SlideShare a Scribd company logo
WOODLAND UNITED
                    V O L U M E   1 0   I S S U E   1                O C T O B E R   2 0 1 1




                 LPDC Becomes PDCC
INSIDE           The Local Professional Development Committee has become the
T HI S           Professional Development Certification Committee. The change in the
I S S UE :       committee’s name reflects a slight change in the recertification
                 process. Instead of having to submit your Statement of Assurance to
                 the former LPDC and having them approve it before being sent onto
                 the Regional Office of Education (ROE) for their approval, now you
LPDC         1   will submit your Statement of Assurance directly to the ROE for their
Becomes          approval. The Statement of Assurance, for your reference, is the final
PDCC             electronic document one submits after he/she has entered all of the
                 appropriate CPDUs or coursework into ISBE’s online Educator
Senate       2   Certification System. Since the ROE can handle this function, the
Bill 7           need for the LPDC was not as strong. But the need for the staff to get
                 assistance with the recertification process is still present, which is why
                 the PDCC was put in place. This committee, which includes one
PERA         3
                 member from each building, allows the staff to continue to have a
                 colleague in their building in addition to the Human Resource
Health    4      Department to help them with the recertification process. Each of the
Insurance        members on the PDCC previously served on the LPDC, so they are
Committee
                 very knowledgeable and will be a great resource for any staff member
                 who certification needs to be renewed in the future. The committee
                 members along with their respective building are Katie Jones –
                 Primary, Linda Ufheil – Elementary West, Kerry Winston –
                 Elementary East, Jeri Steele – Intermediate, and Jackie Beegun –
                 Middle School.
PAGE 2


                Legislative Update - Senate Bill 7
                This bill, effective this year, establishes new Reduction in Force
                (RIF) and recall procedures. The bill will also change the
                terminology used, as the reduction in force will be referred to as
                layoffs or honorable dismissals. The terms will be able to be
                used interchangeably and can include the honorable dismissal of
                tenured or non-tenured teachers.            The first step is the
                categorization of teachers. The school district must categorize
                each teacher into one or more positions for which the teacher is
                legally qualified to hold and any other qualifications established
                by the district in a job description that may exist. This list must
“committee
                be completed no later than May 10 of any school year prior to a
must be         school year during which a layoff might occur. A joint
established     committee composed of equal numbers of representatives
and meet        selected by the school board and the Union must be established.
                The committee must be established and meet for the first time on
for the first   or before December 1, 2011 in the initial year of the law. In the
time on or      initial year of the law, as well as the subsequent years, this joint
before          committee’s work is required to be completed by February 1 in
                order for the agreement of the joint committee to apply to the
December 1,
                sequence of dismissal determined during that school year.
2011”           Subject to the February 1 deadline for agreements, any
                agreement made by the joint committee remain in effect until
                amended or terminated by the joint committee. Also, within
                each position and subject to the agreements made by the joint
                committee on layoffs by February 1 of each school year, the
                school district must establish four grouping of teachers qualified
                to hold positions. In the end, the district must, in consultation
                with the Union, provide an honorable dismissal list categorized
                by positions and four groupings. Copies of this list must be
                distributed to the Union at least 75 days before the end of the
                school year. The groups will be partially determined by a
                teacher’s performance evaluation. An edition of Woodland
                United focusing on the new laws will include information on the
                four groups and the procedure for honorable dismissals will be
                published in the next month.




WOODLAND UNITED
PAGE   3


                    Performance Evaluation Reform Act - PERA
                    This legislation put     evaluators by           recommendations
                    into place a new         September 1, 2012.      for the Illinois State
                    teacher evaluation       The training shall be   Board of Education
                    system that              provided or             (ISBE) on rules,
                    incorporates             approved by ISBE.       default models, and
                    measures of student      PERA also requires      state supports for the
“incorporates       growth along with        the establishment of    new evaluation
measures of         the traditional          a Union/                system. The council
student             professional             administration          includes three
                    practice. The most       committee to            subcommittees that
growth”             immediate                negotiate the use of    meet between the
                    application of the       data as part of the     monthly PEAC
                    new legislation is       incorporation of        meetings. The
                    the requirement of 4     student growth          subcommittees are
                    rating categories by     measures. One           for the teacher
                    September 1, 2012.       important part of       evaluation design,
                    The four rating          PERA that must be       principal evaluation
                    categories will be       kept in mind is that    design, and
                    excellent, proficient,   the inclusion of        evaluator training,
                    needs improvement,       student growth in a     prequalification and
                    and unsatisfactory.      teacher’s evaluation    support. More
                    The district and         won’t be                information
                    Union will be            implemented until       regarding PEAC and
                    working to               September 1, 2016.      it’s
                    incorporate these        Between now and         recommendations to
                    new rating               then many of the        ISBE can be found
                    categories into our      preliminary ideas       at http://
                    current rating           regarding this          www.isbe.net/peac/.
                    categories               important new           More information on
                    (excellent,              aspect of a teacher’s   the new rating
                    satisfactory, and        evaluation will         categories will be
                    unsatisfactory).         finalized. The          included in the same
                    Another important        Performance             edition of Woodland
                    component of PERA        Evaluation Advisory     United that focuses
                    is the required          Council (PEAC) has      on the groups for
                    evaluator training       been meeting since      honorable dismissals
                    and pre-                 May of 2010 to          outlined in Senate
                    qualifications for all   create                  Bill 7.


         WOODLAND    UNITED
VOLUME    10   ISSUE   1                                                  PAGE   4




Health Insurance Committee
The joint committee comprised of Union and Administration
representatives has been established and held their first monthly meeting
on September 27th. The first meeting was productive as each member
introduced themselves along with their reasons for serving on the
committee. An overview of the current cooperative, Educational
Benefits Cooperative (EBC), the district belongs to was provided. The
district is in the first year of a 3-year membership. The cooperative
provides the district with some cost leverage for purchasing benefits and
allows the district to control the plan of benefits. Our current insurance
vendors are Blue Cross Blue Shield (PPO/HMO), Medco for
prescription, MetLife for dental, Reliance for life, and Discovery for
COBRA and Wellness.                                The goals of the
committee were also                                d i s cu ss ed .    Th e
preliminary goals seem                             to be 1) gaining a better
understanding of our                               current benefits and to
pass that information                              along to the staff 2)
explore other options                              that would meet the
staff & district’s needs.                          The committee is also
looking to create a                                survey for the staff
regarding insurance.                               The administrative
members of            the                          committee are Bob
Leonard, Kim Burke,                                Scott Snyder, Holly
Collin, David Brown, and Marianne Porreca. The Union members of the
committee along with their respective building are Tracy Mann and
Claudia from Middle School, Nicole Cooper and Bridget Hengels from
Intermediate, Elissa Barnabee and Ann Tussing from Elementary West,
Irena Hamadeh and Carrie Cross from Elementary East, Robin Payne
and Kathy Novak from Primary, and Julie Lucarelli from Transportation.
The Union’s Vice Presidents, Sharon Anday and Leslie Newman, and
Union President, Peter Lasko are also part of the committee. If you have
specific concerns or questions you would like to see the committee
address, please pass them along to one of the committee members.

More Related Content

Similar to Vol 10 issue 1

2012 caat s the support report-issue 1 en
2012 caat s the support report-issue 1 en2012 caat s the support report-issue 1 en
2012 caat s the support report-issue 1 enOPSEUCommunications
 
CPED Phase III Blueprint
CPED Phase III BlueprintCPED Phase III Blueprint
CPED Phase III BlueprintCPEDInitiative
 
RI Educator Autonomy New Draft Recommendations 6.2.14
RI Educator Autonomy New Draft Recommendations 6.2.14RI Educator Autonomy New Draft Recommendations 6.2.14
RI Educator Autonomy New Draft Recommendations 6.2.14ppageegd
 
Attachment #2 new items for june 2 2014
Attachment #2 new items for june 2 2014Attachment #2 new items for june 2 2014
Attachment #2 new items for june 2 2014ppageegd
 
RI Educator Autonomy: Draft new recommendations for consideration 6.2.14
RI Educator Autonomy: Draft new recommendations for consideration 6.2.14RI Educator Autonomy: Draft new recommendations for consideration 6.2.14
RI Educator Autonomy: Draft new recommendations for consideration 6.2.14
ppageegd
 
S w 908C20 PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT AT THE NATIO.docx
S w  908C20    PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT AT THE NATIO.docxS w  908C20    PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT AT THE NATIO.docx
S w 908C20 PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT AT THE NATIO.docx
agnesdcarey33086
 
MSDE Division Of Certification and Accreditation: Certification Restructuring
MSDE  Division Of Certification and Accreditation: Certification RestructuringMSDE  Division Of Certification and Accreditation: Certification Restructuring
MSDE Division Of Certification and Accreditation: Certification Restructuring
marylandeducators
 
Hb 153 evaluation presentation january 2012
Hb 153 evaluation presentation january 2012Hb 153 evaluation presentation january 2012
Hb 153 evaluation presentation january 2012
thespis3955
 
tendayswebinarseries-ppt-24-210629142335.pdf
tendayswebinarseries-ppt-24-210629142335.pdftendayswebinarseries-ppt-24-210629142335.pdf
tendayswebinarseries-ppt-24-210629142335.pdf
Madhu Bk B K
 
Quality Assurance Benchmarking in Higher Education
Quality Assurance Benchmarking in Higher EducationQuality Assurance Benchmarking in Higher Education
Quality Assurance Benchmarking in Higher Education
LATHASREEDHAR2
 
The following is a discussion on some key factors for a school to consider wh...
The following is a discussion on some key factors for a school to consider wh...The following is a discussion on some key factors for a school to consider wh...
The following is a discussion on some key factors for a school to consider wh...malacia
 
SB-191 - An Overview to Implementing Effective Evaluation
SB-191 - An Overview to Implementing Effective Evaluation SB-191 - An Overview to Implementing Effective Evaluation
SB-191 - An Overview to Implementing Effective Evaluation
CASELeaders
 
10 myths about appraisal final version (1)
10 myths about appraisal final version (1)10 myths about appraisal final version (1)
10 myths about appraisal final version (1)Julia Skinner
 
Waiver response from CECI
Waiver response from CECIWaiver response from CECI
Waiver response from CECI
Blacketor Consultants, LLC
 
Awsp framework version_2.0
Awsp framework version_2.0Awsp framework version_2.0
Awsp framework version_2.0
ailenebaxter
 
Seven Actions a Supply Chain Leader Can Take TodayThe value of t.docx
Seven Actions a Supply Chain Leader Can Take TodayThe value of t.docxSeven Actions a Supply Chain Leader Can Take TodayThe value of t.docx
Seven Actions a Supply Chain Leader Can Take TodayThe value of t.docx
klinda1
 
An Update on Teacher Evaluations
An Update on Teacher EvaluationsAn Update on Teacher Evaluations
An Update on Teacher EvaluationsISTA Slideshow
 

Similar to Vol 10 issue 1 (20)

Vol 10 issue 4
Vol 10 issue 4Vol 10 issue 4
Vol 10 issue 4
 
Vol 10 issue 2
Vol 10 issue 2Vol 10 issue 2
Vol 10 issue 2
 
2012 caat s the support report-issue 1 en
2012 caat s the support report-issue 1 en2012 caat s the support report-issue 1 en
2012 caat s the support report-issue 1 en
 
CPED Phase III Blueprint
CPED Phase III BlueprintCPED Phase III Blueprint
CPED Phase III Blueprint
 
RI Educator Autonomy New Draft Recommendations 6.2.14
RI Educator Autonomy New Draft Recommendations 6.2.14RI Educator Autonomy New Draft Recommendations 6.2.14
RI Educator Autonomy New Draft Recommendations 6.2.14
 
Attachment #2 new items for june 2 2014
Attachment #2 new items for june 2 2014Attachment #2 new items for june 2 2014
Attachment #2 new items for june 2 2014
 
RI Educator Autonomy: Draft new recommendations for consideration 6.2.14
RI Educator Autonomy: Draft new recommendations for consideration 6.2.14RI Educator Autonomy: Draft new recommendations for consideration 6.2.14
RI Educator Autonomy: Draft new recommendations for consideration 6.2.14
 
S w 908C20 PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT AT THE NATIO.docx
S w  908C20    PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT AT THE NATIO.docxS w  908C20    PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT AT THE NATIO.docx
S w 908C20 PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT AT THE NATIO.docx
 
MSDE Division Of Certification and Accreditation: Certification Restructuring
MSDE  Division Of Certification and Accreditation: Certification RestructuringMSDE  Division Of Certification and Accreditation: Certification Restructuring
MSDE Division Of Certification and Accreditation: Certification Restructuring
 
Hb 153 evaluation presentation january 2012
Hb 153 evaluation presentation january 2012Hb 153 evaluation presentation january 2012
Hb 153 evaluation presentation january 2012
 
tendayswebinarseries-ppt-24-210629142335.pdf
tendayswebinarseries-ppt-24-210629142335.pdftendayswebinarseries-ppt-24-210629142335.pdf
tendayswebinarseries-ppt-24-210629142335.pdf
 
Quality Assurance Benchmarking in Higher Education
Quality Assurance Benchmarking in Higher EducationQuality Assurance Benchmarking in Higher Education
Quality Assurance Benchmarking in Higher Education
 
The following is a discussion on some key factors for a school to consider wh...
The following is a discussion on some key factors for a school to consider wh...The following is a discussion on some key factors for a school to consider wh...
The following is a discussion on some key factors for a school to consider wh...
 
SB-191 - An Overview to Implementing Effective Evaluation
SB-191 - An Overview to Implementing Effective Evaluation SB-191 - An Overview to Implementing Effective Evaluation
SB-191 - An Overview to Implementing Effective Evaluation
 
10 myths about appraisal final version (1)
10 myths about appraisal final version (1)10 myths about appraisal final version (1)
10 myths about appraisal final version (1)
 
Waiver response from CECI
Waiver response from CECIWaiver response from CECI
Waiver response from CECI
 
Awsp framework version_2.0
Awsp framework version_2.0Awsp framework version_2.0
Awsp framework version_2.0
 
the 'E.V.E;' laws
the 'E.V.E;' lawsthe 'E.V.E;' laws
the 'E.V.E;' laws
 
Seven Actions a Supply Chain Leader Can Take TodayThe value of t.docx
Seven Actions a Supply Chain Leader Can Take TodayThe value of t.docxSeven Actions a Supply Chain Leader Can Take TodayThe value of t.docx
Seven Actions a Supply Chain Leader Can Take TodayThe value of t.docx
 
An Update on Teacher Evaluations
An Update on Teacher EvaluationsAn Update on Teacher Evaluations
An Update on Teacher Evaluations
 

Vol 10 issue 1

  • 1. WOODLAND UNITED V O L U M E 1 0 I S S U E 1 O C T O B E R 2 0 1 1 LPDC Becomes PDCC INSIDE The Local Professional Development Committee has become the T HI S Professional Development Certification Committee. The change in the I S S UE : committee’s name reflects a slight change in the recertification process. Instead of having to submit your Statement of Assurance to the former LPDC and having them approve it before being sent onto the Regional Office of Education (ROE) for their approval, now you LPDC 1 will submit your Statement of Assurance directly to the ROE for their Becomes approval. The Statement of Assurance, for your reference, is the final PDCC electronic document one submits after he/she has entered all of the appropriate CPDUs or coursework into ISBE’s online Educator Senate 2 Certification System. Since the ROE can handle this function, the Bill 7 need for the LPDC was not as strong. But the need for the staff to get assistance with the recertification process is still present, which is why the PDCC was put in place. This committee, which includes one PERA 3 member from each building, allows the staff to continue to have a colleague in their building in addition to the Human Resource Health 4 Department to help them with the recertification process. Each of the Insurance members on the PDCC previously served on the LPDC, so they are Committee very knowledgeable and will be a great resource for any staff member who certification needs to be renewed in the future. The committee members along with their respective building are Katie Jones – Primary, Linda Ufheil – Elementary West, Kerry Winston – Elementary East, Jeri Steele – Intermediate, and Jackie Beegun – Middle School.
  • 2. PAGE 2 Legislative Update - Senate Bill 7 This bill, effective this year, establishes new Reduction in Force (RIF) and recall procedures. The bill will also change the terminology used, as the reduction in force will be referred to as layoffs or honorable dismissals. The terms will be able to be used interchangeably and can include the honorable dismissal of tenured or non-tenured teachers. The first step is the categorization of teachers. The school district must categorize each teacher into one or more positions for which the teacher is legally qualified to hold and any other qualifications established by the district in a job description that may exist. This list must “committee be completed no later than May 10 of any school year prior to a must be school year during which a layoff might occur. A joint established committee composed of equal numbers of representatives and meet selected by the school board and the Union must be established. The committee must be established and meet for the first time on for the first or before December 1, 2011 in the initial year of the law. In the time on or initial year of the law, as well as the subsequent years, this joint before committee’s work is required to be completed by February 1 in order for the agreement of the joint committee to apply to the December 1, sequence of dismissal determined during that school year. 2011” Subject to the February 1 deadline for agreements, any agreement made by the joint committee remain in effect until amended or terminated by the joint committee. Also, within each position and subject to the agreements made by the joint committee on layoffs by February 1 of each school year, the school district must establish four grouping of teachers qualified to hold positions. In the end, the district must, in consultation with the Union, provide an honorable dismissal list categorized by positions and four groupings. Copies of this list must be distributed to the Union at least 75 days before the end of the school year. The groups will be partially determined by a teacher’s performance evaluation. An edition of Woodland United focusing on the new laws will include information on the four groups and the procedure for honorable dismissals will be published in the next month. WOODLAND UNITED
  • 3. PAGE 3 Performance Evaluation Reform Act - PERA This legislation put evaluators by recommendations into place a new September 1, 2012. for the Illinois State teacher evaluation The training shall be Board of Education system that provided or (ISBE) on rules, incorporates approved by ISBE. default models, and measures of student PERA also requires state supports for the “incorporates growth along with the establishment of new evaluation measures of the traditional a Union/ system. The council student professional administration includes three practice. The most committee to subcommittees that growth” immediate negotiate the use of meet between the application of the data as part of the monthly PEAC new legislation is incorporation of meetings. The the requirement of 4 student growth subcommittees are rating categories by measures. One for the teacher September 1, 2012. important part of evaluation design, The four rating PERA that must be principal evaluation categories will be kept in mind is that design, and excellent, proficient, the inclusion of evaluator training, needs improvement, student growth in a prequalification and and unsatisfactory. teacher’s evaluation support. More The district and won’t be information Union will be implemented until regarding PEAC and working to September 1, 2016. it’s incorporate these Between now and recommendations to new rating then many of the ISBE can be found categories into our preliminary ideas at http:// current rating regarding this www.isbe.net/peac/. categories important new More information on (excellent, aspect of a teacher’s the new rating satisfactory, and evaluation will categories will be unsatisfactory). finalized. The included in the same Another important Performance edition of Woodland component of PERA Evaluation Advisory United that focuses is the required Council (PEAC) has on the groups for evaluator training been meeting since honorable dismissals and pre- May of 2010 to outlined in Senate qualifications for all create Bill 7. WOODLAND UNITED
  • 4. VOLUME 10 ISSUE 1 PAGE 4 Health Insurance Committee The joint committee comprised of Union and Administration representatives has been established and held their first monthly meeting on September 27th. The first meeting was productive as each member introduced themselves along with their reasons for serving on the committee. An overview of the current cooperative, Educational Benefits Cooperative (EBC), the district belongs to was provided. The district is in the first year of a 3-year membership. The cooperative provides the district with some cost leverage for purchasing benefits and allows the district to control the plan of benefits. Our current insurance vendors are Blue Cross Blue Shield (PPO/HMO), Medco for prescription, MetLife for dental, Reliance for life, and Discovery for COBRA and Wellness. The goals of the committee were also d i s cu ss ed . Th e preliminary goals seem to be 1) gaining a better understanding of our current benefits and to pass that information along to the staff 2) explore other options that would meet the staff & district’s needs. The committee is also looking to create a survey for the staff regarding insurance. The administrative members of the committee are Bob Leonard, Kim Burke, Scott Snyder, Holly Collin, David Brown, and Marianne Porreca. The Union members of the committee along with their respective building are Tracy Mann and Claudia from Middle School, Nicole Cooper and Bridget Hengels from Intermediate, Elissa Barnabee and Ann Tussing from Elementary West, Irena Hamadeh and Carrie Cross from Elementary East, Robin Payne and Kathy Novak from Primary, and Julie Lucarelli from Transportation. The Union’s Vice Presidents, Sharon Anday and Leslie Newman, and Union President, Peter Lasko are also part of the committee. If you have specific concerns or questions you would like to see the committee address, please pass them along to one of the committee members.