Allahabad hc order yogeshraj bail
•
0 likes•148 views
Yogeshraj applied for bail in Case Crime No. 583 of 2018 under Section 124-A IPC at the Police Station of Syana, District Bulandshahar. His counsel argued he is entitled to bail on the grounds of parity since the co-accused Ashish Kumar was granted bail in an identical case. The prosecution opposed bail but did not dispute the claim of parity. The court granted bail to Yogeshraj subject to conditions that he cannot tamper with evidence, must cooperate with trial proceedings, and cannot commit any further crimes.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Download to read offline
Recommended
Sc order denying yogeshraj bail
1) The Supreme Court of India heard petitions related to the criminal case against individuals accused of lynching a police officer who was investigating cow slaughter.
2) One of the accused, Lokendra, was already in custody while another accused, Yogeshraj, had been released on bail.
3) The Court stayed the order granting bail to Yogeshraj and directed him to surrender within seven days, considering the serious nature of the case where a police officer was lynched under the pretext of investigating cow slaughter.
4) The Court sought a report from the trial court on how much time was needed to frame charges and record testimonies of independent witnesses, as charges had not yet been framed in
Allahabad hc order ashish kumar bail
The applicant, Ashish Kumar, applied for bail in a case under Section 124-A IPC regarding criminal charges. He had previously been granted bail for other offenses related to the same incident. The prosecution opposed bail, arguing he may interfere with evidence or commit other crimes. Considering Article 21 of the Indian Constitution regarding personal liberty, the court granted bail with conditions, including that the applicant not tamper with evidence, cooperate with trial, and avoid further criminal acts or the bail will be cancelled.
13.12.2021 res judicata applicable in ft
The petitioner challenged a second proceeding initiated against her by the Foreigners Tribunal declaring her a foreigner, despite an earlier tribunal opinion finding she was not a foreigner. The court allows the petition, setting aside the second opinion as violating the Supreme Court ruling that the principle of res judicata applies to Foreigners Tribunal proceedings. As the petitioner's identity was the same in both proceedings and the tribunal made no finding she was different than the earlier proceedee, the second proceeding against the same person cannot be sustained. The petitioner must be released if detained under the second, now set aside, opinion.
Delh hc rakesh kumar v. vijayanta arya
The court found R-3, a police officer, guilty of contempt of court for arresting the petitioner without following proper legal procedures as outlined in a previous Supreme Court case. Specifically, R-3 failed to serve the required notice under section 41A of the Cr.P.C. before arresting the petitioner. While R-3 apologized, the court did not accept the apology as it was not sincere and was only offered as a last resort. As a result, the court sentenced R-3 to one day in simple imprisonment, a fine of Rs. 2,000, and costs of Rs. 15,000 to be paid to the petitioner. However, the sentence will be kept in abeyance for two
Maulana fazlul order
The applicant Maulana Fazlul Karim Qasimi was arrested in August 2021 for a Facebook post expressing the view that the Taliban in Afghanistan are not terrorists. The applicant's lawyer argued that the court had granted bail to someone in a similar case for expressing such an opinion. While reviewing the case diary, the court found nothing incriminating against the applicant beyond the Facebook post. Given the lack of other evidence, the court doubted if the post alone constituted a cognizable offense. Therefore, the court directed that the applicant be released on bail on furnishing a bond, finding further custody unnecessary in this case.
Allahabad hc may 20 order
The court heard a bail application where the prosecution was not able to present full facts due to lack of instructions from police. The court directed police to explain. Police confirmed instructions now available and enquiry ordered into failure to provide earlier. The court discussed prior case law on timely bail hearings and directed the DGP to create a transparent procedure for police to provide timely instructions to prosecutors for bail hearings across UP within 8 weeks.
Bom hc prisoners order apr 22
The High Court of Bombay heard a suo moto petition regarding under-trial prisoners in Maharashtra correctional homes. The Court directed the State to provide crime rate data after a recent lockdown order and to consider suggestions from an intervenor group on prisoner transfers. The State was given time to respond and submit a plan to decongest overcrowded prisons by shifting prisoners based on valid reasons, with any applications to be decided within 48 hours. The matter was adjourned to a future date for the State's responses.
Gauhati hc sep 9 order
The document is an order from the Gauhati High Court regarding a writ petition filed by Asor Uddin challenging a ex-parte order from the Foreigners' Tribunal declaring him to be a foreigner. The High Court allowed the petition, set aside the ex-parte order, and remanded the matter back to the Foreigners' Tribunal for fresh proceedings. However, the petitioner was ordered to remain on bail, appear before the Superintendent of Police, and the Foreigners' Tribunal by certain dates or the ex-parte order would be revived.
Recommended
Sc order denying yogeshraj bail
1) The Supreme Court of India heard petitions related to the criminal case against individuals accused of lynching a police officer who was investigating cow slaughter.
2) One of the accused, Lokendra, was already in custody while another accused, Yogeshraj, had been released on bail.
3) The Court stayed the order granting bail to Yogeshraj and directed him to surrender within seven days, considering the serious nature of the case where a police officer was lynched under the pretext of investigating cow slaughter.
4) The Court sought a report from the trial court on how much time was needed to frame charges and record testimonies of independent witnesses, as charges had not yet been framed in
Allahabad hc order ashish kumar bail
The applicant, Ashish Kumar, applied for bail in a case under Section 124-A IPC regarding criminal charges. He had previously been granted bail for other offenses related to the same incident. The prosecution opposed bail, arguing he may interfere with evidence or commit other crimes. Considering Article 21 of the Indian Constitution regarding personal liberty, the court granted bail with conditions, including that the applicant not tamper with evidence, cooperate with trial, and avoid further criminal acts or the bail will be cancelled.
13.12.2021 res judicata applicable in ft
The petitioner challenged a second proceeding initiated against her by the Foreigners Tribunal declaring her a foreigner, despite an earlier tribunal opinion finding she was not a foreigner. The court allows the petition, setting aside the second opinion as violating the Supreme Court ruling that the principle of res judicata applies to Foreigners Tribunal proceedings. As the petitioner's identity was the same in both proceedings and the tribunal made no finding she was different than the earlier proceedee, the second proceeding against the same person cannot be sustained. The petitioner must be released if detained under the second, now set aside, opinion.
Delh hc rakesh kumar v. vijayanta arya
The court found R-3, a police officer, guilty of contempt of court for arresting the petitioner without following proper legal procedures as outlined in a previous Supreme Court case. Specifically, R-3 failed to serve the required notice under section 41A of the Cr.P.C. before arresting the petitioner. While R-3 apologized, the court did not accept the apology as it was not sincere and was only offered as a last resort. As a result, the court sentenced R-3 to one day in simple imprisonment, a fine of Rs. 2,000, and costs of Rs. 15,000 to be paid to the petitioner. However, the sentence will be kept in abeyance for two
Maulana fazlul order
The applicant Maulana Fazlul Karim Qasimi was arrested in August 2021 for a Facebook post expressing the view that the Taliban in Afghanistan are not terrorists. The applicant's lawyer argued that the court had granted bail to someone in a similar case for expressing such an opinion. While reviewing the case diary, the court found nothing incriminating against the applicant beyond the Facebook post. Given the lack of other evidence, the court doubted if the post alone constituted a cognizable offense. Therefore, the court directed that the applicant be released on bail on furnishing a bond, finding further custody unnecessary in this case.
Allahabad hc may 20 order
The court heard a bail application where the prosecution was not able to present full facts due to lack of instructions from police. The court directed police to explain. Police confirmed instructions now available and enquiry ordered into failure to provide earlier. The court discussed prior case law on timely bail hearings and directed the DGP to create a transparent procedure for police to provide timely instructions to prosecutors for bail hearings across UP within 8 weeks.
Bom hc prisoners order apr 22
The High Court of Bombay heard a suo moto petition regarding under-trial prisoners in Maharashtra correctional homes. The Court directed the State to provide crime rate data after a recent lockdown order and to consider suggestions from an intervenor group on prisoner transfers. The State was given time to respond and submit a plan to decongest overcrowded prisons by shifting prisoners based on valid reasons, with any applications to be decided within 48 hours. The matter was adjourned to a future date for the State's responses.
Gauhati hc sep 9 order
The document is an order from the Gauhati High Court regarding a writ petition filed by Asor Uddin challenging a ex-parte order from the Foreigners' Tribunal declaring him to be a foreigner. The High Court allowed the petition, set aside the ex-parte order, and remanded the matter back to the Foreigners' Tribunal for fresh proceedings. However, the petitioner was ordered to remain on bail, appear before the Superintendent of Police, and the Foreigners' Tribunal by certain dates or the ex-parte order would be revived.
Guj hc pasa aug 25 order
The High Court of Gujarat quashed four detention orders issued by the District Magistrate of Amreli under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act against four petitioners for allegedly being "property grabbers". The Court found that the detaining authority erred in treating the petitioners' activities as prejudicial to public order, as it was a private property dispute. The Court also noted that the justification provided by the state for issuing the detention orders - that the petitioners would continue illegal activities with advocate help - was untenable. The rule was made absolute and the detention orders were quashed.
Gauhati hc
1) The petitioner had been declared a foreigner by a Foreigners Tribunal in Jorhat and has been in detention since May 2019, nearing completion of two years in detention.
2) In light of Supreme Court orders on releasing detainees who have completed two years to avoid COVID spread, the court directs the petitioner's release on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 5,000 and one surety of the same amount.
3) The court reiterates an earlier order directing authorities to release all detainees who have completed two years, on a personal bond and one surety to address the pandemic, while complying with other directions.
M p bangle seller bail
1) The applicant Golu @ Tasneem @ Taslim filed a bail application in the High Court of Madhya Pradesh seeking bail in connection with a crime registered under various sections of IPC and POCSO Act.
2) It was argued for the applicant that he is the first offender and has been in custody since August 23, 2021. His custodial interrogation is no longer required.
3) The prosecution opposed the bail plea submitting that various identity cards of different names were recovered from the applicant. The court examined the facts of the case and granted bail to the applicant with various conditions.
Madras hc anti caa cases quashed
The court quashed criminal proceedings against two petitioners who were accused of protesting against the Citizenship Amendment Act in 2019. The court found that while the petitioners' protest was unlawful for lacking proper permission, it was a peaceful protest and no criminal acts occurred. Further, witness statements did not properly identify the petitioners as being involved. Prior court rulings established the right to peaceful protest. Thus, the court concluded there was no prima facie evidence against the petitioners and continuing the prosecution would be an abuse of process.
July delhi hc order
1. Gulfisha Fatima filed a writ petition seeking a writ of habeas corpus to direct the State to produce her and release her from what she claims is illegal custody.
2. She was arrested in connection with multiple FIRs including charges under the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act. Her bail applications were dismissed except for one case where she was granted bail.
3. The court dismissed the writ petition stating that her detention was not illegal as she was in judicial custody pursuant to court orders and the remedy lies in appealing those orders, not through a writ of habeas corpus.
Gauhati hc order july 20
1) The petitioner challenged a Foreigners Tribunal order declaring her a foreigner.
2) The Court remanded the case back to the Foreigners Tribunal for reconsideration, noting communication issues with the petitioner's counsel resulted in her missing hearings.
3) The Court will allow the petitioner to appear before the Tribunal again to prove her citizenship, as this is an important right that should be decided on the merits rather than by default.
4) The impugned Foreigners Tribunal order declaring the petitioner a foreigner is set aside, and she must appear before the Tribunal within one month to prove she is an Indian citizen.
Guj hc pasa order
1. The petitioner filed this application to prevent his detention under the Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act (PASA) in connection with a criminal case registered against him for offenses related to wrongful confinement, criminal intimidation, and assault.
2. The court noted that the dispute appeared to be private in nature rather than dangerous, and seemed to be an attempt to use threats under PASA to settle a financial dispute.
3. The court therefore allowed the petition and directed that any detention order against the petitioner related to this case cannot be executed for one month, to prevent his detention under PASA which did not appear justified based on the nature of the allegations.
Guj hc order pasa aug 23
1) The appellant Karansinh Vaghela was detained under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act for offenses related to alcohol prohibition.
2) The High Court quashed the detention order, finding that a single offense was not sufficient to classify the appellant as a "bootlegger" under the law or show that his activities affected public order.
3) The Court held that detention requires more than a mere disturbance of law and order - it must be shown that the activities would affect the community or public interest more broadly. This was not established based on a single offense.
Sc order sept 30
The Supreme Court of India heard a writ petition filed by Yash Pal Singh, whose son was killed in an alleged encounter by police officers in 2002. The court noted that the case has been pending since then, and the police officers involved have not been properly investigated or prosecuted despite court orders. The court criticized the laxity of the state in defending its police officers. It directed the state of Uttar Pradesh to deposit Rs. 7 lakhs as interim costs to the petitioner, as he has been denied justice for 19 years. The matter was listed for further hearing on October 20th.
Bom hc nagpur july 29 order
The applicant challenged two orders - one extending his detention for 90 days under the UAPA and the other rejecting his application for default bail. The court analyzed whether the requirements for seeking extension of detention under the UAPA were satisfied. It found that the public prosecutor had submitted a detailed report outlining the progress of the investigation and reasons for seeking an extension. It also found that a joint application for the applicant and another accused was justified as the allegations against them were identical. Therefore, the mandatory requirements for extending detention under the UAPA were satisfied and the applicant was not entitled to default bail.
Madras hc dowry order
The petitioners, who are the parents of the deceased's husband, were convicted of dowry harassment under Section 498A of IPC for beating and harassing the deceased and demanding jewels and money, which caused her mental agony and suicide. They filed this appeal seeking to suspend their 2-year sentence. While the petitioners argued there were inconsistencies in the prosecution's case and they never lived with the deceased, the court found materials in the record to show the petitioners induced their son to demand dowry. The court dismissed the petition, noting parents have a responsibility to properly raise their children and cannot escape liability by not living with them, and upheld the conviction given the nature of the offense.
Delhi sessions court umar khalid handcuffs order
This document summarizes the court proceedings regarding applications to produce two accused persons, Umar Khalid and Khalid Saifi, in handcuffs. The court notes replies from jail superintendents, the DCP of Special Cell, and the DCP of the 3rd Battalion that suggest the applications lack merit as the prison rules do not mention handcuffing prisoners. As the accused are not convicted criminals or gangsters, the applications appear to have been filed without proper consideration. However, given new COVID protocols, the accused are no longer being produced in person in court, making the applications unnecessary at this stage. The court therefore dismisses the applications as not required.
Mp hc phc in prisons
The court considered an application for suspension of sentence from appellant Lalji Singh who was convicted of murder and other charges, and granted a further 90 day suspension of his sentence due to his heart ailment and the lack of proper medical facilities and transport in the jail. The court directed the state to improve primary healthcare in jails, including establishing on-site health centers, and to submit a report on current medical facilities, citing precedents requiring protection of prisoners' human rights.
Gulfisha bail order
The court order denies the application of accused Gulfisha Fatima for statutory bail under Section 167(2) of the CrPC. It notes that Gulfisha was arrested on April 11, 2020 in the present case. While over 183 days had passed since her arrest, the charge sheet was filed within the extended period of investigation on September 16, 2020. It also finds that the court has jurisdiction in this matter based on notifications and orders issued by the Delhi government and Delhi High Court designating the court to try cases related to the 2020 Delhi riots. Therefore, the court dismisses Gulfisha's application for statutory bail as no grounds for it exist.
Mp hc wp 9799 2021_final_order_28-jul-2021
1. The petitioner challenged his detention order under the Prevention of Black Marketing and Maintenance of Supplies of Essential Commodities Act, 1980.
2. The petitioner was running a business and an FIR was registered against him for illegally stocking and selling oxygen cylinders without a license. A raid found 571 jumbo and 90 small oxygen cylinders in his warehouse.
3. The petitioner argued that the detaining authority failed to consider that he was already in custody at the time the detention order was passed and his potential release on bail, which is required. The court found no mention of the petitioner's custody in the detention order.
Sc judgement 02-aug-2021
This document summarizes a Supreme Court of India judgment regarding a preventive detention order passed against a man under the Telangana Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act. The detention order was based on 5 FIRs filed against the man for cheating by collecting over 50 lakhs rupees from victims by promising high returns through stock market investments. The High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging the detention order. The Supreme Court is hearing an appeal of that dismissal.
Kush kalra sc order
The Supreme Court of India heard several petitions related to women's participation and recruitment in the Indian military. For one of the petitions, the Court directed the petitioner to file a rejoinder within a week and listed the matter for further hearing on September 8th. For another petition regarding a stay, the Court issued an interim order allowing women candidates to take an upcoming examination subject to the Court's further orders. The Court also directed the Union Public Service Commission to publicize the interim orders widely. The Court listed several related matters regarding women's participation in Sainik Schools and the Rashtriya Indian Military College for hearing on September 8th as well.
Sterlite plant order hc
The court reviewed a report submitted by the National Human Rights Commission regarding protests in which firing occurred against unarmed citizens. The court requested that copies of the report be provided to relevant parties. The court also noted recommendations in the report, including dropping cases against protesters and providing increased compensation to families of victims and injured persons. The court requested that the state consider the recommendations, provide counseling to families, and ensure a speedy and meaningful investigation into the firing incidents. The court further requested that the National Human Rights Commission conclude its pending investigation into the matter within the next four weeks and provide an update to the court.
Delhi riots bail feb 3
1. This document summarizes a bail application hearing for Kuldeep Singh, who is accused in an FIR for rioting and murder.
2. The defense argues that Kuldeep should be granted bail on the grounds that other co-accused have received bail and he has been in custody since March 2020. However, the prosecution argues that Kuldeep was identified by witnesses as part of the riotous mob that beat the victim to death.
3. The judge heard arguments from both sides and will review the case details and chargesheet before making a decision on whether to grant bail to Kuldeep Singh.
Scr.a88942020 gjhc240605762020 5_26082021
1) The petitioner challenged an order passed by the Assistant Commissioner of Police externig him from several districts for one year.
2) The High Court stayed the execution of the externment order citing issues with it.
3) In its final order, the High Court quashed the externment order, finding that the order relied on two FIRs not mentioned in the notice given to the petitioner and that one of the FIRs mentioned in the notice was for demonstrating against a government policy wherein citizens have a right to raise grievances. The Court also noted inconsistencies in the responses by the authorities.
Chand mohammad pre arrest bail order
1) The court heard arguments from the counsel for the applicant Mohd. Chand and the counsel for the state in a criminal case involving sections 153A, 295, 505, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 of the IPC.
2) The applicant was seeking anticipatory bail in a case involving allegations of disrespecting religious feelings and disturbing communal harmony by performing namaz inside a temple.
3) The court granted anticipatory bail to the applicant with conditions including surrendering his passport, not contacting witnesses, and appearing for key court hearings.
Adil v state of up
This document is a court order summarizing a case involving an application for anticipatory bail. The applicant, Adil, had previously been granted anticipatory bail until the police report was submitted. Now that the charge sheet has been submitted and cognizance taken, Adil applied again for anticipatory bail until the conclusion of trial. The court reviewed relevant case law and determined that anticipatory bail can be granted at this stage. Considering the facts of the case, the court granted Adil anticipatory bail until the conclusion of trial, subject to certain conditions.
More Related Content
What's hot
Guj hc pasa aug 25 order
The High Court of Gujarat quashed four detention orders issued by the District Magistrate of Amreli under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act against four petitioners for allegedly being "property grabbers". The Court found that the detaining authority erred in treating the petitioners' activities as prejudicial to public order, as it was a private property dispute. The Court also noted that the justification provided by the state for issuing the detention orders - that the petitioners would continue illegal activities with advocate help - was untenable. The rule was made absolute and the detention orders were quashed.
Gauhati hc
1) The petitioner had been declared a foreigner by a Foreigners Tribunal in Jorhat and has been in detention since May 2019, nearing completion of two years in detention.
2) In light of Supreme Court orders on releasing detainees who have completed two years to avoid COVID spread, the court directs the petitioner's release on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 5,000 and one surety of the same amount.
3) The court reiterates an earlier order directing authorities to release all detainees who have completed two years, on a personal bond and one surety to address the pandemic, while complying with other directions.
M p bangle seller bail
1) The applicant Golu @ Tasneem @ Taslim filed a bail application in the High Court of Madhya Pradesh seeking bail in connection with a crime registered under various sections of IPC and POCSO Act.
2) It was argued for the applicant that he is the first offender and has been in custody since August 23, 2021. His custodial interrogation is no longer required.
3) The prosecution opposed the bail plea submitting that various identity cards of different names were recovered from the applicant. The court examined the facts of the case and granted bail to the applicant with various conditions.
Madras hc anti caa cases quashed
The court quashed criminal proceedings against two petitioners who were accused of protesting against the Citizenship Amendment Act in 2019. The court found that while the petitioners' protest was unlawful for lacking proper permission, it was a peaceful protest and no criminal acts occurred. Further, witness statements did not properly identify the petitioners as being involved. Prior court rulings established the right to peaceful protest. Thus, the court concluded there was no prima facie evidence against the petitioners and continuing the prosecution would be an abuse of process.
July delhi hc order
1. Gulfisha Fatima filed a writ petition seeking a writ of habeas corpus to direct the State to produce her and release her from what she claims is illegal custody.
2. She was arrested in connection with multiple FIRs including charges under the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act. Her bail applications were dismissed except for one case where she was granted bail.
3. The court dismissed the writ petition stating that her detention was not illegal as she was in judicial custody pursuant to court orders and the remedy lies in appealing those orders, not through a writ of habeas corpus.
Gauhati hc order july 20
1) The petitioner challenged a Foreigners Tribunal order declaring her a foreigner.
2) The Court remanded the case back to the Foreigners Tribunal for reconsideration, noting communication issues with the petitioner's counsel resulted in her missing hearings.
3) The Court will allow the petitioner to appear before the Tribunal again to prove her citizenship, as this is an important right that should be decided on the merits rather than by default.
4) The impugned Foreigners Tribunal order declaring the petitioner a foreigner is set aside, and she must appear before the Tribunal within one month to prove she is an Indian citizen.
Guj hc pasa order
1. The petitioner filed this application to prevent his detention under the Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act (PASA) in connection with a criminal case registered against him for offenses related to wrongful confinement, criminal intimidation, and assault.
2. The court noted that the dispute appeared to be private in nature rather than dangerous, and seemed to be an attempt to use threats under PASA to settle a financial dispute.
3. The court therefore allowed the petition and directed that any detention order against the petitioner related to this case cannot be executed for one month, to prevent his detention under PASA which did not appear justified based on the nature of the allegations.
Guj hc order pasa aug 23
1) The appellant Karansinh Vaghela was detained under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act for offenses related to alcohol prohibition.
2) The High Court quashed the detention order, finding that a single offense was not sufficient to classify the appellant as a "bootlegger" under the law or show that his activities affected public order.
3) The Court held that detention requires more than a mere disturbance of law and order - it must be shown that the activities would affect the community or public interest more broadly. This was not established based on a single offense.
Sc order sept 30
The Supreme Court of India heard a writ petition filed by Yash Pal Singh, whose son was killed in an alleged encounter by police officers in 2002. The court noted that the case has been pending since then, and the police officers involved have not been properly investigated or prosecuted despite court orders. The court criticized the laxity of the state in defending its police officers. It directed the state of Uttar Pradesh to deposit Rs. 7 lakhs as interim costs to the petitioner, as he has been denied justice for 19 years. The matter was listed for further hearing on October 20th.
Bom hc nagpur july 29 order
The applicant challenged two orders - one extending his detention for 90 days under the UAPA and the other rejecting his application for default bail. The court analyzed whether the requirements for seeking extension of detention under the UAPA were satisfied. It found that the public prosecutor had submitted a detailed report outlining the progress of the investigation and reasons for seeking an extension. It also found that a joint application for the applicant and another accused was justified as the allegations against them were identical. Therefore, the mandatory requirements for extending detention under the UAPA were satisfied and the applicant was not entitled to default bail.
Madras hc dowry order
The petitioners, who are the parents of the deceased's husband, were convicted of dowry harassment under Section 498A of IPC for beating and harassing the deceased and demanding jewels and money, which caused her mental agony and suicide. They filed this appeal seeking to suspend their 2-year sentence. While the petitioners argued there were inconsistencies in the prosecution's case and they never lived with the deceased, the court found materials in the record to show the petitioners induced their son to demand dowry. The court dismissed the petition, noting parents have a responsibility to properly raise their children and cannot escape liability by not living with them, and upheld the conviction given the nature of the offense.
Delhi sessions court umar khalid handcuffs order
This document summarizes the court proceedings regarding applications to produce two accused persons, Umar Khalid and Khalid Saifi, in handcuffs. The court notes replies from jail superintendents, the DCP of Special Cell, and the DCP of the 3rd Battalion that suggest the applications lack merit as the prison rules do not mention handcuffing prisoners. As the accused are not convicted criminals or gangsters, the applications appear to have been filed without proper consideration. However, given new COVID protocols, the accused are no longer being produced in person in court, making the applications unnecessary at this stage. The court therefore dismisses the applications as not required.
Mp hc phc in prisons
The court considered an application for suspension of sentence from appellant Lalji Singh who was convicted of murder and other charges, and granted a further 90 day suspension of his sentence due to his heart ailment and the lack of proper medical facilities and transport in the jail. The court directed the state to improve primary healthcare in jails, including establishing on-site health centers, and to submit a report on current medical facilities, citing precedents requiring protection of prisoners' human rights.
Gulfisha bail order
The court order denies the application of accused Gulfisha Fatima for statutory bail under Section 167(2) of the CrPC. It notes that Gulfisha was arrested on April 11, 2020 in the present case. While over 183 days had passed since her arrest, the charge sheet was filed within the extended period of investigation on September 16, 2020. It also finds that the court has jurisdiction in this matter based on notifications and orders issued by the Delhi government and Delhi High Court designating the court to try cases related to the 2020 Delhi riots. Therefore, the court dismisses Gulfisha's application for statutory bail as no grounds for it exist.
Mp hc wp 9799 2021_final_order_28-jul-2021
1. The petitioner challenged his detention order under the Prevention of Black Marketing and Maintenance of Supplies of Essential Commodities Act, 1980.
2. The petitioner was running a business and an FIR was registered against him for illegally stocking and selling oxygen cylinders without a license. A raid found 571 jumbo and 90 small oxygen cylinders in his warehouse.
3. The petitioner argued that the detaining authority failed to consider that he was already in custody at the time the detention order was passed and his potential release on bail, which is required. The court found no mention of the petitioner's custody in the detention order.
Sc judgement 02-aug-2021
This document summarizes a Supreme Court of India judgment regarding a preventive detention order passed against a man under the Telangana Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act. The detention order was based on 5 FIRs filed against the man for cheating by collecting over 50 lakhs rupees from victims by promising high returns through stock market investments. The High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging the detention order. The Supreme Court is hearing an appeal of that dismissal.
Kush kalra sc order
The Supreme Court of India heard several petitions related to women's participation and recruitment in the Indian military. For one of the petitions, the Court directed the petitioner to file a rejoinder within a week and listed the matter for further hearing on September 8th. For another petition regarding a stay, the Court issued an interim order allowing women candidates to take an upcoming examination subject to the Court's further orders. The Court also directed the Union Public Service Commission to publicize the interim orders widely. The Court listed several related matters regarding women's participation in Sainik Schools and the Rashtriya Indian Military College for hearing on September 8th as well.
Sterlite plant order hc
The court reviewed a report submitted by the National Human Rights Commission regarding protests in which firing occurred against unarmed citizens. The court requested that copies of the report be provided to relevant parties. The court also noted recommendations in the report, including dropping cases against protesters and providing increased compensation to families of victims and injured persons. The court requested that the state consider the recommendations, provide counseling to families, and ensure a speedy and meaningful investigation into the firing incidents. The court further requested that the National Human Rights Commission conclude its pending investigation into the matter within the next four weeks and provide an update to the court.
Delhi riots bail feb 3
1. This document summarizes a bail application hearing for Kuldeep Singh, who is accused in an FIR for rioting and murder.
2. The defense argues that Kuldeep should be granted bail on the grounds that other co-accused have received bail and he has been in custody since March 2020. However, the prosecution argues that Kuldeep was identified by witnesses as part of the riotous mob that beat the victim to death.
3. The judge heard arguments from both sides and will review the case details and chargesheet before making a decision on whether to grant bail to Kuldeep Singh.
Scr.a88942020 gjhc240605762020 5_26082021
1) The petitioner challenged an order passed by the Assistant Commissioner of Police externig him from several districts for one year.
2) The High Court stayed the execution of the externment order citing issues with it.
3) In its final order, the High Court quashed the externment order, finding that the order relied on two FIRs not mentioned in the notice given to the petitioner and that one of the FIRs mentioned in the notice was for demonstrating against a government policy wherein citizens have a right to raise grievances. The Court also noted inconsistencies in the responses by the authorities.
What's hot (20)
Similar to Allahabad hc order yogeshraj bail
Chand mohammad pre arrest bail order
1) The court heard arguments from the counsel for the applicant Mohd. Chand and the counsel for the state in a criminal case involving sections 153A, 295, 505, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 of the IPC.
2) The applicant was seeking anticipatory bail in a case involving allegations of disrespecting religious feelings and disturbing communal harmony by performing namaz inside a temple.
3) The court granted anticipatory bail to the applicant with conditions including surrendering his passport, not contacting witnesses, and appearing for key court hearings.
Adil v state of up
This document is a court order summarizing a case involving an application for anticipatory bail. The applicant, Adil, had previously been granted anticipatory bail until the police report was submitted. Now that the charge sheet has been submitted and cognizance taken, Adil applied again for anticipatory bail until the conclusion of trial. The court reviewed relevant case law and determined that anticipatory bail can be granted at this stage. Considering the facts of the case, the court granted Adil anticipatory bail until the conclusion of trial, subject to certain conditions.
Allahabad hc rao vs state of up (1)
The court heard arguments on a bail application filed by Akhilanand Rao, who was accused of making objectionable remarks against the Chief Minister and others under Sections 419, 420, 120B IPC 66D of I.T Act. While the prosecution argued against bail, the defense claimed it was a false implication. Considering Article 21 of the Constitution regarding personal liberty, the court granted bail to Rao with conditions, including furnishing a personal bond, cooperating with trial, not engaging in crimes or tampering with evidence, and restricting social media use for two years or until trial conclusion.
Allahabad hc rao vs state of up (1)
The applicant, Akhilanand Rao, filed a bail application to be released pending trial in a criminal case in the District of Deoria. He is accused under Sections 419, 420, 120B IPC 66D of making objectionable remarks against the Chief Minister and falsely claiming statuses. The court considered the applicant's criminal history and Article 21 rights. While not expressing opinion on the merits, the court granted bail with conditions, including furnishing a personal bond and sureties, cooperating with trial, not engaging in crimes or intimidating witnesses, and not using social media for two years or until trial conclusion. Breach of conditions could lead to bail cancellation.
20201026 allahabad hc_bail_cow_slaughter
The applicant, Rahmu @ Rahmuddin, applied for bail in Case Crime No. 147 of 2020 under the U.P. Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act. The court considered that the applicant was not arrested from the spot, the offense is triable by a magistrate with a maximum sentence of 7 years, and the act is often misused by showing recovered meat as cow meat without analysis. Considering this and precedent from the Supreme Court, the court granted bail to the applicant with 10 conditions, such as cooperating with the trial and not engaging in criminal activity.
Allahabad hc bail(a) 16315 2021
This document is a court order summarizing a bail application hearing for a case involving charges of rape, fraud, criminal intimidation, and unlawful religious conversion. The applicant, Sonu Rajpoot, sought bail while awaiting trial. The court summarized the arguments of the applicant's lawyer, who argued that the victim was a consenting adult and the applicant was falsely accused due to a religious conversion dispute. The prosecution opposed bail. Considering the circumstances, lack of evidence tampering, and consent between the applicant and victim, the court granted bail to the applicant with conditions including not harassing the victim.
Allahabad High Court order.pdf
The document is a court order regarding a bail application. It summarizes that the applicant Monu is accused of kidnapping and rape of a 17-year-old girl, with whom he had a child. The court grants bail to Monu on conditions that he marries the victim within 15 days of release, registers the marriage within a month, and provides rights to the victim and child as his wife and daughter. Monu must also appear on all court dates and not delay evidence collection.
Jnk hc order dec 24
This document provides a 3-page summary of a bail application hearing in the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir.
[1] The petitioner, Aman Sagotra, is seeking bail in an FIR registered under Section 376 IPC (rape) against him. He claims the sexual relationship was consensual as the prosecutrix willingly entered into it.
[2] However, the prosecutrix alleges the petitioner developed an illicit relationship with her against her will while she was a minor, and raped her on 22.10.2019 by threatening her.
[3] Considering the factors governing bail under law, the Court finds a prima facie case of rape against the petitioner. It
Jnk hc bail ndps
The petitioner Suraj Kumar was arrested for possession of 500 grams of charas and charged with offenses under the NDPS Act. His bail application to the trial court was rejected. In this petition, the High Court considers whether to grant bail. [The High Court grants bail to the petitioner, finding that the quantity was intermediate and not commercial, so the rigors of section 37 do not apply. It also finds that further incarceration would be punitive without conviction. The petitioner is granted bail on furnishing a bond and with conditions of appearing for hearings, not leaving the jurisdiction, and not contacting witnesses.]
Asif_Sultan_Syeda_vs_UT_of_J_K.pdf op[ke[k
न्यायालय को सुल्तान के आचरण पर संदेह करने का कोई कारण नहीं मिला और साथ ही उसके न्याय से भागने की कोई संभावना नहीं थी, फिर भी जमानत की शर्तों के रूप में सुल्तान की संचार विधियों और गतिविधियों पर कड़े प्रतिबंध लगाए गए।
Sample criminal proceedings
The petitioner Pushpalatha S filed a petition against respondent Guruswamy S under Section 125(1) of CrPC seeking maintenance. The petitioner and respondent got married on 12-08-2010 in a mass marriage ceremony registered in the Sub-Registrar office of Chamarajanagar. However, the respondent left the petitioner and started living separately without reasonable cause after 2 months of marriage. The petitioner has no independent source of income and is unable to maintain herself. Hence, the petitioner requested that the respondent be directed to pay monthly maintenance of Rs. 5000 for her livelihood.
Court formats
This include some important formats applicable in Indian courts and is very essential for Law Students.
These formats may even be translated to the local (scheduled) indian languages and may be used in the respective courts.
Abad hc love jihad bail
This document summarizes a court case in Criminal Appeal No. 2158 of 2021. The appellant, Motilal, appealed to set aside an order denying him bail. Motilal claims to have had a distinct role from co-accused, only being present during the alleged victim's conversion, not directly involved. The court found nothing convincing justifying denying bail. The court allowed the appeal and set aside the order denying bail, ordering Motilal be released on bail with conditions but not extending to co-accused.
Nitin raj vs state
The court document summarizes a bail application hearing for an applicant named Nitin Raj, who was charged with various offenses related to participating in protests against the Citizenship Amendment Act. The prosecution argued Raj helped create a law and order situation and obstructed traffic. However, the defense argued Raj was falsely implicated, had no criminal history, and had not engaged in any unlawful activity during a prior release. Considering these factors and that the charged offenses carry less than 7 years imprisonment, the court granted Raj bail with conditions that he cannot tamper with evidence, seek adjournments, or engage in further criminal activity.
Allahabad hc may 10
1) The document is a court order from the Allahabad High Court regarding an anticipatory bail application filed by Prateek Jain who is accused in a criminal case of fraud and cheating.
2) The court notes that due to the ongoing Covid-19 pandemic, the hearing is being conducted virtually. It also discusses the provisions around anticipatory bail in the CrPC and relevant case laws.
3) In its order, the court considers the arguments made by both sides and then discusses how it will exercise its discretion in light of the circumstances around the case as well as the current pandemic situation.
Up hc order
1) The document is a court order from the Allahabad High Court regarding an anticipatory bail application filed by Prateek Jain who is accused in a criminal case of fraud and cheating.
2) The court notes that due to the ongoing Covid-19 pandemic, the hearing is being conducted virtually. It also discusses the provisions around anticipatory bail applications in the CrPC.
3) In its order, the court considers the arguments made by the defense and prosecution and ultimately decides to grant anticipatory bail to the applicant while imposing certain conditions.
Dr. Kumar Bail Order
The applicant, Dr. Satish, who is a qualified medical practitioner with no prior criminal record, applied for bail in a case where he has been charged with offenses related to a shortage of medical oxygen at a hospital where he was head of the anesthesia department. The court analyzed documents and statements from the investigation and found that the applicant was not involved in procuring, billing or payments for the medical oxygen supplies. Considering this and that the applicant has already spent 7 months in custody, the court granted bail to the applicant with conditions to ensure his presence at trial.
jugadi-alias-nijamuddin-vs-state-of-up-thru-secy-home-civil-sect-lko-and-anot...
jugadi-alias-nijamuddin-vs-state-of-up-thru-secy-home-civil-sect-lko-and-another-allahabad-high-court-466663.pdf
Faisal khan v state of up
Faisal Khan applied for bail in a case where he is accused of disrespecting religious feelings and disturbing communal harmony by performing namaz inside a temple without permission. His lawyer argued that he has been falsely implicated and was actually performing namaz outside the temple with the priest's permission. The court granted bail to Khan with conditions that he cannot tamper with evidence, seek adjournments, engage in criminal activity, or use social media until the trial concludes.
SC Interim Bail to Teesta Setalvad_Order_02-Sep-2022 (1).pdf
The Supreme Court of India granted interim bail to Teesta Setalvad who had been in judicial custody since June 2022 regarding charges related to fabricating evidence in the 2002 Gujarat riots cases. While not examining the merits of the case, the Court noted that Setalvad had been in custody for over 2 months, essential investigation was complete, and the offenses dated back to 2002. It directed that she be released on interim bail on furnishing a cash bond or surety until the High Court considers her regular bail application. The Court clarified this should not be seen as a reflection on the case merits.
Similar to Allahabad hc order yogeshraj bail (20)
jugadi-alias-nijamuddin-vs-state-of-up-thru-secy-home-civil-sect-lko-and-anot...
jugadi-alias-nijamuddin-vs-state-of-up-thru-secy-home-civil-sect-lko-and-anot...
SC Interim Bail to Teesta Setalvad_Order_02-Sep-2022 (1).pdf
SC Interim Bail to Teesta Setalvad_Order_02-Sep-2022 (1).pdf
Recently uploaded
On the Wrong Track | Recent Increasing Train Accidents in India | News
#On_the_Wrong_Track, This article talks about the recent train accidents in India and gives helpful suggestions #harshkumar #trainaccidents
Telecommunications-act-2023-notified.pdf
दूरसंचार अधिनियम, 2023 की धाराएं 1, 2, 10 से 30, 42 से 44, 46, 47, 50 से 58, 61 और 62 अधिसूचित
bombay-hc-hamare-baraah-film-June-6.pdfde
विवादास्पद फिल्म के ट्रेलर से गाली-गलौज वाले दृश्य हटा दिए गए हैं, और जुर्माना लगाया गया है। सुप्रीम कोर्ट और बॉम्बे हाई कोर्ट दोनों ने फिल्म की रिलीज पर रोक लगा दी है और उसे निलंबित कर दिया है। पहले यह फिल्म 7 जून और फिर 14 जून को रिलीज होने वाली थी, लेकिन अब यह 21 जून को रिलीज हो रही है।
#WenguiGuo#WashingtonFarm Guo Wengui Wolf son ambition exposed to open a far...
Since fleeing to the United States in 2014, Guo Wengui has founded a number of projects in the United States, such as GTV Media Group, GTV private equity, farm loan project, G Club Operations Co., LTD., and Himalaya Exchange.
JOH pide al juez Castel 40 años como sentencia mínima
La defensa del expresidente Juan Orlando Hernández, declarado culpable por narcotráfico en EE. UU., solicitó este viernes al juez Kevin Castel que imponga una condena mínima de 40 años de prisión.
projet de traité négocié à Istanbul (anglais).pdf
Ceci est le projet de traité qui avait été négocié entre Russes et Ukrainiens à Istanbul en mars 2022, avant que les Etats-Unis et la Grande-Bretagne ne détournent Kiev de signer.
21062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss. For real time update Visit our social media handle. Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace. Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
Call Girls In Surat Book Me Monika:- 7737669865 | For Hot Moments Direct Cash...
Call Girls In Surat Book Me Monika:- 7737669865 | For Hot Moments Direct Cash Payment Friendship
Federal Authorities Urge Vigilance Amid Bird Flu Outbreak | The Lifesciences ...
Federal Authorities Urge Vigilance Amid Bird Flu Outbreak | The Lifesciences ...The Lifesciences Magazine
Federal authorities have advised the public to remain vigilant but calm in response to the ongoing bird flu outbreak of highly pathogenic avian influenza, commonly known as bird flu.Punjabi News Paper | Apna Punjabi Media
Apna Punjab Media is a Punjabi newspaper that covers local and global news, cultural updates, and community events. It's a trusted source for Punjabi-speaking communities, offering a mix of traditional values and modern insights into Punjab's vibrant life and heritage.
16062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss. For real time update Visit our social media handle. Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace. Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
ACSA confirms operational readiness ahead the arrival of Heads of State at OR...
ACSA says it is ready for the arrival of foreign heads of state ahead of the Presidential Inauguration on Wednesday at OR Tambo International Airport.
TN-Students-Caste-Discrimination-Chandru-Commission.pdf
रिपोर्ट में सभी छात्रों के लिए समान अवसर सुनिश्चित करने के लिए प्रशासनिक सुधार, शिक्षक प्रशिक्षण और जातिगत हिंसा से निपटने की बात कही गई है।
20062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss. For real time update Visit our social media handle. Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace. Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
The Rise of Christian Persecution In Islamic Countries
Christian persecution in Islamic countries has intensified, with alarming incidents of violence, discrimination, and intolerance. This article highlights recent attacks in Nigeria, Pakistan, Egypt, Iran, and Iraq, exposing the multifaceted challenges faced by Christian communities. Despite the severity of these atrocities, the Western world's response remains muted due to political, economic, and social considerations. The urgent need for international intervention is underscored, emphasizing that without substantial support, the future of Christianity in these regions is at grave risk.
https://ecspe.org/the-rise-of-christian-persecution-in-islamic-countries/
Polarised Media Framing of Climate Protests
Paper presented by Katharina Esau at the ICA 2024 conference, 1 June 2024.
18062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss. For real time update Visit our social media handle. Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace. Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
Bombay-hc-hamare-baraah-order-june-7.pdf
19 जून को बॉम्बे हाई कोर्ट ने विवादित फिल्म ‘हमारे बारह’ को 21 जून को थिएटर में रिलीज करने का रास्ता साफ कर दिया, हालांकि यह सुनिश्चित करने के बाद कि फिल्म निर्माता कुछ आपत्तिजनक अंशों को हटा दें।
JOH pide al juez Castel 40 años como sentencia mínima
La defensa del expresidente Juan Orlando Hernández, declarado culpable por narcotráfico en EE. UU., solicitó este viernes al juez Kevin Castel que imponga una condena mínima de 40 años de prisión.
Recently uploaded (20)
On the Wrong Track | Recent Increasing Train Accidents in India | News
On the Wrong Track | Recent Increasing Train Accidents in India | News
#WenguiGuo#WashingtonFarm Guo Wengui Wolf son ambition exposed to open a far...
#WenguiGuo#WashingtonFarm Guo Wengui Wolf son ambition exposed to open a far...
JOH pide al juez Castel 40 años como sentencia mínima
JOH pide al juez Castel 40 años como sentencia mínima
The Impact of Imperial Mode of Living on Migration.pdf
The Impact of Imperial Mode of Living on Migration.pdf
Call Girls In Surat Book Me Monika:- 7737669865 | For Hot Moments Direct Cash...
Call Girls In Surat Book Me Monika:- 7737669865 | For Hot Moments Direct Cash...
Federal Authorities Urge Vigilance Amid Bird Flu Outbreak | The Lifesciences ...
Federal Authorities Urge Vigilance Amid Bird Flu Outbreak | The Lifesciences ...
ACSA confirms operational readiness ahead the arrival of Heads of State at OR...
ACSA confirms operational readiness ahead the arrival of Heads of State at OR...
TN-Students-Caste-Discrimination-Chandru-Commission.pdf
TN-Students-Caste-Discrimination-Chandru-Commission.pdf
The Rise of Christian Persecution In Islamic Countries
The Rise of Christian Persecution In Islamic Countries
JOH pide al juez Castel 40 años como sentencia mínima
JOH pide al juez Castel 40 años como sentencia mínima
Allahabad hc order yogeshraj bail
- 1. Court No. - 78 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 39678 of 2019 Applicant :- Yogeshraj Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Anand Pati Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Siddharth,J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record. The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant, Yogeshraj, with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No. 583 of 2018, under Section 124-A I.P.C., Police Station- Syana, District- Bulandshahar during pendency of trial. Learned counsel for the applicant has contended that the co- accused, Ashish Kumar, has been granted bail by this Court on 21.8.2019 in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.33845 of 2019. The case of the applicant stands on identical footing, hence the applicant is also entitled for bail on the ground of parity. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail. Learned AGA has opposed the prayer for bail, but does not dispute the claim of parity. Let the applicant involved in aforesaid case be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions which are being imposed in the interest of justice:- 1. The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial. 2. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment. 3. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted. Order Date :- 25.9.2019 Ruchi Agrahari