UN, UN Global Compact - Origins, Future

11th Sept 2025
An Expert Analysis on the Origins and
Evolution of the UN Global Compact
I. Introduction: The Birth of a New Model for Global
Governance
The Geopolitical and Economic Context of the Late 20th Century
The establishment of the UN Global Compact (UNGC) in 2000 was a direct response to the
profound geopolitical and economic shifts of the late 20th century. As globalization accelerated,
a growing chorus of civil society organizations and labor groups raised concerns about the
negative impact of unchecked corporate power on human rights, labor standards, and the
environment. These groups had increasingly targeted multilateral institutions like the World
Trade Organization (WTO) , signaling a widespread public dissatisfaction with the prevailing
model of global governance.
In this volatile environment, then-UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan proposed a novel solution at
the 1999 World Economic Forum in Davos. His vision was to initiate a "global compact of
shared values and principles" that would "give a human face to the global market". This
proposal was not merely a moral appeal but a pragmatic recognition that a global economy
driven solely by short-term profit was vulnerable to a backlash from protectionism, populism,
and other forces that exploit the insecurity of those left behind. The UNGC was designed to
address this fundamental tension, leveraging the UN's moral authority to influence corporate
behavior through voluntary, collaborative means rather than through confrontational regulation.
This represented a significant departure from previous UN efforts to create a binding code of
conduct for multinational corporations, an approach that had been abandoned due to political
gridlock. The UNGC thus emerged as a pioneering experiment in "soft law," aiming to foster
change by shifting the focus from punishment to persuasion and from coercion to collaboration.
The Foundational Principles and Their Derivation
The UN Global Compact was officially implemented on July 26, 2000, with an initial framework
of nine principles. This set of core values was expanded to ten in June 2004 with the addition of
a principle against corruption. A crucial element of the UNGC's design was the decision to
derive these principles from a body of existing and widely accepted international agreements.
These included the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the International Labour
Organization's Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work, and the Rio
Declaration on Environment and Development. The tenth principle, on anti-corruption, was later
Made with Google Gemini
Sept 2025

11th Sept 2025
drawn from the United Nations Convention Against Corruption.
By anchoring its framework in these established texts, the UNGC gained a legitimacy that
distinguishes it from a simple corporate code of conduct. Companies that join are not merely
adopting a new set of voluntary rules; they are aligning their operations with a global body of
norms and values already codified in international law. This confers significant reputational
benefits and positions the initiative as an application of universal principles to the private sector.
The UNGC's framework, while non-binding, thus gains credibility by standing on the shoulders
of internationally recognized "hard law," a deliberate paradox that lies at the heart of its
innovative approach to global governance. The later integration of the anti-corruption principle
demonstrates the Compact's ability to evolve and adapt to emerging global concerns.
II. Sir Mark Moody-Stuart: A Co-Founder's Enduring
Influence
The Role of a Corporate Pioneer at the Founding
Sir Mark Moody-Stuart's presence at the inception of the UN Global Compact was both symbolic
and strategic. Serving as Chairman of the Royal Dutch/Shell Group of Companies from 1998 to
2001 , he represented a crucial segment of the global business community that the UN sought
to engage. The UNGC was launched with the participation of nearly 50 transnational
companies, and a key detail of this initial cohort was the inclusion of companies from sectors
like petroleum and mining, some of which had "a troubled history".
This was a deliberate choice by Kofi Annan. The hypothesis was that the greatest potential for
transformative change did not lie in partnering exclusively with companies already considered
ethical, but rather in influencing those whose practices were most in need of reform. Sir Mark,
as a leader of one of the world's largest and most scrutinized energy companies, embodied this
ideal. His participation provided the UNGC with immediate credibility and reach into a critical,
and often criticized, industry, signaling that the initiative was an invitation for all companies to
evolve, not just a club for the already converted. His presence and the participation of other
companies with challenging records demonstrated the UNGC’s commitment to fostering change
from within the global business system.
Sustained Leadership and Governance Contributions
Sir Mark Moody-Stuart’s commitment to the UNGC extended far beyond his initial role as a
corporate signatory. His engagement transformed into a long-term stewardship of the initiative's
governance and strategic direction. He served as a member of the UN Secretary-General's
Advisory Council for the UNGC from 2001 to 2004 and was Vice-Chairman of the UNGC Board
from 2006 to 2018. He also holds the position of Chairman of the Global Compact Foundation,
the US-based non-profit that provides financial and programmatic assistance to the UNGC.
This progression from corporate representative to a long-term governance leader highlights the
UNGC’s ability to cultivate enduring change agents. His direct involvement in the organization’s
evolution is exemplified by his role in co-leading the 2017 Governance Review. This
comprehensive review was undertaken to ensure the UNGC was "fit for purpose" to deliver on
Sept 2025

11th Sept 2025
its mandate to mobilize a global movement for the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).
This extensive and multi-decade commitment to the UNGC's mission is a testament to the
initiative's capacity to "socialize" its actors, turning initial corporate participants into dedicated
stewards of its core principles. His contributions underscore the depth of his personal
commitment, which he extended to co-chairing the G-8 Task Force on Renewable Energy in
2000 and 2001.
III. A Balance Sheet of Impact: Achievements and
Good Practice
Mainstreaming Corporate Sustainability and Global Growth
One of the most significant achievements of the UN Global Compact is its sheer scale and
reach. It has grown to become the world's largest corporate sustainability initiative, with over
20,000 corporate participants and stakeholders in more than 167 countries, encompassing
businesses of nearly every sector and size. This rapid expansion has been a critical factor in
normalizing the concept of corporate sustainability, shifting it from a niche concern to a
mainstream business function. The growth has been particularly notable in key emerging
markets; for instance, the number of participants from China increased from 200 to 377 between
2018 and 2020 alone, positioning China as the fastest-growing market in the Asia Pacific region
for the initiative.
This widespread adoption is a testament to the UNGC’s ability to mobilize a "global movement"
of responsible companies and stakeholders. The UNGC provides a framework, resources, and
networking events that have fundamentally altered how companies approach social and
environmental responsibility. Its mission is explicitly to "accelerate and scale the global collective
impact of business by upholding the Ten Principles and delivering the SDGs" , an ambition that
is demonstrably being pursued across diverse economic landscapes.
Concrete Examples and Sector-Specific Impact
The UNGC's influence is evident in the specific, on-the-ground actions taken by its participants.
The organization maintains a publicly available library of case studies that provide tangible
evidence of this progress, demonstrating that the principles are being translated into practical,
localized initiatives across a wide range of industries.
Examples from this library include:
● Iberostar's community-led marine conservation in Jamaica, which redefines sustainable
tourism by protecting ecosystems and empowering local communities.
● KristiesLab's gender equality initiatives, which showcase how empowering women can
be a strategic advantage that drives business growth and leadership.
● Sasini PLC's ambitious sustainability goals in Kenya, guided by the Ten Principles.
● o9 Solutions' commitment to embedding sustainability into software operations to
empower organizations and reduce emissions across supply chains.
These examples illustrate that the UNGC’s framework is not abstract but is actively shaping
corporate strategies. The case studies provide a glimpse into the diverse and innovative
Sept 2025

11th Sept 2025
solutions that companies are developing to address societal goals, ranging from poverty and
inequality to health and peace.
Catalyzing the SDG Agenda: The Forward Faster Initiative
Since the expiration of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) in 2015, the UNGC's
strategic priority has been explicitly aligned with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
and their 2030 deadlines. This strategic pivot demonstrates the organization's capacity for
evolution and its commitment to catalyzing progress on the world's most pressing challenges.
A key example of this focus is the "Forward Faster" initiative, which guides companies on where
they can make the "biggest, fastest impact before 2030". This initiative marks a significant move
from a general commitment to the SDGs to a more specific, action-oriented model. For instance,
it encourages companies to set science-based, net-zero emissions reduction targets in line with
a 1.5°C pathway. A particularly notable aspect of this initiative is its explicit exclusion of
commitments from fossil fuel companies for its climate action targets. This decision signals a
maturing of the UNGC’s strategy, where for certain critical issues, a higher and more specific
standard of commitment is required, departing from a purely inclusive-at-all-costs approach.
Complementing this, the "Energy Compacts" initiative, a UN-Energy-supported effort, aims to
accelerate clean, affordable energy for all. The third annual report for this initiative, published in
late 2024, reveals significant progress, with $1.4 trillion pledged and $201 billion in finance
mobilized since 2021. These funds have been used to enhance electricity access for 177 million
people and clean cooking access for 23 million people, demonstrating the tangible impact of
these goal-oriented, public-private partnerships.
IV. A Critical Assessment: The Dilemma of "Soft Law"
and "Bluewashing"
The "Soft Law" vs. "Hard Law" Debate
Despite its significant achievements and massive scale, the UNGC is consistently subject to
criticism that stems from its foundational "soft law" model. The initiative is not a regulatory
instrument and lacks "stringent and binding regulations" to monitor participants and enforce
obligations. While this voluntary, guiding character has allowed it to attract over 20,000
participants from across the globe , it also raises fundamental questions about its effectiveness
and ability to hold companies truly accountable for their actions.
Academic and civil society reviews of the UNGC are often polarized. Some scholars celebrate
its innovative structure as a "meta-regime" that leverages a multi-stakeholder approach to
address global governance gaps. Others, however, criticize its "structural fragility," arguing that it
fails to provide a "legally-binding" framework and instead extends corporate soft power at the
expense of the UN's own authority. This central tension—between a desire for massive,
voluntary participation and a demand for robust, verifiable accountability—is a defining
characteristic of the UNGC's ongoing journey.
Sept 2025

11th Sept 2025
The "Bluewashing" Critique and the Promise-Performance Gap
A central and persistent criticism of the UNGC is the phenomenon of "bluewashing". This term,
which derives from the UN flag's color, describes the practice of companies using their affiliation
with the UNGC to enhance their reputation without making substantive changes to their
underlying practices. A report cited in the research found that 40% of signatories did not
implement the Ten Principles in a way that guided policy reforms. This suggests a significant
"promise-performance gap," where companies' self-reported commitments in their
Communications on Progress (CoPs) are not always aligned with their actual conduct.
The UNGC's primary accountability tool, the annual Communication on Progress (CoP) report,
has been a key target of this critique. Critics argue that the self-reported nature of these reports
and the lack of a stringent, independent verification process create "loopholes" that allow firms
to "untie their CSR performance from the claims made". The absence of an independent
oversight or enforcement apparatus means that accountability is largely driven by public and
reputational pressure, a system that may be more effective for high-profile corporations than for
smaller, less visible firms.
Accountability Mechanisms and Their Limitations
The UNGC's primary mechanism for enforcing its voluntary commitments is the CoP.
Participating companies are required to submit an annual report detailing their efforts to embed
the Ten Principles into their strategies. Failure to submit this report leads to a company being
designated as "non-communicating," and if the status persists, it can be delisted from the
initiative.
The total number of delisted participants is substantial, numbering over 19,000 across multiple
lists. However, a close examination of the delisting criteria reveals that the vast majority of these
companies are removed for a "failure to communicate on progress," not for systematic
misconduct or human rights abuses. This suggests that the primary challenge for the UNGC is
not necessarily malicious intent but rather a lack of sustained, administrative commitment from a
large portion of its membership.
While the system for delisting for non-communication is transparent, the process for delisting
due to egregious misconduct is less clear and appears to be a "last resort". The high-profile
case of Volkswagen, which was "encouraged to withdraw" in 2015 following the diesel scandal
and was only reinstated five years later after significant reforms, demonstrates that the UNGC
can and does act on major integrity issues. However, such cases are rare exceptions to the
norm. This dichotomy highlights the delicate balance the UNGC must strike between
maintaining a broad, inclusive membership and upholding the integrity of its mission.
Sept 2025

11th Sept 2025
V. The UNGC in a Fragmented World: Geopolitics and
Strategic Relevance
Navigating a Global Fragmentation
The UN Global Compact was born out of a period of rapid globalization, but its evolution now
sees it navigating a world marked by increasing geopolitical fragmentation and supply chain
risks. In this environment, where traditional alliances are strained and major powers like the US,
EU, China, and Russia are increasingly at odds, the UNGC's role as a non-state actor is both
more complex and potentially more vital. The initiative cannot enforce compliance with
state-level sanctions or dictate political policy. Instead, its value lies in its unique position as a
neutral platform for dialogue and multi-stakeholder partnerships, serving as a nexus for
cooperation where official state-to-state relations may be frozen or hostile. It continues to drive
change in the face of "geopolitical instability," a strategic priority for its leadership.
A Regional Case Study: Engagement with China and Russia
The UNGC's engagement with major geopolitical players like China and Russia offers a
powerful illustration of the initiative's pragmatic approach and its inherent limitations.
With China, the UNGC has adopted a specific strategy that explicitly aligns with the country's
national priorities, such as its 14th Five-Year Plan. The strategy is "demand-driven" to support
China's sustainable development priorities and aims to engage Chinese companies on issues
including climate change, gender equality, and decent work. It also seeks to leverage private
sector involvement in China's Belt and Road Initiative and South-South cooperation. This
approach, which integrates the UNGC's principles into China's own development agenda, is a
calculated attempt to gain a foothold and influence corporate behavior from within a system that
is often resistant to external pressure. While this strategy may be perceived by some as a
compromise, it represents a deliberate choice to achieve impact where a more confrontational
model would likely fail.
In contrast, the UNGC's engagement with Russia reveals its structural limitations in the face of
hard power and conflict. The UNGC maintains a Local Network in Russia, which promotes its
own events and celebrates Russian state-owned companies. Simultaneously, other local
networks, such as the one in Ukraine, have actively responded to the humanitarian crisis by
mobilizing business to assist refugees and victims of the conflict. A striking detail is that the
Ukrainian network has even proposed imposing additional taxes on companies that continue to
operate in Russia , a position that is in stark contrast to the Russian network's
business-as-usual activities. This divergence highlights a significant challenge for the UNGC's
decentralized model. Without a consistent, values-driven stance on major geopolitical conflicts,
the initiative risks being seen as an organization that operates without a consistent moral
compass in moments of crisis, a direct consequence of its "soft law" approach that relies on
local and voluntary action.
Sept 2025

11th Sept 2025
Current Scale and Global Footprint
The UN Global Compact has grown to become the world's largest corporate sustainability
initiative. According to recent figures, there are over 25,493 participants operating in 167
countries. This includes more than 17,000 companies and over 3,800 non-business signatories.
The organization maintains a global agency and a network of local agencies, or "Local
Networks," in each participating country.
Regional Relevance and Activity
The UN Global Compact’s relevance is demonstrated through the diverse and tailored activities
of its Local Networks, which adapt the initiative’s global principles to specific regional and
national contexts.
● Europe: The UN Global Compact has a strong presence in Europe, with the highest
number of participants and over 30 Local Networks. This is reflected in the fact that
Europe also has the highest number of annual Communication on Progress (CoP)
submissions. The organization is also actively engaged in policy advocacy within the
European Union, encouraging policymakers to uphold the ambition of corporate
sustainability laws like mandatory due diligence frameworks.
● United States: The U.S. has a Local Network. The organization maintains a presence
during key events, such as the UN General Assembly, where it hosts a UN Global
Compact Hub and events like the "Business Guide to UNGA 80".
● China: The UNGC's strategy in China is designed to be "demand-driven," aligning with
the country's national priorities, such as its 14th Five-Year Plan. This approach aims to
engage Chinese companies on issues like climate change, gender equality, and decent
work, while also leveraging private sector involvement in the Belt and Road Initiative and
South-South cooperation. China has been identified as the fastest-growing market for
the initiative in the Asia-Pacific region.
● ASEAN: The broader Asia region hosts more than 15 Local Networks. These networks
collaborate to address common issues at both regional and sub-regional levels. Recent
activities include bringing together Chinese and Indonesian private sectors to accelerate
progress on the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).
● India: The UN Global Compact Network India (UN GCNI) was the first Local Network
globally to be established with full legal recognition. It serves as a platform for Indian
businesses, academic institutions, and civil society organizations to work together on
responsible business practices.
● Russia: The Russian Federation has an active Local Network with 75 participants,
including large companies like Rosneft and Lukoil. The network focuses on promoting
the UNGC principles within the Russian business environment and interacting with
government authorities. It also organizes events, such as a seminar on "Business and
Indigenous Peoples of Russia" and celebrations of Russian state-owned companies.
● Latin America: The UNGC has Local Networks in numerous Latin American countries.
In 2024, a Global Compact Network Caribbean was launched, based in Barbados and
Sept 2025

11th Sept 2025
supported by the Regional Hub in Panama. There are also examples of successful
collective action initiatives, such as a project in Brazil that provided clean water to
millions of people.
● Middle East and North Africa (MENA): This region includes Local Networks in
countries like Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon, Morocco, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab
Emirates.
Organizational Structure and Funding
The UN Global Compact is headquartered in New York City. Its operations are overseen by a
CEO & Executive Director, a position currently held by Sanda Ojiambo. The organization's
structure is a decentralized model, with a global office that works with independent,
self-governed Local Networks worldwide.
The UN Global Compact does not receive funding from the regular budget of the United
Nations. Its financial model is a hybrid of public and private contributions. It is funded through
contributions from governments to the UN Global Compact Trust Fund and from businesses to
the Foundation for the Global Compact. The Foundation, a U.S.-based non-profit, provides
essential financial and programmatic support to the initiative.
Corporate contributions are tiered based on a company's annual gross revenue, ranging from
an annual contribution of $2,500 for companies with sales between $50 million and $250 million,
up to $30,000 for those with annual gross sales over $30 billion.
Sept 2025

11th Sept 2025
VI. Future Trajectory and Recommendations
The Financial Model: Commitment and Predictability
The UN Global Compact's operational model is a unique hybrid, funded by a combination of
contributions from governments to the UN Global Compact Trust Fund and from businesses to
the Foundation for the Global Compact. It is important to note that the UNGC does not receive
funding from the regular UN budget, a feature that ensures its independence but also creates a
reliance on private sector contributions. Corporate contributions are tiered based on annual
revenue, ranging from $2,500 to $30,000 for the largest companies.
This financial model is directly connected to the UNGC's high rate of non-compliance. The high
number of delisted companies, mostly for failure to communicate on progress , suggests that for
many participants, the "soft costs" of participation—the time and effort required for
reporting—may outweigh the perceived benefits. For the UNGC to achieve long-term financial
and strategic stability, it must demonstrate a clear and compelling return on investment for its
members beyond just reputational gains. This imperative is underscored by the broader UN
development system’s "Funding Compact," which seeks more "predictable and flexible funding"
from member states to ensure the successful achievement of the SDGs.
Recommendations for Proper Progression
Based on an analysis of its history, impact, and challenges, the UN Global Compact can take
several strategic steps to strengthen its integrity and accelerate its mission:
● Strengthening Accountability and Integrity: To directly address the "bluewashing"
critique and the promise-performance gap, the UNGC should evolve its Communication
on Progress (CoP) into a more rigorous and auditable system. This could involve
requiring third-party verification of key performance indicators related to human rights,
labor, and environmental impact. Moving away from a purely qualitative, self-reported
narrative would enhance the initiative's credibility and provide a stronger basis for holding
companies accountable.
● Leveraging Its Unique Position: In a world of increasing fragmentation, the UNGC's
greatest asset is its neutrality and convening power. It should double down on its role as a
platform for multi-stakeholder dialogue on complex issues where governments are often
unable to act alone. The UNGC can serve as a vital bridge, translating the scientific and
technical requirements of the climate agenda (e.g., the Science Based Targets initiative)
into actionable business strategies and policy recommendations.
● A Refined Membership Model: The UNGC should continue to build on the momentum of
its "Forward Faster" initiative by setting clear, ambitious, and time-bound expectations for
its members on critical issues like climate action and human rights. The explicit exclusion
of fossil fuel companies from certain climate initiatives is a valuable precedent that
demonstrates a more selective, principles-based approach can co-exist with a large,
inclusive membership. This hybrid model allows the UNGC to both maintain its broad
reach and demand higher standards from participants in the most critical areas.
Sept 2025

11th Sept 2025
VII. Conclusion: A Pragmatic Imperfect Instrument
The UN Global Compact was conceived by Kofi Annan as a pragmatic and voluntary instrument
to give the global market a "human face". In the two decades since its inception, it has achieved
considerable success in mainstreaming corporate sustainability and catalyzing a global
movement of businesses aligned with the SDGs. Its ability to convene diverse stakeholders,
from corporate leaders like Sir Mark Moody-Stuart to civil society organizations, has made it a
powerful force for dialogue and collaboration.
However, the UNGC remains an imperfect instrument. Its "soft law" framework and reliance on
voluntary compliance have exposed it to the valid criticisms of "bluewashing" and a significant
promise-performance gap. The high number of delisted companies, primarily for administrative
non-compliance, highlights the persistent challenge of fostering long-term, deep engagement.
The initiative's role in a fragmented geopolitical landscape, as seen in the stark contrast
between its local networks in Ukraine and Russia, underscores the limits of its voluntary model
when confronted with issues of hard power and conflict.
Ultimately, the UNGC's journey reflects a pioneering effort to create a new form of global
governance in an age where traditional regulatory mechanisms have struggled to keep pace
with corporate power. While it may not be a perfect solution to the challenges of corporate
accountability, it remains a vital and pragmatic platform. Its future success depends on its ability
to evolve, strengthening its integrity measures while maintaining its core mission as a convener
and catalyst for positive change in a world that urgently needs a more sustainable and inclusive
global economy.
Works cited
1. Global Compact | UN Sustainability Goals & Corporate ... - Britannica,
https://www.britannica.com/topic/Global-Compact 2. The UN Global Compact,
https://www.globalcompact.ru/en/ 3. Kofi Annan's address to World Economic Forum in Davos |
United ...,
https://www.un.org/sg/en/content/sg/speeches/1999-02-01/kofi-annans-address-world-economic
-forum-davos 4. United Nations Global Compact - Wikipedia,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Global_Compact 5. (PDF) THE UN GLOBAL
COMPACT: MOVING TOWARDS A CRITICAL MASS OR A CRITICAL STATE? -
ResearchGate,
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/276051199_THE_UN_GLOBAL_COMPACT_MOVING
_TOWARDS_A_CRITICAL_MASS_OR_A_CRITICAL_STATE 6. Default title | OHCHR,
https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2009/10/default-title-972 7. The Ten Principles | UN
Global Compact, https://unglobalcompact.org/what-is-gc/mission/principles 8. Sir Mark
Moody-Stuart | Department of Economic and Social Affairs,
https://sdgs.un.org/panelists/sir-mark-moody-stuart-29291 9. Sir Mark Moody-Stuart -
AccountAbility, https://www.accountability.org/team/sir-mark-moody-stuart 10. Sir Mark
Moody-Stuart - Argüden Governance Academy,
https://argudenacademy.org/en/about-us/advisory-board/sir-mark-moody-stuart 11. Sir Mark
Moody-Stuart - Zamyn, https://www.zamyn.org/board-of-directors/sir-mark-moody-stuart.html
12. Mark Moody-Stuart | Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs,
Sept 2025

11th Sept 2025
https://www.carnegiecouncil.org/people/mark-moody-stuart 13. Our Governance | UN Global
Compact, https://unglobalcompact.org/about/governance 14. (PDF) The United Nations Global
Compact - ResearchGate,
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/258126558_The_United_Nations_Global_Compact
15. The world's largest corporate sustainability initiative - UN Global Compact,
https://unglobalcompact.org/what-is-gc 16. UN Global Compact: Homepage,
https://unglobalcompact.org/ 17. Our Mission | UN Global Compact,
https://unglobalcompact.org/what-is-gc/mission 18. (PDF) The UN Global Compact -
ResearchGate, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/309824954_The_UN_Global_Compact
19. UN GLOBAL COMPACT CHINA STRATEGY - AWS,
https://ungc-communications-assets.s3.amazonaws.com/docs/publications/CHINA%20STRATE
GY-digital%20version-English.pdf 20. Academy - Case library | UN Global Compact,
https://unglobalcompact.org/academy/case-library 21. Our Impact | UN Global Compact,
https://unglobalcompact.org/what-is-gc/mission/our-impact 22. Align your business with the
SDGs in five steps | UN Global Compact,
https://unglobalcompact.org/take-action/action/sdg-advocates-letter 23. Climate Action |
Forward Faster, https://forwardfaster.unglobalcompact.org/climate-action 24. Energy Compacts |
United Nations, https://www.un.org/en/energycompacts 25. Limitations of the United Nations
Global Compact: Bluewashing as a Structural Error,
https://rucforsk.ruc.dk/ws/files/75403159/Limitations_of_the_UNGC.pdf 26. Global Sustainability
Governance and the UN Global Compact: A Rejoinder to Critics,
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/270322437_Global_Sustainability_Governance_and_t
he_UN_Global_Compact_A_Rejoinder_to_Critics 27. Reflecting on the UN Global Compact:
what went wrong? - LSE Business Review,
https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/businessreview/2022/07/26/reflecting-on-the-un-global-compact-what-we
nt-wrong/ 28. Unmasking Bluewashing: The Emerging Threat to ESG - Automic Group,
https://www.automicgroup.com.au/news/2023/09/14/unmasking-bluewashing-the-emerging-thre
at-to-esg/ 29. Reporting - UN Global Compact, https://unglobalcompact.org/participation/report
30. Delisting and Rejoining Policy 2025.docx - AWS,
https://ungc-communications-assets.s3.amazonaws.com/docs/publications/Delisting%20and%2
0Rejoining%20Policy_March%202024.pdf 31. Non-business Handbook | UN Global Compact,
https://unglobalcompact.org/handbook/non-business 32. De-Listed Participants | UN Global
Compact,
https://unglobalcompact.org/participation/report/cop/delisted?page=449&per_page=25 33.
Volkswagen Group officially reinstated as a participant of the UN Global Compact,
https://media.vw.com/releases/1480 34. Volkswagen Group is officially reinstated as a
participant of the UN Global Compact,
https://www.volkswagen-group.com/en/press-releases/volkswagen-group-is-officially-reinstated-
as-a-participant-of-the-un-global-compact-16743 35. Leadership & Policy Advocacy | UN Global
Compact, https://unglobalcompact.org/take-action/leadership/leadership-and-policy-advocacy
36. Shifting trade flows in Europe: How geopolitical dynamics are shaping new alliances -
Deloitte,
https://www.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/topics/business-strategy-growth/eu-trade-shifts-geopoliti
cs.html 37. Sanctions | Security Council - the United Nations,
https://main.un.org/securitycouncil/en/sanctions/information 38. The International Working
Sept 2025

11th Sept 2025
Group on Russian Sanctions | FSI, https://fsi.stanford.edu/working-group-sanctions 39. About
Country Networks | UN Global Compact,
https://unglobalcompact.org/engage-locally/about-local-networks 40. UN Global Compact
Russia, https://www.globalcompact.ru/en/about/global-compact-russia/ 41. War in Ukraine -
Global Transformation of the Corporate World,
https://unglobalcompact.ge/sustainability-spotlight/en/war-in-ukraine-global-transformation-of-th
e-corporate-world/ 42. UKRAINE - UN Global Compact Network Italia,
https://www.globalcompactnetwork.org/en/tags/ukraine.html 43. The Foundation for the Global
Compact | UN Global Compact, https://unglobalcompact.org/about/foundation 44. Unsdg |
Funding Compact - UN Sustainable Development Group - the United Nations,
https://unsdg.un.org/funding-compact 45. UN Development System Funding Compact | UN
Transparency Portal, https://open.un.org/resources/un-development-system-funding-compact
46. Transforming business, changing the world - UN Global Compact Netzwerk Deutschland,
https://www.globalcompact.de/migrated_files/wAssets/docs/Nachhaltigkeits-CSR-Management/i
mpact-transforming_business_changing_the_world.pdf
Sept 2025

UN, UN Global Compact - Origins, Future

More Related Content

Similar to UN, UN Global Compact - Origins, Future

More from Energy for One World

Recently uploaded

UN, UN Global Compact - Origins, Future