Download to read offline
![THE BARNUM FORER EFFECT
In what has been described as a "classic experiment", Psychologist Bertram Forer,
University of Massachusetts, gave a psychology test – his so-called "Diagnostic
Interest Blank" – to his psychology students, who were told that they would each
receive a brief personality sketch based on their test results.
One week later Forer gave each student a purportedly individualized sketch and
asked each of them to rate it on how well it applied to them. In reality, each student
received the same sketch, consisting of items like the following ….
Phineas Taylor Barnum
On average, the students rated its accuracy as
4.30 on a scale of 0 (very poor) to 5 (excellent).
Only after the ratings were turned in was it
revealed that all students had received an
identical personality sketch assembled by Forer
from a newsstand astrology book.
This effect, sometimes called the Barnum Forer
effect or the Barnum effect can provide a partial
explanation for the widespread social learning
about some paranormal beliefs, practices and
the faith in some ‘so called’ tests and
assessments.
These characterizations are often used by
practitioners as a con-technique, nudging
victims into believing that they are endowed
with a paranormal gift. Because the assessment
statements are so vague, people ascribe their
own interpretation,
thus the statement becomes "personal" to them.
Also, individuals are more likely to accept
negative assessments of themselves if they
perceive the person presenting the assessment
as a potential high-status professional.
Have you experienced the Barnum Forer effect
lately?
ORIGINAL DRAFT
Psychologist Ross Stagner of Wisconsin
University, asked a number of personnel
managers to take a personality test.
After they had taken the test, Stagner, instead of
responding with feedback based on their actual
individual answers, presented each of them with
generalized feedback that had no relation to
their test answers but that was, instead, based on
horoscopes, graphological analyses, and the like.
Each of the managers was then asked how
accurate the assessment of him or her was. More
than half described the assessment as accurate,
and almost none described it as wrong.
Many years later, in what has been described as a
"classic experiment", Psychologist Forer, University
of Massachusetts, gave a psychology test – his
so-called "Diagnostic Interest Blank" – to his
psychology students, who were told that they
would each receive a brief personality sketch based
on their test results. One week later Forer gave each
student a purportedly individualized sketch and
asked each of them to rate it on how well it applied.
In reality, each student received the same sketch,
consisting of items like the following ….
The Barnum effect, also called the Forer effect or,
less commonly, the Barnum–Forer effect, is a
common psychological phenomenon whereby
individuals give high accuracy ratings to
descriptions of their personality that supposedly
are tailored specifically to them, yet which are in
fact vague and general enough to apply to a wide
range of people.
This effect can provide a partial explanation for
the widespread acceptance of some paranormal
beliefs and practices, such as astrology, fortune
telling, aura reading, and some types of
personality tests.
These characterizations are often used by
practitioners as a con-technique to convince
victims that they are endowed with a paranormal
gift. Because the assessment statements are so
vague, people ascribe their own interpretation,
thus the statement becomes "personal" to them,
integral to their habit formation.
Also, individuals are more likely to accept
negative assessments of themselves if they
perceive the person presenting the assessment
as a high-status professional.
Researcher Bertram Forer originally named it the
"fallacy of personal validation".
The effect has been said to confirm the
Pollyanna principle, where individuals tend "to
use or accept positive words of feedback more
frequently than negative words of feedback."[8]
Two factors are important in producing the Forer
effect, according to the findings of replication
studies. The content of the description offered is
important, with specific emphasis on the ratio of
positive to negative trait assessments. The other
important factor is that the subject, in their
learning journey, trusts the honesty of the
person providing feedback.
Author -
Founder, chief executive officer
JITHESH ANAND
Jithesh earned his Organisation
Development spurs at XLRI, TISS and ISABS. He
has 25 years of work experience, serving a range
of enterprises in various sectors, behind him. A
keen student of human behaviours and
technology applications to maximise enterprise
success, he is also a certified Neuro-Leadership
Coach and Applied Behaviours practitioner. His
energy is focussed on creating the best-in-class
products and technology applications to help our
customers revive, survive, and thrive.
EXACTLY !!
SO..TRUE !!
4.30
0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00
UNDERSTANDING BEHAVIOURS BETTER (1)
GULLIBILITY AND THE USE OF POSITIVE GENERALISATIONS
rating
Two factors are important in producing the
Barnum-Forer effect.
1) The content of the description offered is
important, with specific emphasis on the higher
ratio of positive to lower negative trait
assessments
2) The subject trusts the honesty of the person
providing feedback.
7. You have a great need for other people to like and admire you.
8. You have a tendency to be critical of yourself.
9. You have a great deal of unused capacity which you have not turned to your advantage.
10. While you have some personality weaknesses, you are generally able to compensate for them.
11. Some of your aspirations tend to be pretty unrealistic.
12. Security is one of your major goals in life……and about a dozen more similar statements
On average, the students rated its accuracy as 4.30 on a scale of 0 (very poor) to 5 (excellent). Only
after the ratings were turned in was it revealed that all students had received an identical vignette
assembled by Forer from a newsstand astrology book.[11] The vignette contained statements that
were vague and general enough to apply to most people.
1. You have a great need for other people to like and admire you
2. You have a tendency to be critical of yourself
3. You have a great deal of unused capacity which you have not turned to your advantage
4. While you have some personality weaknesses, you are generally able to compensate for them
5. Some of your aspirations tend to be pretty unrealistic
6. Security is one of your major goals in life……and about a dozen more similar statements!!](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/ubb001thebarnumforereffect-220804131512-396593c6/95/The-Barnum-Forer-Effect-1-638.jpg)
Uploaded byESPL2
The Barnum Forer Effect
Our company ESPL commenced operations in July 2020 and is a Govt of India recognised Start-Up, based in Mumbai. We are a group of Technology and Behavioural Science enthusiasts – IIT, XLRI & TISS alumni, with over 100 years of collective professional experience, focussed on bringing the Internet of Behaviours technology and Behavioural Neuroscience together. We offer a modular, Behaviour-based platform to help our customers drive specific behaviour-based growth priorities. Our product trulead is an outcome of more than 4 years of our research, active experimentation in live enterprise environments, professional experience and advice from top practitioners in the industry. Tru360 can operate stand-alone or as a behaviour based force multiplier bolted onto your existing digital tools
The Barnum Forer Effect
- 1. THE BARNUM FOREREFFECT In what has been described as a "classic experiment", Psychologist Bertram Forer, University of Massachusetts, gave a psychology test – his so-called "Diagnostic Interest Blank" – to his psychology students, who were told that they would each receive a brief personality sketch based on their test results. One week later Forer gave each student a purportedly individualized sketch and asked each of them to rate it on how well it applied to them. In reality, each student received the same sketch, consisting of items like the following …. Phineas Taylor Barnum On average, the students rated its accuracy as 4.30 on a scale of 0 (very poor) to 5 (excellent). Only after the ratings were turned in was it revealed that all students had received an identical personality sketch assembled by Forer from a newsstand astrology book. This effect, sometimes called the Barnum Forer effect or the Barnum effect can provide a partial explanation for the widespread social learning about some paranormal beliefs, practices and the faith in some ‘so called’ tests and assessments. These characterizations are often used by practitioners as a con-technique, nudging victims into believing that they are endowed with a paranormal gift. Because the assessment statements are so vague, people ascribe their own interpretation, thus the statement becomes "personal" to them. Also, individuals are more likely to accept negative assessments of themselves if they perceive the person presenting the assessment as a potential high-status professional. Have you experienced the Barnum Forer effect lately? ORIGINAL DRAFT Psychologist Ross Stagner of Wisconsin University, asked a number of personnel managers to take a personality test. After they had taken the test, Stagner, instead of responding with feedback based on their actual individual answers, presented each of them with generalized feedback that had no relation to their test answers but that was, instead, based on horoscopes, graphological analyses, and the like. Each of the managers was then asked how accurate the assessment of him or her was. More than half described the assessment as accurate, and almost none described it as wrong. Many years later, in what has been described as a "classic experiment", Psychologist Forer, University of Massachusetts, gave a psychology test – his so-called "Diagnostic Interest Blank" – to his psychology students, who were told that they would each receive a brief personality sketch based on their test results. One week later Forer gave each student a purportedly individualized sketch and asked each of them to rate it on how well it applied. In reality, each student received the same sketch, consisting of items like the following …. The Barnum effect, also called the Forer effect or, less commonly, the Barnum–Forer effect, is a common psychological phenomenon whereby individuals give high accuracy ratings to descriptions of their personality that supposedly are tailored specifically to them, yet which are in fact vague and general enough to apply to a wide range of people. This effect can provide a partial explanation for the widespread acceptance of some paranormal beliefs and practices, such as astrology, fortune telling, aura reading, and some types of personality tests. These characterizations are often used by practitioners as a con-technique to convince victims that they are endowed with a paranormal gift. Because the assessment statements are so vague, people ascribe their own interpretation, thus the statement becomes "personal" to them, integral to their habit formation. Also, individuals are more likely to accept negative assessments of themselves if they perceive the person presenting the assessment as a high-status professional. Researcher Bertram Forer originally named it the "fallacy of personal validation". The effect has been said to confirm the Pollyanna principle, where individuals tend "to use or accept positive words of feedback more frequently than negative words of feedback."[8] Two factors are important in producing the Forer effect, according to the findings of replication studies. The content of the description offered is important, with specific emphasis on the ratio of positive to negative trait assessments. The other important factor is that the subject, in their learning journey, trusts the honesty of the person providing feedback. Author - Founder, chief executive officer JITHESH ANAND Jithesh earned his Organisation Development spurs at XLRI, TISS and ISABS. He has 25 years of work experience, serving a range of enterprises in various sectors, behind him. A keen student of human behaviours and technology applications to maximise enterprise success, he is also a certified Neuro-Leadership Coach and Applied Behaviours practitioner. His energy is focussed on creating the best-in-class products and technology applications to help our customers revive, survive, and thrive. EXACTLY !! SO..TRUE !! 4.30 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 UNDERSTANDING BEHAVIOURS BETTER (1) GULLIBILITY AND THE USE OF POSITIVE GENERALISATIONS rating Two factors are important in producing the Barnum-Forer effect. 1) The content of the description offered is important, with specific emphasis on the higher ratio of positive to lower negative trait assessments 2) The subject trusts the honesty of the person providing feedback. 7. You have a great need for other people to like and admire you. 8. You have a tendency to be critical of yourself. 9. You have a great deal of unused capacity which you have not turned to your advantage. 10. While you have some personality weaknesses, you are generally able to compensate for them. 11. Some of your aspirations tend to be pretty unrealistic. 12. Security is one of your major goals in life……and about a dozen more similar statements On average, the students rated its accuracy as 4.30 on a scale of 0 (very poor) to 5 (excellent). Only after the ratings were turned in was it revealed that all students had received an identical vignette assembled by Forer from a newsstand astrology book.[11] The vignette contained statements that were vague and general enough to apply to most people. 1. You have a great need for other people to like and admire you 2. You have a tendency to be critical of yourself 3. You have a great deal of unused capacity which you have not turned to your advantage 4. While you have some personality weaknesses, you are generally able to compensate for them 5. Some of your aspirations tend to be pretty unrealistic 6. Security is one of your major goals in life……and about a dozen more similar statements!!
- 2.