NOVAGOLD exhibited and presented at the 2015 Cambridge House, Vancouver Resource Investment Conference. Thank you to everyone who visited our booth!

1. novagold.com
NYSE-MKT, TSX: NG | January 2015
Vancouver Resource Investment Conference 2015

2. cautionary statements
REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This presentation includes certain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of applicable securities laws, including the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All
statements, other than statements of historical fact, included herein including, without limitation, statements relating to Donlin Gold’s future operating or financial performance, are forward-
looking statements. Forward-looking statements are frequently, but not always, identified by words such as “plans”, “expects”, “anticipates”, “believes”, “intends”, “estimates”, “potential”,
“possible” and similar expressions, or statements that events, conditions or results “will”, “may”, “could”, or “should” occur or be achieved. These forward-looking statements are set forth in the
slides pertaining to the implementation of the Donlin Gold second updated Feasibility Study and pertaining to the implementation of the Galore Creek Pre-Feasibility Study, the factors that may
influence future gold price performance, and the potential future value of gold, and may include statements regarding perceived merit of properties; exploration results and budgets; mineral
reserves and resource estimates; work programs; capital expenditures; timelines; strategic plans; completion of transactions; market price of precious or base metals; or other statements that
are not statements of fact. Forward-looking statements involve various risks and uncertainties. There can be no assurance that such statements will prove to be accurate, and actual results and
future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations include the
uncertainties involving the need for additional financing to explore and develop properties and availability of financing in the debt and capital markets; uncertainties involved in the interpretation
of drilling results and geological tests and the estimation of reserves and resources; the need for continued cooperation between NOVAGOLD and Barrick Gold in the exploration and
development of the Donlin Gold property; the need for continued cooperation between NOVAGOLD and Teck Resources Ltd. in the exploration and development of the Galore Creek property;
the need for cooperation of government agencies and native groups in the development and operation of properties; the need to obtain permits and governmental approvals; risks of
construction and mining projects such as accidents, equipment breakdowns, bad weather, non-compliance with environmental and permit requirements, unanticipated variation in geological
structures, ore grades or recovery rates; unexpected cost increases; fluctuations in metal prices and currency exchange rates; and other risks and uncertainties disclosed in reports and
documents filed by NOVAGOLD with applicable securities regulatory authorities from time to time. The forward-looking statements made herein reflect our beliefs, opinions and projections on
the date the statements are made. Except as required by law, we assume no obligation to update the forward-looking statements of beliefs, opinions, projections, or other factors, should they
change.
REGARDING SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL INFORMATION
Unless otherwise indicated, all reserve and resource estimates included in this presentation have been prepared in accordance with Canadian National Instrument 43-101 Standards of
Disclosure for Mineral Projects (“NI 43-101”) and the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum Definition Standards for Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves (“CIM Definition
Standards”). Canadian standards, including NI 43-101, differ significantly from the requirements of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), and reserve and resource
information in this presentation may not be comparable to similar information disclosed by U.S. companies. In particular, and without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the term “resource”
does not equate to the term “‘reserves”. Under U.S. standards, mineralization may not be classified as a “reserve” unless the determination has been made that the mineralization could be
economically and legally produced or extracted at the time the reserve determination is made. At this time, both of Donlin Gold and Galore Creek projects are without known reserves, as
defined under SEC Industry Guide 7. The SEC’s disclosure standards normally do not permit the inclusion of information concerning “measured mineral resources”, “indicated mineral
resources” or “inferred mineral resources” or other descriptions of the amount of mineralization in mineral deposits that do not constitute “reserves” by U.S. standards in documents filed with the
SEC. U.S. investors should also understand that “inferred mineral resources” have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence and great uncertainty as to their economic and legal
feasibility. It cannot be assumed that all or any part of an “inferred mineral resource” will ever be upgraded to a higher category. Under Canadian rules, estimated “inferred mineral resources”
may not form the basis of feasibility or pre-feasibility studies except in rare cases. Investors are cautioned not to assume that all or any part of an “inferred mineral resource” exists or is
economically or legally mineable. Disclosure of “contained ounces” in a resource is permitted disclosure under Canadian regulations; however, the SEC normally only permits issuers to report
mineralization that does not constitute “reserves” by SEC standards as in-place tonnage and grade without reference to unit measures. The requirements of NI 43-101 for identification of
“reserves” are also not the same as those of the SEC, and reserves reported in compliance with NI 43-101 may not qualify as “reserves” under SEC standards. Accordingly, information
concerning mineral deposits set forth herein may not be comparable to information made public by companies that report in accordance with United States standards.
2
All dollar amounts quoted in this report are in U.S. currency unless otherwise noted.

3. DEVELOPMENT-STAGE COMPANY WITH PROJECTS OF EXCEPTIONAL SCALE,
QUALITY, AND JURISDICTIONAL SAFETY
who is NOVAGOLD?
DONLIN GOLD
GALORE CREEK
3
poised to become one of the
largest producers in the gold
industry
expected to be the largest and
lowest cost copper mine in
Canada
50% with Barrick
50% with Teck

4. NOVAGOLD’s strategy
4
CONTINUE TO EXECUTE AND DELIVER ON OUR BUSINESS PLAN
▶ Committed to gold through various market cycles
▶ Advance Donlin Gold through permitting to a construction decision
▶ Safeguard our cash position
▶ Monetize our 50% share of Galore Creek
▶ Maintain strong relationships with all stakeholders

5. ATTRIBUTES POSITION IT AMONG THE WORLD’S MOST SIGNIFICANT GOLD
DEPOSITS
donlin gold a large high-grade gold project
5
Notes:
1) Shown on 100% project basis, of which NOVAGOLD holds a 50% interest
2) Measured and indicated resources inclusive of proven and probable reserves.
See “Cautionary Note Concerning Reserve & Resource Estimates” and “Reserve & Resource
Base” with footnotes in the appendix.
RESERVES1
34million oz Proven & Probable
Grade: 2.1 g/t
RESOURCES1,2
39million oz Measured & Indicated
Grade: 2.2 g/t
6million oz Inferred
Grade: 2.0 g/t
(inclusive of P&P reserves)

6. A REMARKABLE RESOURCE AMONG EMERGING OPEN-PIT GOLD DEPOSITS
donlin gold has largest resource of its peer group
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
30.0
35.0
40.0
Donlin Gold Metates Livengood Rainy River Merian Haile
39.0
19.0
15.7
6.2
4.2 4.0
6
M&IGoldResource
(millionsofounces)
Notes:
• Peer group data as per latest company documents, public filings and websites. Comparison group based on large, gold-focused development projects where the majority of the M&I resource
is open-pit.
• Donlin Gold data as per the second updated feasibility study effective November 18, 2011, as amended January 20, 2012. Represents 100% of measured and indicated resources of which
NOVAGOLD’s share represents 50%. Measured and indicated resources inclusive of proven and probable reserves. See “Cautionary Note Concerning Reserve & Resource Estimates” and
“Reserve & Resource Base” with footnotes in the appendix.
• Newmont reports "Mineralized Material" as defined by SEC Industry Guide 7 for its Merian gold project as oppose to an "M&I Gold Resource" as defined by NI 43-101.
▸ Donlin Gold’s size and North American location distinguish
it from its peers
Location USA Mexico USA Canada Suriname USA
Owner(s) NOVAGOLD(50%)
Barrick (50%)
Chesapeake (100%) ITH Mines (100%) New Gold (100%) Newmont (75%)
Republic of Suriname (25%)
Romarco
(100%)

7. donlin gold emerging top-tier producer in safe
jurisdiction
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
1.20
1.40
1.60
Donlin Gold Metates Livengood Merian Rainy River Haile
1.102
0.76
0.58
0.40
0.33
0.13
1.501
Location USA Mexico USA Suriname Canada USA
Owner(s) NOVAGOLD(50%)
Barrick (50%)
Chesapeake (100%) ITH Mines (100%) Newmont (75%)
Republic of Suriname (25%)
New Gold
(100%)
Romarco (100%)
ProjectedAnnualGoldProduction
(millionsofounces)
THE LARGEST PROJECTED GOLD PRODUCER AMONG DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS
7
27 year mine life
1 million + ounces per year
Notes:
• Peer group data as per latest company documents, public filings and websites. Comparison group based on large, gold-focused development projects where the majority of the M&I
resource is open-pit.
• Donlin Gold data as per the second updated feasibility study effective November 18, 2011, as amended January 20, 2012. Represents 100% of measured and indicated resources of
which NOVAGOLD’s share represents 50%. Measured and indicated resources inclusive of proven and probable reserves. See “Cautionary Note Concerning Reserve & Resource
Estimates” and “Reserve & Resource Base” with footnotes in the appendix.
1. Projected annual gold production during first five full years of mine life;
2. Projected annual gold production during full life of mine.

8. 8
ONLY THREE PROJECTS IN THE WORLD ARE SLATED TO PRODUCE >1MOZ/YEAR
mines the size of donlin gold are scarce
Notes:
Donlin Gold projected annual production represents 100% of which NOVAGOLD’s share is 50%. All other production estimates, with the exception of Grasberg, are based on published 2014 average
gold annual production guidance sourced from SNL Metals & Mining. Grasberg represents the published 2014 gold sales guidance. Excludes Newmont’s Nevada operations that consist of multiple
mines. Analysis includes life of mine data for Donlin Gold.
1) If put into production as contemplated by the second updated feasibility study effective November 18, 2011, as amended January 20, 2012.
123 MINES
>100 Koz
13 MINES
>500 Koz
3 MINES
>800 Koz
3 MINES/
Projects
>1 Moz
GRASBERG
Indonesia
PUEBLO VIEJO
Dominican Republic
DONLIN GOLD
USA
▸ 1.5 Moz/year in first five full years1
▸ 1.1 Moz/year LOM1
1
Only undeveloped
asset in this category in
North America

9. AMONG VERY FEW LARGE HIGH-GRADE OPEN-PIT GOLD PROJECTS ON THE
HORIZON
donlin gold more than double the grade of the
average gold deposit in the world
9
Notes:
See “Cautionary Note Concerning Reserve & Resource Estimates” and “Reserve & Resource Base” with footnotes in the appendix.
1) Average grade of all deposits globally over 1 million ounces in size, sourced from “2013 Global Gold Mine and Deposit Rankings” – Natural Resource Holdings and
Visual Capitalist.
2) Donlin Gold data as per the second updated feasibility study effective November 18, 2011, as amended January 20, 2012. Represents 100% of measured and
indicated resources of which NOVAGOLD’s share is 50%. Measured and indicated resources are inclusive of proven and probable reserves.
World
Avg. Grade1:
1.01 g/t
Donlin Gold
Avg. Grade2:
2.2 g/t
Reserve grades continue to decline while
sources for emerging production to replace
mined-out capacity become increasingly
scarce

10. 0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
Donlin Gold Haile Merian Rainy River Livengood Metates
2.24
1.77
1.22
1.09
0.61
0.50
GRADE COMPARES WELL AMONG PEER GROUP OF EMERGING OPEN-PIT GOLD
DEPOSITS
donlin gold highest-quality open-pit development-
stage gold deposit
10
▸ With a high grade endowment, Donlin Gold is a unique project
better able to weather gold price cycles
M&IGoldGrade(g/t)
Notes:
• Peer group data as per latest company documents, public filings and websites. Comparison group based on large, gold-focused development projects where the majority of the M&I resource is
open-pit.
• Donlin Gold data as per the second updated feasibility study effective November 18, 2011, as amended January 20, 2012. Represents 100% of measured and indicated resources of which
NOVAGOLD’s share represents 50%. Measured and indicated resources inclusive of proven and probable reserves. See “Cautionary Note Concerning Reserve & Resource Estimates” and
“Reserve & Resource Base” with footnotes in the appendix.
• Newmont reports "Mineralized Material" as defined by SEC Industry Guide 7 for its Merian gold project as oppose to an "M&I Gold Resource" as defined by NI 43-101.
Location USA USA Suriname Canada USA Mexico
Owner(s) NOVAGOLD(50%)
Barrick (50%)
Romarco (100%) Newmont (75%)
Republic of Suriname (25%)
New Gold (100%) ITH Mines (100%) Chesapeake (100%)

11. MULTIPLE DRILL PROSPECTS AND TARGETS EXIST ALONG 8KM TREND
donlin gold substantial exploration potential
11
▶ Potential to expand current open-pit
resources along strike and at depth
▶ Good potential to discover meaningful
deposits outside current mine footprint
• Reserves and resources are contained
within just 3 km of an 8 km long trend
▶ Inferred mineral resource: 6 million ounces
of gold mainly inside the reserve pit
• Upside potential to project economics

12. NPV INCREASES ~20X WITH ~2X INCREASE IN GOLD PRICE
donlin gold has exceptional leverage to gold
▶ Project has a positive
return that increases
substantially with higher
gold prices
▶ Good payback at a
broad range of gold
prices
▶ Significant exploration
upside on the
mineralized trend
12
Notes:
Donlin Gold estimates as per the second updated feasibility study effective November 18, 2011, as amended January 20, 2012 . All dollar figures are in USD and reflect after-tax net present value (at a 0% and 5% discount
rates) of the Donlin Gold project as of 1/1/2014. At a 5% discount rate, the net present value is: $547 m @ $1,200 gold; $1,922m @ $1,350 gold; $3,147m @ $1,500 gold; $4,581 m @ $1,700 gold; $6,722 m @ $2,000 gold;
and $10,243 m @ $2,500 gold. Project development costs prior to 1/1/2014 are treated as sunk costs.
27year
mine life
NPV at 0%NPV at 5%

13. DEVELOPMENT TIMELINE OF NEW GOLD PROJECTS HAS MORE THAN DOUBLED
why donlin gold? project progressing as planned
13Notes:
Data sourced from SNL Metals & Mining.
1) Based on announced mining startup dates. Expansions and mine redevelopments are not included as they are not comparable with new mine developments.
27 mines
~8 years
discovery to production
57 mines
111 mines
~11 years
discovery to production
~18 years
discovery to production
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
AverageNumberofYearsfromDiscoverytoProduction
Startup Year
▸ Donlin Gold is well positioned to be shovel-ready when
sentiment turns

14. 0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
9,000
10,000
1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013
why gold? no new and substantial discoveries
14Notes:
Data as per SNL MEG’s MineSearch database, Company reports, SNL MEG estimates. Thomson Reuters. A gold discovery of 5 million ounces or
more is considered significant. Number of discoveries data not yet available for 2014.
NumberofGoldDiscoveries
Gold Discovered
Exploration Budget (US$M)
2012
highest year on
record for
exploration
spending and first
year in over two
decades with no
discoveries
DESPITE RECORD HIGH EXPLORATION SPENDING LEVELS THE GOLD INDUSTRY
HAS EXPERIENCED A RECENT DROP IN DISCOVERIES

15. Donlin Gold located in Alaska, one of
the safest jurisdictions in the world with
history of successful mine development
ALASKA A RESOURCE-RICH STATE WITH AN ESTABLISHED RULE OF LAW
donlin gold located in a favorable jurisdiction
▶ Alaska is the second largest U.S.
gold-producing State
▶ Well-defined permitting process
▶ Natural resource projects integral
to the State’s economy
▶ Strong and time-tested community
support
15

16. STRONG AND TIME-HONORED RELATIONSHIPS WITH STAKEHOLDERS
16
donlin gold durable, long-term agreements with
native corporations
Donlin Gold has the support of the land owners through a 20+ year relationship
“Calista and TKC are not only stakeholders, but are
the legislatively mandated landowners charged
with the responsibility of seeing the project to
fruition in an environmentally responsible manner.”
– June MacAtee, Vice President of Calista Corporation
(mineral owner)
"Since 1995, Donlin Gold has worked constructively in
our region and I know our partnership will benefit our
shareholders for many generations. Today's agreement
sets the basis for a long and productive relationship
that with construction of the mine will provide jobs and
financial value to the shareholders in our 10 villages.”
– Maver Carey, President & CEO of
The Kuskokwim Corporation (surface owner)

17. donlin gold project permitting is on track
17
1.5Moz/year
first five full years1
1.1Moz/year
life of mine1
16 years ̴ 4 27+ years
EXPLORATION&
ENVIRONMENTAL
STUDIES
PERMITTING
ENGINEERING&
CONSTRUCTION
OPERATION
WE ARE HERE
HALF WAY THROUGH PERMITTING
1.5Moz/year
first five full years1
1.1Moz/year
life of mine1
̴ 4
Notes:
1) Donlin Gold data as per the second updated feasibility study. Projected average annual production represents 100% of which NOVAGOLD’s share represents 50%.
DEVELOPMENT TIMELINE - ADVANCING TOWARD A CONSTRUCTION DECISION
Federal and State agencies are working cooperatively,
with day-to-day support from Donlin Gold,
to efficiently move the project through the EIS and permitting processes.

18. THE KIND OF ASSET YOU CAN BUILD A COMPANY AROUND
galore creek a significant copper-gold-silver asset
in canada
18
Notes:
1) Represents 100% of measured and indicated resources of which NOVAGOLD’s share is
50%. Measured and indicated resources inclusive of proven and probable reserves.
See “Cautionary Note Concerning Reserve & Resource Estimates” and “Reserve & Resource
Base” with footnotes in the appendix.
9billion lbs
Grade: 0.5%
8million oz
Grade: 0.3 g/t
136 million oz
Grade: 5.2 g/t
copper
gold
silver
M&I Resources1

19. NOVAGOLD
focused on execution and
delivery of our business plan
NOVAGOLD highlights
19
Safest Leverage to Gold:
Alaska and British Columbia,
top-rated mining jurisdictions
Accomplished Team:
185 years cumulative
experience
Prolific Production Profile:
Donlin Gold expected to be one of
industry’s top producing assets
Supportive Stakeholders:
Long standing shareholders and
engaged local partners
Strong Balance Sheet:
$171m cash + term deposits
as of August 31, 2014
Top Tier Assets:
Industry’s leading mineral
endowments

20. novagold.com
appendix

21. ▶ Donlin Gold LLC is the operating company
▶ 50/50 ownership by NOVAGOLD and Barrick Gold
▶ Board of Directors has two representatives from each company
• Chairman rotates every year
• Each company has the right to appoint the Donlin Gold General Manager every
two years
▶ Operates under agreements with Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (ANCSA)
landowners
• Calista Corporation (Subsurface minerals and surface lease)
• The Kuskokwim Corporation (Surface use agreement)
▶ Project office in Anchorage
• 36 full-time employees and 2 contractors
▶ Strong track record for local hiring
ADVANCING DONLIN GOLD UP THE VALUE CHAIN
donlin gold project overview
21

22. DONLIN GOLD SLATED TO BE A STATE-OF-THE-ART SIGNIFICANT MINE
donlin gold project highlights
22
Reserves: 33.9 Moz Au (505M tonnes ore)1
Resources: 5.1 Moz M&I (excluding P&P) and 6.0 Moz Inferred1
Mine Life: ~27 years
Production: Year 1-5,1.5 Moz/year; LOM,1.1 Moz/year
Operation: Open-pit, conventional truck & shovel
Milling: 53.5k tonnes/day, sulfide flotation, pressure
oxidation (POX), carbon-in-leach recovery (CIL)
Strip ratio: 5.5 = 2.8B tonnes waste rock
Tailings: Fully lined storage facility
Power: 153MW average site-generated load, fueled by natural gas
transported via a 315-mile pipeline
Logistics: All consumables supplied by Kuskokwim River transportation
system with port near Jungjuk Creek
See “Cautionary Note Concerning Reserve & Resource Estimates” and “Reserve and Resource Base” table with footnotes.

23. donlin gold expected to provide three decades of
low cost production
LOW OPERATING CASH COSTS AND ALL-IN SUSTAINING COSTS
23
Open-pit mining2 270
Processing 257
G&A, royalties, land & other3 108
Total $635
Open-pit mining2 133
Processing 208
G&A, royalties, land & other3 70
Total $411
Cash Costs1 Per Ounce
First Five Years
Notes:
Donlin Gold estimates as per the second updated feasibility study effective November 18, 2011, as amended January 20, 2012.
US GAAP cost of sales, excluding depreciation and reclamation
1) Net of deferred costs
2) Based on US$1,200/oz gold price
All-in Sustaining Costs Per Ounce
Cash costs1 635
Sustaining capex 50
Corporate administration 28
Reclamation 22
Total $735
Cash costs1 411
Sustaining capex 83
Corporate administration 21
Reclamation 17
Total $532
Life of Mine
Cash Costs1 Per Ounce
All-in Sustaining Costs Per Ounce

24. donlin gold
WELL POSITIONED TO SHARE UPFRONT COSTS WITH THIRD PARTIES
Areas US$M1 Opportunities1
Mining 345 Leasing equipment ~$170M
Site preparation/roads 236
Process facilities 1,326 Oxygen plant could be built by third party ~$130M
Tailings 120
Utilities 1,302
Ancillary buildings 304
Off-site facilities 243
Total Direct Costs 3,876
Owners’ cost 414
Indirect Costs 1,405
Contingency 984 Healthy Contingency
Total Owner’s & Indirect
Costs, and Contingency
2,803
Total Project Cost 6,679 >$1B potential initial capital reductions
Gas pipeline could be built by third party $834M
1) Represents 100% of project’s capital expenditures 24

25. ROBUST ECONOMICS HIGHLY LEVERAGED TO GOLD PRICES
donlin gold key performance indicators
25
Gold Price
Unit $1,000/oz $1,200/oz
Base Case
$1,700/oz $2,000/oz $2,500/oz
Average annual
after-tax cash flow
(first full five years)
$M 670 950 1,500 1,785 2,185
Average annual
after-tax cash flow (LOM)
$M 350 500 815 990 1,275
NPV (5%) after-tax1 $M (1,340) 550 4,580 6,720 10,240
NPV (0%) after-tax1 $M 2,100 6,200 14,620 19,250 26,975
IRR after-tax1 % 2.3 6.0 12.3 15.1 19.1
Payback period Years 19.1 9.2 5.3 4.4 3.5
Notes:
Donlin Gold estimates as per the second updated feasibility study effective November 18, 2011, as amended January 20, 2012. All dollar figures are in USD and reflect after-tax net present value (at a 0% and 5% discount
rates) of the Donlin Gold Project as of 1/1/2014. Project development costs prior to that date are treated as sunk costs.
All amounts in US dollars
1) NPVs and IRRs as at January 1, 2014. Project development costs prior to that date are treated as sunk costs.

26. PROCEEDING ON SCHEDULE AS PER EIS TIMELINE
donlin gold current work
▶ Maintaining strong working relationships with the agencies and providing input
throughout the permitting and EIS processes
▶ EIS process and current activities
• Alternatives development addressing mine, pipeline and transportation
components was completed in Q1 2014
• PDEIS well underway, initial drafts of baseline conditions and analysis of
impacts underway
• Draft EIS anticipated mid-year 2015
▶ Major permit application submittals and agency reviews – well underway
• Air quality
• Water discharge and usage
• Pipeline plan of development
• Wetlands
• Dam safety
26

27. LARGE PROJECTS HAVE BEEN SUCCESSFULLY PERMITTED
permitting in the U.S.
27
Project Name Location Metal Time Description
Red Dog Alaska Lead/zinc ~2 years
• Expansion
• EIS completed in 2009
• Development started on schedule in 2010
Fort Knox Alaska Gold ~3 years
• Expansion – new heap leach facility
• Permitting completed in 2007
Pogo Alaska Gold ~3 years
• New mine
• Permitting completed in 2004
• Operations began in 2006
Arturo Nevada Gold ~4 years
• Major pit expansion
• New waste rock and heap leach facilities
• EIS/ROD completed in May 2014
Rochester Nevada Silver ~1 year
• Expansion – new heap leach & mine reopening
• EA/permitting completed in 2011
Cortez Nevada Gold ~3 years
• Major pit expansion
• EIS/permitting completed in 2008/2009
Goldstrike Nevada Gold ~2 years
• Major pit expansion
• Waste rock and tailings facilities
• ROD approving the project was in 2009
Hycroft Nevada Gold ~2 years
• Reactivation
• EIS/permitting completed in 2012
Long Canyon Nevada Gold
~3 years
(anticipated)
• New pit, heap leach, mill and tailings facility
• Final EIS approved by BLM, under 30-day review
Pan Nevada Gold ~2 years
• New open pit and heap leach
• EIS/permitting completed in 2013
NorthMet Minnesota Copper/nickel/cobalt
~12 years
(anticipated)
• New open pit
• Final EIS and Record of Decision anticipated in the first half 2015
Haile South Carolina Gold
~4 years
(anticipated)
• New mine on historic property
• Open pits, processing and tailings facilities
• Final EIS issued July 2014, ROD issued October 2014

28. GALORE CREEK, AN EXCEPTIONAL ASSET
galore creek project overview
28
▶ Galore Creek Mining Corporation (GCMC) is the operating company
▸ 50/50 ownership by NOVAGOLD and Teck Resources Inc.
▸ Management Committee has two representatives from each company
• Chairman rotates every year
▸ Project is located within the Tahltan Nation Territory and operates under a
Participation Agreement
▸ All mineral claims are on Crown land
▸ Project office in Vancouver
• Abundance of technical strength to draw from within Teck
▸ Strong track record for Tahltan hiring at project site as well as contracting and
procurement with Tahltan businesses and joint ventures

29. GALORE CREEK TO BE ONE OF CANADA’S LARGEST COPPER MINES
galore creek project highlights
29
Reserves: 6.8 Blb Cu; 5.5 Moz Au; 102 Moz Ag 1
Resources: 8.9 Blb Cu; 8.0 Moz Au; 136 Moz Ag (inclusive of reserves) 1
Mine Life: ~18 years
Production: Year 1-5, 400 Mlb/year Cu; LOM, 340 Mlb/year Cu
Operation: Open-pit, conventional truck & shovel
Milling: +80k tonnes/day, conventional crush, grind, and Cu/Au/Ag flotation
concentration, plant located in West More Valley
Strip ratio: 2.2 = 1.1B tonnes waste rock
Tailings: storage facility located in West More Valley next to plant
Power: BC Hydro’s Northwest Transmission Line is now in service
connecting from near Terrace, BC to Bob Quinn to promote remote
industrial development, Galore Creek to tie into the NTL
Logistics: Port facilities to be built near Stewart, BC
Notes:
See “Cautionary Note Concerning Reserve & Resource Estimates” and “Reserve and Resource Base” table with footnotes.

30. ROBUST ECONOMICS HIGHLY LEVERAGED TO METAL PRICES
galore creek key performance indicators
30
Unit Metal Prices
Copper
Gold
Silver
US$/lb
US$/oz
US$/oz
2.00
900
15.00
2.65
1,100
18.50
3.00
1,100
20.00
3.50
1,200
25.00
4.00
1,300
30.00
LOM after-tax cash flow $M 1,514 5,118 6,641 9,223 11,812
NPV (5%) after-tax1 $M (969) 988 1,794 3,134 4,458
NPV (7%) after-tax1 $M (1,431) 137 778 1,837 2,877
IRR after-tax1 % 2.4 7.4 9.2 11.9 14.3
Payback period Years 13.2 7.8 6.1 4.1 3.3
Notes:
Galore Creek estimates as per the 2011 Pre-Feasibility Study. All dollar figures are in CAD. See “Cautionary Note Concerning Reserve & Resource Estimates” and
“Reserve & Resource Base” with footnotes in the appendix.
1) NPVs and IRRs as of two years prior to significant project spend. Project development costs prior to that point are treated as sunk costs.
All amounts in CAD dollars

31. INDUSTRY LEADERS TO BRING DONLIN GOLD THROUGH PERMITTING & BEYOND
the NOVAGOLD team
31
Gregory Lang
President & CEO
▸ Former President of Barrick Gold North America
▸ 35 years experience building & operating major mines
▸ Intimate knowledge of Donlin Gold
David Deisley
Executive Vice President and
General Counsel
▸ Former EVP and General Counsel of Goldcorp
▸ Regional General Counsel for Barrick Gold North America
▸ Extensive track record in project permitting, corporate social responsibility,
mergers and acquisitions and corporate development
▸ 25 years of mining industry experience
David Ottewell
Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer
▸ Former VP and Corporate Controller of Newmont Mining Corporation
▸ 25 years of mining industry experience
▸ Diverse experience in all facets of financial management, from mine operations
to executive corporate financial management of premier gold producers
Mélanie Hennessey
Vice President, Corporate
Communications
▸ Held variety of executive and senior IR & corporate communications positions
with Goldcorp, New Gold, and Hecla Mining Company
▸ Leading NOVAGOLD’s internal and external communications functions
Ron Rimelman
Vice President, Environment,
Health, Safety & Sustainability
▸ 25+ years of environmental experience, managing environmental impact
assessments and permitting activities world-wide
▸ Leadership role on mine permitting and NEPA evaluations for mine projects in
Alaska since 1993
Richard Williams
Vice President, Engineering
and Development
▸ Former Project Director for the Pueblo Viejo project in the Dominican Republic
▸ 30 years of experience developing and operating major mines world-wide
▸ Particular expertise in autoclave technology
MANAGEMENT

32. NOVAGOLD board of directors
32
Dr. Thomas Kaplan
Chairman
Chairman and CIO of The Electrum Group LLC, a privately held natural resources
investor that controls a diversified portfolio of precious and base metals assets
Sharon Dowdall
Former Chief Legal Officer and Corporate Secretary with Franco-Nevada, transforming an
industry pioneer into one of the most successful precious metals enterprises in the world
Dr. Marc Faber
Publishes a monthly investment newsletter entitled The Gloom, Boom & Doom
Report and is the author of several books
Greg Lang
President & CEO
Former President of Barrick Gold North America, 35 years experience building &
operating major mines with intimate knowledge of Donlin Gold
Gil Leathley
COO and Director of Sunward Resources, former Senior Vice President and Chief
Operating Officer of the Company
Igor Levental
President of The Electrum Group LLC, former VP of Homestake Mining and International
Corona Corp.
Kalidas Madhavpeddi Former Executive with Phelps Dodge
Gerald McConnell Former Chairman and CEO of NOVAGOLD, CEO of Namibia Rare Earths Inc.
Clynton Nauman CEO of Alexco Resources, formerly with Viceroy Gold and Kennecott Minerals
Rick Van Nieuwenhuyse CEO of NovaCopper, founder and former CEO of NOVAGOLD
Anthony Walsh
Former President and Chief Executive Officer of Miramar Mining Corporation, which in
2007 was sold to Newmont Mining Corporation.

33. COPPER
Tonnage
Mt
Grade*
%Cu
Metal content
Mlbs
NOVAGOLD share**
Mlbs
Reserves (100%)2
Proven 69.0 0.61 900.0 450.0
Probable 459.1 0.58 5,900.0 2,950.0
P&P 528.0 0.59 6,800.0 3,400.0
Resources (100%)4 inclusive of reserves
Measured 108.4 0.48 1,147.0 573.5
Indicated 706.3 0.50 7,786.0 3,893.0
M&I 814.7 0.50 8,933.0 4,466.5
Inferred 346.6 0.42 3,230.0 1,615.0
GOLD
Mt g/t Moz Moz
Reserves (100%)2
Proven 69.0 0.52 1.15 0.58
Probable 459.1 0.29 4.30 2.15
P&P 528.0 0.32 5.45 2.73
Resources (100%)4 inclusive of reserves
Measured 108.4 0.48 1.70 0.85
Indicated 706.3 0.28 6.40 3.20
M&I 814.7 0.31 8.00 4.00
Inferred 346.6 0.24 2.70 1.35
SILVER
Mt g/t Moz Moz
Reserves (100%)2
Proven 69.0 4.94 11.0 5.5
Probable 459.1 6.18 91.2 45.6
P&P 528.0 6.02 102.2 51.1
Resources (100%)4 inclusive of reserves
Measured 108.4 4.10 14.30 7.15
Indicated 706.3 5.38 122.10 61.05
M&I 814.7 5.21 136.40 68.20
Inferred 346.6 4.28 47.73 23.87
At April 30, 2012
Donlin Gold (NOVAGOLD 50%)
Galore Creek (NOVAGOLD 50%)
GOLD
Tonnage
Mt
Grade*
g/t
Metal content
Moz
NOVAGOLD share**
Moz
Reserves (100%)1
Proven 7.7 2.32 0.57 0.29
Probable 497.1 2.08 33.28 16.64
P&P 504.8 2.09 33.85 16.93
Resources (100%)3 inclusive of reserves
Measured 7.7 2.52 0.63 0.31
Indicated 533.6 2.24 38.38 19.19
M&I 541.3 2.24 39.01 19.50
Inferred 92.2 2.02 5.99 3.00
NOVAGOLD reserve/resource table
33

34. reserve/resource table (con’t)
Resources (100%)5,6 Tonnage Grade* Metal content NOVAGOLD share**
COPPER Mt %Cu Mlbs Mlbs
Inferred 53.7 0.50 592.0 414.4
GOLD Mt g/t Moz Moz
Inferred 53.7 0.73 1.26 0.88
SILVER Mt g/t Moz Moz
Inferred 53.7 10.60 18.36 12.85
Copper Canyon (NOVAGOLD 70%)
t = metric tonne
M = million
g/t = grams/tonne
* Reserve grade is diluted; resource
grade is in situ.
** NOVAGOLD share net after earn-ins
Approximate cut-off grades (see Resource Footnotes below):
Donlin Gold Reserves1: 0.57 g/t gold
Resources3: 0.46 g/t gold
Galore Creek Reserves2: C$10.08 NSR
Resources4: C$10.08 NSR
Copper Canyon Resources5,6: 0.6% copper equivalent
34

35. Notes:
a. These resource estimates have been prepared in accordance with NI43-101 and the CIM Definition Standard, unless otherwise noted.
b. See numbered footnotes below on resource information.
c. Rounding as required by reporting guidelines may result in apparent summation differences between tonnes, grade and contained metal content
d. Tonnage and grade measurements are in metric units. Contained gold and silver ounces are reported as troy ounces, contained copper pounds as imperial pounds
Resource Footnotes:
Mineral Reserves are contained within Measured and Indicated pit designs, and supported by a mine plan, featuring variable throughput rates, stockpiling and cut-off optimization. The pit designs and mine plan were optimized on diluted grades using the following economic and technical parameters: Metal price for
gold of US$975/oz; reference mining cost of US$1.67/t incremented US$0.0031/t/m with depth from the 220 m elevation (equates to an average mining cost of US$2.14/t), variable processing cost based on the formula 2.1874 x (S%) + 10.65 for each US$/t processed; general and administrative cost of US$2.27/t
processed; stockpile rehandle costs of US$0.19/t processed assuming that 45% of mill feed is rehandled; variable recoveries by rock type, ranging from 86.66% in shale to 94.17% in intrusive rocks in the Akivik domain; refining and freight charges of US$1.78/oz gold; royalty considerations of 4.5%; and variable pit
slope angles, ranging from 23º to 43º. Mineral Reserves are reported using an optimized net sales return value based on the following equation: Net Sales Return = Au grade * Recovery * (US$975/oz – (1.78 + (US$975/oz – 1.78) * 0.045)) - (10.65 + 2.1874 * (S%) + 2.27 + 0.19) and reported in US$/tonne. Assuming
an average recovery of 89.54% and an average S% grade of 1.07%, the marginal gold cutoff grade would be approximately 0.57 g/t, or the gold grade that would equate to a 0.001 NSR cutoff at these same values. The life of mine strip ratio is 5.48. The assumed life-of-mine throughput rate is 53.5 kt/d.
Mineral Reserves are contained within Measured and Indicated pit designs using metal prices for copper, gold and silver of US$2.50/lb, US$1,050/oz, and US$16.85/oz, respectively. Appropriate mining costs, processing costs, metal recoveries and inter ramp pit slope angles varing from 42º to 55º were used to
generate the pit phase designs. Mineral Reserves have been calculated using a 'cashflow grade' ($NSR/SAG mill hr) cut-off which was varied from year to year to optimize NPV. The net smelter return (NSR) was calculated as follows: NSR = Recoverable Revenue – TCRC (on a per tonne basis), where: NSR = Net
Smelter Return; TCRC = Transportation and Refining Costs; Recoverable Revenue = Revenue in Canadian dollars for recoverable copper, recoverable gold, and recoverable silver using metal prices of US$2.50/lb, US$1,050/oz, and US$16.85/oz for copper, gold, and silver, respectively, at an exchange rate of
CDN$1.1 to US$1.0; Cu Recovery = Recovery for copper based on mineral zone and total copper grade; for Mineral Reserves this NSR calculation includes mining dilution. SAG throughputs were modeled by correlation with alteration types. Cash flow grades were calculated as the product of NSR value in $/t and
throughput in t/hr. The life of mine strip ratio is 2.16.
Mineral Resources are contained within a conceptual Measured, Indicated and Inferred optimized pit shell using the following assumptions: gold price of US$1,200/oz; variable process cost based on 2.1874 * (sulphur grade) + 10.6485; administration cost of US$2.29/t; refining, freight & marketing (selling costs) of
US$1.85/oz recovered; stockpile rehandle costs of US$0.20/t processed assuming that 45% of mill feed is rehandled; variable royalty rate, based on royalty of 4.5% * (Au price – selling cost). Mineral Resources have been estimated using a constant Net Sales Return cut-off of US$0.001/t milled. The Net Sales Return
was calculated using the formula: Net Sales Return = Au grade * Recovery * (US$1200/oz – (1.85 + ((US$1200/oz – 1.85) * 0.045)) - (10.65 + 2.1874 * (S%) + 2.29 + 0.20)) and reported in US$/tonne. Mineral Resources are inclusive of Mineral Reserves. Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have
demonstrated economic viability. Inferred Resources are in addition to Measured and Indicated Resources. Inferred Resources have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence and whether they can be mined legally or economically. It cannot be assumed that all or any part of the Inferred Resources will ever
be upgraded to a higher category. See "Cautionary Note Concerning Reserve & Resource Estimates".
Mineral resources are contained within a conceptual Measured, Indicated and Inferred optimized pit shell using the same economic and technical parameters as used for Mineral Reserves. Tonnages are assigned based on proportion of the block below topography. The overburden/bedrock boundary has been
assigned on a whole block basis. Mineral resources have been estimated using a constant NSR cut-off of C$10.08/t milled. The Net Smelter Return (NSR) was calculated as follows: NSR = Recoverable Revenue – TCRC (on a per tonne basis), where: NSR = Diluted Net Smelter Return; TCRC = Transportation and
Refining Costs; Recoverable Revenue = Revenue in Canadian dollars for recoverable copper, recoverable gold, and recoverable silver using silver using the economic and technical parameters mentioned above. The mineral resource includes material within the conceptual M,I&I pit that is not scheduled for processing
in the mine plan but is above cutoff. Mineral Resources are inclusive of Mineral Reserves. Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. Inferred Resources are in addition to Measured and Indicated Resources. Inferred Resources have a great amount of uncertainty
as to their existence and whether they can be mined legally or economically. It cannot be assumed that all or any part of the Inferred Resources will ever be upgraded to a higher category. See "Cautionary Note Concerning Reserve & Resource Estimates".
The copper-equivalent grade was calculated as follows: CuEq = Recoverable Revenue ÷ 2204.62 * 100 ÷ 1.55. Where: CuEq = Copper equivalent grade; Recoverable Revenue = Revenue in US dollars for recoverable copper, recoverable gold and recoverable silver using metal prices of US$1.55/lb, US$650/oz, and
US$11/oz for copper, gold, and silver, respectively; for the purposes of the equivalency formula, Cu Recovery is assumed to be 100%. Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. Inferred Resources are in addition to Measured and Indicated Resources. Inferred
Resources have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence and whether they can be mined legally or economically. It cannot be assumed that all or any part of the Inferred Resources will ever be upgraded to a higher category. See "Cautionary Note Concerning Reserve & Resource Estimates".
NOVAGOLD Canada Inc. has agreed to transfer its 60% joint venture interest in the Copper Canyon property to the Galore Creek Partnership, which is equally owned by NOVAGOLD Canada Inc. and a subsidiary of Teck Resources Limited. The remaining 40% joint venture interest in the Copper Canyon property is
owned by another wholly owned subsidiary of NOVAGOLD.
Cautionary Note Concerning Reserve & Resource Estimates
This summary table uses the term “resources”, “measured resources”, “indicated resources” and “inferred resources”. United States investors are advised that, while such terms are recognized and required by Canadian securities laws, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) does not
recognize them. Under United States standards, mineralization may not be classified as a “reserve” unless the determination has been made that the mineralization could be economically and legally produced or extracted at the time the reserve determination is made. Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves
do not have demonstrated economic viability. United States investors are cautioned not to assume that all or any part of measured or indicated resources will ever be converted into reserves. Further, inferred resources have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence and as to whether they can be mined
legally or economically. It cannot be assumed that all or any part of the inferred resources will ever be upgraded to a higher category. Therefore, United States investors are also cautioned not to assume that all or any part of the inferred resources exist, or that they can be mined legally or economically. Disclosure of
“contained ounces” is permitted disclosure under Canadian regulations, however, the SEC normally only permits issuers to report “resources” as in place tonnage and grade without reference to unit measures. Accordingly, information concerning descriptions of mineralization and resources contained in this release
may not be comparable to information made public by United States companies subject to the reporting and disclosure requirements of the SEC.
NI 43-101 is a rule developed by the Canadian Securities Administrators, which established standards for all public disclosure an issuer makes of scientific and technical information concerning mineral projects. Unless otherwise indicated, all resource estimates contained in this circular have been prepared in
accordance with NI 43-101 and the CIM Definition Standards.
Technical Reports and Qualified Persons
The documents referenced below provide supporting technical information for each of NOVAGOLD's projects.
Project Qualified Person(s) Most Recent Disclosure & Filing Date
Donlin Gold Tony Lipiec, P. Eng., AMEC Donlin Creek Gold Project
Gordon Seibel R.M. SME, AMEC Alaska, USA
Kirk Hanson P.E., AMEC NI 43-101 Technical Report on Second Updated Feasibility Study amended filing on January 23, 2012
Galore Creek Robert Gill, P.Eng., AMEC Galore Creek Copper–Gold Project,
Jay Melnyk, P.Eng., AMEC British Columbia, NI 43-101 Technical Report on Pre-Feasibility Study,
Greg Kulla, P.Geo., AMEC filed on September 12, 2011
Greg Wortman, P.Eng., AMEC
Dana Rogers, P.Eng., Lemley International
Heather White, B.Sc., P.Eng., who is a consultant to NOVAGOLD and a “qualified person” under NI 43-101, has approved the scientific and technical information included in this section related to: (i) Donlin Gold since the issuance of the technical report filed on January 23, 2012, and (ii) Galore Creek since the
issuance of the technical report filed on September 12, 2011.
reserve/resource table (con’t)
35

36. 36
NOVAGOLD RESOURCES INC.
Suite 720 – 789 West Pender Street
Vancouver, BC
Canada V6C 1H2
T 604 669 6227 TF 1 866 669 6227 F 604 669 6272
www.novagold.com
info@novagold.com
Mélanie Hennessey
VP, Corporate Communications
melanie.hennessey@novagold.com
Erin O’Toole
Analyst, Investor Relations
erin.otoole@novagold.com
contact us