Responses of soil biotas to human impacts: from local to global
Victoria J. Burton1,2, Paul Eggleton2
1Science and Solutions for a Changing Planet DTP, and the Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, UK
2Soil Biodiversity Group, The Natural History Museum, London, UK
INTRODUCTION
Soil fauna are significant mediators of the ecosystem services
provided by soil (Fig. 1). Despite this, soil biota are rarely included in
models of how biodiversity will respond to land use change and the
subsequent impacts on ecosystem services.
The high biodiversity of soil ecosystems is often attributed to their
spatial heterogeneity at multiple scales, but studies on the small scale
spatial distribution of soil macrofauna are rare. This study of a 7.7 Ha
woodland on the Isle of Wight, southern England demonstrates the
importance of microhabitats on soil invertebrate communities.
REFERENCES
[1] D. Carpenter et. al. (2012) Biodiversity of soil macrofauna in the New Forest: a benchmark study across a national park landscape, Biodivers. Conserv. 21, 3385–3410.
[2] R Core Team (2013) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing.
[3] C.J.F. ter Braak, P. Šmilauer (2012) Canoco reference manual and user’s guide: software for ordination, version 5.0., Microcomputer Power, Ithaca, USA.
[4] T. Newbold et. al. (2014) A global model of the response of tropical and sub-tropical forest biodiversity to anthropogenic pressures, Proc. R. Soc. B, 281, 1792.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Thanks to: landowners Angela and Michael Burton, members of the Natural History Museum Soil Biodiversity Group and the PREDICTS project. Thanks also to the following who helped with
identification: Sholto Holdsworth (beetles), Paul Lee (millipedes), Mike Fox (ants), Steve Gregory (woodlice) and Emma Sherlock (earthworms). Thanks to the Watford Coleoptera Group for the
photograph of Acalles ptinoides.
Location of data sources in the PREDICTS database
Data sources related to soil in the PREDICTS database
Figure 6 proportions of PREDICTS data sources related to soil
Figure 2 Study site and sample locations
Want to contribute?
If you have suitable data I would love to hear from you!
All contributors of data I use will be included as co-authors on an
open-access paper on the database and acknowledged
appropriately in all publications.
Please talk to me, pick up a flyer or email v.burton@nhm.ac.uk
Figure 1 an earthworm in its
burrow. The activity of
earthworms reduces flood risk
by increasing water infiltration.
METHODS
Winkler bags and hand sorting as per [1] were used to extract
leaf litter and soil invertebrates, respectively, of seven major
groups in 11 microhabitats (Fig. 2). Community composition
was analysed using indicspecies package in R 3.1.0 [2] and
Canonical Correspondence Analysis or Redundancy Analysis
(RDA) as appropriate, using CANOCO 5.02 [3]
Intensive Extensive
Urban Rural
Many other studies Your study?
@SoilScholar
@SBG_nhm
#PREDICTSproject
Figure 4 Soil Biodiversity Group study sites Figure 5 the PREDICTS design
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Soil and litter invertebrates showed microhabitat-specific species
assemblages, with samples in the plantation area less diverse than
those in the deciduous area. Dead wood habitats had distinct leaf
litter assemblages (Fig. 3), with a high proportion of saproxylic
species.
Figure 3 RDA triplot of leaf litter invertebrates, showing microhabitats have
different species assemblages, particularly the dead wood microhabitats
This highlights the need to consider and quantify small-scale
heterogeneity when developing models of soil communities.
Samples
Plantation Deciduous
Mixed litter
Logs
Moss
Path
Stumps
Bluebells
Ivy
Coppice
Stumps
Acalles ptinoides
(ACApti)
Indicator species for mixed
litter and plantation stumps
(P = 0.01)
Oniscus asellus
(iONIase)
Indicator species for stumps
and logs
(P = 0.01)
FUTURE WORK
At a local scale this study demonstrates the impact of
land-use change (conversion of deciduous woodland to
plantation) on soil and litter invertebrates, and the high
spatial heterogeneity of these communities.
We are seeking to collate and build a database of other
studies that compare sites with different land-use types or
intensities to estimate average effects of human impacts
on soil and litter communities, using techniques developed
within the PREDICTS project (www.predicts.org.uk) [4]
(Fig 5).
This will also include unpublished data from
the Natural History Museum Soil Biodiversity
Group (Fig. 4), existing relevant data in the
PREDICTS database (Fig. 6), new data on
earthworm assemblages using Citizen
Science approaches and new data collection
on soil microbial-invertebrate interactions.

VJBurtonGSBIconferenceposter

  • 1.
    Responses of soilbiotas to human impacts: from local to global Victoria J. Burton1,2, Paul Eggleton2 1Science and Solutions for a Changing Planet DTP, and the Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, UK 2Soil Biodiversity Group, The Natural History Museum, London, UK INTRODUCTION Soil fauna are significant mediators of the ecosystem services provided by soil (Fig. 1). Despite this, soil biota are rarely included in models of how biodiversity will respond to land use change and the subsequent impacts on ecosystem services. The high biodiversity of soil ecosystems is often attributed to their spatial heterogeneity at multiple scales, but studies on the small scale spatial distribution of soil macrofauna are rare. This study of a 7.7 Ha woodland on the Isle of Wight, southern England demonstrates the importance of microhabitats on soil invertebrate communities. REFERENCES [1] D. Carpenter et. al. (2012) Biodiversity of soil macrofauna in the New Forest: a benchmark study across a national park landscape, Biodivers. Conserv. 21, 3385–3410. [2] R Core Team (2013) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. [3] C.J.F. ter Braak, P. Šmilauer (2012) Canoco reference manual and user’s guide: software for ordination, version 5.0., Microcomputer Power, Ithaca, USA. [4] T. Newbold et. al. (2014) A global model of the response of tropical and sub-tropical forest biodiversity to anthropogenic pressures, Proc. R. Soc. B, 281, 1792. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Thanks to: landowners Angela and Michael Burton, members of the Natural History Museum Soil Biodiversity Group and the PREDICTS project. Thanks also to the following who helped with identification: Sholto Holdsworth (beetles), Paul Lee (millipedes), Mike Fox (ants), Steve Gregory (woodlice) and Emma Sherlock (earthworms). Thanks to the Watford Coleoptera Group for the photograph of Acalles ptinoides. Location of data sources in the PREDICTS database Data sources related to soil in the PREDICTS database Figure 6 proportions of PREDICTS data sources related to soil Figure 2 Study site and sample locations Want to contribute? If you have suitable data I would love to hear from you! All contributors of data I use will be included as co-authors on an open-access paper on the database and acknowledged appropriately in all publications. Please talk to me, pick up a flyer or email v.burton@nhm.ac.uk Figure 1 an earthworm in its burrow. The activity of earthworms reduces flood risk by increasing water infiltration. METHODS Winkler bags and hand sorting as per [1] were used to extract leaf litter and soil invertebrates, respectively, of seven major groups in 11 microhabitats (Fig. 2). Community composition was analysed using indicspecies package in R 3.1.0 [2] and Canonical Correspondence Analysis or Redundancy Analysis (RDA) as appropriate, using CANOCO 5.02 [3] Intensive Extensive Urban Rural Many other studies Your study? @SoilScholar @SBG_nhm #PREDICTSproject Figure 4 Soil Biodiversity Group study sites Figure 5 the PREDICTS design RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Soil and litter invertebrates showed microhabitat-specific species assemblages, with samples in the plantation area less diverse than those in the deciduous area. Dead wood habitats had distinct leaf litter assemblages (Fig. 3), with a high proportion of saproxylic species. Figure 3 RDA triplot of leaf litter invertebrates, showing microhabitats have different species assemblages, particularly the dead wood microhabitats This highlights the need to consider and quantify small-scale heterogeneity when developing models of soil communities. Samples Plantation Deciduous Mixed litter Logs Moss Path Stumps Bluebells Ivy Coppice Stumps Acalles ptinoides (ACApti) Indicator species for mixed litter and plantation stumps (P = 0.01) Oniscus asellus (iONIase) Indicator species for stumps and logs (P = 0.01) FUTURE WORK At a local scale this study demonstrates the impact of land-use change (conversion of deciduous woodland to plantation) on soil and litter invertebrates, and the high spatial heterogeneity of these communities. We are seeking to collate and build a database of other studies that compare sites with different land-use types or intensities to estimate average effects of human impacts on soil and litter communities, using techniques developed within the PREDICTS project (www.predicts.org.uk) [4] (Fig 5). This will also include unpublished data from the Natural History Museum Soil Biodiversity Group (Fig. 4), existing relevant data in the PREDICTS database (Fig. 6), new data on earthworm assemblages using Citizen Science approaches and new data collection on soil microbial-invertebrate interactions.