A presentation regarding Quo Warranto, the contents are: nature and purpose, grounds, who may commenced, where can be filed, the case of the former Chief justice Ma. Lourdes Sereno as she was removed by virtue of a quo warranto.
BIA Remands of Immigration Judge V. Stuart Couch from 01/01/2014 to 05/26/2016Bryan Johnson
EOIR FOIA ID # 2016-23184. Also, see acknowledgment letter at following link: http://www.slideshare.net/abogadobryan/eoir-acknowledgment-letter-for-201623284
A presentation regarding Quo Warranto, the contents are: nature and purpose, grounds, who may commenced, where can be filed, the case of the former Chief justice Ma. Lourdes Sereno as she was removed by virtue of a quo warranto.
BIA Remands of Immigration Judge V. Stuart Couch from 01/01/2014 to 05/26/2016Bryan Johnson
EOIR FOIA ID # 2016-23184. Also, see acknowledgment letter at following link: http://www.slideshare.net/abogadobryan/eoir-acknowledgment-letter-for-201623284
Webinar | Texas vs. United States - The Repeal of ACA?benefitexpress
Recently a Federal District Court held in Texas, et al. v. United States of America, et al. that the individual mandate in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) is unconstitutional, and that the other provisions in the ACA are invalid because they are inseverable from the individual mandate.
Our ACA compliance webinar reviews:
- What the Federal District Court decided.
- The basis for the decision.
- The impact of the decision.
- What may happen over the next months or year.
- What Congress may do to address the situation.
649 F.3d 1086United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit..docxalinainglis
649 F.3d 1086
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Melchor GUEVARA, Petitioner,
v.
Eric H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 08–72252.Argued and Submitted Feb. 2, 2010.Filed June 3, 2011.
Synopsis
Background: Alien petitioned for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), which reversed the immigration judge's (IJ's) decision to grant alien cancellation of removal based on purported legal permanent resident (LPR) status arising from prior approval of his request for employment authorization.
Holdings: The Court of Appeals, N.R. Smith, Circuit Judge, held that:
1 court would apply limited Skidmore framework in reviewing BIA's decision;
2 prior grant of employment authorization did not grant alien LPR status; and
3 employment authorization was not equivalent to participation in Family Unity Program (FUP).
Petition denied.
Fisher, Circuit Judge, dissented and filed opinion.
West Headnotes (7)
Collapse West Headnotes
Change View
1
Administrative Law and ProcedureAliens, immigration, and citizenship
Aliens, Immigration, and CitizenshipLaw questions
Court of Appeals reviews de novo the determinations of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) of purely legal questions, including the BIA's interpretation of the Immigration and Nationality Act. Immigration and Nationality Act, § 101 et seq., 8 U.S.C.A. § 1101 et seq.
2
Administrative Law and ProcedureAliens, immigration, and citizenship
Aliens, Immigration, and CitizenshipLaw questions
Court of Appeals applies Chevron deference to the interpretations of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) as to ambiguous immigration statutes, if the BIA's decision is a published decision; however, the court need not defer to the BIA if the statute is unambiguous.
1 Case that cites this headnote
3
Administrative Law and ProcedureAliens, immigration, and citizenship
Aliens, Immigration, and CitizenshipLaw questions
Court of Appeals follows the Skidmore framework, under which the measure of deference afforded to the agency depends upon the thoroughness evident in its consideration, validity of its reasoning, its consistency with earlier and later pronouncements, and all those factors which give it power to persuade if lacking power to control, if the relevant decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals is unpublished and is not directly controlled by any published decision interpreting the same statute.
1 Case that cites this headnote
4
Administrative Law and ProcedureAliens, immigration, and citizenship
Aliens, Immigration, and CitizenshipLaw questions
Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) had not issued any precedential opinion on whether alien's receipt of employment authorization document equated to admission “in any status,” precluding Court of Appeals from according Chevron deference to BIA's interpretation of relevant statutes and instead Court of Appeals would apply more limited Skidmore framework, under which measure of deference afforded depended upon thoroughness e.
TNT Dinar - TNT Tony Court Sentencing Documents Tony Renfrow 14 Daily PlusIraqi Dinar News
Here are the TNT Tony court documents following his sentencing on 11/30/2015 for the 14dailyplus.com ponzi scheme. Tony's brother Raymond Renfrow (RayRen98 / RayRay) has been conducting the TNT Dinar calls in Tony's absense. Tony is not permitted to make any calls or to even use social media. Court transcripts will be release soon. Court case 2:12-cr-20041.
Follow this Slideshare channel for updates. Please share this presentation. Thanks to Sherif for showing up at the courthouse to confront Tony before his sentencing.
Government attorneys across the country are submitting requests to re-calendar previously administratively closed immigration cases. What does this mean for the immigration court system, and what does this mean for you?
First of all, what is administrative closure? Immigration Judges for decades have administratively closed, or indefinitely postponed cases in Immigration Court. Another form of administrative closure is also called
Webinar | Texas vs. United States - The Repeal of ACA?benefitexpress
Recently a Federal District Court held in Texas, et al. v. United States of America, et al. that the individual mandate in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) is unconstitutional, and that the other provisions in the ACA are invalid because they are inseverable from the individual mandate.
Our ACA compliance webinar reviews:
- What the Federal District Court decided.
- The basis for the decision.
- The impact of the decision.
- What may happen over the next months or year.
- What Congress may do to address the situation.
649 F.3d 1086United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit..docxalinainglis
649 F.3d 1086
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Melchor GUEVARA, Petitioner,
v.
Eric H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.
No. 08–72252.Argued and Submitted Feb. 2, 2010.Filed June 3, 2011.
Synopsis
Background: Alien petitioned for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), which reversed the immigration judge's (IJ's) decision to grant alien cancellation of removal based on purported legal permanent resident (LPR) status arising from prior approval of his request for employment authorization.
Holdings: The Court of Appeals, N.R. Smith, Circuit Judge, held that:
1 court would apply limited Skidmore framework in reviewing BIA's decision;
2 prior grant of employment authorization did not grant alien LPR status; and
3 employment authorization was not equivalent to participation in Family Unity Program (FUP).
Petition denied.
Fisher, Circuit Judge, dissented and filed opinion.
West Headnotes (7)
Collapse West Headnotes
Change View
1
Administrative Law and ProcedureAliens, immigration, and citizenship
Aliens, Immigration, and CitizenshipLaw questions
Court of Appeals reviews de novo the determinations of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) of purely legal questions, including the BIA's interpretation of the Immigration and Nationality Act. Immigration and Nationality Act, § 101 et seq., 8 U.S.C.A. § 1101 et seq.
2
Administrative Law and ProcedureAliens, immigration, and citizenship
Aliens, Immigration, and CitizenshipLaw questions
Court of Appeals applies Chevron deference to the interpretations of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) as to ambiguous immigration statutes, if the BIA's decision is a published decision; however, the court need not defer to the BIA if the statute is unambiguous.
1 Case that cites this headnote
3
Administrative Law and ProcedureAliens, immigration, and citizenship
Aliens, Immigration, and CitizenshipLaw questions
Court of Appeals follows the Skidmore framework, under which the measure of deference afforded to the agency depends upon the thoroughness evident in its consideration, validity of its reasoning, its consistency with earlier and later pronouncements, and all those factors which give it power to persuade if lacking power to control, if the relevant decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals is unpublished and is not directly controlled by any published decision interpreting the same statute.
1 Case that cites this headnote
4
Administrative Law and ProcedureAliens, immigration, and citizenship
Aliens, Immigration, and CitizenshipLaw questions
Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) had not issued any precedential opinion on whether alien's receipt of employment authorization document equated to admission “in any status,” precluding Court of Appeals from according Chevron deference to BIA's interpretation of relevant statutes and instead Court of Appeals would apply more limited Skidmore framework, under which measure of deference afforded depended upon thoroughness e.
TNT Dinar - TNT Tony Court Sentencing Documents Tony Renfrow 14 Daily PlusIraqi Dinar News
Here are the TNT Tony court documents following his sentencing on 11/30/2015 for the 14dailyplus.com ponzi scheme. Tony's brother Raymond Renfrow (RayRen98 / RayRay) has been conducting the TNT Dinar calls in Tony's absense. Tony is not permitted to make any calls or to even use social media. Court transcripts will be release soon. Court case 2:12-cr-20041.
Follow this Slideshare channel for updates. Please share this presentation. Thanks to Sherif for showing up at the courthouse to confront Tony before his sentencing.
Government attorneys across the country are submitting requests to re-calendar previously administratively closed immigration cases. What does this mean for the immigration court system, and what does this mean for you?
First of all, what is administrative closure? Immigration Judges for decades have administratively closed, or indefinitely postponed cases in Immigration Court. Another form of administrative closure is also called
How to Obtain Permanent Residency in the NetherlandsBridgeWest.eu
You can rely on our assistance if you are ready to apply for permanent residency. Find out more at: https://immigration-netherlands.com/obtain-a-permanent-residence-permit-in-the-netherlands/.
Military Commissions details LtCol Thomas Jasper as Detailed Defense CounselThomas (Tom) Jasper
Military Commissions Trial Judiciary, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Notice of the Chief Defense Counsel's detailing of LtCol Thomas F. Jasper, Jr. USMC, as Detailed Defense Counsel for Abd Al Hadi Al-Iraqi on 6 August 2014 in the case of United States v. Hadi al Iraqi (10026)
In 2020, the Ministry of Home Affairs established a committee led by Prof. (Dr.) Ranbir Singh, former Vice Chancellor of National Law University (NLU), Delhi. This committee was tasked with reviewing the three codes of criminal law. The primary objective of the committee was to propose comprehensive reforms to the country’s criminal laws in a manner that is both principled and effective.
The committee’s focus was on ensuring the safety and security of individuals, communities, and the nation as a whole. Throughout its deliberations, the committee aimed to uphold constitutional values such as justice, dignity, and the intrinsic value of each individual. Their goal was to recommend amendments to the criminal laws that align with these values and priorities.
Subsequently, in February, the committee successfully submitted its recommendations regarding amendments to the criminal law. These recommendations are intended to serve as a foundation for enhancing the current legal framework, promoting safety and security, and upholding the constitutional principles of justice, dignity, and the inherent worth of every individual.
2. SUMMARY:
• This is an action for certiorari filed by the US Gov’t
represented by our Secretary of Justice.
• Jimenez was charged with conspiracy to commit
fraud, tax evasion and other charge in the USA.
3. FACTS:
• Mark Jimenez was a subject of an extradition proceedings in accordance to
an existing RP-US Treaty
• Jimenez sought and was granted a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) by
the RTC of Manila, Branch 25. The TRO prohibited the Department of
Justice (DOJ) from filing with the RTC a petition for his extradition. Later, this
TRO was lifted and an extradition case against him was filed.
• Before the RTC could act on the Petition, Respondent Jimenez filed before it
an Urgent Manifestation/Ex-Parte Motion, which prayed that petitioners
application for an arrest warrant be set for hearing.
4. FACTS:
• RTC granted the Motion of Jimenez and a hearing for extradition was
scheduled.
• The petitioner manifested its reservations on the procedure adopted by the
trial court because a hearing was initiated before a warrant was issued.
• The RTC issued a warrant in its order and set an amount for bail for the
temporary release of Jimenez.
• This order by the RTC was assailed by the Government of the USA,
represented by the SOJ.
5. USA/DOJ’s contention Jimenez’s Prayer
oThe proceeding is tainted by
grave abuse of discretion
because it allowed for a
hearing without issuance of
a warrant.
o There is no law that
authorize bail in an
extradition case.
In case a warrant is issued
against him, he should be
allowed bail.
7. * No, the constitutional provision on bail quoted
above, as well as Section 4 of Rule 114 of the Rules
of Court, applies only when a person has been
arrested and detained for violation of Philippine
criminal laws. It does not apply to extradition
proceedings because extradition courts do not render
judgments of conviction or acquittal.
8. * Before the US government requested the extradition of the
respondent, proceedings had already been conducted in that
country. But because he left the jurisdiction of the requesting
state before those proceedings could be completed, it was
hindered from continuing with the due processes prescribed
under its laws. His invocation of due process now has thus
become hollow. He already had that opportunity in the
requesting state; yet, instead of taking it, he ran away.
