Virendra vs state of up
•
0 likes•225 views
The Supreme Court of India dismissed a writ petition seeking directions for the expeditious disposal of a criminal appeal pending in the High Court. The petitioner had been in jail for 21 years without remission while awaiting the outcome of the appeal. The Supreme Court gave the petitioner liberty to file a fresh bail application in the pending criminal appeal before the High Court. The Court observed that if a bail application is filed, the High Court shall consider it forthwith. The Court expected the High Court to decide any bail application within one month of filing.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Download to read offline
Recommended
Sc order deshmukh plea
The Supreme Court of India dismissed special leave petitions filed by Anil Deshmukh challenging a Bombay High Court order directing a preliminary inquiry by an independent agency into allegations against Deshmukh, who was formerly the Home Minister of Maharashtra. The Court said the serious nature of the allegations required an independent inquiry and it was not persuaded by the arguments that an inquiry was not needed since Deshmukh had resigned.
Mp hc phc in prisons
The court considered an application for suspension of sentence from appellant Lalji Singh who was convicted of murder and other charges, and granted a further 90 day suspension of his sentence due to his heart ailment and the lack of proper medical facilities and transport in the jail. The court directed the state to improve primary healthcare in jails, including establishing on-site health centers, and to submit a report on current medical facilities, citing precedents requiring protection of prisoners' human rights.
Sc order uapa sep 9
The Supreme Court of India allowed an appeal challenging the judgment of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh. The appellants were arrested in connection with offenses under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act and sought bail after 90 days as no chargesheet was filed. The High Court had rejected bail, noting the extension granted to the investigation. However, the Supreme Court held that under its previous judgment, the Magistrate did not have jurisdiction to extend the investigation period for UAPA offenses. Therefore, the appellants were entitled to default bail as the investigation was not completed within the prescribed period. The Court directed the appellants be released on bail and for the trial to be concluded expeditiously.
July delhi hc order
1. Gulfisha Fatima filed a writ petition seeking a writ of habeas corpus to direct the State to produce her and release her from what she claims is illegal custody.
2. She was arrested in connection with multiple FIRs including charges under the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act. Her bail applications were dismissed except for one case where she was granted bail.
3. The court dismissed the writ petition stating that her detention was not illegal as she was in judicial custody pursuant to court orders and the remedy lies in appealing those orders, not through a writ of habeas corpus.
Gauhati hc 482 inherent juris for foreigner order
1) The petitioner, Md. Amir Khan, filed a petition seeking to quash the order that convicted him under the Foreigners Act for illegally residing in India.
2) The trial court had framed charges and the petitioner had pled guilty, receiving a two year prison sentence and fine.
3) The petitioner now claims he is not a foreigner but a citizen of Tripura, India based on birth and school documents. However, he did not provide these documents during the investigation or trial.
4) The high court dismissed the petition, finding no illegality in the trial court's order since the petitioner pled guilty without presenting any evidence and the documents are produced only after appealing the conviction.
27345 2021 34_3_33174_order_07-feb-2022
The Supreme Court of India heard a writ petition and related interlocutory applications. The Court had previously passed an order on January 10th, 2022 protecting the applicant from harassment. However, that order was not formally served on the Superintendent of Police. As a result, a notice was issued to the applicant requiring his attendance. The Court clarified that the applicant remains protected by the previous order and no further steps shall be taken pursuant to the notice. The Court directed the State of Tripura to communicate copies of both the present and previous orders to the Superintendent of Police to ensure compliance and prevent harassment of the applicant. The interlocutory applications were disposed of.
Sc order denying yogeshraj bail
1) The Supreme Court of India heard petitions related to the criminal case against individuals accused of lynching a police officer who was investigating cow slaughter.
2) One of the accused, Lokendra, was already in custody while another accused, Yogeshraj, had been released on bail.
3) The Court stayed the order granting bail to Yogeshraj and directed him to surrender within seven days, considering the serious nature of the case where a police officer was lynched under the pretext of investigating cow slaughter.
4) The Court sought a report from the trial court on how much time was needed to frame charges and record testimonies of independent witnesses, as charges had not yet been framed in
Allahabad hc order yogeshraj bail
Yogeshraj applied for bail in Case Crime No. 583 of 2018 under Section 124-A IPC at the Police Station of Syana, District Bulandshahar. His counsel argued he is entitled to bail on the grounds of parity since the co-accused Ashish Kumar was granted bail in an identical case. The prosecution opposed bail but did not dispute the claim of parity. The court granted bail to Yogeshraj subject to conditions that he cannot tamper with evidence, must cooperate with trial proceedings, and cannot commit any further crimes.
Recommended
Sc order deshmukh plea
The Supreme Court of India dismissed special leave petitions filed by Anil Deshmukh challenging a Bombay High Court order directing a preliminary inquiry by an independent agency into allegations against Deshmukh, who was formerly the Home Minister of Maharashtra. The Court said the serious nature of the allegations required an independent inquiry and it was not persuaded by the arguments that an inquiry was not needed since Deshmukh had resigned.
Mp hc phc in prisons
The court considered an application for suspension of sentence from appellant Lalji Singh who was convicted of murder and other charges, and granted a further 90 day suspension of his sentence due to his heart ailment and the lack of proper medical facilities and transport in the jail. The court directed the state to improve primary healthcare in jails, including establishing on-site health centers, and to submit a report on current medical facilities, citing precedents requiring protection of prisoners' human rights.
Sc order uapa sep 9
The Supreme Court of India allowed an appeal challenging the judgment of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh. The appellants were arrested in connection with offenses under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act and sought bail after 90 days as no chargesheet was filed. The High Court had rejected bail, noting the extension granted to the investigation. However, the Supreme Court held that under its previous judgment, the Magistrate did not have jurisdiction to extend the investigation period for UAPA offenses. Therefore, the appellants were entitled to default bail as the investigation was not completed within the prescribed period. The Court directed the appellants be released on bail and for the trial to be concluded expeditiously.
July delhi hc order
1. Gulfisha Fatima filed a writ petition seeking a writ of habeas corpus to direct the State to produce her and release her from what she claims is illegal custody.
2. She was arrested in connection with multiple FIRs including charges under the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act. Her bail applications were dismissed except for one case where she was granted bail.
3. The court dismissed the writ petition stating that her detention was not illegal as she was in judicial custody pursuant to court orders and the remedy lies in appealing those orders, not through a writ of habeas corpus.
Gauhati hc 482 inherent juris for foreigner order
1) The petitioner, Md. Amir Khan, filed a petition seeking to quash the order that convicted him under the Foreigners Act for illegally residing in India.
2) The trial court had framed charges and the petitioner had pled guilty, receiving a two year prison sentence and fine.
3) The petitioner now claims he is not a foreigner but a citizen of Tripura, India based on birth and school documents. However, he did not provide these documents during the investigation or trial.
4) The high court dismissed the petition, finding no illegality in the trial court's order since the petitioner pled guilty without presenting any evidence and the documents are produced only after appealing the conviction.
27345 2021 34_3_33174_order_07-feb-2022
The Supreme Court of India heard a writ petition and related interlocutory applications. The Court had previously passed an order on January 10th, 2022 protecting the applicant from harassment. However, that order was not formally served on the Superintendent of Police. As a result, a notice was issued to the applicant requiring his attendance. The Court clarified that the applicant remains protected by the previous order and no further steps shall be taken pursuant to the notice. The Court directed the State of Tripura to communicate copies of both the present and previous orders to the Superintendent of Police to ensure compliance and prevent harassment of the applicant. The interlocutory applications were disposed of.
Sc order denying yogeshraj bail
1) The Supreme Court of India heard petitions related to the criminal case against individuals accused of lynching a police officer who was investigating cow slaughter.
2) One of the accused, Lokendra, was already in custody while another accused, Yogeshraj, had been released on bail.
3) The Court stayed the order granting bail to Yogeshraj and directed him to surrender within seven days, considering the serious nature of the case where a police officer was lynched under the pretext of investigating cow slaughter.
4) The Court sought a report from the trial court on how much time was needed to frame charges and record testimonies of independent witnesses, as charges had not yet been framed in
Allahabad hc order yogeshraj bail
Yogeshraj applied for bail in Case Crime No. 583 of 2018 under Section 124-A IPC at the Police Station of Syana, District Bulandshahar. His counsel argued he is entitled to bail on the grounds of parity since the co-accused Ashish Kumar was granted bail in an identical case. The prosecution opposed bail but did not dispute the claim of parity. The court granted bail to Yogeshraj subject to conditions that he cannot tamper with evidence, must cooperate with trial proceedings, and cannot commit any further crimes.
Sudha may 21 hc order
The petitioner, Maaysha Singh, filed a writ petition seeking bail for her mother, Sudha Bharadwaj, who was imprisoned. While the petitioner no longer pressed the request for bail on medical grounds, the court noted that prisoners have a right to their medical records under the constitution. The court ordered the prison authorities to provide all of Bharadwaj's medical records and test results upon request. The court also agreed that Bharadwaj should be allowed to make phone calls to approved family members after medical visits. The writ petition was then disposed of with these orders regarding access to medical information.
Nodeep kaur bail order
The petitioner, Naudeep Kaur, filed a petition seeking regular bail in an FIR registered against her and others for offenses related to rioting and assaulting police officers during a protest. [The court notes that] Two FIRs were registered for the same incident, and the petitioner was already granted bail in one case. While the prosecution claimed the protest turned violent, the petitioner argued she was peacefully protesting unpaid wages. Considering the petitioner has been in custody since January and the matter requires further investigation, the court granted her bail, but warned she must not violate any laws or create law and order issues.
Sadakat khan vs state
The document summarizes a court order from the High Court of Madhya Pradesh regarding an application for bail (M.Cr.C. No. 10029 of 2021) filed by Sadakat. The court order grants Sadakat temporary bail on parity with two other co-accused, Prakhar Vyas and Adwin Anthony, who were previously granted temporary bail in the same crime case (Crime No.02/2021 registered at Police Station Tukoganj, Indore). The court maintained that the applicant is entitled to temporary bail in light of the Supreme Court's order granting bail to the main accused Munawar Faruqui in the same crime case.
Gauhati hc order july 20
1) The petitioner challenged a Foreigners Tribunal order declaring her a foreigner.
2) The Court remanded the case back to the Foreigners Tribunal for reconsideration, noting communication issues with the petitioner's counsel resulted in her missing hearings.
3) The Court will allow the petitioner to appear before the Tribunal again to prove her citizenship, as this is an important right that should be decided on the merits rather than by default.
4) The impugned Foreigners Tribunal order declaring the petitioner a foreigner is set aside, and she must appear before the Tribunal within one month to prove she is an Indian citizen.
Bom hc nagpur july 29 order
The applicant challenged two orders - one extending his detention for 90 days under the UAPA and the other rejecting his application for default bail. The court analyzed whether the requirements for seeking extension of detention under the UAPA were satisfied. It found that the public prosecutor had submitted a detailed report outlining the progress of the investigation and reasons for seeking an extension. It also found that a joint application for the applicant and another accused was justified as the allegations against them were identical. Therefore, the mandatory requirements for extending detention under the UAPA were satisfied and the applicant was not entitled to default bail.
Holi bench sc order
This document is the record of proceedings from the Supreme Court of India regarding a petition for special leave to appeal an order rejecting anticipatory bail. The petitioner is accused of offenses including rape and had applied for anticipatory bail which was rejected by the lower courts. The Supreme Court reviewed documents in the case including the FIR and complainant's statement. The Court found that the petitioner had made a prima facie case for anticipatory bail based on WhatsApp chats between the petitioner and complainant brought before the Court. The Court then directed that if the petitioner is arrested, he shall be released on a personal bond of Rs. 10,000 and must cooperate with the investigation.
Ca phc apn_24_2014_2
This document is a court judgment from the Court of Appeal of Sri Lanka regarding an application seeking revision of a High Court order concerning the return of two children to Australia under the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction Act. The court addressed several preliminary objections raised by the father (1st respondent) regarding the mother's (petitioner) locus standi to file the revision application, whether she was guilty of laches, and other issues. The court overruled the objections, finding that the mother had a right to file as an aggrieved party, the two month delay was not unreasonable, and that there is no right to appeal such orders under the relevant Act.
Misher ali-judgment-24-mar-2021 (1)
The Supreme Court of India allowed the appeals of Md. Misher Ali against an order declaring him a foreigner. [The Court summarized that] the Foreigner's Tribunal and High Court orders were passed in violation of principles of natural justice as notice was not served at Ali's permanent residence, which was known to authorities. The Court set aside the orders and remanded the case back to the Foreigner's Tribunal to allow Ali an opportunity to respond consistent with principles of natural justice.
Jodhpur hc order july 28 parole
The convict petitioner Rakesh had served 14 years of life imprisonment and was granted parole for the first time. However, he was unable to furnish the required surety bonds due to poverty. The court noted the poor conditions of the petitioner. It directed legal and prison authorities to prepare a database of all convicts to better consider them for parole and reintegration. Considering the long imprisonment, the court granted the petitioner 40 days parole upon furnishing a personal bond and undertaking to return to prison after. It aimed to follow reformative punishment and uphold convicts' rights per the constitution.
Sc order 16-aug-2021
The Supreme Court of India granted leave in an appeal regarding the denial of anticipatory bail to an appellant. The court analyzed Section 170 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and previous court judgments on the interpretation of this section. The court agreed with the view that Section 170 does not impose an obligation on investigatory officers to arrest every accused when filing a chargesheet. The word "custody" in Section 170 refers to presenting the accused in court, not requiring police or judicial custody. If the accused has cooperated throughout the investigation and there is no reason to believe they will abscond, arrest is not necessary. Insisting on arrest as a prerequisite for accepting a chargesheet violates the intent of Section 170 and personal liberty. In this case
Delhi hc sma notice
The court is considering initiating contempt proceedings against a Sub-Divisional Magistrate (SDM) for violating a previous court order. The previous order directed that marriage officers should not send notices to applicants' residences when processing applications under the Special Marriages Act, as this could jeopardize marriage plans or endanger lives. However, the respondent SDM sent notices to the residence of an applicant, in violation of these directions. The court has issued a notice to the SDM to explain why contempt proceedings should not be initiated for obstructing justice and disobeying the court.
Gauhati hc
1) The petitioner had been declared a foreigner by a Foreigners Tribunal in Jorhat and has been in detention since May 2019, nearing completion of two years in detention.
2) In light of Supreme Court orders on releasing detainees who have completed two years to avoid COVID spread, the court directs the petitioner's release on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 5,000 and one surety of the same amount.
3) The court reiterates an earlier order directing authorities to release all detainees who have completed two years, on a personal bond and one surety to address the pandemic, while complying with other directions.
Nia v watali 2019 sc
The Supreme Court of India heard an appeal by the National Investigation Agency against a High Court order granting bail to Zahoor Ahmad Shah Watali, who was accused in a terrorism funding case. The trial court had rejected bail citing serious allegations against Watali, including acting as a conduit for funds to terrorists and separatists in Jammu and Kashmir. However, the High Court granted bail subject to conditions. In its judgment, the Supreme Court analyzed the evidence and allegations in detail and concluded that the offenses against Watali were prima facie established. It also noted that he received adequate medical care in jail. The Court allowed the appeal and canceled the bail granted by the High Court.
High court single bench judgment soman case - wpc no 21529 of 2012
1. The document is a court judgment regarding a writ petition filed by V.S. Achuthanandan, a former Chief Minister of Kerala, seeking to quash an FIR registered against him for alleged offenses of corruption and criminal misconduct.
2. The FIR was registered based on a vigilance inquiry ordered by the new government into the assignment of government land to a relative of Achuthanandan during his tenure as Chief Minister.
3. Achuthanandan contends that there was no illegality in the land assignment or subsequent decision to exempt the assignee from alienation restrictions. The government argues there is evidence of abuse of power and conspiracy to provide wrongful gain.
4.
40158 2019 32_1501_25867_judgement_01-feb-2021
The Supreme Court of India heard an appeal by the Union of India against a High Court order granting bail to the respondent, who was accused of conspiring in a terrorist attack. The prosecution argued the respondent played a major role in the attack and bail should not have been granted under anti-terrorism laws. The respondent argued prolonged detention without trial violated his rights. The Supreme Court analyzed when bail can be cancelled or granted, emphasizing discretion given to higher courts. It remanded the case back to the High Court to reconsider bail based on merits while following anti-terrorism laws.
Sc order freedom of rel act
The Supreme Court of India allowed the appeal of George Mangalapilly challenging his prosecution under Sections 153(B)(1), 295-A of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the M.P. Freedom of Religion Act. The key witness in the case, Dharmendar Dohar, denied in his testimony that he was forcibly converted and said the appellant did not contact him. Given that the prosecution's entire case rested on this witness, and his testimony did not support the charges, the Court quashed the proceedings against the appellant.
20190828 s corderaleemsyedkashmiristudent
The Supreme Court of India heard a writ petition filed by Mohammad Aleem Syed regarding travel to Jammu & Kashmir. The Court ordered that the petitioner be allowed to travel to Anantnag in Jammu & Kashmir to meet his parents, ensure their welfare, and then report back to the Court. The Court further directed the Senior Superintendent of Police, Security in Jammu & Kashmir to facilitate the petitioner's travel without hindrance and provide police protection if required. The petitioner must file an affidavit upon his return detailing the events of his visit.
20190828 s cordersitaramyechurikashmir
The Supreme Court of India heard a writ petition filed by Sitaram Yechury, General Secretary of the Communist Party of India (Marxist), seeking the production of Mohammad Yousuf Tarigami, a party member and former member of the Jammu & Kashmir Legislative Assembly. Yechury complained that he had been unable to meet or inquire about Tarigami's welfare due to being denied entry to Jammu & Kashmir. The Court permitted Yechury to travel to Jammu & Kashmir to meet Tarigami and inquire about his health and welfare, but for no other purpose. The Court directed the Senior Superintendent of Police in Jammu & Kashmir to facilitate Yechury's travel and help
Delhi riots bail feb 3
1. This document summarizes a bail application hearing for Kuldeep Singh, who is accused in an FIR for rioting and murder.
2. The defense argues that Kuldeep should be granted bail on the grounds that other co-accused have received bail and he has been in custody since March 2020. However, the prosecution argues that Kuldeep was identified by witnesses as part of the riotous mob that beat the victim to death.
3. The judge heard arguments from both sides and will review the case details and chargesheet before making a decision on whether to grant bail to Kuldeep Singh.
SC order about Muslim vendors dated - December 17, 2021.pdf
The Supreme Court of India was hearing two contempt petitions related to orders staying a High Court of Andhra Pradesh judgment and directing that no tenants or shop holders be excluded from participating in an auction or being granted leases for a shopping complex based on their religion. The Court disposed of the contempt petitions and clarified that the Supreme Court's order takes precedence over any High Court order. None of the tenants or shop holders are to be excluded from the auction or leases for the shopping complex based on their religion.
Sc order sept 30
The Supreme Court of India heard a writ petition filed by Yash Pal Singh, whose son was killed in an alleged encounter by police officers in 2002. The court noted that the case has been pending since then, and the police officers involved have not been properly investigated or prosecuted despite court orders. The court criticized the laxity of the state in defending its police officers. It directed the state of Uttar Pradesh to deposit Rs. 7 lakhs as interim costs to the petitioner, as he has been denied justice for 19 years. The matter was listed for further hearing on October 20th.
Victim right to appeal 14248 2020 35_1503_23651_order_28-aug-2020
The Supreme Court of India heard a criminal appeal filed by Parvinder Kansal against the State of NCT of Delhi. After hearing arguments from both sides, the Court granted leave to appeal but dismissed the criminal appeal based on a signed non-reportable order placed on the file.
More Related Content
What's hot
Sudha may 21 hc order
The petitioner, Maaysha Singh, filed a writ petition seeking bail for her mother, Sudha Bharadwaj, who was imprisoned. While the petitioner no longer pressed the request for bail on medical grounds, the court noted that prisoners have a right to their medical records under the constitution. The court ordered the prison authorities to provide all of Bharadwaj's medical records and test results upon request. The court also agreed that Bharadwaj should be allowed to make phone calls to approved family members after medical visits. The writ petition was then disposed of with these orders regarding access to medical information.
Nodeep kaur bail order
The petitioner, Naudeep Kaur, filed a petition seeking regular bail in an FIR registered against her and others for offenses related to rioting and assaulting police officers during a protest. [The court notes that] Two FIRs were registered for the same incident, and the petitioner was already granted bail in one case. While the prosecution claimed the protest turned violent, the petitioner argued she was peacefully protesting unpaid wages. Considering the petitioner has been in custody since January and the matter requires further investigation, the court granted her bail, but warned she must not violate any laws or create law and order issues.
Sadakat khan vs state
The document summarizes a court order from the High Court of Madhya Pradesh regarding an application for bail (M.Cr.C. No. 10029 of 2021) filed by Sadakat. The court order grants Sadakat temporary bail on parity with two other co-accused, Prakhar Vyas and Adwin Anthony, who were previously granted temporary bail in the same crime case (Crime No.02/2021 registered at Police Station Tukoganj, Indore). The court maintained that the applicant is entitled to temporary bail in light of the Supreme Court's order granting bail to the main accused Munawar Faruqui in the same crime case.
Gauhati hc order july 20
1) The petitioner challenged a Foreigners Tribunal order declaring her a foreigner.
2) The Court remanded the case back to the Foreigners Tribunal for reconsideration, noting communication issues with the petitioner's counsel resulted in her missing hearings.
3) The Court will allow the petitioner to appear before the Tribunal again to prove her citizenship, as this is an important right that should be decided on the merits rather than by default.
4) The impugned Foreigners Tribunal order declaring the petitioner a foreigner is set aside, and she must appear before the Tribunal within one month to prove she is an Indian citizen.
Bom hc nagpur july 29 order
The applicant challenged two orders - one extending his detention for 90 days under the UAPA and the other rejecting his application for default bail. The court analyzed whether the requirements for seeking extension of detention under the UAPA were satisfied. It found that the public prosecutor had submitted a detailed report outlining the progress of the investigation and reasons for seeking an extension. It also found that a joint application for the applicant and another accused was justified as the allegations against them were identical. Therefore, the mandatory requirements for extending detention under the UAPA were satisfied and the applicant was not entitled to default bail.
Holi bench sc order
This document is the record of proceedings from the Supreme Court of India regarding a petition for special leave to appeal an order rejecting anticipatory bail. The petitioner is accused of offenses including rape and had applied for anticipatory bail which was rejected by the lower courts. The Supreme Court reviewed documents in the case including the FIR and complainant's statement. The Court found that the petitioner had made a prima facie case for anticipatory bail based on WhatsApp chats between the petitioner and complainant brought before the Court. The Court then directed that if the petitioner is arrested, he shall be released on a personal bond of Rs. 10,000 and must cooperate with the investigation.
Ca phc apn_24_2014_2
This document is a court judgment from the Court of Appeal of Sri Lanka regarding an application seeking revision of a High Court order concerning the return of two children to Australia under the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction Act. The court addressed several preliminary objections raised by the father (1st respondent) regarding the mother's (petitioner) locus standi to file the revision application, whether she was guilty of laches, and other issues. The court overruled the objections, finding that the mother had a right to file as an aggrieved party, the two month delay was not unreasonable, and that there is no right to appeal such orders under the relevant Act.
Misher ali-judgment-24-mar-2021 (1)
The Supreme Court of India allowed the appeals of Md. Misher Ali against an order declaring him a foreigner. [The Court summarized that] the Foreigner's Tribunal and High Court orders were passed in violation of principles of natural justice as notice was not served at Ali's permanent residence, which was known to authorities. The Court set aside the orders and remanded the case back to the Foreigner's Tribunal to allow Ali an opportunity to respond consistent with principles of natural justice.
Jodhpur hc order july 28 parole
The convict petitioner Rakesh had served 14 years of life imprisonment and was granted parole for the first time. However, he was unable to furnish the required surety bonds due to poverty. The court noted the poor conditions of the petitioner. It directed legal and prison authorities to prepare a database of all convicts to better consider them for parole and reintegration. Considering the long imprisonment, the court granted the petitioner 40 days parole upon furnishing a personal bond and undertaking to return to prison after. It aimed to follow reformative punishment and uphold convicts' rights per the constitution.
Sc order 16-aug-2021
The Supreme Court of India granted leave in an appeal regarding the denial of anticipatory bail to an appellant. The court analyzed Section 170 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and previous court judgments on the interpretation of this section. The court agreed with the view that Section 170 does not impose an obligation on investigatory officers to arrest every accused when filing a chargesheet. The word "custody" in Section 170 refers to presenting the accused in court, not requiring police or judicial custody. If the accused has cooperated throughout the investigation and there is no reason to believe they will abscond, arrest is not necessary. Insisting on arrest as a prerequisite for accepting a chargesheet violates the intent of Section 170 and personal liberty. In this case
Delhi hc sma notice
The court is considering initiating contempt proceedings against a Sub-Divisional Magistrate (SDM) for violating a previous court order. The previous order directed that marriage officers should not send notices to applicants' residences when processing applications under the Special Marriages Act, as this could jeopardize marriage plans or endanger lives. However, the respondent SDM sent notices to the residence of an applicant, in violation of these directions. The court has issued a notice to the SDM to explain why contempt proceedings should not be initiated for obstructing justice and disobeying the court.
Gauhati hc
1) The petitioner had been declared a foreigner by a Foreigners Tribunal in Jorhat and has been in detention since May 2019, nearing completion of two years in detention.
2) In light of Supreme Court orders on releasing detainees who have completed two years to avoid COVID spread, the court directs the petitioner's release on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 5,000 and one surety of the same amount.
3) The court reiterates an earlier order directing authorities to release all detainees who have completed two years, on a personal bond and one surety to address the pandemic, while complying with other directions.
Nia v watali 2019 sc
The Supreme Court of India heard an appeal by the National Investigation Agency against a High Court order granting bail to Zahoor Ahmad Shah Watali, who was accused in a terrorism funding case. The trial court had rejected bail citing serious allegations against Watali, including acting as a conduit for funds to terrorists and separatists in Jammu and Kashmir. However, the High Court granted bail subject to conditions. In its judgment, the Supreme Court analyzed the evidence and allegations in detail and concluded that the offenses against Watali were prima facie established. It also noted that he received adequate medical care in jail. The Court allowed the appeal and canceled the bail granted by the High Court.
High court single bench judgment soman case - wpc no 21529 of 2012
1. The document is a court judgment regarding a writ petition filed by V.S. Achuthanandan, a former Chief Minister of Kerala, seeking to quash an FIR registered against him for alleged offenses of corruption and criminal misconduct.
2. The FIR was registered based on a vigilance inquiry ordered by the new government into the assignment of government land to a relative of Achuthanandan during his tenure as Chief Minister.
3. Achuthanandan contends that there was no illegality in the land assignment or subsequent decision to exempt the assignee from alienation restrictions. The government argues there is evidence of abuse of power and conspiracy to provide wrongful gain.
4.
40158 2019 32_1501_25867_judgement_01-feb-2021
The Supreme Court of India heard an appeal by the Union of India against a High Court order granting bail to the respondent, who was accused of conspiring in a terrorist attack. The prosecution argued the respondent played a major role in the attack and bail should not have been granted under anti-terrorism laws. The respondent argued prolonged detention without trial violated his rights. The Supreme Court analyzed when bail can be cancelled or granted, emphasizing discretion given to higher courts. It remanded the case back to the High Court to reconsider bail based on merits while following anti-terrorism laws.
Sc order freedom of rel act
The Supreme Court of India allowed the appeal of George Mangalapilly challenging his prosecution under Sections 153(B)(1), 295-A of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the M.P. Freedom of Religion Act. The key witness in the case, Dharmendar Dohar, denied in his testimony that he was forcibly converted and said the appellant did not contact him. Given that the prosecution's entire case rested on this witness, and his testimony did not support the charges, the Court quashed the proceedings against the appellant.
20190828 s corderaleemsyedkashmiristudent
The Supreme Court of India heard a writ petition filed by Mohammad Aleem Syed regarding travel to Jammu & Kashmir. The Court ordered that the petitioner be allowed to travel to Anantnag in Jammu & Kashmir to meet his parents, ensure their welfare, and then report back to the Court. The Court further directed the Senior Superintendent of Police, Security in Jammu & Kashmir to facilitate the petitioner's travel without hindrance and provide police protection if required. The petitioner must file an affidavit upon his return detailing the events of his visit.
20190828 s cordersitaramyechurikashmir
The Supreme Court of India heard a writ petition filed by Sitaram Yechury, General Secretary of the Communist Party of India (Marxist), seeking the production of Mohammad Yousuf Tarigami, a party member and former member of the Jammu & Kashmir Legislative Assembly. Yechury complained that he had been unable to meet or inquire about Tarigami's welfare due to being denied entry to Jammu & Kashmir. The Court permitted Yechury to travel to Jammu & Kashmir to meet Tarigami and inquire about his health and welfare, but for no other purpose. The Court directed the Senior Superintendent of Police in Jammu & Kashmir to facilitate Yechury's travel and help
Delhi riots bail feb 3
1. This document summarizes a bail application hearing for Kuldeep Singh, who is accused in an FIR for rioting and murder.
2. The defense argues that Kuldeep should be granted bail on the grounds that other co-accused have received bail and he has been in custody since March 2020. However, the prosecution argues that Kuldeep was identified by witnesses as part of the riotous mob that beat the victim to death.
3. The judge heard arguments from both sides and will review the case details and chargesheet before making a decision on whether to grant bail to Kuldeep Singh.
SC order about Muslim vendors dated - December 17, 2021.pdf
The Supreme Court of India was hearing two contempt petitions related to orders staying a High Court of Andhra Pradesh judgment and directing that no tenants or shop holders be excluded from participating in an auction or being granted leases for a shopping complex based on their religion. The Court disposed of the contempt petitions and clarified that the Supreme Court's order takes precedence over any High Court order. None of the tenants or shop holders are to be excluded from the auction or leases for the shopping complex based on their religion.
What's hot (20)
High court single bench judgment soman case - wpc no 21529 of 2012
High court single bench judgment soman case - wpc no 21529 of 2012
SC order about Muslim vendors dated - December 17, 2021.pdf
SC order about Muslim vendors dated - December 17, 2021.pdf
Similar to Virendra vs state of up
Sc order sept 30
The Supreme Court of India heard a writ petition filed by Yash Pal Singh, whose son was killed in an alleged encounter by police officers in 2002. The court noted that the case has been pending since then, and the police officers involved have not been properly investigated or prosecuted despite court orders. The court criticized the laxity of the state in defending its police officers. It directed the state of Uttar Pradesh to deposit Rs. 7 lakhs as interim costs to the petitioner, as he has been denied justice for 19 years. The matter was listed for further hearing on October 20th.
Victim right to appeal 14248 2020 35_1503_23651_order_28-aug-2020
The Supreme Court of India heard a criminal appeal filed by Parvinder Kansal against the State of NCT of Delhi. After hearing arguments from both sides, the Court granted leave to appeal but dismissed the criminal appeal based on a signed non-reportable order placed on the file.
Sc order right to be represented 18 dec
The Supreme Court of India set aside the judgment of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad that had affirmed the appellant's conviction. The Supreme Court found that the High Court disposed of the appellant's appeal in his absence and without legal representation, which violated his right to due process under the Indian Constitution. The case was restored to the High Court to be reheard, with directions that the appellant receive legal representation and for the matter to be heard expeditiously.
anti conversion law petition SC_Order_02-Jan-2023.pdf
This document is the record of proceedings from the Supreme Court of India regarding two writ petitions. It summarizes that in Writ Petition 405/2020, the counsel for the petitioners sought to withdraw the petition in order to file a fresh petition challenging the validity of legislation that replaced an Ordinance. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn. In Writ Petition 428/2020, the petition was listed to be heard on January 16, 2023.
Embed-6 (1).pdfc p;p;kdk[odk[drskpokpopo
लाइव लॉ ने न्यायमूर्ति गवई के हवाले से यह भी कहा, “राज्य (मध्य प्रदेश) ऐसे मामले में एक अतिरिक्त महाधिवक्ता को पेश करने में क्यों दिलचस्पी ले रहा है?” वह भी कैविएट पर?! जाहिर है, यह उत्पीड़न का मामला लगता है! किसी को उसे (याचिकाकर्ता को) परेशान करने में दिलचस्पी है!
Delhi hc shifa ur rehman judgment may 7
This document is a court judgment regarding a petition filed by Shifa-ur-Rehman, President of the Alumni Association of Jamia Milia Islamia, who was arrested in connection with an FIR related to the 2020 Delhi riots. The petition challenges an order extending the period of investigation and the petitioner's detention. The court heard arguments from both sides on issues such as whether the petitioner was denied the right to consult his lawyer and whether the reasons provided for extension were sufficient. The court considered the matter in light of relevant sections of the UAPA and precedents.
Sc sudarshan news order 23-sep-2020
This document is the record of proceedings from the Supreme Court of India regarding a writ petition filed by Firoz Iqbal Khan against the Union of India and others. It summarizes the hearing held on September 23, 2020. During the hearing, the Solicitor General requested deferring the hearing to allow the central government time to issue a notice to Sudarshan News and take action. The court agreed to defer the hearing to October 5, 2020 and ordered the notice's proceedings and any actions to be subject to the outcome of this case. The interim order from September 15, 2020 will remain in effect until further orders.
1158_2022_1_11_40959_Order_13-Jan-2023.pdf
1. The contempt petition alleges that there has been no progress in the investigation of an FIR registered 5 months after a hate speech incident on December 19, 2021, despite 8 months having passed.
2. The Additional Solicitor General submits there is no contempt of the Supreme Court's directions.
3. The court directs the Investigating Officer to submit an affidavit within 2 weeks detailing the steps taken in the investigation since the December 2021 incident.
4. The contempt petition will be heard again on January 30, 2023.
SC Interim Bail to Teesta Setalvad_Order_02-Sep-2022 (1).pdf
The Supreme Court of India granted interim bail to Teesta Setalvad who had been in judicial custody since June 2022 regarding charges related to fabricating evidence in the 2002 Gujarat riots cases. While not examining the merits of the case, the Court noted that Setalvad had been in custody for over 2 months, essential investigation was complete, and the offenses dated back to 2002. It directed that she be released on interim bail on furnishing a cash bond or surety until the High Court considers her regular bail application. The Court clarified this should not be seen as a reflection on the case merits.
SC Interim Bail to Teesta Setalvad_Order_02-Sep-2022.pdf
The Supreme Court of India granted interim bail to Teesta Setalvad, who had been in judicial custody since June 2022 regarding charges related to fabrication of evidence in a 2002 riot case. While not assessing the merits of the case, the Court noted that essential investigation was complete, her custody was not needed during the pending High Court proceedings, and interim bail was justified given she had been in custody for over 2 months as a female accused. However, conditions were imposed including surrendering her passport until the High Court considers the matter.
26252_2022_1_27_38090_Order_09-Sep-2022 (1).pdf
The Supreme Court of India granted bail to Sidhique Kappan, who had been held in custody since October 2020 related to charges under the UAPA and IT Act. While the Court refrained from commenting on the investigation, it directed that Kappan be released on bail subject to conditions like residing in Delhi and reporting to police, citing the lengthy custody undergone. The Court also stipulated conditions for Kappan's release on bail and participation in legal proceedings.
Siddique Kappan bail.pdf
The Supreme Court of India granted bail to Sidhique Kappan, who had been held in custody since October 2020 related to charges under the UAPA and IT Act. While the Court refrained from commenting on the investigation, it directed that Kappan be released on bail subject to conditions like residing in Delhi and reporting to police weekly. The Court also stipulated he attend trial proceedings and not contact anyone related to the case.
Pravat mohanty sc judgment
This document summarizes a Supreme Court of India case involving two appellants, Pravat Chandra Mohanty and Pratap Kumar Choudhury, who were convicted of assaulting and causing the death of Kasinath Naik. The Supreme Court heard arguments from counsel for the appellants, the state of Odisha, and the legal representatives of the deceased. The appellants deposited compensation in court and all parties agreed to compound the offense of conviction under Section 324 IPC. The Supreme Court considered converting the Section 324 conviction to Section 323 or substituting imprisonment with a fine, given the appellants' advanced age.
Urgent whistleblower information as filed 14.05.18
This document provides information about pending whistleblower applications in an ongoing judicial matter. It notes that the whistleblower/applicant has 10 pending applications in the case that have yet to be decided, dating back to 2011. These applications include requests for records, to add parties to the case, and to present evidence. The document calls for the applications to be decided in sequential order so that the whistleblower can properly present evidence in the matter involving alleged criminal conspiracy. It also discusses how a pending probate case could impact the whistleblower's ability to prosecute the case depending on the determination of his locus standi or legal standing.
Urgent whistleblower information 14.05.18
This document is an urgent whistleblower application filed in an Indian court. It seeks to bring important information on record related to the administration of justice in judicial institutions. It references several pending applications filed by the whistleblower dating back to 2011 that remain undecided. These applications contain evidence of criminal conspiracy and involvement of public servants and judicial officers that the whistleblower seeks to present. The document requests that if the whistleblower's locus standi (standing) is questioned, the pending probate case determining this issue must be decided first before the applications can be heard. It urges the court to decide the various pending applications in sequence to allow the whistleblower to present pre-charge evidence in the matter.
Aquil husaain order
This document is a court judgement regarding a writ petition seeking a writ of habeas corpus for the production of Gulfisha Fatima, who had been arrested. The key details are:
1) Gulfisha Fatima was arrested on April 9, 2020 in connection with two FIRs - one for various IPC offenses and the other for offenses under the UAPA.
2) She was granted bail in the first FIR but remained in custody due to the second FIR.
3) The petition argued her continued detention was illegal as special courts empowered to extend remand in UAPA cases had not been sitting due to the COVID-19 lockdown.
4) However, the court notes she has been
order13-jan-2023.pdf
The Supreme Court of India heard a writ petition filed by Karuna Shankar against the State of Uttar Pradesh regarding her application for premature release that had been pending for over 3 years without justification. The Court directed the Director General of Prisons to ensure Shankar's application is considered and disposed of within a month and to file an affidavit of compliance. It warned of coercive action if further instances of authorities delaying such applications are found.
Sharad Zaveri vs UOI.pdf
The Supreme Court of India heard a writ petition filed by followers of the Tapagacch denomination of Shwetamber Murtipujak Jains seeking directions related to the Places of Worship Act and access to religious sites. The Court observed that the dispute was between two segments of the same denomination. It determined that the nature of the claimed rights and any alleged infractions could only be properly established through evidence in a civil suit, not merely based on affidavits in the writ petition. As sufficient civil remedies were available, the Court declined to entertain the petition under Article 32 and instead granted the petitioners liberty to pursue civil remedies as provided under law.
Sc _rajasthan_hc_stay_order
The Supreme Court of India heard a special leave petition filed by the High Court of Rajasthan against the State of Rajasthan. The Court issued a notice to the respondents and granted an interim stay of directions in paragraphs 15 and 16 of an order dated March 31, 2020 in a related criminal miscellaneous bail application case. The hearing was conducted through video conferencing due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Delhi hc nov 12 bail to ddelhi riots accused order
1. The petitioner filed a petition seeking regular bail in a case where he was charged with offenses under Sections 147/148/149/436/380 IPC.
2. It was noted that the petitioner has weak eyesight (-3.75) and was not wearing glasses in the CCTV footage, unlike when he was arrested. Given his weak vision, it could not be believed that he would have clear vision at night without glasses.
3. Considering the facts and that the petitioner has been in judicial custody since April 11, 2020, the court granted the petitioner bail on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 15,000 with one surety of the same amount.
Similar to Virendra vs state of up (20)
Victim right to appeal 14248 2020 35_1503_23651_order_28-aug-2020
Victim right to appeal 14248 2020 35_1503_23651_order_28-aug-2020
anti conversion law petition SC_Order_02-Jan-2023.pdf
anti conversion law petition SC_Order_02-Jan-2023.pdf
SC Interim Bail to Teesta Setalvad_Order_02-Sep-2022 (1).pdf
SC Interim Bail to Teesta Setalvad_Order_02-Sep-2022 (1).pdf
SC Interim Bail to Teesta Setalvad_Order_02-Sep-2022.pdf
SC Interim Bail to Teesta Setalvad_Order_02-Sep-2022.pdf
Urgent whistleblower information as filed 14.05.18
Urgent whistleblower information as filed 14.05.18
Delhi hc nov 12 bail to ddelhi riots accused order
Delhi hc nov 12 bail to ddelhi riots accused order
More from ZahidManiyar
Letter to-dgp-18 oct21
1. The families of prisoners held in Taloja Central Prison and Byculla Women's Prison wrote a letter regarding the discontinuation of weekly telephone interviews for family members when physical visits resume.
2. They expressed concern that discontinuing phone calls would cause problems for out-of-town family members who cannot easily travel to Mumbai for physical visits, as well as economically weak and elderly relatives.
3. The letter requested that phone interviews be allowed to continue in a hybrid model, where Mumbai-based relatives could choose a physical or phone visit, to ensure prisoners' right to communicate with family and advocates as guaranteed by the Indian Constitution.
Tripura hc order
The High Court of Tripura issued an order directing the State of Tripura Aids Control Society to be impleaded as a respondent. The State and Union of India were directed to issue guidelines to conduct a thorough research of all persons in State prisons to ascertain if any are infected with HIV. If any infected persons are found, necessary action must be taken for their treatment and care in accordance with law to prevent an epidemic. A report on the matter must be submitted to the court by November 9, 2021. The court also requested an Amicus Curiae to assist and oversee the matter.
Report vigilantism and attack on the freedom of religion in meerut
This document summarizes an incident of communal violence and vigilantism in Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, India. It discusses the history of communal tensions and riots in Meerut dating back to the 1930s. On September 20, 2017, two members of the Jehovah's Witnesses religious group were invited into a Hindu man's home but then detained against their will for over an hour, assaulted, and handed over to the police with false allegations of forced conversion efforts. The police refused to register a complaint about the assault and illegally detained the victims overnight without medical treatment. The document analyzes this incident as an example of the shift in India to smaller scale vigilantism targeting religious minorities, with the tacit support
Christians under attack_in_india_report
The document provides a summary of attacks on Christians in India, including two specific incidents in Roorkee and Mau, Uttar Pradesh:
1) In Roorkee, a mob of 250-300 people attacked a church, injuring several attendees. Police did not provide security despite prior complaints.
2) In Mau, a mob accused Christians of conversion during a prayer meeting. Seven people including the pastor were arrested under anti-conversion laws.
It also lists other incidents of threats, violence and false accusations against Christians in various parts of Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh and other states, indicating growing targeted attacks against the Christian minority in India.
Sharjeel imam vs state
The document discusses an application for bail filed by Sharjeel Imam. It summarizes the key details of the case, including the charges against Imam related to speeches he delivered on December 13th and 15th, 2019 regarding protests against the Citizenship Amendment Act. While the prosecution argues Imam's speeches incited violence, the judge found the evidence linking Imam's speeches to subsequent acts of violence by co-accused to be scanty and inconclusive. The judge granted Imam bail for offenses related to inciting violence but will further examine charges of sedition against Imam.
Sharjeel imam vs state
The document discusses a bail application hearing for Sharjeel Imam. It summarizes the key details of the case, including the charges against Imam related to speeches he delivered on December 13th and 15th, 2019 regarding protests against the Citizenship Amendment Act. It notes that while the prosecution argues Imam's speeches incited violence, the defense argues there is no evidence linking Imam's words to any criminal acts. In its ruling, the court finds the evidence against Imam for abetting offenses to be insufficient and scanty.
Ramesh kumar order
This document summarizes a court case revision petition hearing. The judge stayed the operation of the previous court order from October 12, 2021 until the next hearing date of November 12, 2021. The revision petition notice was ordered to be issued to the respondents. The trial court record was reviewed and the special public prosecutor and police inspector were present to provide submissions.
Cmm order
This document is a court order from a case involving multiple accused persons. It summarizes proceedings from a hearing where the prosecution requested more time for further investigation into the case. The court allowed more time but imposed a cost of Rs. 25,000 to be split among the accused, noting delays in the investigation. It also ordered the Secretary of Home Affairs to inquire about responsibility for the costs being imposed and deducting the amount from the responsible officer's salary. The case was adjourned to a future date for further proceedings.
Archbishop --press-statement
The Archbishop of Bangalore expresses concern over the Karnataka government's plan to survey Christian missionaries and places of worship. He argues that such surveys could unfairly target and endanger the Christian community. The Archbishop questions why only Christians are being surveyed, noting that Christians constitute a small percentage of the population. He calls on the government to respect constitutional protections of religious freedom and consider the educational and social services provided by Christian institutions instead of pursuing anti-conversion policies.
For website 211014 cjp-ncm complaint over muslim family in indore chairperson...
The complaint alleges that a Muslim family in Indore, Madhya Pradesh was attacked by a mob of 150 people associated with the RSS on October 9, 2021. The family was threatened and told to leave the village. Family members sustained head injuries and their house was ransacked. The police delayed registering an FIR and instead filed a counter-complaint against the family. The complaint cites other recent incidents of violence and harassment against Muslims in Indore and calls on the National Commission for Minorities to investigate and take action to prevent further attacks.
For website 211013 cjp ncm complaint over nun attacks to vice chairman (1)
The complaint alleges that on October 10, 2021 in Mau, Uttar Pradesh, two incidents occurred where Christian religious gatherings were disrupted by Hindu nationalist mobs. In one incident, two nuns were attacked, dragged to the police station and detained for hours on baseless allegations of religious conversion. In another incident, a Christian prayer service was raided and the pastor and congregants were taken to the police station. The complaint urges the National Commission for Minorities to investigate these attacks, ensure protection for religious minorities, condemn the attacks and pressure authorities to take swift action. It notes a pattern of increasing attacks on Christians in India by Hindu nationalist groups.
For website 21103 cjp ncm complaint over nun attacks to chairperson (1)
1. Citizens for Justice and Peace wrote to the National Commission for Minorities regarding two attacks on Christians in Mau, Uttar Pradesh on October 10, 2021. In the first incident, a mob attacked two nuns and their driver at a bus stand and took them to the police station. In the second incident, a mob disrupted a Christian prayer service and took the pastor and worshippers to the police station.
2. The letter requests that the Commission conduct an inquiry into the attacks, ensure protection for religious minorities, condemn the attacks and urge police to take action, and issue guidelines for dealing with communally motivated attacks. It argues that such attacks violate constitutional rights and aim to subjugate minority communities through fear.
Aiufwp eia response (1) converted
The document is a response letter from the All India Union of Forest Working People (AIUFWP) regarding the draft EIA Notification 2020. The key points made in the letter are:
1) The AIUFWP demands a complete withdrawal of the draft EIA Notification 2020 as it weakens environmental protections and public participation in decision making.
2) The draft was released during a national lockdown without proper accessibility or consideration of forest communities who will be most impacted.
3) Weakening environmental regulations could exacerbate future pandemics by further damaging nature.
4) The draft favors industries and projects over environmental protection by reducing scrutiny and exempting many from public hearings and consent requirements.
Maulana fazlul order
The applicant Maulana Fazlul Karim Qasimi was arrested in August 2021 for a Facebook post expressing the view that the Taliban in Afghanistan are not terrorists. The applicant's lawyer argued that the court had granted bail to someone in a similar case for expressing such an opinion. While reviewing the case diary, the court found nothing incriminating against the applicant beyond the Facebook post. Given the lack of other evidence, the court doubted if the post alone constituted a cognizable offense. Therefore, the court directed that the applicant be released on bail on furnishing a bond, finding further custody unnecessary in this case.
Maqbool alam order
The document is a 3-page court order from the Gauhati High Court regarding a bail application filed by Maqbool Alam, who was charged with several offenses including praising a terrorist organization on Facebook. The court heard arguments from Alam's lawyer and the public prosecutor. Upon reviewing the Facebook posts and finding that they did not require further custodial interrogation, the court granted bail to Alam subject to furnishing a bond and ensuring he does not interfere with the investigation.
Kerala hc order d rajagopal-v-ayyappan-anr-402210
This document summarizes two criminal revision petitions filed in the High Court of Kerala against judgments from lower courts. The lower courts had found police officers guilty of assaulting a complainant while he was in custody. The police officers argue on appeal that the lower courts erred in not requiring sanction from the state government before prosecuting public servants. The High Court examines the evidence and finds that the injuries occurred while the complainant was in police custody, supporting his allegation that police assaulted him at the police station lockup. Medical evidence also supports the complainant's version of events. The High Court dismisses the criminal revision petitions filed by the police officers.
Kpss security of kp's - 05.10.2021
The Kashmiri Pandit Sangarash Samiti (KPSS) wrote a letter to the Lieutenant Governor of Jammu and Kashmir regarding the security of non-migrant Kashmiri Pandits and Hindus living in the Kashmir Valley. KPSS has submitted communications over the past year requesting a meeting about this issue, but their requests have been ignored. Over the past 10 days, intelligence reports indicate prominent Kashmiri Pandit/Hindu businessmen will be targeted, and one was killed on October 5th. KPSS warns that if another Pandit/Hindu is killed due to administrative and security failures, they will file a petition with the International Human Rights Commission and launch a signature campaign against the administration for neglect
Lakhimpur kheri press statement from ct_us_06102021
The Central Trade Unions strongly condemned the killing of farmers protesting in Lakhimpur Kheri, Uttar Pradesh. They demanded the resignation of the Minister of State for Home and stringent punishment for the culprits. The trade unions also condemned the police for preventing opposition leaders and union leaders from visiting the families of the deceased. They reiterated their support for farmers in their struggle against the farm laws.
Allahabad hc wpil(a) 1585 2021
This document summarizes a court order from a Public Interest Litigation case in the State of Uttar Pradesh, India. The order lists several related cases to be heard together on October 22nd. It notes that two specific cases were not listed as directed in a previous order and threatens action against the responsible registry officer. It also directs the respondents to provide the petitioner's counsel a copy of the counter affidavit filed in connected writ petitions.
Mp hc wp 9320 2021_order_30-sep-2021
The document discusses two writ petitions related to prison overcrowding and conditions in Madhya Pradesh. It summarizes the suggestions provided by an amicus curiae to improve prison conditions, which include establishing women's prisons, borstal schools for youth offenders, mental health services, vocational training programs, healthcare facilities, sanitation infrastructure, educational opportunities, and recreational activities for inmates. The court acknowledges the urgent need for prison reforms and decongesting the prisons in the state.
More from ZahidManiyar (20)
Report vigilantism and attack on the freedom of religion in meerut
Report vigilantism and attack on the freedom of religion in meerut
For website 211014 cjp-ncm complaint over muslim family in indore chairperson...
For website 211014 cjp-ncm complaint over muslim family in indore chairperson...
For website 211013 cjp ncm complaint over nun attacks to vice chairman (1)
For website 211013 cjp ncm complaint over nun attacks to vice chairman (1)
For website 21103 cjp ncm complaint over nun attacks to chairperson (1)
For website 21103 cjp ncm complaint over nun attacks to chairperson (1)
Lakhimpur kheri press statement from ct_us_06102021
Lakhimpur kheri press statement from ct_us_06102021
Recently uploaded
Acolyte Episodes review (TV series)..pdf
Acolyte Episodes review (TV series) The Acolyte. Learn about the influence of the program on the Star Wars world, as well as new characters and story twists.
Gabriel Whitley's Motion Summary Judgment
Here is Gabe Whitley's response to my defamation lawsuit for him calling me a rapist and perjurer in court documents.
You have to read it to believe it, but after you read it, you won't believe it. And I included eight examples of defamatory statements/
EED - The Container Port PERFORMANCE INDEX 2023
El Puerto de Algeciras continúa un año más como el más eficiente del continente europeo y vuelve a situarse en el “top ten” mundial, según el informe The Container Port Performance Index 2023 (CPPI), elaborado por el Banco Mundial y la consultora S&P Global.
El informe CPPI utiliza dos enfoques metodológicos diferentes para calcular la clasificación del índice: uno administrativo o técnico y otro estadístico, basado en análisis factorial (FA). Según los autores, esta dualidad pretende asegurar una clasificación que refleje con precisión el rendimiento real del puerto, a la vez que sea estadísticamente sólida. En esta edición del informe CPPI 2023, se han empleado los mismos enfoques metodológicos y se ha aplicado un método de agregación de clasificaciones para combinar los resultados de ambos enfoques y obtener una clasificación agregada.
04062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss. For real time update Visit our social media handle. Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace. Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
Essential Tools for Modern PR Business .pptx
Discover the essential tools and strategies for modern PR business success. Learn how to craft compelling news releases, leverage press release sites and news wires, stay updated with PR news, and integrate effective PR practices to enhance your brand's visibility and credibility. Elevate your PR efforts with our comprehensive guide.
Letter-from-ECI-to-MeiTY-21st-march-2024.pdf
भारत सरकार द्वारा बड़े पैमाने पर व्हाट्सएप अभियान चलाए जाने से डेटा गोपनीयता, नैतिकता और चुनावों की निष्पक्षता पर सवाल उठते हैं।
What Ukraine Has Lost During Russia’s Invasion
An astonishing, first-of-its-kind, report by the NYT assessing damage in Ukraine. Even if the war ends tomorrow, in many places there will be nothing to go back to.
Recently uploaded (10)
Virendra vs state of up
- 1. ITEM NO.27 Court 6 (Video Conferencing) SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Writ Petition(s)(Criminal) No(s). 343/2020 VIRENDRA Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR. Respondent(s) (FOR IA No.113285/2020-GRANT OF BAIL and IA No.113286/2020- EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ) Date : 18-11-2020 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH For Petitioner(s) Mr. Z U Khan, Adv. Mr. Sulaiman Mohd Khan, Adv. Mrs. Taiba Khan, Adv. Mr. Ashish Choudhury, Adv. Mr. Rohit Amit Sthalekar, AOR For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The petitioner has, under Article 32 of the Constitution, prayed for a direction for expeditious disposal of criminal appeal (No. 3563/2004) pending in the High Court. It is submitted that the petitioner is in jail for last 21 years without remission. From the facts which have been brought on record, it appears that the application for suspension of the sentence and grant of bail was heard by the High Court on 30.01.2013 and disposed of for want of prosecution. The criminal appeal was filed by the petitioner in 2004 and the High Court on 19.07.2004 directed the bail application be heard 1 Digitally signed by MEENAKSHI KOHLI Date: 2020.11.18 16:22:55 IST Reason: Signature Not Verified
- 2. after receipt of the record. It appears that the bail remained pending from 2004 to 2013 and was disposed of for want of prosecution. Thereafter, several dates were fixed for hearing of the appeal but could not be heard till date. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner, being in jail for 21 years, should be released on bail . We are of the view that in the facts of the present case, ends of justice be served in giving the liberty to the petitioner to make a fresh application for suspension of sentence and grant of bail before the High Court in the pending criminal appeal. We observe that in event the bail application is filed, the same shall be considered forthwith by the High Court. The criminal appeal being pending in the High Court, we are not inclined to entertain this petition under Article 32 of the Constitution. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed with aforesaid liberty. We expect that from the date, the bail application is filed, the same shall be decided at an early date preferably within a period of one month. Pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (MEENAKSHI KOHLI) (RENU KAPOOR) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS COURT MASTER 2