Ambulatory Monitoring of Patients
gadgets’ h_pe : hype or hope?
Assoc. Prof. Katarzyna Wac
University of Geneva & University of Copenhagen
{katarzyna.wac@unige.ch, wac@di.ku.dk}
http://www.qol.unige.ch
5th February 2015, SOFAMEA
36 years old
female
161 cm, BMI = 23.3
BP: 117/76 mmHg
glucose (fasting): 5.8 mmol/l
RHR: 60 BPM, Sp02=97%
fatigue: 0-1/10
pain: 0/10
no bone fractures
no medications
blood A+, blood donor since 2004
Lifestyle
single, no children
sedentary office worker (since 2003)
light activity (walking ~1h/day, ~2-3/week 30min endurance session)
was vegetarian (age 13-25), red meat: ~1/month
non-smoker
social drinker of alcohol (~1/month)
Meet your patient…
?
%error
A typical night
A typical day (+ a gym session)
Moves
FREE
FitBit
99CHF
BASIS
169CHF
Speed of walking 1.6m/s
Meeting, email, Skype
Office applications
Reading, literature search
standing desk use, fatigue 1-2, pain 0
LifeSlice
FREE
RescueTime
FREE
Next
• Body posture
• Respiration rate
• Continuous glucose monitoring
• Diet, eating patterns
• Medications compliance
• Even further: blood, hormones
– cortisol, oxytocin, serotonin, dopamine
Lumback
249$
SPIRE
79$
FreeStyle
170€
HappiFork
99$
GlowCaps
99$
Talking20
99$
Gut Sample
AmericanGut
99$
The Challenge
?
[G. Wolf and K. Kelly, Wired, 2007; Wac, IMIA 2012; Wac, SAA 2013; Wac, AAAI, 2014]
%error
Causes of Premature Deaths: Behavioral
• Cost of ‘behavioural’ diseases: 47 trillion USD for the next 20 years
(US)
[McGinnis JM, Williams-Russo P, Knickman JR. The case for more active policy attention to health promotion. Health Aff 2002;21:78-93]
[Mokdad AH, Marks JS, Stroup JS, Gerberding JL. Actual causes of death in the United States, 2000. JAMA 2004;291:1238-1245]
23andMe
99$
ambulatory monitoring / mhealth / telemedicine
mhealth
Service Provider
Mobile Network
Operator
Care Professional (specialist)
Patient(s)
Care Professional
Internet
[e.g., Wac et al., IEEE EMBC, 2009]
Telemedicine/mhealth Example (2003)
Telemedicine/mhealth Example (2020+)
m-health
Service Provider
Mobile Network
Operator
Care Professional (specialist)
Patient(s)
Care Professional
Internet
[Strickland, IEEE Spectrum, 2012]
hype
Strengths & Weaknesses
• Design Principles
– Miniaturized, (always) connected
~ Personalized
~ Easier to use, relatively cheap
~ Battery-efficient
– Gamification to increase “compliance” (  smartphone)
– Towards: actionable feedback addressing psychological biases
• e.g., myopia (“short-term vs. long-term” state)
• overconfidence (“not me”)
BUT (“colonization phase”)
– Unreliable (‘what is a step?’) vs. ground truth
– Not clinically validated
• Diagnosis, rehabilitation, treatment support?
[G. Wolf and K. Kelly, Wired, 2007; Wac, IMIA 2012; Wac, SAA 2013; Wac, AAAI 2014]
Success Factors
[Broens et al., Determinants for Successful Telemedicine Implementations (literature review), 2007]
Attitude
Usability
Evidence-based solutions
hope
self-management & support for caregivers
Example Projects (I)
AAL TraiNutri
- Smartphone Acc
- Physical activity levels
& patterns
- IC: Gold standard
EyeWalker
- Cameras, Acc sensor
- Mobility patterns
AAL MyGuardian
- Mild cognitive impairments
- Smartphone GPS
- Mobility patterns & security
zones
[www.qol.unige.ch/apps/ALE.html; cvml.unige.ch/doku.php/mmi/eyewalker; myguardian-project.eu]
Example Projects (II)
FP7 ICT Giraffplus
- Activities of Daily Living
- In home-based
measurements
FP7 ICT
iStoppFalls
- Kinect and Acc
- Measure movements
- ‘Exergame’
FP7 ICT CuPiD
- Parkinson’s ‘freeze of
gait’
- Smartphone + Inertial
Measurement Units
- Measure + give an
auditory feedback
[http://www.giraffplus.eu; http://www.istoppfalls.eu; http://www.cupid-project.eu]
Conclusive Remarks
• Challenges Ahead
– Human factors &
User acceptance
– Privacy, security, trust
– Evaluation method vs. RCT
• e.g., Sequential, Multiple
Assignment, Randomized Trials
(SMART)
– Organizational issues
– Interoperability,
standardization
– Legal, liability (e.g., FDA, EC)
– Financial aspects,
reimbursements
• Recommendations
– mHealth technologically
feasible for non-critical
cases
– Inter/trans-disciplinary
approach needed
• Translational
• User-centered design
– Bridge the gap via an open,
trustworthy dialogue
– Encode implicit
expectations &
requirements
– Innovation: “who’s turn is
now”?
• Innovating the intervention[Wac, IMIA 2012; Wac, SAA 2013; Wac, AAAI 2014]
Quality of Life by
[WHOQOL group, 1995]
?
Q&A
ambulatory monitoring of patients
http://www.qol.unige.ch

Ambulatory Monitoring of Patients (mhealth’ h_pe : hype or hope?)

  • 1.
    Ambulatory Monitoring ofPatients gadgets’ h_pe : hype or hope? Assoc. Prof. Katarzyna Wac University of Geneva & University of Copenhagen {katarzyna.wac@unige.ch, wac@di.ku.dk} http://www.qol.unige.ch 5th February 2015, SOFAMEA
  • 2.
    36 years old female 161cm, BMI = 23.3 BP: 117/76 mmHg glucose (fasting): 5.8 mmol/l RHR: 60 BPM, Sp02=97% fatigue: 0-1/10 pain: 0/10 no bone fractures no medications blood A+, blood donor since 2004 Lifestyle single, no children sedentary office worker (since 2003) light activity (walking ~1h/day, ~2-3/week 30min endurance session) was vegetarian (age 13-25), red meat: ~1/month non-smoker social drinker of alcohol (~1/month) Meet your patient… ? %error
  • 3.
  • 4.
    A typical day(+ a gym session) Moves FREE FitBit 99CHF BASIS 169CHF Speed of walking 1.6m/s
  • 5.
    Meeting, email, Skype Officeapplications Reading, literature search standing desk use, fatigue 1-2, pain 0 LifeSlice FREE RescueTime FREE
  • 6.
    Next • Body posture •Respiration rate • Continuous glucose monitoring • Diet, eating patterns • Medications compliance • Even further: blood, hormones – cortisol, oxytocin, serotonin, dopamine Lumback 249$ SPIRE 79$ FreeStyle 170€ HappiFork 99$ GlowCaps 99$ Talking20 99$
  • 7.
  • 8.
    The Challenge ? [G. Wolfand K. Kelly, Wired, 2007; Wac, IMIA 2012; Wac, SAA 2013; Wac, AAAI, 2014] %error
  • 9.
    Causes of PrematureDeaths: Behavioral • Cost of ‘behavioural’ diseases: 47 trillion USD for the next 20 years (US) [McGinnis JM, Williams-Russo P, Knickman JR. The case for more active policy attention to health promotion. Health Aff 2002;21:78-93] [Mokdad AH, Marks JS, Stroup JS, Gerberding JL. Actual causes of death in the United States, 2000. JAMA 2004;291:1238-1245] 23andMe 99$
  • 10.
    ambulatory monitoring /mhealth / telemedicine
  • 11.
    mhealth Service Provider Mobile Network Operator CareProfessional (specialist) Patient(s) Care Professional Internet [e.g., Wac et al., IEEE EMBC, 2009] Telemedicine/mhealth Example (2003)
  • 12.
    Telemedicine/mhealth Example (2020+) m-health ServiceProvider Mobile Network Operator Care Professional (specialist) Patient(s) Care Professional Internet [Strickland, IEEE Spectrum, 2012]
  • 13.
  • 14.
    Strengths & Weaknesses •Design Principles – Miniaturized, (always) connected ~ Personalized ~ Easier to use, relatively cheap ~ Battery-efficient – Gamification to increase “compliance” (  smartphone) – Towards: actionable feedback addressing psychological biases • e.g., myopia (“short-term vs. long-term” state) • overconfidence (“not me”) BUT (“colonization phase”) – Unreliable (‘what is a step?’) vs. ground truth – Not clinically validated • Diagnosis, rehabilitation, treatment support? [G. Wolf and K. Kelly, Wired, 2007; Wac, IMIA 2012; Wac, SAA 2013; Wac, AAAI 2014]
  • 15.
    Success Factors [Broens etal., Determinants for Successful Telemedicine Implementations (literature review), 2007] Attitude Usability Evidence-based solutions
  • 16.
  • 17.
    Example Projects (I) AALTraiNutri - Smartphone Acc - Physical activity levels & patterns - IC: Gold standard EyeWalker - Cameras, Acc sensor - Mobility patterns AAL MyGuardian - Mild cognitive impairments - Smartphone GPS - Mobility patterns & security zones [www.qol.unige.ch/apps/ALE.html; cvml.unige.ch/doku.php/mmi/eyewalker; myguardian-project.eu]
  • 18.
    Example Projects (II) FP7ICT Giraffplus - Activities of Daily Living - In home-based measurements FP7 ICT iStoppFalls - Kinect and Acc - Measure movements - ‘Exergame’ FP7 ICT CuPiD - Parkinson’s ‘freeze of gait’ - Smartphone + Inertial Measurement Units - Measure + give an auditory feedback [http://www.giraffplus.eu; http://www.istoppfalls.eu; http://www.cupid-project.eu]
  • 19.
    Conclusive Remarks • ChallengesAhead – Human factors & User acceptance – Privacy, security, trust – Evaluation method vs. RCT • e.g., Sequential, Multiple Assignment, Randomized Trials (SMART) – Organizational issues – Interoperability, standardization – Legal, liability (e.g., FDA, EC) – Financial aspects, reimbursements • Recommendations – mHealth technologically feasible for non-critical cases – Inter/trans-disciplinary approach needed • Translational • User-centered design – Bridge the gap via an open, trustworthy dialogue – Encode implicit expectations & requirements – Innovation: “who’s turn is now”? • Innovating the intervention[Wac, IMIA 2012; Wac, SAA 2013; Wac, AAAI 2014]
  • 20.
    Quality of Lifeby [WHOQOL group, 1995] ?
  • 21.
    Q&A ambulatory monitoring ofpatients http://www.qol.unige.ch