EU’s In Vitro Diagnostic Medical Device Regulation
A quick guide to the new IVDR.
The EU’s in vitro diagnostic medical device
regulation
Manufacturers of in vitro diagnostic medical devices
seeking market access to the European Union (EU)
will soon face major changes in the EU’s decades-old
regulatory framework. The EU’s In vitro diagnostic
medical device regulation (IVDR) was officially
published on 5 May 2017 and came into force on
26 May 2017. The IVDR will replace the EU’s current
directive on in vitro diagnostic medical devices
(98/79/EC).
EU Medical Device Regulation: Preparing for Disruptive (yet Incomplete) Regu...YourEncoreInc
The new EU Medical Device Regulation (MDR) represents one of the most disruptive changes to impact the global medical technology sector in recent times.
But with the regulations not finalized, three years to comply, and overall fatigue on the topic, what are the appropriate steps companies should take today to prepare?
In this session, Minnie Baylor-Henry and Jon Lange will briefly outline the current state of EU MDR, its likely impact to medtech company strategy and compliance requirements, and provide appropriate steps companies should take today to prepare.
About Minnie Baylor-Henry, J.D.: Minnie Baylor-Henry, J.D. is a Strategic Advisor to YourEncore and the Medical Devices Practice Lead. Prior to assuming her current role in 2015, she was the Worldwide Vice-President for Regulatory Affairs for Johnson & Johnson’s (J&J) Medical Devices & Diagnostics business.
About Jon Lange: Jon Lange is a Principal in the Advisory Services practice of EY and its EU MDR lead. He has spent 25+ years leading strategic growth initiatives and business transformation change programs for large and mid-tier life science companies.
Post-Market Clinical Follow Up Studies Under EU MDR and IVDREMMAIntl
On May 5, 2017, the Active Implantable Medical Devices Directive (90/385/EEC — AIMD) and the Medical Devices Directive (93/42/EEC — MDD) were replaced by the Medical Device Regulations (MDR) 2017/745, and the In-Vitro Diagnostic Medical Devices Directive (89/79/EC — IVDD) was replaced by the In-Vitro Diagnostic Regulations (IVDR) 2017/746.
Both of these new regulations put a heavy emphasis on post-market surveillance activities for a product. Post-market clinical follow-up studies, or performance studies as called in the IVDR, are an integral part of the post-market surveillance requirements of the newly released regulations. PMCF studies must be initiated by the manufacturer...
EU Medical Device Regulation: Preparing for Disruptive (yet Incomplete) Regu...YourEncoreInc
The new EU Medical Device Regulation (MDR) represents one of the most disruptive changes to impact the global medical technology sector in recent times.
But with the regulations not finalized, three years to comply, and overall fatigue on the topic, what are the appropriate steps companies should take today to prepare?
In this session, Minnie Baylor-Henry and Jon Lange will briefly outline the current state of EU MDR, its likely impact to medtech company strategy and compliance requirements, and provide appropriate steps companies should take today to prepare.
About Minnie Baylor-Henry, J.D.: Minnie Baylor-Henry, J.D. is a Strategic Advisor to YourEncore and the Medical Devices Practice Lead. Prior to assuming her current role in 2015, she was the Worldwide Vice-President for Regulatory Affairs for Johnson & Johnson’s (J&J) Medical Devices & Diagnostics business.
About Jon Lange: Jon Lange is a Principal in the Advisory Services practice of EY and its EU MDR lead. He has spent 25+ years leading strategic growth initiatives and business transformation change programs for large and mid-tier life science companies.
Post-Market Clinical Follow Up Studies Under EU MDR and IVDREMMAIntl
On May 5, 2017, the Active Implantable Medical Devices Directive (90/385/EEC — AIMD) and the Medical Devices Directive (93/42/EEC — MDD) were replaced by the Medical Device Regulations (MDR) 2017/745, and the In-Vitro Diagnostic Medical Devices Directive (89/79/EC — IVDD) was replaced by the In-Vitro Diagnostic Regulations (IVDR) 2017/746.
Both of these new regulations put a heavy emphasis on post-market surveillance activities for a product. Post-market clinical follow-up studies, or performance studies as called in the IVDR, are an integral part of the post-market surveillance requirements of the newly released regulations. PMCF studies must be initiated by the manufacturer...
Changing medical device regulations in Europe and the U.S.Maetrics
Topics covered at our recent ABHI (UK) event. Slides cover the reprocessing of single-use devices, the benefits of unique device identification, and supporting clinical evidence.
Changes in device classification under the EU Medical Devices and In Vitro Di...Erik Vollebregt
Presentation at the Q1 Intensive MDR/IVDR Readiness
and Transition Management Workshop about classification changes under the EU Medical Devices and In Vitro Diagnostic Regulation
Medical Device Regulation (MDR) overview for Technion, May 25, 2021Levi Shapiro
On May 26, 2021, the EU introduced the most sweeping changes to the Medical Device legal framework since the mid 90's. Ulf Grundmann, Senior Partner, King & Spalding (Frankfurt), reviews some of these regulatory changes, from the perspective of medical device innovators. The presentation includes Scope and Definitions, Classification and Conformity Assessment, Placing a Device on the EU Market, UDI and EUDAMED, Supply Chain Obligations, PMS and Vigilance
The EU’s medical device regulation
Medical device manufacturers seeking market access
to the European Union (EU) will soon face major changes
in the EU’s decades-old regulatory framework. The EU’s
Medical Device Regulation (MDR) was officially published
on 5 May 2017 and came into force on 25 May 2017.
The MDR will replace the EU’s current Medical Device
Directive (93/42/EEC) and the EU’s Directive on active
implantable medical devices (90/385/EEC).
Understanding Post-market Surveillance under EU MDR: Being Proactive, not Rea...Greenlight Guru
While the enforcement of EU MDR might have been delayed another year, your preparations addressing requirements for post-market surveillance (PMS) should not be! These new PMS requirements push manufacturers to take a more active role in monitoring of their devices to ensure that the benefit-risk profile of the device remains current. Performing PMS activities, according to the risk class of the device, requires a cross-functional team to ensure the required sources of data can be accessed and accurate data gathered. In this session, learn why it is important that PMS is not a one-size fits all approach, with considerations for risk of device, lifetime of device, time of the market, and more.
Talk takeaways:
• Understanding the new requirements of PMS under MDR
• What is the impact to the business?
• How do the requirements affect your current product lifecycle approach/QMS?
• Relationship between PMCF and PMS
• What to include in your plans and reports?
This session took place live at the Greenlight Guru True Quality Virtual Summit, a three-day event for medical device professionals to learn to get their devices to market faster, stay ahead of regulatory changes, and use quality as their multiplier to grow their device business.
Regulatory Approval Process for Medical Devices in EU - Presentation by Aksha...Akshay Anand
A presentation on Regulatory Approval Process for Medical Devices in European Union that explains in brief about the various aspects including the EU Medical Device Directives, Classifications, CE Certification, Medical Device Registration & Timelines. This was presented as a part of curriculum by Akshay Anand in JSS College of Pharmacy, Mysuru during January 2015
Presentation: Recall of Therapeutic GoodsTGA Australia
An introduction to conformity assessment procedures for medical devices, good manufacturing practice (GMP), some of the problems commonly experienced by sponsors and TGA, and helpful hints.
TGA Presentation: TGA focus and wrap up - What we've done, and what we still ...TGA Australia
An overview of the TGA's implementation of the recommendations made in the Review of Medicines and Medical Devices Regulation and other reforms for the IVD framework
Presentation: Conformity Assessment EvidenceTGA Australia
An introduction to conformity assessment procedures for medical devices, good manufacturing practice (GMP), some of the problems commonly experienced by sponsors and TGA, and helpful hints.
mHealth Israel_EU MedTech and eHealth Regulatory FrameworkLevi Shapiro
Presentation by Hogan Lovells, EU MedTech and eHealth Regulatory Framework. Best practices and key changes in the European medtech regulatory environment, 2018.
Changing medical device regulations in Europe and the U.S.Maetrics
Topics covered at our recent ABHI (UK) event. Slides cover the reprocessing of single-use devices, the benefits of unique device identification, and supporting clinical evidence.
Changes in device classification under the EU Medical Devices and In Vitro Di...Erik Vollebregt
Presentation at the Q1 Intensive MDR/IVDR Readiness
and Transition Management Workshop about classification changes under the EU Medical Devices and In Vitro Diagnostic Regulation
Medical Device Regulation (MDR) overview for Technion, May 25, 2021Levi Shapiro
On May 26, 2021, the EU introduced the most sweeping changes to the Medical Device legal framework since the mid 90's. Ulf Grundmann, Senior Partner, King & Spalding (Frankfurt), reviews some of these regulatory changes, from the perspective of medical device innovators. The presentation includes Scope and Definitions, Classification and Conformity Assessment, Placing a Device on the EU Market, UDI and EUDAMED, Supply Chain Obligations, PMS and Vigilance
The EU’s medical device regulation
Medical device manufacturers seeking market access
to the European Union (EU) will soon face major changes
in the EU’s decades-old regulatory framework. The EU’s
Medical Device Regulation (MDR) was officially published
on 5 May 2017 and came into force on 25 May 2017.
The MDR will replace the EU’s current Medical Device
Directive (93/42/EEC) and the EU’s Directive on active
implantable medical devices (90/385/EEC).
Understanding Post-market Surveillance under EU MDR: Being Proactive, not Rea...Greenlight Guru
While the enforcement of EU MDR might have been delayed another year, your preparations addressing requirements for post-market surveillance (PMS) should not be! These new PMS requirements push manufacturers to take a more active role in monitoring of their devices to ensure that the benefit-risk profile of the device remains current. Performing PMS activities, according to the risk class of the device, requires a cross-functional team to ensure the required sources of data can be accessed and accurate data gathered. In this session, learn why it is important that PMS is not a one-size fits all approach, with considerations for risk of device, lifetime of device, time of the market, and more.
Talk takeaways:
• Understanding the new requirements of PMS under MDR
• What is the impact to the business?
• How do the requirements affect your current product lifecycle approach/QMS?
• Relationship between PMCF and PMS
• What to include in your plans and reports?
This session took place live at the Greenlight Guru True Quality Virtual Summit, a three-day event for medical device professionals to learn to get their devices to market faster, stay ahead of regulatory changes, and use quality as their multiplier to grow their device business.
Regulatory Approval Process for Medical Devices in EU - Presentation by Aksha...Akshay Anand
A presentation on Regulatory Approval Process for Medical Devices in European Union that explains in brief about the various aspects including the EU Medical Device Directives, Classifications, CE Certification, Medical Device Registration & Timelines. This was presented as a part of curriculum by Akshay Anand in JSS College of Pharmacy, Mysuru during January 2015
Presentation: Recall of Therapeutic GoodsTGA Australia
An introduction to conformity assessment procedures for medical devices, good manufacturing practice (GMP), some of the problems commonly experienced by sponsors and TGA, and helpful hints.
TGA Presentation: TGA focus and wrap up - What we've done, and what we still ...TGA Australia
An overview of the TGA's implementation of the recommendations made in the Review of Medicines and Medical Devices Regulation and other reforms for the IVD framework
Presentation: Conformity Assessment EvidenceTGA Australia
An introduction to conformity assessment procedures for medical devices, good manufacturing practice (GMP), some of the problems commonly experienced by sponsors and TGA, and helpful hints.
mHealth Israel_EU MedTech and eHealth Regulatory FrameworkLevi Shapiro
Presentation by Hogan Lovells, EU MedTech and eHealth Regulatory Framework. Best practices and key changes in the European medtech regulatory environment, 2018.
Insights about changes to the EU's MDR (Medical Device Regulations) by Ulf Grundmann, Partner, King & Spalding, August 17, 2020. Includes scope and definitions, classification and conformity assessment, placing a device on the EU marketin, UDI and EUDAMED, supply chain obligations, PMS, compliance and vigilance.
EU Medical Device Regulatory Framework_Dec, 2022Levi Shapiro
Overview of the EU medical technology and digital health regulatory framework by Ulf Grundmann and Elisabeth Kohoutek of King & Spalding LLP. Topics include regulatory scope and definitions, classification and conformity assessment, placing a device on the EU Market, UDI and EUDAMED, Supply Chain Obligations, PMS and Vigilance. MDR covers diagnosis, prevention, monitoring, prediction, prognosis, treatment, or alleviation of a disease. ‘Medical Devices’ means any instrument, apparatus, appliance, software, implant, reagent, material or other article intended by the manufacturer to be used, alone or in combination, for human beings. The Regulation covers all devices for cleaning, sterilizing or disinfecting other medical devices, reprocessed single-use medical devices, and certain devices with no intended medical purpose.
Presentation on what it takes to get a clinical study off the ground in the UK along with some info on the impact of directive 2007/47/EC will have on clinical data requirements
PECB Webinar: Proposed changes for medical device quality management systems ...PECB
We will cover:
• Overview of proposed changes to ISO 13485:201X, MDSAP
• New EU regulations and unannounced audits
• New directions for QMS and regulatory audits
Presenter:
This webinar will be presented by Danny Kroo, the founder and principal consultant at Docusys Corporation.
Clinical evaluation report cer in a more stringent regulatory- Pepgra HealthcarePEPGRA Healthcare
European regulatory framework has established rules that govern the development, manufacturing, and marketing of medical devices in the European market. Both European and non-European medical device manufacturer’s fall under the purview of the regulatory framework, which is established to
provide condence to the clinicians and the patients that the medical devices and the implantable devices used in the region have been validated for their potential benets and certied as safe for usage.
New medical device regulation: implications for medical device manufacturersPEPGRA Healthcare
Pepgra offers regulatory consulting for Medical device and IVD companies. We help you in Market entry strategy, risk management, device classification and clinical evaluation reports. Let our team of regulatory experts work to ensure your compliance with all national regulations.
Learn More: https://www.pepgra.com/device-manufacturers/
Need Help:
Uk: +44- 7424810299
Email: sales@pepgra.com
Whatsapp: +91 9884350006
Presentation: Conformity assessment evidenceTGA Australia
An overview of Conformity Assessment requirements and General Safety and Performance Requirements and demonstrating compliance in the Australian context.
Similar to Tuv sud-ivdr-infosheet - EU’s In Vitro Diagnostic Medical Device Regulation (20)
Empowering ACOs: Leveraging Quality Management Tools for MIPS and BeyondHealth Catalyst
Join us as we delve into the crucial realm of quality reporting for MSSP (Medicare Shared Savings Program) Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs).
In this session, we will explore how a robust quality management solution can empower your organization to meet regulatory requirements and improve processes for MIPS reporting and internal quality programs. Learn how our MeasureAble application enables compliance and fosters continuous improvement.
Explore our infographic on 'Essential Metrics for Palliative Care Management' which highlights key performance indicators crucial for enhancing the quality and efficiency of palliative care services.
This visual guide breaks down important metrics across four categories: Patient-Centered Metrics, Care Efficiency Metrics, Quality of Life Metrics, and Staff Metrics. Each section is designed to help healthcare professionals monitor and improve care delivery for patients facing serious illnesses. Understand how to implement these metrics in your palliative care practices for better outcomes and higher satisfaction levels.
The Importance of Community Nursing Care.pdfAD Healthcare
NDIS and Community 24/7 Nursing Care is a specific type of support that may be provided under the NDIS for individuals with complex medical needs who require ongoing nursing care in a community setting, such as their home or a supported accommodation facility.
Navigating Challenges: Mental Health, Legislation, and the Prison System in B...Guillermo Rivera
This conference will delve into the intricate intersections between mental health, legal frameworks, and the prison system in Bolivia. It aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the current challenges faced by mental health professionals working within the legislative and correctional landscapes. Topics of discussion will include the prevalence and impact of mental health issues among the incarcerated population, the effectiveness of existing mental health policies and legislation, and potential reforms to enhance the mental health support system within prisons.
Antibiotic Stewardship by Anushri Srivastava.pptxAnushriSrivastav
Stewardship is the act of taking good care of something.
Antimicrobial stewardship is a coordinated program that promotes the appropriate use of antimicrobials (including antibiotics), improves patient outcomes, reduces microbial resistance, and decreases the spread of infections caused by multidrug-resistant organisms.
WHO launched the Global Antimicrobial Resistance and Use Surveillance System (GLASS) in 2015 to fill knowledge gaps and inform strategies at all levels.
ACCORDING TO apic.org,
Antimicrobial stewardship is a coordinated program that promotes the appropriate use of antimicrobials (including antibiotics), improves patient outcomes, reduces microbial resistance, and decreases the spread of infections caused by multidrug-resistant organisms.
ACCORDING TO pewtrusts.org,
Antibiotic stewardship refers to efforts in doctors’ offices, hospitals, long term care facilities, and other health care settings to ensure that antibiotics are used only when necessary and appropriate
According to WHO,
Antimicrobial stewardship is a systematic approach to educate and support health care professionals to follow evidence-based guidelines for prescribing and administering antimicrobials
In 1996, John McGowan and Dale Gerding first applied the term antimicrobial stewardship, where they suggested a causal association between antimicrobial agent use and resistance. They also focused on the urgency of large-scale controlled trials of antimicrobial-use regulation employing sophisticated epidemiologic methods, molecular typing, and precise resistance mechanism analysis.
Antimicrobial Stewardship(AMS) refers to the optimal selection, dosing, and duration of antimicrobial treatment resulting in the best clinical outcome with minimal side effects to the patients and minimal impact on subsequent resistance.
According to the 2019 report, in the US, more than 2.8 million antibiotic-resistant infections occur each year, and more than 35000 people die. In addition to this, it also mentioned that 223,900 cases of Clostridoides difficile occurred in 2017, of which 12800 people died. The report did not include viruses or parasites
VISION
Being proactive
Supporting optimal animal and human health
Exploring ways to reduce overall use of antimicrobials
Using the drugs that prevent and treat disease by killing microscopic organisms in a responsible way
GOAL
to prevent the generation and spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Doing so will preserve the effectiveness of these drugs in animals and humans for years to come.
being to preserve human and animal health and the effectiveness of antimicrobial medications.
to implement a multidisciplinary approach in assembling a stewardship team to include an infectious disease physician, a clinical pharmacist with infectious diseases training, infection preventionist, and a close collaboration with the staff in the clinical microbiology laboratory
to prevent antimicrobial overuse, misuse and abuse.
to minimize the developme
ICH Guidelines for Pharmacovigilance.pdfNEHA GUPTA
The "ICH Guidelines for Pharmacovigilance" PDF provides a comprehensive overview of the International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) guidelines related to pharmacovigilance. These guidelines aim to ensure that drugs are safe and effective for patients by monitoring and assessing adverse effects, ensuring proper reporting systems, and improving risk management practices. The document is essential for professionals in the pharmaceutical industry, regulatory authorities, and healthcare providers, offering detailed procedures and standards for pharmacovigilance activities to enhance drug safety and protect public health.
CRISPR-Cas9, a revolutionary gene-editing tool, holds immense potential to reshape medicine, agriculture, and our understanding of life. But like any powerful tool, it comes with ethical considerations.
Unveiling CRISPR: This naturally occurring bacterial defense system (crRNA & Cas9 protein) fights viruses. Scientists repurposed it for precise gene editing (correction, deletion, insertion) by targeting specific DNA sequences.
The Promise: CRISPR offers exciting possibilities:
Gene Therapy: Correcting genetic diseases like cystic fibrosis.
Agriculture: Engineering crops resistant to pests and harsh environments.
Research: Studying gene function to unlock new knowledge.
The Peril: Ethical concerns demand attention:
Off-target Effects: Unintended DNA edits can have unforeseen consequences.
Eugenics: Misusing CRISPR for designer babies raises social and ethical questions.
Equity: High costs could limit access to this potentially life-saving technology.
The Path Forward: Responsible development is crucial:
International Collaboration: Clear guidelines are needed for research and human trials.
Public Education: Open discussions ensure informed decisions about CRISPR.
Prioritize Safety and Ethics: Safety and ethical principles must be paramount.
CRISPR offers a powerful tool for a better future, but responsible development and addressing ethical concerns are essential. By prioritizing safety, fostering open dialogue, and ensuring equitable access, we can harness CRISPR's power for the benefit of all. (2998 characters)
Tuv sud-ivdr-infosheet - EU’s In Vitro Diagnostic Medical Device Regulation
1. The EU’s in vitro diagnostic medical device
regulation
Manufacturers of in vitro diagnostic medical devices
seeking market access to the European Union (EU)
will soon face major changes in the EU’s decades-old
regulatory framework. The EU’s In vitro diagnostic
medical device regulation (IVDR) was officially
published on 5 May 2017 and came into force on
26 May 2017. The IVDR will replace the EU’s current
directive on in vitro diagnostic medical devices
(98/79/EC).
Background
The origins of the proposed IVDR date back to 2008,
when the EU Commission initiated a public consultation
on the Community’s existing requirements covering
medical devices. A separate consultation conducted in
2010 on in vitro diagnostic medical devices generated
more than 180 comments and proposals for change
from a wide variety of stakeholders. As a result, the
Commission released in 2012 its plan to restructure the
EU’s medical device regulatory framework, along with
a proposed regulation that would replace the existing
Directive on in vitro diagnostic medical devices.
Since then, the EU’s key legislative institutions have
reviewed, commented and amended the proposed
IVDR in the first reading. A “trilogue” between the EU
Commission, the European Council and the European
Parliament to identify common positions took place and
achieved a consensus on May 25, 2016. It took almost
an additional year for legal and linguistic review,
restructure the text, smaller corrections, translations,
formal approval and publication.
The expected changes and their impact
The proposed IVDR differs in several important ways
from the EU’s current directive for in vitro diagnostic
medical devices. Specific details of these changes,
along with their anticipated impact, include:
TÜV SÜD
EU’s In Vitro
Diagnostic Medical
Device Regulation
A quick guide to the new IVDR
Choose certainty.
Add value.
2. Product scope expansion – The scope of in vitro
diagnostic devices covered under the IVDR is
expected to be expanded to include diagnostic
(including Internet-based) services, genetic testing
and other tests that provide information about a
patient’s predisposition for a specific disease or for
susceptibility for a medical treatment, as well as – by
changing of current rules for exemption - devices
manufactured for use within a single healthcare
institution. This increased product scope will mean
that many more manufacturers will be subject to EU
requirements for in vitro diagnostic devices.
Reclassification of devices according to risk – The
IVDR is expected to impose a classification structure
for in vitro diagnostic devices consistent with
that of the Global Harmonised Task Force (GHTF).
Risk classes will range from Class A for low risk
devices to Class D for those devices that pose the
greatest risk to patients, healthcare workers and
the public. Instead of lists, the regulation will also
provide specific rules for properly classifying in vitro
diagnostic devices according to their level of risk.
Except for Class A (low risk) devices, most in vitro
diagnostic devices ( than 70 percent) will require
some form of pre-market review and approval by a
Notified Body.
More rigorous clinical evidence requirements – The
IVDR will likely require device manufacturers to
conduct clinical performance studies and provide
evidence of safety and performance proportionate
with a device’s assigned risk class. In vitro diagnostic
device manufacturers will also be required to collect
and retain post-market clinical data as part of the
ongoing assessment of potential safety risks. For
manufacturers, these requirements will require
a significant investment of time and resources to
conduct the required studies and to maintain required
post-market documentation.
More stringent documentation – Technical
documentation of devices will be expected to meet
more detailed and strict new requirements. In vitro
diagnostic device manufacturers will need to review
existing documentation, and update or amend that
documentation as necessary to meet new content
requirements.
Identification of “person responsible for
regulatory compliance” – In vitro diagnostic device
manufacturers will be required to identify at least one
person within their organisation who is ultimately
responsible for all aspects of compliance with the
requirements of the new IVDR. The organisation
must document the specific qualifications of this
individual relative to the required tasks. Further,
qualifications of responsible persons will be subject
to review by Notified Bodies to ensure requisite
knowledge and skill.
3. Implementation of unique device identification
– The proposed IVDR mandates the use of unique
device identification (UDI) mechanisms. This
requirement is expected to increase the ability of
manufacturers and authorities to trace specific
devices through the supply chain, and to facilitate
the prompt and efficient recall of in vitro diagnostic
medical devices that have been found to present
a safety risk. To support this effort, the European
Databank on Medical Devices (Eudamed) is expected
to be expanded to provide more efficient access to
information on approved devices.
More rigorous surveillance by Notified Bodies – The
IVDR will increase surveillance of manufacturers
by Notified Bodies. Unannounced audits, along with
product sample checks and product testing will
strengthen the EU’s enforcement regime and help to
reduce risks from unsafe devices. Annual safety and
performance reporting by device manufacturers will
also be required for class C and D devices.
Greater Scrutiny of Notified Bodies – Competent
authorities and Reference Laboratories may have
to be involved in conformity assessment of high risk
devices which will result in elongated conformity
assessment procedures. Tighter designation rules
for Notified Bodies may lead to a reduced number of
Notified Bodies available.
No “grandfathering” provisions – Under the
IVDR, all currently approved in vitro diagnostic
devices must be recertified in accordance with
the new requirements. Manufacturers with
currently approved devices will have five years
to demonstrate compliance with the IVDR’s new
requirements.
The IVDR timeline
The IVDR was officially published on 5 May 2017 and
entered into force on 26 May 2017. Manufacturers
of currently approved medical devices will have a
transition time of five years until 26 May 2022 to
meet the requirements of the IVDR. Products already
certified by a Notified Body may be placed on the
market for further 2 years provided further conditions
are met.
It is important to note that, as an EU regulation,
the IVDR will have the force of law throughout the
EU when it comes into effect. This approach will
eliminate country-by-country interpretations of the
requirements permitted under current directives.
How you can prepare?
The new requirements in the IVDR, combined with the
complex development process for in vitro diagnostic
medical devices, is likely to make the transition a
complicated and time-consuming process for most
device manufacturers.
Because of these complexities, manufacturers of in
vitro diagnostic medical devices are well-advised to
stay current on the progress of the IVDR through the
legislative process, as well as additional changes that
may impact them. In addition, since a larger number
of medical devices, including in vitro diagnostic
medical devices, are expected to require Notified
Body review and approval, delays in the review and
approval process by Notified Body should be expected.
Manufacturers of currently approved devices are
therefore advised to consult with their respective
Notified Body to evaluate potential compliance issues
and to develop a plan to address them promptly.
Advanced preparation and early action will be key to
ensuring a smooth transition to the new requirements.