The document is a court order from the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir disposing of a writ petition filed by the Kashmir Pandit Sangarash Samiti. The court order notes that the petitioners' counsel submitted that the case is covered by an earlier 2013 judgment on a similar writ petition. The court agrees and disposes of the petition, directing the respondents to consider the claims of the petitioners in light of the 2013 judgment, provided it is applicable. The respondents are directed to take a decision on the matter within 6 weeks while being provided copies of both petitions.
Scheduled Castes Development Department - The Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Act,
2014 –The Andhra Pradesh (Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Backward Classes)
Regulation of Issue of Community Certificates Act, 1993 (Act No. 16 of 1993) and the
Andhra Pradesh (Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Backward Classes) Issue of
Community, Nativity and Date of Birth Certificate Rules, 1997 – Adaptation in the State of
Telangana and amendments to the said Act and Rules – Orders – Issued.
This document outlines guidelines from the Government of Telangana regarding the issuance of Creamy Layer certificates for Socially and Educationally Backward Classes. It references previous orders and memos on determining Creamy Layer status. Key points include:
- Annexures providing the application format (Form VIIA) and certificate format (Form VIIB) for issuing Creamy/Non-Creamy Layer certificates.
- Guidelines state that income from salaries and agricultural land should not be considered when determining Creamy Layer status.
- All revenue officials not below the rank of Tahsildar are authorized to issue the certificates.
This document outlines orders made by the Government of Telangana adapting laws related to issuing caste certificates in the newly formed state. It summarizes:
1) The Andhra Pradesh Reorganization Act allowed Telangana to adapt existing laws for facilitating their application in the new state.
2) The document adapts the Andhra Pradesh (Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Backward Classes) Regulation of Issue of Community Certificates Act, 1993 and related rules by substituting references to Andhra Pradesh with Telangana.
3) It specifies the competent authorities at different levels (mandal, revenue division, district) authorized to issue caste, nativity and birth certificates in Telangana
Backward Classes Welfare Department – List of Backward Classes Castes/
Communities pertaining to the State of Telangana – Adaptation of (112) Backward
Classes Castes/ Communities and percentage of reservation - Orders – Issued.
The petitioners filed this writ petition challenging the failure of the State Government to conduct a socio-economic survey to revise the list of backward classes as mandated under the Kerala State Commission for Backward Classes Act, 1993. The petitioners had submitted representations to include certain castes/classes in the backward list, but the Kerala State Commission for Backward Classes declined to consider the representations citing the lack of a recent socio-economic survey. The petitioners argued that the survey was necessary to revise the backward classes list as per the Act and the Supreme Court's directives in previous judgments. They sought a writ directing the State to publish the results of the pending survey or conduct a new survey to facilitate the revision of the backward classes list.
This document provides details of a court case in the Gauhati High Court regarding the operation of detention centers for foreigners/illegal migrants awaiting deportation or adjudication in Assam. It summarizes Supreme Court guidelines that such persons must be held in appropriate facilities outside of prisons that provide basic amenities like electricity, water, hygiene, and medical care. The government of India has communicated to states that a sufficient number of detention centers meeting these standards must be set up and maintained, and can involve renting private buildings temporarily if needed. The document establishes parameters for the proper operation of detention centers in accordance with Supreme Court directives.
Order judgment passed by hon'ble high court in sikh community casesabrangsabrang
This document summarizes a court case in Jammu and Kashmir regarding employment benefits for Kashmiri Sikhs and Kashmiri Pandits. It provides background on the mass exodus of Kashmiri Pandits from the Kashmir Valley in 1990 due to militancy and the government programs established to provide rehabilitation and employment. The petitioners, representing Kashmiri Sikhs, claim they should receive the same employment benefits as Kashmiri Pandits under the Prime Minister's rehabilitation package. The court document reviews the history of government actions and reports on assisting Kashmiri migrants.
This order discusses the response from the Central Government and various State Governments on the measures taken to assist migrant workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. It notes that over 57 lakh migrant workers were transported back to their home states via Shramik special trains, while 41 lakh were transported via road. The order examines responses from key source and destination states like Maharashtra, Delhi, Gujarat, Uttar Pradesh, Bihar and others on the number of migrant workers helped and remaining. It directs states to further identify stranded workers and arrange their safe travel back home with food and other necessities.
Scheduled Castes Development Department - The Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Act,
2014 –The Andhra Pradesh (Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Backward Classes)
Regulation of Issue of Community Certificates Act, 1993 (Act No. 16 of 1993) and the
Andhra Pradesh (Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Backward Classes) Issue of
Community, Nativity and Date of Birth Certificate Rules, 1997 – Adaptation in the State of
Telangana and amendments to the said Act and Rules – Orders – Issued.
This document outlines guidelines from the Government of Telangana regarding the issuance of Creamy Layer certificates for Socially and Educationally Backward Classes. It references previous orders and memos on determining Creamy Layer status. Key points include:
- Annexures providing the application format (Form VIIA) and certificate format (Form VIIB) for issuing Creamy/Non-Creamy Layer certificates.
- Guidelines state that income from salaries and agricultural land should not be considered when determining Creamy Layer status.
- All revenue officials not below the rank of Tahsildar are authorized to issue the certificates.
This document outlines orders made by the Government of Telangana adapting laws related to issuing caste certificates in the newly formed state. It summarizes:
1) The Andhra Pradesh Reorganization Act allowed Telangana to adapt existing laws for facilitating their application in the new state.
2) The document adapts the Andhra Pradesh (Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Backward Classes) Regulation of Issue of Community Certificates Act, 1993 and related rules by substituting references to Andhra Pradesh with Telangana.
3) It specifies the competent authorities at different levels (mandal, revenue division, district) authorized to issue caste, nativity and birth certificates in Telangana
Backward Classes Welfare Department – List of Backward Classes Castes/
Communities pertaining to the State of Telangana – Adaptation of (112) Backward
Classes Castes/ Communities and percentage of reservation - Orders – Issued.
The petitioners filed this writ petition challenging the failure of the State Government to conduct a socio-economic survey to revise the list of backward classes as mandated under the Kerala State Commission for Backward Classes Act, 1993. The petitioners had submitted representations to include certain castes/classes in the backward list, but the Kerala State Commission for Backward Classes declined to consider the representations citing the lack of a recent socio-economic survey. The petitioners argued that the survey was necessary to revise the backward classes list as per the Act and the Supreme Court's directives in previous judgments. They sought a writ directing the State to publish the results of the pending survey or conduct a new survey to facilitate the revision of the backward classes list.
This document provides details of a court case in the Gauhati High Court regarding the operation of detention centers for foreigners/illegal migrants awaiting deportation or adjudication in Assam. It summarizes Supreme Court guidelines that such persons must be held in appropriate facilities outside of prisons that provide basic amenities like electricity, water, hygiene, and medical care. The government of India has communicated to states that a sufficient number of detention centers meeting these standards must be set up and maintained, and can involve renting private buildings temporarily if needed. The document establishes parameters for the proper operation of detention centers in accordance with Supreme Court directives.
Order judgment passed by hon'ble high court in sikh community casesabrangsabrang
This document summarizes a court case in Jammu and Kashmir regarding employment benefits for Kashmiri Sikhs and Kashmiri Pandits. It provides background on the mass exodus of Kashmiri Pandits from the Kashmir Valley in 1990 due to militancy and the government programs established to provide rehabilitation and employment. The petitioners, representing Kashmiri Sikhs, claim they should receive the same employment benefits as Kashmiri Pandits under the Prime Minister's rehabilitation package. The court document reviews the history of government actions and reports on assisting Kashmiri migrants.
This order discusses the response from the Central Government and various State Governments on the measures taken to assist migrant workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. It notes that over 57 lakh migrant workers were transported back to their home states via Shramik special trains, while 41 lakh were transported via road. The order examines responses from key source and destination states like Maharashtra, Delhi, Gujarat, Uttar Pradesh, Bihar and others on the number of migrant workers helped and remaining. It directs states to further identify stranded workers and arrange their safe travel back home with food and other necessities.
1. The petitioner, an advocate, filed a PIL claiming the Kerala state government is discriminating against minority communities in India by favoring Muslims over other minorities like Christians in various socio-economic empowerment schemes.
2. The petitioner argues that as per the Indian constitution and the National Commission for Minorities Act, the central government notifies six religious communities as minorities, including Muslims, Christians, Sikhs, Buddhists, Zoroastrians and Jains, and schemes should benefit all equally without favoring any one.
3. However, various orders of the Kerala government, like the 80:20 reservation ratio in one order, arbitrarily favor Muslims over Latin Catholic and converted Christian minorities without any valid rationale, violating
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss.For real time update Visit our social media handle.Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace.Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
The Kashmiri Pandit Sangarash Samiti is undertaking a second phase of a fast-unto-death protest to demand that the Jammu and Kashmir UT Administration fulfill assurances made on September 30th, 2020 to consider their demands on priority. Their demands include implementing government orders and High Court directions regarding jobs for educated Kashmiri Pandit/Hindu youth, financial aid and accommodation for 808 non-migrant Pandit/Hindu families in the Kashmir Valley, and extending migrant welfare benefits to non-migrants. Sanjay Tickoo, the President of KPSS, and activist Sandeep Koul have begun this second phase of fasting after over 50 days with no progress from the administration on their demands
1. The daily order from the High Court of Karnataka discusses issues related to migrant workers in the state during the COVID-19 pandemic.
2. It notes the responses from the state and central governments and identifies further actions needed to assist migrant workers wishing to return to their home states, including ensuring they are informed of transportation options and addressing any inability to pay train fares.
3. The order also seeks additional details from the Bangalore Metro Rail Corporation on measures taken to support its workers during the pandemic, including on food, wages, and compliance with prior court directions.
The document is the response from the Minister of State in the Ministry of Home Affairs to an unstarred question asked in Lok Sabha regarding the National Register of Citizens (NRC) in Assam. The key points are:
1) The final NRC was published on August 31, 2019 excluding over 19 lakh people but included over 3.11 crore people.
2) The decision regarding eligibility of 'D' voters and their descendants has been kept on hold by the Supreme Court.
3) A separate list of excluded Gorkhas was not published.
3) Anyone excluded has 120 days to file an appeal with the Foreigners Tribunals. The government has established 200 additional tribun
The document is a response from the Minister of State in the Ministry of Home Affairs to an unstarred question in the Lok Sabha regarding illegal immigrants in India and Karnataka.
It states that detection and deportation of illegal migrants is an ongoing process led by the Central Government. While the Central Government has the power to deport illegal foreign nationals, these powers have been delegated to State Governments. Consolidated instructions on deportation have been issued to States.
The State of Karnataka has informed that they are in the process of establishing a detention/holding center for illegal immigrants. There is no accurate data on the total number of illegal migrants as they enter clandestinely, but Karnataka has reported 143
The applicants, who are Dalit-Bahujan-Adivasi activists and journalists, have filed this intervention application in the ongoing public interest litigation regarding the Hathras gang rape and murder case. They seek to provide insights on caste-based atrocities against Dalits, especially Dalit women, and barriers they face in accessing justice. The application notes that Uttar Pradesh has the highest number of cases under the SC/ST Prevention of Atrocities Act but has failed to properly implement the Act, such as identifying atrocity-prone areas or formulating contingency plans as required. It aims to highlight the systemic discrimination and lack of protection faced by Dalits in Uttar Pradesh.
Guj hc order rejecting modification of rath yatra ordersabrangsabrang
This document discusses several applications filed before the Gujarat High Court related to the Rath Yatra festival in Ahmedabad amid the COVID-19 pandemic. The High Court had previously ordered that there will be no Rath Yatra procession this year. One application sought to modify this order to allow a symbolic procession with just 3 chariots and no public involvement. The Court notes that the temple trust has now said the chariots will only move within the temple premises and there will be no traditional city-wide procession.
10 may 28th suo moto migrant crisis interim ordersabrangsabrang
This document outlines the proceedings of the Supreme Court of India regarding problems faced by migrant workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. It notes that several states have responded to notices issued by the court and an initial report was submitted by the central government. During hearings, the court issued interim directions to central and state governments to provide free transport and food to migrant workers and simplify registration processes. The court ordered governments to submit additional details regarding support for migrant workers.
The document provides a historical overview of Jammu and Kashmir from ancient times up until August 2019. Some key points:
- Kashmir has a long Buddhist history dating back to emperor Ashoka in the 3rd century BC. Buddhism flourished under king Kanishka in the 1st century AD.
- In the 14th century, Shah Mir established the first Muslim dynasty in Kashmir, though many Hindu rulers preceded him. The Mughals ruled Kashmir from the 16th century onwards.
- In August 2019, the Indian government revoked Article 370 of the constitution, eliminating the special autonomous status of Jammu and Kashmir and dividing it into two union territories. This was a major political and constitutional
The Government of India approved a proposal to provide 3000 additional state government jobs and 6000 transit accommodations for Kashmiri migrants at an estimated cost of Rs. 2000 Crore. India will fund the jobs and land acquisition costs. The jobs will go to migrant families who left or stayed during the 1990s violence. India requested Jammu and Kashmir send a detailed implementation plan and monthly progress reports. Expenditure will be covered under Security Related Expenditure.
First india ahmedabad edition-30 july 2020FIRST INDIA
Welcome to the Official Website of First India E-Paper. We are the best ENGLISH NEWS PAPER in India with Special coverage of Rajasthan & Gujrat. Follow us for the LATEST NEWS & Top LIVE NEWS in India and around the world.
Visit:- https://www.firstindia.co.in/
The document is a court judgment from the Gauhati High Court regarding a public interest litigation (PIL) petition filed by Debabrata Saikia concerning evictions of approximately 700 families in the Sipajhar area of Assam for an agro farm project. The court heard from the petitioner's counsel and the government counsel. While it will not interfere with the cabinet decision for the project, it notes around 600 families have already been resettled but around 100 families remain without rehabilitation. The court orders these 100 families to apply to the Deputy Commissioner within 6 months for land allotment, who must pass individual reasoned orders on each application.
The document is a letter from the All Assam Minorities Students' Union to the Home Minister of India expressing views on the Citizenship Amendment Bill of 2019, the National Register of Citizens in Assam, and Clause 6 of the Assam Accord. It provides background on the Assam Agitation, Assam Accord, Citizenship Act amendments, Supreme Court cases related to NRC, and the process of preparing and publishing the NRC in Assam. It also discusses amendments made to exempt certain minority groups from Pakistan, Bangladesh and Afghanistan from prosecution if they entered India before 2014 due to religious persecution. Legal challenges to these amendments are pending before the Supreme Court.
Jammu and Kashmir - A new dawn of progress and peaceASO6KM
This document summarizes key developments in Jammu and Kashmir following the constitutional amendments removing Articles 370 and 35A in August 2019. It discusses improvements in security conditions, a reduction in terrorist activities, and expanded development initiatives in areas like tourism, industry, infrastructure, education, social welfare programs, and healthcare. Key political and administrative changes are also outlined, such as the establishment of a single cadre for civil servants, equal rights for all citizens, and rehabilitation support for migrants and refugees.
The document is an order from a High Court in India regarding an application for bail. It summarizes the following:
1) The applicant, Babita Sukar Kashyap, is seeking bail in connection with an FIR registered against her for offenses related to sedition, conspiracy, and causing enmity between groups.
2) She is alleged to have instigated followers of a tribal group in Gujarat to take violent action based on her interpretation of constitutional provisions. However, the prosecution has not clearly established her specific role or any actual violence.
3) The court observed that the applicant has been in custody for over a year, the key evidence is collected, and the prosecution has not shown any risk
Minorities Welfare Department – “ Shaadi Mubaarak Scheme” for extending
financial assistance of Rs.51,000/-(Rupees Fifty one thousand only) to each girl
belonging to the Minority at the time of marriage residing at Telangana State -
Orders- Issued.
This document contains the record of proceedings from the Supreme Court of India regarding a writ petition on the issue of whether the Parliament or State Legislatures have the power to legislate on minority communities.
The Court notes conflicting statements have been made regarding these powers. It orders the Central Government to undertake necessary consultations with State Governments and stakeholders to finalize the issues raised.
Two applications seeking intervention in the case from organizations related to minorities in Meghalaya were dismissed, but with liberty granted for the organizations to make representations to authorities for consideration. The matter is listed for further directions on August 30th.
1. The document amends rules regarding the issuance of caste certificates in Telangana state.
2. It replaces the list of scheduled castes and tribes in previous orders to match the updated lists in the national Constitution and Andhra Pradesh Reorganization Act.
3. It changes the competent authorities who can issue certificates for different castes and tribes, with tahsildars now authorized to issue most certificates within their mandal jurisdiction instead of higher revenue officials.
सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने यह भी माना था कि मजिस्ट्रेट का यह कर्तव्य है कि वह सुनिश्चित करे कि अधिकारी पीएमएलए के तहत निर्धारित प्रक्रिया के साथ-साथ संवैधानिक सुरक्षा उपायों का भी उचित रूप से पालन करें।
More Related Content
Similar to Two orders judgments passed by hon'ble high court in cases filed by kpss
1. The petitioner, an advocate, filed a PIL claiming the Kerala state government is discriminating against minority communities in India by favoring Muslims over other minorities like Christians in various socio-economic empowerment schemes.
2. The petitioner argues that as per the Indian constitution and the National Commission for Minorities Act, the central government notifies six religious communities as minorities, including Muslims, Christians, Sikhs, Buddhists, Zoroastrians and Jains, and schemes should benefit all equally without favoring any one.
3. However, various orders of the Kerala government, like the 80:20 reservation ratio in one order, arbitrarily favor Muslims over Latin Catholic and converted Christian minorities without any valid rationale, violating
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss.For real time update Visit our social media handle.Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace.Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
The Kashmiri Pandit Sangarash Samiti is undertaking a second phase of a fast-unto-death protest to demand that the Jammu and Kashmir UT Administration fulfill assurances made on September 30th, 2020 to consider their demands on priority. Their demands include implementing government orders and High Court directions regarding jobs for educated Kashmiri Pandit/Hindu youth, financial aid and accommodation for 808 non-migrant Pandit/Hindu families in the Kashmir Valley, and extending migrant welfare benefits to non-migrants. Sanjay Tickoo, the President of KPSS, and activist Sandeep Koul have begun this second phase of fasting after over 50 days with no progress from the administration on their demands
1. The daily order from the High Court of Karnataka discusses issues related to migrant workers in the state during the COVID-19 pandemic.
2. It notes the responses from the state and central governments and identifies further actions needed to assist migrant workers wishing to return to their home states, including ensuring they are informed of transportation options and addressing any inability to pay train fares.
3. The order also seeks additional details from the Bangalore Metro Rail Corporation on measures taken to support its workers during the pandemic, including on food, wages, and compliance with prior court directions.
The document is the response from the Minister of State in the Ministry of Home Affairs to an unstarred question asked in Lok Sabha regarding the National Register of Citizens (NRC) in Assam. The key points are:
1) The final NRC was published on August 31, 2019 excluding over 19 lakh people but included over 3.11 crore people.
2) The decision regarding eligibility of 'D' voters and their descendants has been kept on hold by the Supreme Court.
3) A separate list of excluded Gorkhas was not published.
3) Anyone excluded has 120 days to file an appeal with the Foreigners Tribunals. The government has established 200 additional tribun
The document is a response from the Minister of State in the Ministry of Home Affairs to an unstarred question in the Lok Sabha regarding illegal immigrants in India and Karnataka.
It states that detection and deportation of illegal migrants is an ongoing process led by the Central Government. While the Central Government has the power to deport illegal foreign nationals, these powers have been delegated to State Governments. Consolidated instructions on deportation have been issued to States.
The State of Karnataka has informed that they are in the process of establishing a detention/holding center for illegal immigrants. There is no accurate data on the total number of illegal migrants as they enter clandestinely, but Karnataka has reported 143
The applicants, who are Dalit-Bahujan-Adivasi activists and journalists, have filed this intervention application in the ongoing public interest litigation regarding the Hathras gang rape and murder case. They seek to provide insights on caste-based atrocities against Dalits, especially Dalit women, and barriers they face in accessing justice. The application notes that Uttar Pradesh has the highest number of cases under the SC/ST Prevention of Atrocities Act but has failed to properly implement the Act, such as identifying atrocity-prone areas or formulating contingency plans as required. It aims to highlight the systemic discrimination and lack of protection faced by Dalits in Uttar Pradesh.
Guj hc order rejecting modification of rath yatra ordersabrangsabrang
This document discusses several applications filed before the Gujarat High Court related to the Rath Yatra festival in Ahmedabad amid the COVID-19 pandemic. The High Court had previously ordered that there will be no Rath Yatra procession this year. One application sought to modify this order to allow a symbolic procession with just 3 chariots and no public involvement. The Court notes that the temple trust has now said the chariots will only move within the temple premises and there will be no traditional city-wide procession.
10 may 28th suo moto migrant crisis interim ordersabrangsabrang
This document outlines the proceedings of the Supreme Court of India regarding problems faced by migrant workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. It notes that several states have responded to notices issued by the court and an initial report was submitted by the central government. During hearings, the court issued interim directions to central and state governments to provide free transport and food to migrant workers and simplify registration processes. The court ordered governments to submit additional details regarding support for migrant workers.
The document provides a historical overview of Jammu and Kashmir from ancient times up until August 2019. Some key points:
- Kashmir has a long Buddhist history dating back to emperor Ashoka in the 3rd century BC. Buddhism flourished under king Kanishka in the 1st century AD.
- In the 14th century, Shah Mir established the first Muslim dynasty in Kashmir, though many Hindu rulers preceded him. The Mughals ruled Kashmir from the 16th century onwards.
- In August 2019, the Indian government revoked Article 370 of the constitution, eliminating the special autonomous status of Jammu and Kashmir and dividing it into two union territories. This was a major political and constitutional
The Government of India approved a proposal to provide 3000 additional state government jobs and 6000 transit accommodations for Kashmiri migrants at an estimated cost of Rs. 2000 Crore. India will fund the jobs and land acquisition costs. The jobs will go to migrant families who left or stayed during the 1990s violence. India requested Jammu and Kashmir send a detailed implementation plan and monthly progress reports. Expenditure will be covered under Security Related Expenditure.
First india ahmedabad edition-30 july 2020FIRST INDIA
Welcome to the Official Website of First India E-Paper. We are the best ENGLISH NEWS PAPER in India with Special coverage of Rajasthan & Gujrat. Follow us for the LATEST NEWS & Top LIVE NEWS in India and around the world.
Visit:- https://www.firstindia.co.in/
The document is a court judgment from the Gauhati High Court regarding a public interest litigation (PIL) petition filed by Debabrata Saikia concerning evictions of approximately 700 families in the Sipajhar area of Assam for an agro farm project. The court heard from the petitioner's counsel and the government counsel. While it will not interfere with the cabinet decision for the project, it notes around 600 families have already been resettled but around 100 families remain without rehabilitation. The court orders these 100 families to apply to the Deputy Commissioner within 6 months for land allotment, who must pass individual reasoned orders on each application.
The document is a letter from the All Assam Minorities Students' Union to the Home Minister of India expressing views on the Citizenship Amendment Bill of 2019, the National Register of Citizens in Assam, and Clause 6 of the Assam Accord. It provides background on the Assam Agitation, Assam Accord, Citizenship Act amendments, Supreme Court cases related to NRC, and the process of preparing and publishing the NRC in Assam. It also discusses amendments made to exempt certain minority groups from Pakistan, Bangladesh and Afghanistan from prosecution if they entered India before 2014 due to religious persecution. Legal challenges to these amendments are pending before the Supreme Court.
Jammu and Kashmir - A new dawn of progress and peaceASO6KM
This document summarizes key developments in Jammu and Kashmir following the constitutional amendments removing Articles 370 and 35A in August 2019. It discusses improvements in security conditions, a reduction in terrorist activities, and expanded development initiatives in areas like tourism, industry, infrastructure, education, social welfare programs, and healthcare. Key political and administrative changes are also outlined, such as the establishment of a single cadre for civil servants, equal rights for all citizens, and rehabilitation support for migrants and refugees.
The document is an order from a High Court in India regarding an application for bail. It summarizes the following:
1) The applicant, Babita Sukar Kashyap, is seeking bail in connection with an FIR registered against her for offenses related to sedition, conspiracy, and causing enmity between groups.
2) She is alleged to have instigated followers of a tribal group in Gujarat to take violent action based on her interpretation of constitutional provisions. However, the prosecution has not clearly established her specific role or any actual violence.
3) The court observed that the applicant has been in custody for over a year, the key evidence is collected, and the prosecution has not shown any risk
Minorities Welfare Department – “ Shaadi Mubaarak Scheme” for extending
financial assistance of Rs.51,000/-(Rupees Fifty one thousand only) to each girl
belonging to the Minority at the time of marriage residing at Telangana State -
Orders- Issued.
This document contains the record of proceedings from the Supreme Court of India regarding a writ petition on the issue of whether the Parliament or State Legislatures have the power to legislate on minority communities.
The Court notes conflicting statements have been made regarding these powers. It orders the Central Government to undertake necessary consultations with State Governments and stakeholders to finalize the issues raised.
Two applications seeking intervention in the case from organizations related to minorities in Meghalaya were dismissed, but with liberty granted for the organizations to make representations to authorities for consideration. The matter is listed for further directions on August 30th.
1. The document amends rules regarding the issuance of caste certificates in Telangana state.
2. It replaces the list of scheduled castes and tribes in previous orders to match the updated lists in the national Constitution and Andhra Pradesh Reorganization Act.
3. It changes the competent authorities who can issue certificates for different castes and tribes, with tahsildars now authorized to issue most certificates within their mandal jurisdiction instead of higher revenue officials.
Similar to Two orders judgments passed by hon'ble high court in cases filed by kpss (20)
सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने यह भी माना था कि मजिस्ट्रेट का यह कर्तव्य है कि वह सुनिश्चित करे कि अधिकारी पीएमएलए के तहत निर्धारित प्रक्रिया के साथ-साथ संवैधानिक सुरक्षा उपायों का भी उचित रूप से पालन करें।
Matthew Professional CV experienced Government LiaisonMattGardner52
As an experienced Government Liaison, I have demonstrated expertise in Corporate Governance. My skill set includes senior-level management in Contract Management, Legal Support, and Diplomatic Relations. I have also gained proficiency as a Corporate Liaison, utilizing my strong background in accounting, finance, and legal, with a Bachelor's degree (B.A.) from California State University. My Administrative Skills further strengthen my ability to contribute to the growth and success of any organization.
Guide on the use of Artificial Intelligence-based tools by lawyers and law fi...Massimo Talia
This guide aims to provide information on how lawyers will be able to use the opportunities provided by AI tools and how such tools could help the business processes of small firms. Its objective is to provide lawyers with some background to understand what they can and cannot realistically expect from these products. This guide aims to give a reference point for small law practices in the EU
against which they can evaluate those classes of AI applications that are probably the most relevant for them.
Sangyun Lee, 'Why Korea's Merger Control Occasionally Fails: A Public Choice ...Sangyun Lee
Presentation slides for a session held on June 4, 2024, at Kyoto University. This presentation is based on the presenter’s recent paper, coauthored with Hwang Lee, Professor, Korea University, with the same title, published in the Journal of Business Administration & Law, Volume 34, No. 2 (April 2024). The paper, written in Korean, is available at <https://shorturl.at/GCWcI>.
What are the common challenges faced by women lawyers working in the legal pr...lawyersonia
The legal profession, which has historically been male-dominated, has experienced a significant increase in the number of women entering the field over the past few decades. Despite this progress, women lawyers continue to encounter various challenges as they strive for top positions.
Lifting the Corporate Veil. Power Point Presentationseri bangash
"Lifting the Corporate Veil" is a legal concept that refers to the judicial act of disregarding the separate legal personality of a corporation or limited liability company (LLC). Normally, a corporation is considered a legal entity separate from its shareholders or members, meaning that the personal assets of shareholders or members are protected from the liabilities of the corporation. However, there are certain situations where courts may decide to "pierce" or "lift" the corporate veil, holding shareholders or members personally liable for the debts or actions of the corporation.
Here are some common scenarios in which courts might lift the corporate veil:
Fraud or Illegality: If shareholders or members use the corporate structure to perpetrate fraud, evade legal obligations, or engage in illegal activities, courts may disregard the corporate entity and hold those individuals personally liable.
Undercapitalization: If a corporation is formed with insufficient capital to conduct its intended business and meet its foreseeable liabilities, and this lack of capitalization results in harm to creditors or other parties, courts may lift the corporate veil to hold shareholders or members liable.
Failure to Observe Corporate Formalities: Corporations and LLCs are required to observe certain formalities, such as holding regular meetings, maintaining separate financial records, and avoiding commingling of personal and corporate assets. If these formalities are not observed and the corporate structure is used as a mere façade, courts may disregard the corporate entity.
Alter Ego: If there is such a unity of interest and ownership between the corporation and its shareholders or members that the separate personalities of the corporation and the individuals no longer exist, courts may treat the corporation as the alter ego of its owners and hold them personally liable.
Group Enterprises: In some cases, where multiple corporations are closely related or form part of a single economic unit, courts may pierce the corporate veil to achieve equity, particularly if one corporation's actions harm creditors or other stakeholders and the corporate structure is being used to shield culpable parties from liability.
The Future of Criminal Defense Lawyer in India.pdfveteranlegal
https://veteranlegal.in/defense-lawyer-in-india/ | Criminal defense Lawyer in India has always been a vital aspect of the country's legal system. As defenders of justice, criminal Defense Lawyer play a critical role in ensuring that individuals accused of crimes receive a fair trial and that their constitutional rights are protected. As India evolves socially, economically, and technologically, the role and future of criminal Defense Lawyer are also undergoing significant changes. This comprehensive blog explores the current landscape, challenges, technological advancements, and prospects for criminal Defense Lawyer in India.
Genocide in International Criminal Law.pptxMasoudZamani13
Excited to share insights from my recent presentation on genocide! 💡 In light of ongoing debates, it's crucial to delve into the nuances of this grave crime.
Business law for the students of undergraduate level. The presentation contains the summary of all the chapters under the syllabus of State University, Contract Act, Sale of Goods Act, Negotiable Instrument Act, Partnership Act, Limited Liability Act, Consumer Protection Act.
The Art and Science of Cryptoforensic Investigation: Best Practices and Tools
Two orders judgments passed by hon'ble high court in cases filed by kpss
1. BEFORE THE HON'BLE
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT SRINAGAR
IITHE MATTER OF: CMPNo. /2016
In CMP No. 01/2015
In OWP NO. 1986/20 13
TITLED
Kashmiri Pandit Sangarash Samiti Through
Its President
Sanjay K. Tickoo, Age 45 years
S / o Late Kashi Nath Tickoo
R/o Sathu, Barbar Shah, Srinagar
Vicky Ganjoo, Age 30 years
S/o Late Hari Krishen Ganjoo
R/o Sathu Barbar Shah Srinagar Prestst
{if
Ms. Renu Thotha, Age 25 years76;.o..,_
D/o Satish Thotha
R/o Jawahir Nagar, Srinagar
4) Sandeep Koul, Age 26 years
S/o Late Pushkar Nath Koul Hinb )f
R/o Karfali Mohalla, Srinagar
Petitioners
V Versus
Union of India through its
Home Secretary,
Ministry of Home Affairs
New Delhi
Sate of Jammu and Kashmir through
Its Chief Secretary
State of Jammu and Kashmir
Civil Secretariat
Jammu / Srinagar
Commissioner Secretary to Government
Revenue Department,
State of Jammu and Kashmir,
Civil Secretariat
Jammu / Srinagar
Relief Commissioner (M)
State of Jammu and Kashmir
Jammu / Kashmir.
1
Annexure - E
2. MAY IT PLEASE YOUR LORDSHIPS
Most humbly petitioners submit as under:
1. That the Miscellaneous Petition alongwith Main
Petition tilted above is pending disposal before this
Hon'ble Court and in view of the observations of this
Hon'ble Court dated 09.09.2015 the Respondent
Government was asked to take a stand before this
Hon'ble Court in view of the Communication
addressed to Relief and Rehabilitation Commissioner
(M), J&K, Jammu by Special Secretary to the
Government, Relief and Rehabilitation Department for
extension of PM's Package to non-migrant youth
stationed inside the Valley. Copy of the same is
enclosed herewith for ready reference and is annexed
as Annexure - "A"
The respondent Government in view of the
communication addressed by the Ministry of Home
Affairs and information provided to the petitioners has
acknowledged the extension of PM's package to Non-
Migrant Kashmiri Pandits as a subsequent
development thereof. Copy of the same is enclosed
herewith as Annexure - "B".
That the petitioners, therefore, on the strength of the
reply to the RTI have now a strong prima facie case
and accordingly pray for reserving of 561 vacancies
from the Prime Minister's Package out of the existing
3000 vacancies created under PM Package.
That a formal representation Icommunication dated
28.01.2016 have also been submitted before His
Excellency Governor and a copy whereof has been
forwarded to Chief Secretary, State of J&K, Principal
Secretary to Government, Revenue Department and
Commissioner (M), Relief and Rehabilitation
Department but till date nothing has been done in this
3. EO
regard. Copy of the same is enclosed herewith as
Annexure - "C". In addition to that a memorandum
dated 14.03.20 16 has also been submitted to the Shri.
Kurshid Ahmad Ganai (lAS), Hon'ble Advisor to His
Excellency the Governor, State of Jammu and Kashmir
& Member, State Administrative Council. Copy of the
same is also annexed herewith as Annexure - "D".
That if the relief as has been prayed for is not granted
the petitioners will not only be non-suited but would
also allow the respondent state to go ahead with the
appointments as such resulting in grave mis-carriage
of justice and irreparable loss to the petitioners which
cannot not be compensated by any means of what so
ever nature.
This application is duly supported by an affidavit
sworn of its contents by the petitioners.
In the premises, it is accordingly prayed this
V k application be accepted and 561 vacancies may please be reserved
till final disposal of the petition. The same shall serve the ends of
jyQv'j justice. For which act of kindness the petitioners as re duty bound
V in law shall forever pray.
Petitioners
Through their Counsel
4. HIGII COURT OF JATIIUTLUIA,D I<ASIIMIR
AT,SRTN{GAR
-'.rt4,?
No. tg*6izot3
**'(***+**ii*****x
CMP Nos. ot/zot6 & or/zot5
Kashmiri Pandit
Coram:
.4ppearing counsel:
For Petitioner(s):
For Respondenl(s):
provision of Clarise 2(d) of SRO 412 read with Section 5
of sRo 412 dated 30-12-2009. The fonowing relief has
been sought by the petitionersl
i) That on the basis rtf the grbund which have been
taken up and reflected herein above, it would
manifest that Clause 2(d) of SR.O 4lZ dated 30_
12-2009 read wirh Secrion 5 of SRO 4L2 are
unconstitutional and therefore be declared ultra
virus to the Constitution {f India read with the
Constiturion of State of la$rnu and Kashmir are
being based on religion, place of residence and
treating people un-equaliq4 without applying the
test of intellectual differential.
ii) That a mandamus be also issued directing the
respondent state to alloru the petitioners along
wirh orher 56I aspirants from the Non-migrant
Kashmiri Pandit Community to apply in respect
of the Hon'ble Prime lfinisters' package.
The rwit petition has been filed in the year 2073.
for
I
II
i
the lretitioners states that a new
I
J
:
,
t,
t
of Order: 3llOj/ZOl6
Samiri tr's. Unfi;fhffi.
Ilon'ble Mr. Justice Ramalingam Sudhakar, Juclge.
It{i. Bilai
^hmad, b.cv. vice }fr. S. A }Iakroo. ASGL
The instant writ peti
Learned counsel
II
N
r
IE
N
t
,:ff
x-
l"lr. Saleem Gupkarj, Alv.
Mr. N. H. Shah, A{G.
Annexure - F
5. i
Polici' has been anncunced in
Right to Information Act
measures to Kashmti Pandits.
reprocluce Annexule B (Page 6): ,
Government of Jammu and Kashrnir
Relief and Rehabilitation Depa.rtment
Civil Secretariat, jammu/Sriangar
i
Shri Vijay Sas,
R/o 93/L, Malayar, l.lai Sarak,
Habba Kadal, Srinagar
No: R&RzRTI,/3 7 5 r'2 0 I 5
Subject: Application of Mr.
Sarak Habba Kadal,
With referente to your RTI
cited above and following
provide
information on the
follow up action
taken till date in light
of Cabinet decision:
The Cabinet further
desired :hat the
Revenue Department
should immediatelY
rvork out an
employment Package
for Kashmir
Minorities who did
not migra.te on the
same lines as is
available to the
Kashmi-ri lrligrants.' "
> I
)6
of darification issued
proi/ides all relief
be appropriate to
dated 21-12-2015
Sas R,/o 93/1, Malayar Nai
regarding the subject
is heieby finished:
(Sidharath Dhiman)
under Secretary to Government
Relief & Rehabilitation Department
funding of additional 3000 State
Government jobs. The Kashmiri
Paddit families rvho did not leave
the Kasttnir valleY during the
terrorist violence, that began in
the State in earlY 1990s and who
are still residing in the Kashmir
Valley, will also be eligible for the
these iobs and PreferablY formula
of one job Per familY is to be
adopted.
Relief Commissioner (Migrant)'
Jammu has been requested vide
ietter No. RAR/Rehab/ CSC/I9
/20I5 dated l6-I2-2015 to work
out modalities for creation of 3000
adhitionat supernumerary post for
faBhmir Migrants alongwith
fiilancial implications involved
afier examining the roadmaP
follolved while creation of earlier
3000 suPernumera.ry Posts under
Covernment of India has
norr;Ut" Prime Minister's Package'
i
i
:
I
II
I
i
t
l
I
I
I
6. E'-:l---
ii,
ln response to that petitioners have also requested
' q'il Excellencl', Go'rernor, State of Jammti and Kashmir
(:)
ted 28-01-2016 (Annerure
Rajbau'an, Jammu bY letter dat
C). learned counsel for the petitioners states that a
memorandum dated 14-03-2016 (Annexure D) is also
subrnittedtoJenabKhurshidAhmadGanai(IAS)'Hon'ble
Advisor to His Excellency the Governor & Member' State
Administrative Council'
Learned coutlsel for the petitioners states that
fia' '=--- or trte 'lLpetitioners rt'ould feel satisfied' in case Lclalm
petidoners is considered by 4'h respondent in light of the
reply glven in the Right to Informadon Act referred to
supra.
In liglrt of the above' the instant writ petition is
d.isposed of rvith a direction to 4'h respondent to
consider the claim of the petitioners in accord'ance with
the rules' Let such decision be taken preferably within a
period of six rveeks from the date of receipt of copy of
this order.
il
'N,^
eryr"k
7. '/ ' ,'. : . ;
qL
BEFORE THE HON'BLE
HrcH couRT oF JAMMu AND KA;nrrrn AT SRTNAGAR
***
In t]le Case oi
OIf,P No. t9B6l20to
Kashmiri pandit Sangarsh Samiti Through
its President
lanjaV K. Tickoo; Age 45 years
S/o Late Kashi Nath Tickoo
R/o Sathu, Barbar Shah, Srinagar
Vicky Ganjoo; Age 30 years
S/o late Hari Krishen Ganjoo
R/o Sathu Barbar Shah, Srinagar
Ms. Renu Thotha; 25 years
D/o Satish Thotha
R/o Jawahir Nagar; Srinagar
Sandeep Koul; Age 26years
S/o Late Pushkar Nath koul
R/o Karfalli Mohalla, Srinagar
Petitioaers
Versus
Anion of Indta through tts
Home Secretatg
Ministry of Home Affairs
New Delhi
State of Jannmu and Kashmlr through
its ChteJ Secretary
State of Jammu and Kashmir
Civil Secretariat
Jammu / Srinagar
Commissioner Secretary to Governnent
Revenue Department,
State of Jammu and Kashmir,
Civil Secretariat
Jammu / Srinagar
Relief Commissioner (M
State of Jammu and Kashmir
Jammu /Kashmir
Respondents
1)
2)
3)
4)
1)
2l
3)
4l
L-
i
:
!
e
:
8. HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR
AT SRINAGAR
WP(C) No. 2266/2019
CM No. 4250/2019
Kashmir Pandit Sangarash Samiti and Ors
…Petitioner(s).
Through: Mr. Saleem Gupkari, Adv. &
Mr. Gowhar Jan, Adv.
Vs.
State of JK and Others
…Respondent(s)
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tashi Rabstan, Judge.
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the case in hand is
squarely covered by the Judgment passed in OWP NO. 1986/2013 dated 13th
May, 2013 and seeks disposal of the writ petition in hand at the thresh hold
on the same lines and directions. His statement is taken on record.
At request, writ petition is accordingly disposed of with a direction to
respondents to consider the claim as projected by the petitioners in this
petition having regard to the judgment referred hereinabove provided the
same is applicable in the case in hand.
Let the respondents take decision in the matter within a period of six
weeks from the date copy of this order along with the complete paper book
including paper book of OWP No. 1986/2013 is supplied to the respondents.
Disposed of as above along with connected CM(s).
(Tashi Rabstan)
Judge
Srinagar
02.07.2019
Imtiyaz
Annexure - G