Highbank Resources Ltd. (HBK.V) - February 2015 Presentation.

1. Loadout Location >
Donahue Creek
FEBRUARY 2015
1
This document contains certain forward-looking statements and information relating to Highbank that are based on the beliefs of
management as well as assumptions made by and information currently available to management. When used in this document, the
words "anticipate," "believe," "estimate," "expect," and "intend" and similar expressions, as they relate to Highbank or its management,
are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such statements reflect the current view of Highbank respecting future events such
as the antcipated completion of certain Prince Rupert-Kitimat construction projects, the Company’s ramp-up schedule, various stages of
financing by the company, completion of stage two and any production estimates, the Company’s use of proceeds calculation, projected
cashflow forecasted revenue and production dates, revenue and profit, and are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions,
including the risks and uncertainties noted. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying
assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those described herein as anticipated, believed, estimated,
expected or intended. Any technical or geotechnical information related to the Swamp Point North resource was prepared under the
direction of Keith McCandlish of DMT Geosciences Ltd., (formerly Associated Geosciences of Calgary, Alberta), a qualified person under
NI 43-101.

2.  East side of Portland Canal fjord
on protected, year round ice free
tidewater
 Site access by helicopter, float
equipped aircraft, or boat
 78 miles by water, south to
Prince Rupert and 38 miles
north to Stewart
 Importantly only 35 miles south
by water, to Grassy Point, site of
proposed LNG Terminal/Plants
2

3. Swamp
Point
3

4. 4

5. 5

6. Sector: Resources
Property Type: Construction Aggregate
Stock Market Symbol: TSX.V: HBK; Frankfurt: V7O
52-Wk Trading Range: C$ 0.105 - C$ 0.38
Shares I&O: 103,165,999(Feb 28, 2015)
Market Capitalization: C$18.0 million (approx.)
6

7. Athabasca Minerals TSX.V: ABM
Price: $1.08
52-Wk Range: $0.65 -$3.20
Market Cap: $39.9 million
Polaris Minerals (TSX: PLS)
Price: $2.60
52-Wk Range $1.65 - $3.20
Market Cap: $227.9 million
7

8.  Sand, gravel, crushed stone essential
for road building and concrete for
commercial operations
 Aggregate is the world’s most mined
material next to oil. 2012 global sales
revenues were est. at $99 billion, an
increase of 41% from 2010 est. sales of
$70 billion
 Annual Canadian consumption of
aggregate 10 to 15 tons per person
 BC Production was 38 million tonnes in
2010 valued at C$322million
 BC Production expected to considerably
exceed previous years
8

9.  The mining of a sand and gravel deposit for construction in the Prince Rupert
area to create a significant new supply source for the industry*
 All permits, licences and approvals obtained
 Approx. $5.4 million of development and $3.2 million equipment capital costs
 Proximity to LNG and pipeline projects – high demand for aggregate
 First sales commitment received, other bids placed for supply
 Cooperative agreement in place with First Nations
 Processing Equipment on site and site preparation underway
 Near-term production, barge loading commissioned Nov 2014
 Land position increased from 51 to 174 Hectares (all in good standing)
9
*The Company decision to proceed with production is not based on a feasibility study of
reserves demonstrating economic and technical viability and as a result there may exist
increased uncertainty, economic and technical risk of failure associated with such
production decision.

10. 10
Classification Tonnes
Measured 62,936,877
Indicated 8,775,166
Measured and Indicated 71,712,043
Inferred 2,246,464
Source: DMT Geosciences Ltd. (Formerly, Associated
Geosciences Ltd.) prepared the resource model and
estimation under the direction of Keith McCandlish,
P.Geo., and P. Cain, PhD, P.Eng., both qualified
persons defined under NI 43-101

11.  PRINCE RUPERT AREA – HAS LIMITED SUPPLIES OF
QUALITY SAND AND GRAVEL
 HIGHBANK’S SWAMP POINT DEPOSIT MEETS
SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION AGGREGATE
 NEAREST, LARGEST AND MOST ACCESSIBLE SOURCE
WITH LOW COST
TRANSPORTATION - BARGING
11

12.  Primary Target Region
Prince Rupert-Kitimat, B.C. and Alaska
 Competitive Advantage
Proximity to the Port of Prince Rupert’s construction
projects facilitates port to port transportation –
most economic mode of delivery
 Strategic location to supply Grassy Pt. and
proposed pipelines
 Highbank’s First Sales Contract
To North Coast Concrete. 150,000 tonnes.
Signed March 2014.
12
Proposed Off –Loading site at Ridley Island

13.  10 year expansion plan of Prince Rupert
Port Authority - $1.3 billion Federal
Initiative
 Spectra – BG, 850-km pipeline project -
$6-$8 billion
 Canpotex potash terminal - $400 million
 Watson Island Industrial Site
Redevelopment - $90 million
 Ridley Terminals coal expansion - $200
million and $90 million road and
infrastructure projects
 Global TV video clip on multi-billion
dollar projects in Prince Rupert-Kitimat
http://tinyurl.com/9q4syyx
13
Canpotex Potash Export Terminal

14.  Exxon Mobile Imperial Oil export, permit
filed for terminal at Grassy Point (38 miles
from Swamp Point)
 Region’s share of BC provincial govt’s $25
billion Pacific Gateway Transportation
Strategy investment
 Pacific North West LNG Terminal $9 - $11
Billion
 See Invest in Northwest http://investnorthwestbc.ca
14

15.  Site preparation complete October and Plant installed –
stockpiles of aggregate being prepared for processing
 Pilings for loadout completed October 2014
 Loadout conveyor installed October/November 2014
 Loading first barge for shipment estimated March 2015
 Initial mining phase at rates of up to 235,000 tonnes
per year
15

16.  Initiate Environmental Impact and associated studies
for unlimited production March – July 2015
 Assess requirements for plant expansion February
2015
 Install new conveyor from plant to load-out conveyor
– 2nd
Quarter 2015
 Commence plant scale-up and determine additional
equipment requirements
 Year 2015/16 Full Scale production
16

17. Source of Funds
Convertible Debenture Financing C$4.0 million
Other Financing (Short Term Loans,
warrant exercising) C$3.0 – C$3.5 million
Use of Funds
Swamp Point North Capital & Start-up Costs C$6.5 – C$7.0 million
General Working Capital C$ 500,000
Total C$7,500,000
17

18.  Victor N. Bryant, I.Eng; MAusIMM, President/CEO/Director
40+ years mining experience incl. with Major Mining Companies
 Gary Musil, Secretary/CFO/Director
30 years financial and management consulting experience
 Stan Spletzer, VP of Aggregate Operations
30 years contracting experience incl. for Canfor, Houston Forest Products,
and BC Ministry of Forests
 Luard J Manning, P.Eng (Mining) Director
50 years mining experience as a consultant and as President of L.J.
Manning and Associates since 1967
 Jim Place, P. Geo;
25+ years with BC Government, engineering and consulting companies
including Levelton, and quarry evaluations
 Bill Loucks CPA, CA, CFP
25+ years providing audit, accounting, tax & consulting services.
Managing Partner – Collins Barrow Chatham - Kent
18

19. #600 - 625 Howe Street,
Vancouver, B.C. V6C 2T6
Victor Bryant CEO/President/Director
Gary Musil, CFO, Secretary/Director
t. (604) 683-6648/f. (604) 683-1350
highbank@telus.net
www.highbankresources.com
This document may contain forward-looking statements based on assumptions and judgments of management regarding future events or
results. Forward-looking statements are projections of events, revenues, income, future economic performance or management’s plan and
objective for future operations and include, without limitation, statements with respect to the anticipated production from the Swamp Point
North Aggregate Project, the realization of mineral estimates, success of mining operations, the timing and amount of estimated future
production, title disputes or claims, environmental risks, limitations on insurance coverage, current and anticipated purchase negotiations
and arrangements, requirements for additional capital; and government regulation of mining operations. In some cases, you can identify
forward- looking statements by the use of terminology such as “may”, “should”, “expects”, “plans”, “anticipates”, “believes”, “estimates”,
“predicts”, “potential” or “continue” or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. By their very nature forward-looking
statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or
achievements of the Company to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the
forward-looking statements. Such factors, including: fluctuations in worldwide prices and demand for aggregates; changes in project
parameters as plans continue to be refined; possible variations in grade and or recovery rates; accidents, labour disputes as well as those
factors detailed from time to time in the Company's interim and annual financial statements and management's discussion and analysis of
those statements, are filed and available for review on SEDAR at www.sedar.com.
19