The document outlines four options for building material reuse and optimization. Option 1 describes using environmental product declarations for building products. Option 2 involves using products that minimize environmental impacts or are locally sourced. Option 3 requires reporting on raw material sources and commitments to environmental responsibility. Option 4 addresses optimizing building products by eliminating hazardous materials.
Application of Bio-FAEG, a Biofouling Assessment Model in Engine Performance...Tosin Onabanjo
The recent advances for flexible fuel operation and the integration of biofuels and blends in gas turbines raise concern on engine health and quality. One of such potential threats involves the contamination and the growth of microorganisms in fuels and fuel systems with consequential effect on engine performance and health. In the past, the effects of microbial growth in fuels have been qualitatively described; however their effects in gas turbines have not necessarily been quantified. In this presentation, the effects of fuel deterioration are examined on a simulated aero-derivative gas turbine. A diesel-type fuel comprising of thirteen (13) hydrocarbon fractions was formulated and degraded with Bio-fAEG, a bio fouling assessment model that defines degraded fuels for performance simulation and analysis, predicts biodegradation rates as well as calculates the amount of water required to initiate degradation under aerobic conditions. The degraded fuels were integrated in the fuel library of Turbomatch (v2.0) and a twin shaft gas turbine was modeled for fuel performance analysis. The results indicate a significant loss in performance with reduced thermal efficiency of 1% and 10.4% and increased heat rate of 1% and 11.6% for the use of 1% and 10% degraded fuels respectively. Also parameters such as exhaust gas temperature and mass flow deviated from the baseline data indicating potential impact on engine health. Therefore, for reliable and safe operation, it is important to ensure engines run on good quality of fuel. This computational study provides insights on fuel deterioration in gas turbines and how it affects engine health.
Application of Bio-FAEG, a Biofouling Assessment Model in Engine Performance...Tosin Onabanjo
The recent advances for flexible fuel operation and the integration of biofuels and blends in gas turbines raise concern on engine health and quality. One of such potential threats involves the contamination and the growth of microorganisms in fuels and fuel systems with consequential effect on engine performance and health. In the past, the effects of microbial growth in fuels have been qualitatively described; however their effects in gas turbines have not necessarily been quantified. In this presentation, the effects of fuel deterioration are examined on a simulated aero-derivative gas turbine. A diesel-type fuel comprising of thirteen (13) hydrocarbon fractions was formulated and degraded with Bio-fAEG, a bio fouling assessment model that defines degraded fuels for performance simulation and analysis, predicts biodegradation rates as well as calculates the amount of water required to initiate degradation under aerobic conditions. The degraded fuels were integrated in the fuel library of Turbomatch (v2.0) and a twin shaft gas turbine was modeled for fuel performance analysis. The results indicate a significant loss in performance with reduced thermal efficiency of 1% and 10.4% and increased heat rate of 1% and 11.6% for the use of 1% and 10% degraded fuels respectively. Also parameters such as exhaust gas temperature and mass flow deviated from the baseline data indicating potential impact on engine health. Therefore, for reliable and safe operation, it is important to ensure engines run on good quality of fuel. This computational study provides insights on fuel deterioration in gas turbines and how it affects engine health.
A project report on indexing of similar group of industries based on various ...Mukul Kumar
Through the course of this project, an attempt has been made to formulate, test, and improve an environmental tool (CEPI) to assess the pollution potential of industrial clusters/ areas in India. Several existing methods and approaches were thoroughly studied and analyzed before commencing the work on this project.
It involved a detailed assessment of various environmental indicators and investigation of the status of environmental resources such as land,vegetation, air, and water. Spatial and temporal variations in various environmental indicators have also been analyzed and inferred for this purpose.
Presentation delivered at the CalAPA Spring Asphalt Pavement Conference April 9-10, 2014 in Ontario. Topic: Understanding the ins and outs of environmental sustainability as it relates to pavements, including lifecycle measurement.
At the Asia Clean Energy Forum 2016 Ricardo Energy & Environment’s waste management and resource efficiency experts discussed a range of critical issues, including financial, institutional, policy, regulatory, engineering, environmental and social issues around the planning for and delivery of appropriate and effective waste to energy infrastructure in developing economies.
In this presentation Phil White discusses the environmental impacts of waste treatment.
The Center for Thematic Environmental Networks (TEN) is a Center for education and research in the fields of environment and sustainable development.
TEN Center promotes the exchange of knowledge and information on the environmental field and offers tools and supplementary approaches in order to solve environmental issues with specific reference to sustainable development.
TEN Center:
promotes education and advanced training programs on sustainable development and environmental management;
develops research activities on the main areas of environmental protection, with specific focus on developing countries;
hosts initiatives which provide a meeting platform for the competent authorities, researchers and those who are involved in environmental and sustainable development issues.
Since 2003, TEN manages and coordinates advanced training programs devised for director generals and managers of public administrations, researchers and private sector experts from the People’s Republic of China and Eastern European countries. The aim is to augment and improve the capabilities of policy-makers and to facilitate knowledge transfer in order to promote sustainable environmental, social and economic policies.
Overview presentation on Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs) delivered by Dr. John Harvey of the University of California Pavement Research Center (UCPRC) at the CalAPA EPD workshop on Oct. 25, 2023 in Sacramento.
Building as a Teaching Tool: School of Communication and Media at Montclair S...Frank Cunha
This building obtained a USGBC certification level of Silver and was last certified on: October 18, 2018. This presentation can be used as a teaching tool for our students, staff, visitors and the public at large.
CarE-Service Techno-polymer recycling by Radici GroupOlgaRodrguezLargo
Presentation of the recycling process developed in CarE-Service Project during the First Exploitation Webinar of the project held on 9th December 2020 by Radici Group
More Related Content
Similar to Zak Patten - Presentation - LEED v4 14-03-03
A project report on indexing of similar group of industries based on various ...Mukul Kumar
Through the course of this project, an attempt has been made to formulate, test, and improve an environmental tool (CEPI) to assess the pollution potential of industrial clusters/ areas in India. Several existing methods and approaches were thoroughly studied and analyzed before commencing the work on this project.
It involved a detailed assessment of various environmental indicators and investigation of the status of environmental resources such as land,vegetation, air, and water. Spatial and temporal variations in various environmental indicators have also been analyzed and inferred for this purpose.
Presentation delivered at the CalAPA Spring Asphalt Pavement Conference April 9-10, 2014 in Ontario. Topic: Understanding the ins and outs of environmental sustainability as it relates to pavements, including lifecycle measurement.
At the Asia Clean Energy Forum 2016 Ricardo Energy & Environment’s waste management and resource efficiency experts discussed a range of critical issues, including financial, institutional, policy, regulatory, engineering, environmental and social issues around the planning for and delivery of appropriate and effective waste to energy infrastructure in developing economies.
In this presentation Phil White discusses the environmental impacts of waste treatment.
The Center for Thematic Environmental Networks (TEN) is a Center for education and research in the fields of environment and sustainable development.
TEN Center promotes the exchange of knowledge and information on the environmental field and offers tools and supplementary approaches in order to solve environmental issues with specific reference to sustainable development.
TEN Center:
promotes education and advanced training programs on sustainable development and environmental management;
develops research activities on the main areas of environmental protection, with specific focus on developing countries;
hosts initiatives which provide a meeting platform for the competent authorities, researchers and those who are involved in environmental and sustainable development issues.
Since 2003, TEN manages and coordinates advanced training programs devised for director generals and managers of public administrations, researchers and private sector experts from the People’s Republic of China and Eastern European countries. The aim is to augment and improve the capabilities of policy-makers and to facilitate knowledge transfer in order to promote sustainable environmental, social and economic policies.
Overview presentation on Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs) delivered by Dr. John Harvey of the University of California Pavement Research Center (UCPRC) at the CalAPA EPD workshop on Oct. 25, 2023 in Sacramento.
Building as a Teaching Tool: School of Communication and Media at Montclair S...Frank Cunha
This building obtained a USGBC certification level of Silver and was last certified on: October 18, 2018. This presentation can be used as a teaching tool for our students, staff, visitors and the public at large.
CarE-Service Techno-polymer recycling by Radici GroupOlgaRodrguezLargo
Presentation of the recycling process developed in CarE-Service Project during the First Exploitation Webinar of the project held on 9th December 2020 by Radici Group
Similar to Zak Patten - Presentation - LEED v4 14-03-03 (20)
CarE-Service Techno-polymer recycling by Radici Group
Zak Patten - Presentation - LEED v4 14-03-03
1.
2. Op#on
1:
Historic
Building
Reuse
(5
points)
No
demo
unless
structurally
unsound
All
altera:ons
according
to
local/nat’l.
standards
Consult
preserva:on
pro
if
no
historic
review
required
Op#on
2:
Abandoned/Blighted
Bldg.
Renova:on
(5
points)
Maintain
at
least
50%
of
exis:ng
structure
Renovate
to
state
of
produc:ve
occupancy
May
exclude
up
to
25%
of
surface
area
due
to
deteriora:on/damage
Op#on
3:
Building
And
Material
Reuse
(2
–
4
Points)
Reuse
or
salvage
building
materials
as
%
of
surface
area
Include
structural
elements,
enclosure
materials,
&
permanent
interior
elements
Exclude
from
calcula:on
window
assemblies
&
any
hazardous
materials
remediated
Op#on
4:
Whole-‐Building
Life-‐
Cycle
Analysis
(3
Points)
For
NC,
LCA
must
show
10%
less
in
3
of
6
impact
measures
vs.
ref.
bldg.
One
impact
measure
must
be
global
warming
poten:al
No
impact
measure
may
be
more
than
5%
increase
over
ref.
bldg.
NC-‐v4
Credit
MRc1
Building
Life-‐Cycle
Impact
Reduc:on
3. Op#on
1:
Environmental
Product
Declara:on
(1
point)
Use
20+
diff.
permanent
products
from
5+
manufacturers
w/
cradle-‐to-‐gate
scope
mee:ng
one
of
following
criteria:
Publicly
available,
cri:cally
reviewed
LCA
(1/4
credit)
Industry-‐wide
(generic)
EPD
w/
3rd-‐party
cer:fica:on
(Type
III),
incl.
external
verifica:on
(1/2
credit)
Product-‐specific
EPD
w/
3rd-‐party
cer:fica:on
(Type
III),
incl.
external
verifica:on
(1
whole
credit
)
Op#on
2:
Mul:-‐aaribute
Op:miza:on
(1
Point)
Use
products
that
meet
one
of
following
criteria
for
50%
of
the
total
cost
of
permanent
products:
Show
impact
below
industry
avg.
in
at
least
3
environmental
categories
(100%
of
cost)
Sourced
within
100
miles
of
project
site
(200%
of
cost)
Structure
+
enclosure
materials
must
be
≤
30%
of
value
of
compliant
building
products
NC-‐v4
Credit
MRc2
Building
Product
Disclosure
&
Op:miza:on
–
Enviro.
Product
Declara:ons
(EPDs)
4. Op#on
1:
Raw
Material
Source
&
Extrac:on
Repor:ng
(1
point)
Use
20+
diff.
permanent
products
from
5+
manufacturers
w/
public
reports
incl.
raw
material
extrac:on
loca:ons
&
specific
commitments
to
environmental
responsibility
Sourced
from
mfr.
w/
self-‐declared
reports
(1/2
credit)
3rd-‐party
verified
corp.
sustainability
reports
incl.
enviro.
impacts
of
extrac:on
&
supply
chain
(1
whole
credit
)
Op#on
2:
Leadership
Extrac:on
Prac:ces
(1
Point)
Use
products
that
meet
one
of
following
criteria
for
25%
of
the
total
cost
of
permanent
products:
1)
Extended
producer
responsibility
2)
Bio-‐based
raw
materials
3)
Cer:fied
wood
4)
Reused
materials
5)
Recycled
content
Sourced
within
100
miles
of
project
site
(200%
of
cost)
No
double
coun:ng
of
single
product
components
compliant
w/
mul:ple
responsible
extrac:on
criteria
NC-‐v4
Credit
MRc3
Building
product
disclosure
and
op:miza:on
-‐
sourcing
of
raw
materials
5. Op#on
1:
Material
Ingredient
Repor:ng
(1
point)
Use
20+
diff.
permanent
products
from
5+
mfrs.
using
any
of
below
to
show
chemical
inventory
product
to
≥
0.1%
(1000
ppm):
Manufacturer
has
published
complete
content
inventory
Health
Product
Declara:on
has
published
full
disclosure
of
known
hazards
Cer:fied
at
Cradle
to
Cradle
Op#on
2:
Material
Ingredient
Op:miza:on
(1
Point)
Use
products
that
document
material
ingredient
op:miza:on
for
≥
25%
of
total
cost
of
permanent
products
using
the
paths
below:
If
any
ingredients
are
assessed
w/
GreenScreen
List
Translator
(100%
of
cost)
If
all
ingredients
are
assessed
w/
GreenScreen
List
Translator
(150%
of
cost)
End-‐use
products
are
cer:fied
Cradle
to
Cradle
(100%
to
150%
of
cost)
If
no
ingredients
on
EU’s
REACH
Authoriza:on
or
Candidate
list
(100%
of
cost)
Op#on
3:
Product
Manufacturer
Supply
Chain
Op:miza:on
(1
Point)
Use
products
that
meet
one
of
following
criteria
for
≥
25%
of
the
total
cost
of
permanent
products:
Sourced
from
product
mfrs.
who
document
≥
99%
of
ingredients
and
3rd-‐party
verified
supply
chain
w/
processes
in
place
to
maximize
health,
safety,
and
stewardship
(100%
of
cost)
NC-‐v4
Credit
MRc4
Building
product
disclosure
and
op:miza:on
-‐
material
ingredients
#2
&
#3:
Sourced
within
100
miles
of
project
site
(200%
of
cost)
Value
of
indiv.
products
w/
op:ons
#2
or
#3
can
be
combined
to
reach
25%
(ea.
product
only
counts
once)
6. NC-‐v4
SSc1:
Site
assessment
Before
design,
evaluate
sustainable
op:ons
by
documen:ng
the
below:
(1
point)
Topography
Contour
mapping,
unique
topographic
features,
slope
stability
risks
Hydrology
Flood
hazards,
wetlands,
lakes,
streams,
shorelines,
rainwater
collec:on/reuse
opportuni:es,
water
storage
capacity
Climate
Solar
exposure,
heat
island
effect
poten:al,
seasonal
sun
angles,
prevailing
winds,
monthly
precipita:on
&
temp.
ranges
Vegeta3on
Vegeta:on
types,
greenfield
area,
tree
mapping,
threatened
or
endangered
species,
unique
habitat,
invasive
plant
species
Soils
NRCS
soils
delinea:on,
USDA
prime
farmland,
healthy
soils,
previous
development,
disturbed
soils
Human
use
Views,
adjacent
transporta:on
infrastructure
&
proper:es,
construc:on
materials
w/
exis:ng
recycle/reuse
poten:al
Human
health
effects
Proximity
of
vulnerable
popula:ons,
adjacent
physical
ac:vity
opp.,
proximity
to
major
sources
of
air
pollu:on
7. NC-‐v4
SSc2:
Site
development
-‐
protect
or
restore
habitat
Op#on
1:
On-‐Site
Restora:on
(2
points
for
non-‐healthcare,
1
for
healthcare)
Using
na:ve
or
adapted
vegeta:on,
restore
30%
(incl.
bldg.
footprint)
of
all
por:ons
of
site
ID’d
as
previously
developed
Restore
all
disturbed
or
compacted
soils
that
will
be
revegetated
w/in
project’s
development
footprint
to
meet
following
requirements:
Soils
must
be
reused
for
func:ons
comparable
to
original
Imported
topsoils/soil
blends
for
topsoil
may
not
incl.
following:
soils
defined
by
NRCS
as
prime
farmland,
unique
farmland,
or
farmland
of
statewide
or
local
importance;
or
soils
fr.
other
greenfield
sites
(unless
those
soils
are
byproduct
of
construc:on
process)
Restored
soil
must
meet
criteria
of
ref.
soils
in
1–3
&
criteria
of
either
4
or
5:
1)
organic
maaer
2)
compac:on
3)
infiltra:on
rates
4)
soil
biological
func:on
5)
soil
chemical
characteris:cs
Projects
that
achieve
a
density
of
1.5
FAR
may
incl.
veg.
roof
in
calcula:on
if
plants
na:ve
or
adapted,
provide
habitat,
&
promote
biodiversity
8. NC-‐v4
SSc2
(con:nued):
Site
development
-‐
protect
or
restore
habitat
Op#on
2:
Financial
Support
(1
point)
Provide
financial
support
to
at
least
$0.40
per
square
foot
($4
per
square
meter)
for
total
site
area
(including
bldg.
footprint)
Financial
support
must
be
provided
to
recognized
land
trust
or
conserva:on
org.
w/in
same
EPA
Level
III
ecoregion
or
project’s
state
(or
w/in
100
miles
of
project
outside
U.S.).
For
U.S.
projects,
land
trust
must
be
accredited
by
Land
Trust
Alliance
9. NC-‐v4
SSc3:
Open
space
To
create
exterior
open
space
encouraging
interac:on
w/
environment,
social
interac:on,
passive
recrea:on,
&
physical
ac:vi:es
(1
point)
Outdoor
space
must
be
physically
accessible
and
be
1+
of
the
following:
Provide
outdoor
space
greater
than
or
equal
to
30%
of
total
site
area
(incl.
building
footprint).
A
minimum
of
25%
of
outdoor
space
must
be
vegetated
(turf
grass
does
not
count)
or
have
overhead
vegetated
canopy
Pedestrian-‐oriented
paving
or
turf
area
w/
site
elements
that
allow
outdoor
social
ac:vi:es
Preserved
or
created
habitat
&
meets
criteria
of
Protect
or
Restore
Habitat
&
incl.
elements
of
human
interac:on
Recrea:on-‐oriented
paving
or
turf
area
w/
site
elements
that
encourage
physical
ac:vity
Garden
space
w/
diversity
of
vegeta:on
types
and
species
that
provide
opportuni:es
for
year-‐round
visual
interest
Garden
space
dedicated
to
community
gardens
or
urban
food
produc:on
10. NC-‐v4
SSc5:
Heat
island
reduc:on
To
minimize
effects
on
microclimates
and
human
and
wildlife
habitats
by
reducing
heat
islands
Op#on
1
(nonroof
&
roof):
(2
points
for
non-‐healthcare,
1
for
healthcare)
Meet
following:
Area
Nonroof
Measures
(0.5)
+
Area
High-‐Reflectance
Roof
(0.75)
+
Area
Vegetated
Roof
(0.75)
≥
Total
Site
Paving
Area
+
Total
Roof
Area
And
use
any
combina:on
of
these
strategies:
High-‐reflectance
roof
w/
low
slope:
≤
2:12,
ini:al
SRI
≥
82
&
3-‐
year
aged
SRI
≥
64
w/
steep
slope:
>
2:12,
ini:al
SRI
≥
39
&
3-‐
year
aged
SRI
≥
32
Install
a
vegetated
roof
Nonroof
measures:
1)
Use
exis:ng
plant
material/install
plants
to
provide
shade
over
paving
areas
w/in
10
yrs
2)
Install
vegetated
planters
3)
Plants
in
place
at
:me
of
occupancy
permit
(no
ar:ficial
turf)
4)
Provide
shade
w/
structures
covered
by
energy-‐genera:on
systems
5)
Provide
shade
w/
architectural
devices
or
structures
that
have
3-‐year-‐aged
SRI
value
of
≥
0.28
6)
If
3-‐yr
value
info
not
avail.,
use
materials
w/
ini:al
SRI
of
≥
0.33
7)
Provide
shade
with
vegetated
structures
8)
Use
paving
materials
w/
3-‐year-‐aged
SRI
value
of
≥
0.28
9)
If
not
avail.,
use
materials
w/
ini:al
SRI
of
≥
0.33
10)
Use
open-‐grid
pavement
system
(≥
50%
unbound)
11. NC-‐v4
SSc5
(con:nued):
Heat
island
reduc:on
To
minimize
effects
on
microclimates
and
human
and
wildlife
habitats
by
reducing
heat
islands
Op#on
2
(parking
under
cover):
(1
point)
Place
a
minimum
of
75%
of
parking
spaces
under
cover.
Any
roof
used
to
shade
or
cover
parking
must:
1)
have
a
three-‐year
aged
SRI
of
at
least
32
(if
three-‐year
aged
value
informa:on
is
not
available,
use
materials
with
an
ini:al
SRI
of
at
least
39
at
installa:on),
or
2)
be
a
vegetated
roof,
or
3)
be
covered
by
energy
genera:on
systems,
such
as
solar
thermal
collectors,
photovoltaics,
and
wind
turbines
12. NC-‐v4
SSc4:
Rainwater
Management
To
reduce
runoff
vol.
&
improve
water
quality
by
replica:ng
site's
natural
hydrology
&
water
balance
based
on
historical
condi:ons
&
region's
undeveloped
ecosystems
Op#on
1
(Percen:le
Of
Rainfall
Events),
Path
1
(95th
percen:le):
(2
points
for
non-‐healthcare,
1
for
healthcare)
Op#on
1
(Percen:le
Of
Rainfall
Events),
Path
2
(98th
percen:le):
(3
points
for
non-‐healthcare,
2
for
healthcare)
Op#on
1
(Percen:le
Of
Rainfall
Events),
Path
3
(Zero
Lot
Line
Projects
Only
–
85th
Percen:le):
(3
points
for
non-‐healthcare,
2
for
healthcare)
Manage
on
site
runoff
from
developed
site
for
95th
percen:le
of
regional
or
local
rainfall
events
using
low-‐
impact
development
(LID)
&
green
infrastructure
Use
daily
rainfall
data
&
methodology
from
EPA
technical
guidance
for
federal
projects
to
determine
95th
percen:le
amount
Achieve
Path
1
but
for
98th
percen:le
of
regional
or
local
rainfall
events,
using
LID
and
green
infrastructure
Applies
to
zero
lot
line
projects
in
urban
areas
w/
min.
density
of
1.5
FAR
Achieve
Path
1
but
for
98th
percen:le
of
regional
or
local
rainfall
events,
using
LID
and
green
infrastructure
13. NC-‐v4
SSc4
(con:nued):
Rainwater
Management
To
reduce
runoff
vol.
&
improve
water
quality
by
replica:ng
site's
natural
hydrology
&
water
balance
based
on
historical
condi:ons
&
region's
undeveloped
ecosystems
Op#on
2
(Natural
land
cover
condi:ons):
(3
points
for
non-‐healthcare,
2
for
healthcare)
Manage
on
site
annual
increase
in
runoff
volume
from
natural
land
cover
condi:on
to
post-‐developed
condi:on
Projects
that
are
part
of
mul:tenant
complex
only:
Credit
requirements
may
be
met
using
coordinated
approach
affec:ng
defined
project
site
w/in
master
plan
boundary.
Distributed
techniques
based
on
watershed
approach
are
then
required.