Resource Type: Brief
Authors: Megan Meline, Lisa Tarantino, Jeremy Kanthor, and Sharon Nakhimovsky
Published: September 2015
Resource Description: Getting access to affordable, quality health care is a universal story that touches virtually every family in the world. At the same time, providing quality health services and access to trained health professionals is a challenge for governments. The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that 150 million people worldwide face “catastrophic expenditure” because of high costs of health care. In other words, they may have to forgo paying for basic needs, such as food, housing, or education to pay for medical treatment instead. These costs include transportation, doctors’ fees, medicine, hospitalization bills, and days lost from work.
Behind these sobering statistics lies a wealth of news and feature stories waiting for the media to investigate and share with national leaders and policymakers as well as civil society groups who can advocate for changes to health budgets and policies. At the heart of these stories are important questions about the financing of health care and the quality of governance that ensures responsive and effective management of those resources and services.
But writing health finance and governance stories can be challenging. Health finance is riddled with complex language, technical economic terms, and numbers – not necessarily a journalist’s comfort zone. The right sources for these stories can be difficult to identify and unwilling to talk. Data may be difficult to locate or to understand. And while corruption makes for splashy headlines, the broader systemic challenges of health governance are not widely understood — and yet they are important.
The Health Finance and Governance Briefing Kit is designed to help journalists and their editors uncover and tell these important health stories that affect people all around the world.
Expanding Coverage to Informal Workers: A Study of EPCMD Countries’ Efforts t...HFG Project
For many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), expanding health coverage to informal workers is one of the most common, yet complex challenges requiring action. Informal workers are, by definition, not provided with legal or social protections through their employment, and are vulnerable to health and economic shocks. They also account for a large percentage of the population in LMICs. Expanding or deepening health coverage to informal workers is thus an area of interest for stakeholders pursuing universal health coverage (UHC): the goal that the entire population can access needed good-quality care without risk of impoverishment. Pro-poor coverage schemes that rely on prepayment – payment delinked from the time of care seeking – are a key financing strategy for UHC (WHO 2010). However, including informal workers in such schemes is challenging given that informal workers are not typically registered in taxation systems and social protection systems, nor covered by labor laws and regulations, making them less visible to the government and other stakeholders (Rockefeller Foundation 2013).
This report complements existing literature on how health reforms can improve the welfare of informal workers, focusing on the 25 countries prioritized for development assistance by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) as part of its Ending Preventable Child and Maternal Deaths (EPCMD) initiative. Given the strong interest in these questions among EPCMD countries, USAID commissioned the Health Finance and Governance project (HFG) to conduct this research and provide recommendations relevant to UHC policy discussions in these countries.
Improving Efficiency to Achieve Health System Goals in Botswana: Background P...HFG Project
Health outcomes have improved in Botswana over the last few decades. These successes have come at the same time as overall macroeconomic growth, with annual Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth averaging around 6 percent between 2010 and 2015 (IMF 2015), and Human Development Index ranking above the regional average. These improvements originate in a strong health service delivery system. In 2008, Botswana’s public health system included 338 health posts and 277 health clinics, sufficient to ensure that at least 80 percent of the population has coverage of essential, high-impact services. Management of these services was initially done by the Ministry of Local Government but has been transferred to district health teams under the Ministry of Health (MOH). As of 2008, Botswana’s public health system also had 17 primary hospitals, 14 district hospitals, two referral hospitals, and one mental health hospital; these hospitals are managed by the central government.
Getting Health’s Slice of the Pie: Domestic Resource Mobilization for HealthHFG Project
Many low- and middle-income countries have experienced strong economic growth in recent years, resulting in increased capacity for social sector spending. Net energy importers have further benefited from falling fossil fuel prices. At the same time donors are preparing to scale back development assistance, including support for global health initiatives. Responding to a lack of practical guidance on how countries can mobilize more domestic resources for the health sector, the Health Finance and Governance (HFG) project organized a series of joint learning workshops to promote knowledge exchange, share new and existing resources, and support countries in a DRM-for-health action planning process.
Capital Investment in Health Systems: What is the latest thinking?HFG Project
Capital investment in health typically refers to large expenditures in construction of hospitals and other facilities, investment in diagnostic and treatment technologies, and information technology platforms. These investments are characterized by their longevity and they are critical to efforts to improve healthcare quality and efficiency. Contrary to developed countries where there is well documented experience on capital investment in the health sector, including use of public private partnerships for the investment; there is little evidence on capital investment in health from low and middle income countries.
This work was undertaken to add to the HFG’s knowledge and learning strategy by clarifying what good practice guidance exists in capital benchmark in LMICs health sectors, as well as the HFG project’s experience in the area. This brief will be of value to all those interested in the planning and financing the capital investment in the health sector. This includes politicians, planners, managers, health professionals, architects, designers, and researchers in both the public and private sectors.
Health Trends in the Middle East and North AfricaHFG Project
In the past several decades, countries in the Middle East and North Africa have made significant improvements in developing their health systems and improving the health status of their populations. However, the region continues to face substantial and diverse political, economic, social, and health challenges: a rise in the burden of noncommunicable diseases, ongoing conflicts in several countries, and refugee crises. To inform future USAID health investments in the Middle East and North Africa, the Sustaining Health Outcomes through the Private Sector (SHOPS) Plus project and the Health Financing and Governance (HFG) project conducted an analysis of the private health sector and the health financing landscape from January 2017 to April 2018. The countries included in this analysis are Algeria, Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, Lebanon, Libya, Morocco, Syria, Tunisia, the West Bank and Gaza, and Yemen.
HFG began working in Namibia in 2013, closely partnering with the Namibian Ministry of Health and Social Services and going on to collaborate with key government agencies, such as the Namibian Social Security Commission and the Universal Health
Coverage Advisory Committee of Namibia. The overarching aim of our technical assistance has been to support Namibia’s progress toward UHC to ensure all can access necessary, quality health care without financial struggle. We emphasized a government-led and -owned approach as we supported the Namibian government in addressing some of the key challenges it faced at the start of the project.
HFG’s support has helped strengthen the government’s capacity to mobilize and manage resources; improve efficiency, quality, and equity of health services; expand access to health care; sustain key health interventions, especially the HIV/AIDS prevention, care, and treatment program; and, ultimately, identify sustainable financing for UHC. We provided technical support to the Namibian government’s Health Accounts team, equipping them with tools and know-how to lead and implement four Health Accounts exercises and analyze and present data for better policy analysis and evidence-based decision making. Our support has helped institutionalize Health Accounts in Namibia and provided the country’s policymakers with evidence to examine health financing options for UHC, advocate for greater resources, and explore financial risk protection options.
Strengthening the larger health system and generating fiscal space through improved efficiency of health services was another important goal for HFG.
Findings of the health facility costing and district hospital efficiency study we undertook will enable the government to identify where it can save resources, how it can improve equity in service distribution, and what Namibia’s total financing requirement is for UHC.
This report highlights some of the major contributions HFG and its key partners have made toward more efficient use of limited health resources, improved sustainability of
health programs, and progress toward UHC in Namibia.
Monitoring progress towards universal health coverage at country and global l...The Rockefeller Foundation
A movement towards universal health coverage (UHC) – ensuring that everyone who needs health services is able to get them, without undue financial hardship – has been growing across the globe (1). This has led to a sharp increase in the demand for expertise, evidence and measures of progress and a push to make UHC one of the goals of the post-2015 development agenda (2). This paper proposes a framework for tracking country and global progress towards UHC; its aim is to inform and guide these discussions and assessment of both aggregate and equitable coverage of essential health services as well as financial protection. Monitoring progress towards these two components of UHC will be complementary and critical to achieving desirable health outcome goals, such as ending preventable deaths and promoting healthy life expectancy and also reducing poverty and protecting household incomes.
This paper was written jointly by the World Health Organization (WHO) and The World Bank Group on the basis of consultations and discussions with country representatives, technical experts and global health and development partners (3). A draft of this paper was posted online and circulated widely for consultation between December 2013 and February 2014. Nearly 70 submissions were received from countries, development partners, civil society, academics and other interested stakeholders. The feedback was synthesized and reviewed at a meeting of country and global experts in Bellagio, Italy, in March 2014 (4). The paper was modified to reflect the views emerging from these consultations.
Haryana 2014/15 State Health Accounts: Main ReportHFG Project
This report presents the findings and policy implications of Haryana’s first Health Accounts (HA) estimation, for fiscal year April 2014 through March 2015. The estimation was conducted using the most recent Systems of Health Accounts (SHA) framework, which was updated in 2011. HA capture spending from all sources: central- and state-level governments, non-governmental organizations, external donors, private employers, insurance companies, and households. The analysis breaks down spending into the standard classifications defined by the SHA 2011 framework, namely, sources of financing, financing schemes, financing agent, type of provider, type of activity, and disease/ health condition.
Expanding Coverage to Informal Workers: A Study of EPCMD Countries’ Efforts t...HFG Project
For many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), expanding health coverage to informal workers is one of the most common, yet complex challenges requiring action. Informal workers are, by definition, not provided with legal or social protections through their employment, and are vulnerable to health and economic shocks. They also account for a large percentage of the population in LMICs. Expanding or deepening health coverage to informal workers is thus an area of interest for stakeholders pursuing universal health coverage (UHC): the goal that the entire population can access needed good-quality care without risk of impoverishment. Pro-poor coverage schemes that rely on prepayment – payment delinked from the time of care seeking – are a key financing strategy for UHC (WHO 2010). However, including informal workers in such schemes is challenging given that informal workers are not typically registered in taxation systems and social protection systems, nor covered by labor laws and regulations, making them less visible to the government and other stakeholders (Rockefeller Foundation 2013).
This report complements existing literature on how health reforms can improve the welfare of informal workers, focusing on the 25 countries prioritized for development assistance by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) as part of its Ending Preventable Child and Maternal Deaths (EPCMD) initiative. Given the strong interest in these questions among EPCMD countries, USAID commissioned the Health Finance and Governance project (HFG) to conduct this research and provide recommendations relevant to UHC policy discussions in these countries.
Improving Efficiency to Achieve Health System Goals in Botswana: Background P...HFG Project
Health outcomes have improved in Botswana over the last few decades. These successes have come at the same time as overall macroeconomic growth, with annual Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth averaging around 6 percent between 2010 and 2015 (IMF 2015), and Human Development Index ranking above the regional average. These improvements originate in a strong health service delivery system. In 2008, Botswana’s public health system included 338 health posts and 277 health clinics, sufficient to ensure that at least 80 percent of the population has coverage of essential, high-impact services. Management of these services was initially done by the Ministry of Local Government but has been transferred to district health teams under the Ministry of Health (MOH). As of 2008, Botswana’s public health system also had 17 primary hospitals, 14 district hospitals, two referral hospitals, and one mental health hospital; these hospitals are managed by the central government.
Getting Health’s Slice of the Pie: Domestic Resource Mobilization for HealthHFG Project
Many low- and middle-income countries have experienced strong economic growth in recent years, resulting in increased capacity for social sector spending. Net energy importers have further benefited from falling fossil fuel prices. At the same time donors are preparing to scale back development assistance, including support for global health initiatives. Responding to a lack of practical guidance on how countries can mobilize more domestic resources for the health sector, the Health Finance and Governance (HFG) project organized a series of joint learning workshops to promote knowledge exchange, share new and existing resources, and support countries in a DRM-for-health action planning process.
Capital Investment in Health Systems: What is the latest thinking?HFG Project
Capital investment in health typically refers to large expenditures in construction of hospitals and other facilities, investment in diagnostic and treatment technologies, and information technology platforms. These investments are characterized by their longevity and they are critical to efforts to improve healthcare quality and efficiency. Contrary to developed countries where there is well documented experience on capital investment in the health sector, including use of public private partnerships for the investment; there is little evidence on capital investment in health from low and middle income countries.
This work was undertaken to add to the HFG’s knowledge and learning strategy by clarifying what good practice guidance exists in capital benchmark in LMICs health sectors, as well as the HFG project’s experience in the area. This brief will be of value to all those interested in the planning and financing the capital investment in the health sector. This includes politicians, planners, managers, health professionals, architects, designers, and researchers in both the public and private sectors.
Health Trends in the Middle East and North AfricaHFG Project
In the past several decades, countries in the Middle East and North Africa have made significant improvements in developing their health systems and improving the health status of their populations. However, the region continues to face substantial and diverse political, economic, social, and health challenges: a rise in the burden of noncommunicable diseases, ongoing conflicts in several countries, and refugee crises. To inform future USAID health investments in the Middle East and North Africa, the Sustaining Health Outcomes through the Private Sector (SHOPS) Plus project and the Health Financing and Governance (HFG) project conducted an analysis of the private health sector and the health financing landscape from January 2017 to April 2018. The countries included in this analysis are Algeria, Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, Lebanon, Libya, Morocco, Syria, Tunisia, the West Bank and Gaza, and Yemen.
HFG began working in Namibia in 2013, closely partnering with the Namibian Ministry of Health and Social Services and going on to collaborate with key government agencies, such as the Namibian Social Security Commission and the Universal Health
Coverage Advisory Committee of Namibia. The overarching aim of our technical assistance has been to support Namibia’s progress toward UHC to ensure all can access necessary, quality health care without financial struggle. We emphasized a government-led and -owned approach as we supported the Namibian government in addressing some of the key challenges it faced at the start of the project.
HFG’s support has helped strengthen the government’s capacity to mobilize and manage resources; improve efficiency, quality, and equity of health services; expand access to health care; sustain key health interventions, especially the HIV/AIDS prevention, care, and treatment program; and, ultimately, identify sustainable financing for UHC. We provided technical support to the Namibian government’s Health Accounts team, equipping them with tools and know-how to lead and implement four Health Accounts exercises and analyze and present data for better policy analysis and evidence-based decision making. Our support has helped institutionalize Health Accounts in Namibia and provided the country’s policymakers with evidence to examine health financing options for UHC, advocate for greater resources, and explore financial risk protection options.
Strengthening the larger health system and generating fiscal space through improved efficiency of health services was another important goal for HFG.
Findings of the health facility costing and district hospital efficiency study we undertook will enable the government to identify where it can save resources, how it can improve equity in service distribution, and what Namibia’s total financing requirement is for UHC.
This report highlights some of the major contributions HFG and its key partners have made toward more efficient use of limited health resources, improved sustainability of
health programs, and progress toward UHC in Namibia.
Monitoring progress towards universal health coverage at country and global l...The Rockefeller Foundation
A movement towards universal health coverage (UHC) – ensuring that everyone who needs health services is able to get them, without undue financial hardship – has been growing across the globe (1). This has led to a sharp increase in the demand for expertise, evidence and measures of progress and a push to make UHC one of the goals of the post-2015 development agenda (2). This paper proposes a framework for tracking country and global progress towards UHC; its aim is to inform and guide these discussions and assessment of both aggregate and equitable coverage of essential health services as well as financial protection. Monitoring progress towards these two components of UHC will be complementary and critical to achieving desirable health outcome goals, such as ending preventable deaths and promoting healthy life expectancy and also reducing poverty and protecting household incomes.
This paper was written jointly by the World Health Organization (WHO) and The World Bank Group on the basis of consultations and discussions with country representatives, technical experts and global health and development partners (3). A draft of this paper was posted online and circulated widely for consultation between December 2013 and February 2014. Nearly 70 submissions were received from countries, development partners, civil society, academics and other interested stakeholders. The feedback was synthesized and reviewed at a meeting of country and global experts in Bellagio, Italy, in March 2014 (4). The paper was modified to reflect the views emerging from these consultations.
Haryana 2014/15 State Health Accounts: Main ReportHFG Project
This report presents the findings and policy implications of Haryana’s first Health Accounts (HA) estimation, for fiscal year April 2014 through March 2015. The estimation was conducted using the most recent Systems of Health Accounts (SHA) framework, which was updated in 2011. HA capture spending from all sources: central- and state-level governments, non-governmental organizations, external donors, private employers, insurance companies, and households. The analysis breaks down spending into the standard classifications defined by the SHA 2011 framework, namely, sources of financing, financing schemes, financing agent, type of provider, type of activity, and disease/ health condition.
Public Financial Management, Health Governance, and Health SystemsHFG Project
While the importance of governance in a health system is well recognized, there is an overall lack of evidence and understanding of the dynamics of how improved governance can influence health system performance and health outcomes. There is still considerable debate on which governance interventions are appropriate for different contexts. This lack of evidence can result in avoidance of health governance efforts or an over-reliance on a limited set of governance interventions. As development partners and governments are increasing their emphasis on improving accountability and transparency of health systems and strengthening country policies and institutions to move towards universal health coverage (UHC), the need of this evidence is ever rising.
To address this evidence gap, the USAID’s Office of Health Systems (USAID/GH/OHS), the World Health Organization (WHO), and the Health Finance and Governance (HFG) Project launched an initiative in September 2016 to ‘Marshall the Evidence’ on how governance contributes to health system performance and improves health outcomes.
The overall objective of the initiative was to increase awareness and understanding of the evidence of what works and why in how governance contributes to health system performance, and how the field of health governance is evolving at the country level. This report provides a synthesis of the findings across the four themes. This report presents the findings of the Public Financial Management.
Guide for the Monitoring and Evaluation of the Transition of Health ProgramsHFG Project
This guide looks at three different transition experiences (funding, technical assistance, and services) to demonstrate variations in the type of transition undertaken, and the corresponding need for M&E. The authors draw upon experience of monitoring and evaluating transition to clarify key elements and dimensions of transition and how they relate to the longer-term goal of program sustainability and to present possible indicators, relevant to different health programs and transition arrangements that can help track transition and offer suggestions on how to select appropriate indicators. This document provides a conceptual framework to guide thinking around the M&E of transitions and will be amended as experience grows.
Linkages Between the Essential Health Services Package and Government-Sponsor...HFG Project
Priority setting is a key function of health systems that seek to achieve universal health coverage. The Essential Health Services Package (EHSP) explicitly prioritizes certain services; government-sponsored health benefit plans implicitly prioritize others. To gain insights into the purpose, policy objectives, and governance of the EPHS and dominant health benefit plans in Ethiopia, we conducted a case study in 2016. Methods included a desk review of relevant documents and qualitative analysis of 15 key informant interviews of leading health finance experts in Addis Ababa. All data were coded and analyzed using a thematic inductive framework.
Using Evidence to Design Health Benefit Plans for Stronger Health Systems: Le...HFG Project
Low- and middle-income country governments face competing health priorities as they try to increase their populations’ access to affordable healthcare with limited resources. Faced with difficult choices, how can governments align their spending with health system objectives? One common policy instrument governments are using is the health benefit plan (HBP), defined here as a pre-determined, publicly managed list of guaranteed health services. Based on country experiences, the authors of this report argue that using evidence improves the potential for HBPs to achieve and balance countries’ objectives for equity, efficiency, financial protection, and sustainability in the health sector.
Governments using—or considering—HBPs as part of their pathway to UHC are faced with complex questions as they prepare to design new HBPs or update existing ones to address technological, epidemiological, economic, or other changes. This report is intended to serve as a resource for these governments. Through a review of 25 countries examining the types of evidence used to design and update HBPs, this report identifies actionable lessons for designing HBPs that advance health systems objectives in a sustainable way. More: www.hfgproject.org and https://www.hfgproject.org/using-evidence-health-benefit-plans/
Do Better Laws and Regulations Promote Universal Health Coverage? A Review of...HFG Project
The importance of policies, laws, and regulations (referred to collectively below as “policy instances”) as instruments to support progress towards Universal Health Coverage (UHC) in low- and middle-income countries cannot be understated. However, there has been insufficient focus in the literature on the role of these instruments, leading to a lack of evidence as to what constitutes a supportive legal environment that can consistently provide a strong basis for UHC reform processes. In this review, we explore how policies implemented in different country contexts have had an impact on their achievement of UHC goals.
In order to better differentiate the effect of various policy instances on the achievement of UHC goals, we developed a typology for policy instances and then ascribed the different aspects of governance to the instances identified in the literature, based on how they were designed and implemented. Finally, we considered the success of each policy instance identified, in terms of achieving intended UHC-related outcomes.
Governments may have political and process constraints on the number of policy instances they can design and implement in a period leading up to and during health sector reform. In terms of which health system component to focus such change on, we have more evidence for policy instances focused on health financing, given that designing effective financing mechanisms can shape the entire health
sector. Following this, policy instances that address human resources for health and supply chain management should be prioritized as they appear to have key strengthening effects on the provision of healthcare by increasing efficiency, equity, and quality.
This review of the evidence to date of governments’ policy-making experience highlights the importance of effective policy design and implementation with a clear orientation towards better governance, and in particular increased responsiveness and accountability.
Universal Health Coverage in Haryana: Setting Priorities for Health and Healt...HFG Project
In India, the reach of the public health system is limited; many people avoid seeking formal care because of its high cost or cultural barriers. As a result, they delay seeking care until they are seriously ill, which means higher costs when they seek care, high morbidity, and sometimes mortality that would have been preventable had care been sought earlier in the course of illness. This report provides Haryana a five-year road map for moving toward universal health coverage (UHC). It identifies key inputs that the state will need to effectively expand coverage of primary and secondary care by 2019/20 and estimates the cost of these inputs, in addition to other government-mandated increases.
South Africa HIV and TB Expenditure Review 2014/15 - 2016/17. Executive SummaryHFG Project
The South African Government (SAG) and its development partners have mounted a formidable response to the world’s largest HIV epidemic and a persistent burden of tuberculosis (TB), the country’s leading killer. Nearly 4 million South Africans initiated antiretroviral therapy (ART) by the end of financial year 2016/17, helping to curtail new infections and reduce the number of annual HIV-related deaths. Mortality from TB has also declined thanks, in part, to improved treatment success.
Despite progress, challenges remain. Roughly 3 million people living with HIV (PLHIV) lack treatment, and each year more than a quarter million are newly infected. Moreover, nearly a half million South Africans contract TB every year, with an increasing share affected by drug-resistant strains.
To effectively plan and steward the health system, the SAG routinely monitors programmatic and financial performance of the response to HIV and TB, including by tracking expenditure. Analysis of spending, including trends in sources, levels, geographic and programmatic distribution and cost drivers can help policymakers to assess whether resources are reaching priority populations, interventions, and hotspot geographies; to identify potential opportunities to improve allocative and technical efficiency; and to stimulate more productive dialogue at multiple levels of the system.
This review of HIV and TB expenditure in South Africa is an input to policy, planning and management processes within and amongst spheres of government and between government and development partners. The data have been especially useful to national and provincial programme managers as they perform their oversight functions, leading to improved spending of available resources. With 52 annexes, it also serves as an authoritative reference document detailing levels and trends in HIV and TB spending by the three main funders of the disease responses: the SAG, the United States Government (USG), primarily via the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), and the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria (the Global Fund). The findings have informed South Africa’s report to the UNAIDS Global AIDS Monitor and the country’s forthcoming funding request to the Global Fund.
Trends in health financing and the private health sector in the middle east a...HFG Project
In the past several decades, countries in the Middle East and North Africa have made significant improvements in developing their health systems and improving the health status of their populations. However, the region continues to face substantial and diverse political, macroeconomic,social, and health challenges. In 2010–2011, the mass uprisings over high unemployment, poverty, and political repression known as the Arab Spring began in several countries. These events led to a wave of social and political upheaval that had enduring repercussions throughout the region. Iraq, Libya, Syria, and Yemen remain embroiled in prolonged violent conflicts. Other countries are more stable but undergoing significant changes and reforms.
To understand current health financing policies and mechanisms, as well as the current role of the private sector in the health systems of the Middle East, the USAID Middle East Regional Bureau commissioned the Sustaining Health Outcomes through the Private Sector (SHOPS) Plus and Health Finance and Governance (HFG) projects to conduct a review of health financing and the private health sector in the 11 low-and middle-income countries in the region, focusing on the years 2008 to 2017.1 The countries included in this analysis are Algeria, Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, Lebanon, Libya, Morocco, Syria, Tunisia, the West Bank and Gaza, and Yemen. This review aims to highlight regional trends and identify gaps in information.
Health financing within the overall health systemHFG Project
Presented during Day One of the 2016 Nigeria Health Care Financing Training Workshop. Presented by Prof. Tanimola Akande and Dr. Francis Ukwuije. More: https://www.hfgproject.org/hcf-training-nigeria
The health of a people to a very large extent determines their productivity and wealth. The 2010
Population and Housing Census indicates that a significant proportion of the Bunkpurugu-Yunyoo District in
Ghana (over 75%) are living below the poverty line of GH¢228.00 per annum (approximately US $120 per
annum). It then implies that approximately the same proportion or even a little above that might not be able to
access health care under the ‘cash and carry’ system. Inability to access health care will lead to poor health
status of the residents and thus lower their productivity.
HFG Rapid Assessment of TB Payment and PFM Systems in the Philippines: Lesson...HFG Project
In the Philippines, there are roughly 290,000 new TB cases per year (WHO, 2016). Meanwhile, donor funding for TB has declined, health care costs are rising, and out-of-pocket spending accounts for roughly two-thirds of national TB expenditures. The Philippines needs to identify mechanisms to improve the efficiency of TB spending (i.e., mechanisms for spending money wisely). In the short term, this may mean finding ways to improve outputs—such as access, use of services, and quality—for a given level of spending on TB. In the long term, the Philippines and countries facing similar challenges may be interested in finding ways to achieve better outputs with fewer resources.
The Philippines was the subject of one of several country case studies linking strategic TB purchasing with improved efficiency and better outcomes. In April 2016, HFG conducted a brief but in-depth assessment of health purchasing/provider payment and PFM systems in the Philippines, to identify rigidities and barriers.
Universal health coverage (UHC)—ensuring that everyone has access to quality, affordable health services when needed—can be a vehicle for improved equity, health, financial well-being, and economic development. In its 2013 report, Global Health 2035, the Commission on Investing in Health (CIH) made the case that progressive (“pro-poor”) pathways towards UHC, which target the poor from the outset, are the most efficient way to achieve both improved health outcomes and increased financial protection (FP). Countries worldwide are now embarking on health system changes to move closer to achieving UHC, often with a clear pro-poor intent. While they can draw on guidance related to the technical aspects of UHC (the “what” of UHC), such as on service package design, there is less information on the “how” of UHC—that is, on how to maximize the chances of successful implementation.
Motivated by a shared interest in helping to close this information gap, a diverse international group of 21 practitioners and academics, including ministry of health officials and representatives of global health agencies and foundations, convened at The Rockefeller Foundation’s Bellagio Center for a three-day workshop from July 7–9, 2015. The participants shared their experiences of implementing UHC and discussed the limited evidence on how to implement UHC, focusing on a set of seven key “how” questions from across five domains of UHC.
Public Financial Management, Health Governance, and Health SystemsHFG Project
While the importance of governance in a health system is well recognized, there is an overall lack of evidence and understanding of the dynamics of how improved governance can influence health system performance and health outcomes. There is still considerable debate on which governance interventions are appropriate for different contexts. This lack of evidence can result in avoidance of health governance efforts or an over-reliance on a limited set of governance interventions. As development partners and governments are increasing their emphasis on improving accountability and transparency of health systems and strengthening country policies and institutions to move towards universal health coverage (UHC), the need of this evidence is ever rising.
To address this evidence gap, the USAID’s Office of Health Systems (USAID/GH/OHS), the World Health Organization (WHO), and the Health Finance and Governance (HFG) Project launched an initiative in September 2016 to ‘Marshall the Evidence’ on how governance contributes to health system performance and improves health outcomes.
The overall objective of the initiative was to increase awareness and understanding of the evidence of what works and why in how governance contributes to health system performance, and how the field of health governance is evolving at the country level. This report provides a synthesis of the findings across the four themes. This report presents the findings of the Public Financial Management.
Guide for the Monitoring and Evaluation of the Transition of Health ProgramsHFG Project
This guide looks at three different transition experiences (funding, technical assistance, and services) to demonstrate variations in the type of transition undertaken, and the corresponding need for M&E. The authors draw upon experience of monitoring and evaluating transition to clarify key elements and dimensions of transition and how they relate to the longer-term goal of program sustainability and to present possible indicators, relevant to different health programs and transition arrangements that can help track transition and offer suggestions on how to select appropriate indicators. This document provides a conceptual framework to guide thinking around the M&E of transitions and will be amended as experience grows.
Linkages Between the Essential Health Services Package and Government-Sponsor...HFG Project
Priority setting is a key function of health systems that seek to achieve universal health coverage. The Essential Health Services Package (EHSP) explicitly prioritizes certain services; government-sponsored health benefit plans implicitly prioritize others. To gain insights into the purpose, policy objectives, and governance of the EPHS and dominant health benefit plans in Ethiopia, we conducted a case study in 2016. Methods included a desk review of relevant documents and qualitative analysis of 15 key informant interviews of leading health finance experts in Addis Ababa. All data were coded and analyzed using a thematic inductive framework.
Using Evidence to Design Health Benefit Plans for Stronger Health Systems: Le...HFG Project
Low- and middle-income country governments face competing health priorities as they try to increase their populations’ access to affordable healthcare with limited resources. Faced with difficult choices, how can governments align their spending with health system objectives? One common policy instrument governments are using is the health benefit plan (HBP), defined here as a pre-determined, publicly managed list of guaranteed health services. Based on country experiences, the authors of this report argue that using evidence improves the potential for HBPs to achieve and balance countries’ objectives for equity, efficiency, financial protection, and sustainability in the health sector.
Governments using—or considering—HBPs as part of their pathway to UHC are faced with complex questions as they prepare to design new HBPs or update existing ones to address technological, epidemiological, economic, or other changes. This report is intended to serve as a resource for these governments. Through a review of 25 countries examining the types of evidence used to design and update HBPs, this report identifies actionable lessons for designing HBPs that advance health systems objectives in a sustainable way. More: www.hfgproject.org and https://www.hfgproject.org/using-evidence-health-benefit-plans/
Do Better Laws and Regulations Promote Universal Health Coverage? A Review of...HFG Project
The importance of policies, laws, and regulations (referred to collectively below as “policy instances”) as instruments to support progress towards Universal Health Coverage (UHC) in low- and middle-income countries cannot be understated. However, there has been insufficient focus in the literature on the role of these instruments, leading to a lack of evidence as to what constitutes a supportive legal environment that can consistently provide a strong basis for UHC reform processes. In this review, we explore how policies implemented in different country contexts have had an impact on their achievement of UHC goals.
In order to better differentiate the effect of various policy instances on the achievement of UHC goals, we developed a typology for policy instances and then ascribed the different aspects of governance to the instances identified in the literature, based on how they were designed and implemented. Finally, we considered the success of each policy instance identified, in terms of achieving intended UHC-related outcomes.
Governments may have political and process constraints on the number of policy instances they can design and implement in a period leading up to and during health sector reform. In terms of which health system component to focus such change on, we have more evidence for policy instances focused on health financing, given that designing effective financing mechanisms can shape the entire health
sector. Following this, policy instances that address human resources for health and supply chain management should be prioritized as they appear to have key strengthening effects on the provision of healthcare by increasing efficiency, equity, and quality.
This review of the evidence to date of governments’ policy-making experience highlights the importance of effective policy design and implementation with a clear orientation towards better governance, and in particular increased responsiveness and accountability.
Universal Health Coverage in Haryana: Setting Priorities for Health and Healt...HFG Project
In India, the reach of the public health system is limited; many people avoid seeking formal care because of its high cost or cultural barriers. As a result, they delay seeking care until they are seriously ill, which means higher costs when they seek care, high morbidity, and sometimes mortality that would have been preventable had care been sought earlier in the course of illness. This report provides Haryana a five-year road map for moving toward universal health coverage (UHC). It identifies key inputs that the state will need to effectively expand coverage of primary and secondary care by 2019/20 and estimates the cost of these inputs, in addition to other government-mandated increases.
South Africa HIV and TB Expenditure Review 2014/15 - 2016/17. Executive SummaryHFG Project
The South African Government (SAG) and its development partners have mounted a formidable response to the world’s largest HIV epidemic and a persistent burden of tuberculosis (TB), the country’s leading killer. Nearly 4 million South Africans initiated antiretroviral therapy (ART) by the end of financial year 2016/17, helping to curtail new infections and reduce the number of annual HIV-related deaths. Mortality from TB has also declined thanks, in part, to improved treatment success.
Despite progress, challenges remain. Roughly 3 million people living with HIV (PLHIV) lack treatment, and each year more than a quarter million are newly infected. Moreover, nearly a half million South Africans contract TB every year, with an increasing share affected by drug-resistant strains.
To effectively plan and steward the health system, the SAG routinely monitors programmatic and financial performance of the response to HIV and TB, including by tracking expenditure. Analysis of spending, including trends in sources, levels, geographic and programmatic distribution and cost drivers can help policymakers to assess whether resources are reaching priority populations, interventions, and hotspot geographies; to identify potential opportunities to improve allocative and technical efficiency; and to stimulate more productive dialogue at multiple levels of the system.
This review of HIV and TB expenditure in South Africa is an input to policy, planning and management processes within and amongst spheres of government and between government and development partners. The data have been especially useful to national and provincial programme managers as they perform their oversight functions, leading to improved spending of available resources. With 52 annexes, it also serves as an authoritative reference document detailing levels and trends in HIV and TB spending by the three main funders of the disease responses: the SAG, the United States Government (USG), primarily via the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), and the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria (the Global Fund). The findings have informed South Africa’s report to the UNAIDS Global AIDS Monitor and the country’s forthcoming funding request to the Global Fund.
Trends in health financing and the private health sector in the middle east a...HFG Project
In the past several decades, countries in the Middle East and North Africa have made significant improvements in developing their health systems and improving the health status of their populations. However, the region continues to face substantial and diverse political, macroeconomic,social, and health challenges. In 2010–2011, the mass uprisings over high unemployment, poverty, and political repression known as the Arab Spring began in several countries. These events led to a wave of social and political upheaval that had enduring repercussions throughout the region. Iraq, Libya, Syria, and Yemen remain embroiled in prolonged violent conflicts. Other countries are more stable but undergoing significant changes and reforms.
To understand current health financing policies and mechanisms, as well as the current role of the private sector in the health systems of the Middle East, the USAID Middle East Regional Bureau commissioned the Sustaining Health Outcomes through the Private Sector (SHOPS) Plus and Health Finance and Governance (HFG) projects to conduct a review of health financing and the private health sector in the 11 low-and middle-income countries in the region, focusing on the years 2008 to 2017.1 The countries included in this analysis are Algeria, Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, Lebanon, Libya, Morocco, Syria, Tunisia, the West Bank and Gaza, and Yemen. This review aims to highlight regional trends and identify gaps in information.
Health financing within the overall health systemHFG Project
Presented during Day One of the 2016 Nigeria Health Care Financing Training Workshop. Presented by Prof. Tanimola Akande and Dr. Francis Ukwuije. More: https://www.hfgproject.org/hcf-training-nigeria
The health of a people to a very large extent determines their productivity and wealth. The 2010
Population and Housing Census indicates that a significant proportion of the Bunkpurugu-Yunyoo District in
Ghana (over 75%) are living below the poverty line of GH¢228.00 per annum (approximately US $120 per
annum). It then implies that approximately the same proportion or even a little above that might not be able to
access health care under the ‘cash and carry’ system. Inability to access health care will lead to poor health
status of the residents and thus lower their productivity.
HFG Rapid Assessment of TB Payment and PFM Systems in the Philippines: Lesson...HFG Project
In the Philippines, there are roughly 290,000 new TB cases per year (WHO, 2016). Meanwhile, donor funding for TB has declined, health care costs are rising, and out-of-pocket spending accounts for roughly two-thirds of national TB expenditures. The Philippines needs to identify mechanisms to improve the efficiency of TB spending (i.e., mechanisms for spending money wisely). In the short term, this may mean finding ways to improve outputs—such as access, use of services, and quality—for a given level of spending on TB. In the long term, the Philippines and countries facing similar challenges may be interested in finding ways to achieve better outputs with fewer resources.
The Philippines was the subject of one of several country case studies linking strategic TB purchasing with improved efficiency and better outcomes. In April 2016, HFG conducted a brief but in-depth assessment of health purchasing/provider payment and PFM systems in the Philippines, to identify rigidities and barriers.
Universal health coverage (UHC)—ensuring that everyone has access to quality, affordable health services when needed—can be a vehicle for improved equity, health, financial well-being, and economic development. In its 2013 report, Global Health 2035, the Commission on Investing in Health (CIH) made the case that progressive (“pro-poor”) pathways towards UHC, which target the poor from the outset, are the most efficient way to achieve both improved health outcomes and increased financial protection (FP). Countries worldwide are now embarking on health system changes to move closer to achieving UHC, often with a clear pro-poor intent. While they can draw on guidance related to the technical aspects of UHC (the “what” of UHC), such as on service package design, there is less information on the “how” of UHC—that is, on how to maximize the chances of successful implementation.
Motivated by a shared interest in helping to close this information gap, a diverse international group of 21 practitioners and academics, including ministry of health officials and representatives of global health agencies and foundations, convened at The Rockefeller Foundation’s Bellagio Center for a three-day workshop from July 7–9, 2015. The participants shared their experiences of implementing UHC and discussed the limited evidence on how to implement UHC, focusing on a set of seven key “how” questions from across five domains of UHC.
Engaging Civil Society in Health Finance and Governance: A Guide for Practiti...HFG Project
Governments and international donor organizations increasingly acknowledge the role of civil society organizations (CSOs) in strengthening health systems. By facilitating dialogue between government and citizens on issues of health sector priorities, performance, and accountability, CSOs can help to improve health service delivery and contribute to evidence-based policy. Often, however, CSOs lack the skills and tools needed to engage other stakeholders in issues of health finance and governance.
HFG’s guide provides governments and donors practical advice on engaging civil society in health finance and governance in order to meet health sector objectives and to improve health outcomes. Our guide describes the potential and limitations of civil society engagement entry points and presents an array of tools that may be used to do so.
Focusing specifically on the health sector, the HFG Guide offers practitioners a range of tools from which to choose based on the environment they work in and the objectives they seek to achieve. The guide emphasizes approaches that foster collaboration between public health officials and civil society that can improve access to and the quality of health services, ultimately contributing to improved health outcomes. This guide also seeks to provide practical mechanisms for how civil society engagement may be achieved, at the national, subnational, and community levels.
Integrating the HIV Response at the Systems LevelHFG Project
The global response to combat the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) epidemic scaled up considerably in the early 2000s with the establishment of key institutions, notably the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria (Global Fund) and the United States President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) (AIDS.gov 2018). In response to high global rates of AIDS-related morbidity and mortality, the internationally supported rapid scale-up of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) prevention, testing, treatment, and drug development is widely credited with curtailing a global epidemic, thereby limiting the human and financial costs of the virus (Bekker et al. 2018). Still the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) estimates that 1.8 million people were infected with HIV in 2017, and there are nearly 37 million people living with HIV (PLWHIV) worldwide (UNAIDS 2018a). In many countries, financing and governance of HIV services is transitioning from international donors to national governments.
This funding transition has major implications for the governance, management, and implementation of the HIV response. Governments undergoing funding transitions for the HIV response are integrating aspects of the response into systems and processes for governing, managing, financing, and delivering other essential
health services. But this phenomenon has not been systematically studied, and documentation on how governments achieve this is limited. Understanding how some governments are navigating an HIV funding transition may help other countries and the global health community to better design and plan future or ongoing efforts to transition national HIV responses to domestic resources for health. USAID’s HFG project is helping to fill this gap. In particular, this study helps build an evidence base by exploring whether and how four countries in the process of transitioning to greater domestic financing of their HIV response are integrating HIV programming with local systems and processes for other essential health services.
This study applies the concept of system integration to examine the alignment of rules, policies, and support systems to address HIV and other essential health services in four low and middle-income countries (LMICs). Specifically, the study explores the current extent of integration, the decisions faced by policymakers, and potential barriers/facilitators to integration in four countries. The analysis allows HFG to share lessons learned by each of these countries attempting to optimize rules, policy, and support systems for HIV and other essential health services.
A Rapid Assessment of Key Areas of the NHSSP for Timor-Leste: Strengths, Chal...HFG Project
Since gaining its independence in 2002, Timor-Leste has made significant strides in rebuilding its political system, physical infrastructure, civil service structure, and health care system. The country has done this with substantial financial and technical donor support. In the health sector, Timor-Leste has created a sound 20-year national health plan, the National Health Sector Strategic Plan (NHSSP) 2011-2030. The NHSSP identifies four health system priorities: 1) Provision of Health Services, 2) Investment in Human Capital, 3) Infrastructure Investment, and 4) Health Management and Administration.
Despite these positive developments, Timor-Leste faces significant challenges: many health indicators are poor – Timor-Leste’s stunting rate is the second highest in the world, and maternal mortality remains staggeringly high across the socio-economic spectrum. It will be important to break the cycle of close birth spacing, high fertility rates, chronic malnutrition, poor human capacity, and poor education. In addition, Timor-Leste has to take the health development agenda increasingly into its own hands, against the backdrop of dwindling donor resources and a contracting oil-dependent economy, which is responsible for up to 80 percent of Timor-Leste’s gross domestic product.
To help inform the future scope of USAID health sector support in Timor-Leste, the agency tasked the Health Finance and Governance (HFG) project with conducting a rapid assessment of Timor-Leste’s progress against the key objectives of the NHSSP, and to identify potential strategic high-impact areas for agency support.
Barbados 2012-13 Health Accounts ReportHFG Project
This report presents the findings and policy implications of Barbados’ first Health Accounts estimation, conducted for the year April 2012 to March 2013. It captures spending from all sources: the government, non-governmental organizations, external donors, private employers, private insurance companies and households. The analysis presented breaks down spending to the standard classifications, as defined by the System of Health Accounts 2011 framework, namely sources of financing, financing schemes, type of provider, type of activity and disease/health condition.
Financing of Universal Health Coverage and Family Planning: A Multi-Regional ...HFG Project
Recognizing that a healthy population promotes economic development, resilience, and strength, many governments have started pursuing a universal health coverage (UHC) agenda. The international community, national governments, private organizations, and individuals are increasingly recognizing that universal access to family planning is worthy of increased financial investment. Improved access to family planning is also important for a country’s economic development, and it helps countries improve health outcomes for mothers, newborns, and children.
To reach UHC, governments are looking to pursue more and better spending for health care and to promote financial protection for households. While there is no single or perfect model for financing health care, the health policy community can draw on international experience to identify best practices.
This report presents observed trends and lessons learned from a health financing landscape study of fifteen countries. We conducted detailed analyses of eight countries in West Africa: Benin, Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Guinea, Mali, Niger, Senegal, and Togo (“core countries”). We also reviewed seven countries at various stages of achieving UHC to draw lessons learned and inform potential strategies: Ethiopia, Ghana, Indonesia, Kenya, Malaysia, Nigeria, and South Africa (“reference countries”).
Universal Health Coverage: Frequently Asked QuestionsHFG Project
This brief answers several “frequently asked questions” (FAQ) on universal health coverage (UHC):
What is Universal Health Coverage (UHC)?
How does UHC align with USAID’s priorities?
How does UHC relate to broader goals for development, including the Sustainable Development Goals?
How is UHC measured?
What progress has been made towards UHC?
How does USAID support countries’ UHC efforts?
The FAQ accompanies Universal Health Coverage: An Annotated Bibliography, which presents resources that provide an overview of UHC and also delve into specific topics within UHC, such as measurement, health financing, and benefit plans. The bibliography also includes links to relevant websites that can provide additional resources.
Impact of Health Systems Strengthening on HealthHFG Project
Leaders in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) require timely and compelling evidence about how to strengthen their health systems to improve the health and well-being of their citizens. Yet, evidence on how to strengthen health system performance to achieve sustainable health improvements at scale, particularly toward Ending Preventable Child and Maternal Deaths (EPCMD), fostering an AIDS-Free Generation (AFG), and Protecting Communities against Infectious Diseases (PCID) is limited. The evidence that does exist is scattered, insufficiently analyzed, and not widely disseminated. Without evidence, decision-makers lack a sound basis for investing scarce health funds in health systems strengthening (HSS) in an environment of competing investment options.
USAID is committed to advancing the evidence base on HSS and this commissioned report clearly demonstrates that HSS can improve health in LMICs.
This report, based on a review of systematic reviews of the effects on health of HSS, presents a significant body of evidence linking HSS interventions to measureable impact on health for vulnerable people in LMICs. Making decisions on who delivers health services and where and how these services are organized is important to achieve priority health goals such as EPCMD, AFG, and PCID. The findings of this report document the value of investing in HSS.
Introduction to Health Insurance Policy Options in Botswana: Improving Effici...HFG Project
The purpose of this report is to explore how insurance reforms could improve the efficiency and sustainability of the Botswana health system, and to offer specific policy recommendations to guide the development of a national health insurance reform proposal. The report builds on the Health Finance and Governance (HFG) Project’s support to the Ministry of Health (MOH) and the Health Financing Technical Working Group (HFTWG), and is one output of HFG and HFTWG’s joint development of a health financing strategy. Further, the report will inform HFG’s future technical assistance, which includes more quantitative analysis related to financing an insurance system and a fuller exploration of the feasibility of insurance reform.
Health Promotion and Population Health: an Health Promotion Clearinghouse Re...Rafa Cofiño
Within the “Health Promotion and Population Health” resource list, you will find a variety of
information from provincial, national and international sources on the topic population health. This
resource list is organized into five sections: Overview, Documents, Organizational Links, Other Tools
and Resources, and Funding Opportunities.
Governing Quality in Health Care on the Path to Universal Health Coverage: A ...HFG Project
As countries work to promote and achieve Universal Health Coverage (UHC), maintaining and improving quality in health care is emerging as a priority. While research has been conducted on service delivery and financing schemes for UHC, little consolidated knowledge or guidance is available on institutional arrangements and their impact on quality of care in the context of UHC.
Responding to this need, the HFG project conducted a literature review to attempt to document global experience in institutional roles and relationships governing quality of care in the health sector, and to identify successful features or factors when structuring institutional roles, responsibilities, and relationships.
Mobile Money for Health Case Study CompendiumHFG Project
Resource Type: Case Studies
Authors: Health Finance and Governance (HFG)
Published: 10/31/2015
Resource Description:Globally, 2.5 billion people are “unbanked,” lacking access to formal financial services. As a result, roughly one third of the world’s population is forced to rely on cash transactions or informal financial systems, which can often be unsafe, inconvenient, and expensive. Among the unbanked, however, a billion have access to a mobile phone, and mobile-based financial services are quickly closing the financial access gap.
Recognizing the potential of mobile-based financial services, the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) is committed to accelerating the adoption and uptake of mobile money based on its potential to increase financial inclusion, root out corruption, and provide economic benefits to communities. To support these goals, the USAID Health Finance and Governance (HFG) Project seeks to promote the use of mobile money in health programs, both as catalyst for uptake in communities and to strengthen health systems.
Despite the recent proliferation of mobile phone usage and uptake of mobile money in developing markets, use in the health sector remains limited and, often, has not been brought to scale. This compendium seeks to expand the knowledge base on mobile money in the health sector by drawing out trends from existing programs and examining what’s worked, what hasn’t, and why, while documenting recommendations and insights from past and current practitioners for future adaptation.
The 14 mobile money programs profiled in this compendium span a range of countries, health topics, and application types, from health insurance schemes promoting universal health coverage, to lottery voucher payments encouraging parents to vaccinate their children against polio and other diseases.
Public Financial Management, Health Governance, and Health SystemsHFG Project
While the importance of governance in a health system is well recognized, there is an overall lack of evidence and understanding of the dynamics of how improved governance can influence health system performance and health outcomes. There is still considerable debate on which governance interventions are appropriate for different contexts. This lack of evidence can result in avoidance of health governance efforts or an over-reliance on a limited set of governance interventions. As development partners and governments are increasing their emphasis on improving accountability and transparency of health systems and strengthening country policies and institutions to move towards universal health coverage (UHC), the need of this evidence is ever rising.
To address this evidence gap, the USAID’s Office of Health Systems (USAID/GH/OHS), the World Health Organization (WHO), and the Health Finance and Governance (HFG) Project launched an initiative in September 2016 to ‘Marshall the Evidence’ on how governance contributes to health system performance and improves health outcomes.
The overall objective of the initiative was to increase awareness and understanding of the evidence of what works and why in how governance contributes to health system performance, and how the field of health governance is evolving at the country level. This report provides a synthesis of the findings across the four themes. This report presents the findings of the Public Financial Management.
How many patients does case series should have In comparison to case reports.pdfpubrica101
Pubrica’s team of researchers and writers create scientific and medical research articles, which may be important resources for authors and practitioners. Pubrica medical writers assist you in creating and revising the introduction by alerting the reader to gaps in the chosen study subject. Our professionals understand the order in which the hypothesis topic is followed by the broad subject, the issue, and the backdrop.
https://pubrica.com/academy/case-study-or-series/how-many-patients-does-case-series-should-have-in-comparison-to-case-reports/
The Importance of Community Nursing Care.pdfAD Healthcare
NDIS and Community 24/7 Nursing Care is a specific type of support that may be provided under the NDIS for individuals with complex medical needs who require ongoing nursing care in a community setting, such as their home or a supported accommodation facility.
Antibiotic Stewardship by Anushri Srivastava.pptxAnushriSrivastav
Stewardship is the act of taking good care of something.
Antimicrobial stewardship is a coordinated program that promotes the appropriate use of antimicrobials (including antibiotics), improves patient outcomes, reduces microbial resistance, and decreases the spread of infections caused by multidrug-resistant organisms.
WHO launched the Global Antimicrobial Resistance and Use Surveillance System (GLASS) in 2015 to fill knowledge gaps and inform strategies at all levels.
ACCORDING TO apic.org,
Antimicrobial stewardship is a coordinated program that promotes the appropriate use of antimicrobials (including antibiotics), improves patient outcomes, reduces microbial resistance, and decreases the spread of infections caused by multidrug-resistant organisms.
ACCORDING TO pewtrusts.org,
Antibiotic stewardship refers to efforts in doctors’ offices, hospitals, long term care facilities, and other health care settings to ensure that antibiotics are used only when necessary and appropriate
According to WHO,
Antimicrobial stewardship is a systematic approach to educate and support health care professionals to follow evidence-based guidelines for prescribing and administering antimicrobials
In 1996, John McGowan and Dale Gerding first applied the term antimicrobial stewardship, where they suggested a causal association between antimicrobial agent use and resistance. They also focused on the urgency of large-scale controlled trials of antimicrobial-use regulation employing sophisticated epidemiologic methods, molecular typing, and precise resistance mechanism analysis.
Antimicrobial Stewardship(AMS) refers to the optimal selection, dosing, and duration of antimicrobial treatment resulting in the best clinical outcome with minimal side effects to the patients and minimal impact on subsequent resistance.
According to the 2019 report, in the US, more than 2.8 million antibiotic-resistant infections occur each year, and more than 35000 people die. In addition to this, it also mentioned that 223,900 cases of Clostridoides difficile occurred in 2017, of which 12800 people died. The report did not include viruses or parasites
VISION
Being proactive
Supporting optimal animal and human health
Exploring ways to reduce overall use of antimicrobials
Using the drugs that prevent and treat disease by killing microscopic organisms in a responsible way
GOAL
to prevent the generation and spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Doing so will preserve the effectiveness of these drugs in animals and humans for years to come.
being to preserve human and animal health and the effectiveness of antimicrobial medications.
to implement a multidisciplinary approach in assembling a stewardship team to include an infectious disease physician, a clinical pharmacist with infectious diseases training, infection preventionist, and a close collaboration with the staff in the clinical microbiology laboratory
to prevent antimicrobial overuse, misuse and abuse.
to minimize the developme
Deep Leg Vein Thrombosis (DVT): Meaning, Causes, Symptoms, Treatment, and Mor...The Lifesciences Magazine
Deep Leg Vein Thrombosis occurs when a blood clot forms in one or more of the deep veins in the legs. These clots can impede blood flow, leading to severe complications.
Telehealth Psychology Building Trust with Clients.pptxThe Harvest Clinic
Telehealth psychology is a digital approach that offers psychological services and mental health care to clients remotely, using technologies like video conferencing, phone calls, text messaging, and mobile apps for communication.
Defecation
Normal defecation begins with movement in the left colon, moving stool toward the anus. When stool reaches the rectum, the distention causes relaxation of the internal sphincter and an awareness of the need to defecate. At the time of defecation, the external sphincter relaxes, and abdominal muscles contract, increasing intrarectal pressure and forcing the stool out
The Valsalva maneuver exerts pressure to expel faeces through a voluntary contraction of the abdominal muscles while maintaining forced expiration against a closed airway. Patients with cardiovascular disease, glaucoma, increased intracranial pressure, or a new surgical wound are at greater risk for cardiac dysrhythmias and elevated blood pressure with the Valsalva maneuver and need to avoid straining to pass the stool.
Normal defecation is painless, resulting in passage of soft, formed stool
CONSTIPATION
Constipation is a symptom, not a disease. Improper diet, reduced fluid intake, lack of exercise, and certain medications can cause constipation. For example, patients receiving opiates for pain after surgery often require a stool softener or laxative to prevent constipation. The signs of constipation include infrequent bowel movements (less than every 3 days), difficulty passing stools, excessive straining, inability to defecate at will, and hard feaces
IMPACTION
Fecal impaction results from unrelieved constipation. It is a collection of hardened feces wedged in the rectum that a person cannot expel. In cases of severe impaction the mass extends up into the sigmoid colon.
DIARRHEA
Diarrhea is an increase in the number of stools and the passage of liquid, unformed feces. It is associated with disorders affecting digestion, absorption, and secretion in the GI tract. Intestinal contents pass through the small and large intestine too quickly to allow for the usual absorption of fluid and nutrients. Irritation within the colon results in increased mucus secretion. As a result, feces become watery, and the patient is unable to control the urge to defecate. Normally an anal bag is safe and effective in long-term treatment of patients with fecal incontinence at home, in hospice, or in the hospital. Fecal incontinence is expensive and a potentially dangerous condition in terms of contamination and risk of skin ulceration
HEMORRHOIDS
Hemorrhoids are dilated, engorged veins in the lining of the rectum. They are either external or internal.
FLATULENCE
As gas accumulates in the lumen of the intestines, the bowel wall stretches and distends (flatulence). It is a common cause of abdominal fullness, pain, and cramping. Normally intestinal gas escapes through the mouth (belching) or the anus (passing of flatus)
FECAL INCONTINENCE
Fecal incontinence is the inability to control passage of feces and gas from the anus. Incontinence harms a patient’s body image
PREPARATION AND GIVING OF LAXATIVESACCORDING TO POTTER AND PERRY,
An enema is the instillation of a solution into the rectum and sig
R3 Stem Cells and Kidney Repair A New Horizon in Nephrology.pptxR3 Stem Cell
R3 Stem Cells and Kidney Repair: A New Horizon in Nephrology" explores groundbreaking advancements in the use of R3 stem cells for kidney disease treatment. This insightful piece delves into the potential of these cells to regenerate damaged kidney tissue, offering new hope for patients and reshaping the future of nephrology.
CRISPR-Cas9, a revolutionary gene-editing tool, holds immense potential to reshape medicine, agriculture, and our understanding of life. But like any powerful tool, it comes with ethical considerations.
Unveiling CRISPR: This naturally occurring bacterial defense system (crRNA & Cas9 protein) fights viruses. Scientists repurposed it for precise gene editing (correction, deletion, insertion) by targeting specific DNA sequences.
The Promise: CRISPR offers exciting possibilities:
Gene Therapy: Correcting genetic diseases like cystic fibrosis.
Agriculture: Engineering crops resistant to pests and harsh environments.
Research: Studying gene function to unlock new knowledge.
The Peril: Ethical concerns demand attention:
Off-target Effects: Unintended DNA edits can have unforeseen consequences.
Eugenics: Misusing CRISPR for designer babies raises social and ethical questions.
Equity: High costs could limit access to this potentially life-saving technology.
The Path Forward: Responsible development is crucial:
International Collaboration: Clear guidelines are needed for research and human trials.
Public Education: Open discussions ensure informed decisions about CRISPR.
Prioritize Safety and Ethics: Safety and ethical principles must be paramount.
CRISPR offers a powerful tool for a better future, but responsible development and addressing ethical concerns are essential. By prioritizing safety, fostering open dialogue, and ensuring equitable access, we can harness CRISPR's power for the benefit of all. (2998 characters)
ICH Guidelines for Pharmacovigilance.pdfNEHA GUPTA
The "ICH Guidelines for Pharmacovigilance" PDF provides a comprehensive overview of the International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) guidelines related to pharmacovigilance. These guidelines aim to ensure that drugs are safe and effective for patients by monitoring and assessing adverse effects, ensuring proper reporting systems, and improving risk management practices. The document is essential for professionals in the pharmaceutical industry, regulatory authorities, and healthcare providers, offering detailed procedures and standards for pharmacovigilance activities to enhance drug safety and protect public health.
2. The Health Finance and Governance Project
USAID’s Health Finance and Governance (HFG) project helps to improve health in developing countries
by expanding people’s access to health care. Led by Abt Associates, the project team works with partner
countries to increase their domestic resources for health, manage those precious resources more effectively,
and make wise purchasing decisions. This five-year, $209 million global project aims to increase the use of
both primary and priority health services, including HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, malaria, and reproductive health
services. Designed to fundamentally strengthen health systems, HFG supports countries as they navigate the
economic transitions needed to achieve universal health care.
September 2015
Cooperative Agreement No: AID-OAA-A-12-00080
Submitted to: Scott Stewart, AOR
Jodi Charles, Senior Health Systems Advisor
Office of Health Systems
Bureau for Global Health
Recommended Citation: Meline, Megan, Lisa Tarantino, Jeremy Kanthor, and Sharon Nakhimovsky.
September 2015. The Health Finance and Governance Briefing Kit. Bethesda, MD: Health Finance & Governance
Project, Abt Associates Inc.
3. The Health Finance
and Governance
Briefing Kit
September 2015
This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for
International Development (USAID). It was prepared by Megan Meline,
Lisa Tarantino, Jeremy Kanthor, and Sharon Nakhimovsky for the
Health Finance and Governance (HFG) Project.
DISCLAIMER: The author’s views expressed in this publication do not
necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government.
4. ii ▬ The Health Finance and Governance Briefing Kit
5. Table of Contents ▬ iii
Contents
Introduction: The Critical Links between Health, Finance, and Governance................................. 1
Tips for Using the Briefing Kit.............................................................................................................. 2
Stories from Around the World................................................................................................................ 5
Example 1: Health Engineering Officials Booked for Corruption................................................. 5
Example 2: Mixed News about Health Budget ................................................................................. 6
Example 3: Health Workers Strike at Government Hospitals........................................................ 7
Why Cover Health Finance and Governance Issues?.......................................................................... 9
Equity........................................................................................................................................................10
Sustainability............................................................................................................................................12
Accountability.........................................................................................................................................14
Performance............................................................................................................................................16
Essentials of Health Finance....................................................................................................................19
Health Budgeting ...................................................................................................................................20
Health Finance .......................................................................................................................................20
Health Insurance ...................................................................................................................................21
Resource Tracking .................................................................................................................................22
Universal Health Coverage (UHC)....................................................................................................23
Essentials of Health Governance............................................................................................................25
Health Governance Resources...........................................................................................................26
Sources for Reporting...............................................................................................................................29
National and Local Level Sources.......................................................................................................29
Regional and International Media Resources and Organizations ...............................................30
Glossary of Terms......................................................................................................................................33
Tips for Writing Compelling Stories......................................................................................................39
Topics,Tips, and Background Information.........................................................................................39
References...................................................................................................................................................47
Stories
Health Engineering Officials Booked for Corruption...................................................................... 5
Health Budget Increased, but…............................................................................................................ 6
Government Corruption “Cripples” Malawi’s Health Sector........................................................ 7
Eastern Cape Health Access ‘Made to look Like a Privilege’........................................................11
Over 5,000 Health Workers Employed.............................................................................................13
Bribe for Everything..............................................................................................................................15
Public Hospitals’ List of Shame Now Out........................................................................................17
6. iv ▬ The Health Finance and Governance Briefing Kit
“I thought of health finance stories as always being sensational — only about
money and certain politicians and big headlines. But now I understand that
they are much deeper than that, that they touch all Kenyans.”
Nairobi-based television journalist Jimmy Makhulo (September 2013)
7. Introduction: The Critical Link between Health, Finance, and Governance ▬ 1
TheWorld Health Organization (WHO) estimates
that 150 million people worldwide face“catastrophic
expenditure” because of high costs of health care.
In other words,they may have to forgo paying for
basic needs,such as food,housing,or education
to pay for medical treatment instead. These costs
include transportation,doctors’ fees,medicine,
hospitalization bills,and days lost from work.
Behind these sobering statistics lies a wealth of
news and feature stories waiting for the media
to investigate and share with national leaders and
policymakers as well as civil society groups who can
advocate for changes to health budgets and policies.
At the heart of these stories are important
questions about the financing of health care
and the quality of governance that ensures
responsive and effective management
of those resources and services.
But writing health finance and governance stories
can be challenging.Health finance is riddled with
complex language,technical economic terms,and
numbers – not necessarily a journalist’s comfort
zone. The right sources for these stories can be
difficult to identify and unwilling to talk.Data may
be difficult to locate or to understand. And while
corruption makes for splashy headlines,the broader
systemic challenges of health governance are not
widely understood — and yet they are important.
The Health Finance and Governance Briefing Kit
is designed to help journalists and their editors
uncover and tell these important health stories
that affect people all around the world.
INTRODUCTION: THE CRITICAL LINKS BETWEEN
HEALTH, FINANCE, AND GOVERNANCE
Getting access to affordable, quality health care is a universal story that touches virtually every family in
the world. At the same time, providing quality health services and access to trained health
professionals is a challenge for governments.
8. 2 ▬ The Health Finance and Governance Briefing Kit
Tips for Using the Briefing Kit
This briefing kit was created by journalists who
understand the realities of newsroom deadlines
and editors’ expectations. In collaboration with
Internews Kenya’s Health Media Project (HMP),
the Health Finance & Governance project (HFG)
piloted this kit with 15 health journalists during
a week-long workshop in Nairobi. Both projects
are funded by the United States Agency for
International Development (USAID).
The briefing kit is organized into the following
sections:
1. Examples of health finance and governance
stories;
2. Four important reasons for covering health
finance and governance issues;
3. Essential health finance resources and
background materials;
4. Essential health governance resources and
background materials;
5. Strategies for identifying and accessing key
sources for health finance and governance issues;
6. A glossary of essential key health finance and
health governance terms and concepts with
hyperlinks to primary sources;
7. Tips for writing about health finance and
governance topics, such as Universal Health
Coverage (UHC) or resource tracking; and
8. Links to media outlets for health finance and
governance news.
The briefing kit can be used in different ways.
Journalists may read it as a primer to better
understand the technical concepts and language
behind health finance and health governance.
It can also serve as a quick,go-to resource for
journalists—as well as other stakeholders—
interested in learning more about these issues.
Journalists also can take a deeper dive into a
specific issue,such as UHC or they can read
sample news and feature stories to get ideas about
how to cover a particular health issue in their
country. As Figure 1 shows,health financing and
governance underpin a strong health system,and
form the foundation for quality health services.
Figure 1: Strong Health Financing and Governance Improve Health
9. Introduction: The Critical Link between Health, Finance, and Governance ▬ 3
By highlighting the important link between health outcomes, health finance, and health
governance, the media can play a key role in expanding access to life-saving health care for
millions of people all over the world.
At the Kenya workshop, Dr. Regina Ombam, Head of Strategy for Kenya’s National AIDS
Control Council, emphasized the media’s unique role in promoting health governance. “The
best way we can govern our health is when we communicate about it. If I have information and
don’t give it out in the best way possible, then that is it what will be consumed. If I give it in an
effective, understandable manner, then whoever reports on it will report on it the same way.”
As the journalists found, being better informed about health finance and health governance
issues made it easier to identify more potential health stories, all related to health finance
and governance. During the workshop, the journalists learned that government stakeholders
became increasingly engaged when they realized the valuable role media could play in
explaining important policies, such as decentralization. It also facilitated interacting with their
potential sources, including ministry of health communications staff.
“We want the media to understand us, but we never try to understand them,” said Mr. Joseph
Kamotho, Senior Communications Officer at Kenya’s Ministry of Health. “As a sector, we need
to wake up. The media has the role of agenda setting. We want them to understand our agenda
and buy into it so we can move together. We need to do media better.”
Breaking Down Barriers, Telling Better Stories
There are many ways to report on these stories:
by highlighting evidence-based health priorities,
analyzing health budgets,identifying gaps between
national health statistics and health spending,
explaining new health policies,fact-checking
sensational stories,and dispelling rumors with facts.
The media can shine a light on these important
and often underreported issues by connecting
the dots for the public,civil society organizations,
and decision-makers to fully understand health
priorities and the funding and governance issues
behind them.For example,when the national
budget is presented,a potential news story could
cover the overall changes in the budget from the
previous year and over time.It could also compare
funding for the health sector with other sectors
or with neighboring countries’ health budgets.
A feature story could investigate a particular
health issue,such as maternal mortality,and
include an analysis of the funds and resources
dedicated to address the issue.If there is a disease
outbreak or specific ongoing health challenge,
such as Ebola,HIV/AIDS,or malaria,how are
health policies addressing this disease or failing
to?What would be needed in terms of resources
and governance to improve health outcomes?
10. 4 ▬ The Health Finance and Governance Briefing Kit
Photo Credit:Valerie Cardas/Johns Hopkins Center for Communication Programs,
2012/Courtesy of Photoshare
11. Stories from Around the World ▬ 5
Example 1: Health Engineering
Officials Booked for Corruption
This article,published by Dawn newspaper in
Pakistan,uses information from the Punjab Province
Anti-Corruption Establishment,a public oversight
institution,to report on corruption within the
Pakistan health sector. The article highlights two
STORIES FROM AROUND THE WORLD
GUJRANWALA, Nov 25: The Anti-Corruption Establishment (ACE) on Monday registered cases against six
officials of the Public Health Engineering Department (PHED), including two executive engineers, as many sub-
divisional officers, an accountant and a sub-engineer.
Reports said ACE Director Muhammad Ilyas Gil had received complaints that development schemes were
completed with defective and substandard material while two executive engineers Arshad Ali and Ahmad
Manzoor, SDOs Zulfikar and Riaz, District Accounts Officer Nazar Bhatti and Sub-Engineer Mudassar were
involved in corruption.
The ACE director ordered an inquiry into the allegations and appointed Deputy Director Technical Ijaz Akbar
Bhatti as inquiry officer. The accused were found guilty and corruption cases were recommended against them.
The ACE also registered corruption cases against Gujrat revenue patwari Khizar Hayat and Tetley Sub-
Inspector Riaz Ahmad.
Meanwhile, 29 health officials of anti-polio teams were issued show-cause notices while five others were
transferred by the executive district officer health when he found them absent from duty during his surprise
visit to the Tehsil Headquarters (THQ) Hospital, Kamoki.
Reports said that when EDO Health Dr Pervaiz Nazir Tarar paid a surprise visit to the civil hospital and deputy
director health’s office at 9am and checked the attendance of employees, he found about 34 health officials
absent from duty.
The second phase of anti-polio drive in the area would continue until Nov 30.
[Excerpt] Dawn News, Pakistan, November 26, 2013
Health Engineering Officials Booked for Corruption
types of health sector corruption or mismanagement:
the use of substandard construction materials and
health worker absenteeism.Corruption and lack of
accountability in how health resources are spent are
important factors impacting health governance.
The following are three examples of newspaper articles on different aspects of health finance and
governance. These examples give a sense of the wide range of possible health finance and governance
stories – from local level health worker issues, to national level health policy and budgeting.
12. 6 ▬ The Health Finance and Governance Briefing Kit
Example 2: Mixed News about
Health Budget
This article, published by Uganda’s New Vision
newspaper, details the political debate over
the annual budget for the health sector. The
annual budget is central to health finance and
outlines the government’s financial commitments
and health priorities for the year ahead.
The budget can highlight policy differences between
political parties and advocates for different interest
groups within the health sector. The budget
debate also often draws attention to government
performance in health. This article states the
government’s position on their performance in
increasing the number of health workers.
By Chris Kiwawulo
The status of a country’s health sector is undoubtedly one of the core yardsticks upon which its
overall growth and development is judged. However, Uganda’s budgetary allocation towards the
health sector has been fluctuating, at least in the past four financial years.
Whereas health activists have, for long, been advocating for a continuous increase in the health
sector budget, it has been inconsistent. Besides, the health budget has, for many years, been
falling short of the 15% Abuja Declaration target. Heads of state of African Union countries,
including President Yoweri Museveni, set the target in April 2001.
In the financial year (2013/14), the health sector has received sh940b, up from sh852b in 2012/13.
This means the sector has received about 7.2% of the national budget of sh13.1 trillion, which
is still below the 15% target. Last year, the health sector got about 7.6%, while in 2011/12, it got
slightly over 8%.
In 2010/11, the allocation to health was sh660b and it leaped to sh985.58b in the subsequent year
(2011/12). However, the drop by sh133.58b in the following year (2012/13) to sh852b left many
health activists’ tongues wagging.
The Government would have reduced it further by another sh52b to go to the defence ministry
had it not been for the intervention of MPs. They argued that more funding was needed to cater
for an increase in the number of medics and their pay.
Since it was the Government that had promised to recruit more health workers and increase their
salary, the decision makers realised that reducing the budgetary allocation to health would be
shooting their own foot.
Indeed, finance minister Maria Kiwanuka, while reading the budget on Thursday, announced
that last financial year (2012/13) has seen the Government recruit 6,172 health workers and
double the monthly pay for doctors at health centre IVs from sh1.2m to sh2.5m.
[Excerpt] NewVision,Uganda,June 19,2013
Health Budget Increased, but…
13. Stories from Around the World ▬ 7
Example 3: Health Workers Strike at
Government Hospitals
This article, published by IRIN Africa, dives into
the impact of Malawi’s health worker strike on
ordinary people. Workers struck because they had
not been paid – a problem in many countries.
A lack of strong governance was behind the
government’s inability to pay workers. The strike
is one way that the government is being held
accountable, and a way for health care workers to
voice their concerns.
LILONGWE, 24 October 2013 (IRIN) - Extensive looting of public funds by government officials in
Malawi has dangerously undermined the country’s public health sector, with hundreds of public health
workers striking in recent weeks to protest late payments of their September salaries.
The delays were the result of a financial scandal involving government officials who exploited
loopholes in a government payment system to make fraudulent deposits into the accounts of companies
that did not have government contracts. Up to 20 billion kwacha (US$5.3 million) was siphoned from
public funds, according to the Financial Intelligence Unit, a government organ.
The health worker strike, which started in early October, crippled operations at public hospitals, which
are also experiencing depleted budgets for essential medical equipment and drugs.
“My three-year-old daughter had a fever, and I went to our district hospital to seek medical attention,
but I came back without any. I found the staff at the hospital just lying around,” said Laurine
Mwangupili of Karonga District, in Malawi’s Northern Region. “They told us that they could not attend
to patients because they had not been paid their salaries.”
A health worker at the hospital, who did not wish to be named, said all the facility’s technical staff -
including nurses, clinical officers and medical assistants - participated in the strike.
Workers at the country’s two largest referral hospitals - Kamuzu Central Hospital in Lilongwe and
Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital in Blantyre - and at Dedza and Salima district hospitals also went on
strike after the salary delays. They said they would be willing to strike again if this month’s salaries are
delayed.
Martha Kwataine, executive director of the NGO Malawi Health Equity Network, raised the alarm
over the effect of corruption on the already underfunded health sector earlier this year.
“We have been saying that the health sector in this country is being crippled because of corruption,”
Kwataine told IRIN. “As a country, we cannot retain specialist medical personnel because we lose our
money this way. As a result, we keep sending patients to countries like Tanzania to receive specialized
treatment” for diseases like cancer.
[Excerpt] IRIN News Africa, October 24, 2013
Government Corruption “Cripples”
Malawi’s Health Sector
14. 8 ▬ The Health Finance and Governance Briefing Kit
15. Why Cover Health Finance and Governance Issues? ▬ 9
WHY COVER HEALTH FINANCE
AND GOVERNANCE ISSUES?
The following rationale underscores why covering
health finance and governance stories is important
for a country’s progress,presented as four
major dimensions of the health sector:Equity,
Sustainability, Accountability,and Performance.
Each theme is also linked to the human dimension
of health finance and governance issues.
Covering health finance and governance stories can be challenging. The issues are complex and require
time and written material to provide sufficient background information. Stories often deal with
multiple institutions and organizations – and interaction among different institutions. It can also take time
to illustrate the human dimension of these stories.
16. 10 ▬ The Health Finance and Governance Briefing Kit
Equity
Questions of health equity – that is, the
differences in the quality of health and
access to health care across different populations
in a country or region – are central to human
development, to better health outcomes, and to
individuals and families who rely on public health
services. These questions are also strongly linked
to health finance and governance.
Health equity questions might include:
zz Do certain groups—by socio-economic status,
geographic location, ethnicity, gender, education,
and/or disability—need more in terms of public
health services or investments in public health
than others?
zz Do certain groups benefit more from public
health services or investments in public health
than others?
zz Does the quality of public health services
reflect socio-economic status, geographic
location, ethnicity, gender, education, and/or
disability differences?
zz Are there certain health services that benefit
some groups over others?
zz Are public resources targeted toward those
who need health services the most? How is this
targeting achieved and how often is it updated?
zz What population segments are not treated
equitably?
For journalists,important questions related to
health equity are:
zz Who (individuals or institutions) is responsible
for ensuring equity issues are integrated into
health policy and program decisions?
zz Who benefits more from health service
delivery and access to services and who is left
out? What is the impact of this inequity?
zz What are the actions the government is taking
to address inequity?
zz What is the impact of health inequity on
people’s lives, the country’s development, and
economic growth?
zz When did decisions and policies lead to
inequity?
zz When does health inequity most affect those
being left out?
zz Where is health inequity concentrated?
zz Where are the government institutions
or bodies where health equity should be
addressed?
The following article is an example of what
health equity reporting looks like.In the Eastern
Cape of SouthAfrica,groups are protesting
poor access to health services,particularly for
people with HIV/AIDS and tuberculosis.
17. Why Cover Health Finance and Governance Issues? ▬ 11
By Ina Skosana, Amy Green
Health advocacy organisations are up in arms over the deteriorating state of the Eastern Cape’s public
health system. The Eastern Cape Health Crisis Action Coalition, which includes groups such as
Section27, the Treatment Action Campaign and the Rural Doctors Association of South Africa, will
deliver a memorandum of grievances to the province’s health MEC Sicelo Gqobana as part of their
“right to health” campaign, which was launched in Johannesburg and East London on Wednesday.
Vuyokazi Matiso of the Treatment Action Campaign in the province said access to health is “being
made to look like a privilege” because many people don’t get the medical care they need.
“Patients are being turned away from health facilities without essential drugs and there have been
cases of people going to test for HIV and being told that there are no test kits available,” she said.
“This is a crisis and it has been going on for some time now.”
The coalition first investigated essential drug stock-outs in the province’s Mthatha depot between
September 2012 and January 2013. The investigation found that over half of the facilities served by
the depot had run out of HIV and tuberculosis medication.
The investigation resulted in a report that included suggestions of how these problems could be
solved being delivered to Eastern Cape health authorities. A follow-up investigation released at the
National Aids Conference in June this year showed that not much had changed. The report noted
that “continued staff shortages and lack of management” at the depot contributed to the stock-outs of
essential medicines.
Numerous attempts to meet with the MEC by the coalition have been met with disinterest, the
coalition said, so Matiso said she hopes a “march for health” scheduled for Friday will pressure the
department into action. “We have no other platforms to share the challenges of the community. Even
now we don’t know if he will be there to accept our memorandum on Friday,” she said.
Around 2 000 healthcare workers, civil society and community members are expected to march the
2km from Bisho Stadium to the provincial legislature.
The provincial health department has been plagued by staff and equipment shortages as well as
doctor strikes. The coalition previously called on the health minister to place the department under
administration.
Matiso said both patients and health professionals are “suffering” because of a lack of leadership on
the part of the MEC. The march and its call to action are a result of a special Section27 and Treatment
Action Campaign investigative report into the “collapsing health system in the Eastern Cape”.
[Excerpt] Mail and Guardian,South Africa,September 11,2013
Eastern Cape Health Access
‘Made to look Like a Privilege’
18. 12 ▬ The Health Finance and Governance Briefing Kit
zz How are policymakers and the health sector
preparing for future health resource needs?
zz Are educational facilities producing enough
health professionals with the right skills?
zz Does medium-term budgeting reflect
changes in health needs?
zz Are health facilities being maintained and
built to keep up with populations changes?
For journalists,important questions on health
sustainability are:
zz Who (individuals and institutions) is responsible
for ensuring planning for sustainable health
resources?
zz Who might be left out if sustainable planning
and resource allocation does not occur?
zz What are the actions the government is taking
to address sustainability? Is it taking place
quickly enough?
zz What is the impact of unsustainability in the
health sector on people’s lives, the country’s
development, and economic growth?
zz When did decisions and policies lead to
sustainable/unsustainable health planning?
zz When might the lack of sustainability begin to
start affecting those being left out?
zz Where are the government institutions or
oversight bodies where health sustainability
should be addressed?
The following article highlights issues of health
sustainability.InTanzania,the shortage of health
workers is a significant challenge to the delivery of
adequate health services. As the population grows
and health challenges become more complex,this
situation will only become more pronounced.
Sustainability
Issues of the sustainability of health services,
particularly around the financing of health
services, focus on the current and future level
of resources needed to address the changing
health needs of the population. While financial
resources are important, the sustainability of
human resources for health (number and skills
of health workers), information systems (ability
to manage increasingly complex and voluminous
health information), and physical resources (health
infrastructure, including number, location and
quality of health facilities), are also fundamental to
health sustainability.
Health sustainability questions might include:
zz Are the resources (financial, human,
infrastructure) sufficient to address the future
health needs of the country?
zz What are the major demographic and health
trends that will change the need for health
resources?
zz Does the planning for health resources
take into account the country’s evolving
demographic trends (e.g., Is there a youth bulge,
an aging population, increased urbanization,
etc.)?
zz Does the current planning for health resources
take into account the changing burden of
diseases, especially non-communicable diseases,
such as cancer and diabetes?
zz Is economic growth being translated into
additional resources for health?
19. Why Cover Health Finance and Governance Issues? ▬ 13
THE government had until May, this year, employed a total of 5,600 health workers out of the
required 9,000, in a quest to minimize the shortage of medical workers, the National Assembly
was told here on Monday.
A Deputy Minister in the Prime Minister’s Office (Regional Administration and Local
Government – Education), Mr Majaliwa Kassim Majaliwa, told the august House that the
government envisages engaging 3,400 more health workers this fiscal year to seal the shortage
gap.
Mr Majaliwa was answering a supplementary question floated in the House by Ms Cynthia Hilda
Ngoye, who wished to know when the shortage of health workers would eventually come to an
end. He assured the Special Seats legislator that some of the new medics would be shunted to
Mbeya.
In her main question Ms Ngoye had sought to know when Igawilo Health Centre in the city of
Mbeya would be elevated to district designate hospital. He said the officials from the Ministry
of Health and Social Welfare inspected the health centre on October 29, last year to see its
suitability.
The inspectors were satisfied that Igawilo Health Centre is good enough to qualify for elevation
to the status of regional hospital. However, it was suggested that a theatre room; a children’s
ward; a maternity ward; a pharmacy block; more patient beds and mortuary deep freezers be
added.
Mr Majaliwa told the House that in 2012/13 the government has set aside 120m/- for completion
of ongoing construction of the wards which will accommodate ailing children and pregnant
women. The money will also cover the purchases of deep freezers and surgical tools. The status
of the health centre will be elevated soon after the missing wards and other facilities have been
made available.
Daily News,Tanzania, July 24, 2012
Over 5,000 Health Workers Employed
20. 14 ▬ The Health Finance and Governance Briefing Kit
For journalists,important questions on health
accountability are:
zz Who is responsible for ensuring health sector
accountability at the national, regional, local and
facility level?
zz Who gets hurt the most due to corruption and
lack of accountability in health service delivery?
Who benefits?
zz What are the actions the government is taking
to address accountability?
zz What is the impact of strong/weak
accountability in the health sector on people’s
lives, the country’s development, and economic
growth?
zz When do decisions and policies lead to
improved/poor accountability in health? Who
benefits from these decisions?
zz When might weak/strong accountability begin
to start affecting health outcomes more
systematically?
zz Where (geographically or at what level of the
health system) is poor health accountability
concentrated?
zz Where are the internal and external
bodies that are monitoring health sector
accountability? What are they finding?
The following article highlights issues of
health accountability.In Bangladesh,pervasive
corruption permeates all sectors,including health.
Corruption touches all levels of the health system
– how funds are spent,how health workers get
promoted,how contracts to build new facilities
are awarded. This misappropriation happens
because of a weak accountability system.
Accountability
Accountability in the health sector involves
issues of corruption, oversight and the
responsiveness of public health officials towards
recipients of health services. Strong accountability
is often the result of a system of checks and
balances and multiple stakeholders–both internal
and external. Internal accountability includes
policies and processes for approvers to spend
money and make resource decisions, and the
supervisory system within institutions. External
accountability includes public oversight institutions
(anti-corruption bodies, parliamentary standing
committees, supreme audit institutions) that
monitor how public resources are used, as well
as civil society watchdog groups, media and
community groups.
Health accountability questions might include:
zz Are health resources being used efficiently and
effectively?
zz Are public officials held to account when
programs and policies do not have their
intended impact?
zz Are public officials held to account when public
health funds are not spent effectively?
zz Are there formal opportunities for health
services recipients to provide feedback on the
quality of health services?
zz What institutions are responsible for
conducting oversight over the health sector?
zz Is accountability in the health sector getting
better or worse?
zz How does the lack of accountability affect
health service delivery and achievement of
health goals?
zz Is the government meeting the domestic and
international commitments it has made to
providing health resources or implementing
health programs?
21. Why Cover Health Finance and Governance Issues? ▬ 15
Recruitment, transfer and promotion in public health sector involve bribes up to Tk 10 lakh
in each case, says a new report released by the Transparency International Bangladesh (TIB)
yesterday.
Ruling party men, officials at the Directorate General of Health Services (DGHS) and civil
surgeon’s office and trade union leaders are mostly engaged in the corruption, the report said at a
press conference at Hotel Abakash in the city.
The study also found doctors at the private sector get 30-50 percent commission from diagnostic
centres for referring patients.
Many doctors at district and upazila hospitals remain off-duty during office hours, while patients
are suggested to go to private diagnostic centres or chambers.
Patients at the public hospitals also have to pay bribes for beds, tests, ambulance and other
services.
TIB Executive Director Dr Iftekharuzzaman said it is a matter of concern that corruption has
been institutionalised in the health sector.
Because of such irregularities, people are losing confidence in healthcare in Bangladesh, he
added. Those who can afford are going abroad for treatment though the country has made great
achievements in reducing birth, child and maternal death rates and increasing life expectancy.
Responding to a query, Iftekharuzzaman said the anomalies found in the study are not applicable
for all doctors or officials, but these are common phenomena in the sector.
“Healthcare could have been much better had we checked the anomalies.”
Bribery
The range of bribes for recruitment, transfers or promotions is Tk 10,000 to Tk 10 lakh, said
Taslima Akhter, TIB Programme Manager (Research and Policy), who presented the report titled
“Governance challenges in health sector and the way forward”.
“In some cases, more people are recruited than is required. Even bribe is collected just on an
assurance of recruitment,” she said.
Besides, political influence and lobbying are used for transfer or remaining in a privileged facility
for longer period. For promotion of teachers, experience, seniority and publications are often not
considered.
“Some officials or physicians get training facilities not necessary for them.”
[Excerpt] Daily Star, Bangladesh, November 7, 2014
Bribe for Everything
22. 16 ▬ The Health Finance and Governance Briefing Kit
Performance
Performance in the health sector involves the
government’s ability to develop effective health
policies and then deliver quality health services to
the public, from national referral hospitals down
to rural health facilities. With increased use of
performance-based financing (the transfer for
funding based on predetermined performance
standards) and performance-based incentives
(payments, including salaries, made based on
achieving results) in the health sector, there is
more information and data on performance than
ever before. Likewise, clients expect increasing
levels of performance as there is more competition
in the health sector, including from the private
sector.
Health performance questions might include:
zz How are performance standards being used to
improve health programming?
zz What are the performance standards and
targets being used? How have they been
developed? Is that data publicly available?
zz How has performance within the health sector
improved over time?
zz What do citizens believe about the
performance of the health sector?
zz How does government track health
performance–at the facility level, regionally and
nationally? How do external stakeholders track
health performance?
zz Who benefits from the standard of
performance in the health sector?
zz Is performance consistent? Are there areas
(socio-economic status, geographic location,
ethnicity, gender, education, disability) that are
not benefiting from improved performance?
zz Is the focus on performance consistent
throughout all levels of the health sector or
only at the national level?
zz How can citizens use health sector
performance information to influence their
health decisions?
For journalists,important accountability questions
related to health are:
zz Who is responsible for measuring and assessing
health sector performance at the national,
regional, local, and facility level?
zz Who gets hurt the most due to poor
performance in health service delivery? Who
benefits?
zz What are the actions the government is taking
to address performance?
zz What is the impact of poor performance in the
health sector on people’s lives, the country’s
development, and economic growth? What is
the impact of positive performance?
zz When did decisions and policies lead to
changes in health performance?
zz When might poor/improved health
performance begin to start affecting health
outcomes more systematically?
zz Where (geographically or at what level of
the health system) is poor/improved health
performance concentrated?
zz Where are the internal and external bodies
that are monitoring health sector performance?
What are they finding?
zz Where is information on health sector
performance (systemically or at the facility
level) available to the public?
The following article highlights issues around
the health sector’s performance.In Kenya,audits
are conducted to assess hospital performance.
The resulting rankings can be useful for
consumers as they make decisions about where
they get their health care and for hospitals to
improve their management and policies.
23. Why Cover Health Finance and Governance Issues? ▬ 17
By Francis Ngige and Boniface Gikandi
A new audit has exposed the sorry state of Government hospitals. Most have dilapidated facilities
that can barely cope with emergencies and do not adhere to clinical guidelines. The audit
conducted by Ministry of Medical Services established scores of hospitals have failed to live up to
their billing, raising queries about the safety of patients and competence of medical staff.
In the audit conducted last month, hospitals have been ranked according to their performance
on an array of issues including use of clinical guidelines, safety, hygiene, nursing care and waste
management. Other areas audited by a team of experts from the Ministry are referral strategies,
human resources, management, infrastructure and equipment. According to the audit, 56
hospitals scored below 50 on emergency preparedness against a score of 100. Shockingly, 18
hospitals did not have any form of emergency preparedness and scored zero.
On the list of shame are Kericho, Lodwar, Uasin Gishu, Kisii, Iten, Entebbes, Eldama Ravine,
Lopiding, Nakuru Annex, Elwak and Kajiado hospitals. Others are Longisa, Molo, Modogashe,
Mandera, Dadaab and Mathari.
The performance was found to be dismal, with a whopping 62 of 99 hospitals sampled being
ranked as “poor”. Twenty-two scored “good” while the rest were rated as “fair”, according to the
list seen by The Standard. Murang’a™ a District Hospital is rated the best, followed by Kitale and
Machakos. Dadaab Sub-district Hospital in North Eastern Province is at the bottom of the list,
just below Mautuma and Mandera District Hospital.
Emergency preparedness
Director of Medical Services Francis Kimani said the audit was being studied to establish
necessary reforms to improve service delivery. “After some time, we will use the data to measure
what improvements have been made by the different public hospitals,” said the director.
Mr Kimani said the concept used is the same as that of performance contracts, where staffs are
appraised against a set of targets.
The Standard Media, Kenya, August 24, 2009
Public Hospitals’ List of Shame Now Out
24. 18 ▬ The Health Finance and Governance Briefing Kit
25. Essentials of Health Finance ▬ 19
ESSENTIALS OF HEALTH FINANCE
Most health systems in the developing world are
characterized by mixed public and private financing
and delivery of care.For a health system to perform
well – that is,to provide needed,good-quality health
services to all who need the services – public
and private financing agents need to:generate an
appropriate amount of revenue from all sources
relative to what is possible in the country;pool risk
effectively;create appropriate incentives for quality
service provision from all providers including public,
private,and not-for-profit;and allocate resources
to the most effective,efficient,and equitable
interventions and services irrespective of the sector.
Protecting people from this financial risk and ruin
is at the heart of UHC.Sound health financing will
be essential to expanding UHC in low- and middle-
income countries.Each country will need to develop
its own path to achieving this goal based on its
resources,health priorities,and leadership.But as the
experience in the United States and other countries
has shown,UHC is not easy to achieve.Still,it is an
important concept and goal for countries to consider.
Health financing,however,is complex – full of
technical terms,numbers,and economic theory,
which are not necessarily a journalist’s comfort
zone.With that in mind,HFG’s technical experts
selected the following resources by prominent
health finance topics areas to serve as an
essential collection of clearly written,reliable
resources to assist journalists as they report
and write health news and feature stories.
Financing or paying for health care is a universal story that cuts across national boundaries, impacting
virtually every family on the planet. When health systems have sufficient funding and resources that
are managed well through good governance structures, more people will be able to access the quality
health care they need, at prices they can afford. But in many countries, health systems do not function
well because of inadequate resources and the poor use of existing resources. Even in well-financed
health systems, policymakers and leaders still have to make tough choices about what health priorities
to support, and all possible health needs cannot be met. However, choices can be made to reflect stated
policies, enhance health gains, and ensure financial protection.
26. 20 ▬ The Health Finance and Governance Briefing Kit
Health Budgeting
The International Budget Partnership (IBP)
offers an overview of the basics of public
budgeting, including the budget cycle, why
budgets are important, who is involved in the
process, and how civil society organizations can
engage. “At the heart of IBP’s work are efforts to
make government budgeting more transparent
and participatory, more responsive to national
priorities, better able to resist corruption, and
more efficient and effective,” their website says.
Health Sector BudgetAdvocacy: A guide for civil
society organizations explains why health budget
advocacy is important and includes a section on
the health sector’s key elements,including how
health budgets are funded. The guide discusses
budget basics (such as what a budget is,and how
the budget cycle works),health budget advocacy
and strategy,and health budget analysis.
Health Finance
The “What is health financing?” chapter of the
Health Systems Assessment Manual defines
health financing and its key components and
describes the process of–public and private–
resource flows in a health system. It also
provides information to better understand the
strengths and weaknesses of a country’s type of
health financing.
TheWHO Global Health Observatory is a
portal to health-related statistics from around
the world. The aim of theWHO portal is to
provide access to country data and statistics
with a focus on comparable estimates,theme
pages–including health financing–covering
global health priorities such as the health-
related Millennium Development Goals,and
including links to relevant publications relevant
and web pages withinWHO and elsewhere.
Harmonization for Health is a“regional
mechanism through which collaborating
partners agree to focus on providing support
to governments inAfrica on particularly in the
areas of Health Financing–including Evidence
Based Budgeting,Results Based Financing and
Health Insurance–Human Resources for Health,
Pharmaceuticals and Supply Chains,Governance,
Service Delivery,Monitoring and Evaluation,and
Infrastructure and ICT.”The website features
communities of practice,a blog,and news.
TheWorld Health Report 2010:the role of
innovative financing mechanisms for health
defines“innovative financing,” describes successful
innovative financing mechanism models,
presents a framework to assess innovative
financing mechanisms,and describes challenges
associated with innovative financing models.
27. Essentials of Health Finance ▬ 21
In the working paper,Innovative Financing for Global
Health: Tools forAnalyzing the Options,the authors
share practical guidance about how to think about,
understand,and evaluate different innovative health
financing options.It is designed to help decision
makers,practitioners,and other stakeholders
who are interested in,and need to make choices
about,innovative health financing issues.
A report by the Institute for Health Metrics and
Evaluation at the University ofWashington,Financing
Global Health 2013: Transition in an Age of Austerity is
the fifth annual report on global health expenditure.
“This year’s updated estimates show that despite
lackluster economic growth and fiscal cutbacks in
many developed countries,total assistance remained
steady,reaching an all-time high of $31.3 billion in
2013. While annual increases have leveled off since
2010,continued international funding is a sign of the
international development community’s enduring
support for global health. The report also shows
shifts in sources of financing. As funding from many
bilateral donors and development banks has declined,
growth in funding from the GAVIAlliance,the Global
Fund to FightAIDS,Tuberculosis and Malaria,non-
governmental organizations,and the UK government
is counteracting these cuts.Development assistance
for different health issues is tracked up to 2011,
revealing that the greatest increase in funding
was for maternal,newborn,and child health.”
Health Insurance
The Health Insurance Handbook offers practical
information about health insurance concepts,
identifies different design and implementation
challenges, and defines realistic steps for the
development and scaling up of equitable, efficient,
and sustainable health insurance schemes.
TheWHO brief,“Thinking of introducing social
health insurance?Ten Questions,” explains
social health insurance and describes how it can
contribute to help strengthen the health system
and benefit members of the insurance scheme.
In the advocacy paper,National health insurance
inAsia andAfrica: Advancing equitable Social
Health Protection to achieve universal health
coverage,UNICEF explores how different forms
of national health insurance and other social health
protection mechanisms help countries achieve
UHC. The authors explain the different types of
health insurance and share country examples.
In the article Community-Based Health Insurance
(CBHI): An EvolutionaryApproach toAchieving
Universal Coverage in Low-Income Countries,the
authors“summarize the development of CBHI as a way
to achieve universal coverage in low-income countries
through three stages:the basic model,the enhanced
model,and the nationwide model. They also describe
the characteristics of each model,as well as its potential
for and challenges to achieving universal coverage.”
The brief Scaling Up Community-Based Health
Insurance in Mali describes the government-led process
of building consensus to reach a national strategy for
the roll-out of CBHI.For more than 20 years,CBHI
has been a component of the health financing system
in Mali.Known as mutual health organizations,or
mutuelles in French,CBHI schemes are not-for-profit
mechanisms of health financing grounded in principles
of solidarity and risk sharing. The Government of
Mali uses mutuelles to address limited access to
and low utilization of priority health services.
28. 22 ▬ The Health Finance and Governance Briefing Kit
Resource Tracking
As health systems grow in complexity, so does
health financing. Increasingly, low- and
middle-income governments use National Health
Accounts (NHA) to understand their country’s
health spending – where the money comes from,
who decides how it is spent, and where and what
types of health services are being purchased. The
brief Institutionalizing National Health Accounts
Pays Off describes three countries experiences
with NHA.
The Primer for Policymakers:Understanding the
National HealthAccounts Process outlines the
steps involved in conducting NHA and how NHA
data can be used. The document is intended for
individuals who are new to NHA and who are
interested in gaining a basic understanding of
the health accounts concept. Topics covered in
this primer include:overview of the concept and
purpose of NHA,country experiences with NHA,
the NHA framework and classification system,
assembling an NHA team,collecting and analyzing
data,and the use of NHA for policy purposes.
WHO’s NHA website answers basic questions
about NHA and also the updated 2011 System
of HealthAccounts (SHA 2011).NHA data
can help in developing national strategies for
effective health financing and in raising additional
funds for health.Information can be used to
make financial projections of a country’s health
system requirements and compare their own
experiences with the past or with those of other
countries,according to the website. The website
also includes the Global Health Expenditure
database,which features expenditure information
on health for 1995-2009 for member states.
The Kenya NHA subaccounts policy brochures
offer quick,visual interpretations of key findings
from the 2012 Kenya NHA (general NHA,
Tuberculosis,Reproductive Health,Malaria,HIV/
AIDS,Child health).NHA are comprised of a
standard set of tables that presents various aspects
of a nation’s health expenditures.It encompasses
total health spending in a country – including
public,private,and donor expenditures.
The Health Finance & Governance Project supports
USAID’s quest for stronger health systems that
deliver quality,affordable health care.Strong health
governance is necessary to ensure that resources,
including domestic financing,devoted to the health
sector achieve their intended results. The project
website provides case studies,reports,tool kits,and
other resources that explain the critical link between
stronger health governance and better health.
29. Essentials of Health Finance ▬ 23
Universal Health Coverage (UHC)
“Universal Health Coverage:Five Questions,” a short
Q&A about UHC,provides clear,concise information
about UHC and the role of health financing.Coupled
with“Ten Facts about UHC” both documents offer
a short and insightful overview of the concept.
In its 2010World Health Report,“Health Systems
financing:the path to Universal Health Coverage,”
theWHO describes what countries can do to
modify their financing systems to achieve UHC.
The report includes new research and lessons
learned from different country’s experiences.
TheWHO video,“The many paths toward universal
health coverage,” provides an overview and history
of UHC and the associated challenges and benefits.
It uses case studies of countries that are making
progress with UHC,such as China,Mexico,Oman,
Rwanda,Thailand,andTurkey. These country
examples help to address the pivotal UHC questions:
Who is covered?Which services are covered and at
what level of quality? How are the services paid for?
The Joint Learning Network for Universal Health
Coverage (JLN) is a practitioner-to-practitioner
learning network that connects low- and middle-
income countries with one another so that they can
learn from one another’s successes and challenges
with implementing UHC,jointly solve problems,
and collectively produce and use new knowledge,
tools,and innovative approaches to accelerate
country progress and avoid‘recreating the wheel’.
TheWorld Bank’s Universal Health Coverage
series takes a close look at the experiences of 22
countries in expanding health coverage to the poor
and vulnerable. The papers look at the“nuts and
bolts” of these programs,and discuss what worked
and what did not.Countries include Chile,India,
Kenya,the Philippines,andVietnam,among others.
Photo Credit: Derek Brown/USAID, 2012,C
ourtesy of Photoshare
30. 24 ▬ The Health Finance and Governance Briefing Kit
31. Essentials of Health Governance ▬ 25
Health governance is needed at all levels of the
health system to ensure precious resources
devoted to the health sector actually achieve their
intended results,namely better access to health
care and improved health.Policymakers and donors
agree that strong health governance at all levels
is necessary to ensure that resources devoted to
the health sector achieve their intended results.
Rising income levels in some countries represent
an opportunity to improve health services.Strong
health governance—that is,effective stewardship
of the health sector and its resources—is essential
to ensure the correlation between increased
spending in health and a healthier population.
Increased transparency and civil society engagement
can promote the effective use of health care funds.
In addition,health governance policies developed
with stakeholder input and bolstered with economic
analysis can yield more sustainable health benefits.
The media plays a critical role in improving
health governance by analyzing and sharing
data,informing civil society about health policy
debates,comparing health data with budgets,
and sharing information from ministries of
health and other key health sector actors.
ESSENTIALS OF HEALTH GOVERNANCE
In particular,the media can highlight governance
issues by covering stories from different angles,
including:
zz Transparency – by increasing public access to
health programming, budget information, and
outcomes;
zz Accountability – by clarifying delineation
of authorities for health programming and
expenditures and external pressure for results;
zz Oversight – by reviewing the results of health
investments by institutions and independent
entities (parliaments, oversight institutions);
zz Responsiveness – by linking health policy and
expenditures with public priorities; and
zz Integrity/Ethics – by investigating ethical
management and standards among health
professionals.
With these angles in mind,HFG’s technical experts
selected the following governance resources to
serve as an essential collection of reliable,clear
resources to assist journalists when reporting
on or writing health news and feature stories.
When it comes to health systems, governance is most apparent when it is missing or weak. Clinics
are not adequately staffed. Immunization rates decline. There are frequent stock outs of essential
drugs. Disease prevalence increases. Ordinary people spend far too much of their own money paying for
health services. Too many resources benefit too few people and either cannot be adequately accounted
for or are being directed to areas that provide limited benefit.
32. 26 ▬ The Health Finance and Governance Briefing Kit
Health Governance Resources
The International Budget Partnership’s (IBP)
website offers an overview on the basics
of public budgeting, including the budget cycle,
why budgets are important, who is involved
in the budget process, and how civil society
organizations can get involved. As the website
explains, “At the heart of IBP’s work are efforts
to make government budgeting more transparent
and participatory, more responsive to national
priorities, better able to resist corruption, and
more efficient and effective.” IBP also offers
country-specific budget briefs that offer insights to
how budgets are formed, including spending levels
and public participation.
TheWorld Bank’sWorldwide Governance
Indicators Project reports aggregate and individual
governance indicators for six dimensions of
governance for 215 countries between the years
1996–2012. The dimensions are: Voice and
Accountability;Political Stability andAbsence of
Violence;Government Effectiveness;Regulatory
Quality;Rule of Law;and Control of Corruption.
The U4Anti-Corruption Resource Center
offers a wide range of resources,including a
comprehensive glossary of terms,to help donors
address specific challenges related to corruption.
The Internews report,Media and Global Health:
From Information toAction,shows how establishing,
supporting,and enhancing local information platforms
can contribute significantly to health-seeking behavior
and community mobilization around health issues.
The Media Map Project aims to understand the
interrelations between media development and
outcomes in democracy and governance,economic
growth,poverty reduction,human rights,gender
equality,and health. The project has made 25 data
sets which collectively touch on every country
in the world and makes up to 30 years’ worth of
information available to the public for download
and analysis. The project is a research collaboration
between Internews and theWorld Bank Institute,
funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
The“Leadership and Governance” chapter of
the Health SystemsAssessment Manual defines
leadership and governance of the health sector,
and describes what information is needed to
assess governance as well as different methods
and sources for collecting this information.
33. Essentials of Health Governance ▬ 27
The Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) are
the most comprehensive source of data on real-
life health issues found anywhere in the world.
The DHS program has collected,analyzed,and
disseminated accurate and representative data
on population,health,HIV,and nutrition through
more than 300 surveys in 90 countries.It is
considered the“gold standard” for health statistics,
and offers comparable health data over time.
The Journalists’ Guide to DHS is a user-friendly,
easily accessible guide to understanding DHS
surveys and how to incorporate the data into news
stories.DHS surveys are the most comprehensive
source of data on real-life health issues found
anywhere in the world.Measure DHS population
based surveys provide reliable and accurate
information on HIV/AIDS,malaria,gender,family
planning,maternal and child health,and nutrition
in more than 90 countries.Using data from a
reputable source like the DHS adds credibility
and context to news and feature health stories.
The Global Health Governance Journal website
“is an open access,peer-reviewed online journal
that provides a platform for academics and
practitioners to explore global health issues and
their implications for governance and security
at national and international levels. The journal
provides interdisciplinary analyses and a vigorous
exchange of perspectives that are essential to
the understanding of the nature of global health
challenges and the strategies aimed at their solution.”
The New England Journal of Medicine’s article,
Governance Challenges in Global Health,
offers a high-level view of the state of health
governance worldwide. The article defines
and discusses the importance of good global
governance for health,outlines major challenges
to such governance,and describes the necessary
functions of a global health system.
The WHO offers a clear explanation of
health governance and its role in strengthening
health systems:“Governance in the health
sector refers to a wide range of steering and
rule-making related functions carried out by
governments/decision makers as they seek to
achieve national health policy objectives that
are conducive to universal health coverage”.
The Health Finance & Governance Project supports
USAID’s quest for stronger health systems that
deliver quality,affordable health care.Strong health
governance is necessary to ensure that resources,
including domestic financing,devoted to the health
sector achieve their intended results. The project
website provides case studies,reports,tool kits,and
other resources that explain the critical link between
stronger health governance and better health.
USAID’s Leadership,Management and Governance
Project (LMG) improves leadership,management
and governance practices to strengthen health
systems and improve health for all,including
vulnerable populations worldwide. The LMG
website offers resources to communicate
effective management practices.
Photo Credit: Anil Gulati, 2010, Courtesy of Photoshare
34. 28 ▬ The Health Finance and Governance Briefing Kit
35. Sources for Reporting ▬ 29
National and Local Level Sources
Health Bureaucrats: Health ministries are
very large and complex institutions typically
operating at the national, regional, and local
levels. Getting the organigram of a ministry is
very helpful in identifying the right department.
Often, sources at lower levels of government
are easier to cultivate than at the national level
and may provide references/introductions to
higher level officials.
Other public institutions are also involved
in the health sector. These include disease
specific bodies (HIV/AIDS agencies, etc.),
regulatory agencies (health professional
certification, pharmaceutical testing and
approvals, etc.), health insurance bodies, public
health schools, and public health research
institutions.
Other government officials: Officials from a range
of other ministries – including the Ministries of
Finance, Planning, Labor, Local Government, etc.
– contribute to health service delivery at the
national or local level and may have important
perspectives on health finance and governance
issues.
Health Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs):
Service-oriented NGOs can offer a good sense
of the health sector’s strengths and limitations
SOURCES FOR REPORTING
and can provide details on issues of access to
services for groups vulnerable to poor health
finance and governance.
Health Consumers: Individuals receiving health
services can offer first person perceptions
of health service quality, accountability and
performance of the sector in general or of
specific facilities. These first person angles
to a story can highlight the human interest
dimension of broader health finance and
governance stories.
Think Tanks: Think tank reports that focus
on health issues can be useful in providing
background for complex issues. Experts within
these organizations can also serve as expert
sources to identify possible stories as well as
explain the broader consequences of issues.
Think tanks also may be involved in analyzing
the national budget and are an important
source for stories on trends in government
spending on health.
Parliament: National and subnational parliaments
or councils can provide useful information
on health policy debates, budget figures, and
oversight over key health programs. Members
of these institutions can provide the political
dimension of these issues; staffers also may have
expert knowledge on health issues.
There are many good sources for media coverage of health finance and governance stories. These
sources help provide background on complex topics, avenues for investigation into government
programming, and validation of documentation, statements or press releases.
36. 30 ▬ The Health Finance and Governance Briefing Kit
Oversight Institutions: Institutions such as
a supreme audit agency or national anti-
corruption body can provide a wealth of
information on health sector governance.
Audit reports on the health sector or of
health facilities can highlight cases of waste and
mismanagement.Tracked over time, these can
illustrate systemic problems. Reports or cases
taken up by anti-corruption bodies focus on
individual and system-wide problems in health
service delivery.
Civil Society Organizations (CSOs) focused
on governance and anti-corruption issues
—both at the national and local level—can
be an important source for specific cases of
corruption and the macro-level data on health
system governance.
Donors: In many countries, donors are very active
in supporting health finance and governance
initiatives. Some donors work at the national
level providing technical support to ministries;
others fund projects working to strengthen
systems for health service delivery. These
donors—and their local staff—can offer
important details into key developments at the
local and national levels.
Regional and International Media
Resources and Organizations
This section features hyperlinks to a variety of
international media outlets that cover health
news in low- and middle-income countries,
such asAllAfrica and IRIN.It also includes tools
for journalists,such as the Journalists’ Guide to
Demographic and Health Surveys. These resources
contain links to recent news and feature stories
that cover health finance and/or health governance
issues from around the world. These stories are
good examples of different types of reporting on
important health finance and governance issues.
AllAfrica (in French and English) aggregates,
produces,and distributes news from more than
130African news organizations as well as its own
reporters’ stories.Its offices are in CapeTown,Dakar,
Lagos,Monrovia,Nairobi,andWashington,D.C.
The Journalists’ Guide to Demographic and Health
Surveys (DHS) is a user-friendly,easily accessible
guide to understanding the DHS surveys,and how
to incorporate the health data into news stories.
The Demographic and Health Surveys are an
excellent source of free,reliable health statistics
in low- and middle-income countries worldwide.
These statistics can add important evidence and
data to health stories,especially when linked with
health budget figures and analysis. The guide includes
news and feature stories from around the world.
Using data from a reputable source like the DHS
adds credibility and context to health stories.
Internews is an international non-profit organization
whose mission is to empower local media worldwide
to give people the news and information they need,
the ability to connect,and the means to make their
voices heard.It is an excellent source of media
resources,including health and governance stories
from around the world and tool kits designed for
journalists in low- and middle-income countries.
37. Sources for Reporting ▬ 31
IRIN – or the Integrated Regional Information
Networks – is based in Nairobi,Kenya,and has
regional offices in Johannesburg,Dakar,Dubai and
Bangkok,covering some 70 countries. The bureaus
are supported by a network of local correspondents.
The service is delivered in English,French,and
Arabic,through a free email subscription service
and social media syndication.IRIN is an editorially
independent,non-profit project of the UN Office
for the Coordination of HumanitarianAffairs.
Thomas Reuters Foundation uses its“unique set
of skills to run programmes that trigger change
and empower people:free legal assistance,
media development and in-depth coverage
of the world’s under-reported stories.” The
foundation stands for“human rights,women’s
empowerment,better governance,greater
transparency,and for the rule of law.”
USAID’s Global Health:Science and Practice
Journal (GHSP) is a“no-fee,open-access,
peer-reviewed,online journal.” GHSP aims
“to improve health practice,especially in low-
and middle-income countries,by publishing
current research and program experiences.”
Global Health NOW (GHN) is a forum for news
and information for the global health community.
Launched as a weekday e-newsletter in March
2014,GHN has gathered thousands of subscribers
worldwide who use it as a source for their global
health news. The newsletter turned into a full-
fledged website in March 2015,featuring exclusive
stories and commentaries,breaking news,and news
summaries. The GHN staff scours the global media
and selects the day’s most important articles about
research,trends and events to summarize in the
e-newsletter and on the website.Staff and freelance
writers also create original content including news
articles,commentaries and Q&As.GHN also
regularly publishes op-eds by global experts.
38. 32 ▬ The Health Finance and Governance Briefing Kit
39. Glossary of Terms ▬ 33
GLOSSARY OF TERMS
Abuja Declaration: In September 2000, 189 heads of state adopted the Millennium Declaration designed
to improve social and economic conditions in the world's poorest countries by 2015. This drew
attention to the shortage of resources necessary to improve health in low income settings, resulting
in the Abuja Declaration. In April 2001, heads of state of African Union countries met in Abuja,
Nigeria and pledged to set a target of allocating at least 15% of their annual budget to improve
the health sector. As of March 2011, only one African country has reached that target. Overall, 26
increased the proportion of government expenditures allocated to health and 11 have reduced it
since 2001. In the other 9, there is no obvious trend up or down. Current donor spending varies
dramatically, from US$ 115 per person in one country, to less than US$ 5 per person in 12 others.
Catastrophic Health Expenditures: This is the condition when a household’s expenditures on health are
so high that it impoverishes the household. One study defined expenditure as being catastrophic if
a household’s financial contributions to the health system exceed 40% of income remaining after
subsistence needs have been met. (Xu et al. 2003).
Civil Society: Civil society includes all actors of the health system that are not government or the
commercial private sector. Civil society is often represented by Civil Society Organizations (CSOs).
See below for the definition of CSO. Civil society can play an important role in strengthening the
governance of the health sector by advocating for consumer preferences, providing expert technical
inputs, and performing monitoring functions at the local level.
Civil Society Organizations (CSOs): Civil society organizations (CSOs) are a diverse group of NGOs and
not-for-profit organizations that have a presence in public life and express the interests and values
of their members or others, based on ethical, cultural, political, scientific, religious, or philanthropic
considerations. CSOs refer to organizations such as community groups, NGOs, labor unions,
indigenous groups, charitable organizations, faith-based organizations, professional associations,
political parties, and foundations. The exchange between governments and CSOs, especially those
representing divergent constituencies, can result in better informed health policies and programs
and can increase civil society influence in expressing preference for health services.
Community-based Health Insurance: Community-based health insurance (CBHI) is not-for-profit, private
health insurance that pools members’ premium payments into a collective fund, which is managed by
the members. CBHI plans, typically subsidized by donors or governments, have been shown to reach
marginalized populations and to increase access to health care for low-income rural and informal
sector workers.
Deductible: A deductible is a fixed amount of money that must be paid by an insurance policy holder out-
of-pocket in a given year before an insurer will cover any expenses incurred by the beneficiary.
40. 34 ▬ The Health Finance and Governance Briefing Kit
Domestic Resource Mobilization:“Domestic resource mobilization (DRM)—the process in which
countries transparently raise and spend their own funds to provide for their people – is the long-
term path to sustainable development finance. DRM doesn’t have to mean new taxes or higher
tax rates—governments often see their revenues rise through improved audits or simplified filing
processes.” (USAID)
Financial Risk Protection: In terms of health, financial risk protection means that means that a health
system does not require a person or family to spend more than they can afford on health care.
Fiscal Space: Fiscal space is the term used to describe a government´s ability to raise revenue without
jeopardizing economic stability and sustainability. A government can raise revenue through
administering taxes, selling natural resources, seeking outside grants or donor funding, borrowing
money, and also by cutting expenditures and finding ways to increase efficiencies.
Health Accounts: Health Accounts is an internationally standardized methodology for tracking the flow of
health resources in a country. It is based on the System of Health Accounts (SHA) 2011, an update
to SHA 1.0 (2000) and National Health Accounts (NHA) (2003). Because NHA has had widespread
usage, and hence name recognition, in many low- and middle-income countries, the term “NHA” is
still sometimes used to refer to Health Accounts.
Health Financing: WHO defines health financing as the “function of a health system concerned with
the mobilization, accumulation and allocation of money to cover the health needs of the people,
individually and collectively, in the health system.”
Health Governance: USAID’s priority objectives in health governance are to:“Develop sustainable
country capacity in transparent and accountable law, policy, planning, leadership, and management
to advance shared goals in national agendas; Build capacity of civil society and private sector for
stronger voice and better advocacy to increase government transparency and accountability; and
Engage a new generation of health systems leaders at regional, country, and community levels.”
Health Insurance : Health insurance is a formal arrangement, such as a contract or policy, where insured
persons (beneficiaries) are protected from the costs of medical services covered by their insurance
plan (the benefits). Health insurance works best when risk pools of beneficiaries are large because in
essence the healthy can subsidize the sick. Health insurance can be financed and managed in different
ways, such as by private companies, national schemes, or communities. There are different types of
health insurance available in many countries.
Health System:A health system is the sum total of all the organizations, institutions and resources
whose primary purpose is to improve health. The six building blocks of a health system are: service
delivery; health workforce; health information systems; medical products, vaccines, and technologies;
financing; and leadership and governance.
Health Systems Strengthening: Strengthening the health system is accomplished by comprehensive
changes to policies and regulations, financing mechanisms, organizational structures, and relationships
across the health system building blocks that allow more effective use of resources to improve
multiple health services. By contrast, supporting the health system can include any activity that
improves services, from upgrading facilities and equipment to distributing mosquito nets.
41. Glossary of Terms ▬ 35
Innovative Financing: The term innovative financing has multiple definitions. The Kaiser Family Foundation
describes some common aspects: “… innovative financing mechanisms are typically presented in
contrast to ‘traditional’ mechanisms for raising and delivering aid.‘Traditional’ mechanisms for global
health financing include direct bilateral and multilateral assistance provided by government donors,
or funds channeled through private philanthropy; innovative approaches to raise funds from other
sources or catalyze financing in unique, non-traditional ways […] Innovative financing mechanisms
are meant to add value by raising additional funds and/or make existing funds go farther. They are
meant to be complementary to existing, traditional approaches, but are not designed to displace
or replace them.” This term can also describe domestic innovative financing as well. Domestic
‘innovative’ financing can be thought of as new measures for a country and likely includes things
other than basic general tax revenue or other long established revenue generating measures.
Insurance Beneficiaries: An insurance beneficiary is someone who has health insurance. They can also be
called a subscriber, member, or enrollee.
Investment Case: An evidence-based argument for investment in a specific sector (such as health) or
more typically, the prevention of or response to a specific disease or health issue.
Millennium Development Goals: The Millennium Development Goals were an action plan for the world’s
nations, with United Nations leadership, to achieve eight high-level goals to reduce and reverse the
poverty, hunger, and disease affecting billions of people by 2015.
Mutual Health Organization (MHO): Mutual Health Organizations (MHOs) are known as mutuelles in
French-speaking countries and are another name for community based health insurance. See the
definition of CBHI above.
National AIDS Spending Assessment (NASA): A NASA describes the flow of resources spent on the HIV
response from their origin to the users of the health care services. It offers strategic information
that allows governments to mobilize resources, increase accountability and develop more efficient,
effective program implementation. The main questions addressed are:
zz Who finances the HIV response?
zz Who manages the funds?
zz Who provides the services?
zz What programs are provided?
zz Who benefits from the programs?
zz What resources are consumed in the production of these programs?”
National Health Accounts (NHA): NHA refers to a methodology for health accounting in low- and
middle-income countries that was standardized in 2003 with the publication of the Guide to
Producing NHA (World Bank,WHO, USAID 2003). This guide customized the OECD’s SHA 1.0
to the developing country context. NHA had widespread usage among low- and middle-income
countries globally. The term NHA is now sometimes used to refer to Health Accounts conducted
according to SHA 2011, the updated version of the internationally standardized framework.
42. 36 ▬ The Health Finance and Governance Briefing Kit
National Health Insurance: National health insurance is “… any government-managed insurance plan
seeking to enroll the entire population into some financial and risk-pooling insurance mechanism,
or set of mechanisms, with the aim of removing the financial barriers to attaining UHC.” (UNICEF)
Out-of-Pocket: Out-of-pocket (OOP) refers to the money clients pay at the time of service to
cover the costs of their health services, including medicine, doctor’s fee, laboratory tests, and
hospitalizations It includes formal and informal user fees and any deductible if a client holds
insurance, and differs from prepayment.
Premium: A premium is the amount of money charged for a certain amount of insurance coverage.
The cost of a premium is tied to the benefits package covered by the insurance policy, the cost of
those health services, and estimates about the likelihood individuals or the group will actually use
the benefits.
Prepayment: This is when a consumer of health services makes payments for care before the time when
it is needed. Some examples would be insurance premiums, taxes paid for state-financed care, and
health savings accounts. Prepayment mechanisms are one strategy to mitigate or avoid the risk of
catastrophic health expenditures.
Public Expenditure Tracking Survey (PETS): Public Expenditure Tracking Survey (PETS) is a technique
for tracking the effect of public expenditure on growth and/or social outcomes including health.
It explores the ways in which public expenditures become public goods, by examining service
facilities and surveying firms. A PETS typically collects information on facility characteristics,
financial flows, outputs, accountability arrangements, etc.
Resource Tracking: Resource tracking looks retrospectively at past health expenditures and plays a
critical role in ensuring accountability and transparency. Resource tracking entails collecting and
analyzing expenditure data on the flow of resources through the health sector during a set time,
usually one year.
Risk Pooling: In terms of health insurance, risk pooling means spreading the financial risk of an individual
paying for health care costs across a group of members and across time for an individual.
Members pay premiums to the insurer, who then pools the money to cover costs. The larger and
more diverse (age, gender, etc.) the group is, the more effectively health insurance spreads risk.
Social Health Insurance: Social health insurance (SHI) generally has four features: 1) independent or
quasi-independent management of insurance funds (such as by social security institutes or sickness
funds); 2) compulsory earmarked payroll contributions; 3) a direct link between the contributions
and defined medical benefits for the insured population; and 4) concept of social solidarity. Social
health insurance is sometimes referred to as the Bismarck model due to its origin in Germany.
43. Glossary of Terms ▬ 37
Sustainable Development Goals: In September 2015, the 193 countries of the UN General Assembly
officially adopted the new 2030 Development Agenda, which includes the 17 Sustainable
Development Goals or SDGs.The SDGs will build on the progress achieved under the MDGs.
Goal three,“ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages,” includes health finance
and governance targets. (UN, 2015)
System of Health Accounts (SHA) 2011: SHA 2011 is the basis for Health Accounts, an internationally
standardized methodology that allows countries of all income levels to understand their country’s
health spending – where the money comes from, how it is managed and spent, and where and
what types of health goods and services are purchased. It measures resource flows in a country’s
health system for a given period and reflects the main functions of health care financing: resource
mobilization and allocation, pooling and insurance, purchasing of care and the distribution of
benefits. Health Accounts with SHA 2011 is critical for improving governance and accountability at
the national and international levels of policymaking.
Transparency: Transparency occurs when decisions and actions are taken openly and sufficient
information is available for other agencies, civil society, and the general public procedures are
followed.
Universal Health Coverage: Universal health coverage (UHC) is a health systems goal to provide access
to quality health services to all according to need and without the risk of financial hardship.
Efforts to progress towards UHC are characterized by prioritizing the needs of the poor and
replacing reliance on OOP payments with a progressive and sustainable system for prepayment –
whether that be insurance, general tax based, or another type of financing scheme. The pathway
a country takes to progress towards UHC varies depending on the country’s health finance
resources and governance.
44. 38 ▬ The Health Finance and Governance Briefing Kit
45. Tips for Writing Compelling Stories ▬ 39
TIPS FOR WRITING COMPELLING STORIES
Topics,Tips, and Background Information
Abuja Declaration
zz Several African countries, including Rwanda, have reached the Abuja Declaration target of
dedicating 15% of government funding for the health sector.
zz Overall, 26 countries have increased the proportion of government expenditures allocated to
health and 11 have reduced it since 2001.
zz A WHO report,The Abuja Declaration: TenYears On shows the progress made since 2001
by African Union countries in meeting the Abuja Declaration target and achieving the health
Millennium Development Goals.
Community-based Health Insurance (CBHI)
zz CBHIs are often financed both by the beneficiaries (through premium contributions) and by the
government or a donor organization (through subsidies).
zz In French-speaking countries, CBHI schemes are called mutuelles (mutual health organization)
zz Read more about CBHI in the brief Scaling-Up Community-Based Health Insurance in Mali.
zz The success of a CBHI is measured by whether or not beneficiaries receive the care they
expect at the cost they expected to pay, the number of members reached/enrolled, quality of
and access to health care, and the financial sustainability of the scheme.
The Health Finance and Governance Briefing Kit is designed to help journalists and their editors uncover
and tell important health stories that affect people all around the world. The media can shine a light
on these important and often underreported issues by connecting the dots for the public, civil society
organizations, and decision-makers to fully understand health priorities and the funding and governance of
health resources. This briefing kit was created by journalists who understand the realities of newsroom
deadlines and editors’ expectations. There are many ways that to report these stories – by highlighting
evidence-based health priorities,analyzing health budgets,identifying gaps between national health statistics and
health spending,explaining new health policies,fact-checking sensational stories,and dispelling rumors with
facts. To assist with writing about significant health finance and governance topics,the following table offers tips,
important background information,and key points to highlight.
46. 40 ▬ The Health Finance and Governance Briefing Kit
Financial Risk Protection
zz Financial risk protection is a key component of the movement to progress towards universal
health coverage in low- and middle-income countries.
zz The WHO estimates that 150 million people face “catastrophic expenditure” from paying their
medical bills, meaning that they can’t pay for other necessities, such as food, housing, or education.
Of these, 100 million are forced into poverty every year as a result of the direct health care costs
(fees for medicines, lab tests, and doctors) and indirect costs (transportation, food, lost work).
Read more here.
Health Financing
zz Health financing is a process composed of three main functions - revenue collection, pooling of
resources, and purchasing health services.
zz Revenue collection generally refers to tax revenues.
zz Pooling of funds for health can happen at the national, sub-national, or local level and can also be
comprised of insurance scheme pooling.
zz Purchases for health care can generally entail:
zz the government paying directly for the budgets of government owned health care providers of
services (including medicines and products);
zz government payments for services delivered by public or private sector providers;
zz national, social, or private insurance payments for services; and
zz out of pocket payments.
zz WHO argues that “A good health financing system raises adequate funds for health, in ways
that ensure people can use needed services, and are protected from financial catastrophe or
impoverishment associated with having to pay for them. It provides incentives for providers and
users to be efficient.”
zz Based on HFG analysis, 12 of 43 African countries, including Angola, Gabon, Namibia, and South
Africa, already spend at least US$ 60 per capita on health from domestic sources, which is an
internationally accepted essential package of health services.
zz Very high levels of OPP indicate that a population is at risk of reduced access to care and
catastrophic health expenditures, and the health system’s financing structure and levels may need
attention to address this problem. Government payment for services is considered best practice
to encourage quality and performance at the facility level.
zz Read more about health financing in Universal Coverage of Essential Health Services in Sub-
Saharan Africa: Projections of Domestic Resources.
47. Tips for Writing Compelling Stories ▬ 41
Health Governance
zz Effective governance is a key success factor to meeting the health needs of a population.
zz When governance of the health sector is weak, investments are far less likely to achieve their
intended results.
zz Corruption is the most extreme symptom of poor governance and can be found:
zz At the facility level: informal payments being asked of patients for services that should be free,
“ghost” health workers receiving salaries who are not actually showing up for work
zz In government: shady procurement practices for drugs, bribes for import approvals or
accreditations, etc.
zz In state insurance organizations: large pools of revenues with insufficient regulation or
oversight may invite syphoning of funds.
zz In the private sector: private service providers submit false claims for payment of services to
social or private health insurance schemes.
zz In some countries, a lack of transparency and of civil society engagement threatens to undermine
the effective use of health care funds, particularly when global programs target large amounts of
funding for specific diseases. In others, policies are developed with limited domestic stakeholder
input and are not analyzed early on for their financial costs, implications, and effects. As a result,
they may remain unfunded without advocates to hold governments accountable.
zz Solutions to poor health sector governance should tackle both the demand and supply sides
of governance. The demand side entails working with citizens, the media, and oversight entities
to increase their ability to voice their needs and ensure accountability. On the supply side,
interventions should strengthen the Ministry of Health’s and other health sector actors’ incentives
and ability to share information, incorporate external input, and deliver improved performance.
zz Policymakers and donors alike know that strong health governance at all levels is necessary
to ensure that resources devoted to the health sector achieve their intended results, namely
expanded access to health care and improved health. If health governance takes place efficiently,
effectively, and equitably in a country, then responsive and sustainable health services can lead to
positive health outcomes.
zz An informed and responsible media can contribute to stronger health sector governance by
providing a watch dog function and educating the population.
Health Insurance
zz There are different types of health insurance, including national health insurance, social health
insurance, CBHI, and private health insurance.
zz Each country has its own mix of health insurance choices depending on its resources, leadership,
and health financing and governance. For more information and country examples, see WHO’s
systematic review of the impact of health insurance in Africa and Asia.
zz Health insurance is important to protect people from financial ruin when they seek health care.
48. 42 ▬ The Health Finance and Governance Briefing Kit
Health Systems Strengthening
zz Well-functioning health systems deliver the quality health care people need, when they need it,
where they need it, and at prices they can afford. USAID defines health systems strengthening
as a set of interventions that comprise the strategies, responses, and activities that are designed
to sustainably improve country health system performance. It is “a process that concentrates
on ensuring that people and institutions, both public and private, undertake core functions
of the health system—governance, financing, service delivery, health workforce, information,
and medicines/vaccines/other technologies—in a mutually enhancing way, to improve health
outcomes, protect citizens from catastrophic financial loss and impoverishment due to illness,
and ensure consumer satisfaction, in an equitable, efficient and sustainable manner.”
zz Strengthening a health system is different from supporting a health system. Supporting the
health system refers to any activity that improves services, from upgrading facilities and
equipment to distributing mosquito nets. In contrast, strengthening the health system requires
more comprehensive changes to policies and regulations, financing mechanisms, organizational
structures, and relationships across the entire system. Both supporting and strengthening efforts
are important and necessary, and the balance between them should be driven by a country’s
context and priorities.
zz Learn more about health systems and how the different components work together here:
www.healthsystemassessment.com
Innovative Financing
zz To reach their Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) targets by 2015, many countries turned
to creating innovative or nontraditional financing options to generate additional resources and
revenue for their health sector.
zz The Third International Conference on Financing for Development, held in Addis Ababa,
Ethiopia in July 2015, reached consensus on an economic framework to support the sustainable
development agenda.
zz Not all of the new financing mechanisms are taxes. Other options include public-private
partnerships for the health sector. For other examples, see the report Domestic Innovative
Financing for Health: Learning from Country Example.
Insurance Beneficiaries
zz Beneficiaries should understand what services their health insurance scheme covers and which
ones it does not. They should also understand where they can access services and understand
the fee structure in advance of using those health services.
zz Health insurance schemes are financed or paid for by the beneficiaries (through their premium
contributions).
zz Health insurance involves a contract which is the policy, and it is between the insurer and the
policy holder (this individual and his/her family are the beneficiaries.) Insurance companies and
organizations should be held accountable to uphold commitments made in the policy.
49. Tips for Writing Compelling Stories ▬ 43
Millennium Development Goals (MDGs)
zz The world has made significant progress in achieving many of the goals – between 1990 and 2002
the number of people in extreme poverty declined by an estimated 130 million.
zz Similarly, child mortality rates fell from 103 deaths per 1,000 live births a year to 88.
zz New HIV infections are declining worldwide.
zz The global estimated incidence of malaria has decreased by 17 percent since 2000, and malaria-
specific mortality rates by 25 percent.
National Health Accounts (NHA)
zz NHAs offer a lot of important information that can influence health policy. For instance, they
show how much money a government spends on health, who finances health care, how much
households spend on health, and which health conditions get the most or least resources.
In Kenya, for example, an analysis of the 2009-2010 NHA data show:
zz Total Health Expenditure (THE) per capita increased from Kenya shilling (Ksh) 2,636 (US$34)
in 2001/02 to Ksh 3,203 (US$42) in 2009/10, a 24 percent increase.
zz Government health expenditures as a percentage of total government expenditures declined
from 8.0 percent in 2001/02 to 5 percent in 2009/10.
zz Public sector financing has remained constant over the last decade, at about 29 percent of THE,
while donor contributions more than doubled.
zz The health sector continues to be predominantly financed by private sector sources (including
households’ OOP spending).