“A widespread introduction of “a new segment of ugly fruit and vegetables” is a complete disaster for farmers in general; and especially for those who this measure leaves out of the “ugly fruits” market.
This is a project suggesting an idea that was to reduce our food waste.
This project was done by 4 people taking online course for Design Thinking from IDEO (design consultancy) in Sydney, Australia. Our team members were from different industries like program, graphic design and human research and also different nationalities like English, Korean, Australian and Russian.
This document outlines a project to create soups and smoothies from "ugly" fruits and vegetables that would otherwise go to waste due to supermarkets' strict cosmetic standards. It estimates that 20-40% of UK produce and over half of all global food is lost this way. The project aims to make soups and smoothies from these foods for a Green Week event using recyclable packaging, with supporting documentary footage. It provides example recipes and lists next steps like testing recipes, packaging, and contacting organizations for advice. The overall goal is to inform consumers about food waste and encourage buying "ugly" produce to pressure supermarkets into stocking them.
This document outlines a proposed business model called Ugly Vegetable that aims to reduce food waste by delivering imperfect or misshapen produce directly to customers. The business would collect surplus fruits and vegetables rejected by supermarkets due to not meeting size or aesthetic standards from farms and deliver them to both businesses (B2B) and consumers (B2C). Key benefits include reducing food waste, lowering food miles, promoting seasonal produce with better flavor, and reducing packaging. Revenue would be generated through a modest price markup on the produce after accounting for collection and delivery costs. Competition is currently limited but scaling up demand is a challenge to reach profitability.
Les Legumes Moches, Case Study by The AzoresThe Azores
1. Intermarche, a French retailer, launched a campaign called "Les legumes moches" to promote "ugly" or misshapen produce and raise awareness about food waste.
2. The campaign was a success, with the entire stock of "ugly" produce selling out in two days and supermarket traffic increasing 24%.
3. The humorous campaign used witty storytelling and intense promotion to highlight the message that misshapen produce was just as tasty, helping address the issue of 40% of produce being discarded due to standards.
Natureview Farm is considering options to grow its revenue beyond $20 million by 2001. Option 1 is to expand its 8-oz yogurt cups into supermarket regions, which could generate $16.1 million in revenue in 2000 and $19.3 million in 2001. Option 2 is launching a national rollout of its 32-oz cups, projected to earn $9.2 million in 2000 and $9.2 million in 2001. Option 3 is introducing children's multipacks in natural food stores, with potential revenues of $3.8 million in 2000 and $3.3 million in 2001. The recommendation is to combine Options 1 and 3 to leverage the revenue growth of supermarkets while maintaining relationships in natural food stores.
This document discusses output-output relationships, also known as product-product relationships. It defines this concept as dealing with resource allocation among competing enterprises while keeping inputs constant. The key types of output relationships discussed are joint products, complementary enterprises, supplementary enterprises, and competitive enterprises. Marginal rates of product substitution and iso-revenue lines are also explained as tools for determining the optimal combination of outputs.
Optimisation of a process toward a strategic objectiveJean-Pierre Haddad
The farming owners want to increase profits by modifying their process. They produce 3 crops - tomatoes, cucumbers, and peppers - and can adjust leased fields and workers. An optimization model represents the problem with variables like crop quantities, prices, and costs. It finds the profit-maximizing solution within market and resource constraints. The optimal amounts of peppers and tomatoes are produced. Increasing workers or markets can further boost profits if marginal returns remain positive.
Optimisation of a process toward a strategic objectiveJean-Pierre Haddad
The farming owners want to increase profits by modifying their process. They produce 3 crops - tomatoes, cucumbers, and peppers - using leased fields, greenhouses, and hired workers. An optimization model represents the factors that determine profits: crop quantities sold and prices, and field/labor costs and quantities. The model finds the crop production levels that maximize profits given market demands and resource constraints. It shows how adjusting factors like labor, greenhouse use, or crop quantities impacts profits.
This is a project suggesting an idea that was to reduce our food waste.
This project was done by 4 people taking online course for Design Thinking from IDEO (design consultancy) in Sydney, Australia. Our team members were from different industries like program, graphic design and human research and also different nationalities like English, Korean, Australian and Russian.
This document outlines a project to create soups and smoothies from "ugly" fruits and vegetables that would otherwise go to waste due to supermarkets' strict cosmetic standards. It estimates that 20-40% of UK produce and over half of all global food is lost this way. The project aims to make soups and smoothies from these foods for a Green Week event using recyclable packaging, with supporting documentary footage. It provides example recipes and lists next steps like testing recipes, packaging, and contacting organizations for advice. The overall goal is to inform consumers about food waste and encourage buying "ugly" produce to pressure supermarkets into stocking them.
This document outlines a proposed business model called Ugly Vegetable that aims to reduce food waste by delivering imperfect or misshapen produce directly to customers. The business would collect surplus fruits and vegetables rejected by supermarkets due to not meeting size or aesthetic standards from farms and deliver them to both businesses (B2B) and consumers (B2C). Key benefits include reducing food waste, lowering food miles, promoting seasonal produce with better flavor, and reducing packaging. Revenue would be generated through a modest price markup on the produce after accounting for collection and delivery costs. Competition is currently limited but scaling up demand is a challenge to reach profitability.
Les Legumes Moches, Case Study by The AzoresThe Azores
1. Intermarche, a French retailer, launched a campaign called "Les legumes moches" to promote "ugly" or misshapen produce and raise awareness about food waste.
2. The campaign was a success, with the entire stock of "ugly" produce selling out in two days and supermarket traffic increasing 24%.
3. The humorous campaign used witty storytelling and intense promotion to highlight the message that misshapen produce was just as tasty, helping address the issue of 40% of produce being discarded due to standards.
Natureview Farm is considering options to grow its revenue beyond $20 million by 2001. Option 1 is to expand its 8-oz yogurt cups into supermarket regions, which could generate $16.1 million in revenue in 2000 and $19.3 million in 2001. Option 2 is launching a national rollout of its 32-oz cups, projected to earn $9.2 million in 2000 and $9.2 million in 2001. Option 3 is introducing children's multipacks in natural food stores, with potential revenues of $3.8 million in 2000 and $3.3 million in 2001. The recommendation is to combine Options 1 and 3 to leverage the revenue growth of supermarkets while maintaining relationships in natural food stores.
This document discusses output-output relationships, also known as product-product relationships. It defines this concept as dealing with resource allocation among competing enterprises while keeping inputs constant. The key types of output relationships discussed are joint products, complementary enterprises, supplementary enterprises, and competitive enterprises. Marginal rates of product substitution and iso-revenue lines are also explained as tools for determining the optimal combination of outputs.
Optimisation of a process toward a strategic objectiveJean-Pierre Haddad
The farming owners want to increase profits by modifying their process. They produce 3 crops - tomatoes, cucumbers, and peppers - and can adjust leased fields and workers. An optimization model represents the problem with variables like crop quantities, prices, and costs. It finds the profit-maximizing solution within market and resource constraints. The optimal amounts of peppers and tomatoes are produced. Increasing workers or markets can further boost profits if marginal returns remain positive.
Optimisation of a process toward a strategic objectiveJean-Pierre Haddad
The farming owners want to increase profits by modifying their process. They produce 3 crops - tomatoes, cucumbers, and peppers - using leased fields, greenhouses, and hired workers. An optimization model represents the factors that determine profits: crop quantities sold and prices, and field/labor costs and quantities. The model finds the crop production levels that maximize profits given market demands and resource constraints. It shows how adjusting factors like labor, greenhouse use, or crop quantities impacts profits.
This case study document outlines NatureView Farm's goal to grow its revenues by over 50% within 23 months in order to attract new investors or an acquisition. It provides an overview of the company's history and the organic food market trends. It then analyzes 3 options to expand NatureView's product lines and distribution channels: 1) expanding 8-oz cups into supermarkets, 2) expanding 32-oz cups nationally, or 3) expanding children's multipacks in natural food stores. Financial projections are presented for each option, with the recommendation being to expand the multipacks into supermarkets in the Northeast and West to minimize channel conflicts and attract new customers.
This document discusses inflation, including causes, types of measurement, and who wins and loses. It defines inflation as a general increase in price levels and describes several ways to measure inflation, including consumer price index (CPI), wholesale price index, and GDP deflator. CPI specifically tracks price changes in a market basket of consumer goods. The document also classifies inflation into cost-push, demand-pull, and structural types based on underlying causes. Finally, it notes that retirees, credit card holders, and those with fixed incomes tend to lose from inflation, while real estate owners, speculators, and some borrowers can benefit.
This document discusses greenhouse vegetable production and yields in Ontario for 2015. Some key points:
- Greenhouse area for tomatoes, peppers and cucumbers was 2700 acres in 2015, an increase of 150 acres from 2014.
- Average yields were 38 kg/m2 overall, with tomatoes at 44.8 kg/m2, peppers at 24.1 kg/m2, and cucumbers at 47.9 kg/m2.
- Gross profit averaged $75.02/m2. Production costs averaged $70/m2, including $58.5/m2 in operational expenses.
- Maintaining optimal plant architecture and crop management techniques can increase yields and
ECONOMICS 100A: INTERMEDIATE MACROECONOMICS
AMJAD TOUKAN
Summer Session I 2021
Due Monday July 26th by midnight
PROBLEM SET 6
Chapter 9 Problems
1. Suppose the market for widgets can be described by the following equations:Demand: P = 10 – QSupply: P = Q – 4
where P is the price in dollars per unit and Q is the quantity in thousands of units. Then:
a. What is the equilibrium price and quantity?
b. Suppose the government imposes a tax of $1 per unit to reduce widget consumption and raise government revenues. What will the new equilibrium quantity be? What price will the buyer pay? What amount per unit will the seller receive?
c. Suppose the government has a change of heart about the importance of widgets to the happiness of the American public. The tax is removed and a subsidy of $1 per unit granted to widget producers. What will the equilibrium quantity be? What price will the buyer pay? What amount per unit (including the subsidy) will the seller receive? What will be the total cost to the government?
2. Japanese rice producers have extremely high production costs, due in part to the high opportunity cost of land and to their inability to take advantage of economies of large-scale production. Analyze two policies intended to maintain Japanese rice production: (1) a per-pound subsidy to farmers for each pound of rice produced, or (2) a per-pound tariff on imported rice. Illustrate with supply-and-demand diagrams the equilibrium price and quantity, domestic rice production, government revenue or deficit, and deadweight loss from each policy. Which policy is the Japanese government likely to prefer? Which policy are Japanese farmers likely to prefer?
3. In 1983, the Reagan Administration introduced a new agricultural program called the Payment-in-Kind Program. To see how the program worked, let’s consider the wheat market.
a. Suppose the demand function is QD = 28 – 2P and the supply function is QS = 4 + 4P, where P is the price of wheat in dollars per bushel, and Q is the quantity in billions of bushels. Find the free-market equilibrium price and quantity.
a. Now suppose the government wants to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. However, the payment is made in wheat rather than in dollars – hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from vast government reserves accumulated from previous price support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equal to the amount that could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is now produced by farmers? How much is indirectly supplied to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
b. Had the government not given the wheat back to the farmers, it would have stored or destroyed it. Do taxpayers gain from the program? What potential problem ...
GM Farming & Agriculture aims to provide sustainable agriculture and energy crop production in Germany. It owns farms in Frensdorf, Germany and plans to expand to 40 hectares by 2017. Currently, 45% of fruits and vegetables in Germany are imported. GMFA will grow seasonal and energy crops domestically to meet local demand. It will focus on maize cultivation for biogas production. The company forecasts increasing profits from $14,100 in 2017 to $79,003 in 2020 as it grows its operations and distribution networks. Total equity required is $200,000 to purchase land, install a biogas plant, and provide working capital.
- A monopoly market is characterized by a single seller of a unique product without close substitutes. Barriers to entry like government protections, large economies of scale, or exclusive ownership of resources allow monopolies to exist.
- A monopoly is both the firm and the industry and is the price maker. It faces a downward sloping demand curve where price exceeds marginal revenue. The profit-maximizing quantity is where marginal revenue equals marginal cost.
- At this quantity, the monopoly sets the highest price that demand allows. If price exceeds average total cost, the monopoly earns economic profits. In the long run, only monopolies that earn super-normal profits can remain in business.
This document discusses perfect competition in the long run. It provides two scenarios to analyze how a perfectly competitive firm, Joe the catfish farmer, would respond to a decline in prices. If prices fell to $71/unit, Joe should shut down his business as it would be cheaper than producing at a loss. However, if prices only fell to $81/unit, Joe should continue operating in the short run to minimize his losses until prices potentially increase. The document also discusses how, in perfect competition, the constant entry and exit of firms in response to profits and losses drives prices toward the lowest point on the average total cost curve in the long run.
Price Ceiling and Price Floors. 2022.pptJon Newland
This document discusses economic efficiency and the impacts of price ceilings and price floors using supply and demand analysis. It begins by explaining that economic efficiency is maximized at competitive market equilibrium. When markets are not at equilibrium, there is a deadweight loss. The document then analyzes the impacts of price ceilings and price floors using supply and demand graphs. It shows that price ceilings create shortages while price floors create surpluses. Both result in deadweight losses that reduce total economic surplus.
This document provides an overview of an introductory lecture on agricultural economics. It discusses why agricultural economics is an important field, covering topics like food security, trade, and subsidies. It then introduces some key concepts in welfare economics used to analyze agricultural policies, including consumer and producer surplus. Specific agricultural policies of the EU Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) are examined, including price supports and export subsidies that led to overproduction and dumping of surpluses on world markets. This generated controversies and budget issues for the EU. Reforms have since moved away from price supports, but production still relies on subsidies.
It is a stream of social sciences and commerce.
It is a study of production, consumption, distribution and regulation of flow of goods and services in an economy.
It has a direct relation with money.
It studies the economic aspect of goods and services provided in the economy.
It is a wider concept and hence affects the overall conditions of the economy.
It has two major segments: micro and macro. It is derived from Greek word ‘Mikros’.
It creates efficiency and smoothens up the process of final consumption of goods and services.
It tries to understand the problems that occur while producing, distributing and consuming a product.
It deepens our understanding.
Consumption is a broader term and it is the essence of economics. Economists generally consider consumption to be the final purpose of economic activity, hence consumption per person is a central measure of an economy’s productive success.
Consumption in economics means utilization of a product or a commodity and to derive benefits from the same. The utility of a product will help us in satisfying our needs and hence it is consumption.
Consumption can be defined in different ways, but is usually best described as the final purchase of goods and services by individuals. The purchase of a new pair of shoes, a burger at the fast food restaurant, or the service of getting your house cleaned are all examples of consumption.
It is a state of maximum satisfaction from a consumption.
A producer will obtain the stage of equilibrium when he will get maximum profit from his production.
In economics, economic equilibrium is a state where economic forces such as supply and demand are balanced and in the absence of external influences the (equilibrium) values of economic variables will not change.
Equilibrium occurs at the point at which quantity demanded and quantity supplied are equal. Market equilibrium in this case refers to a condition where a market price is established through competition.
This price is often called the competitive price or market clearing price and will tend not to change unless demand or supply changes and the quantity is called "competitive quantity" or market clearing quantity.
The document discusses macroeconomic measures like GDP and economic growth. It defines GDP as the total value of goods and services produced within a country in a year. GDP is calculated by adding up consumer spending, investment, government spending, and net exports. Nominal GDP uses current prices, while real GDP adjusts for inflation to show changes in the actual quantity of goods produced. The document also discusses related concepts like GNP, NNP, and the components and calculation of GDP.
Question 1A factor of production whose quantity can be changed d.docxmakdul
Question 1
A factor of production whose quantity can be changed during a particular period is a:
marginal factor of production.
fixed factor of production.
incremental factor of production.
variable factor of production.
Question 2
Assuming that all other factors of production are held constant, marginal product is the change in ________ output resulting from a 1-unit change in _______ .
total; a variable input
total; a fixed input
total; average product
per unit; a fixed input
Question 3
Average variable cost is the ratio of:
total cost to the marginal cost.
total cost to the amount of variable input.
variable cost to the quantity of output.
marginal cost to the quantity of output.
Question 4
The curve labeled V represents the firm's _______ curve.
total cost
average total cost
marginal cost
average variable cost
Question 5
When an increase in the firm's output reduces its long-run average cost, it experiences:
economies of scale.
diseconomies of scale.
constant returns to scale.
variable returns to scale.
Question 6
A firm that is able to more efficiently utilize by-products as it increases production in the long run is an example of:
economies of scale.
diseconomies of scale.
labor-intensive production.
capital-intensive production.
Question 7
If your plant is operating in the positively-sloped portion of a long-run average cost curve, this could be the result of:
decreased input prices.
improved utilization of by-products.
specialization of resources.
limited decision-making capacity.
Question 8
Perfect competition is a model of the market that assumes all of the following EXCEPT:
a large number of firms.
firms face downward-sloping demand curves.
firms produce identical goods.
many buyers.
Question 9
The Case in Point on the Burkha Industry suggested that this industry:
might be an example of perfect competition although it did not feature easy entry and exit.
might be an example of perfect competition because it did feature easy entry and exit.
might not be an example of perfect competition although it did feature easy entry and exit.
might not be an example of perfect competition because it did not feature easy entry and exit.
Question 10
If a perfectly competitive firm sells 30 units of output at a price of $10 per unit, its marginal revenue is:
$10.
more than $10.
less than $10.
$300.
Question 11
The difference between total revenue and total cost is:
economic profit.
nominal revenue.
average revenue.
marginal revenue.
Question 12
If a perfectly competitive firm is producing a quantity that generates MC < MR, then profit:
is maximized.
can be increased by increasing production.
can be increased by decreasing production.
can be increased by increasing the price.
Question 13
In the short run, a perfectly competitive firm does not produce output and earns a negative economic profit if:
P = ATC.
P < AVC.
AVC > P > ATC.
AVC < P < ATC.
Question 14
If all fir ...
This chapter brings together the basic ideas of consumer demand, and the production and cost concerns. This chapter will enable students to understand how price is determined in a market and the role of price.
This document discusses pricing and output decisions under pure competition. It defines key terms like market, market structure, and types of market structures. Pure competition is characterized by many small firms, identical goods, free entry and exit. In the short run, firms will produce where marginal revenue equals marginal cost to maximize profits. In the long run, firms will enter or exit the industry until price equals minimum average total cost and economic profits are zero. Overall, pure competition is said to lead to efficient allocation of resources, though it has shortcomings around income distribution and market failures.
This document discusses food cost concepts for restaurants. It defines food cost as the percentage of total sales spent on food products. A normal restaurant's food cost is 28-30% while a steakhouse is 35%. There are three aspects of food cost: maximum allowable food cost percentage, actual food cost percentage calculated from income statements, and potential food cost percentage determined by menu sales mix. The maximum allowable food cost is calculated from payroll, overhead, and target profit expenses. The actual food cost comes from inventory and sales data. Potential food cost is calculated theoretically from the cost and sales of each menu item.
The document discusses managerial economics concepts including accounting profit vs economic profit, decision making models, game theory, and production functions. It provides examples and calculations to illustrate these concepts. For accounting profit, it gives a calculation showing the difference between accounting profit and economic profit. For decision making, it outlines the steps a company would take to make an optimal decision. For game theory, it analyzes a 2x2 game and determines the equilibrium strategies. For production functions, it analyzes data on fish catch to determine stages of production and optimal crew size.
The document discusses various measures of national income and output, including GDP. It defines GDP as the total value of goods and services produced domestically in a country. GDP can be measured in three ways - the output method, income method, and expenditure method. Real GDP measures output adjusted for inflation to give a truer picture of economic performance than nominal GDP.
This document summarizes the Cournot duopoly model of market competition between two firms. It explains that under Cournot's assumptions, the two firms will each capture 1/3 of the market share and settle at an equilibrium price point between the competitive and monopoly prices. The model involves the firms reacting to each other's output and price decisions in successive rounds until they split the market evenly. Some criticisms of the model are that it assumes costless production and does not allow for new firm entry or learning over time.
This document provides an overview of perfect competition in the context of the milk market. It defines key characteristics of perfect competition, including a large number of small producers/sellers, standardized/homogeneous products, price-taking behavior, free entry and exit, and lack of non-price competition. The document then analyzes how the milk market exhibits these characteristics, such as small individual farms, uniform milk quality, and farmers being price takers. It concludes that the milk market approximates perfect competition.
This case study document outlines NatureView Farm's goal to grow its revenues by over 50% within 23 months in order to attract new investors or an acquisition. It provides an overview of the company's history and the organic food market trends. It then analyzes 3 options to expand NatureView's product lines and distribution channels: 1) expanding 8-oz cups into supermarkets, 2) expanding 32-oz cups nationally, or 3) expanding children's multipacks in natural food stores. Financial projections are presented for each option, with the recommendation being to expand the multipacks into supermarkets in the Northeast and West to minimize channel conflicts and attract new customers.
This document discusses inflation, including causes, types of measurement, and who wins and loses. It defines inflation as a general increase in price levels and describes several ways to measure inflation, including consumer price index (CPI), wholesale price index, and GDP deflator. CPI specifically tracks price changes in a market basket of consumer goods. The document also classifies inflation into cost-push, demand-pull, and structural types based on underlying causes. Finally, it notes that retirees, credit card holders, and those with fixed incomes tend to lose from inflation, while real estate owners, speculators, and some borrowers can benefit.
This document discusses greenhouse vegetable production and yields in Ontario for 2015. Some key points:
- Greenhouse area for tomatoes, peppers and cucumbers was 2700 acres in 2015, an increase of 150 acres from 2014.
- Average yields were 38 kg/m2 overall, with tomatoes at 44.8 kg/m2, peppers at 24.1 kg/m2, and cucumbers at 47.9 kg/m2.
- Gross profit averaged $75.02/m2. Production costs averaged $70/m2, including $58.5/m2 in operational expenses.
- Maintaining optimal plant architecture and crop management techniques can increase yields and
ECONOMICS 100A: INTERMEDIATE MACROECONOMICS
AMJAD TOUKAN
Summer Session I 2021
Due Monday July 26th by midnight
PROBLEM SET 6
Chapter 9 Problems
1. Suppose the market for widgets can be described by the following equations:Demand: P = 10 – QSupply: P = Q – 4
where P is the price in dollars per unit and Q is the quantity in thousands of units. Then:
a. What is the equilibrium price and quantity?
b. Suppose the government imposes a tax of $1 per unit to reduce widget consumption and raise government revenues. What will the new equilibrium quantity be? What price will the buyer pay? What amount per unit will the seller receive?
c. Suppose the government has a change of heart about the importance of widgets to the happiness of the American public. The tax is removed and a subsidy of $1 per unit granted to widget producers. What will the equilibrium quantity be? What price will the buyer pay? What amount per unit (including the subsidy) will the seller receive? What will be the total cost to the government?
2. Japanese rice producers have extremely high production costs, due in part to the high opportunity cost of land and to their inability to take advantage of economies of large-scale production. Analyze two policies intended to maintain Japanese rice production: (1) a per-pound subsidy to farmers for each pound of rice produced, or (2) a per-pound tariff on imported rice. Illustrate with supply-and-demand diagrams the equilibrium price and quantity, domestic rice production, government revenue or deficit, and deadweight loss from each policy. Which policy is the Japanese government likely to prefer? Which policy are Japanese farmers likely to prefer?
3. In 1983, the Reagan Administration introduced a new agricultural program called the Payment-in-Kind Program. To see how the program worked, let’s consider the wheat market.
a. Suppose the demand function is QD = 28 – 2P and the supply function is QS = 4 + 4P, where P is the price of wheat in dollars per bushel, and Q is the quantity in billions of bushels. Find the free-market equilibrium price and quantity.
a. Now suppose the government wants to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. However, the payment is made in wheat rather than in dollars – hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from vast government reserves accumulated from previous price support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equal to the amount that could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is now produced by farmers? How much is indirectly supplied to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
b. Had the government not given the wheat back to the farmers, it would have stored or destroyed it. Do taxpayers gain from the program? What potential problem ...
GM Farming & Agriculture aims to provide sustainable agriculture and energy crop production in Germany. It owns farms in Frensdorf, Germany and plans to expand to 40 hectares by 2017. Currently, 45% of fruits and vegetables in Germany are imported. GMFA will grow seasonal and energy crops domestically to meet local demand. It will focus on maize cultivation for biogas production. The company forecasts increasing profits from $14,100 in 2017 to $79,003 in 2020 as it grows its operations and distribution networks. Total equity required is $200,000 to purchase land, install a biogas plant, and provide working capital.
- A monopoly market is characterized by a single seller of a unique product without close substitutes. Barriers to entry like government protections, large economies of scale, or exclusive ownership of resources allow monopolies to exist.
- A monopoly is both the firm and the industry and is the price maker. It faces a downward sloping demand curve where price exceeds marginal revenue. The profit-maximizing quantity is where marginal revenue equals marginal cost.
- At this quantity, the monopoly sets the highest price that demand allows. If price exceeds average total cost, the monopoly earns economic profits. In the long run, only monopolies that earn super-normal profits can remain in business.
This document discusses perfect competition in the long run. It provides two scenarios to analyze how a perfectly competitive firm, Joe the catfish farmer, would respond to a decline in prices. If prices fell to $71/unit, Joe should shut down his business as it would be cheaper than producing at a loss. However, if prices only fell to $81/unit, Joe should continue operating in the short run to minimize his losses until prices potentially increase. The document also discusses how, in perfect competition, the constant entry and exit of firms in response to profits and losses drives prices toward the lowest point on the average total cost curve in the long run.
Price Ceiling and Price Floors. 2022.pptJon Newland
This document discusses economic efficiency and the impacts of price ceilings and price floors using supply and demand analysis. It begins by explaining that economic efficiency is maximized at competitive market equilibrium. When markets are not at equilibrium, there is a deadweight loss. The document then analyzes the impacts of price ceilings and price floors using supply and demand graphs. It shows that price ceilings create shortages while price floors create surpluses. Both result in deadweight losses that reduce total economic surplus.
This document provides an overview of an introductory lecture on agricultural economics. It discusses why agricultural economics is an important field, covering topics like food security, trade, and subsidies. It then introduces some key concepts in welfare economics used to analyze agricultural policies, including consumer and producer surplus. Specific agricultural policies of the EU Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) are examined, including price supports and export subsidies that led to overproduction and dumping of surpluses on world markets. This generated controversies and budget issues for the EU. Reforms have since moved away from price supports, but production still relies on subsidies.
It is a stream of social sciences and commerce.
It is a study of production, consumption, distribution and regulation of flow of goods and services in an economy.
It has a direct relation with money.
It studies the economic aspect of goods and services provided in the economy.
It is a wider concept and hence affects the overall conditions of the economy.
It has two major segments: micro and macro. It is derived from Greek word ‘Mikros’.
It creates efficiency and smoothens up the process of final consumption of goods and services.
It tries to understand the problems that occur while producing, distributing and consuming a product.
It deepens our understanding.
Consumption is a broader term and it is the essence of economics. Economists generally consider consumption to be the final purpose of economic activity, hence consumption per person is a central measure of an economy’s productive success.
Consumption in economics means utilization of a product or a commodity and to derive benefits from the same. The utility of a product will help us in satisfying our needs and hence it is consumption.
Consumption can be defined in different ways, but is usually best described as the final purchase of goods and services by individuals. The purchase of a new pair of shoes, a burger at the fast food restaurant, or the service of getting your house cleaned are all examples of consumption.
It is a state of maximum satisfaction from a consumption.
A producer will obtain the stage of equilibrium when he will get maximum profit from his production.
In economics, economic equilibrium is a state where economic forces such as supply and demand are balanced and in the absence of external influences the (equilibrium) values of economic variables will not change.
Equilibrium occurs at the point at which quantity demanded and quantity supplied are equal. Market equilibrium in this case refers to a condition where a market price is established through competition.
This price is often called the competitive price or market clearing price and will tend not to change unless demand or supply changes and the quantity is called "competitive quantity" or market clearing quantity.
The document discusses macroeconomic measures like GDP and economic growth. It defines GDP as the total value of goods and services produced within a country in a year. GDP is calculated by adding up consumer spending, investment, government spending, and net exports. Nominal GDP uses current prices, while real GDP adjusts for inflation to show changes in the actual quantity of goods produced. The document also discusses related concepts like GNP, NNP, and the components and calculation of GDP.
Question 1A factor of production whose quantity can be changed d.docxmakdul
Question 1
A factor of production whose quantity can be changed during a particular period is a:
marginal factor of production.
fixed factor of production.
incremental factor of production.
variable factor of production.
Question 2
Assuming that all other factors of production are held constant, marginal product is the change in ________ output resulting from a 1-unit change in _______ .
total; a variable input
total; a fixed input
total; average product
per unit; a fixed input
Question 3
Average variable cost is the ratio of:
total cost to the marginal cost.
total cost to the amount of variable input.
variable cost to the quantity of output.
marginal cost to the quantity of output.
Question 4
The curve labeled V represents the firm's _______ curve.
total cost
average total cost
marginal cost
average variable cost
Question 5
When an increase in the firm's output reduces its long-run average cost, it experiences:
economies of scale.
diseconomies of scale.
constant returns to scale.
variable returns to scale.
Question 6
A firm that is able to more efficiently utilize by-products as it increases production in the long run is an example of:
economies of scale.
diseconomies of scale.
labor-intensive production.
capital-intensive production.
Question 7
If your plant is operating in the positively-sloped portion of a long-run average cost curve, this could be the result of:
decreased input prices.
improved utilization of by-products.
specialization of resources.
limited decision-making capacity.
Question 8
Perfect competition is a model of the market that assumes all of the following EXCEPT:
a large number of firms.
firms face downward-sloping demand curves.
firms produce identical goods.
many buyers.
Question 9
The Case in Point on the Burkha Industry suggested that this industry:
might be an example of perfect competition although it did not feature easy entry and exit.
might be an example of perfect competition because it did feature easy entry and exit.
might not be an example of perfect competition although it did feature easy entry and exit.
might not be an example of perfect competition because it did not feature easy entry and exit.
Question 10
If a perfectly competitive firm sells 30 units of output at a price of $10 per unit, its marginal revenue is:
$10.
more than $10.
less than $10.
$300.
Question 11
The difference between total revenue and total cost is:
economic profit.
nominal revenue.
average revenue.
marginal revenue.
Question 12
If a perfectly competitive firm is producing a quantity that generates MC < MR, then profit:
is maximized.
can be increased by increasing production.
can be increased by decreasing production.
can be increased by increasing the price.
Question 13
In the short run, a perfectly competitive firm does not produce output and earns a negative economic profit if:
P = ATC.
P < AVC.
AVC > P > ATC.
AVC < P < ATC.
Question 14
If all fir ...
This chapter brings together the basic ideas of consumer demand, and the production and cost concerns. This chapter will enable students to understand how price is determined in a market and the role of price.
This document discusses pricing and output decisions under pure competition. It defines key terms like market, market structure, and types of market structures. Pure competition is characterized by many small firms, identical goods, free entry and exit. In the short run, firms will produce where marginal revenue equals marginal cost to maximize profits. In the long run, firms will enter or exit the industry until price equals minimum average total cost and economic profits are zero. Overall, pure competition is said to lead to efficient allocation of resources, though it has shortcomings around income distribution and market failures.
This document discusses food cost concepts for restaurants. It defines food cost as the percentage of total sales spent on food products. A normal restaurant's food cost is 28-30% while a steakhouse is 35%. There are three aspects of food cost: maximum allowable food cost percentage, actual food cost percentage calculated from income statements, and potential food cost percentage determined by menu sales mix. The maximum allowable food cost is calculated from payroll, overhead, and target profit expenses. The actual food cost comes from inventory and sales data. Potential food cost is calculated theoretically from the cost and sales of each menu item.
The document discusses managerial economics concepts including accounting profit vs economic profit, decision making models, game theory, and production functions. It provides examples and calculations to illustrate these concepts. For accounting profit, it gives a calculation showing the difference between accounting profit and economic profit. For decision making, it outlines the steps a company would take to make an optimal decision. For game theory, it analyzes a 2x2 game and determines the equilibrium strategies. For production functions, it analyzes data on fish catch to determine stages of production and optimal crew size.
The document discusses various measures of national income and output, including GDP. It defines GDP as the total value of goods and services produced domestically in a country. GDP can be measured in three ways - the output method, income method, and expenditure method. Real GDP measures output adjusted for inflation to give a truer picture of economic performance than nominal GDP.
This document summarizes the Cournot duopoly model of market competition between two firms. It explains that under Cournot's assumptions, the two firms will each capture 1/3 of the market share and settle at an equilibrium price point between the competitive and monopoly prices. The model involves the firms reacting to each other's output and price decisions in successive rounds until they split the market evenly. Some criticisms of the model are that it assumes costless production and does not allow for new firm entry or learning over time.
This document provides an overview of perfect competition in the context of the milk market. It defines key characteristics of perfect competition, including a large number of small producers/sellers, standardized/homogeneous products, price-taking behavior, free entry and exit, and lack of non-price competition. The document then analyzes how the milk market exhibits these characteristics, such as small individual farms, uniform milk quality, and farmers being price takers. It concludes that the milk market approximates perfect competition.
2. Current Scenario. Lets say that we
currently have a fresh produce
market of a total of 100kg of
selected Class I products.
First Effect . An over supplied market will pressure down all
fresh produce prices.
Regular
Market
First Issue:
Does anybody believe that we can
increase demand by 15% from one day
to another?
New Scenario. An over supplied
market = 100kg of selected fresh
produce + 15*kg of Ugly fruits.
Total 115kg.
Summary. There is an excess of 15kg in this new
market and so there is an excess of growers that
produce them. The less efficient growers that
cannot life with the reduced prices will
disappear.
Market with
Ugly Fruits
*Hypothesis. 15
extra kilos of ugly
fruits out of a
production of 100kg
currently sold. Based
on own estimations
of proponents of this
trend (meaning that
currently 10% to
15% of edible but
ugly fruits are
discarded).
3. 15% of the Supply Base will disappear. We can
even assume (almost impossible) that after the
initial oversupply market-shock, prices of Class I
fruits get back to normal.
The total consumption of this new market will
continue to be 100kg. (or a very modest increase
due to the reduced prices; because eating habits do
not change dramatically when prices get reduced but
rather when prices heavily increase)
Summary. So even at best possible scenario (discount price
reduction of 30%), the total size of the market gets
reduced by 4,5%.
100kg x 2€ (Hypothetical Retail
Price) = (200 €)
Size of the Regular Market
Size of Regular
Market (€)
Size of Market
with Ugly Fruits
(€)
*Hypothesis.
Retailers estimate
that Ugly Fruits are
regularly sold at a
discount price
reduction that range
from 30% to 50
85kg x 2€ (Hypothetical
Retail Price)
15kg x 1,40€ (Hypothetical
Retail Price -30%)
Size of market with Ugly
Fruits: 191 €
4. Following our reasoning, the size of the
market is reduced by 4,5%, but we also
need to address the impact on the Producers’
Turnover taking into consideration all
Supply Chain Costs*.
Summary: Producer’s Turnover gets reduced by 18% .
*Hypothesis. To simplify
calculation we estimate all
Supply Chain Costs together.
According to last available
data, average gross
Producers’ turnover account
for ¼ of Retail Price.
Produce Turnover
Regular Market
Producer Turnover
M. With Ugly Fruits
Supply Chain Costs and
margins: 200€ x ¾ = 150€
Producers’ Turnover:
200€ x 1/4 = 50€
or
200€-150€= 50€
Supply Chain Costs and
margins= 150€ (same costs
and margins in the new market)
Producers’ Turnover:
191€ - 150 = 41€
5. We are told that this new product
Ugly Fruits niche market
maximize Growers’ Turnover and
Profit by selling all crop and not
only the selected Class I.
As previously seen (see
previous slide) not only
turnover does not increase
but rather reach to a
minimum of 18%. Now
we concentrate on how
profits get impacted.
To review growers’ profits we will
estimate all farming costs at once.
Growers’ Profits
Regular Market
Grower’s Profits
M. with Ugly Fruits
*Hypothesis. To simplify
theoretical Analysis, we
assume a generous 50%
margin (excluding
amortization, interests
and unpaid family labor)
To be able to sell 100kg,
growers produce an excess that
is discarded
(Ugly/Unfit/Deficient).
Kilos Grown (100+15%)=
117,64kg
Growers’ Profits:
50€ (Turnover)-25€ (Costs)=
25€
Unit Costs:
25€/117,64kg=0,20€
We assume growers produce no
excess (use all crop)
Kilos Grown 100kg
We apply same Unit costs :
0,20€/kg
Grower’s Costs:
41€ (Turnover)-20,40€
(Costs)=
20,60€ (-17,60%)
6. Total Market
(in €) is reduced
by 4,5%
Growers’ Profits get
trimmed by 17,60%
Growers’
turnover is lowered
by 18%
The less efficient growers
representing 15% of the
production are expelled from
the business.
The New Market
with
Ugly Fruits”
“A widespread introduction of a new
segment of ugly fruit and vegetables”
is a complete disaster for farmers in general;
and especially for those who this measure
leaves out of the “ugly fruits” market..
This is good example on how good intentions
(from institutions, retailers and NGOs) can
introduce with this movement perverse
incentives that hinder the improvement and
progress of the efficiency of production
systems.