A Case for Further Internationalization
• Company snapshot
• Playground industry overview
• Market Identification
• Final Selection
• Recommendations
PresentationOutline
CompanySnapshot
Legal name Babycam
International trading name Vinciplay
Employees 50
Year of founding 2009
Founder Pawel Chodkowski
Managing Director Piotr Nadulne
Head Offices Warsaw, Poland
Production and Warehousing facilities Lowicz, Poland
Exports to 15 countries
References Skanska, Sheraton, Municipality of
Radom, etc.
Exclusivity
agreements
preferred by
construction
companies
Strategic and
economically
interesting
partners
Contacts, trust
and quality are
important
factors for
manufacturers
Niche and
highly linked to
the construction
sector
Cost-efficient
players from
countries with low-
labor cost are
increasingly eating
away at incumbent
players
Long-term
relationships
Mature
Industry
PLAYGROUNDINDUSTRYOVERVIEW
SWOT Analysis
Strengths
•  Low-Cost, high quality production
•  Flexibility of organization
•  Flexibility of entry-mode
•  Can react relatively quickly to market trends
•  Strong enough financial base to expand with an
export-based or OEM model (assumed based on
further int’l interest)
Weaknesses
•  Short market & business experience
•  Low credibility
•  Young, Polish company with, as of yet, little
reputation
•  Weak financial base relative to some established
competitors
•  SMART playground research still in idea phase
Opportunities
•  Numerous potential markets for expansion
•  SMART playground technology
•  Potential for OEM or other deals
•  High client-reach with international playground
conference/expo presence
Threats
•  Implementation of SMART playgrounds in the
playground sector, Chinese low-cost, high-quality
producers could compete with pirated or original
products, Takeover threats by larger players
ABorn-AgainGlobal
According to Bell “well-established firms that have previously focused on their
domestic markets, but which suddenly embrace rapid and dedicated
internationalization", are known as ‘Born Again Globals’.
5 years in POLAND before market expansion
Vinciplay’s foreign markets operations include:
Austria, Spain, Denmark, Norway, Sweden,
Slovakia, UK, Netherlands, France, Luxembourg,
Switzerland, Israel, Italy, Hungary, Russia
Export-based entry model, low risk approach
MarketIdentification
Phase 1
•  Initial analysis of 20 potential markets derived through group discussions based
on Vinciplay’s past expansion efforts and attitudes and internationalization
strategy of expanding into adjacent and nearby European countries
Phase 2
•  Based on GDP, GDP from construction, inflation, housing index, business
confidence and corporate tax rate, as well as geopolitical issues we narrowed
down our potential market selection to 5 and compared the above metrics
Phase 3
•  Further narrowing down our selection, we employed a PESTEL analysis, and
were ultimately left with two potential markets for short- to medium-term
expansion
Phase 1 Phase 2
Germany
Sweden
Switzerland
China
United States
Latvia
Lithuania
Estonia
Azerbaijan
Russia
Mexico
Portugal
Japan
Turkey
Kazakhstan
Italy
South Korea
•  Germany
•  Italy
•  Turkey
•  United States
•  Estonia
•  Lithuania
•  Latvia
Italy
Politically stabile Eurozone country, has
survived the economic crisis of 2008-2009
Corruption in Italy is always a potential
issue
From 2012 we can see good rising
tendency in Italy’s GDP
Corporate Taxation beneficial 27,5%
in Italy versus 31,7% in Poland
Very family focused and community
is “importante”
Environmental rules and
regulations most focused on protecting
historical ruins/UNESCO sites, which
are everywhere in Italian cities.
According to the Italian population
pyramid for 2015 and 2020, 5-9 year
olds are 2,2% of the population.
+_
Turkey
The main advantage of Turkey is that their
government provide policies on
liberalisation.
Turkey suffers from widespread corruption and
bureaucratic system.
According to the projection made by
Goldman Sachs till 2050 this country is
going to have 9th largest economy in the
world
+_
Had huge trade gap during last few years, but in
2015 Government manages to decrease it by
39.8 percent compared to year earlier.
Turkey has growing proportion of young
population and most families have more
than 2 children in a family.
The proportion of the population below
age 15 in Turkey is one of the highest
among OECD countries, 25.5 %
There are some delays in the Turkish judicial
system and in addition some judges who are
politically influenced what can easily influence
on results of some cases
Baltics
Incorporation law in Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia
is constituted to be friendly and simply for
entrepreneurs.
An European Union members in 2005
+_
On the contrary Estonia has recently
noted slowdown in economy.
Favourable conditions for setting up business
Baltics have flat rate tax systems and they are
investors friendly
For all three countries domestic
demand will be the most important
factor for the economy growth.
Baltic’s populations are constantly
shrinking
Leading communications infrastructures
provide excellent conditions to foreign
entrepreneurs
Fertility rate is still between the
lowest in European Union
USA
Strong consumer and construction sector
spending power and habit of constructing new
buildings/complexes
“Made in America”/”Buying American”
important
Interactive SMART playgrounds will
most likely appear soon in the US and
thus provide an opportunity/threat for
Vinciplay
+_
Upcoming Presidential election will have
effect on infrastructure spending
Cooperative, friendly Political/Trade
Relationship between US-PL
Cultural, psychological, geographical
distances
High investment cost
Increasing focus on safety and quality
Germany
+_
Increases in public investment in
infrastructureEconomic activity has not been stable
Business investments have disappointed
The federal government has made EUR
600 million available for further urban
development over the period
2014-2015
Since 2002 Germany has an aging
population.
The population will fall to 65 million
people
High standard of living and social security
Largest population in the EU
Germany and Poland having strong
trading relations
FirstwepaidattentiontocountryGDP,asthemostgeneralfeatureofeverycountry.Itgaveusabroadpicture
ofhoweconomicallydevelopedtheyare.
$17 419,00 $18 010,00 $18 423,00 $22 000,00 $25 000,00
$3 853,00 $3 890,00 $3 978,00 $4 594,00
$8 248,00
$800,00 $807,00 $814,00 $942,00 $1 117,00
$2 144,34 $2 207,00 $2 224,00 $2 358,00
$3 396,00
$48,17 $48,31 $49,22 $58,44
$75,56
$31,92 $27,55 $27,16
$37,86
$47,75
$25,90 $24,50 $24,64
$30,93
$39,18
$1,00
$10,00
$100,00
$1 000,00
$10 000,00
$100 000,00
GDP 2014 (bill) Forecast about GDP in
2015 (bill)
Forecast about GDP in
Q3/2016(bill)
Forecast about GDP in
2020(bill)
Forecast about GDP in
2030( bill)
GDP
USA
Germany
Turkey
Italy
Lithuania
Latvia
Estonia
After general overview of these countries we decide to go deeper in this analyze. As Vinciplay’s
representative told that they mostly work with constricting companies we decided that it will be important
to pay attention not only to general GDP but also to GDP from contraction.
$686,20 $713,54 $732,00 $763,48 $766,63
$27,22
$36,69 $32,42 $36,70 $40,12
$17,24 $16,91 $16,74 $17,29 $20,10
$0,18
$0,26 $0,27 $0,24 $0,24
$0,66 $0,73 $0,71 $0,78
$1,03
$0,10
$1,00
$10,00
$100,00
$1 000,00
GDP from constraction in
Q1/2015 (bill.)
Forecast about GDP from
constraction in Q4/2015
(bill.)
Forecast about GDP from
constraction in Q3/2016
(bill.)
Forecast about GDP from
constraction in 2020 (bill.)
Forecast about GDP from
constraction in 2030 (bill.)
GDP from construction
USA
Germany
Italy
Estonia
Turkey
Acomparisonofothereconomicalindicators
-2,00%
0,00%
2,00%
4,00%
6,00%
8,00%
10,00%
Inflation
rate 2014
Forecast
about
Inflation
rate
Q4/2015
Forecast
about
Inflation
rate
Q3/2016
Forecast
about
Inflation
rate 2020
Forecast
about
Inflation
rate 2030
Inflation rate
USA
Germany
Turkey
Italy
Lithuania
Latvia
Estonia
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
Housing
Index 2014
Forecast
about
Housing
Index Q4/
2015
Forecast
about
Housing
Index
Q3/16
Forecast
about
Housing
Index 2020
Forecast
about
Housing
Index 2030
House index
USA
Germany
Turkey
Italy
Lithuania
Latvia
Estonia
0,00%
5,00%
10,00%
15,00%
20,00%
25,00%
30,00%
35,00%
40,00%
45,00%
Corporate Tax Rate
2014
Forecast about
Corporate Tax Rate
Q4/2015
Forecast about
Corporate Tax Rate
Q3/2016
Forecast about
Corporate Tax Rate
2020
Forecast about
Corporate Tax Rate
2030
Corporate tax rate
USA
Germany
Turkey
Italy
Lithuania
Latvia
Estonia
GermanyPhase 3
•  5+1 Porter’s analysis
•  Recomendations
•  Quastions to potential partners
•  PPP
•  Am lot of big players are active
•  The new company needs a “German” profile
•  The relative maturity of the playground market
•  A niche market, which may hamper transparency and knowledge about operating
Threat of New
Entrants: Medium
Intensity of Rivalry:
High
•  Polish companies are perceived of manufacturing lower quality good by German
customers
•  Significant customer loyalty to local and German manufacturer
•  price is a very sensitive topic, and especially for organizations with budget restraints
Bargaining Power of
Buyers: High
Threat of
Substitutes: Medium
•  The power of suppliers of standardized goods is low
•  Some suppliers may be pressed for exclusivity
Bargaining Power of
Suppliers: Medium
Complementary
Products: Weak
Small local and large global players in this industry
SMART playgrounds are being researched by incumbents
Offer high quality products as Germans are very quality and reputation conscious
In the German playground industry, wood is preferred compared to steel
Playground equipment manufacturers are selling equipment worldwide and may
transfer and apply learning benefits to the German market
Entertainment centres for kids, e.g. parks, water parks, playing indoor or outdoor,
malls, arcades
New toys and devices
No noteworthy complementary factors
•  Partners from trade fairs (November 2015 – indefinitely)
•  Partners from the construction industry (specifically Public-Private
Partnerships) (November 2015 – Indefinitely)
•  Municipalities & government entities (June 2016 - Indefinitely)
Contact:
Recommendations
•  CSR
•  Wooden playgrounds
Aditionally:
•  Email and call
•  Physical meeting
How:
Questionstopotentialpartners
Who do you supply most within the playground industry
(Schools, construction companies etc)?
Wer wird im Rahmen der Spielzeugindustrie am ehesten von
Ihnen versorgt? (Bsp. Schulen, Bauunternehmen etc.)?
Which regions do you supply most? Welche Regionen werden am meisten von Ihnen beliefert?
What are your distribution channels? Was umfasst Ihre Vertriebswege?
Could you give us an example of a project you are most
proud of?
Gibt es ein Projekt auf welches ihr Unternehmen besonders
stolz ist?
How many projects have you conducted in 2014 and
2015?
Wie viele Projekte hat Ihr Unternehmen im Jahr 2014 und
2015 durchgeführt?
How many installation teams do you have? Über wie viele Installationsteams verfügen Sie?
Could you explain what you expect from the partnership
with Vinciplay for the future?
Was erwarten Sie sich von der Partnerschaft mit Vinciplay
und was erhoffen Sie in der Zukunft zu erreichen?
What is the value added Vinciplay could bring to our
potential cooperation?
Welchen Mehrwert würde Vinciplay im Rahmen einer
möglichen Kooperation bringen?
PrivatePublicPartnership
Germany schools are seen to be long overdue with their renovations
Money is missing for schools to be renovated.
Due to ‘Public Private Partnership’ the renovations are made possible.
The experiment started in 2007, in Frankfurt, including 4 schools.
Hochtief, took the responsibility for the next 20 years, to be in charge of the building, renovating,
and investing 250 million euros.
In return for this, the city pays the company a 13 million Euros lease payment.
Construction company needs to guarantee quality for the next 20 years (Vinciplay even offering 30
years of quality guarantee)
UnitedStatesPhase 3 •  5+1 Porter’s analysis
•  recomendations
•  Barriers to entry are relatively low
•  There is no need of high initial investment nor difficulty in obtaining raw materials
or accessing distribution channels
Threat of New
Entrants: Medium
Intensity of Rivalry:
High
•  There is no significant treat that customers can affect the price of the products.
•  However since the products is quite similar to the ones offered by other companies
and it is try to differentiate this kind of products, the price can play some role
Bargaining Power of
Buyers: High
Threat of
Substitutes: Medium
•  There are many suppliers of raw materials for playgrounds equipment
•  Materials can be also shipped from other countries as some US companies already
practise
Bargaining Power of
Suppliers: Medium
Complementary
Products: Weak
Big and well-established players in the market
Strong rivalry is also visible in innovative solutions of those companies, as there are
customized products and playgrounds made of recyclable materials
Competition is even stronger for companies outside the US, since it seems that the
“Made in USA” claim is very welcome.
High pressures of safety standards of playgrounds.
Parks, water parks, playing indoor or outdoor, malls, arcades
Toys and new devices are indirect substitutes and may not cause playgrounds not
to be constructed, at least in the medium-term future in our assessment.
One can say that complementary factor for playgrounds equipment’s are the
number of green space in cities what depends on the decisions of city councils
•  Partners from trade fairs
•  Partners from the construction industry
•  Municipalities & government entities
Contact:
Recommendations
•  CSR
•  SMART playgrounds
•  Assembled in U.S.A.
Aditionally:
•  Email and call
•  Physical meeting
•  Warehouse (average cost 53,
815$ for 1000m2)
How:
Q&A

vinci play presentation

  • 1.
    A Case forFurther Internationalization
  • 2.
    • Company snapshot • Playground industryoverview • Market Identification • Final Selection • Recommendations PresentationOutline
  • 3.
    CompanySnapshot Legal name Babycam Internationaltrading name Vinciplay Employees 50 Year of founding 2009 Founder Pawel Chodkowski Managing Director Piotr Nadulne Head Offices Warsaw, Poland Production and Warehousing facilities Lowicz, Poland Exports to 15 countries References Skanska, Sheraton, Municipality of Radom, etc.
  • 4.
    Exclusivity agreements preferred by construction companies Strategic and economically interesting partners Contacts,trust and quality are important factors for manufacturers Niche and highly linked to the construction sector Cost-efficient players from countries with low- labor cost are increasingly eating away at incumbent players Long-term relationships Mature Industry PLAYGROUNDINDUSTRYOVERVIEW
  • 5.
    SWOT Analysis Strengths •  Low-Cost,high quality production •  Flexibility of organization •  Flexibility of entry-mode •  Can react relatively quickly to market trends •  Strong enough financial base to expand with an export-based or OEM model (assumed based on further int’l interest) Weaknesses •  Short market & business experience •  Low credibility •  Young, Polish company with, as of yet, little reputation •  Weak financial base relative to some established competitors •  SMART playground research still in idea phase Opportunities •  Numerous potential markets for expansion •  SMART playground technology •  Potential for OEM or other deals •  High client-reach with international playground conference/expo presence Threats •  Implementation of SMART playgrounds in the playground sector, Chinese low-cost, high-quality producers could compete with pirated or original products, Takeover threats by larger players
  • 6.
    ABorn-AgainGlobal According to Bell“well-established firms that have previously focused on their domestic markets, but which suddenly embrace rapid and dedicated internationalization", are known as ‘Born Again Globals’. 5 years in POLAND before market expansion Vinciplay’s foreign markets operations include: Austria, Spain, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Slovakia, UK, Netherlands, France, Luxembourg, Switzerland, Israel, Italy, Hungary, Russia Export-based entry model, low risk approach
  • 7.
    MarketIdentification Phase 1 •  Initialanalysis of 20 potential markets derived through group discussions based on Vinciplay’s past expansion efforts and attitudes and internationalization strategy of expanding into adjacent and nearby European countries Phase 2 •  Based on GDP, GDP from construction, inflation, housing index, business confidence and corporate tax rate, as well as geopolitical issues we narrowed down our potential market selection to 5 and compared the above metrics Phase 3 •  Further narrowing down our selection, we employed a PESTEL analysis, and were ultimately left with two potential markets for short- to medium-term expansion
  • 8.
    Phase 1 Phase2 Germany Sweden Switzerland China United States Latvia Lithuania Estonia Azerbaijan Russia Mexico Portugal Japan Turkey Kazakhstan Italy South Korea •  Germany •  Italy •  Turkey •  United States •  Estonia •  Lithuania •  Latvia
  • 9.
    Italy Politically stabile Eurozonecountry, has survived the economic crisis of 2008-2009 Corruption in Italy is always a potential issue From 2012 we can see good rising tendency in Italy’s GDP Corporate Taxation beneficial 27,5% in Italy versus 31,7% in Poland Very family focused and community is “importante” Environmental rules and regulations most focused on protecting historical ruins/UNESCO sites, which are everywhere in Italian cities. According to the Italian population pyramid for 2015 and 2020, 5-9 year olds are 2,2% of the population. +_
  • 10.
    Turkey The main advantageof Turkey is that their government provide policies on liberalisation. Turkey suffers from widespread corruption and bureaucratic system. According to the projection made by Goldman Sachs till 2050 this country is going to have 9th largest economy in the world +_ Had huge trade gap during last few years, but in 2015 Government manages to decrease it by 39.8 percent compared to year earlier. Turkey has growing proportion of young population and most families have more than 2 children in a family. The proportion of the population below age 15 in Turkey is one of the highest among OECD countries, 25.5 % There are some delays in the Turkish judicial system and in addition some judges who are politically influenced what can easily influence on results of some cases
  • 11.
    Baltics Incorporation law inLatvia, Lithuania and Estonia is constituted to be friendly and simply for entrepreneurs. An European Union members in 2005 +_ On the contrary Estonia has recently noted slowdown in economy. Favourable conditions for setting up business Baltics have flat rate tax systems and they are investors friendly For all three countries domestic demand will be the most important factor for the economy growth. Baltic’s populations are constantly shrinking Leading communications infrastructures provide excellent conditions to foreign entrepreneurs Fertility rate is still between the lowest in European Union
  • 12.
    USA Strong consumer andconstruction sector spending power and habit of constructing new buildings/complexes “Made in America”/”Buying American” important Interactive SMART playgrounds will most likely appear soon in the US and thus provide an opportunity/threat for Vinciplay +_ Upcoming Presidential election will have effect on infrastructure spending Cooperative, friendly Political/Trade Relationship between US-PL Cultural, psychological, geographical distances High investment cost Increasing focus on safety and quality
  • 13.
    Germany +_ Increases in publicinvestment in infrastructureEconomic activity has not been stable Business investments have disappointed The federal government has made EUR 600 million available for further urban development over the period 2014-2015 Since 2002 Germany has an aging population. The population will fall to 65 million people High standard of living and social security Largest population in the EU Germany and Poland having strong trading relations
  • 14.
    FirstwepaidattentiontocountryGDP,asthemostgeneralfeatureofeverycountry.Itgaveusabroadpicture ofhoweconomicallydevelopedtheyare. $17 419,00 $18010,00 $18 423,00 $22 000,00 $25 000,00 $3 853,00 $3 890,00 $3 978,00 $4 594,00 $8 248,00 $800,00 $807,00 $814,00 $942,00 $1 117,00 $2 144,34 $2 207,00 $2 224,00 $2 358,00 $3 396,00 $48,17 $48,31 $49,22 $58,44 $75,56 $31,92 $27,55 $27,16 $37,86 $47,75 $25,90 $24,50 $24,64 $30,93 $39,18 $1,00 $10,00 $100,00 $1 000,00 $10 000,00 $100 000,00 GDP 2014 (bill) Forecast about GDP in 2015 (bill) Forecast about GDP in Q3/2016(bill) Forecast about GDP in 2020(bill) Forecast about GDP in 2030( bill) GDP USA Germany Turkey Italy Lithuania Latvia Estonia
  • 15.
    After general overviewof these countries we decide to go deeper in this analyze. As Vinciplay’s representative told that they mostly work with constricting companies we decided that it will be important to pay attention not only to general GDP but also to GDP from contraction. $686,20 $713,54 $732,00 $763,48 $766,63 $27,22 $36,69 $32,42 $36,70 $40,12 $17,24 $16,91 $16,74 $17,29 $20,10 $0,18 $0,26 $0,27 $0,24 $0,24 $0,66 $0,73 $0,71 $0,78 $1,03 $0,10 $1,00 $10,00 $100,00 $1 000,00 GDP from constraction in Q1/2015 (bill.) Forecast about GDP from constraction in Q4/2015 (bill.) Forecast about GDP from constraction in Q3/2016 (bill.) Forecast about GDP from constraction in 2020 (bill.) Forecast about GDP from constraction in 2030 (bill.) GDP from construction USA Germany Italy Estonia Turkey
  • 16.
    Acomparisonofothereconomicalindicators -2,00% 0,00% 2,00% 4,00% 6,00% 8,00% 10,00% Inflation rate 2014 Forecast about Inflation rate Q4/2015 Forecast about Inflation rate Q3/2016 Forecast about Inflation rate 2020 Forecast about Inflation rate2030 Inflation rate USA Germany Turkey Italy Lithuania Latvia Estonia 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 Housing Index 2014 Forecast about Housing Index Q4/ 2015 Forecast about Housing Index Q3/16 Forecast about Housing Index 2020 Forecast about Housing Index 2030 House index USA Germany Turkey Italy Lithuania Latvia Estonia 0,00% 5,00% 10,00% 15,00% 20,00% 25,00% 30,00% 35,00% 40,00% 45,00% Corporate Tax Rate 2014 Forecast about Corporate Tax Rate Q4/2015 Forecast about Corporate Tax Rate Q3/2016 Forecast about Corporate Tax Rate 2020 Forecast about Corporate Tax Rate 2030 Corporate tax rate USA Germany Turkey Italy Lithuania Latvia Estonia
  • 17.
    GermanyPhase 3 •  5+1Porter’s analysis •  Recomendations •  Quastions to potential partners •  PPP
  • 18.
    •  Am lotof big players are active •  The new company needs a “German” profile •  The relative maturity of the playground market •  A niche market, which may hamper transparency and knowledge about operating Threat of New Entrants: Medium Intensity of Rivalry: High •  Polish companies are perceived of manufacturing lower quality good by German customers •  Significant customer loyalty to local and German manufacturer •  price is a very sensitive topic, and especially for organizations with budget restraints Bargaining Power of Buyers: High Threat of Substitutes: Medium •  The power of suppliers of standardized goods is low •  Some suppliers may be pressed for exclusivity Bargaining Power of Suppliers: Medium Complementary Products: Weak Small local and large global players in this industry SMART playgrounds are being researched by incumbents Offer high quality products as Germans are very quality and reputation conscious In the German playground industry, wood is preferred compared to steel Playground equipment manufacturers are selling equipment worldwide and may transfer and apply learning benefits to the German market Entertainment centres for kids, e.g. parks, water parks, playing indoor or outdoor, malls, arcades New toys and devices No noteworthy complementary factors
  • 19.
    •  Partners fromtrade fairs (November 2015 – indefinitely) •  Partners from the construction industry (specifically Public-Private Partnerships) (November 2015 – Indefinitely) •  Municipalities & government entities (June 2016 - Indefinitely) Contact: Recommendations •  CSR •  Wooden playgrounds Aditionally: •  Email and call •  Physical meeting How:
  • 20.
    Questionstopotentialpartners Who do yousupply most within the playground industry (Schools, construction companies etc)? Wer wird im Rahmen der Spielzeugindustrie am ehesten von Ihnen versorgt? (Bsp. Schulen, Bauunternehmen etc.)? Which regions do you supply most? Welche Regionen werden am meisten von Ihnen beliefert? What are your distribution channels? Was umfasst Ihre Vertriebswege? Could you give us an example of a project you are most proud of? Gibt es ein Projekt auf welches ihr Unternehmen besonders stolz ist? How many projects have you conducted in 2014 and 2015? Wie viele Projekte hat Ihr Unternehmen im Jahr 2014 und 2015 durchgeführt? How many installation teams do you have? Über wie viele Installationsteams verfügen Sie? Could you explain what you expect from the partnership with Vinciplay for the future? Was erwarten Sie sich von der Partnerschaft mit Vinciplay und was erhoffen Sie in der Zukunft zu erreichen? What is the value added Vinciplay could bring to our potential cooperation? Welchen Mehrwert würde Vinciplay im Rahmen einer möglichen Kooperation bringen?
  • 21.
    PrivatePublicPartnership Germany schools areseen to be long overdue with their renovations Money is missing for schools to be renovated. Due to ‘Public Private Partnership’ the renovations are made possible. The experiment started in 2007, in Frankfurt, including 4 schools. Hochtief, took the responsibility for the next 20 years, to be in charge of the building, renovating, and investing 250 million euros. In return for this, the city pays the company a 13 million Euros lease payment. Construction company needs to guarantee quality for the next 20 years (Vinciplay even offering 30 years of quality guarantee)
  • 22.
    UnitedStatesPhase 3 • 5+1 Porter’s analysis •  recomendations
  • 23.
    •  Barriers toentry are relatively low •  There is no need of high initial investment nor difficulty in obtaining raw materials or accessing distribution channels Threat of New Entrants: Medium Intensity of Rivalry: High •  There is no significant treat that customers can affect the price of the products. •  However since the products is quite similar to the ones offered by other companies and it is try to differentiate this kind of products, the price can play some role Bargaining Power of Buyers: High Threat of Substitutes: Medium •  There are many suppliers of raw materials for playgrounds equipment •  Materials can be also shipped from other countries as some US companies already practise Bargaining Power of Suppliers: Medium Complementary Products: Weak Big and well-established players in the market Strong rivalry is also visible in innovative solutions of those companies, as there are customized products and playgrounds made of recyclable materials Competition is even stronger for companies outside the US, since it seems that the “Made in USA” claim is very welcome. High pressures of safety standards of playgrounds. Parks, water parks, playing indoor or outdoor, malls, arcades Toys and new devices are indirect substitutes and may not cause playgrounds not to be constructed, at least in the medium-term future in our assessment. One can say that complementary factor for playgrounds equipment’s are the number of green space in cities what depends on the decisions of city councils
  • 24.
    •  Partners fromtrade fairs •  Partners from the construction industry •  Municipalities & government entities Contact: Recommendations •  CSR •  SMART playgrounds •  Assembled in U.S.A. Aditionally: •  Email and call •  Physical meeting •  Warehouse (average cost 53, 815$ for 1000m2) How:
  • 25.