to trial or investigate use of rapid syphilis tests & develop guidelines for use of rapid tests. Hard to reach men should be a particular focus for increased testing initiatives.
Acceptability study of rapid syph and HIV testing in MEL. (But rapid spyh test does not distinguish between current or previous infection – need algorithm for confirmatory testing)
70% said would increase testing frequency if offered in clinic
40% said would increase testing frequency if able to test at home
Preferred rapid test because of immediacy, ease & simplicity, less pain , less invasive BUT some concerns
How to integrate? Training & quality control? Medicare? What settings?
Rapid test for syph is approved for use in Australia
Need to get laboratories on board
Home testing? (application with FDA for Orasure HIV home testing) Is there a population who are not currently testing at all who would test at home? (Similar concerns were raised about home pregnancy testing)
Rapid testing is all the rage
Partner Notification
Internet-based patient-led and/or clinician-led contact tracing systems should be incorporated into clinical practice.
Incl. printable path forms (PER) & prescriptions (US and CAN)
In DDU, two-thirds prefer sms reminders (for testing) [is this trend same for Let Him Know?]
Limited evidence of hoax use
Contact tracing profiles by public health agencies on gay sex sites (Wash DC model)
Need better data on effectiveness – how many partners contacted and present for testing & treatment? Need more research on this. Not much published on effectiveness. Clinicians could get feedback on what happens i.e. need to see how data used. Also could be good education tool for low-caseload GPs.
In Vic Enhanced Surveillance only 2 to3% tests were result of partner notification (based on clinicians perspective)
Needs to be accompanied by protocol of what to do (New ASHM contract tracing guidelines out soon)
High level of acceptability of contact tracing is evident in research – but historical concerns are still present among PLHIV
Syphilis Awareness and Promoting Testing
A nationally consistent approach to the marketing of information and key messages about syphilis to gay men should be developed.
Motivated by own sexual health concerns (in ACON market testing) but additionally community motivation was identified in NCHECR market testing)
Syph not high on agenda in terms of motivation for testing (cf. HIV)
Perceived as dirty, shameful, ancient; associated with illicit behaviour ; unpleasant symptoms
Baseline knowledge on transmission and symptoms is low
Link testing to stopping spread of syph
Avoid dirty and/or rusty imagery!
Target, motivate, mobilise!
Research
8) Australian funding sources for the syphilis chemoprophylaxis trial should be investigated if needed.
Funding secured from US for study to start early 2010 but will need additional local funding esp for marketing etc.
Governance
Jurisdictional committees (JC) should be should be established to oversee process at State and Territory levels.
Yes, good idea
A national committee should be established to monitor progress & convene annual NGMSAP review process.
Yes, good idea
Monitoring & Evaluation
Committees responsible for syphilis surveillance, Periodic Surveys, and other relevant studies should review what enhancements can be undertaken to collect the NGMSAP indicators.
National coordination i.e. consistent data collection (outputs, outcomes & impact)
All jurisdictions should be able to collect data on MSM, symptoms and HIV status
Contact tracing data collection is inconsistent
Collect data on ‘contacts’ presenting for testing
Consider sentinel surveillance of MSM in all jurisdictions (as in Victorian model)
Need prevalence as well as notifications data
Jurisdictional questionnaire – activities undertaken as part of the plan
Sexual health service network (estd. for chlamydia) could be enhanced to include syphilis – can be used to determine syphilis prevalence among clinic attendees
Consistent item on GCPS related to blood test for syphilis (from 2009 in Syd & Qld)
Other enhancements to GCPS (but need consistency across country)
Other studies e.g. HIV Futures, Private Lives and MYRIAD, and dedicated studies
Need knowledge data
Need urgent research on barriers to testing and on rapid testing (NCHSR & STIPU)
Medicare data or laboratory network data
Workforce development
Monitoring & Evaluation
14) A working group should be convened to operationalise the NGMSAP Monitoring and Evaluation Plan.
0 comments
Post a comment