SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 4
WOODLAND UNITED
                        V O L U M E    1 0   I S S U E   3                     J A N U A R Y   2 0 1 2




                     Joint Honorable Dismissal Committee - JHDC
INSIDE               The committee that has been given the task to determine the qualifications, as
                     matters permitted under the laws included in Senate Bill 7, for the four groupings
T HI S               has been named the Joint Honorable Dismissal Committee (JHDC). The
                     committee has equal representatives from the administration and Union. Union
I S S UE :
                     representatives include Katie Jones from Primary, Darlene Lipczynski from
                     Elementary West, Karen Barrett from Intermediate, Sharon Anday (Vice
                     President for Certified Staff) from Middle School, and Peter Lasko (President)
                     from Elementary East. Administrative representatives are Joy Swoboda, Steve
                     Thomas, Kim Burke, Carla Little (Board member), and Ken Hyllberg (EE
Joint          1-2   Principal). The JHDC has already met several times. The committee is
Honorable            permitted under the law to address five specific items.
Dismissal
Committee            The five items the committee can address include:
                            1) Examine criteria for excluding from Group 2 and placing into Group 3
                                 a teacher whose last two summatives include “Unsatisfactory”/“Needs
                                 Improvement” and either a “Satisfactory”/“Proficient” or “Excellent”
Negotiations    3           2) Develop an alternative definition for Group 4, which must take into
Update                           account prior summatives and may also take into account other factors
                                 that relate to the school’s educational objective. The alternative
                                 definition MAY NOT permit the inclusion of a teacher with a “Needs
                                 Improvement” or “Unsatisfactory” summative rating on either of the
                                 teacher’s last two summatives.
Sick Bank       3           3) Determine whether or not to include summative ratings from other
                                 schools district for teachers who have not been employed at
                                 Woodland long enough to have a sufficient number of evaluations.
                            4) Determine the basis for assigning an appropriate rating that complies
Insurance       4                with the four rating categories (Unsatisfactory, Needs Improvement,
Committee                        Proficient, and Excellent) that must be in place by September 2012.
                            5) Look at a committee member’s right to request an honorable dismissal
                                 list from the Board of Education. The list will show the most recent
                                 and prior summative rating of each teacher only identified by length
                                 of continued service in the district, NOT by name. The list can be
                                 used to monitor trend data.          Specifically, whether or not a
                                 disproportionate number of teachers with more seniority are receiving
                                 a most recent summative rating that is lower than a prior one.
PAGE 2

                 Joint Honorable Dismissal Committee - JHDC continued
                 All of the agreements on the items listed on the previous page MUST BE
                 agreed on by a majority vote of all committee members. Please note the
                 references made to the inclusion of the “Needs Improvement” rating will take
                 effect after September 2012. At that point, the descriptors for the category will
                 have been finalized through the work of an evaluation committee that will be
                 established in the near future. Future editions of the “Woodland United” will
                 keep members apprised of the evaluation committee’s work. In the meantime,
                 the JHDC will work with our current three evaluation ratings: Unsatisfactory,
                 Satisfactory, and Excellent.


“All of the
agreements       JHDC Timeline:
MUST BE
agreed on by a        December 1, 2011 Joint Honorable Dismissal Committee must meet
majority vote                          on or before said date.
of all
                      February 1, 2012     Last date for Joint Committee to meet; must have
committee
                                           established four groups of teachers for purposes of
members.”
                                           dismissal.

                      March 19, 2012       Due date for sequence of honorable dismissal list
                                           (75 calendar days prior to last day) - completed
                                           by administration and shared with Union.

                      April 17, 2012       Final date for honorable dismissal notices to be
                                           given (45 calendar days prior to last day) –
                                           completed by administration and shared with
                                           Union.

                      May 10, 2012         Due date for local qualifications changes for
                                           FY13 sequence of honorable dismissal.




WOODLAND UNITED
VOLUME      10   ISSUE    3                                                                   PAGE      3




Negotiations Update
                     The negotiation team thanks all of the members who took time to complete
                     the initial survey available through Survey Monkey. We will use this
                     important information gathered from our members to help guide us through
                     the negotiations process. The team will continue to seek out your input
                     during negotiations when appropriate (and time permitting) as the process
                     can be very fluid. Remember, any agreements reached early in the process
                     could be impacted by agreements on different contractual items that come
up later in the process. As a result, the team is only able to present a final package to you. At
that time, the team is hopeful we will be able to share the information gathered from the
members that supported the negotiation team’s decision. In the meantime, we have been
advised by our LCFT Field Service Director, Matt Beverly, not to share any of the information
gathered. He has agreed to work with the Union President to find ways to provide the members
with appropriate information that won’t be harmful to the negotiations process. The
negotiations team must also consider and be respectful of the negotiation ground rules in
regards to confidentiality agreed upon by the Union and Board of Education. In regards to
Memos of Understanding (MOUs), the team will just be reviewing any old ones in order to
decide whether or not they are folded into a new contract.



Sick Bank
Currently, Sick Bank (Article VII, Section B) allows staff members
to have access to a maximum of ten additional paid sick days, after
one day’s absence without pay, provided the staff member meets
certain criteria. These days are provided for the staff by the Board
of Education. The first criterion is that the employee has exhausted
all accumulated sick leave. Another important requirement is the
sick bank can only be utilized for catastrophic, serious, prolonged,
acute and/or chronic illness of the employee (including intermittent sickness related to treatment of
such illness). The sick bank is not intended to be used for ordinary illnesses or elective
surgery. A recent exception was made due to extraordinary circumstances, which were presented
by the Union to the Superintendent for consideration. The Union President, on behalf of the
employee, shall recommend to the Superintendent the use of the sick leave bank. A sick bank built
upon days being contributed by both employees and the Board of Education is being considered.
This type of sick bank exists in many other districts. Please be on the lookout for a survey on this
topic, which will allow your negotiation team to get important feedback on if the staff would favor
such a sick bank and how they would like it to be set up.
Insurance Committee
        PAGE   4




                      The insurance           Primary, Julie           has been approved
                      committee has been      Lucarelli from           by the committee;
                      working since the       Transportation, and      with members of the
                      end of September.       Bob Leonard, Kim         committee from their
                      The committee is        Burke, Scott Snyder,     respective building
                      comprised of            Holly Collin, David      present. The
                      administrative          Brown, Marianna          committee also has
                      representatives,        Porreca from the         been provided
                      Union                   administration. The      comparative data
                      representatives from    committee has met        from a representative
                      each building and       once a month since       from the district’s
                      transportation, along   our first meeting in     cooperative, EBC
                      with the President,     September to learn       (Educational Benefit
                      Peter Lasko, and        more about our           Cooperative), which
                      Vice-Presidents,        current benefits, and    has 81 public school
“The results of
                      Leslie Newman and       to review other          districts as members
this survey will
                      Sharon Anday, of        available insurance      including three
be shared             the Union. The          options that could       others in the area:
during a staff        members include         meet the Union’s         Warren, Mundelein
meeting at            Tracy Mann and          and district’s needs.    HS, and Beach Park.
each building.”       Claudia Michaels        The committee also       Briefly, a
                      from Middle School,     gathered staff input     cooperative is a
                      Nicole Cooper and       on our current plan      group-purchasing
                      Bridget Hengels         and options they         vehicle for employee
                      from Intermediate,      would consider for       benefits that
                      Elissa Barnabee and     the future. The          employs the leverage
                      Ann Tussing from        results of this survey   of large numbers to
                      Elementary West,        will be shared during    obtain the lowest
                      Irina Hamideh and       a staff meeting at       possible unit price.
                      Carrie Cross from       each building. Bob
                      Elementary East,        Leonard will give a
                      Robin Payne and         power point
                      Kathy Novak from        presentation which

           WOODLAND   UNITED

More Related Content

Similar to Vol 10 issue 3

2012 caat s the support report-issue 1 en
2012 caat s the support report-issue 1 en2012 caat s the support report-issue 1 en
2012 caat s the support report-issue 1 enOPSEUCommunications
 
06 formation of redevelopment committee
06   formation of redevelopment committee06   formation of redevelopment committee
06 formation of redevelopment committeespandane
 
EDLD 5333 Leadership for Accountability assignment 5
EDLD 5333 Leadership for Accountability assignment 5EDLD 5333 Leadership for Accountability assignment 5
EDLD 5333 Leadership for Accountability assignment 5Derek Fitzhenry
 
USC_governance_review
USC_governance_reviewUSC_governance_review
USC_governance_reviewCathy Clarke
 
BUSI 460 – LT Assignment Brief 1 ACADEMIC YEAR 2020 – S.docx
BUSI 460 – LT Assignment Brief 1 ACADEMIC YEAR  2020 – S.docxBUSI 460 – LT Assignment Brief 1 ACADEMIC YEAR  2020 – S.docx
BUSI 460 – LT Assignment Brief 1 ACADEMIC YEAR 2020 – S.docxfelicidaddinwoodie
 
BUSI 460 – LT Assignment Brief 1 ACADEMIC YEAR 2020 – S.docx
BUSI 460 – LT Assignment Brief 1 ACADEMIC YEAR  2020 – S.docxBUSI 460 – LT Assignment Brief 1 ACADEMIC YEAR  2020 – S.docx
BUSI 460 – LT Assignment Brief 1 ACADEMIC YEAR 2020 – S.docxrichardnorman90310
 
Simulation descriptions 1_0
Simulation descriptions 1_0Simulation descriptions 1_0
Simulation descriptions 1_0IIIM
 
External Environment
External Environment  External Environment
External Environment jo bitonio
 
Rocket Fuel: Building Your Startup’s Governance Power
Rocket Fuel: Building Your Startup’s Governance PowerRocket Fuel: Building Your Startup’s Governance Power
Rocket Fuel: Building Your Startup’s Governance PowerNFCACoops
 
CBSA_JLP_Workshop_Union_-_Management_Consultation_example
CBSA_JLP_Workshop_Union_-_Management_Consultation_exampleCBSA_JLP_Workshop_Union_-_Management_Consultation_example
CBSA_JLP_Workshop_Union_-_Management_Consultation_exampleAngelo Mangatal
 
2015_board_committee_structure_report
2015_board_committee_structure_report2015_board_committee_structure_report
2015_board_committee_structure_reportAlison H. Climo
 

Similar to Vol 10 issue 3 (20)

Vol 10 issue 4
Vol 10 issue 4Vol 10 issue 4
Vol 10 issue 4
 
2012 caat s the support report-issue 1 en
2012 caat s the support report-issue 1 en2012 caat s the support report-issue 1 en
2012 caat s the support report-issue 1 en
 
Vol 10 issue 2
Vol 10 issue 2Vol 10 issue 2
Vol 10 issue 2
 
DCSD Feedback
DCSD FeedbackDCSD Feedback
DCSD Feedback
 
06 formation of redevelopment committee
06   formation of redevelopment committee06   formation of redevelopment committee
06 formation of redevelopment committee
 
Note 2
Note 2Note 2
Note 2
 
EDLD 5333 Leadership for Accountability assignment 5
EDLD 5333 Leadership for Accountability assignment 5EDLD 5333 Leadership for Accountability assignment 5
EDLD 5333 Leadership for Accountability assignment 5
 
the 'E.V.E;' laws
the 'E.V.E;' lawsthe 'E.V.E;' laws
the 'E.V.E;' laws
 
USC_governance_review
USC_governance_reviewUSC_governance_review
USC_governance_review
 
BUSI 460 – LT Assignment Brief 1 ACADEMIC YEAR 2020 – S.docx
BUSI 460 – LT Assignment Brief 1 ACADEMIC YEAR  2020 – S.docxBUSI 460 – LT Assignment Brief 1 ACADEMIC YEAR  2020 – S.docx
BUSI 460 – LT Assignment Brief 1 ACADEMIC YEAR 2020 – S.docx
 
BUSI 460 – LT Assignment Brief 1 ACADEMIC YEAR 2020 – S.docx
BUSI 460 – LT Assignment Brief 1 ACADEMIC YEAR  2020 – S.docxBUSI 460 – LT Assignment Brief 1 ACADEMIC YEAR  2020 – S.docx
BUSI 460 – LT Assignment Brief 1 ACADEMIC YEAR 2020 – S.docx
 
Simulation descriptions 1_0
Simulation descriptions 1_0Simulation descriptions 1_0
Simulation descriptions 1_0
 
External Environment
External Environment  External Environment
External Environment
 
Rural cooperative credit_institutions_nabard
Rural cooperative credit_institutions_nabardRural cooperative credit_institutions_nabard
Rural cooperative credit_institutions_nabard
 
Rocket Fuel: Building Your Startup’s Governance Power
Rocket Fuel: Building Your Startup’s Governance PowerRocket Fuel: Building Your Startup’s Governance Power
Rocket Fuel: Building Your Startup’s Governance Power
 
ORGANISING COMMITTEE
ORGANISING COMMITTEEORGANISING COMMITTEE
ORGANISING COMMITTEE
 
CBSA_JLP_Workshop_Union_-_Management_Consultation_example
CBSA_JLP_Workshop_Union_-_Management_Consultation_exampleCBSA_JLP_Workshop_Union_-_Management_Consultation_example
CBSA_JLP_Workshop_Union_-_Management_Consultation_example
 
2015_board_committee_structure_report
2015_board_committee_structure_report2015_board_committee_structure_report
2015_board_committee_structure_report
 
FCN Charter version 1-2 Adopted Jan 10 2012
FCN Charter version 1-2 Adopted Jan 10 2012FCN Charter version 1-2 Adopted Jan 10 2012
FCN Charter version 1-2 Adopted Jan 10 2012
 
04 sboe duties presentation 12 4 [autosaved]
04 sboe duties presentation 12 4 [autosaved]04 sboe duties presentation 12 4 [autosaved]
04 sboe duties presentation 12 4 [autosaved]
 

Vol 10 issue 3

  • 1. WOODLAND UNITED V O L U M E 1 0 I S S U E 3 J A N U A R Y 2 0 1 2 Joint Honorable Dismissal Committee - JHDC INSIDE The committee that has been given the task to determine the qualifications, as matters permitted under the laws included in Senate Bill 7, for the four groupings T HI S has been named the Joint Honorable Dismissal Committee (JHDC). The committee has equal representatives from the administration and Union. Union I S S UE : representatives include Katie Jones from Primary, Darlene Lipczynski from Elementary West, Karen Barrett from Intermediate, Sharon Anday (Vice President for Certified Staff) from Middle School, and Peter Lasko (President) from Elementary East. Administrative representatives are Joy Swoboda, Steve Thomas, Kim Burke, Carla Little (Board member), and Ken Hyllberg (EE Joint 1-2 Principal). The JHDC has already met several times. The committee is Honorable permitted under the law to address five specific items. Dismissal Committee The five items the committee can address include: 1) Examine criteria for excluding from Group 2 and placing into Group 3 a teacher whose last two summatives include “Unsatisfactory”/“Needs Improvement” and either a “Satisfactory”/“Proficient” or “Excellent” Negotiations 3 2) Develop an alternative definition for Group 4, which must take into Update account prior summatives and may also take into account other factors that relate to the school’s educational objective. The alternative definition MAY NOT permit the inclusion of a teacher with a “Needs Improvement” or “Unsatisfactory” summative rating on either of the teacher’s last two summatives. Sick Bank 3 3) Determine whether or not to include summative ratings from other schools district for teachers who have not been employed at Woodland long enough to have a sufficient number of evaluations. 4) Determine the basis for assigning an appropriate rating that complies Insurance 4 with the four rating categories (Unsatisfactory, Needs Improvement, Committee Proficient, and Excellent) that must be in place by September 2012. 5) Look at a committee member’s right to request an honorable dismissal list from the Board of Education. The list will show the most recent and prior summative rating of each teacher only identified by length of continued service in the district, NOT by name. The list can be used to monitor trend data. Specifically, whether or not a disproportionate number of teachers with more seniority are receiving a most recent summative rating that is lower than a prior one.
  • 2. PAGE 2 Joint Honorable Dismissal Committee - JHDC continued All of the agreements on the items listed on the previous page MUST BE agreed on by a majority vote of all committee members. Please note the references made to the inclusion of the “Needs Improvement” rating will take effect after September 2012. At that point, the descriptors for the category will have been finalized through the work of an evaluation committee that will be established in the near future. Future editions of the “Woodland United” will keep members apprised of the evaluation committee’s work. In the meantime, the JHDC will work with our current three evaluation ratings: Unsatisfactory, Satisfactory, and Excellent. “All of the agreements JHDC Timeline: MUST BE agreed on by a December 1, 2011 Joint Honorable Dismissal Committee must meet majority vote on or before said date. of all February 1, 2012 Last date for Joint Committee to meet; must have committee established four groups of teachers for purposes of members.” dismissal. March 19, 2012 Due date for sequence of honorable dismissal list (75 calendar days prior to last day) - completed by administration and shared with Union. April 17, 2012 Final date for honorable dismissal notices to be given (45 calendar days prior to last day) – completed by administration and shared with Union. May 10, 2012 Due date for local qualifications changes for FY13 sequence of honorable dismissal. WOODLAND UNITED
  • 3. VOLUME 10 ISSUE 3 PAGE 3 Negotiations Update The negotiation team thanks all of the members who took time to complete the initial survey available through Survey Monkey. We will use this important information gathered from our members to help guide us through the negotiations process. The team will continue to seek out your input during negotiations when appropriate (and time permitting) as the process can be very fluid. Remember, any agreements reached early in the process could be impacted by agreements on different contractual items that come up later in the process. As a result, the team is only able to present a final package to you. At that time, the team is hopeful we will be able to share the information gathered from the members that supported the negotiation team’s decision. In the meantime, we have been advised by our LCFT Field Service Director, Matt Beverly, not to share any of the information gathered. He has agreed to work with the Union President to find ways to provide the members with appropriate information that won’t be harmful to the negotiations process. The negotiations team must also consider and be respectful of the negotiation ground rules in regards to confidentiality agreed upon by the Union and Board of Education. In regards to Memos of Understanding (MOUs), the team will just be reviewing any old ones in order to decide whether or not they are folded into a new contract. Sick Bank Currently, Sick Bank (Article VII, Section B) allows staff members to have access to a maximum of ten additional paid sick days, after one day’s absence without pay, provided the staff member meets certain criteria. These days are provided for the staff by the Board of Education. The first criterion is that the employee has exhausted all accumulated sick leave. Another important requirement is the sick bank can only be utilized for catastrophic, serious, prolonged, acute and/or chronic illness of the employee (including intermittent sickness related to treatment of such illness). The sick bank is not intended to be used for ordinary illnesses or elective surgery. A recent exception was made due to extraordinary circumstances, which were presented by the Union to the Superintendent for consideration. The Union President, on behalf of the employee, shall recommend to the Superintendent the use of the sick leave bank. A sick bank built upon days being contributed by both employees and the Board of Education is being considered. This type of sick bank exists in many other districts. Please be on the lookout for a survey on this topic, which will allow your negotiation team to get important feedback on if the staff would favor such a sick bank and how they would like it to be set up.
  • 4. Insurance Committee PAGE 4 The insurance Primary, Julie has been approved committee has been Lucarelli from by the committee; working since the Transportation, and with members of the end of September. Bob Leonard, Kim committee from their The committee is Burke, Scott Snyder, respective building comprised of Holly Collin, David present. The administrative Brown, Marianna committee also has representatives, Porreca from the been provided Union administration. The comparative data representatives from committee has met from a representative each building and once a month since from the district’s transportation, along our first meeting in cooperative, EBC with the President, September to learn (Educational Benefit Peter Lasko, and more about our Cooperative), which Vice-Presidents, current benefits, and has 81 public school “The results of Leslie Newman and to review other districts as members this survey will Sharon Anday, of available insurance including three be shared the Union. The options that could others in the area: during a staff members include meet the Union’s Warren, Mundelein meeting at Tracy Mann and and district’s needs. HS, and Beach Park. each building.” Claudia Michaels The committee also Briefly, a from Middle School, gathered staff input cooperative is a Nicole Cooper and on our current plan group-purchasing Bridget Hengels and options they vehicle for employee from Intermediate, would consider for benefits that Elissa Barnabee and the future. The employs the leverage Ann Tussing from results of this survey of large numbers to Elementary West, will be shared during obtain the lowest Irina Hamideh and a staff meeting at possible unit price. Carrie Cross from each building. Bob Elementary East, Leonard will give a Robin Payne and power point Kathy Novak from presentation which WOODLAND UNITED