Weighing Evidence.pdf
•
0 likes•14 views
Introduction to Weighing Evidence in a DIsciplinary Hearing. Factors to consider by Chairperson, Presiding Officer or Commissioner when weighing evidence ina disciplinary hearing or at CCMA.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Download to read offline
Recommended
Evidence Chapter11
Evidence is the foundation of an argument and establishes the accuracy of a claim. There are different types of evidence including precedent, statistical, testimonial, expert witness, and hearsay evidence. The credibility of evidence can be evaluated based on the source's qualifications, potential for bias, factual support provided, and consistency both internally and externally. When using evidence, it must pass tests including recency, sufficiency, logical relevance, internal consistency, and external consistency.
Evidence powerpoint
This document discusses the importance and types of evidence. It defines evidence as supporting material that strengthens arguments and validates claims. There are different types of evidence like precedent, statistical, testimonial, and common knowledge evidence. Evidence is key in courtrooms, where judges determine its legality and juries decide its validity. Lawyers present evidence to persuade while witnesses provide testimony. The amount and types of evidence needed depends on the audience - friendly, neutral, or hostile audiences require different levels of proof. Sources of evidence must also be carefully evaluated for accuracy, bias, and consistency.
Evidence
This document defines evidence and discusses its importance in persuasion. It notes that evidence gives arguments an objective foundation beyond personal opinions. The document outlines different types of evidence including precedent, statistical, testimonial, hearsay, and common knowledge evidence. It discusses how the amount of evidence needed depends on the audience and claim. Overall, the document provides guidance on selecting and using different types of evidence to strengthen arguments and claims.
What Is Evidence?
The document discusses evidence and its importance in arguments. It defines evidence as facts or information that support a claim and cause others to believe it is true. There are five main types of evidence: precedent, statistical, testimonial, hearsay, and common knowledge. Evidence is the foundation of strong arguments and its credibility must be evaluated based on the source and consistency. Critical thinking requires relying on evidence and facts rather than emotions when evaluating arguments and reaching conclusions.
Assessment of evidence
This document discusses evidence and its assessment in legal cases. It defines evidence as the basis for belief or disbelief, and typically includes witness testimony, documents, photographs, and other materials. Evidence must be relevant to the case and admissible in court. There are several types of evidence, such as direct, circumstantial, forensic, and documentary evidence. For evidence to be admitted, it must pass tests for relevance and reliability. Prosecutors must also consider whether there is a realistic prospect of conviction based on the evidence and whether prosecution would be in the public interest based on factors for and against prosecution.
5I.Observer Effects and Examiner BiasChisum and Turvey.docx
5
I. Observer Effects and Examiner Bias
Chisum and Turvey quote Paul L. Kirk, who was a pioneering criminalist, about the interpretation of evidence, “Physical evidence cannot be wrong, it cannot be perjured, it cannot be wholly absent. Only in its interpretation can there be error.” (Chisum, p. 51). This becomes a real issue because a great deal of the evidence we deal with can be interpreted in various ways depending on a number of subjective influences.
A. Observer Effects – Observer effects can be both conscious and subconscious. Both conscious and subconscious needs and expectations shape both our perception of facts and their interpretation. It can affect what is recognized as evidence, what is collected, what is examined, and how it is interpreted. At its most basic, an observer effect is a psychological bias or effect on the observer’s part that distorts how the evidence is recognized, collect, examined, or interpreted. It is often subconscious (below the level of awareness) on the part of the observer and may significantly affect the reconstruction of the crime. We all have them and the question thus becomes, not whether I have them, but how do I guard against them and eliminate their influence on my reconstruction.
B. Potential Observer Effects
1. Ambiguity and Subjectivity – Ambiguity is a factor when evidence or circumstances are incomplete, murky, or equivocal. Subjectivity is a factor when identifications and interpretations rest on the examiner’s experiences or beliefs. They become problematic when the examiner or investigator believes that his experience is all that is required to render an identification. There are at least three areas in reconstruction where subjectivity can show up: 1) evidence collection; 2) evidence quantity and quality; 3) lack of standards for qualifying the results of comparative analysis and identification (Chisum, p. 59). The occurrence of ambiguous physical evidence as well as evidence that is susceptible to subjective interpretation opens the way for subconscious observer effects to affect the results you obtain.
2. Lure of Expectation – We as investigators are often put in situations where we have access to information that can give rise to conscious or unconscious expectations. One of the most common expectations of this type is that the subject must be guilty of something even if they are not guilty of the crime of which they are accused. I once had another officer tell me (in reference to a real thug/scumbag that was a suspect in a homicide) that even if he had not done the crime, to charge him would not be a great miscarriage of justice. We work in a pro-prosecution environment where the suspect’s guilt is suspected and anticipated and this may lead to subconsciously developing pre-examination expectations that may influence the results (Chisum, p. 60).
3. Single Sample Testing – Evidence that is turned over to forensic examiners tends to fall into one of three catetor ...
5I.Observer Effects and Examiner BiasChisum and Turvey.docx
5
I. Observer Effects and Examiner Bias
Chisum and Turvey quote Paul L. Kirk, who was a pioneering criminalist, about the interpretation of evidence, “Physical evidence cannot be wrong, it cannot be perjured, it cannot be wholly absent. Only in its interpretation can there be error.” (Chisum, p. 51). This becomes a real issue because a great deal of the evidence we deal with can be interpreted in various ways depending on a number of subjective influences.
A. Observer Effects – Observer effects can be both conscious and subconscious. Both conscious and subconscious needs and expectations shape both our perception of facts and their interpretation. It can affect what is recognized as evidence, what is collected, what is examined, and how it is interpreted. At its most basic, an observer effect is a psychological bias or effect on the observer’s part that distorts how the evidence is recognized, collect, examined, or interpreted. It is often subconscious (below the level of awareness) on the part of the observer and may significantly affect the reconstruction of the crime. We all have them and the question thus becomes, not whether I have them, but how do I guard against them and eliminate their influence on my reconstruction.
B. Potential Observer Effects
1. Ambiguity and Subjectivity – Ambiguity is a factor when evidence or circumstances are incomplete, murky, or equivocal. Subjectivity is a factor when identifications and interpretations rest on the examiner’s experiences or beliefs. They become problematic when the examiner or investigator believes that his experience is all that is required to render an identification. There are at least three areas in reconstruction where subjectivity can show up: 1) evidence collection; 2) evidence quantity and quality; 3) lack of standards for qualifying the results of comparative analysis and identification (Chisum, p. 59). The occurrence of ambiguous physical evidence as well as evidence that is susceptible to subjective interpretation opens the way for subconscious observer effects to affect the results you obtain.
2. Lure of Expectation – We as investigators are often put in situations where we have access to information that can give rise to conscious or unconscious expectations. One of the most common expectations of this type is that the subject must be guilty of something even if they are not guilty of the crime of which they are accused. I once had another officer tell me (in reference to a real thug/scumbag that was a suspect in a homicide) that even if he had not done the crime, to charge him would not be a great miscarriage of justice. We work in a pro-prosecution environment where the suspect’s guilt is suspected and anticipated and this may lead to subconsciously developing pre-examination expectations that may influence the results (Chisum, p. 60).
3. Single Sample Testing – Evidence that is turned over to forensic examiners tends to fall into one of three catetor.
Recommended
Evidence Chapter11
Evidence is the foundation of an argument and establishes the accuracy of a claim. There are different types of evidence including precedent, statistical, testimonial, expert witness, and hearsay evidence. The credibility of evidence can be evaluated based on the source's qualifications, potential for bias, factual support provided, and consistency both internally and externally. When using evidence, it must pass tests including recency, sufficiency, logical relevance, internal consistency, and external consistency.
Evidence powerpoint
This document discusses the importance and types of evidence. It defines evidence as supporting material that strengthens arguments and validates claims. There are different types of evidence like precedent, statistical, testimonial, and common knowledge evidence. Evidence is key in courtrooms, where judges determine its legality and juries decide its validity. Lawyers present evidence to persuade while witnesses provide testimony. The amount and types of evidence needed depends on the audience - friendly, neutral, or hostile audiences require different levels of proof. Sources of evidence must also be carefully evaluated for accuracy, bias, and consistency.
Evidence
This document defines evidence and discusses its importance in persuasion. It notes that evidence gives arguments an objective foundation beyond personal opinions. The document outlines different types of evidence including precedent, statistical, testimonial, hearsay, and common knowledge evidence. It discusses how the amount of evidence needed depends on the audience and claim. Overall, the document provides guidance on selecting and using different types of evidence to strengthen arguments and claims.
What Is Evidence?
The document discusses evidence and its importance in arguments. It defines evidence as facts or information that support a claim and cause others to believe it is true. There are five main types of evidence: precedent, statistical, testimonial, hearsay, and common knowledge. Evidence is the foundation of strong arguments and its credibility must be evaluated based on the source and consistency. Critical thinking requires relying on evidence and facts rather than emotions when evaluating arguments and reaching conclusions.
Assessment of evidence
This document discusses evidence and its assessment in legal cases. It defines evidence as the basis for belief or disbelief, and typically includes witness testimony, documents, photographs, and other materials. Evidence must be relevant to the case and admissible in court. There are several types of evidence, such as direct, circumstantial, forensic, and documentary evidence. For evidence to be admitted, it must pass tests for relevance and reliability. Prosecutors must also consider whether there is a realistic prospect of conviction based on the evidence and whether prosecution would be in the public interest based on factors for and against prosecution.
5I.Observer Effects and Examiner BiasChisum and Turvey.docx
5
I. Observer Effects and Examiner Bias
Chisum and Turvey quote Paul L. Kirk, who was a pioneering criminalist, about the interpretation of evidence, “Physical evidence cannot be wrong, it cannot be perjured, it cannot be wholly absent. Only in its interpretation can there be error.” (Chisum, p. 51). This becomes a real issue because a great deal of the evidence we deal with can be interpreted in various ways depending on a number of subjective influences.
A. Observer Effects – Observer effects can be both conscious and subconscious. Both conscious and subconscious needs and expectations shape both our perception of facts and their interpretation. It can affect what is recognized as evidence, what is collected, what is examined, and how it is interpreted. At its most basic, an observer effect is a psychological bias or effect on the observer’s part that distorts how the evidence is recognized, collect, examined, or interpreted. It is often subconscious (below the level of awareness) on the part of the observer and may significantly affect the reconstruction of the crime. We all have them and the question thus becomes, not whether I have them, but how do I guard against them and eliminate their influence on my reconstruction.
B. Potential Observer Effects
1. Ambiguity and Subjectivity – Ambiguity is a factor when evidence or circumstances are incomplete, murky, or equivocal. Subjectivity is a factor when identifications and interpretations rest on the examiner’s experiences or beliefs. They become problematic when the examiner or investigator believes that his experience is all that is required to render an identification. There are at least three areas in reconstruction where subjectivity can show up: 1) evidence collection; 2) evidence quantity and quality; 3) lack of standards for qualifying the results of comparative analysis and identification (Chisum, p. 59). The occurrence of ambiguous physical evidence as well as evidence that is susceptible to subjective interpretation opens the way for subconscious observer effects to affect the results you obtain.
2. Lure of Expectation – We as investigators are often put in situations where we have access to information that can give rise to conscious or unconscious expectations. One of the most common expectations of this type is that the subject must be guilty of something even if they are not guilty of the crime of which they are accused. I once had another officer tell me (in reference to a real thug/scumbag that was a suspect in a homicide) that even if he had not done the crime, to charge him would not be a great miscarriage of justice. We work in a pro-prosecution environment where the suspect’s guilt is suspected and anticipated and this may lead to subconsciously developing pre-examination expectations that may influence the results (Chisum, p. 60).
3. Single Sample Testing – Evidence that is turned over to forensic examiners tends to fall into one of three catetor ...
5I.Observer Effects and Examiner BiasChisum and Turvey.docx
5
I. Observer Effects and Examiner Bias
Chisum and Turvey quote Paul L. Kirk, who was a pioneering criminalist, about the interpretation of evidence, “Physical evidence cannot be wrong, it cannot be perjured, it cannot be wholly absent. Only in its interpretation can there be error.” (Chisum, p. 51). This becomes a real issue because a great deal of the evidence we deal with can be interpreted in various ways depending on a number of subjective influences.
A. Observer Effects – Observer effects can be both conscious and subconscious. Both conscious and subconscious needs and expectations shape both our perception of facts and their interpretation. It can affect what is recognized as evidence, what is collected, what is examined, and how it is interpreted. At its most basic, an observer effect is a psychological bias or effect on the observer’s part that distorts how the evidence is recognized, collect, examined, or interpreted. It is often subconscious (below the level of awareness) on the part of the observer and may significantly affect the reconstruction of the crime. We all have them and the question thus becomes, not whether I have them, but how do I guard against them and eliminate their influence on my reconstruction.
B. Potential Observer Effects
1. Ambiguity and Subjectivity – Ambiguity is a factor when evidence or circumstances are incomplete, murky, or equivocal. Subjectivity is a factor when identifications and interpretations rest on the examiner’s experiences or beliefs. They become problematic when the examiner or investigator believes that his experience is all that is required to render an identification. There are at least three areas in reconstruction where subjectivity can show up: 1) evidence collection; 2) evidence quantity and quality; 3) lack of standards for qualifying the results of comparative analysis and identification (Chisum, p. 59). The occurrence of ambiguous physical evidence as well as evidence that is susceptible to subjective interpretation opens the way for subconscious observer effects to affect the results you obtain.
2. Lure of Expectation – We as investigators are often put in situations where we have access to information that can give rise to conscious or unconscious expectations. One of the most common expectations of this type is that the subject must be guilty of something even if they are not guilty of the crime of which they are accused. I once had another officer tell me (in reference to a real thug/scumbag that was a suspect in a homicide) that even if he had not done the crime, to charge him would not be a great miscarriage of justice. We work in a pro-prosecution environment where the suspect’s guilt is suspected and anticipated and this may lead to subconsciously developing pre-examination expectations that may influence the results (Chisum, p. 60).
3. Single Sample Testing – Evidence that is turned over to forensic examiners tends to fall into one of three catetor.
Medical Evidence
This document discusses different forms of medical evidence that can be presented in court, including real evidence like objects or autopsy reports, testimonial evidence through physician testimony, experimental evidence through demonstrations, and documentary evidence like medical records. It also outlines methods for preserving evidence, such as photography or sketches. The standard of proof in civil cases is preponderance of evidence, meaning the evidence that outweighs the other side. In criminal cases, guilt must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. Factors like witness credibility and circumstances are considered in determining which evidence preponderates.
The Sentencing Hearing
The document summarizes key information about evidence admissibility and sentencing considerations in criminal proceedings. It discusses:
- What evidence from the trial and additional information can be presented at sentencing.
- Standards for admitting hearsay, similar fact, medical reports and victim impact statements.
- Factors considered in pre-sentence reports and sexual behaviour assessments.
- The offender's right to speak and how mitigating/aggravating factors, concurrent/consecutive sentences, and conditional/incarceration sentences determine the proper sentencing range.
LLB LAW NOTES ON LAW OF EVIDENCE
LLB LAW NOTES ON LAW OF EVIDENCE
FREE AFFIDAVITS AND NOTICES FORMATS
FREE AGREEMENTS AND CONTRACTS FORMATS
FREE LLB LAW NOTES
FREE CA ICWA NOTES
FREE LLB LAW FIRST SEM NOTES
FREE LLB LAW SECOND SEM NOTES
FREE LLB LAW THIRD SEM NOTES
FREE LLB LAW FOURTH SEM NOTES
FREE LLB LAW FIFTH SEM NOTES
FREE LLB LAW SIXTH SEM NOTES
FREE CA ICWA FOUNDATION NOTES
FREE CA ICWA INTERMEDIATE NOTES
FREE CA ICWA FINAL NOTES
KANOON KE RAKHWALE INDIA
HIRE LAWYER ONLINE
LAW FIRMS IN DELHI
CA FIRM DELHI
VISIT : https://www.kanoonkerakhwale.com/
VISIT : https://hirelawyeronline.com/
What does affidavit mean.pdf
This article examines the idea and importance of an affidavit in court cases. A written declaration issued under oath or affirmation known as a “affidavit” provides factual data or evidence pertinent to a lawsuit. It is a useful tool for people to back up their assertions,
Examination in chief - By Shivaranjani
This document discusses different types of examinations in a criminal court case. It explains that in the examination in chief, the lawyer questioning the witness is trying to elicit favorable facts for their case. In cross examination, the opposing lawyer questions the witness to test the accuracy of their statements, modify or explain previous answers, discredit the witness, and reveal any inconsistencies or biases. Objections can be raised by opposing lawyers during questioning, and witnesses should not answer until the judge rules on the objection.
Evidence 2
Rules of evidence are complex and found in both common and statute law. There are different types of evidence such as direct, circumstantial, privileged communications, similar fact, hearsay, opinion, character, photographs, electronic devices, polygraph tests, confessions, and illegally obtained evidence. For each type of evidence, there are specific rules regarding their admissibility in court.
Evidence In The Criminal Courts
Rules of evidence are complex and found in both common and statute law. There are different types of evidence such as direct evidence, which directly proves a fact, and circumstantial evidence, which relies on inferences to conclude facts. Privileged communications between certain relationships like lawyer-client cannot be disclosed. Similar fact evidence and hearsay have restrictions on their admission due to potential prejudice or reliability. Character evidence is limited and expert opinion must be necessary and outside the jury's knowledge. Photographs and recordings require proper handling and warrant to be admitted. Confessions require informing individuals of their rights. Illegally obtained evidence may be excluded if it discredits the justice system.
Evidence In The Criminal Courts
Rules of evidence are complex and found in both common and statute law. There are different types of evidence such as direct evidence, which directly proves a fact, and circumstantial evidence, which relies on inferences to conclude facts. Privileged communications between certain relationships like lawyer-client cannot be disclosed. Similar fact evidence and hearsay have restrictions on their admission due to potential prejudice or reliability. Character evidence is limited and expert opinion must be necessary and outside the jury's knowledge. Photographs and recordings require proper handling and warrant to be admitted. Confessions require informing individuals of their rights. Illegally obtained evidence may be rejected if it harms justice.
3 -2 t4-chapter_three_powerpoint_w_teays
This document provides guidance on analyzing arguments and articles through critical thinking. It discusses evaluating evidence, including facts, testimony, statistics, and different types of reasoning. It provides a checklist for weighing evidence and outlines how to structure an analysis. Key points include examining an argument's thesis, approach, claims, and quality of support, as well as looking for bias, assumptions, and weaknesses in the reasoning. The goal is to assess how convincingly the case is made and determine if it is persuasive.
Rules of Evidence Lectures for Reviewees
This document discusses the importance and role of evidence in criminal law and law enforcement. It covers key topics such as:
- Evidence is crucial for proving guilt or innocence in criminal cases and for developing legal strategies.
- Different types of evidence, such as physical evidence, can help determine how a crime was committed, connect suspects to crimes, or clear innocent persons.
- Evidence must meet standards of relevance and competency to be admissible in court. It must be material and have probative value regarding the facts at issue.
- Different burdens and standards of proof apply depending on if a case is criminal, civil, or administrative. Criminal cases require proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
Useful article on evidence act
This document provides an overview of key concepts related to the analysis of evidence in civil and criminal cases under Indian law. It discusses topics such as the definition of evidence, relevance of evidence, admissibility of evidence, direct and indirect evidence, oral and documentary evidence, presumptions related to documents, and basic principles for appreciating evidence in criminal cases. The document is an educational resource that examines important evidentiary rules and guidelines for evaluating different types of evidence in legal proceedings.
Evidence
This document discusses different types of evidence used in law, including direct evidence like witness testimony, and physical evidence like tangible objects collected from crime scenes. It explains that evidence can prove a crime was committed, corroborate statements, and help reconstruct events. Both direct and circumstantial evidence can establish facts, but circumstantial evidence implies events rather than directly proving them. The credibility of expert witnesses and admissibility of evidence is determined based on standards like Frye and Daubert.
Https _ecf.okwd.uscourts.gov_cgi-bin_show_temp.pl_file=1708178-0--893
HERE IS THE ACTUAL VERDICT OF NOT GUILTY FOR THE FEREAL WEAPONS CHARGE. ONLY 2% OF ANY FEDERAL CHARGE IS EVER WON! JUSTICE WAS SERVED!
CHARLES DYER'S NOT GUILTY VERDICT FOR THE FEDERAL WEAPONS CHARGE!
Charles Dyer was set up by a member of the ARM , American Resistance Movement, by giving him what appeared to be a grenade launcher. This type of weapon is legal for Charles to won do o his firearm military training. This is the case documents of his federal charge of having a stolen military weapon in his possession. Charles demanded a jury trial. The jury found Charles not guilty!
Chapter 21 - The Investigator and the Legal System1.docx
Chapter 21 - The Investigator and the Legal System
1
The decisions investigators must make involve a great deal of discretion.
Investigators must consider what may be termed risk factors.
2
Investigators must consider what may be termed risk factors.
Some police officers and criminal investigators are not fully aware of the order in
3
which a trial is conducted because time often prohibits them from attending a
complete trail from beginning to end. Also, witnesses are often sequestered from
the courtroom before and after giving testimony. This very common practice is used
to minimize the possibility that a witness’s testimony might be affected by other
witnesses’ testimony.
The courtroom process begins with the selection and swearing in of a jury. Jury
selection can last a few hours or a few weeks, depending on the selection process
and the nature of the case. The jury panel from whom the jurors in the trial will
eventually be picked is called a venire.
The steps in the trial process include: direct examination, cross-examination,
redirect examination, re-cross examination, the rebuttal, surrebuttal, and closing
arguments.
Evidence can be defined as anything that tends logically to prove or disprove
a fact at issue in a judicial case or controversy.
4
a fact at issue in a judicial case or controversy.
The rules of evidence are designed primarily to keep a jury from hearing or
seeing improper evidence, and the first rule of evidence is designed to set
parameters on the above definition of evidence.
Proof may be defined as the combination of all those facts—of all the evidence—in
5
determining the guilt or innocence of a person accused of a crime.
The pie chart above illustrates how several different pieces of evidence can
be put together in order to constitute proof of guilt.
6
be put together in order to constitute proof of guilt.
The doctrine of judicial notice is an evidentiary shortcut. Judicial notice is designed
7
to speed up the trial and eliminate the necessity of formally proving the truth of a
particular matter when the truth is not in dispute.
Direct Evidence
8
Direct evidence usually is the testimony of witnesses that ties the defendant
directly to the commission of the crime, such as the testimony of an
eyewitness who can positively state that the defendant committed the crime.
Real Evidence
Sometimes referred to as “physical evidence,” real evidence is connected
with the commission of the crime and can be produced in court.
Demonstrative Evidence
Demonstrative, or illustrative, evidence is not identical to real evidence even
though the items introduced are tangible. It consists of maps, diagrams,
sketches, photographs, tape recordings, videotapes, X-rays, and visual tests
and demonstrations produced to assist witnesses in explaining their
testimony.
Circumstantial Evidence
9
It is a myth that one cannot be convicted of a crime solely o.
Truth vs. Validity
This document discusses the difference between truth and validity in critical thinking. Truth is defined as accurately describing reality, whereas validity is a measurement of how certain we are of a situation. There can be many valid positions, but only one truth. Science and law use validity rather than absolute truth, as validity allows for changing views with new evidence, while truth cannot change. The key difference is that validity is based on external facts and evidence, while truth is determined internally.
Distinguish between fact and opinion
This document distinguishes between facts and opinions. It states that facts are verifiable statements about events or information that are supported by evidence, while opinions are subjective judgments that cannot be proven true or false and are influenced by personal views. The key differences outlined are that facts rely on evidence and research, represent objective reality, and are universal, whereas opinions are subjective, vary between individuals, and are open to debate.
Explain the relevance of the rules against hearsay to digital eviden.pdf
Explain the relevance of the rules against hearsay to digital evidence. Why is digital evidence
considered hearsay and what can be done to limit that characterization?
Solution
Hearsay Rule provides the closest thing to it, stating that hearsay is a statement, other than one
made by a declarant while testifying at the trial or hearing, afforded in evidence to prove the
truth of the matter asserted .
As such, the rule’s purpose is aimed at prohibiting the use of a person’s assertion, as equivalent
to testimony to the fact asserted, unless the assertor is brought to testify in court where he may be
placed under oath and cross-examined.
Basically then, hearsay consists of reported statements that can’t be verified because it is nothing
more than an assertion. In order to shift assertion to fact, reliable evidence and testimony needs
to be brought to bear on the assertion. The only way that the reliability of such information can
be established is for the person who made the original statement (in speech or writing) to testify
under oath in court as to the nature of the statement, the context in which it was made, and the
meaning of the statement to him- or herself. Otherwise the statement is mere assertion with no
provable truth-value and cannot stand as evidence in court.
The term “hearsay” typically elicits the idea of speech in lay thought, but the Hearsay Rule
specifically refers to “statements,” which can be either written or spoken. This focus on
“statement” applies to electronic evidence in two ways: 1) emails, text messages, and computer
generated reports are text based; 2) digital video and audio recordings capture spoken utterance
or other nonverbal conduct “expressly intended to be an assertion” that can be considered
statements. Thus, just as with paper documents, in order to determine whether the content of
electronic documents is hearsay or fact, the author must testify under oath and submit to cross-
examination in order to determine whether the content is fact and can stand as evidence. In this,
we see that as with any other proof of admissibility for electronic evidence, the burden of proof
still stands with witnesses who can make an accounting for the content of the document in court
.This said, there are certain documents–electronic or traditional–that automatically do not count
as hearsay and therefore stand as evidence in court. These include:
computer generated reports
business records
public records (e.g., birth, death, or marriage certificates)
excited utterances–“a statement relateing to a startling event or condition made while the
declarant ws under the stress or excitement caused by the event or condition” (FED. R. EVID.
803 (2) as cited in Lorraine v. Markel, Pp. 70).
family records
statements of “then existing state of mind or condition”–“A statement of the declarant’s then
existing state of mind, emotion, sensation, or physical condition, but not including a statement of
memory or belief to prove the fact remembere.
THE NEED FOR EVIDENCE Almost all reasoning we encounter includes bel.docx
THE NEED FOR EVIDENCE Almost all reasoning we encounter includes beliefs about the way the world was, is, or is going to be that the communicator wants us to accept as “facts.” These beliefs can be conclusions, reasons, or assumptions. We can refer to such beliefs as factual claims. The first question you should ask about a factual claim is, “Why should I believe it?” Your next question is, “Does the claim need evidence to support it?” If it does, and if there is no evidence, the claim is a mere assertion, meaning a claim that is not backed up in any way. You should seriously question the dependability of mere assertions! If there is evidence, your next question is, “How good is the evidence?” To evaluate reasoning, we need to remember that some factual claims can be counted on more than others. For example, you probably feel quite certain that the claim “most U.S. senators are men” is true, but less certain that the assertion “practicing yoga reduces the risk of cancer” is true. Because it is extremely difficult, if not impossible, to establish the absolute truth or falsity of most claims, rather than asking whether they are true, we prefer to ask whether they are dependable. In essence, we want to ask, “Can we count on such beliefs?” The greater the quality and quantity of evidence supporting a claim, the more we can depend on it, and the more we can call the claim a “fact.” For example, abundant evidence exists that George Washington was the first president of the United States of America. Thus, we can treat that claim as a fact. On the other hand, there is much conflicting evidence for the belief “bottled water is safer to drink than tap water.” We thus can’t treat this belief as a fact. The major difference between claims that are opinions and those that are facts is the present state of the relevant evidence. The more supporting evidence there is for a belief, the more “factual” the belief becomes. Before we judge the persuasiveness of a communication, we need to know which factual claims are most dependable. How do we determine dependability? We ask questions like the following: What is your proof? How do you know that’s true? Where’s the evidence? Why do you believe that? Are you sure that’s true? Can you prove it? You will be well on your way to being among the best critical thinkers when you develop the habit of regularly asking these questions. They require those making arguments to be responsible by revealing the basis for their arguments. Anyone with an argument that you should consider will not hesitate to answer these questions. They know they have substantial support for their claims and, consequently, will want to share their evidence in the hope that you will learn to share their conclusions. When people react to simple requests for evidence with anger or withdrawal, they usually do so because they are embarrassed as they realize that, without evidence, they should have been less assertive about their beliefs. When we regula.
Evidence!!
The document discusses the importance of evidence in supporting arguments and speeches. It defines evidence as specific instances, testimony, and proof that help establish credibility and sway an audience. There are three main types of evidence: statistical evidence which communicates facts without citing each instance; testimony evidence from professionals supporting a claim; and legal precedent evidence from past court rulings that may aid a similar case. For evidence to be strong, it cannot be falsified, must come from reliable sources, and should answer all audience questions without leaving doubts.
Integrating Advocacy and Legal Tactics to Tackle Online Consumer Complaints
Our company bridges the gap between registered users and experienced advocates, offering a user-friendly online platform for seamless interaction. This platform empowers users to voice their grievances, particularly regarding online consumer issues. We streamline support by utilizing our team of expert advocates to provide consultancy services and initiate appropriate legal actions.
Our Online Consumer Legal Forum offers comprehensive guidance to individuals and businesses facing consumer complaints. With a dedicated team, round-the-clock support, and efficient complaint management, we are the preferred solution for addressing consumer grievances.
Our intuitive online interface allows individuals to register complaints, seek legal advice, and pursue justice conveniently. Users can submit complaints via mobile devices and send legal notices to companies directly through our portal.
一比一原版多伦多都会大学毕业证(TMU毕业证书)学历如何办理
原版办【微信号:95270640】【多伦多都会大学毕业证(TMU毕业证书)】【微信号:95270640】《成绩单、外壳、雅思、offer、真实留信官方学历认证（永久存档/真实可查）》采用学校原版纸张、特殊工艺完全按照原版一比一制作（包括：隐形水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠，文字图案浮雕，激光镭射，紫外荧光，温感，复印防伪）行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备，十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，业务范围有加拿大、英国、澳洲、韩国、美国、新加坡，新西兰等学历材料，包您满意。
【我们承诺采用的是学校原版纸张（纸质、底色、纹路）我们拥有全套进口原装设备，特殊工艺都是采用不同机器制作，仿真度基本可以达到100%，所有工艺效果都可提前给客户展示，不满意可以根据客户要求进行调整，直到满意为止！】
【业务选择办理准则】
一、工作未确定，回国需先给父母、亲戚朋友看下文凭的情况，办理一份就读学校的毕业证【微信号95270640】文凭即可
二、回国进私企、外企、自己做生意的情况，这些单位是不查询毕业证真伪的，而且国内没有渠道去查询国外文凭的真假，也不需要提供真实教育部认证。鉴于此，办理一份毕业证【微信号95270640】即可
三、进国企，银行，事业单位，考公务员等等，这些单位是必需要提供真实教育部认证的，办理教育部认证所需资料众多且烦琐，所有材料您都必须提供原件，我们凭借丰富的经验，快捷的绿色通道帮您快速整合材料，让您少走弯路。
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
留信网服务项目：
1、留学生专业人才库服务（留信分析）
2、国（境）学习人员提供就业推荐信服务
3、留学人员区块链存储服务
【关于价格问题（保证一手价格）】
我们所定的价格是非常合理的，而且我们现在做得单子大多数都是代理和回头客户介绍的所以一般现在有新的单子 我给客户的都是第一手的代理价格，因为我想坦诚对待大家 不想跟大家在价格方面浪费时间
对于老客户或者被老客户介绍过来的朋友，我们都会适当给一些优惠。
选择实体注册公司办理，更放心，更安全！我们的承诺：客户在留信官方认证查询网站查询到认证通过结果后付款，不成功不收费！
More Related Content
Similar to Weighing Evidence.pdf
Medical Evidence
This document discusses different forms of medical evidence that can be presented in court, including real evidence like objects or autopsy reports, testimonial evidence through physician testimony, experimental evidence through demonstrations, and documentary evidence like medical records. It also outlines methods for preserving evidence, such as photography or sketches. The standard of proof in civil cases is preponderance of evidence, meaning the evidence that outweighs the other side. In criminal cases, guilt must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. Factors like witness credibility and circumstances are considered in determining which evidence preponderates.
The Sentencing Hearing
The document summarizes key information about evidence admissibility and sentencing considerations in criminal proceedings. It discusses:
- What evidence from the trial and additional information can be presented at sentencing.
- Standards for admitting hearsay, similar fact, medical reports and victim impact statements.
- Factors considered in pre-sentence reports and sexual behaviour assessments.
- The offender's right to speak and how mitigating/aggravating factors, concurrent/consecutive sentences, and conditional/incarceration sentences determine the proper sentencing range.
LLB LAW NOTES ON LAW OF EVIDENCE
LLB LAW NOTES ON LAW OF EVIDENCE
FREE AFFIDAVITS AND NOTICES FORMATS
FREE AGREEMENTS AND CONTRACTS FORMATS
FREE LLB LAW NOTES
FREE CA ICWA NOTES
FREE LLB LAW FIRST SEM NOTES
FREE LLB LAW SECOND SEM NOTES
FREE LLB LAW THIRD SEM NOTES
FREE LLB LAW FOURTH SEM NOTES
FREE LLB LAW FIFTH SEM NOTES
FREE LLB LAW SIXTH SEM NOTES
FREE CA ICWA FOUNDATION NOTES
FREE CA ICWA INTERMEDIATE NOTES
FREE CA ICWA FINAL NOTES
KANOON KE RAKHWALE INDIA
HIRE LAWYER ONLINE
LAW FIRMS IN DELHI
CA FIRM DELHI
VISIT : https://www.kanoonkerakhwale.com/
VISIT : https://hirelawyeronline.com/
What does affidavit mean.pdf
This article examines the idea and importance of an affidavit in court cases. A written declaration issued under oath or affirmation known as a “affidavit” provides factual data or evidence pertinent to a lawsuit. It is a useful tool for people to back up their assertions,
Examination in chief - By Shivaranjani
This document discusses different types of examinations in a criminal court case. It explains that in the examination in chief, the lawyer questioning the witness is trying to elicit favorable facts for their case. In cross examination, the opposing lawyer questions the witness to test the accuracy of their statements, modify or explain previous answers, discredit the witness, and reveal any inconsistencies or biases. Objections can be raised by opposing lawyers during questioning, and witnesses should not answer until the judge rules on the objection.
Evidence 2
Rules of evidence are complex and found in both common and statute law. There are different types of evidence such as direct, circumstantial, privileged communications, similar fact, hearsay, opinion, character, photographs, electronic devices, polygraph tests, confessions, and illegally obtained evidence. For each type of evidence, there are specific rules regarding their admissibility in court.
Evidence In The Criminal Courts
Rules of evidence are complex and found in both common and statute law. There are different types of evidence such as direct evidence, which directly proves a fact, and circumstantial evidence, which relies on inferences to conclude facts. Privileged communications between certain relationships like lawyer-client cannot be disclosed. Similar fact evidence and hearsay have restrictions on their admission due to potential prejudice or reliability. Character evidence is limited and expert opinion must be necessary and outside the jury's knowledge. Photographs and recordings require proper handling and warrant to be admitted. Confessions require informing individuals of their rights. Illegally obtained evidence may be excluded if it discredits the justice system.
Evidence In The Criminal Courts
Rules of evidence are complex and found in both common and statute law. There are different types of evidence such as direct evidence, which directly proves a fact, and circumstantial evidence, which relies on inferences to conclude facts. Privileged communications between certain relationships like lawyer-client cannot be disclosed. Similar fact evidence and hearsay have restrictions on their admission due to potential prejudice or reliability. Character evidence is limited and expert opinion must be necessary and outside the jury's knowledge. Photographs and recordings require proper handling and warrant to be admitted. Confessions require informing individuals of their rights. Illegally obtained evidence may be rejected if it harms justice.
3 -2 t4-chapter_three_powerpoint_w_teays
This document provides guidance on analyzing arguments and articles through critical thinking. It discusses evaluating evidence, including facts, testimony, statistics, and different types of reasoning. It provides a checklist for weighing evidence and outlines how to structure an analysis. Key points include examining an argument's thesis, approach, claims, and quality of support, as well as looking for bias, assumptions, and weaknesses in the reasoning. The goal is to assess how convincingly the case is made and determine if it is persuasive.
Rules of Evidence Lectures for Reviewees
This document discusses the importance and role of evidence in criminal law and law enforcement. It covers key topics such as:
- Evidence is crucial for proving guilt or innocence in criminal cases and for developing legal strategies.
- Different types of evidence, such as physical evidence, can help determine how a crime was committed, connect suspects to crimes, or clear innocent persons.
- Evidence must meet standards of relevance and competency to be admissible in court. It must be material and have probative value regarding the facts at issue.
- Different burdens and standards of proof apply depending on if a case is criminal, civil, or administrative. Criminal cases require proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
Useful article on evidence act
This document provides an overview of key concepts related to the analysis of evidence in civil and criminal cases under Indian law. It discusses topics such as the definition of evidence, relevance of evidence, admissibility of evidence, direct and indirect evidence, oral and documentary evidence, presumptions related to documents, and basic principles for appreciating evidence in criminal cases. The document is an educational resource that examines important evidentiary rules and guidelines for evaluating different types of evidence in legal proceedings.
Evidence
This document discusses different types of evidence used in law, including direct evidence like witness testimony, and physical evidence like tangible objects collected from crime scenes. It explains that evidence can prove a crime was committed, corroborate statements, and help reconstruct events. Both direct and circumstantial evidence can establish facts, but circumstantial evidence implies events rather than directly proving them. The credibility of expert witnesses and admissibility of evidence is determined based on standards like Frye and Daubert.
Https _ecf.okwd.uscourts.gov_cgi-bin_show_temp.pl_file=1708178-0--893
HERE IS THE ACTUAL VERDICT OF NOT GUILTY FOR THE FEREAL WEAPONS CHARGE. ONLY 2% OF ANY FEDERAL CHARGE IS EVER WON! JUSTICE WAS SERVED!
CHARLES DYER'S NOT GUILTY VERDICT FOR THE FEDERAL WEAPONS CHARGE!
Charles Dyer was set up by a member of the ARM , American Resistance Movement, by giving him what appeared to be a grenade launcher. This type of weapon is legal for Charles to won do o his firearm military training. This is the case documents of his federal charge of having a stolen military weapon in his possession. Charles demanded a jury trial. The jury found Charles not guilty!
Chapter 21 - The Investigator and the Legal System1.docx
Chapter 21 - The Investigator and the Legal System
1
The decisions investigators must make involve a great deal of discretion.
Investigators must consider what may be termed risk factors.
2
Investigators must consider what may be termed risk factors.
Some police officers and criminal investigators are not fully aware of the order in
3
which a trial is conducted because time often prohibits them from attending a
complete trail from beginning to end. Also, witnesses are often sequestered from
the courtroom before and after giving testimony. This very common practice is used
to minimize the possibility that a witness’s testimony might be affected by other
witnesses’ testimony.
The courtroom process begins with the selection and swearing in of a jury. Jury
selection can last a few hours or a few weeks, depending on the selection process
and the nature of the case. The jury panel from whom the jurors in the trial will
eventually be picked is called a venire.
The steps in the trial process include: direct examination, cross-examination,
redirect examination, re-cross examination, the rebuttal, surrebuttal, and closing
arguments.
Evidence can be defined as anything that tends logically to prove or disprove
a fact at issue in a judicial case or controversy.
4
a fact at issue in a judicial case or controversy.
The rules of evidence are designed primarily to keep a jury from hearing or
seeing improper evidence, and the first rule of evidence is designed to set
parameters on the above definition of evidence.
Proof may be defined as the combination of all those facts—of all the evidence—in
5
determining the guilt or innocence of a person accused of a crime.
The pie chart above illustrates how several different pieces of evidence can
be put together in order to constitute proof of guilt.
6
be put together in order to constitute proof of guilt.
The doctrine of judicial notice is an evidentiary shortcut. Judicial notice is designed
7
to speed up the trial and eliminate the necessity of formally proving the truth of a
particular matter when the truth is not in dispute.
Direct Evidence
8
Direct evidence usually is the testimony of witnesses that ties the defendant
directly to the commission of the crime, such as the testimony of an
eyewitness who can positively state that the defendant committed the crime.
Real Evidence
Sometimes referred to as “physical evidence,” real evidence is connected
with the commission of the crime and can be produced in court.
Demonstrative Evidence
Demonstrative, or illustrative, evidence is not identical to real evidence even
though the items introduced are tangible. It consists of maps, diagrams,
sketches, photographs, tape recordings, videotapes, X-rays, and visual tests
and demonstrations produced to assist witnesses in explaining their
testimony.
Circumstantial Evidence
9
It is a myth that one cannot be convicted of a crime solely o.
Truth vs. Validity
This document discusses the difference between truth and validity in critical thinking. Truth is defined as accurately describing reality, whereas validity is a measurement of how certain we are of a situation. There can be many valid positions, but only one truth. Science and law use validity rather than absolute truth, as validity allows for changing views with new evidence, while truth cannot change. The key difference is that validity is based on external facts and evidence, while truth is determined internally.
Distinguish between fact and opinion
This document distinguishes between facts and opinions. It states that facts are verifiable statements about events or information that are supported by evidence, while opinions are subjective judgments that cannot be proven true or false and are influenced by personal views. The key differences outlined are that facts rely on evidence and research, represent objective reality, and are universal, whereas opinions are subjective, vary between individuals, and are open to debate.
Explain the relevance of the rules against hearsay to digital eviden.pdf
Explain the relevance of the rules against hearsay to digital evidence. Why is digital evidence
considered hearsay and what can be done to limit that characterization?
Solution
Hearsay Rule provides the closest thing to it, stating that hearsay is a statement, other than one
made by a declarant while testifying at the trial or hearing, afforded in evidence to prove the
truth of the matter asserted .
As such, the rule’s purpose is aimed at prohibiting the use of a person’s assertion, as equivalent
to testimony to the fact asserted, unless the assertor is brought to testify in court where he may be
placed under oath and cross-examined.
Basically then, hearsay consists of reported statements that can’t be verified because it is nothing
more than an assertion. In order to shift assertion to fact, reliable evidence and testimony needs
to be brought to bear on the assertion. The only way that the reliability of such information can
be established is for the person who made the original statement (in speech or writing) to testify
under oath in court as to the nature of the statement, the context in which it was made, and the
meaning of the statement to him- or herself. Otherwise the statement is mere assertion with no
provable truth-value and cannot stand as evidence in court.
The term “hearsay” typically elicits the idea of speech in lay thought, but the Hearsay Rule
specifically refers to “statements,” which can be either written or spoken. This focus on
“statement” applies to electronic evidence in two ways: 1) emails, text messages, and computer
generated reports are text based; 2) digital video and audio recordings capture spoken utterance
or other nonverbal conduct “expressly intended to be an assertion” that can be considered
statements. Thus, just as with paper documents, in order to determine whether the content of
electronic documents is hearsay or fact, the author must testify under oath and submit to cross-
examination in order to determine whether the content is fact and can stand as evidence. In this,
we see that as with any other proof of admissibility for electronic evidence, the burden of proof
still stands with witnesses who can make an accounting for the content of the document in court
.This said, there are certain documents–electronic or traditional–that automatically do not count
as hearsay and therefore stand as evidence in court. These include:
computer generated reports
business records
public records (e.g., birth, death, or marriage certificates)
excited utterances–“a statement relateing to a startling event or condition made while the
declarant ws under the stress or excitement caused by the event or condition” (FED. R. EVID.
803 (2) as cited in Lorraine v. Markel, Pp. 70).
family records
statements of “then existing state of mind or condition”–“A statement of the declarant’s then
existing state of mind, emotion, sensation, or physical condition, but not including a statement of
memory or belief to prove the fact remembere.
THE NEED FOR EVIDENCE Almost all reasoning we encounter includes bel.docx
THE NEED FOR EVIDENCE Almost all reasoning we encounter includes beliefs about the way the world was, is, or is going to be that the communicator wants us to accept as “facts.” These beliefs can be conclusions, reasons, or assumptions. We can refer to such beliefs as factual claims. The first question you should ask about a factual claim is, “Why should I believe it?” Your next question is, “Does the claim need evidence to support it?” If it does, and if there is no evidence, the claim is a mere assertion, meaning a claim that is not backed up in any way. You should seriously question the dependability of mere assertions! If there is evidence, your next question is, “How good is the evidence?” To evaluate reasoning, we need to remember that some factual claims can be counted on more than others. For example, you probably feel quite certain that the claim “most U.S. senators are men” is true, but less certain that the assertion “practicing yoga reduces the risk of cancer” is true. Because it is extremely difficult, if not impossible, to establish the absolute truth or falsity of most claims, rather than asking whether they are true, we prefer to ask whether they are dependable. In essence, we want to ask, “Can we count on such beliefs?” The greater the quality and quantity of evidence supporting a claim, the more we can depend on it, and the more we can call the claim a “fact.” For example, abundant evidence exists that George Washington was the first president of the United States of America. Thus, we can treat that claim as a fact. On the other hand, there is much conflicting evidence for the belief “bottled water is safer to drink than tap water.” We thus can’t treat this belief as a fact. The major difference between claims that are opinions and those that are facts is the present state of the relevant evidence. The more supporting evidence there is for a belief, the more “factual” the belief becomes. Before we judge the persuasiveness of a communication, we need to know which factual claims are most dependable. How do we determine dependability? We ask questions like the following: What is your proof? How do you know that’s true? Where’s the evidence? Why do you believe that? Are you sure that’s true? Can you prove it? You will be well on your way to being among the best critical thinkers when you develop the habit of regularly asking these questions. They require those making arguments to be responsible by revealing the basis for their arguments. Anyone with an argument that you should consider will not hesitate to answer these questions. They know they have substantial support for their claims and, consequently, will want to share their evidence in the hope that you will learn to share their conclusions. When people react to simple requests for evidence with anger or withdrawal, they usually do so because they are embarrassed as they realize that, without evidence, they should have been less assertive about their beliefs. When we regula.
Evidence!!
The document discusses the importance of evidence in supporting arguments and speeches. It defines evidence as specific instances, testimony, and proof that help establish credibility and sway an audience. There are three main types of evidence: statistical evidence which communicates facts without citing each instance; testimony evidence from professionals supporting a claim; and legal precedent evidence from past court rulings that may aid a similar case. For evidence to be strong, it cannot be falsified, must come from reliable sources, and should answer all audience questions without leaving doubts.
Similar to Weighing Evidence.pdf (20)
Https _ecf.okwd.uscourts.gov_cgi-bin_show_temp.pl_file=1708178-0--893
Https _ecf.okwd.uscourts.gov_cgi-bin_show_temp.pl_file=1708178-0--893
CHARLES DYER'S NOT GUILTY VERDICT FOR THE FEDERAL WEAPONS CHARGE!
CHARLES DYER'S NOT GUILTY VERDICT FOR THE FEDERAL WEAPONS CHARGE!
Chapter 21 - The Investigator and the Legal System1.docx
Chapter 21 - The Investigator and the Legal System1.docx
Explain the relevance of the rules against hearsay to digital eviden.pdf
Explain the relevance of the rules against hearsay to digital eviden.pdf
THE NEED FOR EVIDENCE Almost all reasoning we encounter includes bel.docx
THE NEED FOR EVIDENCE Almost all reasoning we encounter includes bel.docx
Recently uploaded
Integrating Advocacy and Legal Tactics to Tackle Online Consumer Complaints
Our company bridges the gap between registered users and experienced advocates, offering a user-friendly online platform for seamless interaction. This platform empowers users to voice their grievances, particularly regarding online consumer issues. We streamline support by utilizing our team of expert advocates to provide consultancy services and initiate appropriate legal actions.
Our Online Consumer Legal Forum offers comprehensive guidance to individuals and businesses facing consumer complaints. With a dedicated team, round-the-clock support, and efficient complaint management, we are the preferred solution for addressing consumer grievances.
Our intuitive online interface allows individuals to register complaints, seek legal advice, and pursue justice conveniently. Users can submit complaints via mobile devices and send legal notices to companies directly through our portal.
一比一原版多伦多都会大学毕业证(TMU毕业证书)学历如何办理
原版办【微信号:95270640】【多伦多都会大学毕业证(TMU毕业证书)】【微信号:95270640】《成绩单、外壳、雅思、offer、真实留信官方学历认证（永久存档/真实可查）》采用学校原版纸张、特殊工艺完全按照原版一比一制作（包括：隐形水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠，文字图案浮雕，激光镭射，紫外荧光，温感，复印防伪）行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备，十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，业务范围有加拿大、英国、澳洲、韩国、美国、新加坡，新西兰等学历材料，包您满意。
【我们承诺采用的是学校原版纸张（纸质、底色、纹路）我们拥有全套进口原装设备，特殊工艺都是采用不同机器制作，仿真度基本可以达到100%，所有工艺效果都可提前给客户展示，不满意可以根据客户要求进行调整，直到满意为止！】
【业务选择办理准则】
一、工作未确定，回国需先给父母、亲戚朋友看下文凭的情况，办理一份就读学校的毕业证【微信号95270640】文凭即可
二、回国进私企、外企、自己做生意的情况，这些单位是不查询毕业证真伪的，而且国内没有渠道去查询国外文凭的真假，也不需要提供真实教育部认证。鉴于此，办理一份毕业证【微信号95270640】即可
三、进国企，银行，事业单位，考公务员等等，这些单位是必需要提供真实教育部认证的，办理教育部认证所需资料众多且烦琐，所有材料您都必须提供原件，我们凭借丰富的经验，快捷的绿色通道帮您快速整合材料，让您少走弯路。
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
留信网服务项目：
1、留学生专业人才库服务（留信分析）
2、国（境）学习人员提供就业推荐信服务
3、留学人员区块链存储服务
【关于价格问题（保证一手价格）】
我们所定的价格是非常合理的，而且我们现在做得单子大多数都是代理和回头客户介绍的所以一般现在有新的单子 我给客户的都是第一手的代理价格，因为我想坦诚对待大家 不想跟大家在价格方面浪费时间
对于老客户或者被老客户介绍过来的朋友，我们都会适当给一些优惠。
选择实体注册公司办理，更放心，更安全！我们的承诺：客户在留信官方认证查询网站查询到认证通过结果后付款，不成功不收费！
Pedal to the Court Understanding Your Rights after a Cycling Collision.pdf
The immediate step is an intelligent choice; don’t procrastinate. In the aftermath of the crash, taking care of yourself and taking quick steps can help you protect yourself from significant injuries. Make sure that you have collected the essential data and information.
一比一原版(liverpool毕业证书)利物浦大学毕业证如何办理
原版一模一样【微信：741003700 】【(liverpool毕业证书)利物浦大学毕业证成绩单】【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
【主营项目】
一.毕业证【q微741003700】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微741003700】
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
办理(liverpool毕业证书)利物浦大学毕业证【微信：741003700 】外观非常简单，由纸质材料制成，上面印有校徽、校名、毕业生姓名、专业等信息。
办理(liverpool毕业证书)利物浦大学毕业证【微信：741003700 】格式相对统一，各专业都有相应的模板。通常包括以下部分：
校徽：象征着学校的荣誉和传承。
校名:学校英文全称
授予学位：本部分将注明获得的具体学位名称。
毕业生姓名：这是最重要的信息之一，标志着该证书是由特定人员获得的。
颁发日期：这是毕业正式生效的时间，也代表着毕业生学业的结束。
其他信息：根据不同的专业和学位，可能会有一些特定的信息或章节。
办理(liverpool毕业证书)利物浦大学毕业证【微信：741003700 】价值很高，需要妥善保管。一般来说，应放置在安全、干燥、防潮的地方，避免长时间暴露在阳光下。如需使用，最好使用复印件而不是原件，以免丢失。
综上所述，办理(liverpool毕业证书)利物浦大学毕业证【微信：741003700 】是证明身份和学历的高价值文件。外观简单庄重，格式统一，包括重要的个人信息和发布日期。对持有人来说，妥善保管是非常重要的。
一比一原版(uottawa毕业证书)加拿大渥太华大学毕业证如何办理
原版一模一样【微信：741003700 】【(uottawa毕业证书)加拿大渥太华大学毕业证成绩单】【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
【主营项目】
一.毕业证【q微741003700】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微741003700】
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
办理(uottawa毕业证书)加拿大渥太华大学毕业证【微信：741003700 】外观非常简单，由纸质材料制成，上面印有校徽、校名、毕业生姓名、专业等信息。
办理(uottawa毕业证书)加拿大渥太华大学毕业证【微信：741003700 】格式相对统一，各专业都有相应的模板。通常包括以下部分：
校徽：象征着学校的荣誉和传承。
校名:学校英文全称
授予学位：本部分将注明获得的具体学位名称。
毕业生姓名：这是最重要的信息之一，标志着该证书是由特定人员获得的。
颁发日期：这是毕业正式生效的时间，也代表着毕业生学业的结束。
其他信息：根据不同的专业和学位，可能会有一些特定的信息或章节。
办理(uottawa毕业证书)加拿大渥太华大学毕业证【微信：741003700 】价值很高，需要妥善保管。一般来说，应放置在安全、干燥、防潮的地方，避免长时间暴露在阳光下。如需使用，最好使用复印件而不是原件，以免丢失。
综上所述，办理(uottawa毕业证书)加拿大渥太华大学毕业证【微信：741003700 】是证明身份和学历的高价值文件。外观简单庄重，格式统一，包括重要的个人信息和发布日期。对持有人来说，妥善保管是非常重要的。
一比一原版(trent毕业证书)加拿大特伦特大学毕业证如何办理
原版一模一样【微信：741003700 】【(trent毕业证书)加拿大特伦特大学毕业证成绩单】【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
【主营项目】
一.毕业证【q微741003700】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微741003700】
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
办理(trent毕业证书)加拿大特伦特大学毕业证【微信：741003700 】外观非常简单，由纸质材料制成，上面印有校徽、校名、毕业生姓名、专业等信息。
办理(trent毕业证书)加拿大特伦特大学毕业证【微信：741003700 】格式相对统一，各专业都有相应的模板。通常包括以下部分：
校徽：象征着学校的荣誉和传承。
校名:学校英文全称
授予学位：本部分将注明获得的具体学位名称。
毕业生姓名：这是最重要的信息之一，标志着该证书是由特定人员获得的。
颁发日期：这是毕业正式生效的时间，也代表着毕业生学业的结束。
其他信息：根据不同的专业和学位，可能会有一些特定的信息或章节。
办理(trent毕业证书)加拿大特伦特大学毕业证【微信：741003700 】价值很高，需要妥善保管。一般来说，应放置在安全、干燥、防潮的地方，避免长时间暴露在阳光下。如需使用，最好使用复印件而不是原件，以免丢失。
综上所述，办理(trent毕业证书)加拿大特伦特大学毕业证【微信：741003700 】是证明身份和学历的高价值文件。外观简单庄重，格式统一，包括重要的个人信息和发布日期。对持有人来说，妥善保管是非常重要的。
Capital Punishment by Saif Javed (LLM)ppt.pptx
This PowerPoint presentation, titled "Capital Punishment in India: Constitutionality and Rarest of Rare Principle," is a comprehensive exploration of the death penalty within the Indian criminal justice system. Authored by Saif Javed, an LL.M student specializing in Criminal Law and Criminology at Kazi Nazrul University, the presentation delves into the constitutional aspects and ethical debates surrounding capital punishment. It examines key legal provisions, significant case laws, and the specific categories of offenders excluded from the death penalty. The presentation also discusses recent recommendations by the Law Commission of India regarding the gradual abolishment of capital punishment, except for terrorism-related offenses. This detailed analysis aims to foster informed discussions on the future of the death penalty in India.
From Promise to Practice. Implementing AI in Legal Environments
Pim Betist's presentation about generative AI in the legal sector at Lexpo.com '24
一比一原版(uwgb毕业证书)美国威斯康星大学绿湾分校毕业证如何办理
原版一模一样【微信：741003700 】【(uwgb毕业证书)美国威斯康星大学绿湾分校毕业证成绩单】【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
【主营项目】
一.毕业证【q微741003700】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微741003700】
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
办理(uwgb毕业证书)美国威斯康星大学绿湾分校毕业证【微信：741003700 】外观非常简单，由纸质材料制成，上面印有校徽、校名、毕业生姓名、专业等信息。
办理(uwgb毕业证书)美国威斯康星大学绿湾分校毕业证【微信：741003700 】格式相对统一，各专业都有相应的模板。通常包括以下部分：
校徽：象征着学校的荣誉和传承。
校名:学校英文全称
授予学位：本部分将注明获得的具体学位名称。
毕业生姓名：这是最重要的信息之一，标志着该证书是由特定人员获得的。
颁发日期：这是毕业正式生效的时间，也代表着毕业生学业的结束。
其他信息：根据不同的专业和学位，可能会有一些特定的信息或章节。
办理(uwgb毕业证书)美国威斯康星大学绿湾分校毕业证【微信：741003700 】价值很高，需要妥善保管。一般来说，应放置在安全、干燥、防潮的地方，避免长时间暴露在阳光下。如需使用，最好使用复印件而不是原件，以免丢失。
综上所述，办理(uwgb毕业证书)美国威斯康星大学绿湾分校毕业证【微信：741003700 】是证明身份和学历的高价值文件。外观简单庄重，格式统一，包括重要的个人信息和发布日期。对持有人来说，妥善保管是非常重要的。
Business Laws Sunita saha
Business law for the students of undergraduate level. The presentation contains the summary of all the chapters under the syllabus of State University, Contract Act, Sale of Goods Act, Negotiable Instrument Act, Partnership Act, Limited Liability Act, Consumer Protection Act.
一比一原版(uwlc毕业证书)美国威斯康星大学拉克罗斯分校毕业证如何办理
原版一模一样【微信：741003700 】【(uwlc毕业证书)美国威斯康星大学拉克罗斯分校毕业证成绩单】【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
【主营项目】
一.毕业证【q微741003700】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微741003700】
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
办理(uwlc毕业证书)美国威斯康星大学拉克罗斯分校毕业证【微信：741003700 】外观非常简单，由纸质材料制成，上面印有校徽、校名、毕业生姓名、专业等信息。
办理(uwlc毕业证书)美国威斯康星大学拉克罗斯分校毕业证【微信：741003700 】格式相对统一，各专业都有相应的模板。通常包括以下部分：
校徽：象征着学校的荣誉和传承。
校名:学校英文全称
授予学位：本部分将注明获得的具体学位名称。
毕业生姓名：这是最重要的信息之一，标志着该证书是由特定人员获得的。
颁发日期：这是毕业正式生效的时间，也代表着毕业生学业的结束。
其他信息：根据不同的专业和学位，可能会有一些特定的信息或章节。
办理(uwlc毕业证书)美国威斯康星大学拉克罗斯分校毕业证【微信：741003700 】价值很高，需要妥善保管。一般来说，应放置在安全、干燥、防潮的地方，避免长时间暴露在阳光下。如需使用，最好使用复印件而不是原件，以免丢失。
综上所述，办理(uwlc毕业证书)美国威斯康星大学拉克罗斯分校毕业证【微信：741003700 】是证明身份和学历的高价值文件。外观简单庄重，格式统一，包括重要的个人信息和发布日期。对持有人来说，妥善保管是非常重要的。
一比一原版加拿大达尔豪斯大学毕业证（dalhousie毕业证书）如何办理
原版一模一样【微信：741003700 】【加拿大达尔豪斯大学毕业证（dalhousie毕业证书）成绩单】【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
【主营项目】
一.毕业证【q微741003700】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微741003700】
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
办理加拿大达尔豪斯大学毕业证（dalhousie毕业证书）【微信：741003700 】外观非常简单，由纸质材料制成，上面印有校徽、校名、毕业生姓名、专业等信息。
办理加拿大达尔豪斯大学毕业证（dalhousie毕业证书）【微信：741003700 】格式相对统一，各专业都有相应的模板。通常包括以下部分：
校徽：象征着学校的荣誉和传承。
校名:学校英文全称
授予学位：本部分将注明获得的具体学位名称。
毕业生姓名：这是最重要的信息之一，标志着该证书是由特定人员获得的。
颁发日期：这是毕业正式生效的时间，也代表着毕业生学业的结束。
其他信息：根据不同的专业和学位，可能会有一些特定的信息或章节。
办理加拿大达尔豪斯大学毕业证（dalhousie毕业证书）【微信：741003700 】价值很高，需要妥善保管。一般来说，应放置在安全、干燥、防潮的地方，避免长时间暴露在阳光下。如需使用，最好使用复印件而不是原件，以免丢失。
综上所述，办理加拿大达尔豪斯大学毕业证（dalhousie毕业证书）【微信：741003700 】是证明身份和学历的高价值文件。外观简单庄重，格式统一，包括重要的个人信息和发布日期。对持有人来说，妥善保管是非常重要的。
THE CONCEPT OF RIGHT TO DEFAULT BAIL.pptx
The presentation deals with the concept of Right to Default Bail laid down under Section 167 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 and Section 187 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023.
快速办理(SCU毕业证书)澳洲南十字星大学毕业证文凭证书一模一样
学校原件一模一样【微信：741003700 】《(SCU毕业证书)澳洲南十字星大学毕业证文凭证书》【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
【主营项目】
一.毕业证【q微741003700】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微741003700】
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
一比一原版牛津布鲁克斯大学毕业证（牛布毕业证）如何办理
原版一模一样【微信：741003700 】【牛津布鲁克斯大学毕业证（牛布毕业证）成绩单】【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
【主营项目】
一.毕业证【q微741003700】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微741003700】
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
办理牛津布鲁克斯大学毕业证（牛布毕业证）【微信：741003700 】外观非常简单，由纸质材料制成，上面印有校徽、校名、毕业生姓名、专业等信息。
办理牛津布鲁克斯大学毕业证（牛布毕业证）【微信：741003700 】格式相对统一，各专业都有相应的模板。通常包括以下部分：
校徽：象征着学校的荣誉和传承。
校名:学校英文全称
授予学位：本部分将注明获得的具体学位名称。
毕业生姓名：这是最重要的信息之一，标志着该证书是由特定人员获得的。
颁发日期：这是毕业正式生效的时间，也代表着毕业生学业的结束。
其他信息：根据不同的专业和学位，可能会有一些特定的信息或章节。
办理牛津布鲁克斯大学毕业证（牛布毕业证）【微信：741003700 】价值很高，需要妥善保管。一般来说，应放置在安全、干燥、防潮的地方，避免长时间暴露在阳光下。如需使用，最好使用复印件而不是原件，以免丢失。
综上所述，办理牛津布鲁克斯大学毕业证（牛布毕业证）【微信：741003700 】是证明身份和学历的高价值文件。外观简单庄重，格式统一，包括重要的个人信息和发布日期。对持有人来说，妥善保管是非常重要的。
一比一原版伯恩茅斯大学毕业证（bu毕业证）如何办理
原版一模一样【微信：741003700 】【伯恩茅斯大学毕业证（bu毕业证）成绩单】【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
【主营项目】
一.毕业证【q微741003700】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微741003700】
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
办理伯恩茅斯大学毕业证（bu毕业证）【微信：741003700 】外观非常简单，由纸质材料制成，上面印有校徽、校名、毕业生姓名、专业等信息。
办理伯恩茅斯大学毕业证（bu毕业证）【微信：741003700 】格式相对统一，各专业都有相应的模板。通常包括以下部分：
校徽：象征着学校的荣誉和传承。
校名:学校英文全称
授予学位：本部分将注明获得的具体学位名称。
毕业生姓名：这是最重要的信息之一，标志着该证书是由特定人员获得的。
颁发日期：这是毕业正式生效的时间，也代表着毕业生学业的结束。
其他信息：根据不同的专业和学位，可能会有一些特定的信息或章节。
办理伯恩茅斯大学毕业证（bu毕业证）【微信：741003700 】价值很高，需要妥善保管。一般来说，应放置在安全、干燥、防潮的地方，避免长时间暴露在阳光下。如需使用，最好使用复印件而不是原件，以免丢失。
综上所述，办理伯恩茅斯大学毕业证（bu毕业证）【微信：741003700 】是证明身份和学历的高价值文件。外观简单庄重，格式统一，包括重要的个人信息和发布日期。对持有人来说，妥善保管是非常重要的。
San Remo Manual on International Law Applicable to Armed Conflict at Sea
Presentation by Justin Ordoyo
University of the Philippines College of Law
Recently uploaded (20)
Integrating Advocacy and Legal Tactics to Tackle Online Consumer Complaints
Integrating Advocacy and Legal Tactics to Tackle Online Consumer Complaints
Pedal to the Court Understanding Your Rights after a Cycling Collision.pdf
Pedal to the Court Understanding Your Rights after a Cycling Collision.pdf
From Promise to Practice. Implementing AI in Legal Environments
From Promise to Practice. Implementing AI in Legal Environments
San Remo Manual on International Law Applicable to Armed Conflict at Sea
San Remo Manual on International Law Applicable to Armed Conflict at Sea
Weighing Evidence.pdf
- 2. DEFINITION Weighing evidence is the process of assessing the reliability and the probative value of evidence already determined to be relevant.
- 3. EVIDENCE Evidence determines which facts are proved or disproved. Not all evidence equally helps in making findings, therefore evidence must be weighed. More trustworthy and probative evidence given more weight in coming to a decision on the matters in issue. To determine weight involves the application of common sense.
- 4. WEIGHING EVIDENCE Evidence should be weighed in light of all of the evidence in the case and the issues to be decided, i.e. in its totality. Evidence may be given full weight, partial weight, more or less weight than other evidence, or no weight at all. Evidence is weighed against other evidence to determine which evidence is more reliable. Ultimately, the weight will determine if the burden of proof is met for each element of the offence.
- 5. STEPS IN WEIGHING EVIDENCE Identify the determinative issues. Sort the evidence by its relevance to those issues. Weigh the evidence for its probative value and reliability. Give reasons for ascribing more or less weight to particular evidence. Make clear findings of fact. Apply the appropriate legal tests to the evidence found to be probative and reliable. NB: Some factors considered in weighing reliability of evidence, will also be used to determine the credibility of the evidence.
- 6. 1 FACTORS TO CONSIDER IN WEIGHING EVIDENCE Credibility - determined by demeanour (conduct, appearance, etc.) Circumstantial evidence - indirect proof which has no direct link with the facts in dispute but the cumulative effect of such evidence may serve as proof and will determine the weight. Not the only reasonable inference, but the most probable inference to be made.
- 7. 2 FACTORS TO CONSIDER IN WEIGHING EVIDENCE Failure to cross-examine witness – a party does not dispute the version of the witness. Failure of a party to testify - Presiding Officers will have only the unchallenged “prima facie” evidence of the other party. Failure to call available witnesses - reasons why witnesses are not called should be examined, e.g. are they hostile, biased or unreliable.
- 8. ADDITIONAL FACTORS IN WEIGHING EVIDENCE The person making the statement and the circumstances in making of statements. Number of times the info is passed on before being made known to the witness. Consistency of the statement in terms other reliable evidence. Witness' opportunity to observe the events on which he testifies. Circumstances surrounding the event. Is better evidence available and why it is not produced?
- 9. ADDITIONAL FACTORS IN WEIGHING EVIDENCE Is the witness drawing reasonable inferences or is simply speculating? Is the evidence consistent with reliable documentary or other evidence? Circumstances under which a document was created. Opportunity to cross-examine the author of a document Is the witness is disinterested in the result or biased? Witness' qualifications and knowledge of the subject on which he testifies. Knowledge and expertise of author of a document.