John J. Pankauski is a partner with Pankauski Hauser PLLC in West Palm Beach, Florida. Mr. Pankauski has spent over 20 years of his career handling matters involving wills, trusts, estates, probates, and guardianships. His practice is limited to disputes, trials and appeals of such matters. He is AV Preeminent rated by Martindale Hubel.
2. DISCUSSION TOPICS
Probate Litigation 101: What does undue
influence have to do with setting aside a will
or trust?
How do courts look at undue influence?
What is undue influence?
How do you prove undue influence?
What is Florida’s public policy regarding
undue influence?
16. …“testator is induced by various means, to
execute an instrument which, although his, in
outward form, is in reality not his will, but the will
of another person which is substituted for that of
testator.”In re Winslow’s Estate, 147 So. 2d 613,617 ( Fla. 2d DCA 1962).
18. Undue Influence Defined – See Henry v. Jones, ____ So.3d ____
(Fla., 2nd DCA, October 14, 2016) 2016 WL 6036691: "Undue
influence must amount to 'over persuasion, duress, force,
or artful or fraudulent contrivances to such an extent that there is
destruction of free agency and willpower of the testator.' "Estate of
Kester v. Rocco, 117 So. 3d 1196, 1199 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013) (quoting
Raimi v.Furlong, 702 So. 2d 1273, 1287 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997)); see
Blinn v. Carlman, 159 So.3d 390 (Fla. 4th DCA, 2015), citing Levin v.
Levin, 60 So. 3d 1116, 1118 (Fla. 4th DCA, 2011).
23. “1) In all proceedings contesting the validity of a will, the burden
shall be upon the proponent of the will to establish prima facie its
formal execution and attestation. A self-proving affidavit executed
in accordance with s. 732.503 or an oath of an attesting witness
executed as required in s. 733.201(2) is admissible and establishes
prima facie the formal execution and attestation of the will.
Thereafter, the contestant shall have the burden of establishing the
grounds on which the probate of the will is opposed or revocation
is sought.
(2) In any transaction or event to which the presumption of undue
influence applies, the presumption implements public policy
against abuse of fiduciary or confidential relationships and is
therefore a presumption shifting the burden of proof under ss.
90.301-90.304. “
Burden of proof in contests;
presumption of
undue influence
LORIDA STATUTE 733.107
24. Van Meter v. Bank of
Clearwater
FLORIDA UNDUE
INFLUENCE CASE!!!
25.
26. Undue influence is a species of
fraud – Van Meter v. Bank of
Clearwater, 276 So. 2d 241 (Fla.,
DCA, 1973).
27. Undue influence, like fraud, must be
pled with particularity-- Fla. Rule Civ.
Proc. 1.120(b), – Van Meter v. Bank of
Clearwater, 276 So. 2d 241 (Fla., 2nd
DCA, 1973).
28. Doctrine of Undue Influence – based on the
that the person signed the will because he or she
was induced by various means, which, although the
will is “his” or “hers”, in “outward” form, the will, in
reality, is not his or her will, but rather the will of
another person—the “undue influencer.” Blinn v.
Carlman, 159 So.3d 390, 391 (Fla. 4th DCA, 2015).
43. IN CONCLUSION, REMEMBER THAT IT IS
IMPORTANT TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING :
Probate Litigation 101:What does undue
influence have to do with setting aside a will
or trust?
How do courts look at undue influence?
What is undue influence?
How do you prove undue influence?
What is Florida’s public policy regarding
undue influence?